Stop Giving Obama Radicals the Benefit of the Doubt

samanthapowerIn the Spring of 2011, National Security Council staffer Samantha Power sent emails to top Pentagon officials.  Her emails contained GPS coordinates in Libya.  She demanded that the Pentagon launch immediate air strikes on top of these coordinates, no questions asked. Power, you see, had friends in NGOs on the ground in Libya looking to borrow American might for a moment or two.

Her emails were ignored at the Pentagon.  But her cavalier and hasty email demand that American airmen be launched on a dangerous mission to benefit her friends might seem incompetent and reckless.

But like so much about the age of Obama, Republicans mistake leftist ideology for incompetence.  In the five decades-old orthodoxy of the foreign affairs left, pilots in supersonic jets with laser guided missiles are most appropriately used in small ways, and to serve small causes.  To radicals like Power, American might should be used for their political ends, and the old conventions on target selection, chains of command and strategic aims are obsolete.

So admit it Republicans: you’re confused.  You can’t understand why President Obama’s policies and his nominations are so radical.  It doesn’t make sense, you think, for him to pick extremist nominees who would have radical skeletons that would have disqualified them in any other administration.

You also can’t understand why he continues to lurch left on almost every foreign and domestic issue.

Get over it.  It isn’t 1990 anymore, and leftist radicalism is a prerequisite for jobs in this administration, not a disqualifier.  Leftist radicalism is the administration’s reason for existence.

This is why Obama chose John Kerry as Secretary of State.  Kerry first distinguished himself as a stooge for America’s enemies.  In his first campaign for Congress, Kerry said, “I’m an internationalist. I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.”  He even travelled to Europe to hold talks with North Vietnamese Communists while American soldiers were dying in Vietnam.  His views about American power didn’t moderate over the years, as he continued to aid America’s enemies.  Now he is Secretary of State.

Until the Republican Party understands that these extreme leftist policies and personnel choices are core deliberate features of the Obama era, they will never learn to combat them.

It isn’t enough to express shock that someone like Tom Perez would be nominated as Labor Secretary with his extremist history.  The Obama administration isn’t afraid of your shock and strongly worded letters.  The administration is instead marching forward into a bold future without you.  When they march right over you, they assume you will complain.

What the Obamites are really afraid of, and haven’t seen from most in the Republican Party, are effective counter-attacks to their radicalism.  They are afraid of the most radical policy units inside their government being defunded by the House.  They are afraid of the impeachment of lower-level federal officials who abuse power, such as IRS or DOJ employees, by the House.  They are afraid of rough power being met with rough power.

But the Obamites don’t have much to worry about.  One can’t stop what one can’t even recognize.

Many won’t even attach a name to what we are all witnessing: leftist radicalism.  So step one to effectively stopping Obama is to stop giving his radical nominees and radical policies the benefit of the doubt.


First, purge the word “incompetence” from your lexicon.  Never use it on another Fox News hit.  Never write it again. The Obama administration policies, ranging from Fast and Furious, to the New Black Panther dismissal, to the debacle of Obamacare, are not incompetent follies.  They are instead representative of ideological desires deliberately implemented through the mechanisms of power available to this administration.

Fast and Furious emerged because of hostility to the constitutional right to bear arms.  The New Black Panther dismissal happened because the civil rights industry today doesn’t think civil rights laws should be used against “people of color.”  Every nutty and seemingly dumb Obama policy has a genesis in ideological radicalism.

These and other seemingly dumb Obama administration decisions are features; they are not glitches.  Stop treating them like glitches.

Second, stop assuming we enjoy a measure of immunity from their radical policies because “they would never get away with it.”  History is filled with victims who failed to act in time.  Assuming that America enjoys a unique cultural ability to resist the ideological aims of the new left is a dangerous assumption.

History never stops turning the soil and what seemed impossible not long ago is always possible.  Had you brought up fears in 2005 that the federal government would take over General Motors, shut down coal plants, destroy secured creditor rights of Chrysler bondholders, or taken over the health care system, polite company would have moved to the other side of the room. “Couldn’t happen here,” would have been the response.

Third, listen to what they plainly say they want to do.  What about “fundamentally transform America” didn’t you understand?  What about the numerous open public appearances together with Eric Holder and the radical race hustler Al Sharpton makes you think they are not simpatico?  When radicals say they plan to transform the nation and hobnob (or pardon) the most destructive extremists in America, you better pay attention.

This is not your grandfather’s Democratic Party.

Right now the nomination of Debo Adegbile to run the Justice Department Civil Rights Division is before the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Adegbile was the former NAACP Legal Defense Fund head.  In that role, he oversaw the defense of the cop-killing Black Panther Mumia Abu-Jamal.  The Fraternal Order of Police has demanded that President Obama withdraw the nomination.

Adegbile has pushed every other crackpot racial theory popular among the civil rights industry.  His career has been characterized by attacking school discipline policies and employer background checks as racially motivated.  He fought to keep Abigail Fisher out of the University of Texas Law School merely because she was white.

Just a decade ago, this radical racialist background would have been a disqualifier for any nominee to the Justice Department.  But today, radicalism is a prerequisite for the job.

Adegbile’s racial radicalism is so far from the mainstream that even Democratic senators such as Mark Pryor from Arkansas should question his nomination. Surely even some Democrats have a problem with a man who volunteered to help a black panther who killed a cop?

The radicalism of the administration is on open and continuous display for anyone to see.  Attorney General Holder and President Obama routinely meet with the race hustler Al Shaprton.  Holder has spoken at Sharpton’s National Action Network convention.  Sharpton has been invited to the White House for behind-closed-doors policy debates with top Justice Department officials.

Don’t forget, Sharpton’s past would disqualify him from even obtaining a security clearance.  His racially motivated lies about Tawana Brawley are just a start. He led racially motivated rallies against Jewish-owned Freddie’s Fashion Mart in New York City. Afterwards, Ronald Smith went in with a gun, told the black customers to leave, and then burned the store down killing one.  Sharpton was also the primary instigator of the 1991 Crown Heights riots where Orthodox Jews were attacked randomly and Yankel Rosenbaum was murdered.  Sharpton even led rallies calling Jews “diamond merchants.”

No worries. Sharpton’s past has produced lots of White House invitations and plenty of high profile administration love.  Sharpton is not embraced by the Obama administration in spite of his radical past. He is being embraced because of it.

Yet Republicans seem unable to comprehend this central feature of the age of Obama.

Consider Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. As Jonathan Tobin has noted, Hagel had two qualifications that resulted in his nomination for Secretary of Defense – his distaste for Israel and his willingness to make nice with Hamas and Iran.  Nevertheless, most media outlets focused on Obama’s bipartisan willingness to nominate the former Republican senator from Nebraska.  His extremist views toward Israel were largely ignored.

Obama has profited by extremist actions and the radicalism of nominees being ignored throughout his administration.  The extent of the radicalism places the GOP in unfamiliar territory.  Many in leadership still behave and speak as if they are dealing with a president from the Democratic Party of the Kennedy era.  This impotent response will complete the job for the radicals and ensure the fundamental transformation they seek.  Radicals who are treated like moderates are free to implement policy without scrutiny or exposure.

A small percentage of Americans share the views of the radicals in the Obama administration.  Failing to label radicals as radicals means this deep wellspring of American opposition to their policies will remain untapped. Failing to recognize a radical official as a radical means the administration official enjoys a measure of undeserved mercy.  Assuming that President Obama is unaware of the radical backgrounds of his nominees or the radical policies of his agencies risks our national future.  So stop giving the radicals the benefit of the doubt.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • semus

    Very good. This scratches the surface. Another thing we have to ask is are these Republicans really that dumb? Some may be but surely not all. The fight that’s going to have to happen is going to have two fronts 1) within the Republican party and 2) outside the Republican party. I don’t think there’s time to clean up the Republican party first. These moles are deeply embedded in every institution in this country including the political institutions. Mole is the only appropriate name for them. Who’s going to have the stomach to fight these determined, dedicated, vile people? They’re not going away quietly. If nothing else they’ve proven that. It certainly won’t be people like Boehner, McConnell or any of the Bushs’ they are ‘without’.

    An ideal situation would be if the fight against these traitors began in the Democrat party but we can’t count on that.

    It didn’t start with Obama either it’s just that none of his
    predecessors have had his arrogance or hated this country as much. It’s
    his very arrogance and hatred that could be their undoing.

    • Crassus

      Republicans today are mostly of the Gerald Ford/Bob Michael variety. They are more interested in their golf games and being thrown scraps from the table by Democrats than doing the right thing for their country.

      • semus

        I could be wrong but I still feel Gerald Ford was a good man.

  • truebearing

    Excellent essay! I couldn’t agree more. Obama isn’t incompetent, he simply doesn’t share the same objectives as those who continue to naively believe that a president always wants what is best for the nation. Not this one. Obama has done nothing that can be construed as beneficial to America, which should be everyone’s first clue as to his truly destructive intent.

    Obama is overseeing the nihilistic stage of a Gramscian coup and doing everything in his power to weaken, diminish, and humiliate the United States of America. He also has a virulent racial animus toward the white majority. He despises Jews, conservatives, and Christians. If we hope to continue to live in a free and prosperous democratic republic, the entire nation needs to join in a collective dry heave and expunge him from power.

    We need to make 2014 the year of atonement for the Left. We need to give as much money as possible to resolute, courageous, conservative candidates and we all need to do more than just excoriate the Left on the internet. It is time for all-out action. If you have money, use it or lose it. The Left will strip you to the bone like a school of Piranhas if we don’t succeed in wresting control from their rapacious, evil hands.

    • jackcb

      The truth is, it is exactly my Grandfather’s and Great Grandfather’s Democrat Party! The Democrats have always been corrupt — look back at their history — Tammany Hall, Boss Tweed, the Democrat corruption in Chicago at the turn of the century that is still going on there. C’mon guys, there hasn’t been a time when the Democrats weren’t corrupt. I mention only a FEW of the blatant ones!

      • semus

        There has been corruption forever and to a much lesser extent anti Americanism for a long time. However the anti Americanism has never been to the extent it is now and not as blatant.

      • Crassus

        There’s always been corruption in the Democratic Party (and Republican Party too) but the Dems of yesteryear weren’t all out anti-American like today’s bunch of scum. Harry Truman, Pat Moynihan, Hubert Humphrey, and even George McGovern were decent men who loved their country even though they happened to be Democrats.

        • Nixonfan

          Henry Wallace, Eleanor Roosevelt, Harold Ickes, Frances Perkins, Alger Hiss, Adlai Stevenson, Paul Douglas, Harvard, McGovern, Kerry. Nothing new.

          • semus

            Yes these people were anti American. I still feel that this government is by far the most anti American we’ve ever had. Anti Americanism is a requirement.

          • Joe

            When the Obama Administration sits down to negotiate with Russia, or Iran, there are America haters on both sides of the table.

          • truebearing

            Yes, there have always been communists in this country, some of which having been in positions of power, but we have never had the blatant, arrogantly open admission of adherence to Marxism that we see today.

            Part of the reason we see this blatant Marxism is because our schools have steadily been infiltrated with marxist teachers. Another key reason is that we have seen the advent of a black marxist being elected president with the ability to operate with impunity behind the smokescreen of political correctness. A third reason for we have seen the rise of Marxism in America is the fact that far too many Americans are simply too stupid, lazy, and poorly informed to recognize the consequences.

      • Seek

        I dissent here, Jack. Democrats during earlier periods were less corrupt and certainly less Left-leaning. I remember well. As late as 1990, for example, not one prominent Democrat, not even Barney Frank, was calling for legalization of gay marriage. Now even Republicans like Ann Coulter and Ted Olson are jumping on that bandwagon.

        • jackcb

          A difference of opinion is what makes horseracing. However, if you don’t think Tammany Hall was corrupt, I think it might be a good idea to read your history of Democrat politics in New York City and the South in the 19th and 20th centuries. I’m sure if homosexual marriage were even contemplated at the time, the Democrats would have been in the vanguard for legalization. As for Ann Coulter, she seems to be losing her wits. It started with her “love affair” with Chris Christie, last year. I didn’t know she was now supporting homosexual marriage, as well.

      • Shel_Zahav

        Don’t forget the Ku Klux Klan and the defeat of the Civil Rights Act of 1957.

      • truebearing

        No, there were communists in the Democratic Party, but the majority were liberals who still believed in defending the country. Obama has made the US vulnerable to every enemy imaginable, and that is not something Democrats of the past would have done…except for Carter, who is still far superior to Obama, as frightening as that may sound.

      • veeper

        The democratic affinity for corruption and control is what allowed the communist to infiltrate so easily…..

    • Nixonfan

      The Gramscian coup dates from 1927 when the Sacco-Venzetti trial was used to by the liberal media advance the communist perspective on American democracy. It has steadily spread outward and inward to the point that modern textbooks read like Howard Zinn. The good news is that the Right has finally learned how to fight back.

      • truebearing

        It appears we have reached the point in the coup where Gramsci believed a short, violent struggle was necessary to complete the revolution. When the Left is longer hiding their identities and agenda, you know they think the revolution is a fait accompli.

        • Nixonfan

          I appreciate your concerns, but they are premature. Romney almost won the last election, the GOP controls the House, and the GOP leads the generic ballot. France is an example of a country where Gramsci’s march is almost over. The only economics they teach is marxian, and ditto for history. France is beyond saving; the anglosphere is nowhere near there. Look at Harper and Abbott, both truly great men.

          • truebearing

            The GOP controls the House, but John Boehner is trying to pass Amnesty which will give the Left a permanent majority. They will then continue the Open Society Institute’s — the Soros flagship organisation — agenda of open borders, legalization of all drugs, and subordination of the US to a global gevernment, ie. the UN.

            For control of the House to have any positive effect, the Republican leadership has to be willing to defund key areas within Obama’s criminal administration, but they aren’t even close to that level of courage.

            The Left may be on rocky ground in Framce, but Islam is on the rise, thanks to too many years of leftist governance. The threat from who the Left allows in a country may now be greater than rule by the Left, if that is possible.

    • vladimirval

      I am afraid that Obama is dumb as a sack of nails. He has no accomplishments in his wake besides being a snake oil salesman with the ability to fool so many people most of the time. He is just the spokesman for the string pullers responsible for the decaying of America. That does not excuse him of guilt in that effort. If he really is a born American citizen then he is guilty of treason.

      • truebearing

        He was chosen by the Left because he is part white, part black; part marxist, part Muslim; part hetero, part homo. He is a creation of identity politics. He was chosen for his ability to lie with a smile on his face. He was chosen because he has no conscience.

        I wouldn’t say Obama is dumb, but he clearly isn’t the genius the media wanted us to believe he is. He is fairly intelligent and a very gifted liar, but his strongest characteristic is his Black Hole narcissism.

  • Silver Garcia

    Caroline Glick ”

    Ya’alon criticized Kerry’s so-called security plan that offers Israel advanced technology in exchange for PLO control over its eastern border. Ya’alon rejected the notion that the PLO is interested in making peace.

    Ya’alon said that Kerry’s razor-sharp focus on Israel and the PLO owes to an “incomprehensible obsession,” and Kerry is exhibiting “messianic” character traits.

    State Department spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki lashed out at Ya’alon saying, Secretary Kerry and his team, including General John Allen, have been working day and night to try and promote a secure peace for Israel, because of the secretary’s deep concern for Israel’s future.”

    These words, play into the anti-Jewish stereotype according to which Jews are quarrelsome but hapless wretches.

    The flipside of this stereotype is the all-powerful Jewish conspiracy that manipulates non-Jews into doing its dirty work”.

    Kerry and Obama are working hard to be on a Muslim Payroll a la Jimmy Carter.

  • tic…tic…BOOM

    And who are the Republican “leaders”? Boehner, McConnell, Preibus, McCain, Cantor, Ryan and Romney. Get rid of them and put Cruz, Rand Paul Chafetz, Lee and real conservatives in charge. They will not play “pitty pat”, with the democrat pajama boys. It is close to too late.

  • wildjew

    Christian Adams wrote: “Until the Republican Party understands that these extreme leftist policies and personnel choices are core deliberate features of the Obama era, they will never learn to combat them….”

    I think my party is nearly finished. I cannot pin all the fault on RINO’s Boehner, McConnell, Preibus, McCain, Cantor, Ryan, etc. I think the problem lies in the Republican party base itself that enables these RINOs. When I saw the Republican party base choose “Islamist” (jihad) enabler and sympathizer / chameleon, Mitt Romney as their 2012 nominee (championed by none other than Rush Limbaugh) what else can I conclude but that we are nearly finished? Ann Coulter, another smart woman, throws her support to “Islamist (jihad) enabler Chris Christie. This “bridge-gate” thing should be seen as a God-send to conservatism. One more jihad-sympthizer is in trouble. But is it? No. Sean Hannity has jihad-sympthizer, Chris Christie’s back as do millions of rank and file ‘conservatives’ and Republicans! Given what we’ve seen, I doubt the Republican Party will “understand” what hit them / us until it is too late. “Radical” abolitionist Republicans in the 19th century would not recognize the party they built..

  • veeper

    This is your grandfathers democratic party fully under the control of the 1930s communist….

    The same people that Sen. Joe McCarthy warned America about….

    The same people that have been infiltrating government, education and the democratic party since ww2….

    The same people that have been infiltrating the republican party since the 70s….

    Americans are experiencing the very government that the founding fathers wrote about and warned the people about…..

    It has fallen to present day americans to sacrifice to save this country and the freedom of americans…..

    Freedom is not free…..never has been ….never will be…..

    The price of freedom is personal sacrifice…..

    I do not see present day americans as willing to pay that price …..

    • Wolfthatknowsall

      I understand the sense of despair that pervades your comment. There are more Americans, than ever before, who are willing the pay the ultimate price for their liberties.

      • veeper

        No sense of despair…..

        Just the truth…..

        present day americans lack the ability to fully fathom the statement…..

        Give me liberty…or give me death….

        present day americans have issues with missing a football game, TV show or even voting…..

        • gray_man

          OK, they will give you death.
          Now what are YOU doing, besides chanting slogans.

          • veeper

            I am NOT being a coward…..

            what are YOU doing…..

            besides a coward and trolling websites to disrupt……

          • gray_man

            Who said you were being a coward?
            What am I doing?
            Well I’m not spouting slogans.
            I did spend 20+ years in special operations,
            so I know how to defend against my enemy.
            And make no mistake, the government is my enemy.
            Anything else I am doing is not for discussion on a web site, do you not know anything about the NSA?
            The first thing you learn is not to attract attention to yourself, spouting slogans.
            I don’t know where you got the idea I thought you a coward, and I can’t conceive of how you interpreted my comment to be cowardice.

          • veeper

            is that you…..james bond?

    • Drakken

      I never thought that I would ever say this, but, the public has done this to themselves through apathy, self indulgence, and complete utter ignorance as long as they can get their goodies. Comrade Obummer now has brought all this to the forefront of our thought process, it has been coming for years, it is now here and it is our fault. If Hildabeast gets the nod, she will get elected and this country is over and no matter what the repubs put up to fix this nation it will be too late. Frankly speaking, I think the next Republic should be only veterans should be citizens for they are the only ones it seems who will take that responsibility seriously.

  • Yulia Demkin

    “Assuming that President Obama is unaware of the radical backgrounds of his nominees…”

    Obama himself has a radical background.

    • Ethan

      Everything about Obama’s background is rather FUZZY, not radical. I’m not arguing that Obama isn’t radical; rather, I would make the point that if his fuzzy background was brought into focus, his ineligibility for the job of POTUS would become clear for all to see.

      • Yulia Demkin

        Not quite true:

        He was a member of a radical church for 20 years.
        He was a community organizer–a polite term for a radical.
        His mother was a radical.
        His grandparents were radicals
        His boyhood mentor, Frank Davis, was a radical.
        His HLS mentor, Demrick Bell, was a radical.
        He worked for the radical group ACORN.

        You can say there is some fuzzyness in his background, but there is more than enough there to say his background was radical.

  • ColinFlaherty

    required reading.

  • Cappy1437

    Thank you for excellent information. I have been guilty of using the word incompetent and for that I am sorry. Republicans need to fight back in ways we’re not used to. Start with what you said, ” This is not your Grandfather’s Democratic Party,” and then come out with the truth of this leftist radicalism and fight hard. Educate people with the truth. All they’re hearing is leftist propaganda. Keep blasting the mainstream media. It is difficult to believe this is happening in America but the truth is we have so many dumbed down low information voters who don’t know anything and don’t really care. They’re content with the status quo because they don’t know better. Tell them what is happening. Get the word out about this leftist radicalism and how they are destroying our country. Make us proud!

  • Ruckus_Tom

    This is a good article. Obama and his and his administration’s choices should be called out when they are outside the interests / legalities of Americans.

    Unfortunately, Obama is America’s first BLACK president. Anybody piping up to complain about decisions he makes is tagged as a RACIST.

    • veeper

      Even the few numbers of blacks around the country speaking out about obama’s agenda and actions are labeled “Racist”…..

      Used to be “Uncle Toms”……now they are just RACIST……

      • laura r

        maybe the word will lose its power. say something enough times & it rolls over you like water.

      • dennis x

        No, they’re still uncle toms.

    • Omar

      Obama is a mixed-race president. He is half-black and half-white. Even within his black African heritage, he is not directly related to the historical African diaspora in the Western Hemisphere (the president’s father was from Kenya, which is located in East Africa, while the ancestors of most black people living in the Western Hemisphere came from West Africa. You can use the same argument to discredit the so-called Kwanzaa “holiday”). His mother was an American who was directlydescended from Europe, not Africa. Hence, the president is mixed-race.

  • alericKong

    Take away Obama’s superpower, high voter turnout, by running a far-left radical like Van Jones or Sheila Jackson Lee along with a established white politician like Hillary Clinton or Andrew Cuomo. Dems already have a big enough problem with their awful performance, and trying to prop up declining turnout even when the first black president is still on the ticket.

    Then take someone who will turnout conservatives and move him to the center. He doesn’t need to have a vision. Campaign focused on management and job performance will go over well.

  • Sgt Maj

    Well written research that we are talking about the “enemy within.”
    Libs took American on the path to destruction by electing the Chicago thug the first time and believed his nonsense a second time.
    No lesson was learned after eight years of the Arkansas Sleazeball, the impeached, disbarred, perjurer who stole the White House furniture on his way out the door.
    American voters with good sense cannot let it happen again with Shrillary who was an Alinsky-worshipper way before the thug even knew how to spell socialism.
    We’ve suffered enough liberalism to last a lifetime!
    And we have to dump Nancy Botox and DIngy Harry, too!

    • Wolfthatknowsall

      Indeed, Hitlery’s collge senior thesis dealt with Alinsky’s methods and how to implement them more efficiently.

  • Tradecraft46

    When people realize that despite their appearance of goodwill, they believe the ends justify the means, something that is completely counter to our culture.

    The only way to combat it is simply to note that fact, and hold them responsible for their crimes. They are not the ‘merry prankster’ but murderous stalinist, and the soon we realize that and act on that truth the better.

    • Drakken

      Always fight fire, with napalm.

  • Crassus

    The hardcore Left has completely taken over the Democratic Party. In today’s Democratic Party LBJ and JFK would be considered right wing extremists. Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern would be a pair of stodgy old moderates who need to be primaried out of their seats by more “progressive” Democrats.

  • Marty

    It’s only fitting that the party of slavery, treason, the ku klux clan, and bull connor should end controlled by the soft totalitarianism of the morally bankrupt left.

    • laura r

      things changed since slavery. dont play that card, its a cheap shot.

      • Andrew Nelson

        Whereas treason and fraud in this admin are nothing but the current topic.

        • laura r

          of cause. but the party went through 3 major changes. the most significant (which affects us) is the last 25yrs. we were around when it was ok. talking about slavery is a waste of time. its what al shapton does to bring out a point. which ofcause is ludicris because hes a left wing dem.

  • Nixonfan

    You give them way too much credit. There is no grand conspiracy. This is the same leftist Wallace-Stevenson-McGovern-Carter-Clinton crowd. They’ve been fellow-travelers since the New Deal. The only new angle is divisive racist identity politics which is driving the white vote out of the party. I do not fear this gang.


      Maybe you should. They are wider and deeper than you seem to know. i have watched from the inside out. They are all in agreement at some level, seemingly reaching for some kind of perfection here on earth.

  • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

    Stop giving Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama) the benefit of the doubt. I cannot believe that many conservatives believe that this man is incapable of using fraudulent documents as a means to usurp the office of the POTUS. Sometime in March 2014 the world will finally know the truth about this man and the Conservative media will be caught with their pants down. What a shame! Frontpage should be included in that group which has refused to cover the scandal of the century. Whatever happens in March will be the ignition that blows over into a HUGE march on Washington organized by top retired military men called Operation American Spring. We are coming for this Fraud in Chief and others, which include Boehner and McConnell who have failed to investigate this usurper.

  • Kevin Lee

    Horse thieves and liars- Hang em all ! Nothing glen beck wasn’t crying 6 years ago. Seems he was right.

  • vladimirval

    I agree, the opposition to the Marxists, Socialists, Islamists, and others determined to ruin our Republic are being made creditable by those who insist on debating them on details of every one of their agendas. Obamacare is a Trojan horse disguised as a health care act. It is a means of implementing more socialist control of the people, period. That should be our focus of attention. The institution of restrictions by the EPA have one foal in mind. To control US economy by the government top down. More and more gun controls are tactics used by socialist style dictator wannabes throughout history. Obama is not the architect of the demise of freedom and liberty in America, he is just the front man for the string pullers that put him in the position he is in. However without him these evil people are more or less powerless without him and his snake oil salesman ability to fool the people. We can make him ineffective by voting in a veto proof Congress of true patriots. Then in 2016 we can send him out of any government involvement. We can and must save the Republic.

  • A Z

    “In the Spring of 2011, National Security Council staffer Samantha Power sent emails to top Pentagon officials. Her emails contained GPS coordinates in Libya. She demanded that the Pentagon launch immediate air strikes on top of these coordinates, no questions asked”

    That is scary. She should have been fired immediately. Instead she was promoted. So her boss, Obama, should be fired also.

    If this had been known before the 2012 election would the American people have fired her boss?

  • A Z

    ” The Obama administration isn’t afraid of your shock and strongly worded letters. ”

    Correct. The Republican effort by elected officials has to go beyond votes and fund raising letters..

    they (the elected officials) and us (the people) have to be in a permanent campaign mode We need to bring back the committees of correspondence via blogging, twitter, coffee houses or whatever it takes.

    Obama was willing to use thanksgiving to campaign for ObamaCare. We have to do the same.

    I t may seem harsh to bring this up for a few minutes over Superbowl weekend or at other times but can you see the LEFT getting rid of NASCAR?

    They are so dedicated to AGW, I do see them trying to get rid of NASCAR.

    • Erudite Mavin

      Yes, and Obama has ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, PBS as his cheerleader. This is Obama’s campaign org.
      I hear you on going further to get out the message.
      I am face to face with many daily on the issues,
      A matter of not a full body tackle but the opening right now is Obama Care and their disgust at now paying 3 to 4 times more on their premium
      and loss of their Drs.
      My opening to explain who and what directed this.

  • Erudite Mavin

    Powers and her husband, Neo Marxist Cass Sunstein is typical of the people Obama has surrounded himself with from day one and Republicans like me knew
    from Obama’s run in 08, his 2nd term would be 1,000 times worse.

    Too bad the sit at home and third party voters did not have a problem with Obama
    and now whining about Obama’s disasters. It isn’t like you were warned.

    People like that don’t learn and will sit at home or vote third party to eneble Hillary’s win in 2016.

    We also have to look forward to Iran now sending their ships in the open Atlantic
    while China is doing the same in the Pacific

  • Nabuquduriuzhur

    Finally someone in the media gets it!

    Thank you!

    I wrote this back in 2007 for Global Warming, Challenged:

    “16.4 International Socialism

    Modern international socialism is similar to fascism/national socialism, differing only in scope. International socialism is not national, as in the German Volk (people) of Nazi ideology, but rather the entire world is seen as “needing” socialism to survive. At least that is the excuse— the real reason for pushing international socialism is the desire for power. This government philosophy has become very popular in Europe, parts of the United States and Canada, and has become more and more radical in recent years. Some of the United States’ environmental groups, many of the modern Democrat Party leadership and so-called “anarchist” groups are international socialist in philosophy.

    International socialism seeks a world government, disdains national boundaries and individuals, wanting the whole of humanity to embrace their ideals of socialism. Violence and protest are used as tools, while at the same time the leadership denounces violence, just as prior socialist movements used violence and protest while proclaiming innocence. International socialism uses the same methods of propaganda and scapegoating that fascism/national socialism does. Progressives demonize the center/right and Christians, much as the National Socialists demonized the Jews and dehumanized the Slavs.

    The dehumanizing rhetoric supporting abortion used by progressives is illustrative of socialism in statements about the developing baby such as “it’s not human”, “it’s better off dead”, etc.. The same arguments were used by Hitler and the National Socialists in regards to the Jews in Europe from 1919-45. The National Socialists of Germany’s Weimar Republic of 1930 represent the closest historic parallel to the current state of the international socialists in world politics. This is truly frightening.

    With International Socialism, one has all of the evils of the Italian Fascists and German Nazis, but with one additional disadvantage— unlike the Nazis, the International Socialists have no loyalty to their own countries, or indeed, anyone but themselves, being completely selfish and self-absorbed.

    Some progressives and environmentalists of this branch of socialism have begun advocating reducing the world population to 300 million and sometimes even 100 million, depending upon the individual asked. They usually digress on how this will be accomplished and when pressed, speak of methods that are truly evil, such as withholding food or medical aid to nations with large populations, or even deliberately spreading diseases to kill whole populations. That would be unspeakably criminal. It would be best for both our nation and the world if the international socialists didn’t progress further. God willing, the world will see them for what they are and what they want to do.”

    No one then wanted to admit what the Democrats and their allies in the EU, Canada, Venezuela, and elsewhere had become.

    Seems to me that Cuomo just the other day demonized Christians and Conservatives.

  • DTM

    It is an open and continuous display – but it is a dare to the American people to do anything about it. Obama and his criminals know the republicans won’t. Impeach the first black president? Obama knew this was and is his ace card – never happen in the politically correct America. Democrats worked and planned for an Obama for decades.

  • tanstaafl

    Remember in November.

    • Jane Dough

      Won’t matter. Dems have already stolen Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida and Michigan.

      For some inexplicable reason Republicans refuse to embrace voter fraud as a political tactic. So they keep losing. Elections don’t matter anymore.

  • Nabuquduriuzhur

    I can’t say I appreciate censoring my comment. Having made statements about this type of socialism and what it wants to accompish back in 2007 and quoted it in my comment, it made no sense to censor the comment.

    Please be a little more honest, Frontpage. As one of the few outfits still trying to get the truth out there, it’s not appropriate to your mission to censor it on your own website.

  • Ellman48

    “I’m an internationalist. I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.”

    During the American Revolution there were very few successes to celebrate. Time and again it appeared the George Washington and his rag tag army were on a verge of irreversible defeat. Yet in agony and grief, without food or adequate clothing or medical care, they persevered, and trusted in God.

    Today we are facing threats even more serious than they faced and our liberation army is as weak, or weaker, than was General Washington’s. I wonder if the nation will once again be saved only by the Grace of God, but another George Washington would certainly be helpful.

    When someone like John Kerry can become Secretary of State, a former collaborator with Vietnamese communists, a traitor willing to surrender our sovereignty to the hapless UN, then God may be our only salvation, for the nation is bordering on insanity.

    • camp7

      Not to mention barry’s (Persian) senior advisor Valerie Jarret.

      Good points.

  • Ellman48

    “But the Obamites don’t have much to worry about. One can’t stop what one can’t even recognize.”

    This is what I find most astonishing and incomprehensible, that they don’t “recognize” who and what they’re dealing with! I think immediately back to Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler meeting in Munich to “save peace in our time”. How could Chamberlain have been so oblivious to the monster he was dealing with? I may go to my grave with that question unanswered.

    • camp7

      Could just be denial, a condition in which someone will not admit that something sad, painful, etc., is true or real because it contradicts their ideology. Or maybe just plain cognitive bias.

      Still makes a sane person wonder…

  • 11bravo

    I just want a damn JOB!!
    I can’t wait for this guy to be history. I am stuck with too many family ties in IL, and we are dying here. Storefronts all over the state have been closed for 3 years now. I would like to think the radical left would have mercy and stop the counter-prosperity policies. I fear this is their intended goal.
    I think if we get a Cruz in the presidency we may still be able to go into the archives and convict, if not totally humiliate these socialists and their ideology. But we all know the Roves of the world are political animals – and pussies!!

  • DaCoachK

    Democrats are all self-serving-ego-driven fools. Ann Coulter said of them once something to the effect of, “Democrats would like to help in the War on Terror, but that would put them on the side of America–and they won’t stand for that.” These people are despicable. I don’t associate with anyone who votes Democrat, nor do I have any desire to do so. I have disowned family members who have done such. I despise these people and cannot wait for this “peace craze” to blow over.

  • ConcernedCitizen999

    Why shilly-shally around with the term “radicalism”?
    Many of the fatal projects being advanced and implemented by Obama today were initiated by our Communist mortal enemies during the Soviet era.
    Exploiting the racial faultline, flooding the country with hostile aliens with no allegiance to our country or religion, government contol of the economy with Obamacare and other takeovers, purging the military, unilateral disarmament, exporting jobs and whole industries and on and on…
    The Soviet Union might have gone bankrupt, but if you think that their supporters and agents in this country gave up on their dream and ceased their efforts to carry out a slow motion coup d’etat and transform this country into their demonic utopia, then just look at the gang in the White House.
    Communism is the “fundamental transformation of the nation…”, the “change you can believe in” that Obama has already gone so far to bring about.

  • The_Questman

    I’ve been preaching this for almost 20 years. No one listens. There is no Democrat Party. They have become the new Communist Party. They use Alinsky tactics at every turn and the Communist Manifesto is their agenda guide. These super liberals make up approx 20% of the Population yet at this time they control all of the United States. They infest the halls of the Federal, State & Local Governments, like cockroaches. Their views and agenda are being forced on us. From ObamaCare to their hatred of religion it is right out of the Communist Manifesto. It’s why I’ve encouraged people to read it, the Tenets of Communism, and The Road to Serfdom. I never thought it would take this long for people to finally start writing about it. Only in the last year or so have mainstream pundits started to espouse the dangers our country is in. This Revolution however; has been in the making for the last 50 years. Why do you think only Democrat Politicians, including Obama, are endorsed election after election, by the Communist Party? Their agenda’s are identical.

  • darylj46

    It doesn’t take a genius to see what Obama is doing. Three things as one is to bring unrest in the country to claim martial law, another is to destroy America as he promised on his fathers grave and lastly to make a communist muslim agenda to take over then abolish the communist agenda with a muslim take over. Islam allows for them to lie and deceive to get to their goal. This isn’t so hard to see if one looks at not only his indoctrination in his youth but in his adult life. First he was indoctrinated with communism by a mentor then with the Pivins ideology and then with communistic ideology by the one terrorist that promoted his senate race in his livingroom. Now, how hard is it to see.

  • MMinCC

    1700 Marxists were able to gain the levers of power and take over Russia in 1917. They went on to murder 10s of Millions “for the collective”

    Don’t think for one second that if these communists now controlling the Federal government could do that without a wholesale rebellion, they wouldn’t because they would.

    In a heartbeat.

    They hate us. If they can’t control every facet of our lives they’d just as soon cattle car us.

  • bittman

    Just remember that Bill Ayers (who now admits that Obama’s political kickoff happened at a party in Ayers’ house) belonged to the Weather Underground terrorist group. An FBI agent who infiltrated Ayers’ terrorist group testified that in a discussion among the WU members, the FBI undercover agent asked what they would do if they were successful in their revolution. Their response was that they would set up retraining camps across the country. When asked what they would do with those Americans who were “untrainable”, they indicated they would be willing to kill up to 30 million Americans. — proving that Communists all over the world are willing to kill millions of people to achieve “equality for the collective”. Yet, if you look at the Communist countries across the world, the political elites in these countries are always tremendously wealthy, and the regular people are always extremely poor. The Socialist countries’ leaders are only less wealthy and their regular people are just less poor than Under Communism. Only with Capitalism can the American Dream prevail.

  • Marty Robinson

    YOU have to take your own advice Mr. Adams. You keep giving the to the GOP Leadership the benefit of the doubt, as if they will listen or change if they did. You have to understand that they aren’t just a bunch of stubborn old fools, they are RINO’s who are just as radical as those in the those in the Obama administration. Why else would they go along with the Dem’s so often and then turn around and attack their own party with such zeal? They cannot be reasoned with, they can only be replaced.