English-Language Media Ignores Breivik’s Coming-Out As A Nazi

breivikLast Friday, I published a translation of a Swedish report about a letter mass murderer Anders Breivik had sent to the media, in which he revealed that he was a Nazi, and that he had published his “counter-jihad manifesto” intending to destroy the counter-jihad movement. The Swedish news source Expo Idag (Expo Today) reported:

Anders Behring Breivik has sent out a letter to the international media that Expo Today has reviewed. He describes the letter as a sort of first step in a “peace negotiation” with his political opponents. In the letter, Anders Behring Breivik to some extent changes the rhetoric from that which he used in his so-called manifesto. He says that he used “counter-jihadist” rhetoric in the manifesto to protect “ethno-nationalists” and instead provoke a media campaign against the anti-nationalist counter-jihad supporters. He calls this a strategy of “dual psychology.”

Now Daniel Greenfield has picked up the story, but he is the only one: the English-language media has completely ignored this story, not even bothering to publish stories designed to shore up their earlier demonization of the counter-jihad movement, and claiming that Breivik is cravenly trying to obscure his counter-jihadist tracks, or simply delusional and crazy, as Greenfield does. Instead, no one mentioned it at all. Nothing. The Wall Street Journal published a piece about his claims that he was tortured, but that was as close as any mainstream media outlet came to covering this story at all.

Contrast that to the huge media barrage when Breivik’s “manifesto” was first discovered: I was on NBC for the first time in ten years, I was on the front page of the New York Times, I was on the BBC, and in a hundred other places — everywhere being blamed for the murders. But now, when Breivik says he was a Nazi and was not only not influenced by the counter-jihad movement, but was trying to destroy it?

This isn’t the first time the media has distorted Breivik’s story, although this is the first time it has done it by omission. Although Leftists and Islamic supremacists, as well as hard-Left governing and media elites, will continue to insist that there is something wrong with opposing jihad terror and Islamic supremacism because of this mass murderer, and will continue to claim that I and others somehow “inspired” him, it has been clear for quite some time that Breivik was not a counter-jihadist at all, and could not have been and was not incited to violence by the counter-jihad movement.

In all his quotations of me, Breivik never quotes me calling for or justifying violence – because I never do. In fact, Breivik even criticized me for not doing so, saying of me, historian Bat Ye’or and other critics of jihad terror: “If these authors are to [sic] scared to propagate a conservative revolution and armed resistance then other authors will have to” (Breivik, 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, p. 743). Breivik explains in his manifesto that he was “radicalized” by his experiences with Muslim immigrants in the early 1990s, before I had published anything about Islam (See Breivik, p. 1348).

Breivik also hesitantly but unmistakably recommended making common cause with jihadists, which neither I nor any other opponent of jihad would ever do: “An alliance with the Jihadists might prove beneficial to both parties but will simply be too dangerous (and might prove to be ideologically counter-productive). We both share one common goal” (Breivik, p. 948). He even called for making common cause with Hamas in plotting jihad terror: “Approach a representative from a Jihadi Salafi group. Get in contact with a Jihadi strawman. Present your terms and have him forward them to his superiors….Present your offer. They are asked to provide a biological compound manufactured by Muslim scientists in the Middle East. Hamas and several Jihadi groups have labs and they have the potential to provide such substances. Their problem is finding suitable martyrs who can pass ‘screenings’ in Western Europe. This is where we come in. We will smuggle it in to the EU and distribute it at a target of our choosing. We must give them assurances that we are not to harm any Muslims etc.” (Breivik, p. 949).

But from the media, there was absolute silence on all of this at the time of the murders and ever after, just as there is silence now about Breivik’s Nazi claims. And that, in a nutshell, manifests the sinister agenda of the mainstream media: the objective was never to uncover the facts surrounding Breivik’s heinous murders. It was just to discredit the counter-jihad movement. And for that, Anders Behring Breivik has already served his purpose. At this point, he is no longer useful.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • African-American

    I never bought totally into the notion that Breivik was
    schizophrenic. They typically hear voices and their actions and
    activities are disjointed. One glance at Breivik’s manifesto tells us
    that he is too organized to be a schizophrenic. Also, schizophrenics are
    often discovered (“diagnosed”) in the teenage years and they have
    life-long problems of a dysfunctional life.

    I’m a bit of a skeptic on n of psychiatry as a “medical science.”
    What are “behavior disturbances” are in the eye of the beholder. Having
    wrong information does not make one “mentally ill,” just wrong. The
    “medical field” of psychiatry can be subjective and make faulty


      The fact that “progressives” align themselves with REGRESSIVE people who stone women to death, hang gays, murder filmmakers (Theo Van Gogh), threaten cartoonists with death, threaten writer Salman Rushdie with death, shoot girls in the head for wanting an education (Malala) demonstrates that socialism can be a mental disorder.

      The Red/Green Axis is a manifestation of both sides viewing the other as Useful Idiots.

  • Norweigen

    Whatever his motivations, one thing is crystal clear, that he was a staunch Israel-supporter and a Zionist. Violent extremism in the name of Zionism is the problem.

    Whether the violent extremists are religiously observant or draw on Jewish law for their rationalization is irrelevant.

    Many of the worst war crimes committed by Israel happened under the administrations of secular/nonobservant Jews.


      If Zionism is the problem then Arabs/Muslims/Islamists/Islamofascists would be living in Peace with their NON-ZIONIST neighbors.

      And the murder of Infidels would not be happening ALL OVER THE WORLD.

      And Muslims would NOT be murdering fellow NON-ZIONIST Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen…

      Any more conversations with yourself “African American”?


  • African-American

    Norwegian,,,,while I believe that leaders of countries can and have used racism or
    bigotry of any kind to incite a country towards specific goals of
    conquest I do not believe it is a tact exclusive to Zionists. Sadly it
    has been practiced by all sorts of nations regardless of their
    collective races, creeds, nationalities or religions.

    The US government propaganda of “Manifest Destiny”, was not unlike the Zionist goals of a Jewish state reclaiming the nation that was lost to them.
    Almost every nation in history that tried successfully or not to conquer
    another land, people or nation have always professed a superiority to
    those they seek to conquer or those they seek to blame for the ills of
    the nation. The latter has always been a great excuse for diverting the
    people’s attention from their actual sufferings.

    Please do understand that my thoughts about this is in no way meant as
    an excuse for Zionists or anyone else nor is it meant to divert
    attention from or disagree with you.

    Intentional perversion of any person or people for any reason is an
    insidious act. I just wish for the time when regardless of our faiths,
    or beliefs, or races, etc that we could rather learn to live and let
    live and find the commonality between us all. It’s idealism no doubt,
    but it is an actionable one with each and every decision we make every
    single day of our lives. I believe that it is time for us all to
    wake up to what most often those in power wish to do and how they
    succeed and thrive by dividing us.


      Wow! You managed to not reply to yourself again “African-American” / “Norweigen”.

      So how will you end your brutal occupation of Native American land called America?

      Self Deportation? To where? Noway Norway or Africa?

  • Norweigen

    Your comment would have had more merit if you discussed any
    particular issues.

    Instead, you come across as suggesting that Zionism is beyond criticism.

    I doubt that there is any significant current or historical movement
    that does not have its share of problems, and I see no reason not to
    examine those. The U.S. is great in many ways, with its principle that
    “all men are created equal,” yet that statement was written at a time
    when many black men there in your country were held as slaves.

    If there is one general disagreement I would have, it is you sometimes employs the same tactics that we criticize Islamophobes
    for using. For example, I have seen many
    complaints here that one should not let those opposed to Islam define
    it, especially when they generalize.


      Criticize away.

      Let’s look at Islamofascism.

      Jihad against the ENTIRE WORLD.

      Murder, genocide, misogyny, backwardness, hatred of all people – even fellow Muslims who are the wrong kind of Muslim.

      The Arab Spring hasn’t worked out the way you wished. Morsi is gone. Sadaam is gone. Ghadaffi is gone.

      Soon the ayatollahs of fascist iran will be gone too.


      Slavery ended in the US in 1865.

      Slavery of black people continues to this day in Sudan and Mauritania.

      When is louis farraklan going to the big wheel in the sky? If the US is so bad you would expect the bowtied one to leave, take his followers back to the Motherland.

      Yet they stay in the good ol’ USA.

      Screwy Louie got to sell more bean pies to pay for the one way trip.

    • Omar

      America had its historical flaws, but it has corrected them by following the principles of the Founding Fathers. You, on the other hand, support the black supremacist, Marxist dictatorship of Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. Mugabe’s regime wants to deny citizenship and any civil rights at all to white people. If he could do it, Mugabe would even support enslaving white people in Zimbabwe. Yet, you support that, you Stalinist/Maoist f**k.

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    Zionist political violence refers to acts of violence committed by Zionists.

    Actions were carried out by individuals and Jewish paramilitary groups such as theIrgun, the Lehi, the Haganah and the Palmach as part of a conflict between Zionists,British authorities, and Palestinian Arabs, regarding land, immigration, and control over Palestine.

    British soldiers and officials, United Nations personnel, and Palestinian civilians were targets or victims of these actions. Domestic, commercial, and government property, infrastructure, and material were also attacked.

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    Zionism was formally established by Theodor Herzl, a Jewish journalist from Austria-Hungary, in the late 19th century following the publication of Der Judenstaat, seeking to encourage Jewish immigration to the Palestine. The percentage of world Jewry living in Palestine grew from around 78,000 in 1900 (12% of the population of the Ottoman Palestine) to nearly 6 million in 2005 (76% of the population of Israel).As of 2009, roughly 40% of the world’s Jews live in Israel.

    During World War I, Zionist volunteers fought in the Jewish Legionof the British Army against the Ottoman Turks because they expected the British would be less opposed to the Zionist project than the Ottoman authorities.

  • African-American

    Along these lines, I might as well also state my views on Hamas and Hezbollah, since pro-Israeli apologists and Islamophobes use this as a sort of litmus test to silence opposition (DO YOU CONDEMN HAMAS? DO YOU?). Let it be known then that I condemn and reject Hamas and Hezbollah. Although I recognize the right of the Palestinian people to defend their land and resist occupation (to deny them this right while accepting the right of the occupying power to “defend itself” is the height of colonialist mentality), under no circumstances–none whatsoever–is one allowed to target and kill civilians. Even if Hamas and Hezbollah were to categorically renounce such tactics (and back up their words with actions), I would still not support these groups, which–like the Israeli and Jewish groups I will discuss–hold extremist religious views.

  • African-American

    I may not agree with everything you said, but I do agree with a crucial part of it. Let me clarify:

    If you single out Judaism for criticism, then I think this is Anti-Semitic. In your case, you are an “equal opportunity hater,” so to speak, and therefore are not Anti-Semitic.

    However, in my case, I find “equal opportunity hating” to be somewhat intolerant, inappropriate, and unhelpful. But I wouldn’t call you Anti-Semitic (or Islamophobic). It is the specific targeting of a religion for special scrutiny over others that I consider “-phobic.”

    One must be weary of course of people who troll the internet vilifying Muslims and then whenever they are called out on this they claim to be “equal opportunity haters.” Their deeds say otherwise. I know you not to be one of those (based on your posting history), but these type of trolls do certainly exist in large numbers.

    But for me specifically, certainly it would be a case of bigotry if I vilified Judaism en toto, since I have in the past expressed my distaste for a similar treatment of Islam.

  • African-American

    I just wanted to point out one thing though. The earliest source of, at least some kind of proto-Zionism, is in fact to be traced back to the scripture it self. What this means is that the political secular conception of Herzlian Zionism, allthough non-religious in nature, actually in some manner allude to its early Biblical predecessor. The idea of a Jewish Holy Land just happened to rubb off on its “non g-dly” counterpart. To clarify: Zionism, in its several shapes, ultimatily is liased by what (or preferably HOW) the Bible define the Jew. The very name of Israel, though a northern polythestric tribe, is found in the Bible.

    Zionism per se can’t be accused of being a monolithic and uniform concept. Indeed, even the extreme Neturei Karta are Zionist: they just reject the current form. Based on the Talmudic Three Oaths, many religious groups do in fact turn down the contemporary Zionist establishment as it contradicts their understanding of the Oral tradition – since it specifically is conflicting with the religiously, by G-d, sanctioned state: where bloodshed is strictly forbidden. I would argue, at least to some point, that religious Zionism to an extant, depending on which one of all the interpretations one may argue for, are much more peace-loving than the current state of Zionism in Israel: meaning for example the Likkudan idea.

    Zionism, wheather secular or religious, are not undiversified. The very nature of Zionism is a spectrume of theorizing.

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    Reframing war as a means to peace was and is an integral element of the Zionist project,

    Ever since its colonial project was set in motion, Zionism has insisted that it seeks to colonise Palestine “peacefully”, indeed that its colonisation of the country will not only not harm the native population, but that it would be of benefit to them.

    The movement’s founder, Theodor Herzl himself, provided two visions of this future: A fictional, public vision, advertised in his futurist novel Altneuland, where Palestine would become a Jewish state allowing coexistence with the native Arabs who would be happy and grateful for being colonised and civilised by European Jews; and a secret, logistical and practical strategy to evict the Arab population out of the country, which he spelled out in his Diaries.

    Herzl’s dual approach of declaring peaceful intentions for public consumption behind which he sought to hide Zionism’s violent strategy of conquering the land of the Palestinians would be adopted wholesale thenceforward and continues to be the cornerstone of Israeli policy to the present.

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    Like Herzl, Ben-Gurion would advocate peace with the Palestinians publicly, claiming that the interests of the colonists and the natives were not contradictory, while strategically planning war against the Palestinians in the meetings of the Zionist leadership. However, it would be the logic of Jabotinsky’s arguments that would guide him.

    In 1936, amid the Great Palestinian Revolt against Zionist colonisation and British occupation, Ben-Gurion declared: “It is not in order to establish peace in the country that we need an agreement. Peace is indeed a vital matter for us. It is impossible to build a country in a permanent state of war, but peace for us is a means. The end is the complete and full realisation of Zionism. Only for that do we need an agreement.”

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    Elaborating on the idea that peace is war, Ben-Gurion explained clearly to his fellow Zionists that any peace agreement with an Arab party must be designed to formalise their capitulation to Zionist colonisation. This he declared as early as 1949, following the military triumph of the Zionists and their establishment of the settler-colony: “Egypt … is a big state. If we could arrive at the conclusion of peace with it – it would be a tremendous conquest for us.” Israeli scholar Avi Shlaim has documented much of this in his book The Iron Wall.

    That “conquest” would have to wait thirty years, but when it was realised through the Camp David Accords with Anwar Sadat in 1978, it formalised Egypt’s recognition of the legitimacy of the Jewish settler-colony, the denial of Palestinian sovereignty or rights, except in some deferred “autonomy” plan, and Egypt’s acquiescence in never re-establishing its sovereignty over the Sinai peninsula, which Israel would return to Egyptian partial control without sovereignty.

    The “conquest” of Egypt, of which Ben-Gurion spoke in 1949, was completed at Camp David. At the time, the Palestinians, represented by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) had not yet come around formally to accepting that the colonisation of their country was irreversible and continued to seek its liberation from European Jewish colonialism.

  • Mogh_Korta

    Israell and Israel-Firsters’ PR methods:
    1. We haven’t heard reports of deaths, will check into it
    2. The people were killed, but by a faulty Palestinian rocket/bomb
    3. Ok we killed them, but they were terrorists
    4. Ok they were civilians, but they were being used as human shields
    5. Ok there were no fighters in the area, so it was our mistake. But we kill civilians by accident, they do it on purpose
    6. Ok we kill far more civilians than they do, but look at how terrible other countries are!
    7. Why are you still talking about Israel ? Are you some kind of anti-semite?
    8. Repeat from step 1 (Test this against the next interview you hear or watch.)”


      every day kill palestainian . do u want picture?

  • Mogh_Korta

    Israel loves its Jewish terrorists. Israelis elected their Jewish terrorists to the highest levels of the Israeli government, names streets and buildings for them, erected monuments and lauds them as national heroes. Hypocrisy is one thing at which they are good.

  • Mogh_Korta

    Obviously Israeli Jews DO love their Jewish terrorists. It is as I stated, no matter how much you or your fellow tribesemen try to minimize or deflect from it. Irgun, Lehi, Stern Gang… all classified by MI5 as terrorism organizations Here are some Jewish terrorists your tribe members elected – your national Jewish terrorist heroes:

    Qualifications: Killer. Terrorist. War Criminal. Leader of the terrorist gang Irgun. Responsible for the Deir Yassin massacre, the bombing of the King David Hotel, etc, etc,…

    Qualifications: Killer. Terrorist. War Criminal. Operations commander of the terrorist Stern Gang. Together with Stern proposed a war-time alliance with Adolf Hitler and the establishment of a totalitarian Jewish state. Responsible (with Began) for the Deir Yassin massacre. The organiser of two infamous assassinations: the killing of Lord Moyne, the British Minister Resident for the Middle East, on 6 November 1944; and the slaying of Count Folke Bernadotte, the UN’s special Mediator on Palestine, on 17 September 1948.

  • Norweigen

    Palestine is a state, recognized by the community of nations. No distortion of history, not old book of nationalist myths is going to undo that. Palestine exists. Get used to it.


      palestainian can use It NOT JEW

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    I never knew that any colonization throughout the world would really be beneficial to the indigenous people until now. We all know what zionism and racism mean.

  • Olesegun Obasanjo

    It’s interesting to note that the zionists showed no morals (of course they’ve proven they’re amoral on many occasions) whatsoever in displacing the indigenous people of the region when offered free land. Greed being a trend that they’ve gotten used to along with the murdering and misery creation that accompanies it. Now we all know why stopping settlement building was never going to happen…. it wasn’t part of the plan. It’s also plain to see why Israel kept settlement building while providing lip service to peace… not part of the plan. It’s interesting to note that the French and British, who initiated the zionist barbarism against farmers of the region,

    Well, when the west talks about who is targeting civilians, whoever they mention can’t hold a candle to the targeting of civilians by the west and israel!

  • R K SENC

    The U.S, which maintains 1000 bases in over 100 countries is the rogue state that is the continuing problem to the world.

    The government of the U.S picks and chooses which international bodies and decisions by the majority of U.N. countries it will or will not obey.

    That Bush , Rice, Powell and the corporate media lied their way into a war /invasion they long wanted and that a huge percentage of Americans including most of the military who served there believe that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks, a belief based entirely on more lies seems lost on you.

  • Mogh_Korta

    Over a million innocent civilians dead, large percentage of those were children, the army destroyed, civilian structures wrecked- police etc, no water, food and shelter for many. The Iraqi oil being looted and given away. All history of Iraqi civilization destroyed.
    This guy should hang, just like Blair, bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. I know in the end they will get theirs!

  • Mogh_Korta

    Bush is nothing more than a bloody war criminal…..and they say Muslims are the evil ones…..These baastards waged an entire bloody war on a country based on a Pack Of Lies……Wmds, and Iraq being responsible for 9/11. ……and they hgave the galls to blame the muslims……wat pieces of human wastes, these people are…………

  • Norweigen

    Lying to wage aggressive war on a country is a war-crime by every legal definition. So, by those standards, yes I admit that Iraq war was illegal and the perpetrators of that war ought to be facing war crimes tribunals in the Hague…..

  • Norweigen

    I think Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney and company should be ‘rendered’ to the main intersection of Baghdad, and let the people there hand them the justice he deserves.

  • African-American

    Iraq war was a war-crime by every stretch. Waging an aggressive war on a country based on a PACK OF LIES – WMDs, Responsibility for 9/11 etc. HAS ALWAYS BEEN TERMED AS WAR CRIMES. But the real question is do the people of Iraq have the power to pursue the cases of war crimes at a tribunal in Hague, Netherlands ? Well more than 5000 Iraqi people have already filed cases againt the erstwhile Bush regime and its key players including Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. Several cases are pending against them in several European countries including Switzerland, which Bush refused to visit for fear of being prosecuted.

    It is highly likely that Cheney and Bush would never be able to step put of the confines of their ciuntry by 2017 as more than 20 countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America will become off limits for them.

    However, they are unlikely to face any trouble at home because future American Governments will not be keen on pursuing any war-crimes cases against them.

  • African-American

    The invasion and occupation of Iraq was and is illegal. The reasons given by the US and UK governments for the invasion and occupation of Iraq in March 2003 have proven to be false. … In pursuit of their agenda of empire, the Bush and Blair governments blatantly ignored the massive opposition to the war expressed by millions of people around the world. They embarked upon one of the most unjust, immoral, and cowardly wars in history

  • James-Marks

    Boy George!
    The Great Connector of Dots!
    Conqueror of Baghdad and Fallujah!
    Instrument of the Messiah!


    The violent little imbecile! I hope there was donkey doo on the shoes thrown at him in Iraq.

    And then there is Tony Blair who recently said that, “If there is a two state solution, Israel will get to keep the settlements and the Palestinians will get aaah…, aah…, ah… what’s left.” He said that a couple months ago. I sat here in my lounge room and watched him say that on TV.

    It’s time to call in Jimmy Carter. Way past time. The Clintons were and are a joke.

    The only thing we remember of Obama’s visit to Cairo is the incovenience of having him in town for the day.

    It would be well if Muslim nations, to begin with, issued travel bans on Bush and Blair. And the International Criminal Court, in the end, issued warrants for their arrest.

    Through the 2000s, when anyone bothered to survey them, Europeans felt “Israel” was the greatest threat to world peace, presumably due to its theft of Palestinian land, life and liberty. The UK people took a slightly different position, most often indicating that “America” was the greatest threat to world peace, presumably due to its AIPAC inspired acquiescence to Israel’s theft of Palestinian land life and liberty.

    This has gone on long enough. And now Canada is the only very large native English speaking nation that isn’t voting against Palestinian humanity in the UN – Australia’s Prime Minister Gillard now also bowing to AIPAC sorts of forces to save her own wide hide.

    A pox on America in this, its violent adolescence on the world stage. A pox on America and the horsies it rides around upon. I’ll watch it’s rot from Cairo for the rest of my life, I suppose. The people here aren’t so STUPID.

  • Canadian

    Sadly, Canada now has its very own bought & paid for AIPAC lap dancer – Stephen Harper.

    Good news? He’s got a short shelf life.

  • Canadian

    it would be acceptable for the Palestinians and other Arabs to wage war on Israel and simply take the land back. In light of the dramatic changes in the political landscape in the Arab world, Israel has no friends in the area. The emerging nations will most likely be hostile to the attempt by Jewish extremists to practice genocide and ethnic cleansing. The militaries of the Arab world and of Iran have greatly increased in size and power since 1973. I realize that Israel does have almost 200 nuclear weapons, but so does Pakistan. If might makes right, which you seem to be advocating, then I would fully expect Israels neighbors to eliminate it through military means. Wouldn’t it make more sense to actually work with your neighbors than to use threats of violence. AIPAC does exert considerable influence in Washington D.C.; but America will absolutely not participate in a nuclear war to save Israel. America has far to much at stake in keeping Arab oil flowing to go to war with a rapidly uniting Arab people.

  • Canadian

    Using religion as an excuse for land occupation in this case is ridiculous. Why did they leave, and move to europe in such large numbers then? If “god” gave them this land, then they dishonored this “god” by leaving it. Then when they wanted it back, it was no longer theirs, as they had LEFT.
    I won’t even touch on the idiocy of religious belief as a whole.

  • Canadian

    Israel was created by terrorists, remember Irgun and Stern gang, the first bus ever blown up in that region was by jewish terrorists, remember the King David hotel, over one hundred killed Jewish terrorists or Deir Yassin where Jewish terrorists including a former prime minister of israel killed babies, women and children etc etc etc . The verse from the Talmud is in the book “Yalkut Shimoni
    Bereshit 20″ “The garden of Eden has two gates of rubys by which stand sixty varities of pure servants (virgins), when a righteous man arrives they remove his clothes”

  • Canadian

    im sure cheney and co. knew he was lying…this guy admitting he was lying doesnt take away the fact that cheney and bush should be tried for war crimes.

  • Canadian

    The judeo/Western media is fully complicit in this grave crime; and that’s why you should not expect them to publicise the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal’s findings.

    Therefore it’s down to people like us to do the shouting.

    George W Bush. ex US President. Criminal. Found guilty of War Crimes and Crimes against humanity.

    Tony Blair. ex British Prime Minister. Criminal. Found guilty of War Crimes and Crimes against humanity.

  • Canadian

    Bush launched a war of aggression based on false premises against Iraq. If Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist, then Bush is a war criminal. When will he be brought to justice? When will the world label him a war criminal and condemn him for his crimes?

  • Accrete

    Ahh yes America and britain dropped flowers on Iraq to try and get them to change their ways, then they dropped cotton wool on Afghanistan and in Pakistan America is using cuddly toys. I suggest you do something called research and you will see more men women and children have been blown up by the west than any Muslim or muslim nation.

  • Accrete

    Yeah right US invaded Iraq to save the Iraqi people. lmao

  • I R Ramos

    ALL peace loving peoples of the world condemned both the attacks on 9/11 and the illegal occupation of the West Bank by Israelis. American news media do not report both circumstances equally.

  • I R Ramos

    Gaddafi–Bin-Laden–Saddam–etc should have been tried in the I.C.C.and if found Guilty should be sentenced to Life in Prison if that indeed was possible now.

    Bush and Blair should join them if found Guilty. All would have been found Guilty of Crimes against Humanity.

    There should be no Death Penalty as when we take an Eye for an Eye the World is still Blind and condemns it’s self to live in Ignorance to the cause of all Wars.

    All these International Criminals should be allowed to Defend themselves, then and only then will we ever solve the Cancer of War, and it may even go a long Way to Solving the other Cancer against Humanity, Drought and the inevitable Starvation.

  • James Chan

    Are you suggesting that Bush and Blair and all the other high rankers who put together the big lie to invade the sovereign nation of Iraq are innocent?

    Or are you suggesting that people of Eastern nations should not meddle with criminal justice initiatives to bring about accountability for grave war crimes; and that those kinds of actions should only be emprivileged to the West?

  • James Chan

    Hi, I’m an illustrator and rendered the photo of Blair and Bush accompanying this opinion piece for a bit of exercise and to give others a good laugh. Tell me what you think.

  • James Chan

    Hi, I’m an illustrator…..I have rendered the photo of Blair and Bush accompanying this opinion piece for a bit of exercise and to give others a good laugh. Tell me what you think. I need your opinion on the same

  • UCSPanther

    George Bush was so 2008. Time left you left-wing spammers behind years ago.