<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demonizing SCOTUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=demonizing-scotus</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: nimbii</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5398063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nimbii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5398063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we sniff the move to request Justice Ginsberg to resign?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we sniff the move to request Justice Ginsberg to resign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If it is a democrat ideal it is never dead.   They will bring it up again and again under other guises.  It took 4 decades of ACA. they 1st floated it in the late 60s or early 70s.   Another is the Fairness doctrine. They keep bring it up under various guises like net neutrality, etc.

If the Devil himself came up with a program and called it &quot;fairness&quot; or &quot;equality&quot;, more than 1/2 of Democrat voters would support it.

Closed shop might be technically dead, but I still had to pay $ to the union so they could negotiate for me.  As a state worker these unions were negotiating with Democrat pols.  They way they did it was with pensions which will bust the state while giving us monthly pay that was substandard.  I would rather have higher monthly pay and fund my own retirement. Politicians and union chiefs have shown themselves actuarially challenged or maybe they are smart enough to understand actuarial science and they are just snake oil salesmen.

I made better money after going to the private sector with no union.

You have a good day and I do meant that honestly and not sarcastically.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is a democrat ideal it is never dead.   They will bring it up again and again under other guises.  It took 4 decades of ACA. they 1st floated it in the late 60s or early 70s.   Another is the Fairness doctrine. They keep bring it up under various guises like net neutrality, etc.</p>
<p>If the Devil himself came up with a program and called it &#8220;fairness&#8221; or &#8220;equality&#8221;, more than 1/2 of Democrat voters would support it.</p>
<p>Closed shop might be technically dead, but I still had to pay $ to the union so they could negotiate for me.  As a state worker these unions were negotiating with Democrat pols.  They way they did it was with pensions which will bust the state while giving us monthly pay that was substandard.  I would rather have higher monthly pay and fund my own retirement. Politicians and union chiefs have shown themselves actuarially challenged or maybe they are smart enough to understand actuarial science and they are just snake oil salesmen.</p>
<p>I made better money after going to the private sector with no union.</p>
<p>You have a good day and I do meant that honestly and not sarcastically.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aemoreira81</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aemoreira81]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The closed shop has been illegal since 1947, and card check does not exist and is for all intents and purposes dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The closed shop has been illegal since 1947, and card check does not exist and is for all intents and purposes dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amongst my first thoughts after Chief Roberts&#039; incredibly facile emanations in the penumbra, ( in the ACA case )  Hmmm, I wonder if that stash of Clinton/Livingstone raw FBI files had been dipped into ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amongst my first thoughts after Chief Roberts&#8217; incredibly facile emanations in the penumbra, ( in the ACA case )  Hmmm, I wonder if that stash of Clinton/Livingstone raw FBI files had been dipped into ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Left never liked his adopted children anyway.

The Left has a very BIGOTED view of Latin America. They do not realize how many people migrated to Latin America from Italy, Holland, Germany and other countries.

When it was found out that Roberts&#039;s children where not olive skinned, browned eye and black haired, they had a hissy fit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left never liked his adopted children anyway.</p>
<p>The Left has a very BIGOTED view of Latin America. They do not realize how many people migrated to Latin America from Italy, Holland, Germany and other countries.</p>
<p>When it was found out that Roberts&#8217;s children where not olive skinned, browned eye and black haired, they had a hissy fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as union are large, force people to pay dues, run closed shops, implement card check (or call for it at the national or state level), then other organizations made up of large groups of people need similar representation though free speech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as union are large, force people to pay dues, run closed shops, implement card check (or call for it at the national or state level), then other organizations made up of large groups of people need similar representation though free speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cxt</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only good thing to some of these vicious attacks is that the Leftist mask slips just a bit.
Whe then Courts vote the way they want--then its a &quot;near sacred&quot; group of people whose rulings are to be treated with the respect and deffernce usually applied to Moses coming down the Mount, tablets in hand.
But when they don&#039;t?---Then the courts are packed with &quot;radical conservatives&quot; whom must be opposed on all fronts.
The Left simply can&#039;t keep having everything both way--and the more they try---the more people see them for who and what they are.
Like insisting the ACA was &quot;settled law&quot; then changing it 30 plus time. ;)
Overall it actually hurts them---they are just to ideologcially driven to see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only good thing to some of these vicious attacks is that the Leftist mask slips just a bit.<br />
Whe then Courts vote the way they want&#8211;then its a &#8220;near sacred&#8221; group of people whose rulings are to be treated with the respect and deffernce usually applied to Moses coming down the Mount, tablets in hand.<br />
But when they don&#8217;t?&#8212;Then the courts are packed with &#8220;radical conservatives&#8221; whom must be opposed on all fronts.<br />
The Left simply can&#8217;t keep having everything both way&#8211;and the more they try&#8212;the more people see them for who and what they are.<br />
Like insisting the ACA was &#8220;settled law&#8221; then changing it 30 plus time. <img src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /><br />
Overall it actually hurts them&#8212;they are just to ideologcially driven to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Spark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clare Spark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than engaging in internal civil wars, I hope that conservatives and &quot;establishment Republicans&quot; bury their differences to unseat the Democrats, who will undoubtedly attempt to pack SCOTUS with &quot;progressives&quot;. See http://clarespark.com/2014/04/05/standing-up-to-bullying-social-democrats/. &quot;Standing up to bullying social democrats.&quot; In part 2 of this essay, I suggest a focus on voting and defeating voter fraud (that the Dems insist is a figment of our imaginations).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than engaging in internal civil wars, I hope that conservatives and &#8220;establishment Republicans&#8221; bury their differences to unseat the Democrats, who will undoubtedly attempt to pack SCOTUS with &#8220;progressives&#8221;. See <a href="http://clarespark.com/2014/04/05/standing-up-to-bullying-social-democrats/" rel="nofollow">http://clarespark.com/2014/04/05/standing-up-to-bullying-social-democrats/</a>. &#8220;Standing up to bullying social democrats.&#8221; In part 2 of this essay, I suggest a focus on voting and defeating voter fraud (that the Dems insist is a figment of our imaginations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiddler</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiddler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We remember BHO during a state of the Union address deliberately deriding the SCOTUS members in attendance, and his speech about the &quot;strong majority&quot; who voted for the ACA while again deriding the SCOTUS. God knows what would have happened if Chief Justice Roberts had not ruled as he did, but probably the predictable &quot;victims&quot; would have screamed extremism and BHO would have been re-elected by a wider margin -- due to the victim vote. Point is, he should have taken a stand. I&#039;m sick of the truth being the ultimate casualty in this debate. The Left plays politics like a fiddle. This administration knows nothing of showing civility but wants to hide behind it whenever needed.


Predictable, predictable, predictable. 


Just remember: It is not about the truth; it&#039;s about WHO WINS! Ban lawyers from being elected! They turn justice on its head!


More people need to yell, &quot;YOU LIE!!&quot; That gets to the heart of the matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We remember BHO during a state of the Union address deliberately deriding the SCOTUS members in attendance, and his speech about the &#8220;strong majority&#8221; who voted for the ACA while again deriding the SCOTUS. God knows what would have happened if Chief Justice Roberts had not ruled as he did, but probably the predictable &#8220;victims&#8221; would have screamed extremism and BHO would have been re-elected by a wider margin &#8212; due to the victim vote. Point is, he should have taken a stand. I&#8217;m sick of the truth being the ultimate casualty in this debate. The Left plays politics like a fiddle. This administration knows nothing of showing civility but wants to hide behind it whenever needed.</p>
<p>Predictable, predictable, predictable. </p>
<p>Just remember: It is not about the truth; it&#8217;s about WHO WINS! Ban lawyers from being elected! They turn justice on its head!</p>
<p>More people need to yell, &#8220;YOU LIE!!&#8221; That gets to the heart of the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DogmaelJones1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DogmaelJones1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s so brazen of the liberal/left/Marxist outfits to
complain about the Citizens United and McCutcheon decisions of SCOTUS that these will unleash
&quot;moneyed interests&quot; and deny Americans the right to express their
support of or voice their opposition to legislation and candidates, when Obama,
Clinton, Reid, et al. are all using &quot;moneyed interests&quot; to advance
their statist, collectivist agendas, through their super PACS and secret PACS
and just plain corruption.  I don’t see
the FEC going after those outfits, just conservative ones. That&#039;s all we hear
about, how evil and conspiratorial the conservatives are, when it&#039;s the left
that&#039;s committing all the sins they&#039;re accusing the &quot;right&quot; of. But,
that&#039;s the Alinsky tactic, too. Shine a light on the enemy, not on yourselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so brazen of the liberal/left/Marxist outfits to<br />
complain about the Citizens United and McCutcheon decisions of SCOTUS that these will unleash<br />
&#8220;moneyed interests&#8221; and deny Americans the right to express their<br />
support of or voice their opposition to legislation and candidates, when Obama,<br />
Clinton, Reid, et al. are all using &#8220;moneyed interests&#8221; to advance<br />
their statist, collectivist agendas, through their super PACS and secret PACS<br />
and just plain corruption.  I don’t see<br />
the FEC going after those outfits, just conservative ones. That&#8217;s all we hear<br />
about, how evil and conspiratorial the conservatives are, when it&#8217;s the left<br />
that&#8217;s committing all the sins they&#8217;re accusing the &#8220;right&#8221; of. But,<br />
that&#8217;s the Alinsky tactic, too. Shine a light on the enemy, not on yourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Roberts was intimidated by criticism in the Obamacare ruling. I do think a credible threat by the Obama regime to take away his adopted children did influence his bizarre decision.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Roberts was intimidated by criticism in the Obamacare ruling. I do think a credible threat by the Obama regime to take away his adopted children did influence his bizarre decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie767</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stephanie767]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Uncle Jacob got a year 2013 Audi TT RS
Coupe by working part time online. imp source C­a­s­h­F­i­g­.­ℂ­o­m]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Uncle Jacob got a year 2013 Audi TT RS<br />
Coupe by working part time online. imp source C­a­s­h­F­i­g­.­ℂ­o­m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Vadum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/demonizing-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-5397506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Vadum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223078#comment-5397506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s get this thread started!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s get this thread started!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 554/565 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 17:16:59 by W3 Total Cache -->