Britain’s Jihadists Within

_70976852_019514832-2Some of the “freedom fighters” who are at war against the evil tyrant Assad in Syria, the “rebels” whom both U.S. President Obama and British Prime Minister Cameron wanted to help, have now been re-classified as “the biggest threat to Britain’s security” and a “greater threat than al-Qaeda terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan.” The British Home Office identifies Syria as “the most significant development in global terrorism.”

More than half of anti-terror investigations by the UK security service MI5 involve “Britons” who went to fight in Syria. Charles Farr, the Home Office’s counter-terrorism chief, and others warned that the Syrian war is stoking the biggest terror threat to the West since September 11, and this problem is predicted to persist for as long as the hostilities will continue.

Syria is much closer to Europe than Afghanistan and Pakistan, making it a particularly easy and dangerous destination for UK Muslims who come back well trained, armed and ready for business: terrorism. And because the security services monitor about half of them, the risk is very high.

Robert Spencer asks some pertinent questions:

Why aren’t they monitoring the rest? And why were these men let back into the country in the first place? Simply because they’re citizens? (Are they even all citizens?)

In the past three years, from the beginning of the conflict, no fewer than 500 Britons have travelled to Syria to fight, many more than the corresponding number for Iraq. According to French President Francois Hollande, they are actually up to 700.

Between 250 and 400 of them are believed to be back with us, although the number may be higher. Apparently, they found life there “too hard,” so they say. But they may have been encouraged to return “home” in order to carry out attacks in the UK.

Hundreds more are still in Syria, and one of them has posted an Internet video urging his coreligionists in Britain to join them and help their Syrian brothers and sisters, saying: “The doors of jihad are still open.” He is a member of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), a group which wants Syria to become an Islamic state ruled by Sharia law and which is considered too extreme even by Al-Qaeda, that officially disowned it. The first provincial capital to be occupied by ISIS was the city of Raqqa, on whose Christian community it has imposed payment of the jizya and other rules associated with dhimmi status.

These are people who know their Islam, no doubt. They’ve forced even the BBC reporters to become familiar with the triple choice: convert, submit, die.

Aymenn al-Tamimi, a University of Oxford expert on Iraqi and Syrian jihadists, said:

In case ISIS’s ambitions to a global caliphate were still not apparent to anyone, ISIS’s official Twitter account for Raqqa province had this to say on the imposition of the dhimmi pact: ‘Today in Raqqa and tomorrow in Rome.’

ISIS uses British radicalised recruits, like Anil Khalil Raoufi, the University of Liverpool student of engineering who was recently killed in Syria.

The Syrian war is helping to accelerate the “final solution” for Christians in the Middle East.

The rebels’ ruthlessness is not in question. A Facebook video shows a British jihadist in Syria torturing and executing another jihadi who had insulted Allah, with the caption: “I can’t wait for feeling you get when U just killed some1.”

Who are the British jihadists in Syria?” asks the BBC. The answer: “The Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King’s College London says most British jihadists are university-educated Muslims of British Pakistani origin in their 20s.” Ah! And I thought that, as the Left says, violent jihad and Muslim terrorism are caused by poverty and deprivation. It turns out that, once again, these people are mainly middle class.

UK security services last autumn intercepted a plot by “British” jihadists returning from Syria planning a Nairobi-style gun attack on civilians in a crowded location, maybe in London.

Furthermore, Al-Qaeda urged “lone wolf” terrorists trained in Syria to target the Queen with bomb attacks at British sporting events, including the Derby. Cheltenham races, Wimbledon and Football Association Cup matches are other recommended potential targets that could cause “maximum carnage.”

The recommendations come from Inspire, an English-language online magazine produced by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), that lists Britain as Al Qaeda’s biggest target after America.

The big question is: what to do?

Robert Spencer is not the only one calling for not letting Syria jihadists back into the UK. The Week has a sensible suggestion:

Pass a law forbidding any British subject from travelling to Syria – unless registered with a charity authorised by the Foreign Office…

But anyone suspected of making an unauthorised trip to Syria would not be re-admitted to the United Kingdom.  Put up posters to that effect at every airport and seaport…  “If you travel to Syria illegally, you will not be allowed to return here.”

Preventing any more of these jihadists coming ‘home’ would be the simplest solution.  Dealing with an attack by such men once it kicks off will be difficult.  Terrorists on shooting sprees of this kind inflict damage quickly, relying on a shock effect to cow their intended victims.  No doubt the SAS or SBS will arrive, but even they will be lucky to arrive in time.

The butcher’s bills have been quite severe.  Mumbai: 153 killed and more than 600 wounded.  Nairobi: 67 dead and 175 wounded.  In both cases hundreds of millions of pounds worth of damage were also caused to property.  Imagine if something similar were to happen in London.

The UK’s Home Office, despite tough talking, has let these potential terrorists back into the country. We’ve heard threats to arrest and prosecute them from the Crown Prosecution Service.

There have been arrests: while only 24 people last year, already 20 this year, including Moazzam Begg, a former Guantánamo detainee – yes, one of those innocent souls – whose trial date has been set in October.

But his arrest has caused protests from the Muslim community, claiming that they are being unfairly targeted. What’s new?

That has made government officials even more “aware of the thin line they must tread in dealing with the problem” than they already were.

UK Muslim charities delivering aid in Syria complain that they risk being arrested for terrorism on their volunteers’ return home – as if one eighth of zakat (Islamic charity) were not obliged to finance jihad according to Sharia law.

In fact, ten Muslim charities linked to Syria are under surveillance after Adeel Ali, the head of a UK charity that raised thousands of pounds from the British public for Syria, has been photographed embracing masked fighters brandishing an AK47.

With Islam, you never know where the money supposedly for charity ends up. There’s ample evidence of “charity workers” in Syria supporting jihadi “martyrs.”

The Left, as usual, sides with the Muslim community and blames the government, like George Monbiot in The Guardian making this historical comparison: ‘If George Orwell and Laurie Lee were to return from the Spanish civil war today, they would be arrested under section five of the Terrorism Act 2006.”

But a legitimate question has been raised: how can a government, like the British one, which only a few months ago was prepared to join the war against Assad and be allied to the same “fighters” on whose side these jihadists are battling, now consider them criminals? Isn’t it a bit inconsistent? This, after all, is the same government that openly supports the downfall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, backs the Syrian rebels pursuing this goal, lost a parliamentary vote on military intervention in Syria last year — and is fully aware that its allies in the Gulf are funding al-Qaeda-affiliated groups in Syria. This inconsistency clearly shows how that pro-rebel stance is a terrible error.

And how likely is it that anything will be done to British-citizen Syrian jihadists now, when in an analogous situation in the case of the NATO-backed uprising in Libya in 2011 no British jihadi fighting in Libya was arrested? After all, to punish them would be “Islamophobic.”


Don’r miss this week’s Glazov Gang with Gavin Boby, of the Law and Freedom Foundation, who shared his fight against Muslim Rape Gangs and Mosque Building in the U.K.:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • wileyvet

    They need a one way ticket to Paradise. The Muslims claim that they are being unfairly targeted. In contrast to Christians in Syria. They don’t speak out about that, but rally around a scumbag Muslim terrorist instead. Or get violent when someone tears up pages of a Koran at a soccer match. OK, if you love your Islam so much GET OUT. Go back to where you came from, or if born in England to your ethnic place of origin. I think if something catastrophic happens in England, the British people will awake from their slumber and hopefully turf their paralyzed government out, and no longer put up with the multicultural policies that are destroying their nation. This cannot continue any longer. All Muslim immigration must stop NOW. All special treatment of Muslims must end. If any more incidents develop, then ALL Muslims should be given 6 months to get their affairs in order and then deported. Nothing will be confiscated, and they will get fair market value for their assets, unlike what Muslims did to the Jews across the Middle East after 1948, when over 800,000 Jews were forced out, sometimes with as little as 3 days to prepare, and had most of their wealth taken from them. Many never made it as the Arabs just killed them and took their things. Whole communities with a history predating Islam were uprooted and sent packing and their homes and belongings appropriated. The Egyptians, Iraqis and Yemenis were particularly brutal. So England’s Muslims will not face the despicable treatment that their coreligionists meted out in the Islamic nations. They would not be packed into cattle cars, or herded along the road at gun point or assembled in concentration camps and left to starve or die of hunger, but transported by airplane or ship. If anyone thinks this is harsh, talk to an Armenian or a Jew or a Serb.

    • BagLady

      They would not be packed into cattle cars, or herded along the road at
      gun point or assembled in concentration camps and left to starve or die
      of hunger, but transported by airplane or ship. If anyone thinks this is
      harsh, talk to an Armenian or a Jew or a Serb.

      With respect, these atrocities were carried out by white Caucasions. Why are you blaming it on Muslims?

      • Softly Bob

        Armenian Genocide – carried out by Muslim Turks

        Jewish persecution – carried out by various people throughout history including Muslims.

        Massacre, rape and torture of Serbs – carried out at various periods in history by Ottoman Muslim Turks. Carried out in World War 2 by Haj Amin al-Husseini’s Bosnian Muslim division who were fighting on the side of the Nazis.

        • UCSPanther

          Don’t forget Croatian dictator Anton Pavelic and his Ustasha stormtroopers.

          • ArentIpretty

            And let’s not forget Smyrna.

      • Drakken

        You go ahead and give quarter and mercy to the muslims, the rest of us won’t.

  • Dyer’s Eve

    The Earth is being inoculated by a disease called Islam. Eradicate it! I hope Nostradamus is right about ‘the fleet’ and its victory. Otherwise, I hope the sun goes black.

    • chuckie2u

      Don’t be surprised to hear the Pope has come up with a new deal to bring in the Moderate Muslims under the banner of a U.N. sponsored religion.

  • BagLady

    More than half of anti-terror investigations by the UK security service MI5 involve “Britons” who went to fight in Syria.

    Makes you wonder how they get visas to to and fro.


      Miss Piggy, You voted for your leaders who support and give benefits for jihadism.

      • BagLady


  • Drakken

    Well let the chips now fall where they may, in a Machiavellian sort of way, this might be the proverbial straw that breaks the camels back, and the Brits finally say they have had enough and won’t take muslims in their midst anymore. When you Brits get your own Bombay sort of scenario or Beslan, maybe they might repay the muslims in their own bloody coin and tell the leftist enablers of islam where to stick their PC/MC cultural suicide.

    • nicky

      Or put the leftist enablers of islam on trial for treason maybe? I think telling them to stick it, is a bit light don’t you?

  • ArentIpretty

    The British People NEED to completely overhaul their political leadership if they’re going to have any chance of defeating the invasion those elites have allowed to occur.

  • hellosnackbar

    The quasi religious dogma of political correctness is enforced by poisoned poltroons.
    It’s time for the concept of free speech to be redefined as free speech ; unless of course it is unsubstantiated slander!

  • chuckie2u

    It seems the godless elites in England who have rejected Christianity and substituted Secular Humanism as their god are learning there are folks out there who take their religion seriously. As Islam gains in political power the English infidels will convert to Islam or wish they had given up their infidel ways. The U.S. is headed in the same direction as the economy tanks .