A Professor’s Left Illusions

Danusha_GoskaRecently I was contacted by Dr. Danusha Goska – a writer and professor in New Jersey, the author of the novel Save Send Delete, and a former leftist. “I am a teacher,” she introduced herself to me. “I see what my former comrades on the left have done to young minds.” She shared with me her excellent American Thinker articles “Ten Reasons Why I Am No Longer a Leftist,” “Coming Out as Pro-Israel on Facebook,” and “Islam, Postmodernism, and Political Correctness,” which prompted me to ask if she would be willing to share some of her political revelations and thoughts with FrontPage Mag.

Mark Tapson: Professor Goska, you wrote that you decided to leave the left when you decided that, instead of hating, you “wanted to spend time with people building, cultivating, and establishing, something that they loved.” Can you elaborate on that?

Danusha Goska: When I was a grad student, I was stricken with a crippling illness, a vestibular disorder, for which there is little proven treatment. I spent whole days functionally paralyzed and unable to stop vomiting.

My social world then was utterly left-wing: former Peace Corps volunteers, university students and professors, artists and writers. A subset of my left-wing friends repeatedly hammered into me how much they hated America on my behalf. “Oh, I hate America because we don’t have socialized medicine. Oh, I hate America because there’s so much capitalist pollution and that’s probably why you are sick.”

I can’t tell you how freakishly weird these interactions were. I used to want to shout at people: “Why do you think that telling me how much you hate America is helping me? It’s not helping me. Please do something positive. I have an illness that makes me vomit and paralyzes me and I can’t go to the grocery store. I could use some seltzer water. Am I asking too much?”

And they could not do that small thing – bring a friend who can’t stop puking some seltzer water. But they could rage against the Catholic Church for – what – not selling Vatican artwork and funding my surgery.

I am still friends with some of these folks. They are still banging the same drum: how imperialistic America is. How hypocritical Christianity is. How life-destroying capitalism is. They never talk about doing anything positive for anyone because I don’t think they ever do. Their entire political and ethical stance consists of loudly denigrating capitalism, Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian tradition. Islamic gender apartheid, systematic abortion of female fetuses in China, India’s caste system that reduces over a hundred million human beings to the status of pariah dogs: none of these ever receive a peep of criticism.

It is my unscientific impression that devout Christians and Jews, including secular Jews, are the people most likely to be consciously and regularly doing something concrete, however small, to make the world a better place. I stumbled across a Facebook meme about a 99-year-old Iowa seamstress who creates one dress every day for children in Africa. I immediately thought, “She’s got to be a Christian.” I googled the story and discovered that she sews for a Christian charity.

“If not me, who? If not now, when?” are words that many of my Jewish acquaintances live by, whether they know Rabbi Hillel or not. This includes secular Jews, who, in my own unscientific, subjective experience, are disproportionately represented among those who do concrete things, however small, to make the world a better place.

MT: You mentioned to me that, as a teacher, you see what your former comrades on the left have done to young minds. What have they done?

DG: Two years ago, one of my students said, “I wish we had been taught to feel proud of something. To feel part of something. To love our country and to feel that we were part of some big thing, like they did back during World War Two. I guess that kind of patriotism, of being part of something, is just not popular anymore.”

Mind: I did not steer the conversation this way at all. This yearning was voiced, spontaneously, by my student. And there’s more: this student is a Muslim. This young, Muslim-American student was hungering to be encouraged to esteem her own country, and American teachers denied her that.

Students are taught about America’s failures. That’s a good thing. I’m glad I teach my students about Jim Crow. Context is everything. Two months after graduating from college, my first job was teaching in a remote village in Africa. I discovered that Arabs have an ongoing slave trade in Africa. This one fact rocked my world. I had been led to believe that the Atlantic Slave Trade was the alpha and omega of slavery, and that if only we could wrest control from these inherently oppressive white males we’d be one step closer to Utopia.

“Where there is no vision the people perish.” There is a hole in young people that can be filled only by transcendent ideals. Those ideals should be formed in response to neutral facts, not ideological indoctrination. Vulnerable young minds should be cherished, not exploited as recruits.

I am a teacher, not a minister or counselor. I don’t try to sell students on any one point of view. I do try to introduce them to the tools and methods of inquiry: peer review scholarship, the formation of research questions, the testing of hypotheses, investigating alternative points of view.

There are too many professors who don’t do that. There are too many professors who use the power they have – the power of grades, yes, but also the power of funding, humiliation, intimidation, flattery and inclusion into the in-crowd – to pressure students to adopt a given point of view as the route to success. That point of view is all too often a nihilistic, scorched earth cynicism that, as mentioned above, tears down but builds nothing to replace the targets of its destruction, and that encourages academic elites to assume an unearned status as above the common man.

MT: You’ve written that we must overcome the stultifying effects of political correctness, and that “free speech is the best friend Muslims have.” What do you mean by that?

DG: First, thank you for asking me this. This matter is very urgent and close to my heart. I grew up, and currently live, in Passaic County, New Jersey, which is said to have the second largest Muslim population in the U.S. I grew up with Arabs and with Muslims. I have had Muslim friends, boyfriends, bosses, coworkers, and students. I love many Muslims. I feel for them the kind of love you feel for any close friend. When I was a girl, one day a Muslim friend turned to me and said, “When the time for jihad comes, if you don’t accept Islam, I will have to kill you.”

The simple truth is that Islam is different from the other world belief systems: Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism. None of these includes anything like the call to jihad. Islam does. No, most Muslims are not active jihadis, but a critical mass are, and we cannot predict which Muslim will become an active jihadi. We need free speech about jihad in order to solve the dilemma we all face: peaceful integration of existing Muslim populations into American life, a rational foreign policy, and our own security. We need this free speech from professionals for whom speech is their sharpest tool: journalists, political, military and religious leaders, academics, and creative artists.

Right now we are not hearing free speech. Rather, we hear dogma fashioned to forfend free speech. This dogma is so predictable we could all chant its creed in unison: “Islam means peace. Not all Muslims are terrorists. The Bible contains shocking verses. Christians do bad things.” We recently heard Ben Affleck and Nick Kristof mouthing these Orwellian bromides on the October 3 episode of Real Time with Bill Maher. In the absence of the free flow of ideas, the average Joe, who is not as stupid or as docile as the Ben Afflecks and Nick Kristofs of the world think he is, is becoming fearful and concluding that our culture is not addressing jihad. Many average Joes are deciding that they are free agents, and must go it alone. You can see it in internet discussions. People – nice people, average people – are talking about what kind of ammunition they are stockpiling.

What is better for Muslims in the U.S.? A frank conversation about our best response to jihad, or our cultural leaders mouthing bromides that demonize free inquiry, while millions of average people plan to be vigilantes? Can we please have the conversation we need to have about, say radical mosques and how petro-dependency steers public policy before we start shooting innocent people? If Americans felt that they could openly express their fears about jihad and receive honest and informed replies, if they felt that their leaders had their best interests at heart and were addressing radical mosques, petro-dependency and the threat of free agent jihadis, I don’t think as many people would be talking about stockpiling ammo.

I think of one Muslim man I know. He is a mechanic. He interacts with Americans all day long. He is liked and respected by his customers. He’s an older guy who has lived in this country most of his life. He sacrificed much to leave his Muslim-majority homeland and come here to enjoy the fruits of democracy. I think the chances of his ever hurting anyone are near zero. He has expressed to me his hatred and rejection of terrorism. I think this man would be totally open to America having a frank conversation about addressing extremism in our country. But we are afraid to have that conversation. I think my Muslim friend believes more in American ideals like free speech than someone like Ben Affleck. I think the Ben Afflecks of the world fail my Muslim friends.

MT: Tell us about your novel Save, Send, Delete, a debate between a Catholic and an atheist. What’s the philosophical thrust of that debate, and why was it important enough to you to write a book about it?

DG: Save Send Delete is a true story. Several years back I was wrestling with the big, hard questions: Is there a God? Why is there suffering? I saw an atheist on TV and I sent him an email. To my great surprise, he wrote back. We corresponded for a year, debating the existence of God, and we fell in love.

Save Send Delete isn’t a left-wing book or a right-wing book. It’s about confronting God and love and trying to dig down as deeply as possible for worthy, livable truth. But even if I were not a believing Christian, I would shudder at the message of “capital A” Atheists. Recently Salon made waves by publishing Jeffrey Tayler’s criticism of Islam. Here’s the thing – Jeffrey Tayler is a proselytizer who exploits discomfort with Islam to peddle capital A Atheist tracts. “If you don’t like suicide bombings you should agree with me that all religion is evil,” is his main idea. Religion, he says, is like pestilence-spreading rats in the sewer. We must eradicate it. This has long been the thinking of mass murderers from the French Terror to the Khmer Rouge.

Capital A Atheists use their “Flying Spaghetti Monster” concept to sell total relativism. All religions are the same; Mother Teresa is just as bad as Osama bin Laden. We may as well believe in a Flying Spaghetti Monster as in anything else. This extreme relativism is deadly. Our inability to differentiate between cultures is comparable to being unable to differentiate between nourishment and poison.

Save Send Delete makes the case not only for faith, but for civilization, in the face of the absolute relativism, the scorched earth, of the capital A Atheist Flying Spaghetti Monster mentality. In it I write about being a teacher who communicates to her students that Western Civilization, for all its flaws, is worth it.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Patriot077

    Wonderful interview. I shall have to read other articles by this teacher with whom I wish all our children were able to develop their potential.

  • roger

    “When I was a girl, one day a Muslim friend turned to me and said, “When the time for jihad comes, if you don’t accept Islam, I will have to kill you.”
    And there you have it.

    • YouAreAVictim2

      In 1983, when I started work in Northern Nigeria as a teacher in a University, a colleague I shared the University Guest House with while discussing the problem between Nigeria and Cameroon, told me a similar thing that should a religious upheaval start he would not spare me. He stated he did not care about the trouble between the two nations but would become interested if it became a religious one between Muslims and others. It is now over 30 years and it still remains in my subconscious mind.

      • Sheik Yerbouti

        I wonder what the reaction would be if a non-muslim reacted to such a threat. Someone telling me they intend to kill me feels like a threat. So what’s to stop me from jumping on them and ensuring they cannot kill me immediately after they deliver this casual threat.

        I think we let them get away with so much crap, they feel we’re waiting to be slaughtered. It has skewed their reality.

    • sandraleesmith46

      What you have there, is the difference between Islam and other religious beliefs around the world, as this lady pointed out. I also have studied those she named and others as well; this concept is found ONLY in Islam! Others may kill you just as dead, indeed, but not merely for that reason. Unfortunately, the necessary dialogue will not happen, so long as leftist leadership is enamored of MB groups here like CAIR, ISNA, ISMA, NAIT, Holy Land Foundation, MSA, etc, ad nauseum, which are stealth jihadi groups here using our own laws as weapons by which to conquer us! While courting those leaders they are destroying the very foundations of our culture with assistance from our own governments and courts!

    • tagalog

      Why do we take such remarks seriously and not the remarks of doctrinaire leftists who tell us that come the revolution, you and I will be disposed of in order to make way for the New World? I mean, the leftists have actually murdered tens of millions of infidels during the past century.

    • Yossi

      Reminds me of something that a Jewish Israeli tour bus driver shared when I was on a tour there in 1986. He had been a young boy in 1948, and lived in a city in Galilee (I forget which one… might have been Tsfat or Nazareth) where both Jews and Arabs lived, and their kids freely interacted and played together. As war approached, one of his Arab playmates told him “when the war comes, we are going to kill you all like dogs.” He also related overhearing his formerly friendly Arab neighbors working out who would get whose house and wife after the Jews were killed.

    • ebonystone

      The proper reply: “Not if I kill you first.”

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

    I don’t mind atheists putting down all religions as long as they (like Sam Harris) can say the Islam is the worst by far.

    It was Sam’s statement–”Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas”–that made Affleck’s face turn ashen in horror. What Harris did is violate the cardinal rule of relativism. He made a moral judgment specifically tailored to Islam. He signaled out Islam. We can debate Plato versus Moses. But Mohammad didn’t debate; he conquered, ruled and oppressed. Islam must be fought.

    • Michael Durham

      Ben Affleck is a complete and utter Dhimwit.

  • iluvisrael

    The part about her friends being to busy hating to get her some seltzer reminds me of the song from HAIR – “easy to be hard” “Do you only care about the bleeding crowd? How about a needing friend. I need a friend.”

  • Liatris Spicata

    This is the most meaningful statement I have read on the ‘Net this year. I am grateful for Danousha’s life and work and for Mark for bringing it to my attention.

  • joe kulak

    Great article.

  • stage9

    “How hypocritical Christianity is.”

    Yeah cuz heathenism isn’t hypocritical.

    • Patriot077

      There is no self awareness with the lefties! No realities either.

  • Scar

    Great interview. Dr. Goska is living, breathing proof that leftism is a disorder that is not incurable. Think I’ll pick up a copy of Save Send Delete.

  • stage9

    “Their entire political and ethical stance consists of loudly denigrating capitalism, Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian tradition.”

    Which further proves my theory that marxist-leninists only know how to collapse the system, but have nothing of equal or greater value to replace it with.

    • Patriot077

      Yes, she actually makes the statement that they “tear down but build nothing to replace the target of their destruction”.
      This interview captured so many of my heartfelt positions and ideas! I think I will buy her book. I may not agree on every point, but she is very articulate in expressing her logic and reasoning.

  • stage9

    “We need free speech about jihad in order to solve the dilemma we all face: peaceful integration of existing Muslim populations into American life, a rational foreign policy, and our own security.”

    There is NO SUCH THING. The two cannot exist in the same space and she was told as mcuh:

    “When the time for jihad comes, if you don’t accept Islam, I will have to kill you.”

    • Patriot077

      Agreed. But there must be a conversation about it before our free speech has gone up in the flames of stealth jihad. At this point, everyone is afraid to speak any truth.

      • stage9

        The conversation needs to happen independent of islamists. This is an American problem that needs to be taken care of “within the family” as it were. Poisonous islamist influence is why we’re not talking about it. They’ve convinced members of the crime syndicate that their ideology represents peace even as their islamofriends lop off heads of Western Journalists in Iraq.

        • Patriot077

          I agree that the infiltration of the poisonous islamist influence has stopped conversation; also the left’s hatred of Christianity has turned too many away from God and they have no eyes to see or ears that hear the truth.
          It will be up to Christians and Jews to be the leaders to fix this as they have done in the past when terrible injustices have needed correction. And it won’t be easy. They have spent the past 60 years tearing down our institutions and building their own networks.

          • stage9

            I keep thinking of that scene in LOTR where Wormtongue has poisoned the mind of the King Theoden. He had become so paralyzed by Wormtongue’s verbal poison, that he was useless in the government of his own kingdom.

            Sometimes you need to isolate yourself from the poisonous words of bad counselors to right the ship. Islamists and marxist-leninists are that poison.

          • Patriot077

            And this is why our system of government public ed is so effectively destroying our kids and their futures … along with our own. Wormtongues galore!

  • stage9

    “Islam means peace. Not all Muslims are terrorists. The Bible contains shocking verses. Christians do bad things.”

    Christians don’t do bad things. Liberals CLAIM Christians do bad things and than that meme is perpetuated as fact by the dullard masses.

    • Patriot077

      She is repeating the dogma she hears and pointing out what is really true; Islam is the only “religion” that requires hate and vengeance. No other.

  • stage9

    “Can we please have the conversation we need to have about, say radical mosques and how petro-dependency steers public policy before we start shooting innocent people?”

    no one is going to shoot “innocent people”; they are going to be forced to shoot threats to their homeland and to their families. Why? because the federal crime syndicate refuses to do its fundamental job of securing our nation against all enemies foreign and domestic.

  • stage9

    “If Americans felt that they could openly express their fears about jihad..”

    I’m not afraid of jihad. I’m afraid of a federal crime syndicate whose mission appears to be to undermine our sovereign values, naively (or intentionally) and who refuse to do the job of securing our country against imminent threats, be that Ebola, Mexican interlopers or foreign and domestic terrorists.

  • stage9

    “Jeffrey Tayler is a proselytizer who exploits discomfort with Islam to peddle capital A Atheist tracts. “If you don’t like suicide bombings you should agree with me that all religion is evil,” is his main idea. Religion, he says, is like pestilence-spreading rats in the sewer. We must eradicate it. This has long been the thinking of mass murderers from the French Terror to the Khmer Rouge.”

    Agreed, and this coming from a group of people (Atheists) who still, to this day, hold the record for murder, so much so that a word had to be invented to describe the level of atrocities atheist governments inflicted on its citizens in the 20th century alone — democide.

  • stage9

    “Our inability to differentiate between cultures is comparable to being unable to differentiate between nourishment and poison.”

    And this is the crux of it all. The very heart of the threat that faces us in Western civilization. liberal correctness will be the end of America. America will not die in a fury of bullets, but with a whimper as a result of the marxist-leninist ideological poison coursing through her veins.

    A great man once warned the West of this impending doom.

    “We look back upon history, and what do we see? Empires rising and falling, revolutions and counterrevolutions, wealth accumulated and wealth disbursed. Shakespeare has written of the rise and fall of great ones, that ebb and flow with the moon.

    I look back upon my own fellow countrymen (Great Britain), once upon a time dominating a quarter of the world, most of them convinced, in the words of what is still a popular song, that ‘the God who made them mighty, shall make them mightier yet.’

    I’ve heard a crazed, cracked Austrian (Hitler) announce to the world the establishment of a Reich that would last a thousand years. I have seen an Italian clown (Mussolini) say he was going to stop and restart the calendar with his own ascension to power. I’ve heard a murderous Georgian brigand in the Kremlin (Stalin), acclaimed by the intellectual elite of the world as being wiser than Solomon, more humane than Marcus Aurelius, more enlightened than Ashoka.

    I have seen America wealthier and, in terms of military weaponry, more powerful than the rest of the world put together–so that had the American people so desired, they could have outdone a Caesar, or an Alexander in the range and scale of their conquests.

    All in one lifetime, all in one lifetime, all gone. Gone with the wind.

    England, now part of a tiny island off the coast of Europe, threatened with dismemberment and even bankruptcy. Hitler and Mussolini dead, remembered only in infamy. Stalin a forbidden name in the regime he helped found and dominate for some three decades. America haunted by fears of running out of those precious fluids that keeps their motorways roaring, and the smog settling, with troubled memories of a disastrous campaign in Vietnam, and the victories of the Don Quixotes of the media as they charged the windmills of Watergate.

    All in one lifetime, all in one lifetime, all gone. Gone with the wind.

    Behind the debris of these solemn supermen, and self-styled imperial diplomatists, there stands the gigantic figure of one, because of whom, by whom, in whom and through whom alone, mankind may still have peace: the person of Jesus Christ.

    I present him as the way, the truth, and the life.” — Malcolm Muggeridge

  • nimbii

    Thank you.

    • zoomie

      precisely, many elites in germany thought hitler would be useful

      • nimbii

        Bet they wish they’d had that one back again!

  • Pepe Turcon

    This is the reason Barack Obama says: “America is no longer a Christian Nation!” Mr. Obama has become our “Muslim Cheerleader.”

  • Fed Up

    “I think the chances of his ever hurting anyone are near zero. He has expressed to me his hatred and rejection of terrorism. I think this man would be totally open to America having a frank conversation about addressing extremism in our country.”

    Right, until he is surrounded in his neighborhood by that “critical mass” of muslims who have the full weight of all of islams history, texts, jurisprudence and social convention behind them and he no leg to stand on save his willingness to forsake it all in favor of infidel society. That is not a convincing argument to his more zealous brethren because all of their supports say he is an apostate condemned to death and that they do allahs will if they bring it about.

    That is precisely what her friend meant when he said, “When the time for jihad comes, if you don’t accept Islam, I will have to kill you.” What time would that be? Well, once a given area reaches that “critical mass”, meaning numbers of muslims, and they feel they have the upper hand. Notice, he didn’t say if but when and so he knows, even if we don’t, that future time to come is inevitable wherever islam and sharia reign and that simply means wherever muslims do.

    Muslims carry islam in their hearts in a way most all other faiths do not. It is a hermetically sealed totalitarianism of the kind the Soviets could only dream of imposing. And so wherever muslims go so goes islam and once enough are in a place, voila!, you have neighborhoods around Europe’s best cities where the adhan blares, women go about covered and the men on the street are the voluntary enforcers of sharia. Western infidels go there at their peril, even the authorities, and very-modern women of the west had better not go there at all.

    Our multi-culturalists think we have only accommodated a few social conventions when in fact we have ceded territory to islam. The muslims know it even if we do not and so despite all our blather about rights and freedom our western ideals cease at islams borders, both abroad and at home.

    We had better wake up to the threat islam poses us and begin to answer some tough questions. How long do tolerate the intolerable? Or the intolerant? At what point does preserving our ideals mean refusing to allow those who’d destroy them to manipulate them to their advantage? I say that time is coming closer, very close and a few more acts of RAJ (Random Acts of Jihad) will be all we need to know the truth about islam in our midst.

  • DaveGinOly

    As a “little a” atheist, I must object to her characterization of the purpose of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Although she correctly notes the use to which the “capital A” atheists use HNH (His Noodly Holiness), this is not the point of the FSM.

    If atheists are correct and there is no god (or gods), then all religions are false. If people are willing to believe in the falsehood of god, then they’re willing to believe in similar nonsense based upon their religious beliefs, like “jihad.” It’s not that religion doesn’t have positive aspects, or that it’s incapable of doing good (it is), it’s that it depends on uncritical gullibility to believe what is taught or preached (sometimes to the point of a belief in something that is demonstrably untrue), and sometimes people believe in something simply because so many other people believe it, with no real foundation in fact. (For instance, this is what qualifies anthropogenic global warming as a religion – there is no foundationi n fact, but people believe it both because it’s being taught and because so many other believe it too. Critical thinking has been replaced with an almost willful gullibility.) In a way, I’ve described “faith.” Faith is a belief in something for which one has no proof. But believing in something for which there is no proof (like AGW) is usually condemned by enlightened people (this is what the Enlightenment was about – the application of critical thought, scientific method, and logic to questions about life and the nature of existence, among other subjects), except when it comes to religious belief. Atheists reject this exception to critical thought, logic, facts, and lack of proof.

    The purpose of the FSM is to demonstrate, by reductio ad absurdum, that uncritical belief can lead people to believe in things that are obviously nonsense (like the FSM), and to point out the ironic situation in which people put themselves when they reject the story of Mohammed’s ascension into heaven on a winged horse as “fantasy,” while maintaining their own belief in the bodily resurrection of a man who had been crucified to death and his ascension into heaven. (They will object now that with “God,” everything and anything is possible. But that also explains why Mohammed was able to ascend to heaven on a winged horse – something they will insist didn’t happen because it’s “too fanciful,” “absurd,” or simply “nonsense.” They refuse to apply their standard of belief for the religious faiths of others to their own beliefs. As I said, ironic.)

    • dynbrake

      You have an incorrect definition of “faith.” To properly understand what faith is to the Christian, one must understand what the Bible says about faith, rather than use the humanism based definition you gave. For the
      Christian, faith is about assurance and conviction. “Things not seen,” (Hebrews 11:1) does not mean that there is no proof. Is there no proof of the existence of air? Air is unseen, but I am sure that you are convinced that it exists. How? You have seen the effects that other things have upon it, and how other things use it. You breathe it constantly, or you will die.

      “The FSM is not about “total relativism” and the acceptance of all
      religions equally, with disregard for their messages. It is about the
      relativism of uncritical thought (the resurrection of Christ is
      acceptable to Christians, but the ascension of Mohammed to heaven on a winged horse is not, while the FSM is complete nonsense) and it is
      intended to force people to confront the cognitive dissonance they
      employ to reject some religious beliefs while not applying the same
      standards to their own.”

      That may be a “nice” sentiment (or not,) but it is decidedly not true. Atheists (whether “capital A” or not,) regularly use FSM in precisely the very way that you deny it is meant: it is used as an attack upon Christian thought because Christian thought is supposedly inferior to Atheistic thought. This is ridiculous.

      You charge that Christian thought is “uncritical,” but I simply deny that. Christian thought is the most critical thought in existence. It is rational and logical. It is not cognitive dissonance to believe in the resurrection of Christ. That is a charge all too frequently put out by the Atheists who are blind to their own “faith” ( as you define it.)

    • Danusha Diane Goska

      DaveGinOly fwiw I say more about the Flying Spaghetti Monster here:

      http://save-send-delete.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-flying-spaghetti-monster-cutesy-new.html

  • Bobbybestcat

    Thank you. Her book is now added to my amazon wish list.

  • lizwagner2

    This was a great interview. Thank you for sharing Danusha Goska with us. I look forward to reading her linked articles and book.

  • lyndaaquarius

    are there any Muslim hospitals in the U.S.? I know of many Catholic,Jewish,Baptist,Presbyterian,Methodist hospitals,but I haven’t heard of any Muslim hospitals or medical centers.

    • Patriot077

      Kinda like there are no churches in Saudi Arabia. And even the ME countries that previously allowed Christians and Jews to “co-exist” are destroying centuries old churches and synagogues.
      This is very telling, but to the godless they wish all religions to be done away with.
      Some even whine about Christians getting credit for the good and often dangerous work they do in times of critical need, such as treating Ebola patients in foreign lands.