Inconvenient Truths about Race & Slavery


201102_108_Slavery_art“The truth is harsh.”

So spoke the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, back in the 19th century.

On no topic is the truth harsher than on that of race.

The Eric Holders of the world incessantly bemoan the absence of an “honest discussion of race” in America.  But such a discussion, beginning, as it must, with a discussion of slavery, is actually the last thing that they could afford to have, for such a discussion would include facts that would undermine much of the ideologically-invaluable conventional wisdom concerning this topic.

For instance, the very word “slave” stems from “Slav,” i.e. a reference to the experience of millions of (white) Slavish people who endured centuries of slavery at the hands of African Muslims.   This, of course, is a most inconvenient truth, for it is a most Politically Incorrect truth.  But it is the truth.

Yet the Slavish aren’t the only whites who spent centuries in captivity: Europeans of various backgrounds were enslaved by African Muslims as well.  All of this is heavily documented in such neglected pieces of scholarship as Robert Davis’s Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800 and Paul Baepler’s White Slaves, African Masters: An Anthology of American Barbary Captivity Narratives. 

Nor is it just that millions of whites in Europe were made to toil in bondage for hundreds of years.  Don Jordan’s White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America and Michael Hoffman’s They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America impeccably establish that whites were enslaved in colonial America as well.   Moreover, these brave authors show that the conditions that whites, including, most tragically, white children, had to endure both en route to the colonies as well as once they arrived were at least as dreadful as those experienced by Africans.

This last point would as well be included in an honest discussion of slavery.  The word “kidnapping” that is so often, but erroneously, used to describe the circumstances that allegedly resulted in the transportation of Africans to the New World derives from the fact that British children—kids—were regularly “nabbed’ off of the streets of England and sold into slavery in America.  

An honest discussion of race would mention what no less a figure than black Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates recently discovered: free blacks were in America before slavery.  While researching the book and documentary The African-Americans: Many Rivers to Cross, Gates admits to having been shocked to discover that blacks freely came to America, to Florida, as early as 1513—over 100 years earlier than the standard date of 1619.  And the one black man whose name is now known was a conquistador who came in search of the Fountain of Youth with Ponce de Leon.

Gates also notes that it is simply not true that blacks didn’t become aware of Christianity until they were enslaved by Europeans.  Many Africans who were eventually sold to Europeans—at least one out of four—came from the Kingdom of Angola, where they had been converted to Roman Catholicism as early on as the 15th century.

Gates delivers a double whammy to the orthodox line on race and slavery in America when he reveals both that it was the “African elites” who “converted” the African masses to Christianity and that it was these same elites—not European abductors—who sold their fellow black Africans into slavery across the Atlantic.

Of the 12.5 million Africans sold during the era of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, Gates further observes, only about 388,000 were shipped to America.

An honest discussion of race in America would include the fact that whites were slaves, for sure, but it would also have to accommodate the obscene truth that as many as 4,000 free black families owned slaves in the antebellum South. More stunning still is that, arguably, the first slave master in early America was a black man.

Anthony Johnson—a name, doubtless, of which few people today, black or white, would have heard—was an Angolan who was first sold by Africans to Arabs before winding up as an indentured servant in Virginia. There, he attained his freedom, became a planter, and acquired his own indentured servants. One of the latter, John Casor, a black man, served his mandatory seven years—but Johnson refused to set him free. Through a long, windy series of court battles, Johnson succeeded in prevailing upon the courts to declare Casor Johnson’s servant for lifeSlavery was born, as this was the very first time in the colonies when it was legally determined that a person who had committed no crime had to spend the rest of his remaining existence in bondage.

We are a long ways off from having a truly honest discussion of race.  Now we see why.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Larry Larkin

    Not to mention that many of those “African elites” were already muslims and just opening another slave trade market to supplement the one they were already running that sent black Africans across the Sahara to slavery in the Mahgreb, Egypt, and the Middle East.

  • UCSPanther

    I, like many people, am getting weary of the wailing over slavery.

    No one who was directly victimized by slavery is alive today, as it was outlawed in the US about 150 years ago, and even earlier in the British Commonwealth, and few people who were directly victimized by the Jim Crow laws are alive today. The history is set in stone, and no one can change it.

    It is no more than an excuse to demand more handouts because of some dubious victimhood status.

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      And white Americans fought the bloodiest war ever fought on US soil, in order to abolish slavery here.

      • sprinklerman

        Americans of every race fought to abolish slavery including about 110,000 KIA, a total of 360,000 Union troop died in the war and about 275,200 were wounded during the conflict. Seems that the “debt owed” has been paid in blood many times over.

      • Steve Fair

        This is absolute insanity. The South declared war on their own nation in order to PRESERVE slavery. The Civil War was about preserving the union.

        • tagalog

          After the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, about a year and a half after the war started, the American Civil War was principally about abolishing slavery AND preserving the Union. The Civil War went on in full swing for another year and a half.

          • Steve Fair

            Bullsquat. Lincoln said that if he could preserve the Union without freeing the slaves he would. The Emancipation Proclamation was essentially about destabilizing the Southern economy and weakening their will.

          • American Patriot

            Then why did John Wilkes Booth assassinate Lincoln? Booth himself admitted that he assassinated Lincoln because he freed the slaves and defeated the South. Over the course of the war, Lincoln made it clear that abolishing slavery was one of the key goals in the Civil War. Quit repeating Communist propaganda, you a**hole. Why don’t you denounce people like Fidel Castro, who as the longest-served dictator in the Western Hemisphere, jailed Eusebio Penalver, who was the longest-served black political prisoner in modern history (yes, even longer than Nelson Mandela)? While Mandela served 27 years in South Africa’s former apartheid regime’s prison system, Penalver served 28 years in Communist Cuba’s justice system. Why don’t you denounce Stokely Carmichael, who referred to civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. as “Uncle Martin”. Why don’t you condemn all of the hate groups on the radical left, like the Black Panther Party, the Nation of Islam and other similar groups?

          • Steve Fair

            Sorry FOOL. I don’t denounce on your command. I happen to greatly admire both Kwame Toure and the original Black Panther Party. Why don’t YOU denounce the Tea Party, the Aryan Nation, American Renaissance, Jared Taylor, Ann Coulter and David Horowitz since you want to place this game.

          • UCSPanther

            Do you admire the way Huey Newton died: A drug addled loser who did time for possession, and got shot down by a BLACK drug dealer for failing to pay his drug debts.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            C’mon now, Rufus, it was just two brothas’ ‘keeping it real’.

          • dennis x

            The way he died was tragic. He was by no means perfect, however the way he lived his life was admireable

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Good Lord, you’re a foolish man!!

          • American Patriot

            So you admire a racist black nationalist who destroyed the traditional civil rights movement and smeared its leader as an “Uncle Tom”, but attack black conservatives who are concerned about the well being of the American people. By the way, David Horowitz and the Freedom Center have criticized Jared Taylor and American Renaissance for being scientific racists. The Tea Party is not a racist organization. It is a patriotic organization that advocates for responsible government working within its means. Why don’t you denounce Occupy Wall Street, which serves as recruitment centers for black supremacists, Communists, Islamists, Baathists and other likeminded radicals?

          • charles johnston

            Boy, you just lump them all together without a clue what they stand for or what they have done. Just like a little commie frog in your puddle barking to all the other mindless frogs saying you are the most intelligent because you bark the loudest. You’ve been had, like a lot of folks who only read what reinforces the views they already have. Sad. Amusing, but sad.

          • Roywil

            Hey, Lincoln “misspoke.” Then he “evolved.”

          • pneville

            It was also to neutralize England which was in the beginning of a Abolitionist movement but would have liked to divide the US and aid the Southerners. Once Abe freed the slaves England’s hands were tied

          • MilHisTom

            Steve, with all due respect, you are playing with facts. It’s a postmodern habit to cherry-pick history for facts that only support a current narrow political view without considering the broader body of facts that place the past in context. What you have stated is correct, but only partially–it’s half the truth.
            In 1862 Lincoln said: “My paramount object in the struggle is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery.” He went on to say, “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would do that.” (Lincoln appears to have adopted this third path..leaving slaves alone in border states for fear of losing their allegience to the South). In 1862 Lincoln knew he was in a weak position militarily to do anything, so strategically emancipation made sense to hurt the South at their military / economic base. But make no mistake, Lincoln abhored slavery, but as Commander in Chief had so much more to think about.
            Within the Republican Party Lincoln shared the middle ground between abolishionists who saw the only way to end slavery was to defeat the South militarily, on the one hand, and those on the other end of the party who wanted slavery to end, but felt that a peaceful voluntary freeing of slaves by the slave states was preferable (along with colonization to another location). Lincoln was fearful of the racial consequences of suddenly freeing slaves–as the next hundred years or so of Jim Crow demonstrates. By 1862 the abolishionist view prevailed, and Lincoln’s writing reflects this–if you so choose to see. You should contrast these views with Northern Democrats (Copperheads) and Southern Democrats.

            Keep in mind the Civil War was fought to end slavery, preserve the Union, and not necessarily to end racism. Racism (not the word, but the belief) is a human trait, not invented by Europeans, but practiced by many cultures and roooted in the view that their cultural beliefs and customs are preferable, superior, to others.
            Respectfully

          • AJCoog

            “Letter to Horace Greeley,” 22 August 1862. You have summed up nicely why Lincoln was considered anti-slavery, not an abolitionist. Thanks. :)

        • Joe The Gentile

          It’s not insanity. It is just one-sided as your own point is.

        • MilHisTom

          True, the South wanted to preserve slavery–for obivious established political, economic, and social reasons. However, the American Civil War was fought by the Northern States (which gave power to the Federal Government) to both preserve the Union and end slavery. If you doubt that pick up and read any well written history of the period–start with Lincoln’s writings (you will see the evolution of his thoughts on the matter). The American Abolishionist Movement was quite adamant about its stance to end slavery as well. The South reacted to Lincoln’s election in 1860 in part for fear he was an abolishionist at heart. You only need to be more inclusive with your reading of history. What is “insane” is your inability to acknowledge facts as they are.

          • AJCoog

            Lincoln was anti-slavery, not abolitionist. Big difference. One way to tell: why was the Emancipation Proclamation written sans all the otherwise Lincolnean floridness? It is, of all his works the most profound and yet the least eloquent — an odd paradox for a man never at a loss for eloquence, eh? There are several historical answers to that questions, few of which are correct. We discussed this at length in Dr. Steven Deyle’s Civil War class. You can Google Dr. Deyle. He’s quite the scholar on American slavery. I’m glad I took both his advanced level courses. :) The way to begin getting at the answer is to ask: What was his political aim by issuing the Proclamation? What impact would it have regionally and nationally? The answer is usually overlooked, clouded by a bias that wants very badly to cast him in with abolitionists who were not at all what anti-slavery folks were about.. One was a moral position, one was a geographical one. Which was which?

        • Ruvane

          why don’t your lead a movement back to Africa thats what Lincoln wanted better for y’all to go there

        • Roywil

          True. But it was not an either/or situation. The nation could not be preserved in unity as long as the slavery issue tore it apart.

        • Sussex Girl

          Steve, Steve. What is known is that the first slave owner in America, Anthony Johnson, was a black man with an indentured servant; he went to court to be able to keep him permanently. What is known is that the largest slave owner in South Carolina in 1860 was a black man, William Ellison, who was a freed slave himself. What is known is that 28% of slave owners in New Orleans were black, according to the 1860 census. What is known is that free black slave owners fought for the Confederacy, and they were fighting against abolitionism.

          White and BLACK slave owners fought for the Confederacy. 388,000 black slaves were sold in the US. Some estimates are that between 1 and 2 million white slaves were sold here. So what is your problem?

          • Steve Fair

            OUTRIGHT LIES.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt!

          • dennis x

            It was called charitable slavery , wherein freed Blacks would buy their relatives and friends.

      • rhondajo3

        The main issue involved in the Civil War was not slavery but states rights over federal rights. Things we are still fighting about today.

        • pneville

          You need to read what the Southern states declared in their justifications for secession. In Mississippi the articles were 90% about the protection of slavery..

      • Gee

        That is a myth. Most of the Union soldiers were opposed to ending slavery.
        There were several reasons for the American Civil War. The most important was a term know as Regionalism. Where one’s was more important than the United States. People were Virginians, or Hoosiers before being Americans.
        Most of the documents written by the federal government addressed “THESE United States” after the war it was uniform “THE United States”

        • tomads

          I think ewe drink too much Democrat (Party of Slavery!) revisionist koolaid…
          UNCLE TOM caused those white folk to free the slaves…
          John Brown proved that even armed they could not free themselves…
          The Republican Party was born to free slaves!
          Which it did in ten years!

          • Seek

            By reducing this to a matter of political party, you cheapen the issue and render it absurd. The issue is blacks and their white enablers.

          • Steve Fair

            Blacks and their white enablers???? Straight from the Kl@n handbook.

          • Drakken

            BOO! There is a white guy behind you, go run to mommy.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            White enablers keep blacks from maturing, and keep them dependent on the federal government for the endless ‘gibs-me-dat’. This is how modern liberalism enslaves blacks without the use of physical chains. The vast majority of blacks are stupid enough to fall for it too.

          • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

            What happens when those checks stop coming ?
            any ideas?

          • Drakken

            The Serb Option.

          • tomads

            what’s the serb option?

            mass murder and genocide?

          • Drakken

            Warfare.

          • tomads

            who against whom?

          • tomads

            They get jobs, marry the mothersof their children and produce the fine blacks we used to have in the north before the Dhimmicrats took them over…

          • Jimmy D

            Dear BuffyCreep…what kind of blinders are YOU wearing that you haven’t seen the vast majority of stupid whites?Hmmmmm? Half the world and half of white America has fallen for the class war gambit at one time or other and half of all conservatives fall somewhere in the “Liberal who got mugged” category. We don’t need to figure out why blacks are stupid. We “all fall short of the glory…” The rest of what you say is spot on.

          • healthydude

            Yep, we all fall short of God’s glory. You got that right. But none of that erases the utter savagery and dysfunctional nature of blacks worldwide. To simply assert ‘We’re all bad’ does little to pinpoint the very real differences between blacks and whites.

            If we weren’t constantly being sold the idea that blacks are so wonderful and just as creative and intelligent as whites, there wouldn’t be a need to refute such lies. But when such Leftist lies continue – along with skyrocketing levels of black crime and brutality – it’s necessary to refute such false ideas.

          • Jimmy D

            Dear Unhealthy Lewd,
            There are so many black people that are your moral emotional intellectual sexual and spiritual superiors. Who would know where to begin? And that’s not really saying much about blacks. Because you are a drooling dwarf brained idiot. Brute degeneracy occurs every time in every race culture country gang clan clique family or individual idiot Dude that ceases to be awed and humbled by the brilliance of God, the incomprehensible genius of His creation (all of it, all its people, every color) the mortal fear of the holiness of His judgments, and a profound gratitude for His endless mercies. Rely on the Living Christ, Dude. Stop blaming blacks for the devastations consciously wrought upon them by the very same godless leftists who parade as their saviors.

          • Drakken

            You haven’t been to Africa have you? Our inner cities look exactly like it except they wear better sneakers.

          • Jimmy D

            You haven’t seen the poor of the world at all. The wretched and oppressed are found all over the world. They are Caucasian, Oriental, Asian Indian, Native American, Russian, European, Arabic. Some are African. A hundred years ago blacks and whites grew up in families. There was no welfare and everyone stood on their own. Criminality was not a fraction of what it is today even in the cites, and there, organized criminal gangs were mainly a white thing.
            The prison population as a percentage was a tenth of what it is today. Communism seeks to undermine and destroy the poorest, then organize them against wealthy.
            That’s how they’ve taken control every single time. Here the poorest were the blacks so they were targeted and have been crushed. Every negative in their culture has been financed to the moon by vicious racist white “Liberals”, pretending to be “down with the people” or some such BS. Every corrupt Fire Breathing Black Radical has been financed to vilify and destroy any decent (i.e., conservative) black leadership.
            You, in your stinking racist ignorance, are aiding and abetting the very ones who will enslave you and see to it that your children or grand children will be the ones with “better sneakers”.

          • tomads

            Do you really deny that the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and the KKK and Jim Crow and the never-ending filibuster against Republican sponsored civil rights acts?

            what’s a white enabler, comrade Goebbels?

            racism is a word invented by Trotsky, that atheist, whom Stalin snuffed in mexico…

          • Jimmy D

            Scrolling down I notice that Steve Fair has been seemingly well answered by a dozen people and then apparently all of his comments have been deleted. So the “referee’ of this comment section takes a debate between Stupid Rude and Vile and a number of more sensible, genteel commenters, and renders the better thought into gibberish by deleting all the objects of their objections. DUDE. Why don’t you go get a job ruining the NFL and let the adults here talk among themselves.

          • tomads

            That’s funny!
            How did ewe fantacize that out of the article above?

        • Sussex Girl

          “Most of the Union soldiers were opposed to ending slavery.”

          Sources, please.

        • American Patriot

          That I have to disagree with you. No offense, but what you posted regarding Union soldiers and slavery is nothing but Communist propaganda designed to smear American abolitionists and other anti-slavery activists in 19th century society in order to falsely portray America as an irredeemable racist society. A large portion of the Union Army were actually abolitionists who wanted the end of slavery and fought in the Civil War to end that institution. Lerone Bennett, Jr. is a Marxist who writes revisionist history in order to advance his Marxist agenda. He is almost like the black version of the late Communist historian Howard Zinn.

          • tagalog

            According to the PBS series The Civil War: The Untold Story (a highly pro-black propaganda series that tells little that hasn’t been told), about 350,000 white Union soldiers and about 150,000 black Union soldiers were casualties (dead, wounded, missing) in the Civil War.

            So whites put their lives on the line in about a 2.3:1 ratio in the Civil War in order to free the slaves.

        • Santa Baby

          They did not want more Africans?

    • Steve Fair

      So why are you talking about it now? In fact the only people I hear nowadays constantly making references to slavery are rightwingers.

      • UCSPanther

        I had a Great-Great Grandmother who was an indentured servant back in England.

        Does that mean that I am entitled to reparations? I guess not, because she was white, and I am white.

        • Steve Fair

          A few problems with your rant. First, this is America, not England. Second, an indentured servant was not a chattel slave. Three, who mentioned anything about reparations?

          • UCSPanther

            You constantly keep bringing reparations up.

            Last time I checked, England was involved in the Slave trade, and indentured servitude IS a form of slavery no matter what way you spin it.

          • Steve Fair

            I have NEVER mentioned reparations you pathetic liar. Reparations is an issue constantly referenced by the right to excite their minions that blacks are trying to take something from them.

          • UCSPanther

            Coming in here and insulting, spreading false accusations, threatening and acting terminally offended is not going to do you any favors.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Berserker

            Negroes have been reparated in spades: welfare, section 8, affirmative action, food stamps, blaming Whites for their failures, not being held accountable for feral behavior.

            Move to Haiti and embrace the culture your species has created.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            But you can’t call it “reparations.” You have to call it (open ended) “social justice.” That way it can be nurtured forever. Or until global communism is achieved. Then they’ll find out what communists really think of other races.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            I agree. Since blacks are so unhappy with the white man and his ‘disenfranchising’ system, I recommend they all move post-haste to Haiti, the Congo, South Africa and Nigeria. Oh, those Bantus are going to be happy to see their long lost descendants! No, really. Don’t forget to send a postcard!

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Of course deception requires other angles of attack because reparations doesn’t get the right response. And because reparations would actually call for a final settlement. Your masters don’t want a final settlement that leaves free market capitalism and our constitution standing.

          • Wolfthatknowsall

            Most of the “benefits” received in certain minority communities are reparations. They just don’t call them “reparations”.

          • AJCoog

            Indentured servants were not considered property. Big difference. You worked off an indenture much like an apprenticeship in a set number of years. The word means a type of contract. You paid for a slave; you contracted with an indenture. The terms could be steep, but they were typically honored.

          • Ruvane

            why don’t you spend more time taking care of millions of young afro boys that need a big brother because that would be more beneficial you are to lazy though easier to be mean and hateful

      • glpage

        You haven’t been listening to Holder and Obama have you? Or Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, the Congressional Black Caucus, the MSM, academics, SPLC, NAACP, and a whole host of left leaning organizations.

        • Steve Fair

          Provide a quote from Holder or Obama calling for reparations. Even Jesse Jackson for that matter.

          • glpage

            You said “constantly making references to slavery”. You did not say anything about reparations. My response was relative to what you said, not what you may have been thinking.

          • tagalog

            Jesse Jackson is a member of the National Coalition of Blacks to Study Reparations in America. So is Louis Farrakhan.

            Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. is a sponsor of the Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act.

          • Steve Fair

            This is pathetic.

          • tagalog

            Well, that’s one way to stop debate. ‘Bye.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            They want “social justice” which is reparations under another theory.

            Social justice is never ending reparations using bullshit arguments. Reparations, using that terminology, would actually lead to an end of claims. They don’t ever want to have that. Ever. But they do ask for open-ended reparations every time they open their mouths about “social justice.”

      • tagalog

        That is certainly a facile view, given the nature of such discussion as there has been on race over the past 30 years or so. “Four hundred years of slavery,” in addition to being an outright fabrication, has become a cliché.

        Black slavery is a recurring background theme (and often it’s right up front) whenever lefties begin making excuses for some atrocity-committing person who happens to be black. “Oh, we must understand, he’s only acting out the centuries of slavery and oppression that his people have suffered in America.”

        • Steve Fair

          Discussion by whom? Let’s see a quote.

          • tagalog

            John Conyers, Louis Gates, both have said plenty about reparations. And David Horowitz, among others, has written lots in reply.

            One well-known black argument over the decades has been that “black slaves built this country; now it’s time to pay them back.” Don’t say it hasn’t, everyone knows it has. Except the people who might claim to have done that have been dead for about a century; it doesn’t stop their descendants for a moment.

          • Steve Fair

            Quote please.

          • tagalog

            John Conyers: http://conyers.house.gov/index.cfm/reparations

            Henry Louis Gates: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/opinion/23gates.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

            Are those OK, or do you want more?

            In the “actions speak louder than words” category, Senator Barack Obama supported the farmer plaintiff seeking what amounted to reparations in Pigford v. Glickman, although he is on record as saying he is not in favor of direct reparations. Evidently, instead of supporting direct monetary payments to black Americans, he supports characterizing non-payment of reparations as white racism.

            Eric Holder also supported President Obama’s position vis-a-vis Pigford v. Glickman.

            See, also, for more leftie puffery of reparations: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/darron-t-smith-phd/a-new-case-for-african-am_b_4345768.html

            Al Sharpton on reparations: “When asked whether he supported lawsuits against corporations that are accused of having profited from slavery 150 years ago, Sharpton told CNSNews.com, ‘Absolutely. I think that corporations and insurance companies, just like those corporations that were engaged in things with the Nazis in Germany … should pay when they unfairly benefited from the sufferings of people… “He predicted that the biggest opponents of corporate slave reparations will be “those that have to pay…” During his speech, which was sponsored by the Georgetown University NAACP chapter, Sharpton told the audience that America has not ‘solved the problem of race.’ He chastised those who argue that race relations are ‘not as bad as they used to be.’”

          • Steve Fair

            Oh so white farmers get loans from the government it is “good government” but when blacks who were denied the same loans are recompensed it’s “reparations.”? I get you now racist.

          • tagalog

            I KNEW you’d focus in on that case as your sole argument for your position.

            I’ve given the quotes you kept asking for, now you want to argue the quotes. Like I said, ‘bye. There’s no debating with such folks.

          • Steve Fair

            You claim there is a community wide clamoring for reparations amongst blacks yet come up with Conyers and Gates? This is sad. Yeah, you better haul azz.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Steve Fair tagalog • 8 hours ago: “You claim there is a community wide clamoring for reparations amongst blacks yet come up with Conyers and Gates? This is sad. Yeah, you better hail azz.”
            “Social justice” is about open ended reparations. It’s the same thing except that “social justice” depends on neo-Marxist arguments whereas reparations conversations usually tend to focus on agreements that would theoretically end the claims from a legal perspective.

          • Seek

            That case, Pigford v. USDA, was a hustle and shakedown. There was NO evidence of loan or grant discrimination. The Agriculture Department simply knuckled under to its accusers rather than be called “racist” by knuckleheads like you.

          • Steve Fair
          • objectivefactsmatter

            “A disproportionate number of Black farmers lost their farms during the past 90 years. Their advocates say that if the USDA had provided loans and other assistance to every farmer equally, the country’s landscape would look very different.”

            That’s evidence. Sort of.

          • Joe The Gentile

            That is NOT evidence of any strength. Unequal outcomes is no proof of discrimination. No more than fewer blacks graduating, or more blacks defaulting on their mortgages is evidence of discrimination.

          • American Patriot

            Really? You are using Workers World as your main source? Workers World is one of the worst, if not, the worst radical left-wing parties in the United States today. They are anti-American, anti-democracy, anti-human rights, pro-Stalinist/Maoist, pro-Communist totalitarian, pro-Baathist and pro-Islamist to the core. Workers World supported (and continues to support) Communist regimes in different parts of the world, including the homicidal, racist Kim family dynasty in North Korea. Workers World has also supported past and present Communist atrocities, including the Tiananmen Square massacre in China and the shoot down of two unarmed humanitarian planes belonging to the Cuban American human rights group, Brothers to the Rescue, over international waters in the Florida Straits, resulting in four deaths. Workers World does the exact opposite of what a good patriot should do.

          • Drakken

            Yup, just like clockwork, the race card being thrown, your sooooo predictable. Yes we crackers get it, we are all racists because we are white, how original.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Details matter.

            If you get something over and above equality before the law, the deal might have been sealed under some theory of “social justice” or open-ended reparations.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Blacks were the manual labor for building some things within the U.S., but the creative mind and pre-planning were all white men. This popular racial polemic by whites is equivalent to a cattle or donkey claiming it created the goods that are on the wagon simply because it had to carry it down a dirt road.

          • tagalog

            To be completely frank, I would be OK with deciding on a one-time lump-sum payment of money to black people to pay them off for slavery. Call it whatever it is, “reparations,” “ransom,” “payoff,” whatever it actually is. But I would insist on one condition: from the date of payment onward, there must be no beefing about black suffering due to slavery, not one word of complaint any more. If there’s current oppression, OK to complain about what’s going on now, but not a murmer about slavery and its effects. They get paid and they shut up forever.

          • healthydude

            I hear you tag, but I’d rather just give them one lump sum if they’d just leave the U.S. for Haiti or South Africa. No matter how much we pay them, they’ll never shut up about slavery and always try to make the white man to somehow pay.

          • dennis x

            Who designed the capital and its general area?

          • Roywil

            Good lord, man, do your own Googling. It’s not that hard.

          • Steve Fair

            “Go Google” is a diversion by liars. You know that.

          • Roywil

            I didn’t know that. Still don’t.

          • 95Theses

            Typical Steve-o tactic. Make outrageous and unsubstantiated claims, then insist that you prove him wrong by doing his work for him. Steve-o is a coward, a bombastic name-caller, a hypocrite, a phony, a liar, and a racist — all rolled into one big unlovable hairball.

            Scroll past the troll.

          • Joe The Gentile

            95Theses, I don’t get it why so many intelligent commenters on frontpagemag fall for troll bait and turn the page into trollfeed.

          • tagalog

            I actually did his work for him. Then he wanted to argue with me over what the people I quoted said. That’s when I gave up on him.

          • 95Theses

            Too funny … and yet, as trolls go, he did wreak a lot of havoc, did he not? I think that when it became clear to
            me what it was that he was up to that I began mocking him. And what I did not expect was that when I began using the mocking strategy, he started ignoring me!

            I believe that there is a takeaway from that experience, for me at any rate. I just didn’t realize that ridiculing him would be so effective.

            I am so glad that he has been banned. Though I do wish that it had come sooner. Oh well … live and learn.

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Even if you got a quote, you’d deny it or explain it out of existence. May I suggest you also stop trying to get others to collect such research information? Geez, does whitey have to do everything for you?

      • johnnie the jew

        Slavery knows no colour boundaries so I don’t know what this rant is all about. Irish slaves were cheaper than black slaves a few hundred years ago in the US and parts of the Caribbean but no one is making films about them. And loads more whites throughout history.Think Barbary coast for example. So, in short, all this juvenile and petulant BS about how we all still should be apologising to one another, especially whites to the blacks is tedious time wasting. Fair play to Jack Kerwick.He’s done a good job of throwing some well needed perspective and spotlight on this hackneyed, over played black on white thing, vis a vis slavery.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        Steve Fair UCSPanther • 10 hours ago: “So why are you talking about it now? In fact the only people I hear nowadays constantly making references to slavery are rightwingers.”
        Oh please.

      • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

        Nonsense! Many blacks bring up slavery all the time. It’s always, in various forms, thrown in the face of whites. Blacks love to keep up the slavery narrative because it keeps the government goodies constantly coming. The gravy train will soon end though.

    • Joe The Gentile

      Jim Crow laws were not universal either. The former confederate states all had them, but coverage was patchy, to use a modern term, in the rest of the US.

      • Steve Fair

        There was de facto Jim Crow all through America until the 1960s. I suggest you read about the “Levittowns”. Suburban tract housing constructed after WW2 in the Northeast United States and available only to white returning GI’s for no or little money down.

        • Ruvane

          of course there was terrible discrimination red lining districts so afros couldn’t get a mortgage we know that but you would rather be miserable and hate it is easier to behave like that than move on and have a good attitude a generation of afro men wasted their lives being so serious about slavery etc etc taking muslims names you are stupid and a sad man

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Those whites who did everything in their power to prevent blacks from moving into their neighborhoods did so because they KNEW what blacks would do to their communities. And guess what? They were absolutely right as every American city can now testify to. Blacks, by and large, have devastated our once grand cities and turned them into ghetto toilet bowls.

            Blacks were granted the same civil rights as whites, but all it really did was give them a freedom and privileges they could never appreciate nor value. And isn’t that exactly what the past 50 years has proven? Like little children, they were given a host of freedoms that they could never manage or use prudently. What a waste! We are now paying for that horrible mistake.

          • Truth Teller

            Detroit! Operated by black Democrats for half a century. Look at it now! America? With a third world Kenyan who never worked for anything (was GIVEN everything -including Ivy League diplomas, and look what he does! He spends money like a lame brained or drunken sailor! He is a racist, he is full of hate and every word out of his mouth is a lie. He did not teach constitutional law! He did not have a law license (must undergo a character investigation and his Kenyan birth was a no-go, but Chicago (home of Communism in America and always a decadent, decrepit and lawless group) GAVE him a decent job, GAVE him everything – with nothing but the APPEARANCE his drugged, homosexual bath housed mentality was full of nothing but hatred for America. His aim was to DESTROY AMERICA – in true Satanic fashion he smiles at you while stabbing you in the back. Give a black an inch and they will take a mile! Affirmative Actions is a racist law! It says, “because we know you are less capable, mentally we will lower the standards so you can pass them, we will GIVE you special privileges so you can appear to be as good as white people. We will GIVE you everything because we do not believe you are capable of competing fairly.” See what the RACIST AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONS LAW, the welfare laws, the food stamp laws, the free this, free that has done? The blacks are just slaves to the KKK Democrats – yes, Democrats are the party of the KKK – go look it up! Of course they lie to you. It keeps you voting for still more ‘freebies’ (enslavement) and it is the same with the sodomites. Regardless of what law (just ink on paper – lying words by rich judges who want to own you) is made, it does NOT change the FACTS! BLACKS ARE RACIST! Islam is not a religion it is a political ideology based on deception and enslavement! There is no such thing as ‘modern’ Muslims – there is only Muslims and they are brainwashed with a RACIST, RAPIST mentality that is UNCIVILIZED! The KORAN and Mohammad are insane! Mohammad was a pedophile – ‘married’ a six year old and raped her when she was nine years old! Muslims still do that today! And these dreadful dungheads (Obama is one) want to destroy America! I’m not racist, I tell the truth, just like the guy on the video – truth may hurt, but it’s the only thing that can cure. Islam is racism. Muslims are racists! They are destroying America and that’s just what they intend to do…cut your throat! And they don’t care if your skin is black or white! Islam is a poison . Don’t listen to the insanity from Washington, D.C. They want a race war between blacks and whites! Don’t fall for their trash. There is no such thing as a homophobe, islamaphobe and other phobes the Communist/Democrat/KKK want to destroy you with! Know the truth – only the truth will set you free. Jesus Christ is the truth! Only He and he alone can set you free!

        • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

          Jim Crow laws were enacted because whites wanted to protect themselves from the volatile and violent nature of blacks. Whites had a long history of dealing with blacks, and they knew what these people were like inherently. They also knew how impulsive, easily angered, and dim-witted the vast majority of them were.

          Whether for good or bad, Jim Crow laws were intended to prevent the sort of dysfunction and savagery that we witness everyday by blacks within every major American city. Maybe those old white folks were not so backwards as we had once thought?

          • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

            As long as I’m not forced to live with them, I could care less what them people do ..
            One thing for certain . . .and this sounds racist but, NEVER trust a darkie

          • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

            Let’s put it this way: MLK wanted blacks to be judged by the ‘content of their character.’ Well, whites have! And that explains why we generally don’t trust them. It has nothing to do with their skin color and everything to do with their character – namely, their criminal and savage proclivities.

          • dennis x

            Thank you , same way we feel about whites, never trust a cracker!!!!!!!

          • American Patriot

            Was Emmet Till dangerous? Was James Byrd, Jr. dangerous? Was Medgar Evers dangerous? Let me answer those questions for you: no, no and no! Those men were law-abiding citizens who were brutally by racists simply because they were black. I agree that the left blows things out of proportion today, but in the past, innocent blacks were victims of hate crimes in which white racists were unpunished. Do you condemn those atrocities committed against the three men above?

          • AJCoog

            Unfortunately, your ethnocentric view does not account for the fact that by 1860s, one fifth of the southern population was enslaved yet there was never a great uprising or great slave revolt which slave-holding southerners often feared. How do you account for this passivity, which has mystified scholars as well? With every reason to revolt and free themselves of bondage, slaves themselves rarely did. Why?

    • Joe The Gentile

      Check out Stefan Molyneux’s ‘The Truth About Slavery’ here:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31E1gHowYcA

      Lots of interesting facts, such as more Irish sold to slavery overall, and more white Europeans captured to slavery by Muslims, than blacks **brought to North America** for slavery.

    • Dr. Heidi Bach

      unfortunately predators prey upon the weal-minded or weak-spirited who find their identity in finding grievance anywhere they can…and find it most easily in GROUPS through GrievanceCapitalists, eg jesse jackson, al sharpton, and that wanna-be “minister” in FL

    • tagalog

      The United States ceased participation in the international slave trade in 1808, by the express terms of the United States Constitution. After 1808, the population of slaves in America increased only by birth among those slaves who were already here. The increase during that period was from less than a million slaves to about 5,000,000 by 1860. Things couldn’t have been ALL bad here for the slaves if they increased their population by 500% in 52 years. I’m not arguing in favor of slavery by saying that; I’m saying that I am skeptical of the claim that there was some sort of “Black Holocaust” going on in the United States in that time.

    • InformedConservative

      I hate the idea of reparations, but not for the reasons you mentioned. We need to be honest with ourselves about our own history, black and white alike. I am older than an America where everyone could vote or order a milkshake. There’s no need for reparations, but not because we didn’t do some stupid stuff in our history. We did. A black guy my age south of the Mason Dixon has definitely been directly affected by Jim Crow. I’ve seen it. But a black guy half my age in Detroit now, doesn’t need a check because of it.

  • American1969

    So I guess that blows the entire “white people came over and kidnapped us and made us slaves” narrative, doesn’t it? And I guess it blows the “white people have never been slaves” narrative, as well. Isn’t it interesting how different history is when you get accurate facts instead of the revisionist BS?

    • sundance69

      Unfortunately this is exactly what is being taught in our government schools today.

      • American1969

        That’s been taught for years! I remember being taught this kind of stuff in school myself. It wasn’t until later that I learned that a lot of history that most of us have been taught is revisionist and inaccurate.

        • MrUniteUs1

          What school? When? Are you making this up?

          • American1969

            No, I’m not making that up! That is what has been taught in schools for years in California.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Never heard that narrative, except on right wing Jewish websites.

      • Steve Fair

        Exactly.

    • tomads

      “that blows the entire “white people came over and kidnapped us and made us slaves” narrative, doesn’t it?”

      Malaria kept the white folk on the boats…

      Almost every black here had ancestors sold into slavery by other blacks…

      There were blacks, mostly slaveholders, who fought for the Rebs…

      25% of the blacks who fought in that war fought for the south…

      The Party of SLAVERY is the DEMOCRAT Party,

      which invented Jim Crow, and

      created the KKK as its militia to enforce Jim Crow, and

      impeded the efforts of the REPUBLICAN PARTY,

      which was BORN TO FREE SLAVES!

      which it accomplished within ten years,

      to integrate persons of color into the American mainstream.

      The Party of Slavery (D) also forbade education for slaves…

      I suggest you ignore that prohibition…

      • American1969

        Ssshhh! Stop that with the facts! The leftists’ heads will explode! It messes with the narrative!

        • dragonfly310

          Nah. The lib will just correct you again and remind you of the Democrat exodus after the civil rights laws were passed in the 60s. The racist Democrats then flocked to the Republican party, which is where they remain to this day. Nice little ideological shift Republicans/conservatives/tea-partiers conveniently forget.

          • American1969

            You leftists always try to use that, but it won’t work. Obviously, those persons that shifted did so because the South was changing, and they wanted to save their political careers.
            HISTORY shows that it was Republicans that were against slavery, Jim Crow laws, the KKK, etc., not the Democrats!
            By the way, Robert Byrd—Democrat—was a high-ranking member of the KKK. Make sure to rake him over the coals for his behavior. And don’t forget LBJ, who said he’d have the !@#$%^s voting Democrat forever once he passed his Great Society fallacy, which made people even more poor.
            Revisionist history will not help you.

          • tomads

            What’s racist about the Republican Party?
            We freed the slaves while Democrats were in fact the party of Slavery, Jim Crow and the KKK!
            Teddy drank with the KKK, eh?
            There appears to be little dummy-crats can post without lies and fantasies…

  • MrUniteUs1

    I have to give the writer a big incomplete. He failed to mention that Romans enslaved Greeks and Slavs for centuries. He failed to mention that the British enslaved the Irish, and event sent some to work on plantations. While he repeated the phrase African Muslims, he failed to mention Arabs Muslims.
    No mention of Jews involved in the slave trade then and now..

    • Davros11

      You are right, he should have also mentioned all the black slavery still being committed by blacks in Africa, and also that many black arabs still have slaves to this day in Africa!

    • http://www.chaverimisrael.org Norbert Haag

      If it wasn’t for you we would have forgotten that the Jews are responsible for slavery too, like for controlling the media, banking business and the NWO.

      Thank you dear Jew hater for showing how dumb you are.

      You made us aware of the fact that the Jewish conspiracy sells millions of slaves every year and that Boko Haran is a jewish organisation in disguise.

      • Ruvane

        you cannot reason with a black supremacist

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Despite the ravings of the Nation of Islam, Jews were not significantly involved in the African slave trade.

      Jews are not involved in the slave trade now, except in the minds of Jew-hating trolls. Muslims are, though, in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and elsewhere.

      Jews were, however, enslaved by the Romans and others. And when they were sovereign in their own land before the exiles of 586 BCE and 70 CE, they held slaves, like every other society at that time.

      We forget that before the industrial revolution, and especially before the European enlightment, slave-based economies were the norm, not the exception.
      Troll!
      Flag!

      • Steve Fair
        • Ruvane

          they were also very helpful to Afros in the 60s they helped supply loans etc were board members of the NAACO I lived in Atlanta at that time you sound like a real stupid jerk

          • Steve Fair

            Some were, many weren’t. For every Mickey Schwerner, there was a Norman Podhoretz. For every Stanley Levinson, there was a Meir Kahane.

          • Ruvane

            i feel sorry for you do you condemn farrakan wright why are you not marching on the white house with unemployment around 20 percent for your ignorant slothful people

          • Steve Fair

            What do I need to condemn Rev. Wright for? He’s a decorated Marine Corp veteran and a fine man. As for the rest of your racist filth, get bent.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Yeah, all fine men preach about how the racist Jews are running the country.

          • Steve Fair

            Wright is anti-semite? Let’s see a quote.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Do your own research.

          • Steve Fair

            Busted again. Liar.

          • American Patriot

            You admire the black racist and anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan. You also admire sellouts like Tim Wise.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            And I’ll say the same to you about your slur of Norman Podhoretz hating blacks.

          • Ruvane

            you are full of hate because of a really sad childhood

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            His adulthood seems pretty sad, too.

          • objectivefactsmatter
          • Ruvane

            you are getting defensive now did I hit a nerve? do you have two parents?

          • Steve Fair

            Listen dummy, your taunts and stalking only confirm your ignorance.

          • Drakken

            Oh look, a fine display of your impulse control, none.

          • tagalog

            Reverend Wright, as a Navy corpsman, was on the team that provided care to President Lyndon Johnson during his hospitalization in 1966. Every member of that team received a letter from the admiral who commanded their detachment on behalf of the President, thanking them for their work.

            A letter of commendation for care provided to the President is nothing to sneeze at, but it hardly rises to the level of a “decoration.” Now if Wright’s unit received a Presidential Distinguished Unit Citation, that would be a decoration.

            I don’t know what kind of man Wright is in private. In public, he’s a “God damn America” man. That condemns him in my book. Evidently not in yours.

          • ennis

            So was Lee Harvey Oswalt.

          • Ruvane

            so the jews were 50 50 you say?

          • Steve Fair

            50 50 what?

          • Ruvane

            pro negro anti negro 50 50? someday you might need a jewish doctor and he should let you suffer because you are a miscreant

          • Steve Fair

            Sorry racist but my entire support system of professionals are black. My primary physician, dentist, pediatrician, attorney and accountant.

          • Ruvane

            thats to bad the afros have really declined ignorant people orphans millions of kids no fathers low education levels high crime but boy you are really on your high horse real proud of being an asshole

          • Drakken

            And who is the racist now? You are a hoot to say the least!

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Steve Fair -> Ruvane • 7 hours ago: “Sorry racist but my entire support system of professionals are black. My primary physician, dentist, pediatrician, attorney and accountant.”

            Wow. You really are a racist.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Reply to Steppin’ Fair:

            “Sorry racist but my entire support system of professionals are aryan. My primary physician, dentist, pediatrician, attorney and accountant.”

            See how you sound?

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Liar.
            There were a lot more Schwerners, Heschels and Foxmans.
            And Podhoretz (as and far as I know, Kahane) advocated equal legal rights for blacks.

          • Steve Fair

            Podhoretz is an out and out racist who has admitted that he hated blacks. Kahane advocated violence against blacks and Muslims. Sorry if the truth offends you.

          • American Patriot

            You mean like the way black racists like Stokely Carmichael and H. Rap Brown admiited that they hate whites, Christians, Jews and self-hating “Uncle Tom” blacks who support this country and /or don’t share their hate-filled views. There are many racists like Carmichael and Brown (like members of the Nation of Islam, the New Black Panther Party and other likeminded hate groups) who share their views and support their agendas.

          • Steve Fair

            Carmichael is dead. H. Rap has become an obscure Islamic cleric. You obsess with these black bogeyman in a pathetic attempt to rationalize your hatred and resentment of black people in general.

          • American Patriot

            You obsess with a small number of Jewish militants in a pathetic attempt to rationalize your hatred and resentment of whites, Christians and Jews in general.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Podhoretz – show me.
            Kahane – I am not going to defend his position on Muslims and Arabs. As far as I know, he never advocated violence against blacks except in self-defense.

          • Steve Fair
          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Yeah, I read My Negro Problem and Ours at 50, and also My Negro Problem-and Ours. Nowhere in “My Negro Problem-and Ours” at 50 does Podhoretz say that he hates or hated black people.
            Podhoretz’s friend James Baldwin who knows a thing or two about racism, read the manuscript for My Negro Problem-and Ours, and did not find it racist. In fact, Baldwain thought it was brilliant and urged Podhoretz to publish it.

            Have you actually read the article you linked to? He talks about how the first article came to be written, and how so many people have stupidly (my words, not his) misunderstood the first article as saying that all whites hate blacks, or that Podhoretz does or did. In my opinion, only a fool or someone reading with deliberate ill will (subset of fool) could reach either conclusion.

            By the way, did you miss the part in his first article where he laments the state of race relations in the US, points out how both races had contributed to the problem, and urged interracial marriage as the best solution? Yeah, that’s admitting he hates black people

            You will doubtless pull a few quotes from the articles out of context, and I will laugh at how predictable and dumb of a liar you are.

          • Steve Fair

            You’re absolutely nuts. He clearly stated that he hated blacks, that blacks were almost “totally” dependent on government largesse, and the only way to eliminate racism was to eliminate the black race through race mixing.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            I have no reason to think you are truthful, but if you truly believe that’s what his articles say, you are either dumber than I thought, more emotionally or mentally disturbed than I realized, or both.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            So, diversity among the Jews? How can that be?

        • ahad_ha_amoratsim

          You’re not bursting anything. Faber’s book quotes charges by cranks like the Jew-hating Nation of Islam and crackpot Henry Gates, then finds a few isolated cases of Jews financing slave traders in England. See the review at http://www.academicroom.com/bookreview/jews-slaves-and-slave-trade-setting-record-straight pointing out how small was the involvement that Faber was able to show. “Deeply involved”? Give me a break.

          • Steve Fair

            LMAO!!!!! Ahad…you are very excitable. So let me ask you something. Do you believe there were more black slave owners than Jews involved in the slave trade? Or Jewish slumlords in the urban ghettoes?

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Excitable? No, I just donj’t believe in dignifying absurd lies.
            And yes, there were a lot more black Africans selling slaves than there were Jews involved in the slave trade.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Thanks for sharing.
          Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record
          Straight (Reppraisals in Jewish Social and Intellectual History)

          Paperback

          by

          Eli Faber

          (Author)
          Right wing Jews seem to feel good when talking about others involved in the slave trade. But are in denial about Jewish involvement in the slave trade.

          • Steve Fair

            Or if you even acknowledge that FACT then you are an anti-semite.

          • American Patriot

            Or if you oppose senseless reparations then you are a racist, isn’t that right, uptownmoron?

          • Steve Fair

            Who is actively promoting reparations today? This is a strawman.

          • American Patriot

            Radical left-wing blacks who hate American society and/or were members of/sympathized with your beloved Black Panther Party.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Rev. Wright in a nutshell.

          • liz

            Hate Jews much? It’s showing just a little.

    • American1969

      Anti-Semite.

    • Steve Fair

      Mr UU, the mission with this garbage piece was not truth but to minimize the brutality and evil of the European slave trade and to assuage the guilt of the white racist. An FPM specialty.

      • UCSPanther

        Why should I feel guilty about something that was ended over 150 years ago?

        • Steve Fair

          Do you admit to being a racist?

          • UCSPanther

            Answer my question, pal.

            Why should I be held responsible for something that has been ended over 150 years ago?

            By your logic, my Anglo-Saxon ancestors were victimized by my Norman ancestors in the Norman conquest of England. Therefore, I should sue myself for reparations.

          • Steve Fair

            Who is holding you responsible? During the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade your ancestors were probably holed up in some European cave trying to figure out how to grow a potato.

          • UCSPanther

            So accusing me of being underevolved now?

            Who’s the racist now?

          • Drakken

            We are culturalist, we celebrate and embrace western civilization and all that it has brought to the world, namely everything you enjoy today in the 21st Century, your welcome your effing ingrate.

      • glpage

        So, pointing out that slavery in this country was not completely like the current narrative makes this a garbage piece. Sorry, epic fail. Slavery has been a brutal occurrence all over the world perpetuated by people of all races. What happened in this country for 200 years was no worse that what had been happening throughout history all over the world and, in some areas, witness the activities of Boko Haram, continues to this day. Just because American slavery was no worse than Arab or Roman or Greek or whatever form it took does not imply it was not evil, just that it was an evil like so many others. The fact that blacks sold other blacks into slavery should not be glossed over. The people buying slaves to import to the new world didn’t need to go into the bush to round up victims; they were able to buy them from Muslims, both black and Arab, and from leaders of tribes that had conquered other tribes. Also, we need to be aware that not all slaveholders in the US were white; there were black slave holders throughout the south. Just as there were blacks who fought for the south.

        I have no guilt over what happened 100 years prior to my birth. I had no contribution to it. I do believe it was wrong, but it wasn’t my fault. Nor do I believe I should feel any guilt due to my ancestors. My maternal ancestors came over from Germany in the mid-1800′s with just the clothes on their backs, settled in Texas, and opposed slavery in Texas. My paternal ancestors were poor British sea faring types from New England and were opposed to slavery.

        • Steve Fair

          Who said that you should feel guilty? This is a strawman piece designed to anger white bigots.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Concise and precise

          • Steve Fair

            This is all Frontpagemag.com is about. Throwing red meat to angry, scared white men and providing them with convenient scapegoats for their resentments.

          • American Patriot

            More black nationalist garbage coming from you, uptowntroll. Front Page Magazine is an informative website, unlike many left-wing websites. You simply just post propaganda to annoy conservatives and other patriots.

          • Drakken

            Your really are ignorant and stupid, white men are not scared you dumbazz, they are getting angry and your too dumb to see it, keep up the great work, the Balkanization continues.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Red meat” implies (as you used it) that these are emotional arguments intended to get the reader angry. It seems like you’re projecting your own values.

            Can you point to some passages that led you to this opinion, since that’s at least twice you’ve made that claim without supporting it with anything.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Steve Fair glpage • 9 hours ago: “Who said that you should feel guilty? This is a strawman piece designed to anger white bigots.”
            Angry about what? Where’s the straw man? I understand the article as advocating a more balanced look at history rather than the neo-Marxist critique where free nations, especially successful ones, are compared to the presumed perfection of a communist Utopia.

      • American Patriot

        Hey, dummy, nobody is trying to minimize the brutality of the Transatlantic slave trade nor slavery itself. What you try to do is justify black racism by smearing everyone else here as “racist”. You refuse to admit that Tim Wise hates other people of his own skin color.

  • Kafir911

    There has been little mention in any discussion of the Islamic Trans-Siberian slave trade where as many as 140 million slaves were captured and sold by black No. Africans. And American blacks converting to Islam? What a sad joke! A lot can be learned on this subject in under 9 minutes by visiting I.Q. Al-Rassoli’s “Lifting the Veil” website, Chapter #20: http://www.al-rassooli.com/blog/

    • tagalog

      There’s a Trans-Siberian slave trade of black Africans? If you’d said zeks, I’d believe it.

      • Kafir911

        What?

        • tagalog

          Your post refers to the “Islamic Trans-Siberian slave trade.” I was a bit bemused by that.

          I see you’ve now edited it – well done.

          Seems a little far north for Islam, but who knows?

  • pneville

    Black slavery was invented in Africa by Blacks and existed for a thousand years before the White man knew that you didn’t drop off the earth when you sailed south of the Sahara. Black slavery was ended in Africa by White Christians who made their government during the reign of Queen Victoria utilize its colonial power first to stop the slave trade and then to outlaw it in their colonies in Africa. The Africans resisted any change to their institution of slavery.

    • The March Hare

      And tribal people in all parts of the world that war with neighboring tribes quite often make slaves of them. This is nothing new. Sometimes kill all the men and keep the women and children as part of their tribe. Even the Native Americans did this and even enslaved the settlers they conquered, especially the women.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Black, white, Arab, Jewish, Asian slavery continue today.
      For example.
      Thousands of slaves in Israel, global study finds | The Times …

      http://www.timesofisrael.com › Israel & the Region

      The Times of IsraelOct 20, 2013 – Israel has as many as 8,500 slaves, according to a new comprehensive study of worldwide slavery. Israel placed 111 out of 162 slave-holding …

      • justinburch505

        Israel has an active campaign to free humans trafficked and arrest the perpetrators. Most of the slaves have been smuggled in by Bedouins trafficked via the Sinai using organized crime. You cannot put Israel in the same bucket with Arabs where no enforcement goes on. Where do you get this crap?And why out of 162 nations did you pick Israel as your example?

        • MrUniteUs1

          Good at least you are not in denial. Many right wing Jews in this country love to bring up slavery, to promote division between Black and White gentiles. But then they are in denial about Jewish involvement in the slave trade past and present. Likewise they love to pretends it’s breaking news that Africans were involved in the slave trade. AT the same time there in denial about “Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers”. See the book

          • American Patriot

            Many left-wing Muslims in this country and elsewhere argue about how Europeans were the main culprits in the African slave trade when in fact, Arab Muslims also participated in the slave trade as well. You are in denial about Muslim involvement in the slave trade past and present, Mr. DivideUs0.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Muslims were involved in the slave trade for centuries. Still are according to Boko Haram. I worked to get California to divest from Sudan because of the slavery and genocide in that country at the time. The effort was successful

  • Davros11

    Great article, wish it could be front page on all the nations newspapers for a week straight! Maybe then all this racist bull$hit will be over!

    • American1969

      Don’t count on it even then!

  • 1Indioviejo1

    The article omits the enslavement by the Roman Empire of conquered people, The Franks, The Belgii, the Teutones, The Britons, Celts, etc., etc., for a thousand years. Slavery was an economic neccessity in antiquity. We have the Egyptian Pyramids, Babylonia, The Roman Colisseum, and everything in between built by slaves and conquered peoples. The whiners today do so over an ignorant populace denied of a historical knowledge and perspective. They have their race hustlers who profit and distribute the spoils of their blackmail.

  • Viking.

    I am tired of hearing that white people are evil. How about a little appreciation for the achievements of European culture. It is humanity that is good or evil and that is the same everywhere for every race. If I were to say that Blacks are criminal and Muslims are terrorists I would be prosecuted but you can say what you like about white people they are not protected by anti-racism laws.

    • DennisMets

      . I have been to many countries and one thing I can
      tell you is the United States is one of the most murderous of them all.
      We have been sold on diversity but if you look around the world you
      see it does not work. Israel will forever be a blood bath with
      Muslims (Arabs) killing Jews. And despite what our president
      says he has made it clear he will stand with his Muslims and racist
      reverends to the end. The president’s reverends and heroes have made it clear
      they hate the devil whites and they will continue to program future generations
      of black youths to carry on the hate for the devil whites. If you take what
      black leaders, reverends and the panthers are saying about whites and put the
      words in a whites mouth about blacks there would be a nationwide freak show on
      about it. Now think about this hate and what they are doing to carry out the
      war on whites? Not only are they pushing to get as many Hispanics into the
      country to get them under the minority
      umbrella and to program them to hate whites they are bringing in thousands
      of Somalian Muslims and others and they are placing them in mostly small white
      communities. This is akin to promoting war because you have diverse
      cultures like black Muslims moving in on peaceful white communities and they
      are also programed to hate whites and think they are entitled. Make no mistake
      the overall plan is to push out whites and by bringing in Muslims that
      over breed everywhere they are you can see in a few generations how
      they will overwhelm the whites that are regulating their families to a
      smaller size in order to send them to good schools and live in safe
      neighborhoods. In other words whites are paying for getting these people
      here to murder and push them out. Anyone can
      see what crimes these Muslims have brought to us as
      refugees and what our congress has become, ESP. since the
      president has only appointed people that share his views of hate and
      entitlement like Sotomayor to make sure
      minorities have every advantage in the world handed to them. How could anyone
      think that refugees or illegals from another country should get
      preferential treatment over whites that have lived and
      worked for a living)? Black people have a tremendously
      powerful voice and when it speaks people shake and do crazy things, like
      the sponsors that pulled adds with the clippers. If whites had that much
      of a voice we could get a lot of racism stopped against us to. If you do not
      think there is a war on Christian Whites your naive and stupid, why else would
      you bring in thousands of Muslim refugees that make no secret their hate
      for Christians and put them in mostly small white Christian communities?
      Normally predators are outnumbered and breed by what they prey on
      otherwise they would run out of food. But in this case the Hispanics and the
      Muslim refugees are overwhelming the White Christians they prey on and that is
      by design. I guess whites will stand by and get exterminated
      while the white leaders in politics sell them out for a dollar.

  • Habbgun

    Funny part of it all is that in popular literature there is more acknowledgement of the Moslem past than in “scholarship”. With Fire and Sword (a polish historical novel), Robert E Howard stories and even Don Quixote all write about what life in the face of the Moslem enemy was like which was basically you were exposed to piracy, kidnapping and slavery.

  • Manial

    Slavery has taken a different form in todays world. Instead of Blacks being chained to a plantation they are chained to the Democratic party that promises them their livelihood. We are all being enslaved by an ever expanding and ever more powerful central government that restricts freedom and burdens us with massive taxes and debt.

  • Zundfolge

    I’m tired of all white people being stained with the sin of slavery because the truth is that no white people in America today are responsible for it and for most of us neither are our ancestors.

    The ancestors of the majority of white Americans came here AFTER the civil war.
    The ancestors of the majority of white Americans who fought (and died) in the civil war fought on the side of the north.
    The ancestors of the majority of white Americans (even those from the south) did not own slaves (any more than current Americans own heavy farm or industrial equipment).
    The ancestors of many white Americans (myself included) were abolitionists (my ancestors had homes that were stops on the underground railroad in Missouri, others were part of John Brown’s group).

    And here’s a dirty little secret, MOST African Americans are not of 100% pure slave blood … most have some white blood in their family history and much of that white blood is slave owner blood.

    So the truth is that if we are guilty for the sins of our ancestors, most African Americans are more guilty for their ancestors sin of slavery than whites.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Do you see the schizophrenia in your post.

      “So the truth is that if we are guilty for the sins of our ancestors,
      most African Americans are more guilty for their ancestors sin of
      slavery than whites.”

      Why do you feel guilty?

      • Steve Fair

        Get ‘em. They really don’t get it at all.

      • Zundfolge

        There’s nothing schizophrenic in my post.

        I don’t believe that anyone should be held guilty for the sins of their ancestors,
        but that’s not what the people hanging the sin of slavery on the necks
        of modern whites believe.

        My point is that those that believe that modern whites are somehow responsible for slavery because of their ancestors actions should realize that the average African American has a better chance to have ancestors that owned slaves than I or most other whites.

        I use such a shocking statement to point out the foolishness in blaming anyone for the sins of their ancestors.

        • MrUniteUs1

          So can you name some people that told you should feel guilty about slavery? What did they say, and when did say it? Next time you get all riled up check who wrote the article and where it’s published,

          Most than likely a right wing Jew. The reality is the white guilt myth is nothing more than a right wing fundraiser.

          .

          • American Patriot

            Your propaganda is more than likely from a left-wing Muslim. The reality is that reparations for slavery is nothing more than a left-wing fundraiser.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Not a left wing Muslims publication.
            Thousands of slaves in Israel, global study finds | The Times …
            http://www.timesofisrael.com › Israel & the Region
            The
            Times of IsraelOct 20, 2013 – Israel has as many as 8,500 slaves,
            according to a new comprehensive study of worldwide slavery. Israel
            placed 111 out of 162 slave-holding ..

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            You need to provide a link to the article you cut and pasted from – not just a top level link to the website.

  • royw

    Another fallacy is that whites kidnapped free blacks by raiding villages and dragging them to the boats.

    That would be dangerous and inefficient. Instead slave traders merely bought or traded for the SLAVES of blacks, that had been captured in tribal raids and warfare.

    • MrUniteUs1

      I wonder whose stupid enough to believe that fallacy?

      • Roywil
        • MrUniteUs1

          Do you agree with the last paragraph?
          If so Should, African, Jewish, European, and Muslim descendants of those involve slave trade apologize.

      • Roywil

        From “The Guardian”, article by David Smith
        Wednesday 18 November 2009

        African tribal leaders have been ordered to apologise for the role of their ancestors in the transatlantic trade.

        Traditional African rulers whose ancestors collaborated with European and Arab slave traders should follow Britain and the United States by publicly saying sorry, according to human rights organisations.

        The Civil Rights Congress of Nigeria has written to tribal chiefs
        saying: “We cannot continue to blame the white men, as Africans, particularly the traditional rulers, are not blameless.”

        The appeal has reopened a sensitive
        debate over the part some chiefs played in helping to capture their fellow Africans and sell them into bondage as part of the transatlantic slave trade.

        The congress argued that the ancestors of the chiefs had helped to raid and kidnap defenceless communities and traded them to Europeans. They should now apologise to “put a final
        seal to the history of slave trade”, it said.

        “In view of the fact that the Americans and Europe have accepted the cruelty of their roles and have forcefully apologised, it would be logical, reasonable and humbling if African traditional rulers … [can] accept blame and formally apologise to the descendants of the victims of their collaborative and exploitative slave trade.”

        Estimates vary that between 10 million and 28 million Africans were sent to the Americas and sold into slavery between 1450 and the early 19th century.

        More than a million are believed to have died in transit across the so-called “middle passage” of the Atlantic due to inhumane conditions aboard slave ships and the brutal crushing
        of any resistance.

        Three years ago Tony Blair described Britain’s participation as a “crime against humanity” and expressed his “deep sorrow”. The US Senate voted for an apology this year.

        Shehu Sani, head of the congress, said it was calling for traditional rulers to apologise now because they were
        seeking inclusion in a forthcoming constitutional amendment in Nigeria.

        “We felt that for them to have the moral standing to be part of our constitutional arrangement there are some historical issues for them to address,” he told the BBC World Service.
        “One part of which is the involvement of their institutions in the slave trade.”

        He said that on behalf of the buyers of slaves, the ancestors of the traditional rulers “raided communities and kidnapped people, shipping them away across the Sahara or across the
        Atlantic”.

        Many slaves captured inland in Africa died on the long journey to the coast.

        The position was endorsed by Henry Bonsu, a British-born broadcaster of Ghanaian descent who examined the issue in
        Ghana for a radio documentary. He said some chiefs had accepted responsibility and sought atonement by visiting Liverpool and the United States.

        “I interviewed a chief who acknowledged there was collaboration and that without that involvement we wouldn’t have seen human trafficking on an industrial scale,” said Bonsu, the co-founder of digital station Colourful Radio.

        “An apology in Nigeria might be helpful because the chiefs did some terrible things and abetted a major crime.”

        The non-government organisation Africa Human Right Heritage, based in Accra, Ghana, supports the campaign for
        an apology. Baffour Anning, its chief executive, said: “I certainly agree with the Nigeria Civil Rights Congress that the traditional leaders should render an apology for their role in the inhuman slavery administration.” He said it would accord with the UN’s position on human rights.

        But the issue was not a high priority for most African citizens, according to Bonsu. “In my experience it’s mainly the African diaspora who want an apology. People aren’t milling around
        Lagos or Accra moaning about why chiefs don’t apologise. They are more concerned about the everyday and why they still have bad governance.”

        Fred Swaniker, the founder of the African Leadership Academy, said: “I’m not sure whether an apology is needed, but it would be worth looking at and acknowledging the role Africa did play in the slave trade. Someone had to find the slaves and bring them before the Europeans.”

        The shameful history of some traditional leaders remains an awkward subject on which many politicians prefer to maintain silence. One exception was in 1998 when Yoweri Museveni, the president of Uganda, told an audience including Bill Clinton: “African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today.”

        • MrUniteUs1

          Roywill you forgot what you wrote.

          “Another fallacy is that whites kidnapped free blacks by raiding villages and dragging them to the boats.”

          I responded,
          I wonder whose stupid enough to believe that fallacy?

          The fallacy that whites kidnapped free blacks by raiding villages and dragging them to the boats.

          You failed to answer my question.

        • tagalog

          Whenever there’s some apology like the one you describe, I always puzzle over what purpose it’s going to serve. “Oh I’m sorry for what those who came before us did” doesn’t go very far. Stop apologizing and do something about the current problems, but of course such a course of action would require actually doing something constructive, a thing politicians are not good at doing.

      • cjkcjk

        Most, a majority of everyday people both black and white that I have met assumed that as truth. I have noticed that more and more people are aware of the truth as time goes on. Just my life experience.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Strange “Most, a majority of everyday people both black and white that I have met discuss other issue” Well now you can tell them Jews, Muslims, Christians, Africans, Americans, Europeans were involved in the slave trade.
          Also rent a copy of Roots.

          • cjkcjk

            Did you listen to what i wrote? WTF does a reading a copy of roots have to do with what I just said? I STATED A FACT OF MY EXPERIENCE IN REPLY TO YOUR INQUIERY

          • MrUniteUs1

            Well if you saw Roots or read the book like millons of Americans, you would know that the main character Kunte Kinte was captured by Africans. Not exactly breaking news. Get a copy and recommend it. Also use the ole noggin. Kind of silly to think that some white crew members walked ashore a and captured all those Africans all by themselves.

          • cjkcjk

            I guess you have zero reading comprehension.
            Use the ole noggin, I could have seen roots a hundred times and it still wouldn’t have changed what I just said you genius.

    • tagalog

      It was the Muslim slave traders like Tippu Tib, well-known to all who explored Africa in the 19th Century, who led parties into the interior, shot all who resisted, chained the rest, and marched them off to the coast to sell to the slavers in their ships offshore. No one knows how many villages the Muslim slave raiders destroyed to the last person during that time.

  • barrycooper

    Leftists do not oppose slavery per se: they easily condone it in Communist nations. Slavery is merely a propaganda tool, one used in pursuit of the only goal they honestly pursue: the cessation of political freedom. They pursue generalized slavery through the device of rhetorically opposing it. They truly are People of the Lie.

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      And in Muslim countries as well.

  • MrUniteUs1

    He could have added Boko Haram and Israel.

    Thousands of slaves in Israel, global study finds | The Times …
    http://www.timesofisrael.com › Israel & the Region
    The Times of IsraelOct 20, 2013 – Israel has as many as 8,500 slaves, according to a new comprehensive study of worldwide slavery. Israel placed 111 out of 162 slave-holding …

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Israel today has slavery? You and Steve Fair would make a good pair.

      • Steve Fair

        You have a real problem with facts, don’t you? http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0606/S00219.htm

        • ahad_ha_amoratsim

          Your link is a 2006 story from some unknown news source in New Zealand who claims Israel is trying to starve the Palestinians into submission. Hardly a creditable source. Your article aslo notes, though, that the exploitation of guest workers is illegal in Israel, and that when abuses — which apparently are (or in 2006 were) too frequent are called to the attention of the legal authorities, the perpetrators are punished.

          “Both Israeli law and an international treaty the country has signed prohibit charging workers a commission for finding a work place. Nevertheless, it is a known fact that all migrant workers who arrive to Israel pay thousands of dollars to mediation agencies. As this commission is illegal under Israeli law, agencies usually charge the fee in the country of origin and the fee is divided between the mediating agency in Israel and its representative agency in the country of origin.”

          The Times of Israel is discussing sexual trafficking, which is of course a form of slavery — one that is illegal in Israel and is all too common in many places, including the US.

          From the Times article ”

          Related Topics

          slavery

          prostitution

          foreign workers

          Israel has as many as 8,500 slaves, according to a new comprehensive study of worldwide slavery. Israel placed 111 out of 162 slave-holding countries in the Global Slavery Index 2013, recently published by the Australian Walk Free Foundation. Mauritania was found to have the most serious slavery problem.

          Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email
          and never miss our top stories Free Sign up!

          According to the study, the first-ever country-by-country survey of its kind, Israel has 7,700 to 8,500 slaves. Still, Israel ranked well relative to the lower standards in the Middle East, though Lebanon, Tunisia, and Egypt scored better than the Jewish state.

          The Palestinian Authority and the Hamas-run Gaza Strip were not covered by the survey.

          Israel did place well in the study’s examination of the risk of enslavement. The survey measured five factors to determine the policies adopted by the country to combat slavery, human rights, human and economic development, political stability, and women’s rights. Israel was the only Middle Eastern country to enjoy a low risk-of-slavery ranking, but still ranked much lower than European states”

          Read more: Thousands of slaves in Israel, global study finds | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/thousands-of-slaves-in-israel-global-study-finds/#ixzz31ojmRIxO
          Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

          Your post makes it appear that you were talking about legalized chattel slavery. You chose to lie by innuendo and omission instead.

      • MrUniteUs1

        You are in denial. Read the Times of Israel article. Or just google slavery in Israel.

    • cjkcjk

      When you seem to compare Israel with Boko Haram you lose credibility with fair honest people. No denying that Israel has problems, but Boko Haram IS a problem.

      • MrUniteUs1

        You seem to have a vivid imagination. No comparision made by me. If you to make a comparison then go right ahead.

        • cjkcjk

          No you seem to not understand how your words are taken

        • cjkcjk

          You’re either stupid, ignorant, or disingenuous

  • Race_Dissident

    Hmmm. I wonder when a Spielberg or a Weinstein will produce a major motion picture about Anthony Johnson and John Casor?

  • tagalog

    An honest discussion of race in America would include the question, “Why does the Boko Haram (or however it’s spelled) threaten to sell schoolgirls in a slave market that appears to be alive and well in the Muslim world in 2014 A.D., with hardly a murmur about it, while American racemongers dwell on American slavery, which was brought to an end a century and a half ago?” Or “Where is Eric Holder on THAT?” You don’t think he’s a coward about having a discussion on that, do you?

    Where are the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of the world? Why aren’t they calling out for a new international initiative to put a stop to the Muslim slave trade?

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Because Boko Haram are black, and they are Muslim, making that discussion both racist and Islamophobic, by definition. You know, like Ms. Harsi.

    • Steve Fair

      What does kidnapping and rape in Nigeria have to do with race in America?

      • tagalog

        Nothing.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        Exactly. You want to hold us up to an otherworldly standard of perfection. That’s what neo-Marxists do.

        A little objectivity goes a long way.

    • American Patriot

      They are probably with the Jeremiah Wrights and Louis Farrakhans working to promote racism, race-baiting, black nationalism and other ridiculous things on their agendas.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Wow!

    Israel’s Dirty Little Secret –
    Slavery
    By Genevieve Cora
    Fraser

    Three months ago, on Thursday, March
    30, 2006, the Israeli High Court struck down Israel’s
    slavery law that had been on the books since 1952.
    According to the Israeli Human Rights organization Kav
    LaOved, “The view of migrant workers in Israel as the
    employers’ property is reflected above all (in) the “binding
    arrangement” which makes the worker the employer’s slave.”

    Section 6 of the Entry to Israel Law, 1952, a.k.a. the
    Binding Agreement, grants the Interior Minister the power
    ‘to stipulate conditions in a visa or in a residence permit,
    compliance with which shall be a condition for the validity
    of the visit or the residence permit’. As applied by the
    Interior Ministry, “the work permit belongs not to the
    worker but to the employer; the worker is in fact bound or
    fettered to the specific employer whose name is stamped in
    his passport. Such binding to an employer is an imperative
    condition for the worker’s legal status in Israel,”
    according to a Kav LaOved statement issued in 2004.

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0606/S00219.htm

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Fromthe Times of Israel article:

      “Israel did place well in the study’s examination of the risk of enslavement. The survey measured five factors to determine the policies adopted by the country to combat slavery, human rights, human and economic development, political stability, and women’s rights. Israel was the only Middle Eastern country to enjoy a low risk-of-slavery ranking, but still ranked much lower than European states.”

      • MrUniteUs1

        Yep. But the truth people are still buying and selling slaves in Israel. The denial continues. Why?

        • Drakken

          You haven’t seen the white slave trade through the muslim Balkans into the ME and North Africa, ten times worse.

        • ahad_ha_amoratsim

          Does Israel have criminals, including organized crime? Of course it does. Do they engage in illegal human trafficking? Yes. Is the Israeli government trying to stamp out the problem? Yes.
          The same could be said of most countries, including the US and the UK.
          The denial is to your implication that chattel slavery (legal or illegal) exists in Israel, that the trafficking is legal, or that the government there condones it.

        • ahad_ha_amoratsim

          Saying that there are a handful of people in Israel who are illegally engaged in the slave trade (if in fact that’s what it is) is a far cry from saying that Israel is involved in the slave trade, or is akin to Boko Haram, isn’t it?

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      I read the 2006 article you are quoting from some unknown New Zealand web site that also claims Israel is trying to starve the Palestinians. The article is about the abuse of guest workers, which is against Israeli law, and discusses efforts of an Israeli NGO to combat the problem. The article also shows that when instances are brought to the government’s attention, the criminals involved are punished, and discusses how the NGO is trying to get more tools for the government to fight the problem.
      After reading the article and your post, Johnny, someone might almost think that you were trying to smear Israel by creating the misleading and false impression that legalized chattel slavery exists there.

      • UCSPanther

        The anti-Israel crowd has an extremely hard time with the truth.

        Since it does not fit their narrative, they have to distort and fabricate in order for it to fit.

        • ahad_ha_amoratsim

          Yeah, I’ve noticed that too.
          People who hate Jews tend to hate truth. And morality.

          • MrUniteUs1

            People who hate groups of people tend to hate the truth and morality. The truth is Jews, were also involved in the slave trade.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Just stating the fact slavery exist in Israel.
          Jews for and against slavery can be found throughout
          history. This includes Israel and the USA. The problem right wing Jews love to point fingers at others, and then cry anti-semitism, when it’s mentioned that Jews were also involved in the slavery.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Slavery”

            We’re all slaves until global communism is a reality.

            “Truth”

          • liz

            Hmmmm. Kinda like how left-wing blacks love to point fingers at others, and then cry racism, when it’s mentioned that blacks were also involved in slavery.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Hmm. Zero examples to back up your nonsensical claim liz. It’s nonsensical to believe that 30 white crew members off a slave ship could capture hundreds of Africans and load them on to slave ships without the help of Africans. Do you agree? Did you see Roots. Kunte Kinte was captured by Africans. I think you projecting your denial that Jews were involved in the slave trade, and served in Hitler’s army.

          • liz

            Zero examples? That’s all you’ve been blabbing on about this whole time, ad nauseam. Like you might just be a little obsessed with it.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Not at all Liz. I don’t deny that Blacks were involved in the slave trade. Do you deny that Jews were involved in the slave trade and served in Hitler’s army? As for obsession whine to the person that wrote the article and FPM for posting it.

          • liz

            I’m not denying anything. If you don’t deny that blacks were involved in the slave trade then why do you object to the article? He’s simply making a point that has been ignored by most people till now. He doesn’t have to cover the entire history of slavery to make a valid point.
            You’re the one obsessively inserting anti-Semitic rants here.

          • MrUniteUs1

            No but to repeatedly mention Muslim and omit Jewish involvement in the slave trade is a serious error of omission. The point that has been ignored, by most people until now is the Jewish involvement in the slave trade. You say Black, White, Arab, Muslim, but you can’t say Jewish with about being accused of anti-semitism What did I write that was anti-Semitic in your opinion?.

          • liz

            It’s a “serious error of omission” to you because you’re so obsessed with “right wing Jews who love to point fingers at others”.
            That’s an anti Semitic stereotyping of Jews.

          • UCSPanther

            Getting caught by the wrong people in any country can lead to getting enslaved.

            So what?

          • MrUniteUs1

            So why continue to deny the Jewish involvement in the slave trade.

          • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

            chongos

    • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

      bantu

      • 95Theses

        And let’s not forget that Piers Morgan patronizingly referred to Rachel Jeantel as “one smart cookie”. I was embarrassed for her … and I mean that as a kindness to her seeing as how Morgan obviously exploited her for his show’s ratings. Shameful.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u368FaF6WT0

  • Norman

    Who cares? I don’t owe any Negro anything. I’ve succeeded through hard work and dedication despite anti-constitutional “Affirmative Action” policies.

    • Steve Fair

      You don’t have anything the “Negro” wants. Keep your trailer and meth lab.

      • Norman

        Let’s compare W-2 forms for the past 20 years and see who “wanted what from whom”. Negroes make up less than 13% of the population and account for over half of the violent crime. Source: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expandhomicidemain How’d you like those apples?

        • MrUniteUs1

          Wall Street wanted $700 billion. Next

          • Norman

            That’s what I thought. Deleted your original response too I see…Now go have a miserable rest of your life and remember no one owes you anything.

          • MrUniteUs1

            You’re just jealous because I look better than you.

          • Norman

            You are one handsome devil, I’ll give you that!

          • 95Theses

            Not so sure about the handsome part. Oh wait! You were being sarcastic! Ha ha!

          • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

            chongo

          • 95Theses

            Scroll past the troll.

    • MrUniteUs1

      That’s nice, neither do I. I don’t owe anyone anything.
      No more House or car notes. AA is mainly for whites. White women, white disabled, white veterans are eligible for AA. Add to that the white legacy admissions, the white well connected, and the white wealthy, displace more qualified whites every year.

  • Kafir911

    My apologies tagalog. I meant Trans-Saharan. : (

  • fingerroll

    I’m willing to bet that there aren’t too many people alive who can’t trace their family history back to some sort of slavery.

  • tomads

    The Party of SLAVERY is the DEMOCRAT Party,

    which invented Jim Crow, and

    created the KKK as its militia to enforce Jim Crow, and

    impeded the efforts of the REPUBLICAN PARTY,

    which was BORN TO FREE SLAVES,

    which it accomplished within a score of years,

    to integrate persons of color into the American mainstream.

    The Party of Slavery (D) also forbade education for slaves…

    I suggest you ignore that prohibition…

    • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

      maybe so , think i would had been a democrat back then ..

  • Seek

    Our national “conversation” on race is more like an abusive monologue. Blacks do the talking, accusing and hectoring; whites do the listening, groveling and atoning. A real conversation would involve articles like these as a reference point. Good work, Mr. Kerwick.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Who abused you?

      • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

        chongo

      • 95Theses

        To all my FPM family — please, please, PLEASE. Ignore this troll, he contributes nothing worth value. For all we know he is Steve-o Fair hiding behind yet another nom de guerre.
        And always …

        Scroll past the troll.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Interesting to note commentators here ran from the history of White slavery
    From the article.
    “All this is heavily documented in such neglected pieces of scholarship as Robert Davis Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800 and Paul Baepler’s White Slaves, African Masters: An Anthology of American Barbary Captivity Narratives.

    Nor is it just that millions of whites in Europe were made to toil in bondage for hundreds of years. Don Jordan’s White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America and Michael Hoffman’s They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America impeccably
    establish that whites were enslaved in colonial America as well.
    Moreover, these brave authors show that the conditions that whites,
    including, most tragically, white children, had to endure both en
    route to the colonies as well as once they arrived were at least as
    dreadful as those experienced by Africans.”

  • MrUniteUs1

    From the Jewish Daily the Forward.

    Jews Mostly Supported Slavery — Or Kept Silent — During Civil War

    Civil War Transformed Community in North and South

    Read more: http://forward.com/articles/179441/jews-mostly-supported-slavery-or-kept-silent-d/?p=all#ixzz31pxmzOic

    • Steve Fair

      More truth.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        More collectivism.

        col·lec·tiv·ism noun kə-ˈlek-ti-ˌvi-zəm
        : a political or economic system in which the government owns businesses, land, etc.

        Full Definition of COLLECTIVISM

        1: a political or economic theory advocating collective control especially over production and distribution; also : a system marked by such control

        2: emphasis on collective rather than individual action or identity

    • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

      “mayate”, “chongo”

  • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

    Embrace Segregation, it will save us all

    • MrUniteUs1

      90% of all crimes committed against whites are committed by whites

      The sheriff of a small county in northeast North Carolina says he is
      “disgusted” by the parents of six men who are accused of sexually
      abusing their sister for nearly a decade, at a private family compound.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/13/jackson-family-abuse_n_5317197.html

      • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

        You make horrible neighbors.
        You make too much noise .
        You live your lives in perpetual adolescence.
        You have little self control.
        Your spoken english is cringe worthy.
        You dress like circus freaks.
        You have no manners.
        Everywhere you congregate suddenly becomes the “bad part of town”.
        You demand respect but do little to earn it.
        You take and rarely give.
        You do not know the meaning of “forgiveness”.
        You take every golden opportunity given you and return contempt.

        • dennis x

          Then stop ALL gentrification!!! You whites moved to the suburbs now stay there that’s what malls are for!!

          • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

            simpl. . . .your incapable of doing it . . . .the pendulum swings . . .

    • American Patriot

      Shut up, David Duke, Jr. You are a horrible racist. Learn to be tolerant towards other people, a**hole.

      • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

        Go hide your apologist self, you’ll only be a victim ..

        • American Patriot

          Why do you want to embrace segregation anyway? That is not an American value. Segregationists are no better than the radical left and its Islamist allies. You do not combat one by embracing the other. They must both be repudiated by the American people.

      • healthydude

        Boy, the truth sure angers some people so badly that they have to resort to the dreaded “R” word! But that’s okay, whites are starting to become immune to the voodoo of the blacks and white leftists.

  • DurkaDurka

    They also neglect to mention that the SOB in the White House’s family is the one enslaving blacks today via the Muslim Brotherhood/Saudi Arabia/Qatar. Malik Obama is their slave pimp CFO.

  • L.S.

    Just last week I finished a great book on the subject of white slaves (kidnapped by African Muslims in the 1700s) entitled “WHITE GOLD” by Giles Milton. These Islamic slave traders declared war on the whole of Christendom in European countries.
    I recommend it. It was a real eye opener to me. (Purchased it on Amazon.com)

  • liberman

    Could African slaves off the boat speak any English?
    Read any clock, read at all,
    had any construction skills,
    any quantitative skills,
    any notion of procedures or reporting?
    Thus were people of very little use initially.

    The Gospel forbids slavery,
    by means of forbidding even mastery
    of a man over another man.

    Not so Islam – which by name means subjugation

    to the way of the earthly man Moukhammad,

    who was a mass murderer and enslaver
    e.g. took the wifes of the Jews of Medina
    (it was a Jewish town from the start)
    to concubines having murdered their husbands.

    Thus when Obama said Islam shaped America

    he spoke the truth! Likewise the part of the US
    constitution which renders null and void

    international agreements, by means of rendering
    them internal law of the USA namely
    by the house of representatives,
    which can later changed them down to cancellation.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Africans knew farming. Before Africans arrived in Jamestown. ..

      Researchers: Jamestown settlers resorted to cannibalism

      http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/01/us/jamestown-cannibalism/

      • liberman

        Some did and many didn’t.
        Most likely those caught and enslaved were not up to protecting themselves. Anyhow- no European languages, no machines,
        no clocks. I raised the point of low relevance in order to suggest
        that Black imports fresh out of Africa were not a panacea.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Liberman what do you think about the English Jamestown settlers becoming cannibals. Good thing you weren’t there.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            We know that there are Arab cannibals in Syria.

      • http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time+left+until+Obama+leaves+office John Barleycorn

        Blacks by and large seem incredibly shallow when it comes to race , , , so upset about how some white person chooses not to associate with Blacks but oddly silent on issues like black violence towards whites(knockout game, black flash mobs . . .etc) very little from black american’s on these issues, but by God don’t let a white person say llegro . . . .all hades breaks loose …

  • Dr. Heidi Bach

    ShariaLaw= SLAVERY’sTEMPLATE ……..YOU CAN do ONE THING to stop implementation of sharia here, there, EVERYWHERE:YOU, WE CAN make a phone call, attach the letter…HELP HER

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Hanging a Mother for Her Faith

    Why the Government of Sudan Plans to Execute a Christian Mother for Her Faith, and What You Can Do to Help Save Her

    05/15/2014 Washington D.C. (International Christian Concern) – Meriam Ibrahim lived a relatively peaceful life amidst the perpetual tumult that has plagued Sudan over the course of its modern history. In the mere decades following its independence from colonial rule in 1957, Sudan has suffered two tragic civil wars; the first lasted 18 years and saw to the death of more than half a million people, 400,000 of whom were civilians.

    Sadly, the history of that first conflict has largely determined Sudan’s seemingly unbreakable pattern of dramatic rises to power, followed by crushing betrayals, followed by violent reprisals: a pattern that has not only lead to the current-day reign of Sudan’s ruling regime, but that is exemplified in the country’s criminal dictator, Omar al-Bashir.

    Having usurped power from then-Prime Minister Sadiq al-Madhi, al-Bashir has increasingly tightened his relentless grip of power over the nation’s affairs, committing gross human rights violations, including crimes against humanity (especially in the Darfur conflict, which has claimed as many as 461,000 innocent lives and displaced 2,500,000 more, according to the United Human Rights Council), sponsoring extreme Islamist ideologies, and implementing discriminatory and sectarian Islamization and Arabization policies.

    Having harbored terrorists and terrorist organizations including Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, Khartoum, under al-Bashir, has changed from the “Paris of 1960′s Africa” to an Islamist stronghold bent on enforcing Shari’ah law and eliminating the city’s, and eventually the nation’s, Christian populations. Adopting a Public Order Criminal Code in 1991, under the counsel of Hassan al-Turabi, a famed Sunni radical who has been referred to as Islam’s “Pope of terrorism,” the al-Bashir regime has committed itself to public floggings, amputations, and even executions by crucifixion.

    In order to enforce its Public Order Criminal Code, Sudan has established a special police force and court system and police force to arrest, detain, try, and eventually punish violators. It was this special police force that arrested and arbitrarily detained Meriam Yahia Ibrahim, an innocent Christian mother pregnant with her second child, on February 17, 2014.

    At age six, Meriam’s Muslim father left her family permanently, freeing her mother to raise Meriam as an Orthodox Christian. A Khartoum University graduate and licensed medical doctor, Meriam later married Daniel Wani, a South Sudanese Christian and United States citizen. About a year and a half later, Meriam gave birth to their first son, Martin, now 20 months old, who was arrested and arbitrarily detained with his mother. They now languish together in federal prison for Meriam’s faith in Christ and faithful marriage to her legal husband.

    As a Sudanese national, Meriam is considered a Muslim by birth. And, according to the Public Order Criminal Code, Muslim women cannot legally marry a man of any religion other than Islam and no Muslim, regardless of gender, age, or creed, can choose to leave Islam. Choosing to leave Islam is considered apostasy, and the price for an apostate is always the same: death.

    Charged with adultery and apostasy by the El Haj Yousif Public Order Court in Khartoum on March 4 and convicted of those same charges on March 11, Meriam now faces 100 lashes and a death sentence. That is, unless Meriam chooses to deny her Christian faith in court and publicly accept Islam, the religion prescribed to her by birth, in which case she would only be sentenced to 100 lashes for her “adulterous” marriage.

    And so, Meriam has been left with a choice that no free, dignified human being should ever have to face: succumb to forceful conversion and be spared, or exercise her right to freedom of conscience, to stand strong in her faith and, as consequence, to be put to death for believing in the death, and resurrection, of her Savior.

    What You Can Do:

    Join International Christian Concern (ICC) in dedicating your social media to speak out #ForMeriam!

    Join ICC in calling on Sudan’s embassies around the world to demand Meriam’s immediate and unconditional release:

    United States

    202 338 8565

    United Kingdom

    +44 20 7839 8080

    Canada

    +1 613 235 4000

    Belgium

    +32 2 647 9494

    Germany

    +49 30 8906980

    France

    +33 1 4225 5571

    Should you experience issues in reaching your embassy by phone, please feel free to write your embassy’s staff using their contact form on their respective site, or by mailing them at the addresses provided below the template. We’ve provided a template below which you can feel free to copy and paste or modify, or you can draft your message in your own words to respectfully explain to the government of Sudan why you believe Meriam should be set free:

    Dear Embassy Representative,

    Let me first thank you for taking note of my email.

    I would like to bring the attention of the Government of Sudan the case of Meriam Yahia Ibrahim, a Christian mother eight months pregnant with her second child. She is a Sudanese national, University of Khartoum graduate, licensed medical professional, caring mother and faithful wife to her husband, a United States citizen.

    On 17 February, Public Order officials in Khartoum arrested and arbitrarily detained Meriam and her 20-month-old son, in violation of her human right to a fair and public trial, according to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Sudan is party.

    On 4 March, the El Haj Yousif Public Order Court in Khartoum handed down charges of adultery and apostasy to Meriam for legally marrying a professed Christian and for expressing her Christian faith, in violation of her human right to the free practice of religion, according to the ICCPR. to which Sudan is party.

    On May 11, that same court convicted Meriam on charges of adultery and apostasy, punishable by 100 lashes and death respectively, according to Sudan’s 1991 Public Order Criminal Code. Today, 15 May, Meriam will be subjected to calls by the Sudan Fatwa Council that she convert to Islam, or be placed before the court once again for the handing down of the above sentences.

    As such, I write your Embassy today to respectfully ask the Government of Sudan immediately and unconditionally release Meriam, dropping all charges and foregoing all sentences, so that she and her children, born and unborn, may return to their husband and father.

    Thank you once again for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely,

    [Your Name]

    United States

    2210 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC 20008

    United Kingdom

    3 Cleveland Row, St James London SW1A 1DD

    Canada

    354 Stewart St

    Ottawa, Ontario

    Belgium

    Ave Franklin Roosevelt 124

    1050 Brussels

    Germany

    Kurfürstendamm 151

    10709 Berlin

    France

    11 Rue Alfred Dehodencq

    75016 Paris

    For interviews, contact William Stark, Regional Manager for Africa:

    RM-AfricaAsia@persecution.org

    # # #

    • MrUniteUs1

      Thank you for sharing. I’ll help spread the word.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Off to celebrate with my niece. She just graduated with a Masters degree.
    Have a great weekend in our great country.

  • tagalog

    It’s always much easier to blame Israel. They will respond civilly and non-violently, while if you condemn the Muslims, they’ll start bombing you and flying your airplanes into buildings while capturing your people and sawing their heads off on TV. Can’t risk that…

  • Drakken

    Gotta jut love affirmative action at it’s best and 51% of the population too dumb to know better. Dumbazzes like you keep pushing the envelope, expecting crackers to just roll over for you and your ilk, those days are coming to an end. Your just too goddamn ignorant to see it.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    It is a “black man” that is fomenting the race war today.

  • Drakken

    The arabs and turks were far more cruel to the sub-sahara africans than us meany whites ever where.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    You don’t need to have conversations. You have Critical Theory. You know everything about everyone already.

  • Drakken

    Yes, I have, numerous times. Europeans, Ukrainians, Russians and various other young women taken by arabs and sold by them, nothing worse on this earth than white slavers.

  • Drakken

    It is not a threat shortbus, again, you have a real problem with reading comprehension, in case you haven’t noticed, race relations in this country are the worst they have ever been and are slowly coming to a boil, those are facts and you can chose to ignore it, I frankly don’t give a damn.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    Look Steve, I think you’re not listening. You have not demonstrated an objective understanding of any history.

    Let’s start at the beginning and follow a timeline so that we can judge people who did things that today are considered unacceptable.

    When did slavery begin? When were people “enslaved?”

    Who enslaved the vast majority of African slaves that came to America? Who bought them and imported them? Who was the global sovereign responsible for regulating and enforcing international law during this time?

  • objectivefactsmatter

    I get it. It’s just that “class action” and political lawsuits don’t always lead to justice.

    I don’t think it’s “wrong” to put together a case. It’s the particular way that it was handled. The communists got involved. That’s the problem, you don’t know who’s really driving your movements and who the ultimate thought leaders are.

    It’s unfortunate for “blacks” that institutions found established people to be more reliable than those who had been (relatively) recently freed. So some things should be done about this under some reasonable, fact based process. The argument is not that nothing should be done. The arguments against the current political calls for “social justice” are that it only ever ends in communism, because your leaders have been brainwashed about how to formulate their demands and how businesses actually work to create wealth.

  • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

    Right on!

  • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

    Good Lord, does whitey have to explain that to you too? You want us to do all your Google research and answer all your questions. Is there anything you’re willing to do for yourself without the aid of the white man’s superior wisdom and intelligence? Nomesayin?

  • objectivefactsmatter

    He constantly signals that he’s out for “social justice” and using proxies to denounce “systemic racism” and calling for the nation to look at everything through the CRT lens.

    CRT is about fomenting race wars. Now some might intend for it to be a cold war, but when you call for war, don’t act surprised when it gets hot.

    A man in his position could potentially do the opposite by using positive reinforcement and reminding people of both the need for justice according to the constitution while at the same time calling for radicals to have cooler heads. Since after all, how bad can America be if a “black man” can get elected POTUS? That should be a huge opportunity to celebrate progress.

    Radicals don’t want to celebrate progress. They want their constituents aching for radical reform. That means facts must go out the window unless those facts serve the mendacious agenda required to get people angry about the alleged “injustice of the system.”

    He got elected and now he acts like a victim even while sitting in the White House. And it seems like you actually believe he is being criticized because he’s “black.” Because the communists want you to believe that.

    Instead of affirming and celebrating progress, he’s turned himself in to a narrative about how the system can’t be fixed even if a “black man” sits in the White House, because the constitution is not good enough. “White Republicans” (any opposition) are “too racist” and so forth.

    These are radical revolutionaries. It seems like you might be too. The problem is that all of their theories are based on fallacies and in many cases outright lies.

  • oicu

    Justice for them means Just-Us! Not you, just-us! The term justice means justice when one is honest. Anytime you see ‘social justice’ you know there’s an agenda! Period! When justice is justice, one need not bother with the ‘social’ nor anything else, for the result of justice is just treatment.

  • tomads

    I’M SORRY!

    you are over-analyzing Obama!

    He’s the son of commie atheists…

    who bows to Putin and other enemies…

    and enjoys the destruction he wreaks on the USA and the free world!

  • MrUniteUs1

    What did you do? Morepeople need to know about this.

  • cjkcjk

    Maybe because we are all PEOPLE and should be universally held to the same standards PERIOD!

  • Drakken

    We made them disappear back to Europe where the Catholic Church and now the Orthodox Church took them in and got them off the drugs they were on and rehabbed and counseled them, to either go on to better lives or back to their families and countries of origin.

  • Renaissance Nerd

    Salute!

  • tomads

    In Harlem we would have described him as JIVE…