<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking About ‘the Moroccan Issue’ Is Not a Crime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: senatormark4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5528593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[senatormark4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5528593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re a politician I admire.  You speak when others are silent. It would be just great if you would implement a simple test to turn this assault on your beliefs on it&#039;s head. 


Simply put, make it a crime to deny the fundamental rights defined in the U.S. Constitution First Amendment.  Denying the First Amendment is surely incitement to barbarism.  Right?


IF you did nothing more than enshrine the First Amendment in your laws it would go further to helping prevent the islamization of Dutch life than any other act.


No visas, NO aid to countries or people that deny the First Amendment. I wonder if ObamHOlder could do that since they already march http://senatormark4.org/Alinsky5.htm on a different road from freedom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a politician I admire.  You speak when others are silent. It would be just great if you would implement a simple test to turn this assault on your beliefs on it&#8217;s head. </p>
<p>Simply put, make it a crime to deny the fundamental rights defined in the U.S. Constitution First Amendment.  Denying the First Amendment is surely incitement to barbarism.  Right?</p>
<p>IF you did nothing more than enshrine the First Amendment in your laws it would go further to helping prevent the islamization of Dutch life than any other act.</p>
<p>No visas, NO aid to countries or people that deny the First Amendment. I wonder if ObamHOlder could do that since they already march <a href="http://senatormark4.org/Alinsky5.htm" rel="nofollow">http://senatormark4.org/Alinsky5.htm</a> on a different road from freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billobillo54</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5528482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billobillo54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5528482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JM: Yes, we are His children. God bless you in Jesus&#039; Name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM: Yes, we are His children. God bless you in Jesus&#8217; Name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5528223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5528223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, Jesus Christ,though  dead in the first century CE, is alive now to be the centre of our Life on account of the salvation he provided for us on the cross.

As a result, we belong to a divine Family of which God is the Father and Jesus Christ is a fellow Child with us.

I value being called Bro JM but what would you think that, instead of being called brothers (or sisters), we see ourselves as being Children.

As Children together, we can say, for example, Dear fellow Child JM.

It loses the tribal sense that brother has whilst, at the same time, bringing God the Father into the relationship between two, who would otherwise call themselves brothers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Jesus Christ,though  dead in the first century CE, is alive now to be the centre of our Life on account of the salvation he provided for us on the cross.</p>
<p>As a result, we belong to a divine Family of which God is the Father and Jesus Christ is a fellow Child with us.</p>
<p>I value being called Bro JM but what would you think that, instead of being called brothers (or sisters), we see ourselves as being Children.</p>
<p>As Children together, we can say, for example, Dear fellow Child JM.</p>
<p>It loses the tribal sense that brother has whilst, at the same time, bringing God the Father into the relationship between two, who would otherwise call themselves brothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billobillo54</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5528059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billobillo54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5528059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Bro JM: We disagree on a lot.  I do agree on one thing.  The most important: Jesus Christ is the entirety of our salvation.  To Him be the glory and to Him is all merit and credit for us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Bro JM: We disagree on a lot.  I do agree on one thing.  The most important: Jesus Christ is the entirety of our salvation.  To Him be the glory and to Him is all merit and credit for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sintram</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5528053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sintram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5528053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your full reply, billo. It is really wonderful to find someone else on the internet who rarely cares about these matters, such as the identity of the anti-Christ.

In a way, it is good that we have different understandings of this concept, because we can then talk and discuss.

Firstly, the word &quot;antichrist&quot; only appears in the NT in 1 &amp; 2 John, so that, it seems to me, we should only obtain our understanding of what &quot;antichrist&quot; means from these NT passages.

Secondly, John wrote these verses more than 500 years before Islam existed. 

This means that he, John, did not have Islam in mind when he wrote, for example, &quot;they bring about separation from us, yet they never belonged to us. If they had belonged to us, they would have stood WITH us. Instead, they show that not all of us belong to us&quot; (1 J:2:19).

Thirdly, since Islam cannot be antichrist, like atheists cannot be antichrist, for example, then who is antichrist?

Well, John says that they show, by separating from us, that not &quot;all of us belong to us&quot;.

Fourthly, if they had belonged to us, they would have stood with us.

Fifthly, so we can say that antichrist are those, who are or have been very close to us, who have faith in Christ as Saviour, so close, in fact, that they appeared to have belonged to us for a while - before they separated from us.

Sixthly, John tells us in 1,2:22, what it is that these antichrists do. They fail to show (in their speaking in public) that it is Jesus who is the Messiah. &quot;This is what antichrist is: It is a denial of the Father as well as the Son&quot;.

Seventhly, they talk about all sorts of religious things but they marginalise Christ and, indeed, ignore him when they speak about Christianity.

Eighthly, we can conclude that antichrists come from within the Christian community, pretending to be followers of Christ, but deny him by not speaking about the Name of Jesus Christ when they should.

Ninthly, these antichrists talk about themselves, about their opinions on this and that but, because they don&#039;t talk about Christ, they have got in the way of people knowing about the Messiah. They have put themselves in the place of Christ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your full reply, billo. It is really wonderful to find someone else on the internet who rarely cares about these matters, such as the identity of the anti-Christ.</p>
<p>In a way, it is good that we have different understandings of this concept, because we can then talk and discuss.</p>
<p>Firstly, the word &#8220;antichrist&#8221; only appears in the NT in 1 &amp; 2 John, so that, it seems to me, we should only obtain our understanding of what &#8220;antichrist&#8221; means from these NT passages.</p>
<p>Secondly, John wrote these verses more than 500 years before Islam existed. </p>
<p>This means that he, John, did not have Islam in mind when he wrote, for example, &#8220;they bring about separation from us, yet they never belonged to us. If they had belonged to us, they would have stood WITH us. Instead, they show that not all of us belong to us&#8221; (1 J:2:19).</p>
<p>Thirdly, since Islam cannot be antichrist, like atheists cannot be antichrist, for example, then who is antichrist?</p>
<p>Well, John says that they show, by separating from us, that not &#8220;all of us belong to us&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fourthly, if they had belonged to us, they would have stood with us.</p>
<p>Fifthly, so we can say that antichrist are those, who are or have been very close to us, who have faith in Christ as Saviour, so close, in fact, that they appeared to have belonged to us for a while &#8211; before they separated from us.</p>
<p>Sixthly, John tells us in 1,2:22, what it is that these antichrists do. They fail to show (in their speaking in public) that it is Jesus who is the Messiah. &#8220;This is what antichrist is: It is a denial of the Father as well as the Son&#8221;.</p>
<p>Seventhly, they talk about all sorts of religious things but they marginalise Christ and, indeed, ignore him when they speak about Christianity.</p>
<p>Eighthly, we can conclude that antichrists come from within the Christian community, pretending to be followers of Christ, but deny him by not speaking about the Name of Jesus Christ when they should.</p>
<p>Ninthly, these antichrists talk about themselves, about their opinions on this and that but, because they don&#8217;t talk about Christ, they have got in the way of people knowing about the Messiah. They have put themselves in the place of Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billobillo54</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billobillo54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JM: The Scriptures identify the antichrist.  First, I stated the Islam is the &quot;body&quot; of antichrist.  And, the person of the antichrist will be a Muslim.  Here&#039;s why:
1. 1 John Chapter 2  identifies the antichrist as &quot;he who denies the Son.&quot;  Islam denies the Son at the creedal, foundational, and defining level.  It is a Unitarian heresy with great antagonism toward the Son and the Trinity.
2. In Daniel 9:26 the text states &quot;the PEOPLE of the prince who is to come (i.e. the antichrist) will destroy the Temple...&quot;  This is a clear reference to the Second Temple.  The Hebrew word for &quot;people&quot; is the word &quot;am&quot; which means &quot;ethnic group&quot; or &quot;kindred.&quot;  Josephus reports that the Tenth Legion destroyed the Temple.  It was, according to Josephus, comprised of Turks, Arabs and Syrians.  These are the &quot;people&quot; of the antichrist.
3. Gideon according to Isaiah 9-10 and Psalm 83, is a type of the Messiah.  When Gideon killed the Princes of Midian (i.e. Arabia) he took their crescent ornaments off their camels.
4. In Revelation 20 the Saints are killed during the Tribulation by BEHEADING.
5. The antichrist is referred to as the &quot;King of Babylon&quot; (Isaiah 14), &quot;The King of Tyre&quot; (Ezekiel 28), The harsh ruler of Egypt (Isaiah 19) and &quot;The Assyrian&quot; (Micah 5, et al).  
6. In Revelation Jesus speaking to the Church of Pergamum states they live &quot;where Satan&#039;s throne is.&quot;  Pergamum is in Turkey.
There is a lot more evidence from the Scriptures.  If you are interested I will continue.

Sola Fide Bro]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM: The Scriptures identify the antichrist.  First, I stated the Islam is the &#8220;body&#8221; of antichrist.  And, the person of the antichrist will be a Muslim.  Here&#8217;s why:<br />
1. 1 John Chapter 2  identifies the antichrist as &#8220;he who denies the Son.&#8221;  Islam denies the Son at the creedal, foundational, and defining level.  It is a Unitarian heresy with great antagonism toward the Son and the Trinity.<br />
2. In Daniel 9:26 the text states &#8220;the PEOPLE of the prince who is to come (i.e. the antichrist) will destroy the Temple&#8230;&#8221;  This is a clear reference to the Second Temple.  The Hebrew word for &#8220;people&#8221; is the word &#8220;am&#8221; which means &#8220;ethnic group&#8221; or &#8220;kindred.&#8221;  Josephus reports that the Tenth Legion destroyed the Temple.  It was, according to Josephus, comprised of Turks, Arabs and Syrians.  These are the &#8220;people&#8221; of the antichrist.<br />
3. Gideon according to Isaiah 9-10 and Psalm 83, is a type of the Messiah.  When Gideon killed the Princes of Midian (i.e. Arabia) he took their crescent ornaments off their camels.<br />
4. In Revelation 20 the Saints are killed during the Tribulation by BEHEADING.<br />
5. The antichrist is referred to as the &#8220;King of Babylon&#8221; (Isaiah 14), &#8220;The King of Tyre&#8221; (Ezekiel 28), The harsh ruler of Egypt (Isaiah 19) and &#8220;The Assyrian&#8221; (Micah 5, et al).<br />
6. In Revelation Jesus speaking to the Church of Pergamum states they live &#8220;where Satan&#8217;s throne is.&#8221;  Pergamum is in Turkey.<br />
There is a lot more evidence from the Scriptures.  If you are interested I will continue.</p>
<p>Sola Fide Bro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[billo, I don&#039;t think that Islam can be antichrist.

Islam has nothing to do with Christ nor does it pretend to set itself up in the place of Christ, so it cannot be antichrist.

The &quot;anti&quot; word actually means &quot;in the place of&quot;, so that an antichrist has to appear to be like Christ, to be on Christ&#039;s side, as it were, in order to successfully get in the way of someone looking to Christ directly for himself or herself.

I would suggest that all priests, ministers, pastors, bishops are antichrists, because instead of getting out of the way they intrude upon an individual&#039;s coming to Jesus privately.

Furthermore, they set themselves up as teachers, who are having to teach the &quot;flock&quot; because Christ has left the scene.

But he hasn&#039;t left the scene and he can still Teach the individual.

He, in fact, said to his disciples that you have only ONE Teacher and that is the Messiah.

So, for example, you go to your church service and the priest or minister who stands up to teach is anti-Christ.

How about that then?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billo, I don&#8217;t think that Islam can be antichrist.</p>
<p>Islam has nothing to do with Christ nor does it pretend to set itself up in the place of Christ, so it cannot be antichrist.</p>
<p>The &#8220;anti&#8221; word actually means &#8220;in the place of&#8221;, so that an antichrist has to appear to be like Christ, to be on Christ&#8217;s side, as it were, in order to successfully get in the way of someone looking to Christ directly for himself or herself.</p>
<p>I would suggest that all priests, ministers, pastors, bishops are antichrists, because instead of getting out of the way they intrude upon an individual&#8217;s coming to Jesus privately.</p>
<p>Furthermore, they set themselves up as teachers, who are having to teach the &#8220;flock&#8221; because Christ has left the scene.</p>
<p>But he hasn&#8217;t left the scene and he can still Teach the individual.</p>
<p>He, in fact, said to his disciples that you have only ONE Teacher and that is the Messiah.</p>
<p>So, for example, you go to your church service and the priest or minister who stands up to teach is anti-Christ.</p>
<p>How about that then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I_Am_Me</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I_Am_Me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice ad hominem. Now you should go to a mirror and say sorry to yourself for being stupid and not knowing the difference between Danish and Dutch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice ad hominem. Now you should go to a mirror and say sorry to yourself for being stupid and not knowing the difference between Danish and Dutch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billobillo54</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billobillo54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the entire picture of Bible prophesy indicates that indeed Europeans will oppose the Islamic antichrist.  Daniel 11:29-30:  “At the appointed time he will return and come into the South, but this last time it will not turn out the way it did before. 30 For ships of Kittim will come against him...&quot; &quot;Kittim&quot; refers to Mediterranean Europe. 

From Wikipedia: The expression &quot;isles of Kittim&quot;, found in the Book of Jeremiah 2:10 and Ezekiel 27:6, indicates that, some centuries prior to Josephus, this designation had already become a general descriptor for the Mediterranean islands.[3] Sometimes this designation was further extended to apply to Romans, Macedonians or Seleucid Greeks. The Septuagint translates the occurrence of &quot;Kittim&quot; in the Book of Daniel 11:30 as ῥωμαῖοι (&quot;Romans&quot;). 1 Maccabees 1:1 states that &quot;Alexander the Great the Macedonian&quot; had come from the &quot;land of Kittim&quot;.[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the entire picture of Bible prophesy indicates that indeed Europeans will oppose the Islamic antichrist.  Daniel 11:29-30:  “At the appointed time he will return and come into the South, but this last time it will not turn out the way it did before. 30 For ships of Kittim will come against him&#8230;&#8221; &#8220;Kittim&#8221; refers to Mediterranean Europe. </p>
<p>From Wikipedia: The expression &#8220;isles of Kittim&#8221;, found in the Book of Jeremiah 2:10 and Ezekiel 27:6, indicates that, some centuries prior to Josephus, this designation had already become a general descriptor for the Mediterranean islands.[3] Sometimes this designation was further extended to apply to Romans, Macedonians or Seleucid Greeks. The Septuagint translates the occurrence of &#8220;Kittim&#8221; in the Book of Daniel 11:30 as ῥωμαῖοι (&#8220;Romans&#8221;). 1 Maccabees 1:1 states that &#8220;Alexander the Great the Macedonian&#8221; had come from the &#8220;land of Kittim&#8221;.[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobuyus</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mobuyus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ya let the muslims keep their values theft,rape, murder lying,bestiality,necrophillia and don&#039;t forget child molestation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya let the muslims keep their values theft,rape, murder lying,bestiality,necrophillia and don&#8217;t forget child molestation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yusuf S. Ghazzali</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yusuf S. Ghazzali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am yet to meet an islamophobe who is not fiercely pro-Israel and pro-Zionist.......ample evidence of who funds the islamophobes like this &quot;Danish politician&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am yet to meet an islamophobe who is not fiercely pro-Israel and pro-Zionist&#8230;&#8230;.ample evidence of who funds the islamophobes like this &#8220;Danish politician&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yusuf S. Ghazzali</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yusuf S. Ghazzali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you mean Muslims do not want to &quot;integrate&quot; into Danish society.....do you want to abandon values of faith in God and morality and exchange them with the secular mishmash of relativism preached by Zionists? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean Muslims do not want to &#8220;integrate&#8221; into Danish society&#8230;..do you want to abandon values of faith in God and morality and exchange them with the secular mishmash of relativism preached by Zionists? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FactsRule</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FactsRule]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree with everything else you said, I have to say that your &quot;Prosecuting me as an elected politician for expressing the opinions of my constituents is absurd.&quot; should end with the word evil, not just absurd. 
God bless you, Geert, reward you in this world as well as the unimaginable reward you have waiting in the eternal world to come and save civilization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with everything else you said, I have to say that your &#8220;Prosecuting me as an elected politician for expressing the opinions of my constituents is absurd.&#8221; should end with the word evil, not just absurd.<br />
God bless you, Geert, reward you in this world as well as the unimaginable reward you have waiting in the eternal world to come and save civilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie_Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbie_Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facts don&#039;t matter in cases like this. Your logic falls on deaf ears. Their aim is grasping power by any means, the least of which is deceit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facts don&#8217;t matter in cases like this. Your logic falls on deaf ears. Their aim is grasping power by any means, the least of which is deceit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie_Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbie_Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do I read your article if you put a pop-up ad in front of it that has no escape?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I read your article if you put a pop-up ad in front of it that has no escape?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoJoFo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoJoFo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This prosecution, moreover, is also dangerous. People will begin to lose their trust in the democratic process.&quot;--Geert Wilders


This is what John Adams, our 2nd President, had to say about that: “It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished, for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world that they cannot all be punished.  But if innocence itself is brought to the bar and condemned, perhaps to die, then the citizen will say, &#039;whether I do good or whether I do evil is immaterial, for innocence itself is no protection,&#039; and if such an idea as that were to take hold in the mind of the citizen that would be the end of security whatsoever.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This prosecution, moreover, is also dangerous. People will begin to lose their trust in the democratic process.&#8221;&#8211;Geert Wilders</p>
<p>This is what John Adams, our 2nd President, had to say about that: “It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished, for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world that they cannot all be punished.  But if innocence itself is brought to the bar and condemned, perhaps to die, then the citizen will say, &#8216;whether I do good or whether I do evil is immaterial, for innocence itself is no protection,&#8217; and if such an idea as that were to take hold in the mind of the citizen that would be the end of security whatsoever.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinstonCDN</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WinstonCDN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Europeans are asleep...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europeans are asleep&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Disqus User</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5527002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Disqus User]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5527002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine how much brainwashing it would take to convince the Japanese to 
flood Japan with NON-Japanese until they themselves become a minority

To convince them to force affirmative action AGAINST THEMSELVES with all those NON-Japanese

That this “diversity” is a strength

And to convince them that it would be “racist” to NOT do this to themselves

No need convincing WHITE anti-whites of this in EVERY white country, they’re already convinced

Anti-Racist is a code for Anti-White]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine how much brainwashing it would take to convince the Japanese to<br />
flood Japan with NON-Japanese until they themselves become a minority</p>
<p>To convince them to force affirmative action AGAINST THEMSELVES with all those NON-Japanese</p>
<p>That this “diversity” is a strength</p>
<p>And to convince them that it would be “racist” to NOT do this to themselves</p>
<p>No need convincing WHITE anti-whites of this in EVERY white country, they’re already convinced</p>
<p>Anti-Racist is a code for Anti-White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James_IIa</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/geert-wilders/talking-about-the-moroccan-issue-is-not-a-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-5526945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James_IIa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=247966#comment-5526945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And Wilders will love it to be in court next year. Nothing beats free publicity in election times.&quot;



Possibly true, and if so, my hat is off to him--he makes a forceful display of the inverse intolerance that is aimed at him.


With him in the dock and more &quot;Allahu Akbar&quot; murders happening going into the elections, he may be in a powerful position when the polls close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And Wilders will love it to be in court next year. Nothing beats free publicity in election times.&#8221;</p>
<p>Possibly true, and if so, my hat is off to him&#8211;he makes a forceful display of the inverse intolerance that is aimed at him.</p>
<p>With him in the dock and more &#8220;Allahu Akbar&#8221; murders happening going into the elections, he may be in a powerful position when the polls close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 712/741 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 09:36:11 by W3 Total Cache -->