NY Times Triples-Down as Communist Mouthpiece

new-york-timesThe past 10 days have seen three hysterical editorials from the New York Times pleading for a U.S. economic lifeline to the Castro brothers’ terror-sponsoring regime (i.e. to end the so-called embargo).

It’s the economy, stupid—Venezuela’s that is. Those plummeting oil prices (20% in the past few months) are playing havoc with the Cuban colony’s already-rotten economy.  Venezuelan subsidies to Cuba last year, mostly in the form of essentially free oil, were estimated to total $10 billion. That’s more than double what the Soviets used to send.

But Castro’s Venezuelan puppet Maduro is now on very shaky ground. The only thing keeping this pathetic satrap in power—besides the 30,000 or so Cuban military and security “advisors” essentially running Venezuela—are the bread and circuses that sitting on top of the world’s largest oil reserves allows the Venezuelan regime to put on for Venezuelans.

Now this oil-fueled largesse looks imperiled—and with it the subsidies to Venezuela’s colonial overlords in Havana. Hence the Castro brothers’ desperation for a rescue from U.S. tourists and taxpayers—and the SOS to their regime’s traditional agents-of-influence worldwide, among whom the New York Times features very prominently.

“Fidel Castro…has largely vanished from public view in Cuba,” reads the second NY Times editorial on Oct. 14. “But the 88-year-old former president [italics mine] has not altogether abandoned the business of telling Cubans what to think.”

Is the Times — at long last! — acknowledging a totalitarian streak in the longest-reigning Stalinist dictator of modern history? Sure sounds like it. Now please pay close attention as the editorial continues:

On Tuesday [Oct. 14th], Mr. Castro dedicated a column to an editorial published in The [New York] Times on Sunday [Oct. 11] that called on the Obama administration to restore diplomatic ties with the Cuban government and end the counterproductive [italics mine] embargo the United States has imposed on the island for decades. His take was remarkable for one main reason…quoting nearly every paragraph in the [our] editorial…Hosts of Cuban state-run radio stations [also] read Mr. Castro’s column and discussed its content…

In brief: so closely did the New York Times echo the sentiments of a Stalinist dictator that he gleefully ordered their article disseminated—almost word for word – throughout his regime’s KGB-founded and mentored media. It gets better:

He [Fidel Castro] appeared to endorse the thrust of the editorial,” The second NY Times editorial boasts, “comparing it to an interview he gave in 1957 as a young rebel leader to a [New York] Times foreign correspondent at the time, Herbert Matthews…

In April of 1959 — amidst an appalling bloodbath of Cubans by firing squad ordered by Fidel Castro but mostly administered by his ever-faithful Igor, Che Guevara – Castro made a special visit to the New York Times offices in New York. After a warm greeting from Arthur Hayes Sulzberger, a beaming Fidel Castro personally decorated a beaming Herbert Matthews with a specially-minted medal expressing his bloody regime’s highest honor.

“To our American friend Herbert Matthews with gratitude,” beamed Castro as the flashbulbs popped. “Without your help, and without the help of the New York Times, the Revolution in Cuba would never have been.”

“Fidel Castro has strong ideas of liberty, democracy and social justice,” Matthews had written on the front pages of (at the time) the world’s most prestigious newspaper in February 1957. “But it amounts to a new deal for Cuba, radical, democratic, and therefore anti-communist.”

Herbert Matthews doubled-down a few months later: “This is not a Communist revolution in any sense of the term. Fidel Castro is not only not a Communist, he is decidedly anti-Communist” (Herbert Matthews, the New York Times, July 1959).

Reasonable people might ask: has any tiny little thing transpired in the intervening half-century that might cause the New York Times to regret their enabling of Fidel Castro?

But reasonable people will search in utter vain for any hint of such regret, especially in light of this week’s editorials, which – if anything — double-down on the New York Times’ historical fondness for the Castro regime.

Through their unrivaled (at the time) public relations cachet and their heavy influence with their ideological cohorts and cronies in the CIA and U.S. State Department, the New York Times enabled into power a regime that:

*Jailed and tortured political prisoners at a higher rate than Stalin’s during the Great Terror.

*Murdered more Cubans than Hitler murdered Germans during the Night of Long Knives.

* converted a nation with a higher per-capita income than half of Europe into one that repulses Haitians.

* Wantonly brought the world within a whisker of nuclear war.

Over fifty times as many Cubans have died (and horribly) while attempting to flee Castro’s Cuba as Germans died trying to flee East Germany. And prior to Castroism Cuba welcomed more immigrants per-capita (primarily from Europe) than did the U.S.

And remember, the New York Times, like all anti-embargo propagandists (Chamber of Commerce, Hillary Clinton, Brookings Institute, Cato Institute, etc.), advocates against the so-called embargo by claiming Castro secretly favors it. The embargo — the intellectual eggheads wink and snicker at us knuckle-draggers – gives Castro a foil for his economic failures and an excuse to keep the clamps on. “Don’t you blockheads understand?”

We’re greatly impressed with your erudition and powers of ratiocination, think-tank eggheads. But first off, if Castro “secretly favors the embargo,” then why did every one of his secret agents campaign secretly and obsessively against the embargo while working as secret agents? Castro managed the deepest and most damaging penetration of the U.S. Department of Defense in recent U.S. history. The spy’s name is Ana Belen Montes, known as “Castro’s Queen Jewel” in the intelligence community. In 2002 she was convicted of the same crimes as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg and today she serves a 25-year sentence in federal prison. Only a plea bargain spared her from sizzling in the electric chair like the Rosenbergs.

Prior to her visit from the FBI and handcuffing, Ana Belen Montes worked tirelessly to influence U.S. foreign policy against the embargo. The same holds for more recently arrested, convicted and incarcerated Cuban spies Carlos and Elsa Alvarez and Kendall and Gwendolyn Myers. All of these worked tirelessly to influence U.S. policy against the “embargo”– while working as secret agents.

In brief, the “reasoning” against the so-called embargo by people who fancy themselves intellectuals calls for Rod Serling introducing a Twilight Zone episode:

Imagine if you will … a place where every “prestigious” think-tank (from Brookings to CATO) and every “prestigious” publication (from the New York Times to The Atlantic) denounces the Cuba “embargo” as “Castro’s best-friend, a policy he secretly favors”– even when every one of Castro’s convicted secret agents campaigned secretly and obsessively against the embargo while working as secret agents. On top of that, the KGB-mentored media of Castro’s totalitarian regime makes it a point to reprint every “end-the-embargo” article ever printed in the world, especially those by the New York Times…

Imagine if you will…a place where the institutions that call the embargo “Castro’s best-friend” still manage to be known as think-tanks.”

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • http://johnnyangeladvocacygroup.net JohnnyAngel Advocacy Group

    This paper should be closed for sedition.

    • tickletik

      I disagree. The citizens of a republic have an obligation to inform themselves and to conduct their actions with integrity. It’s our responsibility to both speak the truth and to find it.

      Anyway, I wouldn’t worry about it too much. The corruption of the leftists has wrecked their own educational systems, making them less educated and less intelligent with every year, in addition they are contracepting themselves out of existence (little baby leftists tend to grow up to be big leftists – bless ‘em). The papers readership has been steadily declining, and eventually it will go the way of the Jewish-socialist paper “The Forward”.

      Obscurity and parody.

  • cacslewisfan

    Thanks for this great article. I had to laugh several times because the Left is just so irrational.

    • Bamaguje

      Indeed!!
      Castro wants to trade with USA, yet plotted to nuke it.

    • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

      The New York Times is the same socialist fish wrapper that deliberately whitewashed Stalin’s purges in the 1930s.

  • james connolly

    I’ve never read the New York Times, but I’ve heard it makes excellent toilet paper. May be a little rough, but this is the purpose of the worst newspaper in the world.It’s already full of BULLSHIT, so what’s the harm?

    • tickletik

      It’s also good for wrapping fish. The printers ink adds to the taste!

  • cree

    Venezuela’s socialist economy failing, Cuba wants the embargo lifted (more than it secretly already is). Castro wants/needs capitalism’s wealth but is still in denial that socialism fails. Europe, same outcome. “Transformation,” same outcome.

    When leftists deny that socialism fails, they graduate from their indoctrination with profound insight. Ask Barak Obama.

  • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

    America never should provide aid of any kind including humanitarian aid to a Communist country. Nor should we trade with them let alone grant them “Most favored nation trade status”.

    These are goals of the Communist party in America that are related.

    “4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
    5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
    6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
    7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.”

    • tickletik

      What about the trade with the former Soviet Union? I was told it helped bring it down.

      • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

        If anything it was trade with the west that propped them up when failures of their system occurred such as when their wheat harvest failed and we sold them wheat.

        1. The technological superiority of the NATO ground and air forces plus SDI pushed them into an arms race they could not bear economically. The Soviet doctrine of numbers offsetting quality was destroyed. Plus they endured their own “Vietnam” in Afghanistan.

        2. The disunity due to more than 50% of the Soviet Union being non-Russian.

        3. The “perestroika” or economic reforms failed.

        4. The Communists totally underestimated that “glastnost” which was the granting of free speech would lift the lid off of hatred and rebellion against Communism that had been suppressed for decades.

    • 1Indioviejo1

      We give Vietnam 3 Billion in foreign aid yearly. Go figure.

      • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

        They can send billions of dollars to nations and terrorist organizations such as Hamas that are unfriendly if not downright enemies of America yet they cannot afford a health care program for the American people or even provide the care promised to our veterans.

        • 1Indioviejo1

          Veterans Administration and Obamacare are government programs, therefor they don’t work.

          • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

            You have a valid point there proven by facts.

  • 1Indioviejo1

    It is a two pronged attack masterly orchestrated by Fidel Castro. On the one hand he plays his useful idiot in the so called “think Tanks” spreading disinformation for the stupid masses, “Lift the embargo, don’t give him any excuses”. On the other hand Castor’s agents work to lift the embargo so that Cuba may partake of the American largesse in foreign aid, soft loans easily forgivable, and other goodies from American taxpayers. Only the Communist buy into this Kabuki dance with Cuba.