Talking About ‘the Moroccan Issue’ Is Not a Crime

wilders-markedReprinted from wsj.com.

Four years ago I was taken to court in the Netherlands on hate-crime charges. After a trial that lasted almost two years, I was finally acquitted. But the case cost me a lot of time and energy that, as an elected politician, I would rather have devoted to my parliamentary work.

Now, just as my Party for Freedom (PVV) is taking the lead in the polls and the Dutch government is facing serious political difficulties, the public prosecutor is again bringing me to court, this time for asking my party supporters, during a PVV electoral meeting in March, whether they want more or fewer Moroccans in the country.

This question needs to be understood in proper context.

In the Netherlands, as in many other Western European countries right now, problems arise when Muslim immigrants refuse to assimilate and integrate into the wider community. In our case I referred specifically to the Moroccans not because I have anything against them generally but because they are one of the largest immigrant groups here and are overrepresented in our crime and welfare statistics.

Moroccans are suspects in violent robberies 22 times as often as indigenous Dutch. Between 1996 and 2010, more than 60% of the Moroccan male youths born in 1984 had at least once been suspected of a crime, a rate three times as high as their indigenous counterparts. Meanwhile, 14% of the Moroccan population between ages 15 and 64 is dependent on welfare, compared with 9% for the Turks and 3% for the indigenous Dutch. According to Dick Schoof, the Dutch national coordinator for counterterrorism and security, Moroccans also account for three-quarters of all Dutch Muslims who leave for Syria to wage jihad.

The Dutch often refer to this problem as the “Moroccan issue.” If instead the Americans were the largest group of immigrants refusing to assimilate in the Netherlands, we would no doubt be referring to it as “the American issue.”

For almost a decade, my party has proposed three measures to address this issue. First, we want an end to immigration from Mulslim countries. Second, we want to expel all criminals of foreign nationality and, for those offenders who have dual nationality, deprive them of their Dutch citizenship, sending them back to the country of their other nationality. Third, we want to encourage the voluntary repatriation of non-Western immigrants.

These three measures don’t target any particular ethnic group, but given the demographics in our country it would immediately entail the presence of fewer Moroccans. Hence my question: “Do you want more or fewer Moroccans?” I never advocated that all Moroccans should leave. Nor do I object to every Moroccan. The decision to prosecute me for insulting an ethnic group and inciting hatred and discrimination is preposterous.

The prosecutor’s decision can’t be seen as being anything but politically motivated, especially when he has refused to prosecute two leading politicians of the governing Labor Party, Diederik Samsom and Hans Spekman, for similar statements on Moroccans. Mr. Samsom said that Moroccans have an “ethnic monopoly” on street crime, while Mr. Spekman said that Moroccans who don’t abide by the law have to be “humiliated in front of their own people.”

Polls have indicated that more than 43% of Netherlanders agree with me. I was thus expressing the feelings of millions in my country. In a democracy, a public debate about important political issues, such as “the Moroccan issue,” shouldn’t be restricted by criminalizing the expression of certain problems and policy proposals.

Unfortunately, political debate is now being increasingly restricted, not just in the Netherlands but across many European countries. Laws limiting freedom of expression, including the freedom of political debate, are introduced to protect subjective rights such as the right of certain groups to not feel offended, preventing the open discussion of pressing problems like those that arise from large-scale immigration across Western Europe. The unwillingness to address such problems is leading to the growth of parties, similar to my own PVV, in many other Western countries.

And existing laws are being applied ever more vigorously. Earlier this month, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the existing Dutch penal laws not only criminalize incitement to hatred and discrimination but also “incitement to intolerance.”

I don’t believe in political self-censorship. During the past 10 years, I have drawn attention to the problems that Dutch citizens experience related to integration, immigration and the Islamization of our society. And I have paid, and continue to pay, a very high price for it. For more than a decade now I have lived under constant police protection because I am on the death list of several Islamist terror groups. However, I will never let anyone silence me, no matter the consequences. My voters have elected me to express their concerns, and that is what I will do.

Prosecuting me as an elected politician for expressing the opinions of my constituents is absurd. Excluding certain problems from the political debate by making it a crime to discuss them won’t lead to the disappearance of these concerns, let alone contribute to a solution. This prosecution, moreover, is also dangerous. People will begin to lose their trust in the democratic process. Festering political problems do not go away simply because they are kept in a dark corner. I wish the Dutch public prosecutor had been wise enough to see that.

*

Don’t miss Geert Wilders on the Glazov Gang discuss “The West’s Battle for Freedom”:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Cristinascar

    It is not racist, the liberal of today is bizarro . Islam had a 300 year war with Poland and took over as much territory as Europe, more. No one censors more smoothly than Muslims , no greater evidence than the history of “palestine” as if the Ottoman Empire was not contigous, and Ottoman Syria did not exist. Or how Jordan has laws from the beginning barring all Jews from becomiung citizens like they always did in certain parts of the Muslim world where Jews got successful and it hurt their sensibilities.

  • coffee_now

    Dear Mr Wilders –
    I am one of your strongest supporters (although being down here in New Zealand there are limits to what I can do and how I can help). Nevertheless, I believe the Dutch people should be marching in the streets in their millions to protest this ridiculous action by the Dutch government.

    Europe (and the UK) have gone completely nuts when it comes to “offense”. It will not surprise me if it becomes a capital punishment matter in the next few years.

    “This prosecution, moreover, is also dangerous. People will begin to lose their trust in the democratic process.”

    I agree. I am surprised that Europe has not already exploded in a bonfire of anger and violence in frustration at both the cowardly “PC” leftist governments (and their refusal to listen to people’s concerns) and the *unparalleled flood* of Muslim immigrants to the West.

    Very best wishes Mr Wilder. I desperately hope that this charge can be thrown out of court. The *only* “court” that should pass judgement on such trivial matters is the “court of public opinion”.

    • Bamaguje

      “I am surprised that Europe has not already exploded in a bonfire of
      anger…” – coffee_now.

      The leftist lamestream media and educational system do their part to keep native Europeans sedated… dousing any concerns about Muslims as “Islamophobia” and “racism.”

  • http://gerardjackson.com/ gerard jackson

    Muslims are being used as an excuse by leftists to silence their opponents.

    • Chris Thomas

      More than
      likely, the Prosecutor ( or is it Persecutor ) is being PAID BY WEALTHY
      MUSLIMS either directly or indirectly. My guess is that across Europe,
      liberal politicians are paid under the table by wealthy Muslims to
      perpetuate this insanity. What do you think ?

  • Michelle Mostart

    The guy is an idiot! A racist provocateur that presents statistics that are misinterpreted, cherry-picked and mostly blatantly false as facts. And ofcourse his semi-analfabetic horde lacks the abilities to read the research he “quotes”.
    Wilders will do anything to be in the spotlights with his message of hate. He never has any solutions. He is like the little kid that starts a fire, runs away when the barn is burning to the ground and afterwards blames the firemen to act to slow. And Wilders will love it to be in court next year. Nothing beats free publicity in election times

    • hatsylady

      False.

      • Michelle Mostart

        In what respect?

        • hatsylady

          Well my husband is from the Netherlands and still has family there. They are being overrun. Their extreme tolerance is being used against them. Geert Wilders is no bomb thrower. He should be allowed to speak freely without fear for his life. We are all doomed.

    • wileyvet

      Are you really that oblivious to the conditions that have developed in Europe with the rise of Muslim immigrant populations? Are you really that naïve about the intent of Islam and its adherents? Do you not know that it is the purpose of Islam and Muslims to make Islam reign supreme over all others, to conquer the entire world and bring it into Dar-al-Islam? All people who are not Muslim must be fought until this comes to pass. Jihad is the method of spreading Islam, as it has been since Muhammad’s time.

      It is Islam that is intolerant of all other beliefs. The Koran is chock full of commands for Muslims to fight infidels, to treat them horribly as second class citizens or worse. To continue this struggle for all time in all places. Islam is supremacist in nature and does not accept others on an equal footing. If you are not Muslim you are Kafir. Worthy of persecution until you lay down and submit, or are killed or pay the Jizya.

      Mr. Wilders understands that Islam is NOT compatible in any way with western values or ideas of equality, human and civil rights, and all the other ideas that have created the societies we deem preferable. It is people like you that simply cannot or will not recognize those values as superior to the stultifying and draconian beliefs and laws that permeate Muslim culture and the dysfunctions it produces. There is not one single Muslim country in the world today that embraces freedom of conscience, thought, speech or religion. Not one that treats women on an equal basis and respects their uniqueness as persons.

      It is not Mr. Wilders that uses hate speech. Rather it is the Muslims, the clerics and imams spewing forth their Islam from every Mosque and Islamic center in every western nation and around the Muslim world that incites hatred and bigotry, intolerance and persecution against infidels, because that IS Islam.

      Attacks and harassment against Mr. Wilders is exactly what Muslims want. To obfuscate their true intent, to supress any and all criticism of Islam so that people stay ignorant of what Islam really is. Islam offers nothing, creates nothing. Bringing in millions of people from a culture that is so antithetical to one’s own has produced nothing but social discord. How on earth can one believe that such a culture could possibly improve that of the Dutch, or French et al?

      You need to look around you and think of all the things that will be erased under Sharia. Look at the complete lack of freedoms around the Muslim world and understand that those emigrating are bringing those retrograde ideas to every western country and nothing good can come of that. Mr. Wilder’s recognizes what is at stake; that is, nothing short of the complete eradication of western civilization, to be replaced by the barbarism and tribalism of a medieval ideology, and the repugnant implementation of Sharia.

      It is a pity that so many leftists like you despise the very culture and values that have produced the opportunities and prosperity that you enjoy, that you are willingly aiding the destruction of same said culture.

      Islam is doing to Europe what the Third Reich failed to do. No Panzers, no Stukas, no Jackbooted Fascist Blitzkrieg, but an insidious and pernicious stealth Jihad, culminating in the complete takeover of every European country and the ensuing bloodbath when their numbers are high enough. You are making that possible. You are deceiving yourself and others, and are making that day come sooner for you and your fellow citizens.

      • Sintram

        Brilliant!

    • PAthena

      Why do you say that Geert Wilders is a racist? Since when is Mohammedanism a race? It is a religion

      • Chris Thomas

        My guess is that across Europe, liberal politicians are paid under the table by wealthy Muslims to perpetuate this insanity.

        • GinoMachiavelli

          Not only Muslims …

      • Bobbie_Z

        Facts don’t matter in cases like this. Your logic falls on deaf ears. Their aim is grasping power by any means, the least of which is deceit.

    • phoebeintheforest

      Bless your little heart…

    • James Hamilton

      Mr.Wilders has presented some facts & statistical figures in support of his statement he made against Moroccans.
      You say they are ‘misinterpreted’ BUT you then skipped to give the correct interpretation yourself.
      If you counter somebody’s facts & figures then present your figures & facts to counter it, a mere statement that the figures presented by other party are not correct is neither convincing nor sincere.
      If Mr.Wilders had been doing all this for ‘political gains’, as you suggested in your comment, he wouldn’t be flowing against the tide of ‘political correctness’. He has been speaking honestly & courageously against our invaders, aggressors & oppressors (muslims immigrants), while others have cowered down for personal & political gains. I believe he has more morals than many of the political leaders of this age.

    • GinoMachiavelli

      Change “Wilders” to “Obama” and your post is brilliant !

      Oh, the irony …

    • Bodart

      Wrong!
      Mr. Wilders is a brilliant and courageous freedom fighter who should be forever thanked for standing up to the Islamists.
      Islam has no place in the Netherlands or the Western world; it’s an embarrassing and lethal stain on all civilization.
      Speaking as an American,I thank Wilders for all that he does for us !

      (And what race is Islam Michelle ?)

    • James_IIa

      “And Wilders will love it to be in court next year. Nothing beats free publicity in election times.”

      Possibly true, and if so, my hat is off to him–he makes a forceful display of the inverse intolerance that is aimed at him.

      With him in the dock and more “Allahu Akbar” murders happening going into the elections, he may be in a powerful position when the polls close.

  • kiwi41

    The time has come , Europe wide, for the N-a z-i judiciary members and their
    Ge sta po enforcers to become targets of violent dissent.

    Softly, softly won’t cut the mustard.

  • John Mark

    The New Testament seems to indicate that the European Peninsular will remain what it has been since the Emperor Augustus Caesar and the Messiah Jesus Christ were alive on the earth – namely Christianised.

    Not Islamised!

    However, the increasing population of Muslims over the rest is going to militate against this prediction, unless politicians and voters work together to keep our Peninsular Christianized.

    Consequently, I am sure that people like Geert Wilders and others like him will prevail and, indeed, only today it is reported another and even larger protest in Dresden over this issue.

    It won’t go away and it will fire up!

    • billobillo54

      I think the entire picture of Bible prophesy indicates that indeed Europeans will oppose the Islamic antichrist. Daniel 11:29-30: “At the appointed time he will return and come into the South, but this last time it will not turn out the way it did before. 30 For ships of Kittim will come against him…” “Kittim” refers to Mediterranean Europe.

      From Wikipedia: The expression “isles of Kittim”, found in the Book of Jeremiah 2:10 and Ezekiel 27:6, indicates that, some centuries prior to Josephus, this designation had already become a general descriptor for the Mediterranean islands.[3] Sometimes this designation was further extended to apply to Romans, Macedonians or Seleucid Greeks. The Septuagint translates the occurrence of “Kittim” in the Book of Daniel 11:30 as ῥωμαῖοι (“Romans”). 1 Maccabees 1:1 states that “Alexander the Great the Macedonian” had come from the “land of Kittim”.[

      • John Mark

        billo, I don’t think that Islam can be antichrist.

        Islam has nothing to do with Christ nor does it pretend to set itself up in the place of Christ, so it cannot be antichrist.

        The “anti” word actually means “in the place of”, so that an antichrist has to appear to be like Christ, to be on Christ’s side, as it were, in order to successfully get in the way of someone looking to Christ directly for himself or herself.

        I would suggest that all priests, ministers, pastors, bishops are antichrists, because instead of getting out of the way they intrude upon an individual’s coming to Jesus privately.

        Furthermore, they set themselves up as teachers, who are having to teach the “flock” because Christ has left the scene.

        But he hasn’t left the scene and he can still Teach the individual.

        He, in fact, said to his disciples that you have only ONE Teacher and that is the Messiah.

        So, for example, you go to your church service and the priest or minister who stands up to teach is anti-Christ.

        How about that then?

        • billobillo54

          JM: The Scriptures identify the antichrist. First, I stated the Islam is the “body” of antichrist. And, the person of the antichrist will be a Muslim. Here’s why:
          1. 1 John Chapter 2 identifies the antichrist as “he who denies the Son.” Islam denies the Son at the creedal, foundational, and defining level. It is a Unitarian heresy with great antagonism toward the Son and the Trinity.
          2. In Daniel 9:26 the text states “the PEOPLE of the prince who is to come (i.e. the antichrist) will destroy the Temple…” This is a clear reference to the Second Temple. The Hebrew word for “people” is the word “am” which means “ethnic group” or “kindred.” Josephus reports that the Tenth Legion destroyed the Temple. It was, according to Josephus, comprised of Turks, Arabs and Syrians. These are the “people” of the antichrist.
          3. Gideon according to Isaiah 9-10 and Psalm 83, is a type of the Messiah. When Gideon killed the Princes of Midian (i.e. Arabia) he took their crescent ornaments off their camels.
          4. In Revelation 20 the Saints are killed during the Tribulation by BEHEADING.
          5. The antichrist is referred to as the “King of Babylon” (Isaiah 14), “The King of Tyre” (Ezekiel 28), The harsh ruler of Egypt (Isaiah 19) and “The Assyrian” (Micah 5, et al).
          6. In Revelation Jesus speaking to the Church of Pergamum states they live “where Satan’s throne is.” Pergamum is in Turkey.
          There is a lot more evidence from the Scriptures. If you are interested I will continue.

          Sola Fide Bro

          • John Mark

            Thank you for your full reply, billo. It is really wonderful to find someone else on the internet who rarely cares about these matters, such as the identity of the anti-Christ.

            In a way, it is good that we have different understandings of this concept, because we can then talk and discuss.

            Firstly, the word “antichrist” only appears in the NT in 1 & 2 John, so that, it seems to me, we should only obtain our understanding of what “antichrist” means from these NT passages.

            Secondly, John wrote these verses more than 500 years before Islam existed.

            This means that he, John, did not have Islam in mind when he wrote, for example, “they bring about separation from us, yet they never belonged to us. If they had belonged to us, they would have stood WITH us. Instead, they show that not all of us belong to us” (1 J:2:19).

            Thirdly, since Islam cannot be antichrist, like atheists cannot be antichrist, for example, then who is antichrist?

            Well, John says that they show, by separating from us, that not “all of us belong to us”.

            Fourthly, if they had belonged to us, they would have stood with us.

            Fifthly, so we can say that antichrist are those, who are or have been very close to us, who have faith in Christ as Saviour, so close, in fact, that they appeared to have belonged to us for a while – before they separated from us.

            Sixthly, John tells us in 1,2:22, what it is that these antichrists do. They fail to show (in their speaking in public) that it is Jesus who is the Messiah. “This is what antichrist is: It is a denial of the Father as well as the Son”.

            Seventhly, they talk about all sorts of religious things but they marginalise Christ and, indeed, ignore him when they speak about Christianity.

            Eighthly, we can conclude that antichrists come from within the Christian community, pretending to be followers of Christ, but deny him by not speaking about the Name of Jesus Christ when they should.

            Ninthly, these antichrists talk about themselves, about their opinions on this and that but, because they don’t talk about Christ, they have got in the way of people knowing about the Messiah. They have put themselves in the place of Christ.

          • billobillo54

            Dear Bro JM: We disagree on a lot. I do agree on one thing. The most important: Jesus Christ is the entirety of our salvation. To Him be the glory and to Him is all merit and credit for us.

          • John Mark

            Indeed, Jesus Christ,though dead in the first century CE, is alive now to be the centre of our Life on account of the salvation he provided for us on the cross.

            As a result, we belong to a divine Family of which God is the Father and Jesus Christ is a fellow Child with us.

            I value being called Bro JM but what would you think that, instead of being called brothers (or sisters), we see ourselves as being Children.

            As Children together, we can say, for example, Dear fellow Child JM.

            It loses the tribal sense that brother has whilst, at the same time, bringing God the Father into the relationship between two, who would otherwise call themselves brothers.

          • billobillo54

            JM: Yes, we are His children. God bless you in Jesus’ Name.

  • 2wotvet

    Question: What if religious minorities who happen to live in Muslim Countries such as Christians or Yizidis wanted to immigrate to the Netherlands?

  • http://islamsfatalflaw.blogspot.com/ BobSmith101

    Leftists are trying to stop discussion of their failed policies.

    Keep talking – loud and clear.

    The leftists will squeal like the pigs they are.

  • Raymond Hietapakka

    After being presented with the demographic statistics, I more fully understand why Wilders specified individuals of Moroccan origin.

    • A Disqus User

      Imagine how much brainwashing it would take to convince the Japanese to
      flood Japan with NON-Japanese until they themselves become a minority

      To convince them to force affirmative action AGAINST THEMSELVES with all those NON-Japanese

      That this “diversity” is a strength

      And to convince them that it would be “racist” to NOT do this to themselves

      No need convincing WHITE anti-whites of this in EVERY white country, they’re already convinced

      Anti-Racist is a code for Anti-White

  • Chris Thomas

    Geert,
    First off, from America, thank you for your work. More than likely, the Prosecutor ( or is it Persecutor ) is being PAID BY WEALTHY MUSLIMS either directly or indirectly. My guess is that across Europe, liberal politicians are paid under the table by wealthy Muslims to perpetuate this insanity. What do you think ?

  • http://historyscoper.com/ T.L. Winslow

    Geert Wilders is on the right side of history, and despite all the sick leftist overlords currently in control of Europe who want it to commit cultural suicide in an orgy of self-hate, he will prevail, because he is on the Enlightened Civilization Team (ECT). Instead of treading water fighting govt. oppression, he should rise to become president and PM of all of Europe, leading it in reversing Muslim immigration and preaching the Great Muslim Apostasy that will dissolve the horrible violent backward Muslim World forever, spreading the best of Euro culture in its place. Already signs of a groundswell of the people in Germany are pissing the overlords off. Maybe 2015 will see the numbers swell into the tens of millions. We need a Europe where being anti-Islam is equated with being on the ECT. All it needs is a careful determined separation from Europe’s bad episodes of fascism and violence, concentrating on reversing Muslim immigration through new laws, using govt. force only sparingly as needed, and never to oppress or spread mindless hate agitprop, while encouraging free speech including satire and ridicule a la Voltaire and other European greats. The Muslim World should be treated as people suffering from a mass mental illness, with a sliding scale of justice depending on how bad they have it. The acid test for being on the ECT is enthusiastic support for the Jewish state of Israel, which should become partners with Europe in the ECT. Geert is the guy to lead this. Good work, Geert, and may Europe see it your way soon.

  • Metatrona

    Geert Wilders tells it as it is. So-called political correctness enables Muslims to spread their disgusting cult. ENOUGH WITH ENABLING THE SAVAGE MUSLIMS!

  • DVG

    I am so sad to hear this. Holland, you are making a terrible mistake. Islam is evil. It will be clear to all in time. Evil is deceitful. It hides it’s true nature until properly prepared. Acting meek will not spare you. Acting tolerant will not spare you. Learning the nature of the devil among you will help you to understand Mr Wilders is absolutely right. If you fail to heed his warnings, Holland will suffer a fate much worse than Hitler.

  • billobillo54

    Mr. Wilders: I hold you in the highest regard. I am an American who loves liberty.
    God bless you.

  • JVR

    The Left will also win in the case here.

  • T100C1970

    The muslim invasion of Europe from the south was terminated on the battlefield by Charles Martel at Tours in 732. The invasion from the east was finally terminated on the battlefield by a coalition of German, Polish and Lithuanian armies in 1683 .. though the results of that infestation persist in the Balkans (Albania, Bosnia) to this day.

    To this day the muslims understand that the CANNOT defeat the Europeans on the field of battle. But as surely as that is true, it is equally true that the Muslims are now winning the war for Europe at an alarming rate. The indigenous Europeans are committing self-genocide via their low birth rates. They are welcoming hordes of muslims with high birth rates into their midst, and they are attempting to muzzle anyone who points this out.

    By the time they get around to destroying the US the destruction of Europe will be a fait accompli.. But I predict we Americans will refuse to learn from the lesson.

  • http://twitter.com/WinstonCDN WinstonCDN

    Europeans are asleep…

  • LoJoFo

    “This prosecution, moreover, is also dangerous. People will begin to lose their trust in the democratic process.”–Geert Wilders

    This is what John Adams, our 2nd President, had to say about that: “It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished, for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world that they cannot all be punished. But if innocence itself is brought to the bar and condemned, perhaps to die, then the citizen will say, ‘whether I do good or whether I do evil is immaterial, for innocence itself is no protection,’ and if such an idea as that were to take hold in the mind of the citizen that would be the end of security whatsoever.”

  • Bobbie_Z

    How do I read your article if you put a pop-up ad in front of it that has no escape?

  • FactsRule

    While I agree with everything else you said, I have to say that your “Prosecuting me as an elected politician for expressing the opinions of my constituents is absurd.” should end with the word evil, not just absurd.
    God bless you, Geert, reward you in this world as well as the unimaginable reward you have waiting in the eternal world to come and save civilization.

  • Yusuf S. Ghazzali

    What do you mean Muslims do not want to “integrate” into Danish society…..do you want to abandon values of faith in God and morality and exchange them with the secular mishmash of relativism preached by Zionists?

    • mobuyus

      Ya let the muslims keep their values theft,rape, murder lying,bestiality,necrophillia and don’t forget child molestation.

  • Yusuf S. Ghazzali

    I am yet to meet an islamophobe who is not fiercely pro-Israel and pro-Zionist…….ample evidence of who funds the islamophobes like this “Danish politician”

    • I_Am_Me

      Nice ad hominem. Now you should go to a mirror and say sorry to yourself for being stupid and not knowing the difference between Danish and Dutch.

  • http://senatormark4.org/Alinsky5.htm senatormark4

    You’re a politician I admire. You speak when others are silent. It would be just great if you would implement a simple test to turn this assault on your beliefs on it’s head.

    Simply put, make it a crime to deny the fundamental rights defined in the U.S. Constitution First Amendment. Denying the First Amendment is surely incitement to barbarism. Right?

    IF you did nothing more than enshrine the First Amendment in your laws it would go further to helping prevent the islamization of Dutch life than any other act.

    No visas, NO aid to countries or people that deny the First Amendment. I wonder if ObamHOlder could do that since they already march http://senatormark4.org/Alinsky5.htm on a different road from freedom.