FBI Warns of More Ferguson Rage

ferguson-rioter-tear-gas-APThe FBI is warning that extremist protesters will probably threaten or physically attack police officers or federal agents when a grand jury investigating the death of Michael Brown decides whether to indict the policeman who shot him.

Brown, an 18-year-old black male, was killed in Ferguson, Mo., on Aug. 9 by white police officer Darren Wilson after he beat Wilson and tried to grab his handgun. Brown’s defenders characterize him as a gentle giant even though a few minutes earlier he was captured on video committing a strong-arm robbery at a convenience store, roughing up a much smaller clerk in the process. At autopsy Brown’s height was 6′ 5″ and his weight was 289 lbs. As previously reported, autopsy results were consistent with witness accounts that Brown reached for Wilson’s gun during their fateful altercation.

Grand jurors’ decision about whether Wilson will face criminal charges could be handed down at any time. Some activists are not content to wait. A group called RbG Black Rebels is offering a $5,000 reward to anyone who provides the location of Wilson, who has reportedly gone into hiding. Taking a page from Niccolo Machiavelli, the Renaissance era courtier who urged the powerful to kill not only their enemies but also their families of their enemies, the group is also offering $1,000 for information on the whereabouts of Wilson’s close relatives.

Whenever the grand jury acts, loathsome leftists like Al Sharpton will be there to further stir the pot. Mob rule, that is Marxist mobocracy, is the model of governance preferred by Marxist community organizers like Sharpton and Barack Obama. Civil unrest is an opportunity, not a tragedy. The more bodies, the better.

The FBI’s expectation of violence shouldn’t surprise anyone. Radical leftists have long held that terrorizing people leads to change. Violence is part of the Left’s stratagem for sociopolitical change. Just one tool in the box. As one organizer in Ferguson recently said, “We’re not going to get change in this society unless white people are just a little bit afraid.”

The organizer is echoing the words of the late neo-communist activist Richard Cloward. As I explained in my book, Subversion Inc., Cloward and his wife Frances Fox Piven devised a strategy to force change by flooding the nation with welfare recipients.

Cloward wanted the poor to rise up violently against The System. Poor people would benefit more than other groups “from a major upheaval in our society,” he said. The poor only make progress “when the rest of society is afraid of them.”

As tensions rise in Ferguson and other cities across America in anticipation of the grand jury announcement, the FBI reportedly issued an intelligence bulletin to law enforcement agencies all over the country. The FBI is warning that extremist protesters “will likely” threaten and possibly attack police officers or federal agents.

Electrical or water treatment facilities could be targeted and “hacktivists” like the group Anonymous could carry out cyber-attacks against authorities, ABC News reports.

“The announcement of the grand jury’s decision … will likely be exploited by some individuals to justify threats and attacks against law enforcement and critical infrastructure,” the FBI stated in the recent memo. “This also poses a threat to those civilians engaged in lawful or otherwise constitutionally protected activities.”

The FBI said it believes “those infiltrating and exploiting otherwise legitimate public demonstrations with the intent to incite and engage in violence could be armed with bladed weapons or firearms, equipped with tactical gear/gas masks, or bulletproof vests to mitigate law enforcement measures.”

Of course the use of the verb infiltrating is curious. These people won’t be hijacking the protests, as the FBI implies. They already run the show.

The union goons, Afrocentrist militants, open-borders advocates, leftover ACORN activists, and Occupy Wall Street thugs are all allies of President Obama and they are already on the ground in Ferguson, as they have been for months. Their violent so-called protests which involve Molotov cocktails and urine are no more legitimate in our constitutional republic than assassinations, thuggery, and bribes.

These terrorists want roughly the same things that Obama wants. It is an open question whether the terrorists in question are pro-Obama or perhaps to the political left of Obama, which is possible but hard to conceptualize given Obama’s radicalism.

Meanwhile, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon (D) declared a statewide state of emergency yesterday and activated his state’s National Guard in anticipation of civil disorder following the grand jury’s decision in the Darren Wilson case. “Regardless of the outcomes of the federal and state criminal investigations, there is the possibility of expanded unrest,” Nixon states in Executive Order 14-14.

While some may applaud Nixon for being proactive, it is important to recall that he is responsible, at least in part, for any unrest that follows because he has engaged in race-baiting and has pandered to the mob that is now screaming for Wilson’s blood.

And let there be no doubt which side the Obama administration is on: rampant chaos, civil unrest, and bloodshed. The Obama administration’s disingenuous disavowals of violence don’t persuade anyone: Obama and his radical colleagues want Ferguson to burn for political reasons. The White House doesn’t give a fig about the outside agitators who have been streaming in to the St. Louis area from Chicagoland and beyond. They are the president’s comrades-in-arms.

If Obama weren’t in the Oval Office, he himself would be in the streets of Ferguson right now doing everything in his power to polarize and demonize Darren Wilson and maximize criminal anarchy.

Remember that Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, sent scores of FBI agents to desperately scour Ferguson for non-existent proof of racial animus by local police. He also sent in the Saul Alinsky Division of the DoJ, the Community Relations Service (CRS), to help disturb the peace. Under Holder, CRS mediators are community organizers paid by taxpayers to facilitate civil unrest.

As Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals, a community organizer must stir up disorder. The organizer’s first job is “community disorganization” by manufacturing crises in order to inflame the community. The organizer must “create the issues or problems,” which is exactly what the Obama administration and allies like Al Sharpton have done in Ferguson in the complete absence of evidence that Michael Brown suffered an injustice at the hands of local police.

A community organizer must “rub raw the resentments of the people of the community,” Alinsky wrote, and “fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression.” Overt expression, of course, is leftist-speak for politically motivated violence.

The organizer must “agitate to the point of conflict” because without friction and controversy “people are not concerned enough to act,” Alinsky wrote. Having harangued the community out of its feelings of complacency, the organizer then directs its rage at specific targets and scapegoats, providing “a channel into which the people can angrily pour their frustrations.”

Even now Holder is trying to ramp up tensions in the black community. Nothing else can explain his outrageous, downright kooky comparison of would-be cop killer Michael Brown to lynching victim Emmett Till.

Till was brutally tortured and murdered on Aug. 24, 1955 in Money, Miss. He reportedly flirted with a white woman in a grocery store. Four days later two white men abducted him, beat him, gouged out an eye, shot him in the head, and dumped his weighted-down body in a river. In a shameful miscarriage of justice, an all-white jury acquitted Till’s killers who later admitted their guilt to Look magazine, knowing that the double jeopardy rule precluded a second prosecution for their crimes.

Although Holder didn’t mention Brown or Ferguson in his prepared remarks yesterday at a tree planting ceremony commemorating Emmett Till, he worked Ferguson in during remarks to MSNBC, echoing his infamous accusation that America is “a nation of cowards” on the topic of race.

“The struggle goes on and it’s not only Ferguson,” Holder told the barely watched cable TV network. He continued:

There are other communities around our country where we are dealing with relationships that are not what they should be, be they officials in their communities that they are supposed to serve. Or really on a more personal level there is an enduring legacy that Emmett Till has left with us that we have to still confront as a nation.

Holder won’t admit that Brown was a vicious 18-year-old thug because his ugly ideology will not allow it. Brown was a victimizer and Till was a victim. Just about the only thing Till and Brown have in common is that they are both dead.

Holder’s bizarre analogy brings into clearer focus why the Department of Justice invited a deranged 27-year-old Islamist named Bassem Masri to share his thoughts on police reform in light of events in Ferguson.

Masri calls police “pigs,” supports the terrorist group Hamas, and said he hoped the recently deceased comedian Joan Rivers would “burn in hell” for siding with Israel in its ongoing conflict with the Palestinians.

During protests in Ferguson, Masri aggressively needled police officers. After VonDerrit Myers, another black teenage male, was shot Oct. 8 by a local cop, Masri baited officers. “Get the f*** out of here with your coward ass boys! Your life is in danger, homie, you gotta go,” he said. “I’m praying for your death, and your death and your death,” Masri told individual officers.

In another cop-baiting episode, Masri compared police to the murderous Islamic State (ISIS). “I see ISIS in front of me,” he said. “Hamas? They’re real men. You go stand with Hamas and see if you’re going to stand a day.”

Masri was in the news when he shut down a live CNN broadcast in Ferguson on Oct. 20. “You’re all run by Zionists,” Masri shouted at a CNN correspondent. “They’re all run by Israel, so they’ve all got to go,” he added.

Masri is Eric Holder’s idea of a model citizen. He’s the kind of person Obama and friends want to be a vital part of the democratic process — whether he votes or not.

Ferguson, St. Louis, and other cities across the country could soon be at the mercy of an army of unbalanced extremists like Bassem Masri. That’s exactly what the Obama administration wants to happen.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • truebearing

    This is Obama’s Reichstag moment. He wants things to go completely out of control so he ends up with total control. His narcissistic rage over the election, his lifelong racism, his dual fueled dogmatism — Marxism and Islam — are all served by this persecution of a white cop doing his duty.

    Obama feels entitled to power and appears to have had it with democratic process. Malignant narcissist that he is, he wants it all, he wants it now, and he wants to punish all of those who have ever opposed, criticised, or mocked him. His deep and abiding hatred of whites, especially cops, that he learned at the feet of his racist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, is now boiling over. No doubt it is boiling according to plan.

    Obama is done pretending to be a president. He is seizing power and daring anyone to stop him. He is going nihilistic on the American justice system and the rule of law. The Left has lost its unity and its cover…so now Obama will make the naked lunge for power.

    • hiernonymous

      Good. You’ve committed yourself to an analysis. Let’s see how accurate it turns out to be.

      • truebearing

        Not to brag, because there is nothing I would have preferred more than to have been utterly wrong, but I haven’t been wrong about Obama’s agenda since he began his unfortunate candidacy for president.
        In Obama’s case, his past has accurately predicted his future. He consorted with enemies of the US, from Farrakhan, Wright, Khalidi, Ayers, Davis, etc. throughout his post-Harvard years.

        In college he admittledly associated with Marxists.

        He was indoctrinated into Marxism and Islam from childhood, both of which are antithetical to American culture, Judeo-Christian morality, and our form of governance.

        Once in the US, still a child, he was further indoctrinated into a racist version of Marxism by Frank Marshal Davis.

        He is a racist and a pathological liar by training and by choice. He is a dedicated disciple of Alinsky’s evil doctrines. He taught them at the college level.

        He ran for his first office in Chicago as a New Partian and a Democrat, simultaneously. The New Party was a disguised Communist Party creation designed to gain power through a dual candidacy scheme where Democratic votes would secretly elect communists. Dual candidacy was struck down by the Supreme Court, but the fact remains that Obama ran as a communist and is fundamentally a transnationalist to this day.

        Transnationalism is hostile to any nation, especially the US, since we are the leaders of the free world….or were. His political benefactor and some say puppetmaster, George Soros, called America “the biggest impediment to a global government” and vowed to destroy the US economy if Bush won in 2004. Soros has been a partner in the Obama presidency from day one. Everything on Obama’s agenda is identical the the proposed agenda of the Open Society Institute’s agenda, circa 2008. OSI is the Soros international flagship organisation, from which the Center for American Progress originated. Again, Leftism is transnational and transnationalism of any flavor is terminally antagonistic to a democratic republic.

        Obama is evil, and he always has been. He will be recorded in history of the Great Scourge of America.

        • hiernonymous

          i wouldn’t brag about recycling my old recycled rants, either. But be that as it may, you’ve now put your credibility on the line with a concrete analytic conclusion. Good on you for doing so, and rather than endure another meaningless political diatribe, let’s wait, watch, and see what happens.

          If Obama uses this as an excuse to abandon representative democracy and establish a dictatorship – and the acid test of this will be his remaining in power beyond the 2017 inauguration – I’ll take back all of the contemptuous comments I’ve made about your Obama-related commentary. If, on the other hand, he steps down as scheduled, you will be exposed as the primary contributor to man-made global warming.

          • Pete

            Using so called “executive amnesty” is a huge abuse of power every bit as much as not stepping down.

            If he had been white, he would be impeached the day after the pen hit the paper.

            Why not step down. The deed is done, the wound is mortal. You shoot a deer & you do not drop it , you don’t start right after it. You wait 15 minutes.

            Obama will just retire to operation a 9 figure foundation (~ like Clinton) ,set his hours, pontificate and cause trouble like the execrable Soros.

            Soros who by the way is pulling put his hair about now. He threw all that money around from Ukraine to the U.S. He got a Democrat elected President and now everything is going to shat. Could not happen to a nicer person.

          • hiernonymous

            Executive amnesty has precedent. Trying to prevent or ignore an election and retaining power does not. This does not imply lay endorsement of said amnesty, but suggesting that it is in the same category as overthrowing the Republic is a bit silly.

          • Pete

            Following bad precedent is not good policy. Just because you knock the support out of something and the whole edifice does not fall does not mean that you can knock another support out from under the edifice and expect it not to fall.

            Why don’t you read up on the term foedus.

            Reagan and congress together passed an amnesty law for 3 million people or so. Obama proposes to do this himself. There is a big difference. There is no quid pro quo. Basically it is a f_ck you, GTH by Obama.

          • hiernonymous

            “Following bad precedent is not good policy. ”

            Also quite true. But having precedent shifts the discussion from whether the individual has the authority to take an action to whether the action is, of itself, wise.

            Not sure how you think the foedera are relevant here.

          • Pete

            One foedus was precedent for another. They could say after all there is precedent.

            How did that work?

          • hiernonymous

            The existence of multiple foedera certainly suggests that they were a legitimate and recognized tool of statecraft. Whether a particular foedus was wise or not was another question, and it also depended on what type it was.

          • Pete

            Reagan signing Simpson-Mazoli Act legalizing 3 million illegal immigrants is not the same thing as Obama by fiat legalizing 5 million illegals by executive amnesty.

          • hiernonymous

            “Reagan signing Simpson-Mazoli Act legalizing 3 million illegal immigrants is not the same thing as Obama by fiat legalizing 5 million illegals by executive amnesty.”

            Too true, it’s not. Nobody’s talking about Reagan signing Simpson-Mazoli. However, both Reagan and Bush then subsequently extended amnesty to individuals not covered by Simpson-Mazoli. That is the same, to the extent that the issue is the authority of the President to do such things.

          • Pete

            I heard on the radio that there were 39 amnesties.

            Extending a signed law through sleight of hand or not is not the same as sleight of hand when there has been no law passed although there as been much national debate and floor debate about one.

            Seeing as how there are many who reluctantly would get on board if there were decent border enforcement, decent visa enforcement (the other 40%), and a law or amendments stating in plain English what 14th amendment means so that asinine judges do not engage in interpretive skullduggery, we could have had this passed back in 2007.

            But the border fence was not built completely, the border agents are pulled way back to HQ for all practical purposes and the Democrat party, the Chamber of commerce & RINOs are giving everyone a big FU with a smile on their face.

    • I_Am_Me

      If this happens, it will be historic. And it will far more compelling than what’s going on with the Kardashians and Honey BooBoo. Might rattle the cages of the drugged and stupefied populace as well.

    • tagalog

      I have to say, it’s very tempting to accept what you say about Obama seizing power and daring anyone to stop him. It certainly looks like that. He isn’t acting like a Constitutionalist at all.

      • truebearing

        He studied the constitution to be better prepared to supplant it. He despises everything about this country, and more and more people are returning that sentiment to him. He can’t endure rejection. His rage will compel him to get even and to seek more power, not necessarily in that order.

    • Scar

      The “Reichstag moment” is quite possibly an apt analogy. Would kristallnacht be far behind?

  • Bamaguje

    “We’re not going to get change in this society unless white people are just a little bit afraid” – Black Ferguson agitator.

    Really??
    These Black rabble rousers who want to provoke a race war are so daft, they don’t seem to realize that Blacks are a vastly outnumbered minority who are bound to disastrously loose such a war.

    • Sheik Yerbouti

      It seems like black Americans have already declared a war on white people and it is well underway. But this is not common knowledge because the crimes blacks commit are continually “excused” away as the price white people will have to pay for slavery/segregation/life’s failures. The press, black America’s only source for information, is having their absolute way with the situation. All the press has to do is say a white person did something wrong, with no proof at all, and black Americans become instantly enraged and vengeful.

      So yes, blacks think a race war is something they can actually win. Maybe they can, look how the US deals with defeated “enemies”.

  • Elizabeth capecod

    There’s a prevalent mentality out there that feels entitled to disrespect and disbelieve authority. Law enforcement need to wear small cameras to protect themselves, going forward.

    • tagalog

      These people, by the way, have that ghetto mentality that insists on being paid unearned respect. If you don’t give them that unearned tribute, you’re dissing them and must be punished severely.

      • pintorider

        Well said. And it doesn’t take much to “diss” a negro.

  • kT TK

    The big question: how large a presence are the muslim groomers in Ferguson? Incensing troubled minorities to violence over manufactured grievance? http://umarlee.wordpress.com/2014/11/13/muslims-in-ferguson-the-real-story/

  • http://johnnyangeladvocacygroup.net JohnnyAngel Advocacy Group

    GUANTANAMO is where terroristas should be !!

  • http://tinatrent.com/ Tina Trent

    In the week Till was murdered, many other were victimized brutally by assailants white and black. More to the point, there were multiple revenge race assaults against whites in the decades before and after Till, while his case stands alone as one of a handful of unprosecuted white race assaults after WW II. That is why it is memorialized endlessly — there are not other examples. But I could produce a list 100 pages long of racially motivated black on white violence in that period.

    Of course, these other crimes and stories have been suppressed. Disappeared.

    Meanwhile, Officer Wilson is being threatened by a lynch mob as vicious and dangerous as any faced by black or white victims 100 years ago. And Eric Holder and Barack Obama are encouraging the lynch mob. Not even Woodrow Wilson went that far. We have decended into a spiral of destruction of our justice system. The lynchers rule and despite fifty years of “sensitivity education” to condemn such behavior, it is clear that the real ambition of such education — perpetuation of selected race hatred and justification of race violence — is alive and well.

    Of course, others have been lynched by Al Sharpton in recent decades and decent people did nothing. They will do nothing this time. Many thousands gone, as James Baldwin said in another context, an ironic one now.

    • tagalog

      I thought the Emmett Till case was prosecuted and ended with an acquittal. Live and learn.

      • http://tinatrent.com/ Tina Trent

        You’re not getting my point.

        Right — there were other cases — those with offenders were prosecuted, so they were heinous crimes but not lynchings. Justice was sought. Society condemned it; the justice system acted on it. Thus these were acts of individual terrorism, not approved or supported by society.

        Meanwhile, countless victims of violent black interracial race hatred remain faceless and unremembered today. Can you name even one of the dozens of police assassinated in major cities throughout the U.S. by black radicals looking for pigs to kill? Can you name even one female rape victim brutalized for her skin color in the politicized rapes of the Sixties and Seventies within activist circles?

        • tagalog

          How’s about Waverly Brown and Edward O’Grady? I remember them.
          You said that the murder of Emmett Till was unprosecuted. That’s not true. It was prosecuted.

          • http://tinatrent.com/ Tina Trent

            You’re right, the killers were wrongfully acquitted. It’s all mob rule of one sort or another. OJ Simpson was wrongfully acquitted. Some clients of the Innocence movement are declared innocent wrongfully, and people just shriek racism while burying facts.

            My actual point remains that the murder of Till and a handful of other victims of vicious white racism are memorialized endlessly while the equal suffering of hundreds of thousands of others at the hands of black racists and black criminals — including other blacks and extending up until today — is not only ignored, it is actively denied, buried, and scorned. And justice denied is hardly something that only happened to Emmet Till or exclusively to blacks.

            Few crime victims receive justice, yet we deny the existence of such injustice, doubly so if their offender was a black man.

          • tagalog

            I doubt that there were very many who would deny the injustice of what happened to Emmett Till and other black victims of white racism. Nor would most people deny that mob demands for “justice” when what they are really seeking is vengeance, are unjust. I, like many others, also see the injustice of what happened to, say, Reginald Denny. Just about everyone considers mob rule unjust by its very nature, whether it’s a majority-black mob or a majority-white one.

            And to make it entirely clear – Emmett Till was not lynched (you didn’t say he was), he was beaten to death then tied to an industrial fan and his body thrown in a river.

            Is Emmett Till any less an icon to the Civil Rights struggle than Wesley Everest is an icon to the movement for organized labor? Why shouldn’t he be?

          • http://tinatrent.com/ Tina Trent

            “some people see rioting as a fun experience. Breaks the monotony, especially when there’s no real risk of life or limb involved” — agreed, and a point that gets overlooked

            Semantics, but “lynching” was not limited to the rope-and-crowd version. Both as defined by the public and activists and later by legal definition, lynching was taking extralegal action in response to a crime, alleged crime, or perceived social violation, whether or not the victim was guilty of the crime (and many lynching victims were guilty, white and black). Hanging was common but not necessary to met the qualification. Whites were lynched, whites lynched blacks for crimes committed against blacks, and blacks lynched each other, though those cases were often left out of activists’ records like those by Ida B. Wells.

            Throughout history, the toll of so-called “ordinary” crime has always been far, far higher.

    • Pete

      List them, print them reproduce excerpts of the primary records.

      Some people are so high a their grievances and they have an incomplete view of the world as it was that you bring up they cases in a way that cannot be refuted thats some of the will go HUMMANA HUMMANA HUMMANA, other will try to shout you down

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

    Let’s compare:

    “At least four people have been pushed in front of city subways in less than two years — all of them Asian immigrants.”
    http://nypost.com/2014/11/17/at-least-4-people-pushed-in-front-of-subways-in-less-than-two-years/

    Where’s Al Sharpton? Where’s Obama? Where’s Holder? Obviously there’s something anti-Asian going on here but there hardworking people don’t count. It’s a criminal like Brown that has the sympathy of other criminals.

  • Adheeb

    Let not your heart be troubled, the Federal government will bring civil rights violation charges to keep the natives happy. Remember Rodney King.

  • Joe Esposito

    At the first sign of violence, Shoot to kill. Us white folk aren’t scared of any low-life racist like Bassem Masri or his ilk. . Bring it on. Lock and load and ready to fight it out if you all are man enough.

    • MichaelVWilson

      I’m an ex-Marine who qualified Expert on the rifle range. My ‘lock and load’ is at 500 meters with iron sights.

      • tagalog

        What kind of groups do you shoot using iron sights at 500 meters?

        • Larry Larkin

          I used to shoot a bit less than head sized groups at that range using a standard ex-WWII SMLE No1. It’s fairly easy.

          • tagalog

            Well, easy or not, that’s certainly Expert-level shooting.

  • MichaelVWilson

    Hmm…let me see if I’ve got this right:

    Michael Brown attacked a cop. Result: shot dead.
    Agitators threaten to attack cops if that cop isn’t charged. Result….

    • Larry Larkin

      Large numbers of them? Not a problem, treat them to a Napoleon’s whiff of grape.

      • tagalog

        GrapeSHOT. That selfsame image has been rolling around in my imagination for quite a while now.

        • UCSPanther

          Many of your so-called “college revolutionaries” don’t realize that actual revolutions require real work and sacrifice, up to and including having one’s blood spilled, a concept that is beyond most spoiled students.

          Intimidating a cowardly and politically correct administration with unloaded firearms is one thing, but getting into an actual battle with military personnel who are “playing for keeps” is completely another.

  • Hard Little Machine

    Let them burn the city to the ground. What’s the worse that happens, they elect a black mayor and proceed down the chute to Detroit.

  • tagalog

    Cloward says, “The poor only make progress “when the rest of society is afraid of them.”
    Poor Mr. Cloward; he’s experienced too many years of peace, power, and artificially sustained deference to understand how the power relationships really work in every society. Push ‘em hard enough, sir, and they’ll shoot you.
    I watched the TV news (CBS) yesterday, as one black “activist” said to the cameras, “we want an indictment, and if we don’t get it the city will do down.” Well, that’s clarifying; they used to mask their lust for vengeance and mayhem in a demand for justice. I’m glad they came clean on that issue.

    • nomoretraitors

      They’ll be headed to your neighborhood to continue burning and looting

      • tagalog

        I’ve been there, or close to there. I think me and my homies can probably handle it.

    • GowithGod

      Cloward had a feminist “wife” who recruited him into the position.

      But it was *HIS* choice to allow himself to be so recruited.

  • krinks

    Acts like this are encouraged. It gives the gov’t a bird’s eye view of what they can get away with to crush dissent. You’d think blacks would be smart enough to see the same people that are encouraging them to riot are lining up the storm troopers to crush them.

  • steve b

    THE POLICE SHOULD SHOOT EVERY RIOTER AND LOOTER. BRING IN SOME VEHICLE MOUNTED MINI-GUNS AND YOU CAN KILL HUNDREDS IN A COUPLE OF MINUTES. ADDITIONALLY, ARMED HOMEOWNERS AND BUSINESS OWNERS SHOULD SHOOT ANYONE ATTEMPTING TO LOOT THEIR PROPERTY. IF THEY WANT A REVOLUTION, LET IT START NOW. THERE ARE 100 MILLION LEGAL GUN OWNERS IN THIS COUNTRY AND MOST OF THEM ARE NOT RIOTERS. WHEN THE SMOKE CLEARS THERE WILL BE NO MORE RIOTS – JUST A LOT OF BODIES TO BURY!

  • tagalog

    Cloward says, “The poor only make progress “when the rest of society is afraid of them.”

    Poor Mr. Cloward; he’s experienced too many years of peace, power, and artificially sustained deference to understand how the power relationships really work in every society. Push ‘em hard enough, sir, and they’ll shoot you. Then you will begin to understand who is going to fear whom. When push comes to shove, the powerful will always dominate the powerless if they have the will.

    I watched the TV news (CBS) yesterday, as one black “activist” said to the cameras, “we want an indictment, and if we don’t get it the city will do down.” Well, that’s clarifying; they used to mask their lust for vengeance and mayhem in a demand for justice. I’m glad they came clean on that issue.

    It’s disgusting to see the TV reporters nearly salivating over the prospect of the Burning of the Cities Revisited.

    Once they destroy Ferguson, where do they expect to go? How will they live?

  • Servo1969

    “will likely be exploited?”
    “exploitation” of mass demonstrations “could occur?”

    Make no mistake-
    These professional Communist agitators haven’t spent the last few months busing in people and supplies, conducting training classes and printing signs so they could just pack up and walk away. They want riots and blood and they’re going to make it happen by any means necessary.

    If the jury doesn’t indict Wilson they will protest by burning everything down.
    If the jury does indict Wilson they will celebrate by tearing everything up.

    They’re going to tear everything to pieces and they’re going to do it no matter what the jury decides.

  • 20pizzapies

    The folks in Ferguson are counting on a failed indictment , as they are expecting early free Christmas shopping . The Governor is wise to have the National Guard already called up and at the ready . I find it curious the Mr.& Mrs. Brown who are presently making their rounds on the sympathy circuit , found it necessary to have their “baby boy ” go live with Grandma .What were they teaching this boy who walked into a business with impunity , stole merchandise , and simply pushed the proprietor out of the way as he strutted out the door and onto the street , and then assault a cop and attempt to take his gun ? That will get you shot no matter what color you are . And the racist Holder , as much as he wanted to , could find no civil rights violation in the actions of the police .

  • Cappy1437

    I have absolutely no compassion for scumbag, low-life thug Michael Brown. The color of his skin isn’t an issue. He was a thug who should’ve been shot by the storekeeper. This is why Americans need to have access to guns to protect themselves from the Michael Browns who seem to be protected now by Obama and Holder. ABSOLUTELY NO COMPASSION FOR MICHAEL BROWN. HE GOT WHAT HE DESERVED.

  • DontMessWithAmerica

    Since Obama is constantly criticizing Israel
    for building housing which in his rationale leads to war, it is time for
    Netanyahu and other world leaders who have been recipients of his criticism and
    meddling to make noise about Obama’s interference in local affairs such as
    Ferguson and his racist motivations. Let Canada and Mexico express
    contempt for their neighbor’s racism and endangerment of U.S. citizens.
    Let Egypt complain to the United Nations about Obama’s interference in
    their country and also complain about how he damages Egypt’s one-time friend,
    America. Then let law enforcement members from all states of the Union descend
    on Ferguson to impress on the lawless rabble that this is still a country that
    will not be run by outlaws.

  • laura r

    remember there are other cities which will riot. i think wilson willbe indicted. heres one for the black team. mark my words, they also will riot regardless. its threatre & the show must go on.

  • tagalog

    I’d like there to be lots of cameras there, too. I suspect that there will be. I’m hoping all this threatening of violence is just empty posturing.

  • Libslayer

    The looters, the rioters, the arsonists, the black supremacists, the grifters, the America-haters, the anarchists, the race baiters like Sharpton, Jackson and Wright, the extreme left of the leftist democrat party-
    These are Eric Holder’s “people”.

    Holder and Obama want nationwide race riots.
    “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

  • MarilynA

    The Gov. of Oklahoma needs to take a page out of Ronald Reagan’s book. As Gov. of California, Reagan stopped all that student rioting, burning college buildings etc. in the 1960s with one act. He mobilized the National Guard, fitted them with gas masks and fixed bayonets, had them surround the rioters in downtown Los Angeles, slowly close ranks, forcing them back into one city block area, then dropping nausea gas on them from helicopters while the National Guard prevented them from leaving the area. That was the end to the student protests that were destroying our higher education system in the 1960s. It worked then. why wouldn’t it work now?

    • tagalog

      Well, it didn’t exactly stop Kent State and Jackson State in 1970, or the rash of demonstrations that followed.
      Also there were the Weatherman Days of Rage in 1969 all over the country.

  • tagalog

    A couple of years ago, we had a little moment in my city when the homeless began to camp in large groups along the creek that runs through town, Fountain Creek. It became an eyesore, with people copulating in the creek, throwing their trash in it, abandoning stolen shopping carts and other stuff in it, and so on. They were also panhandling aggressively as they saw that they had intimidating strength in numbers. There was ultimately a killing, a woman beaten to death. A couple of robberies. They kept walkers and bicycle riders from using the path along the creek. There was no statute forbidding camping along the creek, as it is not formally a city park, more of a greenway. When the city council began debating making a specific law prohibiting camping along the creek, the ACLU chimed in with the threat of a lawsuit. The derelicts were often interviewed by the local media, and they began to get an inflated idea of their importance in the general scheme of things. A few threats were made aimed at the general populace.

    I live a couple of miles from the area. There was a bit of rumbling from the Hoovervillians about banding together and marching up the hill to demonstrate in our residential neighborhood and generally make us as uncomfortable as they could make us. I then got a working idea of who was armed, who had had previous military or police training, and what could be done by us in the neighborhood to protect ourselves, our loved ones, and the homes we had worked for decades to own. Had those derelicts come up the hill to confront us, it would have been hot for them. I imagined a group of about 300 against about 20 of us homies. What a memorable and unpleasant moment it would have been for them.

  • nomoretraitors

    The police need to respond with overwhelming force to any acts of violence

  • nomoretraitors

    Rubber bullet? I’m hoping the police use the real thing

  • notme123

    with examples like obama, holder, and sharpton do you expect anything good to come out of this. like I said before, riot if wilson is not to go to trial or celebrate with rioting if he goes to trial, either way,,, riot…like 0 said “stay the course”…

  • UCSPanther

    So glad I don’t live in Ferguson or the surrounding area.

    The metaphor of Rome burning and Nero playing the fiddle seems very apt…

  • herb benty

    So, Obama and his Communist “Democrats” love, murder, chaos, mass racism against Whites and revolution. Nice damn voting, America!?

  • A Disqus User

    If EVERY & ONLY Black countries in 1965 opened their borders and let
    hundreds of millions of non-Blacks into their countries, then people in
    government/media force assimilated these non-Blacks into the Black
    population, and then 90 years later, Blacks are expected to be
    minorities in those countries; that’s not done by accident.

    It’s obviously a plan to wipe out the Black race. AKA GENOCIDE

    This is what’s being done to my people, White people. It IS genocide.

    Anti-racist is a code for anti-White

    • tagalog

      If every and only black countries had opened their borders to non-blacks in 1965, the populations of those countries would be mocha-colored today, similar to the South American countries, where racial intermarriage was quite common. And no one would be talking about genocide. Genocide, jeez. Try to avoid the sensationalism, will you please?

      Just as the Jews maintained much of their ethnic and racial identity for millenia, blacks who were intent on maintaining their racial purity could refuse to intermarry with non-blacks and develop cultural reinforcements for those blacks who marry black.

  • Jurseygirl

    Why not? These freaks need to get their sh*t together. Not obeying any law brings destruction. These people could have protested peacefully. Why did they have to burn and loot businesses? What about the people who work and own those businesses? Did these people think about that? How does stealing fight for their cause?

  • Pericles

    “As one organizer in Ferguson recently said, “We’re not going to get change in this society unless white people are just a little bit afraid.”

    Reply to this ‘organizer’: You might get change because white people become enraged. That hasn’t occurred to you, has it? Do you expect white people to put up with your insanity forever?

  • Pericles

    While some may applaud Nixon for being proactive, it is important to
    recall that he is responsible, at least in part, for any unrest that
    follows because he has engaged in race-baiting and has pandered to the
    mob that is now screaming for Wilson’s blood.

    Political Correctness + Appeasement = Riots

  • Pericles

    “And let there be no doubt which side the Obama administration is on: rampant chaos, civil unrest, and bloodshed.”

    At this point this regime is in dire need of a MAJOR distraction from its numerous monumental failures and scandals. Rioting, looting, blood and chaos in Ferguson are just what the Marxist doctor prescribes for this sick regime.

  • Pericles

    “Michael Brown suffered an injustice at the hands of local police.”

    Michael Brown provided the pretext for the anarchy and violence to come. He, himself, became irrelevant a long time ago. Like Tawana Brawley for Al Sharpton, he served his purpose and is no longer needed.

  • Pericles

    Narcissists like Holder and Obama don’t learn from defeat and are not humbled by it. They only become more vindictive and vengeful. Their idea of JUSTICE is getting what they want.

  • mo up in the northeast

    check this out , somewhat unrelated, but MUST viewing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcfLc0SK0OM

  • tagalog

    Who cares? Me for one, because:
    1. There are innocent non-protestors in Ferguson whose lives and property are at risk; and
    2. The protestors might re-locate in my town, and I don’t want them anywhere near me.