<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Witness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-witness</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5359045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5359045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, what do you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shannon oakley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will check it out. Just bookmarked it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will check it out. Just bookmarked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks.  I hope to see your comments on the matter in due course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I hope to see your comments on the matter in due course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shannon oakley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is probably the most articulate comment I have ever read in a political forum. Though I disagree with you, on how this country can once again rise to the top, your views have given me reason to review my own -- thus I will not at this time, give my take on how we can reattain our position as the world leader, economically.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably the most articulate comment I have ever read in a political forum. Though I disagree with you, on how this country can once again rise to the top, your views have given me reason to review my own &#8212; thus I will not at this time, give my take on how we can reattain our position as the world leader, economically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nhóm Đào Tạo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nhóm Đào Tạo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ot finding the magic, handy-dandy, one-size-fits-all ideology. Those 
still locked in ideological manacles are projecting their own dogmatism,
 and lack of clarity, when they accuse Mr

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abay.vn/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ve may bay&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abay.vn/ve-may-bay-theo-loai/ve-may-bay-gia-re&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ve may bay gia re&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abay.vn/ve-may-bay-theo-loai/gia-ve-may-bay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gia ve may bay&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ot finding the magic, handy-dandy, one-size-fits-all ideology. Those<br />
still locked in ideological manacles are projecting their own dogmatism,<br />
 and lack of clarity, when they accuse Mr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abay.vn/" rel="nofollow">ve may bay</a><br />
<a href="http://www.abay.vn/ve-may-bay-theo-loai/ve-may-bay-gia-re" rel="nofollow">ve may bay gia re</a><br />
<a href="http://www.abay.vn/ve-may-bay-theo-loai/gia-ve-may-bay" rel="nofollow">Gia ve may bay</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Horowitz and Hitchens are similar in many ways, but I think it is fair to say that neither made the complete transition to conservatism which at the end of the day is not about attacking Communists or Democrats, but rather nourishing and supporting the great American economic miracle.  Unfortunately, there are very few recent examples of that in recent history by politicians on either side of the aisle.  Instead what we have seen is an almost wholesale “rush to the exits” by American industry and the unprecedented shift to deficit-spending in order to finance the huge cash needs of the American economy.   


The closest thing to an authentic American conservatism since Barry Goldwater was the team of Ronald Reagan and Milton Friedman but they clearly failed to stem the tide of deindustrialization and deficit-financing, and the dual tragedy of that catastrophic philosophy was worse during the last ten years than at anytime in American history.  What did Hitchens have to say about it?  Virtually nothing.  What about Horowitz?  The same. 


It’s a dismal tale, and the chickens will soon be coming home to roost unless we are prepared to make radical changes to re-industrialize America and attract new industry and new high-paying jobs.   Unfortunately, no politician on either side of the aisle is talking about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horowitz and Hitchens are similar in many ways, but I think it is fair to say that neither made the complete transition to conservatism which at the end of the day is not about attacking Communists or Democrats, but rather nourishing and supporting the great American economic miracle.  Unfortunately, there are very few recent examples of that in recent history by politicians on either side of the aisle.  Instead what we have seen is an almost wholesale “rush to the exits” by American industry and the unprecedented shift to deficit-spending in order to finance the huge cash needs of the American economy.   </p>
<p>The closest thing to an authentic American conservatism since Barry Goldwater was the team of Ronald Reagan and Milton Friedman but they clearly failed to stem the tide of deindustrialization and deficit-financing, and the dual tragedy of that catastrophic philosophy was worse during the last ten years than at anytime in American history.  What did Hitchens have to say about it?  Virtually nothing.  What about Horowitz?  The same. </p>
<p>It’s a dismal tale, and the chickens will soon be coming home to roost unless we are prepared to make radical changes to re-industrialize America and attract new industry and new high-paying jobs.   Unfortunately, no politician on either side of the aisle is talking about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shannon oakley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trotskyist to be precise, Hitchens was a Trotskyist. Never was he a neo-con, he only supported the invasion of Iraq, He did so because of his hatred of fundamental Islam, and of the tyrant Saddam. He advocated preemptive strikes against theocratic nations he saw as threatening secular freedom. I will concede to your point of me perhaps mistaking style over substance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trotskyist to be precise, Hitchens was a Trotskyist. Never was he a neo-con, he only supported the invasion of Iraq, He did so because of his hatred of fundamental Islam, and of the tyrant Saddam. He advocated preemptive strikes against theocratic nations he saw as threatening secular freedom. I will concede to your point of me perhaps mistaking style over substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shannon oakley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never would I have correlated Camus and Goldwater. Camus having abandoned Communism when witnessing the brutality of Stalinism -- thus the break between him and Sartre. I do see as you claim, the shared abhorrence both men had for the nihilism prevalent in the 20th century]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never would I have correlated Camus and Goldwater. Camus having abandoned Communism when witnessing the brutality of Stalinism &#8212; thus the break between him and Sartre. I do see as you claim, the shared abhorrence both men had for the nihilism prevalent in the 20th century</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shannon oakley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather hostile reply TB. We&#039;ve not even met via comment forums, yet you make an unkind remark with nothing to go by. Please, be patient, you may soon have reason to make such an accusation with what you consider proof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather hostile reply TB. We&#8217;ve not even met via comment forums, yet you make an unkind remark with nothing to go by. Please, be patient, you may soon have reason to make such an accusation with what you consider proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shannon oakley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is a good book. I have it in my library. I read it last, about 15-years ago. Thanks for recalling it for me. It is perhaps time to reread it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is a good book. I have it in my library. I read it last, about 15-years ago. Thanks for recalling it for me. It is perhaps time to reread it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB: &quot;You couldn&#039;t spot the mark if it was painted on your nose and you were surrounded by mirrors.”


My hunch is that you may well have a significant level of expertise in the area of looking in mirrors and seeing painted noses.  Thanks for sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB: &#8220;You couldn&#8217;t spot the mark if it was painted on your nose and you were surrounded by mirrors.”</p>
<p>My hunch is that you may well have a significant level of expertise in the area of looking in mirrors and seeing painted noses.  Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;You are a self-righteous fool and live in a delusion of moral superiority. The repetitive use of the various forms of the word &quot;delusion&quot; was in the hope that you will do some of your own self-examination and recognize that you are a rigid ideologue,and that isn&#039;t a good thing.”


There is nothing delusional about the moral doctrines of truth and love as found in the teachings of Jesus Christ, and from my point of view, they form the very essence of what it means to be an Authentic American Conservative.   


David Horowitz talks a lot about truth, but he doesn’t talk very much about love.  And neither do you.  Which is why I am more than happy to direct to look in the mirror and try to take the plank out of your own eye.  Then maybe you will see clearly enough to take out the splinter in my eye.  Thus far, you’ve completely missed the mark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;You are a self-righteous fool and live in a delusion of moral superiority. The repetitive use of the various forms of the word &#8220;delusion&#8221; was in the hope that you will do some of your own self-examination and recognize that you are a rigid ideologue,and that isn&#8217;t a good thing.”</p>
<p>There is nothing delusional about the moral doctrines of truth and love as found in the teachings of Jesus Christ, and from my point of view, they form the very essence of what it means to be an Authentic American Conservative.   </p>
<p>David Horowitz talks a lot about truth, but he doesn’t talk very much about love.  And neither do you.  Which is why I am more than happy to direct to look in the mirror and try to take the plank out of your own eye.  Then maybe you will see clearly enough to take out the splinter in my eye.  Thus far, you’ve completely missed the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  You deny his redemption and falsely judge him, with no factual or moral justification, just your delusional and ill-considered opinion. 


&quot;I am not aware that David Horowitz claims to be “redeemed” in any sense of the word.  He saw the light and departed the Leftist ideologues of his youth, and now represents one of their most knowledgeable opponents.  I commend him for that, and I applaud him for that.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  You deny his redemption and falsely judge him, with no factual or moral justification, just your delusional and ill-considered opinion. </p>
<p>&#8220;I am not aware that David Horowitz claims to be “redeemed” in any sense of the word.  He saw the light and departed the Leftist ideologues of his youth, and now represents one of their most knowledgeable opponents.  I commend him for that, and I applaud him for that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;The same goes for your formulaic, idiotic attacks on Horowitz. The closest you get to a polemic is innuendo, self-righteous posturing, and blathering about your conspicuously undefined &quot;Authentic All-America Conservative&quot; which is nothing more than your incoherent, contradictory definition of conservatism.  You claim to be a Christian, but won&#039;t forgive Horowitz for criticizing your idol, Diana West.”



It is obvious that David Horowitz was sucked into a disingenuous and ungentlemanly attack on Diana West by Ron Radosh, and he should apologize.  Horowitz didn’t sin against me, so I have nothing to forgive him for.  If he is any sort of gentleman, he will apologize.  Personally, I like David Horowitz, and I sincerely appreciate his work in exposing the Communist Left in America.  But I am not the only one who thinks he falls short of becoming an authentic American conservative.  He probably doesn’t even think of himself in that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;The same goes for your formulaic, idiotic attacks on Horowitz. The closest you get to a polemic is innuendo, self-righteous posturing, and blathering about your conspicuously undefined &#8220;Authentic All-America Conservative&#8221; which is nothing more than your incoherent, contradictory definition of conservatism.  You claim to be a Christian, but won&#8217;t forgive Horowitz for criticizing your idol, Diana West.”</p>
<p>It is obvious that David Horowitz was sucked into a disingenuous and ungentlemanly attack on Diana West by Ron Radosh, and he should apologize.  Horowitz didn’t sin against me, so I have nothing to forgive him for.  If he is any sort of gentleman, he will apologize.  Personally, I like David Horowitz, and I sincerely appreciate his work in exposing the Communist Left in America.  But I am not the only one who thinks he falls short of becoming an authentic American conservative.  He probably doesn’t even think of himself in that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;You always attack Limbaugh but can&#039;t intelligently articulate what it is that you dislike about him.”



What I don’t like about him is that he’s an attack dog who’s in politics to entertain and make a buck, but could care less about finding real solutions to the severe problems facing the American people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;You always attack Limbaugh but can&#8217;t intelligently articulate what it is that you dislike about him.”</p>
<p>What I don’t like about him is that he’s an attack dog who’s in politics to entertain and make a buck, but could care less about finding real solutions to the severe problems facing the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;You, who once made the brilliant claim that Barry Goldwater and Albert Camus were somehow compatible. Of course, you&#039;ve never read Camus, or at least nothing that you understood.”


I’ve read Camus and I’ve read Goldwater, and I find in both an incredibly strong dislike of the inhuman nihilistic spirit of the Twentieth Century.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;You, who once made the brilliant claim that Barry Goldwater and Albert Camus were somehow compatible. Of course, you&#8217;ve never read Camus, or at least nothing that you understood.”</p>
<p>I’ve read Camus and I’ve read Goldwater, and I find in both an incredibly strong dislike of the inhuman nihilistic spirit of the Twentieth Century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hogwash. I suspect that you are an anti-semite projecting your bigotry onto Horowitz.


Why shouldn&#039;t Jewish people have &quot;Jewish interests?&quot; They are Jewish, duh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hogwash. I suspect that you are an anti-semite projecting your bigotry onto Horowitz.</p>
<p>Why shouldn&#8217;t Jewish people have &#8220;Jewish interests?&#8221; They are Jewish, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitchens was very bright and a great writer, if a bit ostentatious. If he was truly a great thinker, however, he would have rejected Marxism, in its entirety, much sooner, but at least he finally did.


You are mistaking style over substance. Hitchens abandoned Marxism and somewhat embraced neo-conservatism before he died. He was quite conflicted on a lot of things, but always very eloquently. It seems to me that Horowitz is more thoroughly grounded in his thinking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens was very bright and a great writer, if a bit ostentatious. If he was truly a great thinker, however, he would have rejected Marxism, in its entirety, much sooner, but at least he finally did.</p>
<p>You are mistaking style over substance. Hitchens abandoned Marxism and somewhat embraced neo-conservatism before he died. He was quite conflicted on a lot of things, but always very eloquently. It seems to me that Horowitz is more thoroughly grounded in his thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You couldn&#039;t spot the mark if it was painted on your nose and you were surrounded by mirrors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You couldn&#8217;t spot the mark if it was painted on your nose and you were surrounded by mirrors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jay-nordlinger/a-witness/comment-page-1/#comment-5350640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=216652#comment-5350640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Limbaugh is an &quot;idiot and a buffoon&quot; but you know everything. You, who once made the brilliant claim that Barry Goldwater and Albert Camus were somehow compatible. Of course, you&#039;ve never read Camus, or at least nothing that you understood.


You always attack Limbaugh but can&#039;t intelligently articulate what it is that you dislike about him. I suspect that is in part because you want to keep your own radical political beliefs hidden, probably because you have been beaten too many times trying to ham-handedly defend them, and partly because you aren&#039;t up to the intellectual task of taking Limbaugh down. 


The same goes for your formulaic, idiotic attacks on Horowitz. The closest you get to a polemic is innuendo, self-righteous posturing, and blathering about your conspicuously undefined &quot;Authentic All-America Conservative&quot; which is nothing more than your incoherent, contradictory definition of conservatism.  


You claim to be a Christian, but won&#039;t forgive Horowitz for criticizing your idol, Diana West.  You refuse to acknowledge the innate honesty and integrity in the examination of conscience that led to his rejection of Marxism. You deny his redemption and falsely judge him, with no factual or moral justification, just your delusional and ill-considered opinion. You are a self-righteous fool and live in a delusion of moral superiority. 
The repetitive use of the various forms of the word &quot;delusion&quot; was in the hope that you will do some of your own self-examination and recognize that you are a rigid ideologue,and that isn&#039;t a good thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Limbaugh is an &#8220;idiot and a buffoon&#8221; but you know everything. You, who once made the brilliant claim that Barry Goldwater and Albert Camus were somehow compatible. Of course, you&#8217;ve never read Camus, or at least nothing that you understood.</p>
<p>You always attack Limbaugh but can&#8217;t intelligently articulate what it is that you dislike about him. I suspect that is in part because you want to keep your own radical political beliefs hidden, probably because you have been beaten too many times trying to ham-handedly defend them, and partly because you aren&#8217;t up to the intellectual task of taking Limbaugh down. </p>
<p>The same goes for your formulaic, idiotic attacks on Horowitz. The closest you get to a polemic is innuendo, self-righteous posturing, and blathering about your conspicuously undefined &#8220;Authentic All-America Conservative&#8221; which is nothing more than your incoherent, contradictory definition of conservatism.  </p>
<p>You claim to be a Christian, but won&#8217;t forgive Horowitz for criticizing your idol, Diana West.  You refuse to acknowledge the innate honesty and integrity in the examination of conscience that led to his rejection of Marxism. You deny his redemption and falsely judge him, with no factual or moral justification, just your delusional and ill-considered opinion. You are a self-righteous fool and live in a delusion of moral superiority.<br />
The repetitive use of the various forms of the word &#8220;delusion&#8221; was in the hope that you will do some of your own self-examination and recognize that you are a rigid ideologue,and that isn&#8217;t a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 789/846 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 23:39:19 by W3 Total Cache -->