UK: Child Sex Exploitation Now the ‘Norm’

UKMuslimrapegangThe UK’s Guardian reported Wednesday that “sexual exploitation of vulnerable children has become the social norm in some parts of Greater Manchester,” and the denial and obfuscation about what is really causing this problem is thicker than ever.

In the very same sentence in which it broke this terrible news, the Guardian stated that this phenomenon is “fuelled by explicit music videos and quasi-pornographic selfies, an MP has warned.” The MP in question, former social worker Ann Coffey, has issued a report on the sexual exploitation of children in Britain that she said would “make painful reading for those who hoped that Rochdale was an isolated case.”

It was in Rochdale that a group of Muslims were involved in a large-scale sex trafficking ring involving young non-Muslim girls. Coffey is right: there is already abundant evidence that it was not an isolated case, as 1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in the British city of Rotherham alone, and there are numerous other documented cases in Britain of Muslim sex trafficking and rape gangs, of which the victims were non-Muslim girls.

Why has this been happening, and on such a massive scale? According to the Guardian, it’s all because social workers and others in positions of authority just don’t like troubled young people: “Coffey said police, social workers, prosecutors and juries are often inherently (albeit unconsciously) prejudiced against vulnerable teenagers – perhaps explaining why, out of 13,000 reported cases of major sexual offences against under-16s in the past six years in Greater Manchester, there have been only 1,000 convictions.”

Social workers, prosecutors, and juries are inherently prejudiced against vulnerable teenagers? With that, Coffey could win the prize for the most preposterous evasion offered this year to try to exonerate Islamic doctrine from responsibility for the evils done by those who act upon that doctrine – although she will, as in every year, face stiff competition.

In reality, social workers are not prejudiced against vulnerable teenagers; they’ve dedicated their lives to aiding people such as vulnerable teenagers. No, what social workers, in the U.S. as well as in Britain, are prejudiced against is being called “racist.” In Rotherham, British officials “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

And what were the ethnic origins of those perpetrators? Wednesday’s Guardian report doesn’t mention it (which in itself is telling), but 75%, and probably more (since it is so politically unacceptable to report such things) of these rape and sexual exploitation gangs are “Asian,” which is British Newspeak for “Muslim.” Despite the continuing horror of these revelations, the British continue to take all this with equanimity, for to resist it would be “racist” and “Islamophobic.”

If Ann Coffey and others who are horrified at these rape gangs and the exploitation of children really want to stop this practice, sooner or later they are going to have to stop kidding themselves and their supporters, and confront the politically correct elites who hurl such charges at anyone who ventures any criticism of Islam and Muslims. For the unpleasant truth is that these rape gangs have become “the norm” in all too many cities in Britain because Muslims are taking seriously material from the Qur’an and Sunnah that justifies those practices.

According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general, as does this passage. “Certainly will the believers have succeeded: They who are during their prayer humbly submissive, and they who turn away from ill speech, and they who are observant of zakah, and they who guard their private parts except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed” (Qur’an 23:1-6).

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)

The twentieth-century Qur’an commentator Maulana Bulandshahri explains the wisdom of this practice, and longs for the good old days when Muslims took sex slaves (days that appear now to have returned):

During Jihad (religion war), many men and women become war captives. The Amirul Mu’minin [leader of the believers, or caliph -- an office now vacant] has the choice of distributing them amongst the Mujahidin [warriors of jihad], in which event they will become the property of these Mujahidin. This enslavement is the penalty for disbelief (kufr).

He goes on to explain that this is not ancient history:

None of the injunctions pertaining to slavery have been abrogated in the Shari’ah. The reason that the Muslims of today do not have slaves is because they do not engage in Jihad (religion war). Their wars are fought by the instruction of the disbelievers (kuffar) and are halted by the same felons. The Muslim [sic] have been shackled by such treaties of the disbelievers (kuffar) whereby they cannot enslave anyone in the event of a war. Muslims have been denied a great boon whereby every home could have had a slave. May Allah grant the Muslims the ability to escape the tentacles of the enemy, remain steadfast upon the Din (religion) and engage in Jihad (religion war) according to the injunctions of Shari’ah. Amen!

This is by no means an eccentric or unorthodox view in Islam. The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that as they waged jihad warfare against infidels, Muslims would take slaves. He clarified what he meant in a subsequent interview:

…Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is no disagreement from any of them. [...] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Right around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti activist and politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

…A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up (this man’s) situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not–she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

While the savage exploitation of girls and young women is an unfortunately cross-cultural phenomenon, only in Islamic law does it carry anything approaching divine sanction. Here is yet another human rights scandal occasioned by Islamic law that the international human rights community and the mainstream media cravenly ignore. And even when the devastation that this practice has caused is staring them in the face, British officials tell themselves and the public that it’s all because social workers don’t like teenagers.

As Britain descends into madness, we can only hope its demise will serve as a cautionary tale for other countries in the West.

*

Don’t miss The Glazov Gang’s special 2-part series on Muslim Rape Gangs in the UK:

Part I:

Part II:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Paul Austin Murphy

    There are four usages of the words ‘Pakistani’ and five of ‘Asian’ in Ann Coffey’s 75-page report; though everyone one of them tells us that it is problematic or simply wrong to think in these terms.

    Put simply, Ann Coffey (a Labour Party MP) is continuing to make the political and ideological mistakes which were highlighted in the previous report on Rotherham.

    Here’s a report in Brenner Brief: ‘Ann Coffey’s report on Muslim sex-grooming gangs doesn’t use the word ‘Muslim’ once’

    http://www.brennerbrief.com/ann-coffeys-report-on-muslim-sex-grooming-gangs-doesnt-use-the-word-muslim/

  • Harley Sims

    Devout Muslims just following the Quran? Really now. Check out Wiki Islam for an eye-opening report on what is left out of the article here:

    http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Pornography

    Somehow I don’t think Mo would approve just like the “devout” Muslims also partaking of the same alcohol and cocaine that they plied the 11 to 14 year-old white girls with.

    • Cecil Broomsted

      Nobody wants to talk about the truth in these cases which are happening all over Europe. It is just as taboo to speak about here in the US as it is in the UK. Those young white girls were racially targeted by adult Pakistani men. We don’t want to say that but it is true. Islam, vile religion that it is, was not the motivating factor here.

      • Paul Austin Murphy

        “Those young white girls were racially targeted by adult Pakistani men. We don’t want to say that but it is true. Islam, vile religion that it is, was not the motivating factor here.”

        No one is claiming that Islam is the ONLY motivation for what has happened in the UK. However, since even the Guardian acknowledges that 75% (Muslims are around 4% of the general population) of sex-groomers have been Muslim, then it’s a safe bet to say that Islam is the prime aspect of it all.

        Race may be an aspect too; though only in the rudimentary sense that white skin symbolises kuffarhood – and for obvious reasons.

        In the UK, Sikhs and Hindus have also been targeted by Muslims. So it’s not only people with white skin; though white skin, as I said, symbolises “the Other” (as post-structuralists have it) to many Muslims.

        • Sheik Yerbouti

          It has become natural for people to jump to the race aspect of things. It was done to whites for decades with the aim of demoralizing an entire race. Rather successfully it seems. It’s clear we have traitors to deal with in many nations.

      • John Pallyswine

        PERFIDIOUS ALBION is even perfidious to fell Brits. What a reason to ban all ANGLO immigration to America. Best to direct them to Canada so America can protect itself

    • UncleVladdi

      Unfortunately wrong: Moe said all deception, including eating pork and drinking wine, is halal if and when used to advance islam and destroy infidels.

    • Ginger Li

      Spencer has already made it quite clear. Islam requires no behavioral restraint when it is subjectively conducted in furtherance of the jihad against infidels. The influx of Muslims into a western society is every bit a pandemic the spread of a disease like ebola would be – and both, ridiculously according to the tenets of PC, have civil rights!

  • Gee

    No wonder the Eurotrash consider us racist – we shoot back.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      And Eurotrash are the Eloi to the Muslim Morlocks.

  • cree

    Because we have not seen or the press there is suppressing parents’ attempts to retaliate reveals the submission to the muslims and to their appeasers (the Brits are subjugated by their own government, forcing parents to trade Islamophobia for their children). How can the parents effectively fight back? It also reveals the success of stealth jihad. Are we witness to the beginning stages of a second Islamic conquest of Europe? An extraordinary conclusion?

    This kind of reality is why our founders gave us the 2nd amendment; a reality that would give Brit, etc. parents’ their justice, since their governments’ have not.

  • http://geoffreybritain.wordpress.com/ Geoffrey_Britain

    “The grandchild, far from being incidental, is decisive. Civilization persists when there is a widespread sense of an ethical obligation on the part of the present generation for the well-being of the third generation —their own grandchildren. A society where this feeling is not widespread may last as a civilization for some time—indeed, for one or two generations it might thrive spectacularly. But
    inevitably, a society acknowledging no transgenerational commitment to the future will decay and decline from within.—Lee Harris, “The Future of Tradition”

    Stick a fork in the UK, they’re done, we’re just waiting for the fat lady to sing.

    a popular T-shirt worn by Muslim youth in Stockholm reads:
    “2030 – That’s When We Take Over.”

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      Today it’s 2029 in Sweden

  • PhillipGaley

    In a clearer form of the 2nd to the last paragraph, “. . . . only in Islamic law does the savage exploitation of girls and young women bear forward in anything approaching divine sanction.”, what we here read is but another example of a myopic perception which thus far has allowed the Moslems to safely pass “under the radar”, leaving most people to assume Islam to be just another religion.
    Much to the contrary, I subscribe the statements of those who say, if it looks like a criminal ideology, if it acts like a criminal ideology, if what it leaves in its wake is that of a criminal ideology, if it predicates its goals as do criminal ideologies, and so forth, probably, except in say-so-only, it’s not to be taken as any kind of religion, but rather, as a criminal ideology.
    The learned author’s: “carry anything approaching divine sanction.” in description of the Sharia’s edicts concerning sex-slaves, is a worst sort of set-aside of the principal point of logic; for, than say, the unconverted minister in a Church, in the accounts of such, the out-and-out profligate is more likely to attain his soul’s salvation; or, than most any know-it-all, any useful sense of humility is more likely to put one in position to learn; or, as we have of many rags-to-riches-to-rags stories, than he who has little or know sense of the fleet movement of riches, the one in rags is ever so much more likely to understand what counting nickels and dimes is all about.
    As appears to my mind, not in any way, shape, nor form are imams’ ideas about sex-slaves, to be even mentioned as approaching anything of the divine, . . . And again, regarding this nation’s peaceful dealing with the barbarous peoples, our’s is the first time in known history that, the dominant power has failed to check the savage influence—and I would say, with suffering of a fitting punishment to follow, . . . nothing harsh, but appropriate, only, . . . here’s hoping that, the responsible parties won’t all be dead.

  • iluvisrael

    the mug shots of the feral chimps would look great on an NRA poster.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      And target.

  • Hank Rearden

    Excuse me, but why does anyone in Britain give a sh*t about what is in Sharia law? I believe in the board game Monopoly. Does that mean I can go to Britain and if I get convicted of something, use a Get Out of Jail Free card and walk?

    What has happened to the Brits?

  • herb benty

    Socialism has now removed the British SPINE. Where is the British Lion? These are your little girls, lads.

    • Ginger Li

      The UK is being PC’d to death, and the US isn’t far behind.

      • Original Prankster

        Difference here in the US is that we are armed – can’t wait for the war – I’ve been stocking up on ammo

      • herb benty

        Orwell was right about the power of PC….weird how the Right read it as a warning, while the Left read it as a Playbook!

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      herb benty AKBAR!

      • herb benty

        Christians around the world have shown that they are not murderers, as the Lord commanded. Defending against paganism is right.

  • danhoch

    So when is the U.K. going to wake up and kick them all out of their country? I can’t believe even the Queen would be allowing this, to the little girls, the U.K. needs to remove the vermin from their country, they can not co-exist with the kind of country the U.K. and the U.S. is. They need to go back to the Middle East and tear each other apart down there, and leave us “heathens” alone.

    • http://www.drbukk.com/ Nancy Albert

      They could start with DNA files on every family on welfare. Throw out the polygamists, because it’s against the law. How many of the children are being double-claimed or more for benefits? How many inbred babies are abandoned to social care? You could trace the cousin-marrying parents and expel them and their families too.

      • Original Prankster

        You can’t kick all the inbreds out of the UK – there would only be 12 people left

    • UncleVladdi

      The Queen regularly knights muslim infiltraitors for the House of Lords.

      Then there’s her son, Dhimmi Prince Chuckie, always pandering to them.

  • kbech

    Anything to justify the evil they do. If it weren’t the Koran, it would be something else. Hitler did it, and the Muslims do it, and it is wrong.

  • seewithyourowneyes

    The truth, the truth, the truth. Keep telling it, Robert Spencer.

  • UncleVladdi

    Ah, just more “cultural enrichment” from those peaceful “Asians,” right, Camoron?

  • Jacob Peters

    Boy loving catholic priests should be lumped together with the rest of the trash.

    • Sprickoló Tömegek

      Nah, they know they are sinners. These don’t.

  • Edward_Teach

    How has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to these people? Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in, their country will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.

  • RonHess

    White Britons, make these social workers so afraid of YOU that they forget about being called “racists.” Honestly, to just slit your own throats as a people because some foreigners or some anti-white communist on the BBC called you a name? I would rather DIE than give in to that! The real problem is the thought crime legislators in councils and parliament. They are traitors, every last one of them, and they deserve to be hanged, drawn, and quartered for it. They are murdering your nation, and you’re letting them.

  • White

    Canada is 64% Racist and 36% Diverse.
    Australia is 69% Racist and 31% Diverse.
    Europe is 82% Racist and 18% Diverse.
    The U.S. is 62% Racist and 38% Diverse.

    END RACISM NOW!!!
    WE NEED MORE DIVERSITY!!!

    - Anti-racist logic

    “Diversity” means chasing down the last white person.
    It’s White Genocide.
    “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.