The Left Versus the Realities of Race

katieIn almost every instance of the so-called “knock out game,” perpetrators have been black and their victims mostly white (and/or) Asian. There is one—and only one—case in which the racial dynamics of this violence reversed course, an incident from Texas involving a white predator and a black prey.  Not unsurprisingly, this is the only instance of “the game” that Barack Obama’s Department of Justice is choosing to pursue as a “hate crime.”

And it is the one and only incident regarding which Katie Couric unreservedly disclosed the respective races of the perpetrator and victim on her daily television show.  As for the phenomenon generally, Couric was careful to convey the impression that it was racially-neutral, an activity in which “kids” of all races routinely engaged.

Couric’s take was all too predictable.

It is also a lie, a lie of omission, for like that of all of her colleagues in the left-leaning media, it is painfully clear that Couric’s objective is to manipulate the public into thinking that this phenomenon is something that it isn’t.

In reality, though, Couric is simply doing with this racial issue what leftists have been doing with the issue of race for a long, long time.

Consider slavery, the lynchpin of the narrative underwriting racial politics in America.

To know only the conventional account of slavery is to know worse than nothing. It is to know next to nothing—just enough truth, however miniscule, to make one think that one knows the whole truth.

According to the conventional narrative, whites originally kidnapped blacks from some idyllic African paradise for the sake of reducing them to a lifetime of servitude in America.

In other words, only white Americans were slave masters and only blacks were slaves.

In reality, slavery is an institution that is as old, and as universal, as humanity itself.  People of all races have both enslaved and been enslaved.  Tellingly, the word “slave” derives from the experience of the Slavish, an Eastern European—i.e. white—ethnic group whose members were enslaved en masse by North African Muslims for a period of nearly two centuries.

Those poor souls who were made to endure the unfathomable evils of the notorious “Middle Passage” were sold by other black Africans, slave traders who were doing nothing other than engaging in one of Africa’s oldest, and most lucrative, practices.  To this day, long after Europeans employed their economic and military might to force, not just Africans, but other “people of color” in Asia and the Middle East, to abolish this abominable industry, slavery continues in parts of “the Dark continent.”

The reader may also be unaware of the fact that in early America, the sight of white slaves—not indentured servants, but slaves—was not an uncommon one at the slave ports. And in the antebellum South, as late as 1860, there were as many as three thousand black slave masters.

Another inconvenient tidbit that the ideologically approved tale of slavery omits is that, long before whites discovered the New World, slavery had been ubiquitous among the indigenous peoples of what would become the Americas.

So, while whites most certainly did participate in slavery, to know only this is to know next to nothing, for it suggests that there is something uniquely wicked about whites. But if there is anything at all unique about whites with respect to this issue it is that whites—and white English Christians to boot!—were the first (and only) people in all of human history to spearhead a moral revolt against this perennial trade in human bondage.  As Thomas Sowell and others have long documented, during the apex of the British Empire, the English deployed their immense power, against considerable resistance on the part of Africans and others, to stamp out slavery throughout the world.

Just the slightest acquaintance with real history brings into focus a dramatically different picture of slavery than that advanced by the politically useful racial fiction of opportunists and activists.

Similarly, a dramatically distorted picture of “the knock out game” emerges after Katie Couric and company have left the reality on their editing room floors.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Cancelled Czech

    Great article, however, one mistake crept in. The name of Slavonic nations is derived from their expression for a “word” ..”slovo”: SLOVO also means a “language” in its archaic form. In Russian the language/ethnic group is called SLAVIANYE. In Czech: SLOVANÉ. SLAVNYI means “famous”. SLOVUTNÝ means “esteemed”. Slavonic tribes started flowing into central Europe around the 4th century AD. They were capable of SLOVO, called themselves SLAVI, SLAVYANI… When they met germanic, frankic, keltic tribes, they called them “NIEMCI (NIEMCY) or “mutes”, because for a Slavonic ear (SLAVIANSKOYE UCHO) their language did not make sense (němý = mute).

    • ConcernedCitizen999

      Thanks. I did not know that. I’ve often thought that the beauty of the Ukrainian language was a too well kept secret in the West.

    • rxpc

      That is very interesting since very few of us here in the USA know much about the Slavic languages. But the author said that the word slave derived from Slavic, not that Slavic derived from slave. Nevertheless, I think its wonderful that a peoples’ name means famous or esteemed. Noble naming, indeed.

      • Cancelled Czech

        Slavery was well established in Europe before the Slavs started arriving. In the Roman empire the Latin word for a slave was “servus” (evolved into English “serf”). Slavs became rounded up and sold into slavery much later, during the Ottoman Turkish conquest.

  • Sheik Yerbouti

    Slavery has nothing to do with the assaults happening today. These random assaults are the product of pure racism. That’s what targeting people by race for attacks is called. Couric is not someone who has ever had any real credibility.

    • Drakken

      The more the blacks continue to assault whites and others, the more likely there will be a considerable backlash against them, and no body is going to give a bloody rip how innocent they are.

      • Sheik Yerbouti

        But, they’re all innocent now!

      • guest

        I wish we could avoid it. The left is determined to see this come pass (Cloward-Piven, OWS,black block, NOI, …).

        I married a Han woman. I could see some whites ignoring her as she is not the problem. But I also could see some whites figuring one minority is good as another.

        If it comes to pass I will blame them and do what needs to be done. But I will mainly blame the Left and do what needs to be done.

        Everything the Left preaches is outright crap or they care about some of the same things all others care about and go about in the wrong way from affirmative action to mutli-culturalism

  • emptorpreempted

    I’ve never heard of there being white slaves in America, and I’m inclined to doubt their existence. I just can’t believe that the sight of them would have been tolerated by any English or Spanish or French or Dutch settlers or their respective governments, at any time. The closest thing I can think of is impressment in the navy; the next closest is the kidnapping of women for prostitution; but neither example seems to be what the author had in mind.

    • Paul of Alexandria
      • emptorpreempted

        I don’t trust the people who write that stuff for one moment. I want to see one reputable academic historian who writes about actual, legally-sanctioned slavery, slavery as an institution, as opposed to indentured servitude, criminal sentencing, and cases of illegal human trafficking that are bound to occur in wild and ill-policed regions of the world..

        • Sheik Yerbouti

          Or else what? Decide that only blacks were ever enslaved in the US? Plenty of us are treated like corporate slaves NOW, so why is it such a stretch?

        • Tabitha Bliss

          Check out the link I left you..That book uses tons of historical documentation & provides extremely accurate info – (numbers, dates, etc.) that were documented

    • Tabitha Bliss
    • kikorikid

      “The closest thing I can think of…”
      No wonder you are short of information.
      Answer this: How many hundreds of English slaves
      died in the silver mines of Potosi? OH wait a minute
      you didn’t think of that. “Those who know how to read
      and don’t are no better off than those who can’t.”

  • dagesh

    There were white slaves in colonial America. Look it up. A somple:

    • A Z

      I knew of the white indentured servants, but not of white slaves. I am not a know nothing but damn I got hit hard.

      • Tabitha Bliss

        There’s a book called; “White Cargo” that gets really in depth about the Irish slave trade in the west.. I would recommend it to anyone who would like to learn some (largely unknown) & stunning history..

        Here’s it’s an article / description / (review?) about it;

        They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.

        Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.

        We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? We know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade.

        But, are we talking about African slavery? King James II and Charles I also led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.

        The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

        Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

        From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

        During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

        Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

        As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

        African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

        In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

        England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.

        There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on it’s own to end it’s participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

        But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.

        Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.

        But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?

        Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer?

        Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.

        None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.

        • pupsncats

          Tabitha: This part of historical reality was suppressed by the Protestant majority because it is a condemnation on their barbaric treatment of Irish Catholics. The English hatred of Catholics after England took up the heresies of Protestantism, was transferred to the New World where Catholics were persecuted and treated as the unborn are treated now, not human.

          Your posting of this historical atrocity won’t be exposed anywhere or anytime now as history taught is only that which the political left allows.

          • laura r

            this needs to be exposed. frontpage mag should write an artical. someone should write a book for the masses. the time is NOW.

          • guest

            The treatment was bad in the 19th century.

            Bad enough that many Irish defected to the Mexicans during the Mexican American war.

            That fact came out with the election of Mexican President Vicente Fox.

            Regardless of what society as a whole did it just unprofessional what some Protestant officers did.

        • Johnnie the Jew

          Great article which turns the often one sided, nauseating ly leftarded history of slavery against whites. But never, ever mention the history of African slavery to a muslime. No “apology” will ever be forthcoming. In the meantime the deluded dhimmified drongos of the left will continue to have us apologise for the wests part and dare not mention the subject to their muslime buddies. I want a film produced about the muslime initiated African slave trade. Brave person whoever that film director will be !!

      • A Z

        To Tabitha Bliss

        I am posting to my post because the administrators of the moderating software do not like certain words.

        “There’s a book called; “White Cargo” that gets really in depth about the Irish slave trade in the west.. I would recommend it to anyone who would like to learn some (largely unknown) & stunning history..

        Here’s it’s an article / description / (review?) about it;


        With somewhat better historical document than those in much of Africa ( I am of course not referring to the Sahel state like Timbuctoo), there could be a white “Roots” movie.

        I am surprised on many accounts. First of all did not James the II being King of Scotland have Scottish and thus Irish blood. Ir after several hundred years did they forget? Second of all I had a good education, but i still think I got shafted when it came to the truth on this. It was whitewashed with euphemisms like indentured servants. Some were. It seems many were not.

    • ebonystone

      There were also American Indians who were slaves. Many Indian nations practiced slavery. And after European settlement began, some of the more powerful tribes in what would be the American mid-South made a nice living capturing people from less powerful tribes and selling them as slaves in the Carolinas.

  • Race_Dissident

    During the mid- and late 16th century, the Krim Tatars (an Asiatic people) enslaved literally millions of white Russians. And, of course, Russian serfs up until 1861, endured life conditions that were not significantly better than black slaves in the New World.

  • A Z

    We all have internet and can submit video to news programs or run the news programs. Most of us have cell phones capable of streaming or vidcams.

    We do not need ABC, CBS or NBC with their baggage like Katie Couric. Her wit and life read like everything we hatred about cliquish people in highschool.

    Myself, I am about one step away from ditching cable/satellite and going solely with Hulu and internet TV.

    That would make the Katie Couric similar to a haughty noble in the Middle Ages whose income stream has dried up. Can she learn new tricks? She is too old to turn tricks. Maybe she can pull a Steinem, but with her track record it is doubtful.

    We need to film these incidents. We cannot film the m all, but large one like at the state fairs happen frequently enough that we should be prepared.

    • laura r

      there is a book w/500 recorded blk on wht crimes, blk flash mobs. it vids interact w/your smart phone: “white girl bleed alot” by colin flaherty. these vids are also on his websight. check it out.

      • A Z

        I am aware of it. In a nation of 300+ million and over a period of a few years, liberals will argue these are anecdotal.

        The FBI crime stats showing a large disparity on balck on white crime versus white on black crime does not seem to phsse others

        The MSM, liberal pundits and others need to be pummeled with this news. The MSM needs to go broke. With PJ Media running their TV shows on the internet , FPM doing likewise, and many others this might be the beginning of the end for the MSM.

        Rush Limbaugh has said that if the MSM had been doing their job objectively, he wouldn’t exist as a national host with so many viewers. He might have still,been successful maybe a manner similar to Paul Harvey or as a DJ and then a radio exec, but he would be the national pundit that he is today.

        • laura r

          i read MSNBC lost 50% of thier viewers. almost same w/CNN. what is going on w/fox? as for colin flahertly, he is keeping on top of this. always on the radio. he should do book #2. crime may escalate more than it is now, maybe double or triple, & the riots may get worse. there may come a tipping point where it wont be anecdotal. (??)

  • veeper

    american blacks are the most hate filled group of people on the planet….

    their hatred runs deeper than muslims…..

    if they could get away with muslim type killings in america…..

    that’s exactly what they would be doing…..

    • ytdontplay

      What would you expect from “crackbabies”?

      • 11bravo

        You go away too! Troll.

    • 11bravo

      Go away troll!

      • laura r

        he dosnt mean all blacks. he means the gang ghetto thugs & those who agree w/them.

    • Max

      They are now.

  • nomoretraitors

    “In reality, slavery is an institution that is as old, and as universal, as humanity itself”
    “long before whites discovered the New World, slavery had been ubiquitous among the indigenous peoples of what would become the Americas”
    Same things I’ve been saying all along

    • A Z

      Cabeca de Vaca and compatriots were enslaved by Indian on the Texas coast just because they could and because they were lazy.

  • nomoretraitors

    The left has just enough information to make them dangerous

  • Todd Jackson

    Black people! We have to learn that we are individual selves, with the full complement of responsibilities due to any individual. We are not just discrete units of Blackness. That my great-great grandfather was born a slave does not mean that I was born a slave. Ralph Ellison spent his whole adult life trying to convey this. He wasn’t heard – or rather, seen.

    • Max

      Good point. A key concept toward self-actualization; don’t wait around to be handed “empowerment”; empower yourself.

    • fiddler

      Please, someone like you run for president! My lamentation of the 2008 is that Barack Obama didn’t run against a conservative black. I know that such are anathema to the leftist press because they want to monopolize a voting block. Little to they know the insult they do to independent-minded Americans. Their assumption is that all blacks think alike and vote alike, so it is just a matter of having as many to the polling place as possible to take full advantage of the 90+% majority for one party. When oh when will Blacks stop subordinating their largely conservative values to consistently go along with the loudly trumpeted mantra of the left. How much longer do they want to believe what the Left is selling (really selling them out)?

  • Todd Jackson

    “There is one—and only one—case in which the racial dynamics of this violence reversed course, an incident from Texas involving a white predator and a black prey. Not unsurprisingly, this is the only instance of “the game” that Barack Obama’s Department of Justice is choosing to pursue as a “hate crime.””

    White people! You have a legitimate civil rights issue. Your rights are being violated. You aren’t used to being in this position, and many will dream doomsday scenarios. Instead, fight for your rights. The Constitution is on your side.

    And if you didn’t own slaves, you are not guilty of slavery. There are no “racial crimes.”

    • laura r

      UN fortunatly most americans thrive on “guilt”. the media & schools tell them so. they obey. basically its a big ego trip. if one is “guilty” for slavery then one is a very important person! now you are an audomatic “player” in the world. you shaped history, you had power. you held a whip! wow. now you can patronize the little folks you abused. you can pat them on the head, you can feel sorry for them. because of this mindset i wonder how many white people will fight for their rights? or will they follow the “guilt fashion”?

      • Max

        It seems to me that this racial guilt, at least among weak-willed whites serves as a catharsis; that is, the sensation of guilt itself substitutes for actually doing anything to ameliorate the perceived wrongs, a sort of self-flagellation of the psyche.

        • kikorikid

          “perceived wrongs” is correct. Nobody now alive
          has suffered under slavery nor prospered as
          a slaver. Why even worry about a percieved
          wrong? It is ONLY actual wrongs that can/may
          be mitigated. Percieved wrongs are in the same catagory
          as Shariah blaspheme,that is, Evil is in the eye of
          the beholder and have no more of a substantive
          foundation the rest of PC propaganda.

        • laura r

          i dont think they connect w/the wrongs, its not real guilt. i think its a social network mentality. “think this” “say this” “do this” “feel this”- now you are socially accepted! (people are more mindless than you can imagine).

    • Jacobite2

      The ’64 and ’65 Civil Rights Acts explicitly made whites second-class citizens. That was why Barry Goldwater and National Review (for two) opposed them. The first phase of white subjugation was the era of affirmative action and racial set-asides. The next phase looks like it will be exemption of blacks from legal punishment. The knock-out game is only a beginning.

      • kikorikid

        Eric Holder has said that if there are Civil Rights violations,
        and the victim is White, he(DOJ) will NOT enforce the Law.
        To date there have been six fatalities of the “Knockout Game”.
        Both Obama and Holder operate as lawless, no-constraint,
        individuals. Legal or not, arm yourself.

  • rusyn

    there is no eastern european “slavish” group. what the author is probably referencing is the term “slav” which is an indo-european group which incorporates, among others, russians.

  • DB1954

    English speaking slaveholders were among the last of western, “white nations” that allowed slavery. The Portuguese were in the trade long before Englishmen and for a much longer period of time.

  • Consider

    There is no excuse for slavery in the US, the land of the brave and of the free, where the following truths are (and were) held to be self-evident, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”.
    Slavery in the Sahel, ancient Rome or Persia cannot justify the existence of slavery until 1865 in one of the most advanced (or maybe not so advanced) countries in the world, a century into the Enlightement and half of a millenium after the Renaissance.
    A even less are there excuses for the glorification of the slaveowners’ party in popular media starting from the ‘Birth of a nation’, through ‘Gone with the wind” to many contemporary sequels, where they (the slaveowners and their supporters) are invarriably portrayed as noble firghters for a just case whose only fault was that they have lost the war, to bruttal, greedy and primitive people

    • fiddler

      Who says there is any “excuse” for slavery ANYWHERE? What is being said (or perhaps you missed it) is such things as 3,000 non-white owners of slaves; that white people weren’t exclusively slave owners. Balance anyone? Ever heard of the Abolitionists? That’s right, this issue was rightly addressed before. Yes, yes, yes, the Civil War was largely if not mostly about economics — we get that. No one set out really to fight the war to free enslaved Blacks, but the Abolitionists made the war inevitable. Many lives were lost from the most bloody war in US History. Just dismiss the dead if you will. BTW do you see people lauding “Birth of a Nation” anymore? Uh no.

    • fiddler

      One more thing. Greed is an age-old human condition. Left unchecked by our better angels (dare I say a Judeo-Christian ethic?) it can run rampant. Greed has many faces, one example is power-mad judges who have left their dispassionate post to become blatant usurpers of the democratic process. First “suspend” a law that the electorate passes — wait until the election is over, then “rule” the law unconstitutional, ostensibly appearing objective and unbiased in the process. This is another face of greed — a sense of being better because you possess a jurist doctor and “honor” bestowed by the state in order to wield your gavel in activism.

    • Stephen108260

      “Men”, meant white men. The founders were very clear that they did not include InJuns or Negro’s in that definition. They all wrote about exporting the primitives to reservations or back to Africa.

      And it did not even mean all white men were to be considered equal in talents or intellectual capacity, it just meant equality before they law you idiot.

      America has always been a white country founded by white guys for white people. Naturalization act of 1790, Get a clue.

  • justquitnow

    “Consider slavery, the lynchpin of the narrative underwriting racial politics in America.”

    No, let’s consider your fantasies about what other people may or may not believe about slavery in America.

    “So, while whites most certainly did participate in slavery, to know only this is to know next to nothing, for it suggests that there is something uniquely wicked about whites.”

    Yeah, because when I think about slavery IN THE UNITED STATES…I think about how white people got a bad name.

    • 95Theses

      What an amazing point-by-point refutation of Kerwick’s argument and premises! I have GOT to write that down! … (crumple it up and throw it away).

    • fiddler

      And boy the power that brings. Race hustlers NURSE racism (read whites having a “bad name”) because, in fact, they need it. Any “reverends” out there preaching forgiveness? Nope? Oh no, that was been superseded by the “liberation theology”. I guess even the Bible teaching has to be “modernized”, right?

      • laura r

        the white anti whites are the worst offenders.

      • justquitnow

        Sure….why not dude. Just think of them hating you and the hate you have doesn’t seem so unreasonable.

  • Jdcsa usayy

    Accolades, to the author, Jack Kerwick, who has the courage to write frankly and honestly about how the race issue is exploited by liberals.
    Another interesting fact that is never mentioned is that 90% of Black slaves were purchased on the coast from Black tribal chieftains selling their own people to white slavers. Yah that is right– 90%. Of course the liberals and self hating, guilt stricken Whites will try to evade or deny this FACT.
    Look at what is being promoted in the US today: White people who never owned slaves are supposed to apologize for the slavery they never participated in. And Blacks who never were slaves are claiming to be victims of that slavery.
    I am tired of 50 years plus, of incessant vilification of European American who are condemned forever, their children, and their children’s children and their children’s, children’s children — forever. Even after hater crime laws that are almost exclusively used against Whites and “affirmative action” that is, in fact, anti White discrimination in employer hiring, still we are told about a phantom “institutionalized racism” against Blacks. discrimination has not ended in the USA, it is only that the race of the people being discriminated against has changed from Black to White.
    An anti white racism is being promoted in large part by guilt stricken whites who think they are really being noble by beating up on other Whites for the benefit of Blacks.

  • flyboy48-49

    Couric and other slave hustlers are pathetic. Having lived and worked over 20 years in North Africa and the Middle East, I can confirm that slavery is alive and well. Just a little more nuanced perhaps, but going strong.

  • Stephen108260

    I believe it’s clear in light of 21st Century Science that America made a grave mistake in allowing the negro citizenship and voting rights. This is not the 1950’s where we once compiled our opinions and biases based of those things that we saw as self evident.

    We now KNOW as FACT, genetically and biologically, that in truth white people of the past we’re correct in their suspicions that something was just not right about Negro’s. The facts are in: The world is not flat, electricity is not witchcraft, and Negro’s are not white people just with a different skin tone.

    The Negro is a savage and violent species with an extremely low IQ and in light of the reality of truth it’s extremely inappropriate that we allow them to walk our streets unleashed and/or unattended?