‘Easy Meat’: Inside the World of Muslim Rape Gangs — on The Glazov Gang

yh[Subscribe to The Glazov Gang and LIKE it on Facebook.]

A horrifying news report in The Telegraph has recently confirmed that 1,400 children were discovered as victims of Muslim rape gangs and prostitution rings in Rotherham, UK, while authorities and child protection services turned a blind eye in order to avoid being called “racist.”

Daniel Greenfield’s blog at The Point deals with this shameful and outrageous story: “UK Police Arrested Parents Trying to Stop Muslims from Raping their Children.”

In response to the surfacing of this story, and to shed light on the dark forces that help make the vicious system of Islamic sex slavery possible in the West, Frontpage is re-running The Glazov Gang’s special 2-part series with Gavin Boby of the Law and Freedom Foundation about the terrifying reality of Muslim rape gangs in the UK and how the Left facilitates their barbaric crimes against helpless young girls. The series crystallizes why the horrible story emerging about the 1,400 child victims in Rotherham was a Muslim crime that the Left allowed to occur.

In Part I, Boby shares his battle against “Muslim Rape Gangs in the U.K.” and in Part II, he discusses his report on this horrifying phenomenon, “Easy Meat, and takes us “Inside the World of Muslim Rape Gangs”:

Part I:

Part II:

To watch previous Glazov Gang episodes, Click Here.

LIKE Jamie Glazov’s Fan Page on Facebook.

  • FedUpWithWelfareStates

    The UK (What Frigging kingdom?) & the British people have only themselves to blame for the mess that they have created…

    • john spielman

      the longer the govt waits to stop the islamification of the UK, the closer they get to a vicious (UN)civil war!

      • JB Ziggy Zoggy

        Imagine the islamopithecines with control of the UK’s military and nukes.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          Does Prince Charles count as an islamopithecine?

          http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/charles-460593.jpg

          • IslamDownpressesHumanity

            Maybe the royals of the UK are hoping to once again re-assert the power they enjoyed in England’s middle ages — and don’t mind embracing islam to see it happen. There is moslem propaganda claiming Queen Elizabeth is a direct descendant of muhammud himself.

    • Skip V. Patel

      The U.S. imported more muslims in one year, than the Brits did in two hundred years. Check out Refugee Resettlement Watch. American immigration policy has been Islamic Centric for at least 14 years.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        Time to export/deport/repatriate the muslims.

        • IslamDownpressesHumanity

          It would take a revolution or civil war to implement such a plan.

  • Hellosnackbar

    It’s time for the active destruction of the Islam cult!
    The very idea that imaginary Allah and his Mobots deserve any kind of sympathy is well passed!
    They even have the the cheek to describe their Imams as scholars.
    If this is recognised then rubbish dump workers would also be labelled scholars!

  • Craig Gorsuch

    Time for Americans to learn there is a considerable and fundamental difference between Islam and Christianity.

    • Well Done

      There is a considerable difference between Americans and Englishmen, as well. Ask any American woman married to a Brit.

      • JB Ziggy Zoggy

        What do you mean?

      • Skip V. Patel

        Just because British men are more educated, polite and worldly…doesn’t make them better than the good ol’ boys.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          “Educated”? “Polite”? “Worldly”?

          What kind of Education tolerates rape gangs preying on girls?

          Maybe if the Muslim rape gangs were preying on British boys, then the fops in the UK would get off their derrieres.

          • michelletherese

            It just goes to show how little value women still have in the West :-(

    • ratonis

      Well . . . uh. . . uh there’s violence in Christianity to, you know . . . uh . . . I mean look at abortion clinic bombings and . . . uh . . . uh . . . like the Crusades, you know?

      • IslamDownpressesHumanity

        What an idiotic argument of false equivalence. An argument of false equivalence because the total number of people killed in all abortion clinic terrorism is completely insignificant in comparison to the number of people murdered in the name of islam over the entire time period of abortion clinic terrorism. Ditto for the Crusades, because the number of najjis kaffir slaughtered in the name of islam in India alone (upwards of 80 million) makes all the Crusades put together look like a Sunday school picnic. Then there’s the fact that abortion clinic terrorism has all but ceased and there hasn’t been a Crusade in over 500 years.

        • Carole

          The crusades were to defend Christians from slaughter by the muslims!!

          • IslamDownpressesHumanity

            Let’s not gild the lily, the first Crusade might have had that aim in mind and maybe most of the Crusades had that in mind, but there was collateral damage to innocent Jews and non-Catholic Christians.

      • Dallas25305

        The Crusades where organised by the Pope because Muslims where taking over Christian lands and refusing to let Christians make pilgrimages to the holy lands. Something that had happened long before Mohammad invented his perverted, depraved religion. You must be a lefty? educated in one of our schools of lower learning to be that stupid. Read some history doofus you don’t have to be a fool all your life.

      • Carole

        Where??

  • bob e

    the PM says this has nothing to do with islam ..
    sure now .. it dosen’t have anything to do with pakistanis either ..

  • Platopus

    Is Islam really a religion? These are some really sick sick creatures.

  • Conniption Fitz

    Where is Lorena Bobbitt?

  • Lee

    According to Islam’s texts, Muhammad was a rapist, and he approved and decreed the rape of women by his Muslim gang, and he dictated these values into his Koran. Given this, it is natural that Muslims see non-Muslim women as women they *should* rape, or if they can’t fulfill Muhammad’s decrees, at least *approve* of their raping.

    Thus it is natural that Islamic clerics and teachers continue to publicly preach that non-Muslim women should be treated in the same manner as criminals treat prostitutes. For example the Grand Mufti of Australia defended the Islamic-inspired worst gang-rapes in that country’s history by calling non-Muslim women “uncovered meat” (see http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/muslim-leader-blames-women-for-sex-attacks/story-e6frg6nf-1111112419114?nk=171700a5a6816a01caef4d6b853da825 ).

    More recently UK schools were revealed teaching Muslim children that non-Muslim women were “white prostitutes” (see http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2651700/Hellfire-Muslim-teachers-Trojan-Horse-school-warned-six-year-olds-white-prostitutes.html ).

    Until Islam is prosecuted for criminal incitement, and all Muslims who refuse to denounce Muhammad’s actions and sayings in these regards are banned from civilized countries, we can expect the continuation of this 1,400 year-old Islamic behavior.

    • Carole

      Last paragraph you write about banning those muslims (who refuse to denounce Muhammad`s actions) from civilized countries is a brilliant idea!

      • IslamDownpressesHumanity

        The islamic faith encourages lying to the najjis kaffir. Muhammud himself encouraged one of his followers to lie — in order to facilitate the assassination of one of muhammud’s critics.

      • Lee

        Thanks Carole – I think ‘IslamDownpressesHumanity’ raises a good point about Muslims lying in their war on humanity, but if you simply ban all Muslims they just lie about their current religious affiliation. Perhaps questions on the Koran should be given to all people, as having people disavow criminal acts and values would be more politically acceptable than simply targeting Muslims.

        And I’m not suggesting a character test be as easy as “yes” or “no” answers, but more like just a few questions along the lines of “Tell me what you think about Muhammad stoning women and men to death?” “Tell me what you think about Muhammad saying Allah had given him women as ‘spoils of war’ in Koran 33.50?” “Or Muhammad marrying a 6 year-old girl?” etc etc.

        If people answer ambiguously – particularly on Koran questions – such as “It was the custom at the time” they fail the character test. Nothing but a compelling condemnation would be acceptable.

        Now of course this could still be abused, but my guess is the vast majority of Muslims – and Islamic supporters – would be unable to convincingly pass such as test – particularly if guidelines were given to testers such as “Respondents must refer to the repellent and criminal nature of such values and acts”.

        Interestingly, a few years ago the Islamofascist media complained about proposed citizenship tests in Germany and Holland which seemed to them to screen out Muslims – see http://www.dw.de/testing-the-limits-of-tolerance/a-1935900

  • cheechakos

    In 2010 the US Feds busted a gang of 100 muslim Somalians that groomed and prostituted girls in MN,OH & TN

  • barrycooper

    Insult is the sincerest form of flattery.

  • Roninf9

    This isn’t a problem with Islam. This is a problem with the Globalist
    Elites that rule (formerly) Great Britain importing millions of 3rd
    Worlders with 3rd World ways and 3rd World problems, giving them
    taxpayer handouts to survive and multiply, and using the courts and
    police to protect them from angry native Britons. The goal is the
    dispossession of the White British Middle-class and the destruction of
    Western Civilization on that island.

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it
    cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less
    formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the
    traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers
    rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government
    itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents
    familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he
    appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He
    rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to
    undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that
    it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

    ―-
    Marcus Tullius Cicero

    • IslamDownpressesHumanity

      In Plato’s Republic the most dire punishments were reserved for corrupt government officials.

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    Briticana, Please FOAD.

  • Lee

    Hi. No, Muhammad was a rapist – not just a paedophile/child-rapist. And he demanded his men rape captive women partly as a means of destroying the cohesion of the tribes he conquered, and partly to keep himself and his men rewarded and satisfied while they worked for him. Groups like Boko Haram, ISIS, and Al-Shabaab follow Muhammad’s example in this. Also, it is demonstrably true that the majority of Muslims know Muhammad was a rapist.

    To begin, for Muhammad promoting rape, see for example Islam’s explanation of why Muhammad invented Koran 4.24 (my caps): Hadith of Sahih Muslim 8, #3432

    ‘..Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) sent an army to Autas…Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions
    of Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) seemed to REFRAIN from HAVING INTERCOURSE with CAPTIVE WOMEN because of THEIR HUSBANDS… THEN Allah sent down regarding that
    (QUR’AN 4.24) ‘And all MARRIED women (are forbidden unto you) EXCEPT THOSE (CAPTIVES) whom your right hands possess. IT IS A DECREE OF ALLAH FOR YOU’

    So Muhammad’s thugs “refrained” from raping the captives due to fear of committing adultery, until Muhammad decrees the raping of these married women.

    Next, Muhammad pretends in his Koran that “Allah” actually calls the women he rapes “spoils of war”:

    Koran 33.50 O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and THOSE
    (captives) whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as SPOILS OF WAR..

  • IslamDownpressesHumanity

    Taqiyya Pet never stops defending islam — a task that requires dishonesty in large quantity.

  • IslamDownpressesHumanity

    Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzttt, wrong. The genocides of najjis kaffir committed by moslems in E. Timor, Armenia/Turkey, Sudan and Bangladesh all say differently.

  • IslamDownpressesHumanity

    Um, I haven’t noticed the pope calling for a worldwide jihad against non-Catholics. I haven’t noticed the pope calling for the stoning to death of adulterers. I haven’t noticed the pope calling for the slaughter of gays. I haven’t noticed any mass murder by Catholics recently, or any crusades. Your argument of false equivalence? FAIL.

  • IslamDownpressesHumanity

    Ah yes the “loyal” moslems of Israel. The kind of “loyal” moslem seen in India.