The New York Times’ Propaganda War on Egypt

Death-toll-up-to-14-in-massive-Egypt-protests-Morsi-given-deadlineA recent New York Times article exemplifies why the Times simply cannot be trusted.  Written by one David Kirkpatrick and titled “Vow of Freedom of Religion Goes Unkept in Egypt,” the article disingenuously interprets general truths in an effort to validate its thesis.

Much of this is done by omitting relevant facts that provide needed context.  For example, Kirkpatrick makes Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and the military—widely recognized as the heroes of the June 2013 revolution that toppled former President Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood—appear responsible for the poor state of religious freedom in Egypt, when in fact the military has no authority over the judicial system, which is independent.

Even so, there is much evidence that Egypt, while far from becoming a Western-style democracy, is on a better path—certainly than under the Muslim Brotherhood.  But these are seldom mentioned in the NYT report.  Most recently, for example, the military-backed government jailed a popular Islamic scholar for contempt against Christianity—something that never happened under Morsi, when clerics were regularly and openly condemning and mocking Christians.

Similarly, Sheikh Yassir Burhami, the face of Egypt’s Salafi movement, is facing prosecution for contempt against Christianity for stating that Easter is an “infidel” celebration and that Muslims should not congratulate Christians during Easter celebrations.  Previously under Morsi, Burhami was free to say even worse—including issuing a fatwa banning taxi drivers from transporting Christian priests to their churches.

Some positive developments are twisted to look as attacks on religious freedom.   Kirkpatrick complains that “The new government has tightened its grip on mosques, pushing imams to follow state-approved sermons,” as if that is some sort of infringement on their rights, when in fact, mosques are the primary grounds where Muslims are radicalized to violence, especially against religious minorities like Coptic Christians.  This is amply demonstrated by the fact that the overwhelming majority of attacks on churches and Christians occur on Friday, the one day of the week when Muslims congregate in mosques and listen to sermons. 

“State-approved sermons” are much more moderate and pluralistic in nature and the government’s way of keeping radicals and extremists from mosque podiums.

If Kirkpatrick truly cared about the religious freedom of Egypt’s minorities, he would laud this move by the government, instead of trying to portray it as an infringement of the rights of the radicals to “freely” preach hate.

Another positive development overlooked by the article is that Egypt’s native church, the Coptic Orthodox Church, was involved in drafting the new, post-Morsi constitution, and was allowed to voice its opinion over controversial Article Two, which deals with how influential Islamic Sharia will be in governing society.  The Church accepted a more moderate version than the previous one articulated under Morsi, which the Church as well as millions of Egyptian Muslims, were against due to its draconian, Islamist nature.

Speaking of the Copts—who are Egypt’s litmus test concerning religious freedom—a closer examination of them alone demonstrates the disingenuous nature of Kirkpatrick’s observations. 

Early in the report, and in the context of stating that “the new military-backed government has fallen back into patterns of sectarianism that have prevailed here for decades,”  Kirkpatrick asserts that “Prosecutors continue to jail Coptic Christians …. on charges of contempt of religion.”

Interestingly, while this suggests Christians are being jailed under the current government on charges of blasphemy, a close reading reveals that that is not the case.  Rather, Kirkpatrick is referring to the many Copts who were incarcerated under Morsi’s reign, some of whom still remain in jail. 

Kirkpatrick seems to think that those not yet freeing Christians—due to the chaos it would likely cause among the already highly aggrieved Islamist/Salafi population—are as religiously intolerant as those who threw them in prison in the first place.   

Of course, back then under Morsi, when the full extent of “legal” persecution of Christian Copts in the context of “blasphemy” was revealed, the NYT and Kirkpatrick were remarkably silent. 

The dissembling continues.  Writes Kirkpatrick: “Many Coptic Christians and other religious minorities cheered the military takeover because they feared the Muslim Brotherhood, a religiously exclusive movement whose leaders have a history of denigrating non-Muslims” (emphasis added).

Christians did not “fear” the Brotherhood because their leaders have a long “history of denigrating non-Muslims,” but rather because their leaders have a long history of inciting violence and hate against Christians, leading to countless attacks and atrocities on Copts and their churches over the decades. 

Under Morsi, Coptic Christianity’s most symbolic church and papal residence, St Mark Cathedral, was savagely attacked by an Islamist mob, aided and abetted by state security.  Then, Coptic Pope Tawadros said that Morsi had “promised to do everything to protect the cathedral but in reality we don’t see this….  We need action not only words… There is no action on the ground…  This flagrant assault on a national symbol, the Egyptian church, has never been subjected to this in 2,000 years.”

Kirkpatrick also fails to inform his readership that due to Muslim Brotherhood incitement against the Copts for “daring” to participate in the June revolution against Morsi, in “retaliation,” some 80 churches in Egypt were bombed, burned, or simply attacked by Brotherhood supporters. 

Also left unsaid by the NYT is that it was Sisi who pledged that the armed forces would rebuild and renovate the destroyed churches. According to church officials, the army will be done renovating and rebuilding 16 of the churches destroyed by the Brotherhood by the end of June, at which point they will begin phase two of renovating the rest of churches.

Far from pointing this out, Kirkpatrick implies Sisi is indifferent to the Copts, writing for example that “unlike a rival presidential candidate, [Sisi] declined to attend Mass” at the Coptic cathedral during Easter.   The fact is, due to Brotherhood assassination attempts—which the rival presidential candidate need not worry from—Sisi has had to decline many public events, not just Easter. 

From here one can understand why Kirkpatrick’s next assertion makes perfect sense, even as he offers it with some puzzlement: “But the complaints about continued sectarianism have not deterred church leaders from firmly supporting Mr. Sisi as their protector against worse treatment by the Muslim majority.  The Coptic pope, Tawadros II, has hailed Mr. Sisi as overwhelmingly popular, ‘a competent patriot’ on ‘an arduous mission,’ and ‘the one who rescued Egypt.’”

In short, when it comes to religious freedom and tolerance, the current government, although far from perfect, is also better than its Brotherhood predecessor.   Hence why, not only the Coptic Church, but the majority of Egypt’s millions of Christians, support Sisi.

Needless to say, that is not the impression that Kirkpatrick gives, as he quotes an unknown Copt calling the pope’s statements which were supportive of Sisi “stupid and myopic.”

Thus it is only in the most general of ways that Kirkpatrick’s NYT article is accurate—in that, yes, religious freedom is still very problematic in Egypt, especially for minorities such as the Copts.  It is true that police and security often do little to protect the Copts and their churches from Islamists–but this is partially because police stations are also under attack.  Pope Tawadros recently confirmed that, in light of the circumstances, the police and government in general are doing better than under Morsi.

Overlooked and ignored are the true culprits of radicalization—the Muslim Brotherhood and allied Islamists, who, through the mosques and satellite stations, have been radicalizing Egypt for decades.  It will take a long time, if ever, to eradicate their influence, but the post-Brotherhood government is a first step in the right direction—despite the NYT’s nonstop propaganda to whitewash the Muslim Brotherhood and sometimes even al-Qaeda.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • wileyvet

    Of course Mr. Ibrahim, this is the same Muslim Brotherhood that has been operating in the United States since at least 1965. The same MB that Obama has befriended and defended. The same one that Huma Abedin is affiliated with, and the backers of the Ground Zero Mosque, Daisy Khan and her husband.The same MB that has as its stated goal the replacement of The US Constitution with Sharia Law and to bring about the downfall of America from within, by its insidious and nefarious stealth Jihad. What one sees of the Ikwhan in Egypt is just a taste of what they want in America and other places. The New York Times is a disgrace and the Old Grey Lady is approaching life support. Time to euthanize the old bag and remove this traitorous rag from America’s presence.

    • MorganValerioyse321

      my Aunty
      Bella got gold Toyota Land Cruiser only from working off a macbook. more info
      here M­o­n­e­y­d­u­t­i­e­s­.­C­O­M­

  • Chiron_Venizelos

    Another reason to not buy the NY Slimes. The “old grey hag” lost her credibility many years ago. Declining circulation numbers tell the tale.

  • Porkys2istan

    Kirkpatrick is truly deluded, but Sissi only looks good compared to the absolute nightmare that he opposes.

    Nothing will really change until islam itself is destroyed. Sissi may be a ‘moderate’ muslim (perhaps even a closet agnostic/atheist) but as long as 85% of the population in Egypt is muslim there will ALWAYS be a large percentage of muslims that become ‘radicalized’ every year; Year after year, for eternity. There’s no reforming islam. When you take out all the repugnant parts, there’s almost nothing left. Eventually islam will ‘win’ and then destroy itself, or islam will be destroyed.

    I’m hoping (and working) for the latter.

  • Michael Garfinkel

    That nasty piece of work “Pinch” Sulzberger, often described as a man born on third base who thinks he hit a triple – and referred to as “Lucky Sperm” at the Times itself, will yet succeed in destroying that newspaper.

  • herb benty

    the NYT is just plain sickening in it’s treatment of Jews and Christians. Commies exalt hate above love and compassion. Goodness is of no use to leftists.

  • JDinSTL
  • American1969

    Wasn’t the NY Slimes the same paper that sang the praises of Mussolini and Hitler back in the 1930’s? What else is to be expected?

  • kenaan

    I don’t have the eloquence of Mr Raymond ,but I can assure he has a great ability to conceal some brilliant facts as he did previously in the middle of August 2013 when he ignored photos of Muslim brotherhood protesters making a human chain to protect churches . president Morsi had no authority over the Interior Ministry )led by Minister Mohammed Ibrahim then ) that ministry which planned and hired civilians to burn and destroy churches , to create variant subsistence shortages in order to inflame popular stand offs .His Pope Twadros couldn’t keep the reverence of his rank K when he pretended to keep away from political dispute in Egypt , this can be clearly observed in the banners reading : YOUR GOD JESUS CALLS YOU TO SUPPORT GENERAL SISI TO DESTROY MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD .
    if you ask why , the answer is : not to protect the allegedly persecuted Coptic minority .Instead it’s business , to keep the coalition of the powerful financial and economic institutions of the military flourishing industry and the church kingdom of the vast real estate properties in Egypt ,especially in the Peninsula of Sianai>.