The Caliphate Restored

isis-declares-islamic-caliphate-in-occupied-areas-in-iraq-and-syria-1404070577The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) has declared itself a caliphate, renamed The Islamic State, and named its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the caliph, and demanded that all Muslims worldwide pledge allegiance to him. Al-Baghdadi has called upon all Muslims to relocate to his caliphate to wage war against non-Muslims. Many have ridiculed and denigrated this declaration; few have realized its implications.

The restoration of the caliphate has for decades been the central goal of jihad groups worldwide. The caliphate (khilafa) was from the beginnings of Islam until the early twentieth century, at least among Sunnis (who constitute eighty-five to ninety percent of Muslims worldwide), the center of the supranational unity of the global Muslim community (umma). The caliph, who was theoretically chosen from among the most pious and capable men of the community, was considered to be the political, military and religious successor of Muhammad as the leader of the Muslim community. He ruled according to the dictates of the Sharia (Islamic law), implementing Allah’s decrees of justice on earth.

The caliphate was abolished by the secular Turkish government in 1924. The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 partly as a reaction to the end of the caliphate, and from the beginning a central part of its program has been the need to work toward restoring it and then recovering lands that had been lost to Islam. Brotherhood founder Hasan al-Banna explained:

We want the Islamic flag to be hoisted once again on high, fluttering in the wind, in all those lands that have had the good fortune to harbor Islam for a certain period of time and where the muzzein’s call sounded in the takbirs and the tahlis. Then fate decreed that the light of Islam be extinguished in these lands that returned to unbelief. Thus Andalusia, Sicily, the Balkans, the Italian coast, as well as the islands of the Mediterranean, are all of them Muslim Mediterranean colonies and they must return to the Islamic fold. The Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea must once again become Muslim seas, as they once were.

The kind of government that would then be established would not be a pluralistic democracy by any stretch of the imagination. Hamza Tzortzis of the Britain-based Islamic Education and Research Academy has stated this plainly:

We as Muslims reject the idea of freedom of speech, and even the idea of freedom. We see under the Khilafa [caliphate], when people used to engage in a positive way, this idea of freedom was redundant, it was unnecessary, because the society understood under the education system of the Khilafa state, and under the political framework of Islam, that people must engage with each other in a positive and productive way to produce results.*

The desired results, obviously, have nothing to do with freedom as it is understood in Western societies. Abu Mohammad al-Julani, leader of the Syrian jihad group Jabhat Al-Nusra (Al-Nusra Front), has expressed a desire to establish a caliphate in Syria, explaining: “Being Muslims, we do not believe in political parties or parliamentary elections, but rather in an Islamic regime based on the Shura (advisory council) and which implements justice … Our heading towards the establishment of Islamic law is jihad in Allah’s way.”

Ahmad ‘Issa, commander of another Syrian jihad group, the Suqur Al-Sham Brigades, interviewed on Al Jazeera network on June 12, 2013, joined Barack Obama in praising Islam’s imperative for justice, which he said the caliphate had always manifested: “We have been providing the minorities with their rights ever since the establishment of the state of Islam, since the beginning of the Caliphate in the days of the Prophet Muhammad, and in the days of the Righteous Caliphs, and to this day. Throughout history, nobody has suffered injustice under the state of Islam – the state of truth and justice.” Nobody!

However, his idea of justice did not involve non-Muslims having the right to equal participation in the nation’s political life. “Islam,” he said, “must be the single source of authority of the state…We demand that the president and parliament speaker be Sunni Muslims, and that the state’s sole source of authority be Islam.” He said that his group would “not accept” a Christian as the head of the Syrian state. And this would not be a democracy, but a state ruled by Islamic law: “We are talking about a state of justice and truth. We want the people to be ruled by an infallible law – the law of Allah. We do not want people to be ruled by man-made laws….”

On June 21, 2013, Al Jazeera aired a speech of Professor Mohammed Malkawi, the founder of the Chicago-based organization Hizb ut-Tahrir (Party of Liberation) America, which is dedicated to non-violent implementation of Sharia in the U.S. and around the world. The speech illuminated the Islamic supremacist perspective on the abolition of the caliphate and the necessity for its restoration. Malkawi blamed non-Muslims for Islam’s decline and the fall of the caliphate: “After Islam had reached the peak of glory and the Muslims were masters of the world, there came a time when the infidels conspired against the Muslims, who were in a deep slumber. Britain conspired against them, along with Arab and Turkish collaborators and traitors, and ended the Islamic Caliphate and its glory.”

This was, he said, a great tragedy, for also like Barack Obama, Malkawi believed that a state based on Islamic law embodied justice: “Ever since the Caliphate was destroyed, the world has lost an exemplar of justice, a model for humanity in its entirety. Since then, the world has been held hostage by wolves, who do not respect the honor of a man or a believer. Two world wars cost the lives of over 70 million people, yet they accuse us of terrorism. They killed over 70 million people, and dropped atomic bombs on Japan, yet they level accusations against us.”

In contrast, Malkawi said, “We demand a state ruled by the Koran,” and led the crowd in chanting that phrase. Another speaker added: “We reject secularist rule. We reject the rule of Satan.”

Malkawi asserted that the U.S., and Barack Obama in particular, had made people “terrified of the word ‘caliphate.’” He continued:

They say to you: “You can say anything except that you want Islamic law.” For them, Islamic law is something unimaginably harsh. For them, Islamic law prevents usury. It prevents them from exploiting the peoples. Islamic law and the caliphate bring about the rule of justice, which will make all those rulers face piles of garbage— for garbage is all that they are worth.

This is not really why people think Islamic law is harsh. People think Islamic law is harsh because of the stonings, the amputations, the institutionalized oppression of women and non-Muslims, the denial of the freedom of speech, the death penalty for apostasy, and so much more. But as far as Malkawi is concerned, those things and the other elements of Sharia are what constitute justice.

All these other rulers are dwarfs— from Obama, the master of the White House, to the rulers of those palaces in the lands of the Muslims. They are all dwarfed by the Islamic caliphate and law, and that is why they try to make us scared of it. They scare the Muslims. They say to the rebels in Syria: “Do not demand a caliphate out loud, because the US will deny you equipment and aid.” They say to the Egyptian people: “Do not demand to instate Islamic law, because America will not be happy about that.”

They say that the caliphate makes the infidels angry. Don’t we want to make the infidels angry? Isn’t this Islam?

Let America and Britain hate the caliphate. Let Britain, America, and the entire West go to hell, because the caliphate is coming, Allah willing.

And now it is here, although it is by no means clear, of course, that The Islamic State will be viable or long-lasting. If it is, however, the world could soon be engulfed in a much larger conflict with Islamic jihadists even than it has been since 9/11. For in Islamic law, only the caliph is authorized – and indeed, has the responsibility – to declare offensive jihad against non-Muslim states. In his absence, all jihad must be defensive only, which is why Islamic jihadists retail laundry lists of grievances when explaining and justifying their actions: without these grievances and a caliph, they have to cast all their actions as responses to Infidel atrocities. With a caliph, however, that obligation will be gone. And the bloodshed in that event could make the world situation since 9/11, with its 20,000 jihad attacks worldwide, seem like a harmless bit of “interfaith dialogue.”

*Update: Hamza Tzortzis contacted me via Twitter on Wednesday, asking that I clear up my “misrepresentation” of him in this piece. He offered this quite equivocal affirmation of free speech at http://www.hamzatzortzis.com/clarifications-and-responses/clarifying-my-views-on-freedom-of-speech/:

Hamza upholds freedom of expression and asserts that to reject this  liberty is a self-defeating position. However, since he is a student of Islamic thought and philosophy he raises questions on the limits of expression including: since all nations have some restrictions limiting expression, where do we draw the line? What framework of law and values to we use to establish the limits to expression?

Thus Tzortzis clearly wants restrictions on the freedom of speech, and as a Muslim who believes in Sharia, those would no doubt be to restrict the legality of criticism of Islam and negative characterizations of Muhammad.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • simoneshelly

    as
    Thelma explained I cannot believe that a stay at home mom can make $7420 in
    four weeks on the internet . more info here R­e­x­1­0­.­C­O­m

    • Wolfthatknowsall

      Flagged …

      • UCSPanther

        Its another spammer looking for more mugus…

  • mollysdad

    This is why the Caliphate, and all who give their allegiance to it, must be destroyed by all necessary means whatsoever, not excluding in principle the use of weapons of mass destruction.

    • James Lovelace

      I have long advocated that Afghanistan should have been nuked when the Bamiyan Buddhas were destroyed. The scum needed to be taught a lesson: if they were going to destroy a world heritage site, then they should in turn have been destroyed.

      • johnnie the jew

        Couldn’t agree more friend. This was yet another form/manifestation of another dimension, facet of islamic terrorism – cultural terrorism. Ataturk (the only good leader reformer Islam has ever produced) summed up correctly as did Churchill. But, you can be arrested now in England for quoting Churchill !! Un – F ing – believable. Thank you socialism. Keep the faith

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          Paul Weston was arrested for reading out loud the words of Winston Churchill regarding Islam.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Really? How does the Caliphate represent such a grave threat to us that it must be nuked? Will it become an economic powerhouse that will rival the US and China? Or will it inevitably become just another failed Islamic totalitarian hellhole masquerading as a state.? If I were a guessing man, I’d have to guess the latter. Hence, how does another failed Islamic totalitarian state represent such a grave threat? And why are we so paranoid?

      • mollysdad

        The object of destroying the Caliphate is to demonstrate to camel piss drinkers that, if they wage holy war on Christians, Jews and the rest of the world, then they will be given a demonstration of why God set things up so that the conversion of a mass of fissile uranium will result in the uncontrolled release of energy according to the equation E = mc^2, where c is the velocity of light in a vacuum.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Man…you sounded like the father of Molly. Had I known that you were so mentally unstable, i never would have responded to you.

          • mollysdad

            Mentally unstable I’m not. But if I had the task of crushing a carpet-chewing nutjob like Caliph Ibrahim, I’d fight and kill so much like a nutjob that he’d be desperate to change his religion. No gloves, no quarter.

  • Guest

    At this point, I think it is clear that we Americans have been conned and suckered.

    I don’t like saying “conspiracy theory” but the results speak for themselves. If the government had secretly intended to get this result they could not have done better, and in fact every action of theirs over the past ten years matches what they would have done had there been an actual conspiracy to manipulate the ME situation such that an Islamic caliphate would be established.

    We originally went in to destroy the regime of a tyrant who had nothing to do with 9/11 on the basis of a potential threat of WMDs, which were never found, and as a result we destabilized the entire region and created a central battleground for global jihad.

    We then aided these same jihadis to destroy the Libyan government, which although also run by a dictator was at least providing stability to the region. So much so, that at the time we destroyed him he was attempting to create a central bank for Africa and had completed a series of water resovoirs for his country to allow greater farming and larger cities.

    In his case, we went so far as to provide air strikes for the al Qaida rebels when we saw they were losing.

    We quietly went on to attempt the same results on behalf of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt. Only in this case we subverted the government indirectly as Egypt had been a staunch ally for many decades now.

    We subsequently went on to arm and directly train jihadis in Jordan to attack Syria, after we removed our troops from Iraq they then took their lessons from the Syrian conflict and went on to completely overrun the Iraqi government. Note that even at this time, we have not provided air strikes on behalf of the desperate Iraqi government, despite the fact that they are a government we set up, and whose situation we are completely responsible for.

    As I said, our actions taken and the results directly created by those actions, speak for themselves.

    I do not know what the intentions of the US government are, but I believe there is some kind of plan, it is a plan that both the republican and the democratic administrations have been consistently following, and we are not being told what that plan is.

    • Madame_deFarge

      My POV on everything is: if you want to know what something or someone is all about merely look at the results they produce. Don’t listen to their words. Actions are all that counts here.

      • Battle_of_Tours

        This self proclaimed Kaliffa merely proves what had been often said, that Islam is a political force, not a religion. The fight against this regressive psychotic political force is now on a more level playing field. How will it end? Will the Uma take them seriously? Or is more war in store for the nations of “the religion of peace”? Stay tuned..

    • bleedinell

      You mean the WMD’s that didn’t exist, but were “found” by ISIS during their march across Iraq?
      There is a lot more going on in the war on terrorism than you know.

    • Wolfthatknowsall

      I don’t think that there’s a conspiracy or a “plan” at work, here. I think that it’s a fundamental failure to understand the threat that Islam, as a whole, poses to whatever freedom remains in the world. Because people didn’t fully understand that threat, they enacted policies that … unfortunately … made the situation worse.

      However, I will draw the line at Obama …

    • Pete

      The French and the Spanish supported the American Revolution.

      Thus the American Revolution had many fathers, the American people, The French and the Spanish.

      Likewise the Iranians (Shia) supported Al Qaeda (Sunni). they are odd bed fellows. Yet is it documented. Like wise the regime under Sadam and Al Qaeda are odd bed fellows. Iraq provided safe transit for Al Qaeda.

      What else did it provide? When an American embassy is under attack what do they do? Shred and burn documents. They would not do this in Iraq in 2003?

      Iraq provided training for different terrorists groups. Do we have documentation for all the groups that trained at Salman Pak? If we do not have documentation does that mean it did not happen?

      Obviously you do not know what training or assistance the Iraqi security services gave to Al Qaeda and other terrorists? You do not want to know and you will goto you grave (many years from now) not wanting to know.

    • Ellen_L

      Don’t ascribe as conspiracy what can be explained as stupidity or overlooked possibilities. These actions left a vacuum for opportunitistic power seeker but it required many stupid actions and the lack of a reasonable policy rather than an active conspiracy. The errors began over a century ago and have accelerated under our current administration. Good of you (the writer of the article and this comment) to remind or teach us some of the history that caused this mess.

  • steelraptor from Saturn

    The implications of this are staggering. And the world yawns. Oh there’s the World Cup, that’s where the focus is on, that’s what the infidels are glued to. Such a decadent and idiot escapist culture such as ours, is not at all prepared for the onslaught. Expect more appeasement and surrender from the West.

    A hundred years ago World War 1 began and the world was never the same. The clashes in the Marne in August 1914 awoke the dreaming fools of Europe to a bitter horror that they unleashed, yet their madness persisted. It persists to this day. We await our Marne.

    • James Lovelace

      One of the documentaries I saw on how WW 1 began stated that as the events which led to WW 1 unfolded, the European elites thought war was impossible, because the people of Europe were all now so sophisticated and civilised.

      The same attitude towards the future civil war in Europe seems to prevail again among the elite and the sheeple.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      The implications of this are staggering. And the world yawns.

      Why should the world not yawn? I mean what is a Caliphate anyway? It will inevitably be just another failed Islamic totalitarian state. It won’t be an economic powerhouse that’s for sure, and because Islamic totalitarian states are always weak and feeble by infidel state standards, it can’t possibly represent a staggering threat as you try to suggest.

      As a matter of fact, the jihadists that comprise ISIS aren’t any more or any less radical than the millions of Muslims that have already migrated to America for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest, and since several European countries, unless something drastic happens, will inevitably become Muslim majority countries in the second half of this century thanks to demographic conquest, it is obvious that mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage because it is jihad represents an exponentially far greater threat to the infidel world relative to ISIS, AQ, and an Islamic Caliphate.

      Hence, let the jihadists fight against themselves in the new Caliphate, and let’s ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP instead, because it is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest. Indeed, Muslim immigrants to the infidel world never ever assimilate and integrate, because to do so would entail them morphing into infidels, and morphing into an infidel is a capital offense in Islam.

      • Americana

        Much as I applaud your disgust at people advocating the use of nuclear weapons against ISIS, I have to differ w/you over your belief that millions of American Muslims are extremists or are here w/the absolute intention of dominating American life and making the U.S. an Islamic nation and instating shari’ah law over the U.S. Yes, there’s plenty of talk about conquering the U.S. but it’s grandiose talk. The likelihood of it happening, whether through the INFAMOUS STEALH JIHAD or by outright invasion is about ZIP for umpteen decades.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Hey Chester, I’m still waiting for you to send me some of that powerful stuff you have been smoking for the past 14 years. Again, my number is BR-549. Please send me some of that stuff ASAP as I can’t wait to get my hands on some of it.

          By the way Chester, a so-called moderate Muslim in the real world as opposed to the fantasy based one you choose to live in, is a blasphemous apostate in Islam, and the last time I checked, blasphemy and apostasy in Islam are capital offenses. Just thought you should know, as it is obvious that you have been smoking some of that powerful stuff for a long time.

          • http://www.chaverimisrael.org Norbert Haag

            I am sorry but I have to disagree. The French and Spanish supported the American revolution, maybe and to a degree. But, the fathers are the Americans. Like Tom and Frank support to get Lynn pregnant but Mike did it.
            Any more weak arguments?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I don’t make weak arguments.

          • Americana

            Says you, so modestly. OYM, who drew the infamously funny contrast earlier in another thread between “a worldwide Caliphate” and “waging worldwide jihad for Muslim supremacy.” DOH. I mean, really, DOH, there’s a difference between a worldwide Caliphate” and “worldwide Muslim supremacy?” “Honestly, there’s a difference between the two? And you say you’ve written a book???? I sure hope you had a great editor to help you w/the tough job of writing out coherent sentences on the complicated concepts.

          • http://www.chaverimisrael.org Norbert Haag

            While I agree with much, almost all that is, of your arguments, sometimes you make weak arguments. :)

            Nobody is perfect

          • ObamaYoMoma

            OK…what do you consider weak?

          • http://www.chaverimisrael.org Norbert Haag

            The idea that the French and Spanish are part of the founding fathers is misleading. But, anyway no reason to have a long discussion on this.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I hate to burst your bubble, but I didn’t write anything about the French and the Spanish being a part of our founding fathers. You got me confused with someone else. No wonder I thought your post was idiotic.

          • http://www.chaverimisrael.org Norbert Haag

            lol. sorry I pushed the wrong reply button and didn’t double check the conversation.

            Me bad.

            Cheers

          • Webb

            Isn’t it the squirts to have to put up with stinking effing faking liars like Chester/Americana? They’re too stupid to realize that their demonic spirits stick out like a sore thumb no matter how hard they try to disguise their writing styles. And their agenda is always the same — give the Pallies free land, and be nice to the rest of the filthy barbaric muslims. So they’re obvious muslims or sympathizers who persist at trying to dig out little inane points proving that muslims are worthy of life, when it’s so obvious that we need for them all to be dead so we can move on.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I agree and in the case of Americana, she is just obsessed with hating Jews.

          • johnnie the jew

            I’m on to this deluded bugwit and I want to intellectually lacerate him. He’s a freakin jellyfish who should be force fed Thomas Jefferson by way of a full frontal lobotomy if necessary, to remind him of his roots.Unless of course in the Bergdahl camp

          • Americana

            Must be the bugs in da machine renaming me because I only go by ‘Americana.’ Or it’s the renaming which is done by other posters, such as yourself, or even by the moderators, to subvert posters in particular ways. I’ll just bet your postS disappeared off the web site…Snooozzzeee

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            There IS a SW bug that seems to have cropped up in the last month or so. SOMETIMES the name of a poster is WRONG. You have to refresh ALL the messages to fix things.

        • mollysdad

          In a holy war there’s no principled distinction between conventional and nuclear weapons, as long as you use the least indiscriminate weapon that is consistent with the assured destruction of the enemy.

        • johnnie the jew

          Once born a muslim, always a muslim.You know the song – think Fort Hood – “i’m a muslim first, an American second” or similar. When you can turn university educated UK muslims into syria bound jihadists that easily it doesn’t take much imagination to join the next dot up. Their atavistic ideology rots what brains the educated ones have and very quickly it would seem. So, in response to your tepid reply i say they’re all much the same when push comes to shove. Great news today by the way, how the European High Court upheld Frances decision to ban the hideous head “scarf” (case i’m censored here). One tiny, albeit giant step, in the right direction. Do you think it’ll be that easy across the pond getting such an act past CAIR ?

        • johnnie the jew

          So, you’re going to leave it to future generations to clear the mess up. Wow. Whatever happened to the fighting, individualistic, highly creative, technologically advanced American culture and spirit??? Duped dingbat quasi dhimmi passive ( yeah, there’s that word again oh gormless one) BS. And you probably think you make America proud by some warped, pusillanimous means of a equality driven, “cultural” balancing act, middle of the ground seeking waste of time. Wake up and smell the sauce. Its time to get on board NOW and don’t gutlessly leave your future generations behind. Hope i’m not being too direct for you now. An astonished ANZAC/ True BRIT (run along and check those patriotic boys out from Downunder NOW on the Net. Tune into Charles Upham for starters !!) Peace.

        • aspacia

          Americana,
          Statistically millions of Muslims are extremist. Read what many claim.

          You fail to support your claims with any valid sources, hence, as I previously understood, you are a pseudointellectual.

  • Dyer’s Eve

    I agree that this threat should not be scoffed at and ridiculed. Nor should it be taken lightly. Once upon a time, people ridiculed and refused to take seriously a pathetic little sociopath called Adolf Hitler and look what happened.

    • BagLady

      Oh for goodness sake. Stop with your stupid scaremongering. The original version of Mein Kampf is on sale everywhere in the world and read extensively. A comic strip version is not something to get your knickers in a twist about now is it?

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        How about a comic strip version of the Koran?

        Ask Salman Rushdie about the chances of success with such a venture.

        • BagLady

          Ha, when 50 million people have a strip version of the Koran the problem fizzles. All you you have to do is find 50 million people to buy it.

          Salman Rushdie knew exactly what he was risking and has not done too badly, has he?

    • Miki Bacsi

      Well, I actually start to like Obama’s stupidity, which started all this
      BS in the Middle East. Right now muslim terrorists murder each other (,
      too) and I don’t think the end is nowhere near. Let them do it. And
      when they are done between sunnis and sunnis, start up one between
      sunnies and shi’its as well.

      https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/422752

      • BagLady

        Rwanda all over again.

  • Damaris Tighe

    Hitler admired Islam & got the idea to make Jews wear the yellow star from the caliphate, where Jews had to shave their heads & wear distinctive & humiliating clothing.

    • krinks

      Right. Mein Kampf in Arabic means “Jihad”. No coincidence.

      • Solo712

        Hassan al Bannah, the Muslim Brotherhood founder was an admirer of Hitler and later a spy for the Abwehr. The Brothers translated and published Mein Kampf as “My Jihad”.

        • claudineabelson

          My Uncle
          Joshua just got an almost new white Kia Rio Hatchback only from working
          part-time off a home computer. try this R­e­x­1­0­.­C­O­M­

          • Wolfthatknowsall

            Just go away …

        • BagLady

          ah so, krinks is wrong. Mein Kamf does not mean Jihad at all. Just a silly book translated by a bunch of silly men and given a silly name. Should that be the “Brothers” or the “bruvvers”?

      • BagLady

        The swastika is the Hindu symbol of peace but reversed. What a shame that such a powerful symbol should be rendered verboten because of one crazy megalomaniac.

        I shall go in search of your definition of Jihad since I have never heard of this interpretation and doesn’t ring true somehow.

        • krinks

          I am sorry but it is true. They both mean ‘my struggle’ . This is why Mein Kampf is the second most popular book in the Middle East after the Koran.

        • Damaris Tighe

          sorry BagLady, kampf means struggle as does jihad.

          • BagLady

            I have never argued with you on this. It is the definition of ‘struggle’ that is the argument.

            Moderate Muslims will assure you that it is the struggle of the soul trying to be a better person and I have seem plenty of proof of this desire amongst good men who, like in any other walk of life, spend their lives helping the less fortunate only stopping off at the mosque for a few minutes to pray for strength to keep up the good work.

            However, the moderates remain cowed by Sharia. They are afraid to rise up against the ‘terrorists’ lest they be labelled anti Muslim and face the ultimate penalty.

            What is your government doing about it? What is mine? Nothing at all is the answer. It suits them fine the way it is.

            Jeez. It’s understandable that sticking the wooden spoon in abroad to win wars is a weapon but at home?

            Must Americans be agitated to the point they blame their fellow Joe Ordinary for their failing lifestyles, just so corporations can make off with all the dosh?

    • BagLady

      and when the Taliban were, allegedly, making non-believing Afghans wear the yellow star back in the 90′s, the west ignored all the reports. Not until they destroyed the ancient Bamiyan temples did the west mumble and start to look at ‘the bigger picture’.

      • Damaris Tighe

        The west gets more excited about monuments than people.

        • BagLady

          So do I.

          We are mere cogs in a wheel being replaced all the time. I dread the thought that the Vatican City can be totally destroyed in one fell swoop and all the art of the greatest will be lost for all time. Every inch of beauty destroyed. A zillion pennies of the faithful, paying their way to heaven, gone in a puff of very expensive, western made smoke.

          If I were a ‘modernist’ artist, rubble would be the background of my work. Lots of blood and pain on the faces of people. Gloomy colours. The grey shades of depression splashed with the red of rage.

          You might blame Sharia for this regressive step but I see darker figures playing with the puppet strings. Keeping the moderates fearful and absent from media exposure suits our great leaders.

    • BagLady

      I mentioned elsewhere that the Taliban were making ‘non-believers’ wear yellow stars back in the ’90s in Afghanistan. I recall Indian newspapers warning constantly of the growing danger. I do not recall any response from the West.

  • CowboyUp

    It was clear after Egypt and Libya that the only way obama’s foreign policy made any sense is if reestablishing the caliphate under the muslim brotherhood was his primary objective. If I remember correctly, that is one of the MB’s founding objectives as well. To do so, obama had to undo everything Bush did, and he has nearly completed that.

    The idiots who think we can hide behind our borders and ignore them are in for a rude awakening. The jihadis themselves say they are coming no matter what, and the dp/left is going to great lengths to see that our country, especially the southern border, remains wide open.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      To do so, obama had to undo everything Bush did, and he has nearly completed that.

      Never mind the fact that what GWB did was incredibly fantasy based and preordained to fail even before it was ever implemented. I mean obviously Islam is not a so-called “religion of peace” and obviously the so-called “religion of peace” wasn’t being hijacked by another fantasy based creation of his called “radical Islam”.

      The reality is there is only one Islam, and that is mainstream orthodox Islam, and the sole fundamental purpose of mainstream orthodox Islam is the subjugation of all infidels and all religions into Islamic totalitarianism, i.e., harsh and degrading dhimmitude, through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, to ultimately make Islam supreme.

      Meanwhile, Islam is far more a very rabid form of totalitarianism than it is a so-called religion. Hence, the GWB objective to make the Islamic Middle East a bastion for democracy was exceedingly fantasy based and in fact impossible to say the least.

      Indeed, the only thing that GWB did besides throwing away trillions of taxpayer dollars, exploding the national debt, and getting thousands of brave American soldiers killed or maimed for nothing, was to create two Sharia States, with the one in Iraq being far more loyal to the Sharia state of Iran than to America. Not exactly worth getting more of our troops killed and maimed to protect.

      Meanwhile, rebuilding Islamic countries and lifting up Muslims, who are our eternal mortal enemies and also the eternal mortal enemies of all infidels around the world, was incredibly counterproductive.

      Indeed, even the name of GWB’s fantasy based war, the so-called “War on Terror”, was incredibly ludicrous because terrorism is not even an Islamic manifestation, as Muslims wage jihad as opposed to terrorism instead, which is a holy war waged against infidels in the cause of Allah both violently and non-violently to ultimately make Islam supreme. Meanwhile, his two fantasy based nation building missions inevitably turned into the two greatest strategic blunders ever in American history.

      Now I’m definitely not an Obama fan, never have been, never will be, but let’s not over inflate GWB’s accomplishments in his so-called “War on Terror”, as there weren’t any and that is not Obama’s fault, that’s the fault of GWB and the neocons.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      The idiots who think we can hide behind our borders and ignore them are in for a rude awakening. The jihadis themselves say they are coming no matter what, and the dp/left is going to great lengths to see that our country, especially the southern border, remains wide open.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      To do so, obama had to undo everything Bush did, and he has nearly completed that.

      Never mind the fact that what GWB did was incredibly fantasy based and preordained to fail even before it was ever implemented. I mean obviously Islam is not a so-called “religion of peace” and obviously the so-called “religion of peace” wasn’t being hijacked by another fantasy based creation of his called “radical Islam”.

      The reality is there is only one Islam, and that is mainstream orthodox Islam, and the sole fundamental purpose of mainstream orthodox Islam is the subjugation of all infidels and all religions into Islamic totalitarianism, i.e., harsh and degrading dhimmitude, through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, to ultimately make Islam supreme.

      Meanwhile, Islam is far more a very rabid form of totalitarianism than it is a so-called religion. Hence, the GWB objective to make the Islamic Middle East a bastion for democracy was exceedingly fantasy based and in fact impossible to say the least.

      Indeed, the only thing that GWB did besides throwing away trillions of taxpayer dollars, exploding the national debt, and getting thousands of brave American soldiers killed or maimed for nothing, was to create two Sharia States, with the one in Iraq being far more loyal to the Sharia state of Iran than to America. Not exactly worth getting more of our troops killed and maimed to protect.

      Meanwhile, rebuilding Islamic countries and lifting up Muslims, who are our eternal mortal enemies and also the eternal mortal enemies of all infidels around the world, was incredibly counterproductive.

      Indeed, even the name of GWB’s fantasy based war, the so-called “War on Terror”, was incredibly ludicrous because terrorism is not even an Islamic manifestation, as Muslims wage jihad as opposed to terrorism instead, which is a holy war waged against infidels in the cause of Allah both violently and non-violently to ultimately make Islam supreme. Meanwhile, his two fantasy based nation building missions inevitably turned into the two greatest strategic blunders ever in American history.

      Now I’m definitely not an Obama fan, never have been, never will be, but let’s not over inflate GWB’s accomplishments in his so-called “War on Terror”, as there weren’t any and that is not Obama’s fault, that’s the fault of GWB and the neocons.

      The idiots who think we can hide behind our borders and ignore them are in for a rude awakening. The jihadis themselves say they are coming no matter what, and the dp/left is going to great lengths to see that our country, especially the southern border, remains wide open.

      You sound like D. Cheney claiming that if we don’t hurry up and invade that economic powerhouse in Afghanistan that they are going to perpetrate more terrorist attacks against us.

      Meanwhile, how are they coming? Are they sailing here in their blue water navy? On their destroyers and carriers? Or are they going to fly long range bombing missions on B52s and B1 Bombers to bomb us? Exactly how do you figure they can harm us? Indeed, how about their economy, is it so dynamic that it will pass both the USA and China? Indeed, exactly what you mean when you say we can’t hide behind our borders.

      Moreover, Muslims don’t need to come through our southern border, when they can get in right through the front door. Did the 9/11 hijackers sneak in across our southern border? Or did they come in through the front door like all Muslims?

      By the way, the jihadists that comprise ISIS and AQ aren’t any more radical or any less radical than the millions of Muslims we already have living here in America for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest. Indeed, the Islamic totalitarian world relative to the infidel world is pathetically backwards and weak, and as such can never hope to defeat us through military force. However, through mass Muslim infiltration of our societies and eventual demographic conquest they most certainly can defeat us.

      As a matter of fact, unless something drastic happens, there are several European countries that will become Muslim majority countries via demographic conquest in the second half of this century. Thus, mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, because it is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest, represents an exponentially far greater threat than ISIS, AQ, and a Caliphate combined. Thus, if we know what’s good for us, we will ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP.

      • Jason Vickers

        Good try blaming Bush. We had more peace in the middle east than anytime in history until Obama announced he was quitting the wars and gave dates of us leaving. Only then did they begin to be more bold and take advantage of the situation. Get a grip. Bush is not responsible. He made mistakes but Obama effed up on purpose to further this caliphate and he’s in on the gig. FACT.

      • Miki Bacsi

        Islam is not a religion. You can ask any Muslim about this, and he’s
        going to say Islam is a way of life. And this is probably the last true
        thing you will hear from his mouth.
        By looking at the constant infighting among these savages, and the way they murder “infidels” it would be hard to say that Islam is a peaceful way of life. It will be peaceful only when one Muslim remains on this planet. Hopefully he will agree with himself in every respect.

        https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/422752

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Islam is a rabid form of totalitarianism more than it is anything else, and in totalitarian environments people have no other choice but to conform. In the Soviet Communist Russia those that refused to conform were sent to the gulags. In Islam they are simply executed.

    • BagLady

      So what you are saying is that Obama has failed in his foreign policy for Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood are in prison, as are various media reporters and thousands of voters.

      I see that Tony Blair has put himself forward as an ‘advise’r to Sisi (free of charge of course) and what will emerge will be a clone of Mubarak. The rich don’t let go of the helm so easily and neither does the west. Such a shame for all those well educated young Egyptians who were so looking forward to a taste of democracy.

      • Drakken

        The muslim world will never live in a democracy, they are either under the boot of a General or a mullah, always better to have General in charge, as least they are semi-practical.

        • BagLady

          Looking back at the recent history of your southern neighbours I can see this North American philosophy that you ascribe to.

          Little countries, daring to raise their hungry heads above the parapet of oppression and escape their despotic rulers’ corruption were systematically shot down and labelled ‘commies’ to justify the atrocities to the American people. Please don’t make me list them.

          All this came under the heading: ‘trade’.

      • CowboyUp

        Yes, the obama administration failed in their objective in Egypt. They supported morsi, even after it became clear where he was taking Egypt, and punished Egypt when he was booted. The muslim brotherhood haven’t given up on Egypt, of course, but they and the democrat party are thwarted there for now. A clone of mubarak is preferable to a morsi or a muslim brotherhood clone any day.

        It took more than “the rich” to boot morsi, and it was clear by then that those “well educated young Egyptians,” weren’t going to get more than a taste of democracy anyway under the muslim brotherhood. Before US friendly dictators are booted, acceptable alternative political groups must exist and be developed enough to maintain stability and economic growth. Otherwise the world gets Irans, Cubas, or North Koreas, instead of South Koreas.

        • BagLady

          A clone of mubarak is preferable to a morsi or a muslim brotherhood clone any day.”

          Then that is very sad for your average, well educated Egyptian. It means they will have to start the Arab Spring all over again, which is what they promised if Mubarak or hardline Islamists took the helm.

          They seem to be asking for very little. No more than you and I demand of our governments. Infrastructure. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • Harry_the_Horrible

    I am kinda happy about this.
    First we have been warning folks about this.
    Second, a Sunni Caliphate will polarize Islam – for or against. Any Caliph who is not a (provable) descendant of Mohammed is not going to be acceptable to the Shia.
    With a little luck we’ll be able encourage both sides to genocidal fury and finish off whatever is left.

    • Madame_deFarge

      Harry, I think the Sunni’s are the minority here. I don’t know whether it matters since both want our destruction.

      • Harry_the_Horrible

        Sunnis are the minority in Iraq while Shia are majority in both Iraq and Iran. This is why I rather hope Iran will intervene against in Iraq against ISIS.
        However, Sunnis are majorities in Syria and, IIRC most of the Gulf States, esp. Saudi Arabia, and in hell-holes like Pakistan and Afghanistan. They are also a majority in Turkey. In fact, I think they are majority in Islam overall.
        Yes, they both hate us, but the good news, is that they hate each other as much or more. And a Sunni Caliphate is going to PO Shia unless they can find a “descendant of Mohammed.”
        Then, there is the issue of accessibility: they can get at each other much easier than they can get at us.
        I think the plan should be encourage whichever side is flagging with money and arms, prevent refugees from reaching the West, and pop popcorn.

  • RAM500

    Just what the Arabs need, a 21st Century Fuehrer.

  • Hard Little Machine

    Just another band of psychotic Muslims carving out a mass grave and calling it a ‘state’. So what? The only difference is that unlike Boko Haram, Hezbollah, or those guys in Mali, this one bleeds across internationally recognized national map lines.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The restoration of the caliphate has for decades been the central goal of jihad groups worldwide.

    I don’t know if it is their central goal or not, as the ultimate goal of jihad is to make Islam supreme throughout the world via jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law. Creating a caliphate is just a stepping stone on the path to achieving supremacy.

    Not to mention, what is a caliphate? All it is in reality is just another inevitable dysfunctional Islamic totalitarian state. It’s destined to be just another failed Islamic totalitarian hellhole, and as such, it hardly represents much of threat to the infidel world. Indeed, the Islamic totalitarian world relative to the Christian-Judeo infidel world is incredibly backwards, and as such can hardly ever hope to defeat us via military force.

    Not to mention, that the jihadists that comprise ISIS aren’t any more or any less radical than the millions of Muslims that have already migrated to America for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest. However, because several European countries, unless something very drastic happens, will become Muslim majority countries in the second half of this century through demographic conquest, Muslims can most certainly defeat us through mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest. As a matter of fact, Muslim immigrants never ever assimilate and integrate in infidel societies, as that would entail them morphing into infidels, and morphing into infidels in Islam is a capital offense.

    Indeed, mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, because it is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest, represents an astronomically far greater threat for the infidel world compared to ISIS, AQ, and a caliphate. Ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP, and waging jihad, either violently or non-violently, in America becomes literally impossible.

    • Americana

      If the millions of Muslims inside the U.S. were all that pro-jihad, we’d have far more American Muslims leaving the U.S. for jihad or figuring out ways to commit jihad actions within the U.S. Even the Boston bombers, the Tsarnaev brothers, were initially thinking of committing themselves to the Palestinian jihad but Tamerlan Tsarnaev was scared off by the language barrier and consequently decided to remain in the U.S. I’d say we’ve been remarkably lucky in keeping American Muslims within our fold even though there have been terrible instances like the case of Major Nidal Hasan where extremist Muslim views were allowed to fester until they exploded.

      Sometimes, in fact, most often, immigration is just that — it’s just straightforward immigration. Muslims who are fleeing from famine, from dysfunctional countries suffering internecine warfare, from backward countries, the multitude of reasons are not rooted in stealth jihad. To pretend that stealth jihad is what is happening is to miss the strategic realities of the world’s regions and the shifting population demographics of flight from untenable conditions. We may wish to guard against maximal Muslim immigration, but neither our government has not fostered Muslim immigration in order to facilitate stealth jihad.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        If the millions of Muslims inside the U.S. were all that pro-jihad, we’d have far more American Muslims leaving the U.S. for jihad or figuring out ways to commit jihad actions within the U.S.

        Apparently, you don’t understand the nuances of jihad. Not only that, but you must also believe that all Muslims are like mindless Neanderthals. Nonetheless, unlike terrorism, which is always and only violent, jihad, on the other hand, manifest both violently and non-violently and, indeed, by any means at their disposal.

        Muslims aren’t Neanderthals addicted to murdering infidels violently only. In fact, astronomically far more jihad is waged today throughout the world non-violently by stealth and deception relative to jihad waged violently, and because so many people have been misled to believe that our biggest threat emanating from Islam is from terrorism, which is not even an Islamic manifestation, most people like you are completely oblivious to the many forms of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad being waged against us every day in this country and right under your infidel nose by Muslim immigrants that are also stealth jihadists. As Muslim immigrants never ever assimilate and integrate in infidel societies, because that would entail them morphing into infidels, and morphing into infidels is a capital offense in Islam.

        Here you go, open your eyes:

        During the course of the HLF trial, many incriminating documents were entered into evidence. Perhaps the most significant of these was “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” by the Muslim Brotherhood operative Mohamed Akram. Federal investigators found Akram’s memo in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search. Elbarasse was a member of the Palestine Committee, which the Muslim Brotherhood had created to support Hamas in the United States.

        Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram’s 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

        Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims’ efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram’s document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”

        http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1235

        I’d say we’ve been remarkably lucky in keeping American Muslims within our fold even though there have been terrible instances like the case of Major Nidal Hasan where extremist Muslim views were allowed to fester until they exploded.

        You apparently believed that idiot GWB when he proclaimed right after 9/11 that Islam is a so-called “religion of peace” and that with the exception of only a tiny minority of radical Muslim extremists who also resort to terrorism, the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world are so-called moderates and peaceful people just like adherents of other peace loving religions.

        Well I hate to be the one that has to rain on your incredibly naïve and gullible parade, but nonetheless waging jihad in the cause of Allah against infidels to ultimately make Islam supreme throughout the world in one form or another, either violently or non-violently, is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims, and because Islam is a so-called religion that executes all apostates and all blasphemers, all mainstream orthodox Muslims in the world are jihadists in one form or another as opposed to just extremists and radicals, either violent as in AQ, or non-violent as in the millions of Muslims that have migrated to America for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest. Otherwise, they are executed for apostasy and blasphemy per the dictates of Islam.

        Sometimes, in fact, most often, immigration is just that — it’s just straightforward immigration. Muslims who are fleeing from famine, from dysfunctional countries suffering internecine warfare, from backward countries, the multitude of reasons are not rooted in stealth jihad.

        Yeah right, and the moon is made of cheese too. Not to mention that I bet you can’t point to just one population of Muslim immigrants anywhere in the entire infidel world that have actually assimilated and integrated as opposed to forming first Muslim enclaves that in time inevitably morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia that are in effect tiny Islamic statelets within the larger host infidel state. As a matter of fact, Europe is littered with thousands of these Muslim no-go zones as I type, and, indeed, several European countries will also become Muslim majority countries thanks to demographic conquest in the second half of this century. Hence, what cocoon have you been living in for the past almost 14 years?

        In any event, whatever you must be smoking for the past 14 years is obviously quite good. Hence, could you pretty please text me some, my number is BR-549. And thanks in advance.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Looky here, it’s Americana again. What happened to ole Chester? Let me go check the last one to see if it too somehow morphed into Americana too.

        • Paul of Alexandria

          But he’s right.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            But she’s right is what you mean. Nevertheless, you are either Americana posting under another false name, or with all due disrespect, you are a flake exactly like she is.

          • Paul of Alexandria

            Neither.
            Actually, though, the message got misfiled. I was talking to _her_ about _you_. Somehow the response got posted under your’s.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Website SW bug.

      • Drakken

        Hmmm funny thing about all that wishful wrongheaded thinking. There are at last count over 100 somali skinnies from MN currently on jihad in Africa and the ME, so your whole premise is utter bullsh*t. Islam is islam no mater the stripe and where ever islam goes, the blood always flows, without exception. So here you are espousing peacenik leftist stupidity in the vain hope that you might survive, hilarious!

        • Americana

          Nope, not BS based on the numbers. I said there would be umpteen thousands, if not millions, of Muslims who would be joining these jihads and running for jihad hotspots if there was all that much enthusiasm for jihad within the vast majority of Muslims. 100 assorted Muslims coming from Minnesota doesn’t make for an overwhelming response to the call for jihad. Sorry to burst your bubble, Drakken.

    • Americana

      OYM, don’t you even realize there’s no difference between achieving the worldwide Caliphate and participating in jihad in order to achieve total worldwide Muslim supremacy? DOH, dhimmi.

      You criticize this wording >>>>> “The restoration of the caliphate has for decades been the central goal of jihad groups worldwide.”

      In order to split hairs by writing this comment of yours as if they are two fundamentally different things You must not understand anything about Caliphates. They can be of ANY SIZE and SWALLOW ANY NUMBER OF NATIONS and, consequently, “bringing the world under a worldwide Caliphate” would be the same thing as bringing the world entirely under Islamic domination. Better get a clue, OYM. You look pretty weird and foolish w/this following statement of yours since you’re playing at anti-jihad as hard as you are >>>>>>> (OYM) “I don’t know if it is their central goal or not, as the ultimate goal of jihad is to make Islam supreme throughout the world via jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law. Creating a caliphate is just a stepping stone on the path to achieving supremacy.”

  • Walter Sieruk

    The Bible’s curse in on this wicked and murderous man ,Abu Bakr al Baghdadi with all his violence. For the Bible reads in Psalm 140:11. “May disaster hunt down men of violence.” For Baghdad it will a disaster that is coming to him. Sooner or later it just a matter of time before it all comes back on him. As in “What goes around comes around.” Like the Bible teaches “A man reaps what he sows.” Galatians 6:7. As for the deadly, evil and mad members of the Islamic militant force ISIS. They are described, in part, in the Bible. For in the Bible book of Ecclesiastes 9:3. it reads ” “The hearts o fmen are full of evil and their is madness in their hearts while they live, and afterwards they join the dead.” [N.I.V.]

  • Chestertonrocks

    There are five main things that a Muslim must believe in to be righteous: Allah, the Quran, the Last Day, the Angels and the Prophets. Sura 2:177. Belief in the Last Day includes various Major and Minor signs, the restoration of the Caliphate under al-Mahdi who will be a direct descendant of Mohammed and share his name (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 36, Number 4271), the return of Jesus (Isa) who will initiate a world-wide slaughter of Jews and Christians (Muslim Book 041, Number 7015), and the defeat of the Muslim Anti-Christ figure, the Dajjal (also Muslim Book 041, Number 7015).

    Righteous Muslims must believe in these things and many apparently are working to try to make them happen. Reestablishment of the Caliphate is central to Islam and is not a side issue, as this is a precursor to the ultimate destruction of Israel and attainment of worldwide supremacy of Islam, according to Islamic theology. I agree with Robert, this is an immensely significant development and one which we ignore at our own peril.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Actually, you accidentally left out the sixth and most important pillar of Islam, which is Jihad or holy fighting, and waging jihad in the cause of Allah against infidels to ultimately make Islam supreme is a fundamental holy obligation for every Muslim on earth!

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Oh…there you are. I found it, but it is still under ole Chester’s name instead of Americana. One of these days you will have to teach us how to do multiple identities on Discus. That looks like fun.

      • Americana

        Nope. I’m only and always ‘Americana.’ You can keep your Chesteronrocks identity if you like it though. Oh, FYI, as long as you’re smoking rock cocaine, just be aware your brainwaves aren’t always as sharp as you think you are when you think you’re smokin’ HOT, it’s likely you’re NOT. I did register my pen name so it’s no longer possible for someone here to co-opt the name. That must be why you invented the ‘Chestertonrocks’ identikit.

  • Lysander Spooner

    If he were not a crack-loving alleged closet homosexual whose freaky-deaky man-stained poem “Pop” has to be considered corruption-on-earth, that obama would make one dandy caliph.

  • krinks

    This is the sick joke that is “Progressive Christianity”. They love and admire Muslims more than real, actual Christians that read and follow their Bibles. In the end they will get their throats cut along with everyone else and they helped to make it possible.

  • Watcher 87

    CalipHATE!

  • delm31_nabla@yahoo.com

    Allahu Akbar!

    • johnnie the jew

      Numb nuts, numb nuts, just a load of old saggy sand boy inferiority complexes all raging with nowhere to go but the loaded rucksack and vest. Don’t you wished you grew up with movies, V8s, motorbikes, bikinis, beer,blues, jazz and rock and roll. It’s understandable how envious you must feel not having anything remotely constituting a culture. You have to wait until you get to paradise for all this. We do it in the here and now wombat. Name just one of your scientists, philosophers, psychologists, chemists or biologists in the last 100 years and i’ll shout you a halah certified bacon sannie

    • Drakken

      Deo Volente!

  • delm31_nabla@yahoo.com

    Happy Ramadan!

    • johnnie the jew

      So, whats your point here ? Are you part of the problem or part of the solution ??

    • johnnie the jew

      you aint quick enough of the draw to win this one. If you’re part of the problem then i’de give up now flatfoot. you’ve got 20 minutes to get my attention whilst i munch on another spare rib and have a beer

    • johnnie the jew

      Loser tosspot. I told ya so but you guys just don’t have the critical (western!!!) intellectual faculty for listening or thinking. History solidly proves it. What a bog brained trog

    • Drakken

      God Bless the Crusades!

  • Paul of Alexandria

    The question is, then: what relationship will/do Iran and the Saudis (respectively the most pro-active of the Islamic states and the one that controls most of the Islamic holy sites) have with the Islamic State?

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Uhm…that’s not obvious?

    • johnnie the jew

      Get a copy of John Barrett Kellys’ – ‘The Oil Cringe of The West’ immediately and get up to speed. He tells it better than anyone about the tribal differences, politics and various western/russian/religious dynamics of the Middle East. You won’t be disappointed. Trust me. Johnnie knows these things.

  • johnnie the jew

    where’s bigmouth americana? I’m not staying upall night waiting – Greenwich Meantime prevails here across the pond. And i’ve got an early start in a very, very busy office tomorrow. So, lets have ya. I aint no saint so patience dont work for me. No time for dilly dallying boy, pistols at dawn. I’ve tried to be gentlemanly and polite by responding to your postings, so its only fair in a very truly English way, to expect some manners in return. Or,are you just some kind of mischievous,only slightly, irritating troll ?? Give you another 30 minutes,or else

    • johnnie the jew

      It must be difficult being androgenous americana. Not knowing when to muscle up or go all peacenik namby pamby. Have you been to then gym lately and not just for a latte and sauna.Oh no, no,no. I suggest 10 1 minute rounds, bare knuckle on the punch bag. Then the same again on the kick bag. Then a couple of cool and cold ones. Return home and watch some German vidoes,if you know what I mean? Reality just might strike a distant chord

    • Drakken

      Americana is a woman.

  • Jason Vickers

    This seeds were set by Obama during the Arab spring. Totally his doing an dream. He has said as much that he would stand with Islam. And he is doing just that. This is a game to him and he’s winning. What will you do?

  • Roha Waha

    I suspected from the beginning that the attack on Iraq was not to conquer the whole country, but to obtain the weapons to finish the job in Syria and put an Islamic state on Israels border The deceleration of a Caliphate is a disaster for
    the West. Every Muslim world wide is mandated by Islam to support financially
    and to physically defend it. The money,weapons and jihad’st will pour in, and Russia will be happy to sell them weapons to destabilize middle east oil to raise their own oil prices. they will not attack Israel right away. They will first expand the Caliphate.

  • BagLady

    “….The Islamic State, and named its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the
    caliph, and demanded that all Muslims worldwide pledge allegiance to him.”

    Big deal. He looks like someone who escaped from one of Britain’s ‘open prisons’. You know, those hostels that cost more than a 5 * on the beach in Rio, where the inmates are free to come and go as they please, murdering and raping on their days out with the police clueless as to their whereabouts.

    Must we really be persuaded by the media that these small-fry are a threat to our existence? A drone could take him out in an instant if the US had a mind to do so.

    Oh how we love our enemies. Bring em on. There’s a bounty on every head boys. $1 per head for the killer and $1000 for us the investors. Do you know the price of a bomb? Jeez, $1million gone in a puff of smoke and the damned thing missed.

  • BagLady

    “Caliphate restored” my bottom.

    Abu-Bakr al Baghadi. Sounds important, like Count Alphonso-del-Feugo-del-Cassablanca. He can swagger and get fat for a while before his death but he can’t be the Caliph.

    It’s bullshit. The fat idiot has grabbed the microphone and a million others will fight to take it from him.

    Replacing the Caliph will be as troublesome as accepting a new Jesus in our midst.

    The whole cause is doomed and the country will implode with the violence.

    I repeat: Rwanda all over again.