The ‘Cycle of Violence’ Fantasy in the Middle East

19366_1Ernst Eduard vom Rath was a German diplomat representing the Third Reich in Paris in 1938.  In November of that year he was shot and mortally wounded by a 17-year-old Polish Jewish youth, HerschelGrynszpan, who had been living in Germany.  Vom Rath was 29 years old.  Ironically, vom Rath had earlier expressed anti-Nazi sympathies, evidently based on the Nazi treatment of Jews, and was under Gestapo investigation at the time for being politically unreliable.  He died of his wounds two days after being shot.  Hitler used the assassination as an excuse to launch Kristallnacht, a pogrom against German Jews, shortly after the death.   My father attended school with Grynszpan and knew him casually; Dad escaped to America by the time of the assassination.

Now try to imagine how the Western media would report World War II if they were using the exact same rules of journalism that they apply to the Arab-Israeli conflict.   The assassination of vom Rath by a Jewish youth would be universally held up to illustrate that the German-Jewish conflict was a circle of violence, an ongoing bloody conflict whose roots are so old that no one remembers them, a conflict where each side claims it is retaliating for the violence that the other side perpetrated, a conflict whose causes are all blurred by eons of history.  Sure the Germans were murdering Jews, but then there was the vom Rath assassination, proving the violence was two-directional, symmetric.  Close investigation could probably find a few other examples of Jews using violence against Germans.  Innocent lives are being lost on both sides.  Such senseless tragedy.  Why can’t both sides just live and let live?

Of course, such a representation of World War II would not only be an absurdity but also an obscenity.   World War II was not about a “cycle of violence” between Germans and Jews.  It was unambiguously a campaign of annihilation and oppression of Jews committed by Germans.  The fact that one can identify a handful of outlier events such as the assassination of vom Rath does not convey any symmetry to the “conflict.”   Indeed to misrepresent the Nazi campaign of extermination against Jews as some sort of “symmetric” pair of movements of violence would be proof that the person so misrepresenting the situation was a Nazi-sympathizer and an anti-Semite.

The Middle East conflict is not a cycle of violence.  It is not a “symmetric” campaign of retaliation by Jews against Arabs and Arabs against Jews.  The Middle East conflict is as unambiguously a unidirectional campaign of violence and atrocities as was World War II.  It is about Arabs murdering Jews and not the inverse.  It is about Arabs seeking to deny Jews their human rights and their right to self-determination, and not the inverse.  The Middle East conflict consists of a century of atrocities perpetrated by Arabs against Jews.

But the Western media are willing to go to extreme lengths to force the conflict into the prism of symmetry and the “cycle of violence” fantasy.  Several months ago a Palestinian Arab teenager from East Jerusalem, Mohammed Abu Khdair, age 17,  was kidnapped and murdered by a Jew.  The Jew was mentally ill and believed himself to be the messiah.   He was arrested and jailed by Israel.  The killer did not represent anyone, was not sponsored by anyone, and no one in Israel cheered his crime.  The killing of Abu Khdair came shortly after three Jewish teenagers were murdered by the Hamas in a well-planned operation.  That was an operation sponsored, financed and planned by the Hamas and cheered by most “Palestinians” and by many Israeli Arabs.   Many passed around candies in celebration.

Since the death of Abu Khdair, the media have exploited the case to sell their “symmetry cycle of violence” snake oil.  True, the “Palestinians” murder Jewish children all the time but here we have a single incident of an inverted crime, an Arab teenager murdered by a Jew.  The media obsession is far more than a postman-biting-dog stroke of interest in uncharacteristic news stories.  The media have used the death to manufacture the symmetry fiction and spread it.   After all, if it is symmetric, then both sides are wrong, which means both sides are right, which means there is no right and wrong about which to worry our pretty little heads.

The killing of Abu Khdair was as characteristic of the Middle East conflict as the killing of vom Rath was representative of the events comprising World War II.  And it is hardly the only “vom Rath anomaly” that drives the reporting of the anti-Israel media.   This week Ziad Abu Ein, a terrorist murderer serving as a Palestinian Authority “cabinet minister,” died from a heart attack after being confronted by Israeli troops.   You see, the media are bleating in unison?  It is not just Palestinians who murder Israelis!

Arabs in the West Bank vandalize Jewish property so often that it is generally never even reported as news, even in the Israeli media, because it is so commonplace.  Arson attacks and vandalism of synagogues by Arabs are so frequent that they rarely make it out of the back pages.  But if a handful of teenage Jewish delinquents vandalize some Arab vehicles or paint graffiti on Arab buildings, not only is this highlighted on the front pages, but it is denounced as evidence of Jewish terrorism.  The media, including the Israeli leftist media, scream that such incidents are hate crimes.  Demands are made to define the graffiti painters as a terrorist organization.

Rock throwing by Arabs at Jews in Israel is even less likely to make it into the press or news or even the social media.   But if Arabs allege that some Jewish “settlers” threw some rocks at Arab cars or houses, then stop the presses!   All other news must be removed to page 3.  Arabs in the West bank vandalize Jewish property, including agricultural produce, more frequently than the sun shines in the Middle East.  No one hears about it because it is not considered “news.”  After all, dogs chasing postmen are just not very interesting or newsworthy.  But let some Arabs or leftists allege that Jewish “settlers” have vandalized some West Bank Arab olive trees and the media shrieks are deafening.  So deafening, in fact, that they drown out reporting about some cases of  Arabs and leftists intentionally vandalizing Arab olive trees as provocations to be blamed on “settlers.”   And it goes without saying that the firing of thousands of rockets by Gaza terrorists at Israeli civilians is never important enough to be reported as news.  But let Israel fire back at the savages and there – you see – we are back in the symmetric cycle of violence.

The symmetry perversion has been played up by the media for so long that few can even keep straight the fundamental underlying truths behind the conflict.  There is a war in the Middle East because the Arabs, controlling territory nearly twice that of the United States (including Alaska), are unwilling for the Jews to control their own state smaller than New Jersey.  The Middle East conflict is not about unwillingness on the part of Jews to accept self-determination for Arabs, but rather by unwillingness on the part of Arabs to accept self-determination for Jews.  Middle East violence is about the campaign of terrorist aggression by the Arab world, including its “Palestinian” playthings, to murder as many Jewish children and other civilians as possible.  The number of innocent Palestinian civilians intentionally murdered by Israel is precisely zero.  Palestinians get killed when Israel shoots back and retaliates for Arab terror and aggression and rocket attacks.  When Arabs do not attack Jews, the Jews do not shoot back.  There is no anti-Arab Jewish terrorism.

Arab terrorism is not caused by Israeli “occupation” but rather by the removal of Israeli occupation.  The “Palestinians” have about as legitimate a claim to statehood and independence as did the Sudeten Germans in Czechoslovakia.   Granting “Palestinians” independence will have precisely the same effect as did the granting “self-determination” to the Sudeten Germans.  The only reason Arabs demand that the “Palestinians” be granted a state is in order to use it to launch an all-out war of annihilation and terror against what would be the rump Israel.

Israel is the only country in the Middle East that is NOT an apartheid regime.  The only Arabs in the Middle East enjoying human rights are those living under Israeli  rule.   The treatment of Arabs by Israel is at least a thousand times better than the treatment of Arabs by Arab regimes.   The “stateless Palestinians” are Arabs, and Arabs control 22 states.   No one is stopping any Arabs uncomfortable about living in a Jewish state from moving to any of those 22 states and taking all their assets and wealth with them.  The Middle East conflict is about injustices perpetrated by Arabs against Jews and not the other way around.

None of this belies the possibility that if one seeks hard enough one can find incidents in which some Jews behave badly towards some Arabs.  Just as Hershel Grynszpan may have murdered the wrong German.  But that hardly makes the Middle East conflict a symmetric cycle of violence and injustice.  There was a handful of white slaves owned by slaveholders in the American south before the Civil War and there were small numbers of black slave-owners.   Using that to paint pre-Emancipation slavery as a symmetry of black and white slaves with black and white slave-owners would of course by an obscenity.   Use of the assassination of vom Rath to create fictional symmetry would be even worse.  But nothing can compete with the malicious, repugnant, and perfidious distortion of the Middle East conflict by the media as a symmetric conflict and a cycle of violence.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Larry Larkin

    Australia is a country that is larger than the contiguous United States.

    It’s largest cattle station (ranch in American terms) is larger than Israel, and several more are close in size.

    There’s the difference. There is a single piece of privately own land here in Australia that is larger than the entire country of Israel.

    • JayWye

      the Arabs/muslims got the vast majority of the Mandate of Palestine,but they’re greedy and want the entire Mandate(with NO Jews.).
      Despite the fact that Jews have lived there continuously since ancient Israel was formed,and that the Arabs are latecomers,invaders.

  • Bamaguje

    Brilliantly written Dr Plaut. You couldn’t be clearer for those who are receptive to the truth.
    Unfortunately, the pro-Palestinian lamestream media, academia and politicians are all impervious to common sense and the truth.
    Their politically correct fictions about the Arab-Israeli conflict must be sustained regardless of facts that debunk them.

  • kiwi41

    If ANY muz slime infested country finally gets a government that is for the full restoration of western/ Christian society, the first action they must initiate is a repeat of Kristallnacht against all mosques, moreslime political and social organizations, media outlets, in fact, ANYTHING muz slime based is instantly eliminated, with forced repatriation of all non citizens to follow, and controls of the vermin with citizenship, to such a degree, that they are ” encouraged ” to emigrate.

  • Tradecraft46

    Starting when I was at Hopkins in the 1960sm I heard it a lot: mostly from Jews.

  • billobillo54

    Dr. Pluat’s article is 100% accurate in its analysis. As a Protestant, Evangelical, Zionist I perceive the irrational and unjust oppression against Israel as a clear validation of the accuracy of the Bible’s prophecy regarding Israel and JERUSALEM AND JUDEA (I.E. THE WEST BANK) being the geopolitical center of the world’s conflict at the end of the age.

  • Hard Little Machine

    It’s not obvious that the New York Times DIDN’T cover the events of 1938 that way. I am dead serious. Read Laurel Luff, Deborah Lipstadt, Robert Abzug or David Wyman.

  • vonrock

    It’s a Black and Muslim world, just ask Barack.

  • Ken Kelso

    Palestinian terrorists behind massacre at synagogue two week ago beheaded 2 of the Rabbis, chopped of their arms and gouged out the eyes of the the Rabbi’s.
    Fast forward to 11 47 of the video

    http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2014/12/what-media-is-not-telling-you-about-har.html#links
    What the media is not telling you about the Har Nof massacre
    Dec 12, 2014

  • DontMessWithAmerica

    Where this inexplicable attitude by media has come from will probably remain a mystery through the ages. When the venerable New York Times prints outright lies to back their anti-Israel and pro-Obama stance then all one can do is shake one’s head. And the paper is Jewish owned at that. They support my contention that Jews and Arabs have common roots as evidenced by Arabs breeding suicide bombers and American Jews breeding suicide voters. By the way, in German, the prefix to surnames meaning “from” is “von” not “vom.”

    • hiernonymous

      “By the way, in German, the prefix to surnames meaning “from” is “von” not “vom.””

      While FPM struggles with foreign languages at times, this time they got it right. It’s “vom Rath,” not “von Rath.”

      “Vom” is a common German contraction of “von dem.” Zu and bei also follow this pattern.

  • Bandido

    This perverted media (i.e., Leftist) war against Israel will continue unabated until Israel delivers such a massive military shock to the terrorists and their State sponsors—creates a true ‘Nakba’ that dwarfs the 1967 Lightning War—that its enemies cannot contemplate even in dreams an assault on a single Israeli citizen or a yard of Israeli property anywhere. Unless and until this occurs, the media/terrorist war of attrition against Israel will only continue and intensify. And if Israel does not undertake such an operation at some point in the near future, then it is suffering from political Stockholm Syndrome and will be complicit in its own demise.