<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Democratic Party and Karl Marx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: plsilverman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5443196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plsilverman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5443196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[welfare state? ya mean the Corporate welfare recipients? the top 1% with all their tax relief that even Romney &amp; Ryan said they would end? by the way, you may have noticed the implementation of WELFARE REFORM, the vision of Reagan: no job search, no check...aw U knew that. but the corporate level &quot;recipients&quot; have no such accountability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welfare state? ya mean the Corporate welfare recipients? the top 1% with all their tax relief that even Romney &amp; Ryan said they would end? by the way, you may have noticed the implementation of WELFARE REFORM, the vision of Reagan: no job search, no check&#8230;aw U knew that. but the corporate level &#8220;recipients&#8221; have no such accountability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plsilverman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5443194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plsilverman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5443194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice recitation of RNC clichés...some going back to JOhn Birch, circa. 1962. When Dems continue GOP programs are they just toying with us? Is it is evil to fight for Civil and Voting Rights? (and, no, it was the DEms who got thru the &#039;60s legislation, if U factor out the Conservative DINOS, the Dixiecrats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice recitation of RNC clichés&#8230;some going back to JOhn Birch, circa. 1962. When Dems continue GOP programs are they just toying with us? Is it is evil to fight for Civil and Voting Rights? (and, no, it was the DEms who got thru the &#8217;60s legislation, if U factor out the Conservative DINOS, the Dixiecrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plsilverman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5440426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plsilverman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5440426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[who is &quot;exploiting&quot; the &quot;working man&quot; today? the most Obstructionist House in history. they want to keep unemployment as high as possible into NOvember, 2016.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who is &#8220;exploiting&#8221; the &#8220;working man&#8221; today? the most Obstructionist House in history. they want to keep unemployment as high as possible into NOvember, 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plsilverman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5440424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plsilverman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5440424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what a seriously retro piece of writing...Karl Marx? the Dems today are Gloalists which is Capitalism on steroids. all garbage: we have commeez in RUssia and China and very few other places. superficial scanning of second rate history books makes us think that if the DEms are pro-working class they must be totally envious and even want insurrection against the &quot;rich&quot;. they are pro-Union, pro-minimum wage hikes, pro Labor laws. If any group is Marxist today, it is the TP Caucus, stultifying the poor and middle by blocking job creation bills, as part of their 01-20-09 meeting to plan unprece4dented obstruction &gt; note the record # of filibusters and clotures on Obama&#039;s jobs bills &gt; note all the REd states returning job stimulus $$$$.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a seriously retro piece of writing&#8230;Karl Marx? the Dems today are Gloalists which is Capitalism on steroids. all garbage: we have commeez in RUssia and China and very few other places. superficial scanning of second rate history books makes us think that if the DEms are pro-working class they must be totally envious and even want insurrection against the &#8220;rich&#8221;. they are pro-Union, pro-minimum wage hikes, pro Labor laws. If any group is Marxist today, it is the TP Caucus, stultifying the poor and middle by blocking job creation bills, as part of their 01-20-09 meeting to plan unprece4dented obstruction &gt; note the record # of filibusters and clotures on Obama&#8217;s jobs bills &gt; note all the REd states returning job stimulus $$$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leehardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5408199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leehardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5408199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be short and to the point, you are full of crap!  Not a rat&#039;s rear clue about anything and anyone that wastes so many words stating the republicans the source of problems is causing the misery of gays, and abortion mongers who advocate killing babies in the womb..You speak like a lying Marxist filled with fascist ranting and blaming Republicans for all things wrong in America.  The religious right transforming the party???? Really stupid!~  And all bimbos like you need to do is go on line and look at the wealth of the Democratic and Republican politicians sitting in Congress...big problem today is a Geriatric congress, both Dems and Republicans, bunch of shriveled brained old men and women, many of great wealth from both sides...stop your stupid distortions....your ignorance is scary!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be short and to the point, you are full of crap!  Not a rat&#8217;s rear clue about anything and anyone that wastes so many words stating the republicans the source of problems is causing the misery of gays, and abortion mongers who advocate killing babies in the womb..You speak like a lying Marxist filled with fascist ranting and blaming Republicans for all things wrong in America.  The religious right transforming the party???? Really stupid!~  And all bimbos like you need to do is go on line and look at the wealth of the Democratic and Republican politicians sitting in Congress&#8230;big problem today is a Geriatric congress, both Dems and Republicans, bunch of shriveled brained old men and women, many of great wealth from both sides&#8230;stop your stupid distortions&#8230;.your ignorance is scary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leehardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5408197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leehardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5408197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our education system is a nightmare in America..mediocre teachers, lots of child predators and the Teacher&#039;s Union who has spent about 50 years destroying the educational system in America causing us to drop to the bottom list of quality education...All this bull crap being dumped on innocent minds and of course, 10 commandments, God and the foundation of our country excised by Atheists and Democrats....Chaos in our schools and little learning but keep God out!  But suppose they will soon drag in Muslim Moolas with their mad babbling and hate philosophies....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our education system is a nightmare in America..mediocre teachers, lots of child predators and the Teacher&#8217;s Union who has spent about 50 years destroying the educational system in America causing us to drop to the bottom list of quality education&#8230;All this bull crap being dumped on innocent minds and of course, 10 commandments, God and the foundation of our country excised by Atheists and Democrats&#8230;.Chaos in our schools and little learning but keep God out!  But suppose they will soon drag in Muslim Moolas with their mad babbling and hate philosophies&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leehardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5408196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leehardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5408196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marx was a spoiled guy wanting to live the rich life without exerting effort..Unfortunately his father did not leave him the inherit the huge amount of money he mistakenly thought his father had.  Marx self serving and full of himself and a proper diagnoses could easily be assigned to this narcissistic sycophant who was a mediocre little dweeb and why anyone would give credence to his writings seems unbelievable...like keeping Mein Kamp near by for reference!   A pompous lazy eternal student who thought himself of superior intellect!  Not!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marx was a spoiled guy wanting to live the rich life without exerting effort..Unfortunately his father did not leave him the inherit the huge amount of money he mistakenly thought his father had.  Marx self serving and full of himself and a proper diagnoses could easily be assigned to this narcissistic sycophant who was a mediocre little dweeb and why anyone would give credence to his writings seems unbelievable&#8230;like keeping Mein Kamp near by for reference!   A pompous lazy eternal student who thought himself of superior intellect!  Not!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5371444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5371444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is what Marx had to say bout bourgeois socialism as well. The person who wrote the article should read it as well and comment. Marx never supported this form of socialism either.


&quot;A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society.

To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind. This form of socialism has, moreover, been worked out into complete systems.

We may cite Proudhon’s Philosophie de la Misère as an example of this form.

The Socialistic bourgeois want all the advantages of modern social conditions without the struggles and dangers necessarily resulting therefrom. They desire the existing state of society, minus its revolutionary and disintegrating elements. They wish for a bourgeoisie without a proletariat. The bourgeoisie naturally conceives the world in which it is supreme to be the best; and bourgeois Socialism develops this comfortable conception into various more or less complete systems. In requiring the proletariat to carry out such a system, and thereby to march straightway into the social New Jerusalem, it but requires in reality, that the proletariat should remain within the bounds of existing society, but should cast away all its hateful ideas concerning the bourgeoisie.

A second, and more practical, but less systematic, form of this Socialism sought to depreciate every revolutionary movement in the eyes of the working class by showing that no mere political reform, but only a change in the material conditions of existence, in economical relations, could be of any advantage to them. By changes in the material conditions of existence, this form of Socialism, however, by no means understands abolition of the bourgeois relations of production, an abolition that can be affected only by a revolution, but administrative reforms, based on the continued existence of these relations; reforms, therefore, that in no respect affect the relations between capital and labour, but, at the best, lessen the cost, and simplify the administrative work, of bourgeois government.

Bourgeois Socialism attains adequate expression when, and only when, it becomes a mere figure of speech.

Free trade: for the benefit of the working class. Protective duties: for the benefit of the working class. Prison Reform: for the benefit of the working class. This is the last word and the only seriously meant word of bourgeois socialism.

It is summed up in the phrase: the bourgeois is a bourgeois — for the benefit of the working class.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what Marx had to say bout bourgeois socialism as well. The person who wrote the article should read it as well and comment. Marx never supported this form of socialism either.</p>
<p>&#8220;A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society.</p>
<p>To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind. This form of socialism has, moreover, been worked out into complete systems.</p>
<p>We may cite Proudhon’s Philosophie de la Misère as an example of this form.</p>
<p>The Socialistic bourgeois want all the advantages of modern social conditions without the struggles and dangers necessarily resulting therefrom. They desire the existing state of society, minus its revolutionary and disintegrating elements. They wish for a bourgeoisie without a proletariat. The bourgeoisie naturally conceives the world in which it is supreme to be the best; and bourgeois Socialism develops this comfortable conception into various more or less complete systems. In requiring the proletariat to carry out such a system, and thereby to march straightway into the social New Jerusalem, it but requires in reality, that the proletariat should remain within the bounds of existing society, but should cast away all its hateful ideas concerning the bourgeoisie.</p>
<p>A second, and more practical, but less systematic, form of this Socialism sought to depreciate every revolutionary movement in the eyes of the working class by showing that no mere political reform, but only a change in the material conditions of existence, in economical relations, could be of any advantage to them. By changes in the material conditions of existence, this form of Socialism, however, by no means understands abolition of the bourgeois relations of production, an abolition that can be affected only by a revolution, but administrative reforms, based on the continued existence of these relations; reforms, therefore, that in no respect affect the relations between capital and labour, but, at the best, lessen the cost, and simplify the administrative work, of bourgeois government.</p>
<p>Bourgeois Socialism attains adequate expression when, and only when, it becomes a mere figure of speech.</p>
<p>Free trade: for the benefit of the working class. Protective duties: for the benefit of the working class. Prison Reform: for the benefit of the working class. This is the last word and the only seriously meant word of bourgeois socialism.</p>
<p>It is summed up in the phrase: the bourgeois is a bourgeois — for the benefit of the working class.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5371440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5371440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what marx had to say about politicians like Obama. Read before you criticise. This is the section on petty bourgeois socialism in the communist manifesto.


&quot;The feudal aristocracy was not the only class that was ruined by the bourgeoisie, not the only class whose conditions of existence pined and perished in the atmosphere of modern bourgeois society. The medieval burgesses and the small peasant proprietors were the precursors of the modern bourgeoisie. In those countries which are but little developed, industrially and commercially, these two classes still vegetate side by side with the rising bourgeoisie.

In countries where modern civilisation has become fully developed, a new class of petty bourgeois has been formed, fluctuating between proletariat and bourgeoisie, and ever renewing itself as a supplementary part of bourgeois society. The individual members of this class, however, are being constantly hurled down into the proletariat by the action of competition, and, as modern industry develops, they even see the moment approaching when they will completely disappear as an independent section of modern society, to be replaced in manufactures, agriculture and commerce, by overlookers, bailiffs and shopmen.

In countries like France, where the peasants constitute far more than half of the population, it was natural that writers who sided with the proletariat against the bourgeoisie should use, in their criticism of the bourgeois régime, the standard of the peasant and petty bourgeois, and from the standpoint of these intermediate classes, should take up the cudgels for the working class. Thus arose petty-bourgeois Socialism. Sismondi was the head of this school, not only in France but also in England.

This school of Socialism dissected with great acuteness the contradictions in the conditions of modern production. It laid bare the hypocritical apologies of economists. It proved, incontrovertibly, the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour; the concentration of capital and land in a few hands; overproduction and crises; it pointed out the inevitable ruin of the petty bourgeois and peasant, the misery of the proletariat, the anarchy in production, the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth, the industrial war of extermination between nations, the dissolution of old moral bonds, of the old family relations, of the old nationalities.

In its positive aims, however, this form of Socialism aspires either to restoring the old means of production and of exchange, and with them the old property relations, and the old society, or to cramping the modern means of production and of exchange within the framework of the old property relations that have been, and were bound to be, exploded by those means. In either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian.

Its last words are: corporate guilds for manufacture; patriarchal relations in agriculture.

Ultimately, when stubborn historical facts had dispersed all intoxicating effects of self-deception, this form of Socialism ended in a miserable fit of the blues.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what marx had to say about politicians like Obama. Read before you criticise. This is the section on petty bourgeois socialism in the communist manifesto.</p>
<p>&#8220;The feudal aristocracy was not the only class that was ruined by the bourgeoisie, not the only class whose conditions of existence pined and perished in the atmosphere of modern bourgeois society. The medieval burgesses and the small peasant proprietors were the precursors of the modern bourgeoisie. In those countries which are but little developed, industrially and commercially, these two classes still vegetate side by side with the rising bourgeoisie.</p>
<p>In countries where modern civilisation has become fully developed, a new class of petty bourgeois has been formed, fluctuating between proletariat and bourgeoisie, and ever renewing itself as a supplementary part of bourgeois society. The individual members of this class, however, are being constantly hurled down into the proletariat by the action of competition, and, as modern industry develops, they even see the moment approaching when they will completely disappear as an independent section of modern society, to be replaced in manufactures, agriculture and commerce, by overlookers, bailiffs and shopmen.</p>
<p>In countries like France, where the peasants constitute far more than half of the population, it was natural that writers who sided with the proletariat against the bourgeoisie should use, in their criticism of the bourgeois régime, the standard of the peasant and petty bourgeois, and from the standpoint of these intermediate classes, should take up the cudgels for the working class. Thus arose petty-bourgeois Socialism. Sismondi was the head of this school, not only in France but also in England.</p>
<p>This school of Socialism dissected with great acuteness the contradictions in the conditions of modern production. It laid bare the hypocritical apologies of economists. It proved, incontrovertibly, the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour; the concentration of capital and land in a few hands; overproduction and crises; it pointed out the inevitable ruin of the petty bourgeois and peasant, the misery of the proletariat, the anarchy in production, the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth, the industrial war of extermination between nations, the dissolution of old moral bonds, of the old family relations, of the old nationalities.</p>
<p>In its positive aims, however, this form of Socialism aspires either to restoring the old means of production and of exchange, and with them the old property relations, and the old society, or to cramping the modern means of production and of exchange within the framework of the old property relations that have been, and were bound to be, exploded by those means. In either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian.</p>
<p>Its last words are: corporate guilds for manufacture; patriarchal relations in agriculture.</p>
<p>Ultimately, when stubborn historical facts had dispersed all intoxicating effects of self-deception, this form of Socialism ended in a miserable fit of the blues.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5371437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5371437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of these comments are dumb and so is the article. You people should read the communist manifesto before you speak rubbish. Marx has no links with the democrats. He mocked people like Obama and called them petty bourgeois socialists. Read the section in the communist manifesto about the petty bourgeois socialists and see if you can&#039;t identify Obama. Marx never believed in welfare he only challenged the evils associated with private property. He saw the good capitalism could do but also the bad. Marx never believed in idleness. Please read before you come and judge and speculate. Marx has nothing to do with Obama. Don&#039;t be fooled Obama believes in capitalism or he would not sanction the bail out of the auto companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of these comments are dumb and so is the article. You people should read the communist manifesto before you speak rubbish. Marx has no links with the democrats. He mocked people like Obama and called them petty bourgeois socialists. Read the section in the communist manifesto about the petty bourgeois socialists and see if you can&#8217;t identify Obama. Marx never believed in welfare he only challenged the evils associated with private property. He saw the good capitalism could do but also the bad. Marx never believed in idleness. Please read before you come and judge and speculate. Marx has nothing to do with Obama. Don&#8217;t be fooled Obama believes in capitalism or he would not sanction the bail out of the auto companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy_Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5370455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy_Cam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5370455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grazie!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grazie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamaguje</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5369452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bamaguje]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5369452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...many American workers would have freedom&quot; - Chuck Schumer.

In other words working to earn a living is slavery. Who then should generate the wealth required to fund welfare programs on which the idle parasites depend?
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats who glorify parasitic idleness would do well to listen to Henry Ford and Voltaire:

“...work is the salvation of the race, morally, physically, socially [and economically]. Work does more than get us our living; it gets us our life&quot; - Henry Ford I.

 “Work spares us from three evils: boredom, vice and need” - Voltaire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;many American workers would have freedom&#8221; &#8211; Chuck Schumer.</p>
<p>In other words working to earn a living is slavery. Who then should generate the wealth required to fund welfare programs on which the idle parasites depend?<br />
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats who glorify parasitic idleness would do well to listen to Henry Ford and Voltaire:</p>
<p>“&#8230;work is the salvation of the race, morally, physically, socially [and economically]. Work does more than get us our living; it gets us our life&#8221; &#8211; Henry Ford I.</p>
<p> “Work spares us from three evils: boredom, vice and need” &#8211; Voltaire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lalalandish</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5369321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lalalandish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5369321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice rebuttal. Five stars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice rebuttal. Five stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frodo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5369239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frodo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5369239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And no one dies under other models?  By that standard, there are no viable systems at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And no one dies under other models?  By that standard, there are no viable systems at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanna</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5369139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lanna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5369139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millions of people die under Marxism and Communism...they lie to gain control, and then destroy free nations, as well as peace and prosperity!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of people die under Marxism and Communism&#8230;they lie to gain control, and then destroy free nations, as well as peace and prosperity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuasweet</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5368958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshuasweet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5368958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[try this one out: 
Democratic Socialists of America and is the largest socialist
organization in the United States and principle U.S. affiliate of the
Socialist International. All are Democrats.
Notable Past Member:  Barack Hussein Obama
look up the list of their current and past members in government ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try this one out:<br />
Democratic Socialists of America and is the largest socialist<br />
organization in the United States and principle U.S. affiliate of the<br />
Socialist International. All are Democrats.<br />
Notable Past Member:  Barack Hussein Obama<br />
look up the list of their current and past members in government </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty_Clinger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5368937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty_Clinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5368937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl Marx was wrong about human nature first and foremost, and wrong about economics as a corollary. Where did you come by the irrational and somewhat funny notion that anyone approved by Marx was also wrong as a result of his approval?


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl Marx was wrong about human nature first and foremost, and wrong about economics as a corollary. Where did you come by the irrational and somewhat funny notion that anyone approved by Marx was also wrong as a result of his approval?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visitor</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5368879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[visitor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5368879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys are so funny. Marx sent a copy of Capital to Darwin (there&#039;s no proof that Darwin ever read it) because he liked to think that he had done for political economy what Darwin had done for natural science. This must prove that Darwin&#039;s theory of the origin of species is wrong. Moreover, Marx appears to have believed the earth revolved around the sun and not the other way around, proof that we must repudiate Copernicus. And he read Shakespeare to his daughters, so we should refrain from reading the Bard of Avon. This is really laughable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are so funny. Marx sent a copy of Capital to Darwin (there&#8217;s no proof that Darwin ever read it) because he liked to think that he had done for political economy what Darwin had done for natural science. This must prove that Darwin&#8217;s theory of the origin of species is wrong. Moreover, Marx appears to have believed the earth revolved around the sun and not the other way around, proof that we must repudiate Copernicus. And he read Shakespeare to his daughters, so we should refrain from reading the Bard of Avon. This is really laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDLakeshore</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5368699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SDLakeshore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5368699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kind of hypocritical of Marx to write so much about working people when he worked so little himself and died sitting on his duff and in abject poverty.  But then, this seems to be what the democrat libs really want for the rest of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of hypocritical of Marx to write so much about working people when he worked so little himself and died sitting on his duff and in abject poverty.  But then, this seems to be what the democrat libs really want for the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty_Clinger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jack-kerwick/the-democratic-party-and-karl-marx/comment-page-1/#comment-5368239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty_Clinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=218752#comment-5368239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wrong, Fascist Crony Capitalism is an exploitation of labor, as is the case with Marxism, the former using law to thrust up a hyper-wealthy business class at the expense of the ordinary worker and business owner by suppressing business competition, while the latter uses law to thrust up a hyper-wealthy governing class at the expense of the ordinary worker and business owner via excessive and self-serving government collectivization of the product of their labor.

Marxists use law to re-define the meaning of the word marriage in violation of the law of nature and nature&#039;s God. Heterosexual Americans don&#039;t care what homosexuals do in private, but they don&#039;t want a neo-Marxist government forcing them to do business with homosexuals when it violates their heterosexual religious principles, like forcing a heterosexually religious photographer to take pictures at a homosexual wedding against his will. Heterosexual Americans will accept the natural equal right of homosexuals to associate in a legal union with property and visitation rights etc., which are equivalent to heterosexual marriage, but not an unnatural re-definition of marriage.

Since both Fascism (Crony Capitalism) and Marxism use government power excessively in the interest of a few (themselves), both are &quot;Left&quot; on the scale of government power over the individual - Marxist Left and Fascist Left.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw




“Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation’s economy. The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of control. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property – so long as the state reserves to its self the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property. If “ownership” means the right to determine the use and disposal of material goods, then Nazism endowed the state with every real prerogative of ownership. What the individual retained was merely a formal deed… which conferred no rights on its holder. Under Communism, there is collective ownership of property de jure. Under Nazism, there is the same collective ownership de facto.”  Leonard Peikoff

http://www.peikoff.com/lr/chapter1.htm

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, Fascist Crony Capitalism is an exploitation of labor, as is the case with Marxism, the former using law to thrust up a hyper-wealthy business class at the expense of the ordinary worker and business owner by suppressing business competition, while the latter uses law to thrust up a hyper-wealthy governing class at the expense of the ordinary worker and business owner via excessive and self-serving government collectivization of the product of their labor.</p>
<p>Marxists use law to re-define the meaning of the word marriage in violation of the law of nature and nature&#8217;s God. Heterosexual Americans don&#8217;t care what homosexuals do in private, but they don&#8217;t want a neo-Marxist government forcing them to do business with homosexuals when it violates their heterosexual religious principles, like forcing a heterosexually religious photographer to take pictures at a homosexual wedding against his will. Heterosexual Americans will accept the natural equal right of homosexuals to associate in a legal union with property and visitation rights etc., which are equivalent to heterosexual marriage, but not an unnatural re-definition of marriage.</p>
<p>Since both Fascism (Crony Capitalism) and Marxism use government power excessively in the interest of a few (themselves), both are &#8220;Left&#8221; on the scale of government power over the individual &#8211; Marxist Left and Fascist Left.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw</a></p>
<p>“Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation’s economy. The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of control. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property – so long as the state reserves to its self the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property. If “ownership” means the right to determine the use and disposal of material goods, then Nazism endowed the state with every real prerogative of ownership. What the individual retained was merely a formal deed… which conferred no rights on its holder. Under Communism, there is collective ownership of property de jure. Under Nazism, there is the same collective ownership de facto.”  Leonard Peikoff</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peikoff.com/lr/chapter1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.peikoff.com/lr/chapter1.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 689/716 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 22:23:27 by W3 Total Cache -->