Bill Whittle: Obama’s Black Skin Privilege

Everyone knows it is true, and no one has the courage to say it. The American people are letting Barack Obama destroy this country through illegal executive orders for one reason and one reason only. In his latest FIREWALL, Bill Whittle has the courage to speak out and make the case that no one else will make. See the video and transcript below. 

TRANSCRIPT:

Well, Barack Obama has proclaimed amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. Conservative pundits have called this act illegal, saying the President does not have the power to unilaterally circumvent Congress on any issue, let alone one of this magnitude. Senators and Representatives have called his act illegal. Saturday Night Live called it illegal, Jon Stewart on The Daily Show called it Illegal, and President Obama himself, on two dozen occasions, said he did not have the Constitutional authority to do this and was therefore illegal.

He didn’t care. He did it anyway.

Many of us knew before his election what he really thought of the American people, but for those who didn’t we have Jonathan Gruber, one of the Chief Architects of Obamacare, saying repeatedly on camera that they had intentionally mislabeled what was obviously a bill-killing tax on the American people. He then told his elitist, left-wing audience that the entire sham depended on the stupidity of the American voter. Furthermore, Gruber has stated, on camera, that the President was not only well aware, from the beginning, that they were  lying to the American people – Obama actually led the discussion of how this could be done.

We will set aside, for a moment, the fact that Obamacare passed without a single Republican vote – so when Gruber and Obama say they are depending on the stupidity of the American voter, they are really saying they are depending on the stupidity of the half of the country that votes Democrat. The bottom line is that there can no longer be any question of the contempt in which this President holds the American people. Do we suddenly think that now, after dictating amnesty into law, this man is suddenly going to constrain himself out of respect for the American people and the Constitution?

Please. A few days before his election he said we were on the verge of fundamentally transforming the United States of America. He has fundamentally transformed it. When a man can dictate law…that’s a dictatorship. It’s pretty simple really. Any questions?

Both Gruber and Obama are wrong about the American people. We’re not stupid.

We’re scared. In fact, we’re not just scared – we’re scared senseless. We see the American nightmare of not just single-party rule but actual illegal dictatorship unfolding before our eyes, and we are as paralyzed as cavemen frozen in fear, eyes closed, as the leopard growls quietly, inside the fire and the sentry.

Many Americans think Obama is the problem. Obama is not the problem. Our Constitution was written for one purpose and one purpose only: to prevent the rise of a dictatorship. So what failed? How did we build this tyranny?

When the Progressive Left began their takeover of academia in the 1960’s, they began inculcating their radical worldview all across the spectrum – and we let them get away with it. Three generations later, journalism students are no longer encouraged to seek out the truth, whatever the cost – they are taught which stories to promote, and which to suppress, in order to advance the Larger Truth of left-wing utopian philosophy.

When a President that they despise – such as Richard Nixon – acted illegally they hounded him out of office. With a President they adore – like Barack Obama – they see to it that stories such as Gruber and his multiple on-camera admissions of deception never see the light of day.

Why? We know why. Everybody knows why.

We are allowing Barack Obama to get away with this because he is black. That’s it, and that’s all. To say if he were white he would have been impeached already is a non-sequitor; if he were white a man of his inexperience and radical background would never have been elected in the first place. America voted for him to prove they were not racist, and now we will let him destroy this government for the same reason.

It’s guilt that paralyzes us – this Progressive Obama dictatorship is built on guilt over the original sin of slavery.

It’s guilt – and also fear. That’s why Obama and Eric Holder have been encouraging the Ferguson protestors to stay the course. “We don’t give a fuck about your laws,” said one of them, and the President and the disgraceful Attorney General obviously don’t either. They need Ferguson to remind the American people of what will happen should they decide to hold the first black President accountable to the same rules as the previous forty-four.

Everyone knows it is true, and no one has the courage to say it.

As for me… I know what people have said, and will say about me, and I’d love to tell you that I don’t care but I do care. Charges of racism only work against people who are not racist. Real racists revel in the name.

((MARTIN LUTHER KING)))

So I am going to stand with this man. I believe that Barack Obama and his multiple, flagrant and impeachable illegal actions should be judged not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • truebearing

    Brilliant commentary. Extremely honest, courageous, and truthful. Obama’s coup is being allowed to succeed because too many white people are afraid of violence prone black people. Guilt…yes, that is still a factor for some, but fear is the real problem. Ferguson is basically a way of “brownshirting” white America.

    Well fear this: letting a dictator — a vindictive racist — consolidate power is far more frightening than standing up to him while he is politically weak. Waiting until he has the power to confiscate your money and property by sending mobs of black gang members, or ATF agents, to your house or business is a lot more terrifying than running his corrupt, malignant a*s out of office before things degenerate to that point.

    Keep in mind that Obama was aided in his rise to power by none other than George Soros, a sociopathic ethnic Jew who collaborated with the N azis in WWII. Obama is being advised to see how far he can go, and so far he has been able to act as a dictator with complete impunity… unless of course you consider John Boehner’s wimpering some kind of resistance.

    The Republicans need to toss Boehner out of the speakership, and unceremoniously dump McConnell as Majority Leader. As soon as that is accomplished they need to announce exploratory hearings on the legal grounds for impeaching Obama, and Holder too. Preliminary hearings are the perfect vehicle for building public support, since even the networks can’t avoid covering the hearings.

    Obama’s crimes speak for themselves, but when the consequences of his crimes are explained to average Americans, his popularity will hit new lows. The hearings insulate the Republicans from what they fear would look too rash. They simply need to apply the usual Washington bromides: “This is just exploratory,” “we don’t want to act rashly,” etc. But the stage will be set and the damage to Obama begun.

    Yes, blacks will riot, but what else is new? Obama and Holder are mobilizing blacks to riot at the drop of a hat already. Could they be preparing for the nation’s reaction to Obama’s refusal to step down in 2016? That would get my vote.

    Are we going to let Obama steal America without so much as an impeachment? Yes, people will have to stand up and show some courage in defending themselves, preferably in a united fashion, but Obama has to be impeached, and doing it in an incremental fashion is a good way to ease cowardly Republicans into some kind of action that will create momentum that will hopefully carry through to impeachment, and removal from office.

    No doubt there will be people who don’t agree with me, and that is fine, as long as you provide your solution along with any criticism. We already have too many analysts that think criticism of fellow conservatives will somehow solve the malignant problem we have in the Whitehouse.

    Obama is the enemy, not black people. Let’s not assume all blacks will riot for the sake of Obama. He’s hurting them with Amnesty too and this is a perfect time to warn them.

    Edit

    Share ›

    • John E Coleman

      Well written !! We must impeach this 50/50 human
      God help us if we don’t !! Look what he has done so far !!
      He still has time to wreck our USA even to his last breath

    • marlene

      With Boehner, throw out Sessions too and close the doors to all political positions behind them.

      • Terry Saulsbury

        Marlene are you merely stupid or just ignorant?….Jeff Sessions is one of the few Senators trying to stop this BS.

    • MC Slammer

      Would you please stop this impeachment nonsense please. Tell me, you need 67 votes in the Senate to remove the Bumbler from office, give me a list of democrats who would vote with Republicans.

      The silly impeachment talk does nothing but stir up THEIR base and increase their fundraising.

      Get a grip already.

  • http://www.apollospeaks.com/ ApolloSpeaks

    I LOVE MY LOCAL COPS!

    LOVE MY LOCAL COURTS!

    LOVE THE US CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM
    FROM BORDER TO BORDER AND COAST TO COAST!

    IT’S THE BEST, FAIREST, JUSTEST IN THE WORLD!

    DON’T LIKE IT?

    HATE IT RIGHT OR WRONG?

    THINK IT’S RACIST, DISCRIMINATORY, ANTI-BLACK , UNFAIR?

    AND THERE’S RAMPANT POLICE BRUTALITY EVERYWHERE?

    THINK IT ILL-SERVED TRAYVON MARTIN?

    MURDERED MICHAEL BROWN?

    AND STRANGLED ERIC GARNER TO DEATH
    AS HE WAS GASPING FOR AIR?

    WELL THEN, HERE’S THE SOLUTION:

    FIND A COUNTRY WITH A BETTER SYSTEM AND LIVE THERE.

    http://www.apollospeaks.com

    • cheeseburger

      Good Point!

  • William James Ward

    Strange we should be judging a person not on skin color but by
    the content of their character, if so Obama is the anti-Christ and
    lights up the true nature of leftists, criminal swine. He needs to
    be locked away in a hole in the most isolated prison on Earth
    along with the leftist army presently destroying our lives. The law
    must be obeyed, our Constitutional system upheld or we descend
    to the status of rabble and lose to the Communist moles in the
    Democrat and Republican parties………………………..William

    • marlene

      Just as John the Baptist paved the way for Jesus, so does obama pave the way for the anti-christ. Satan is the tempter.

  • MrUniteUs1

    No such thing as Black skin privilege.

    Unarmed Black man shot 14 times by police.

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/autopsy-milwaukee-cop-shot-mentally-ill-black-man-from-above-and-behind-14-times/

    • glpage

      Affirmative action is one form of black skin privilege. If I were in college would I be allowed to join the black student union? Nope, there’s another form of black skin privilege. Media coverage of Michael Brown’s death versus next to no coverage of Zemir Begic (the white guy beaten to death by some thugs, why mention race, with hammers), who, by the way, had not been involved in any illegal activity prior to his murder; another form of black skin privilege. The media refusing to do their job and expose the violations of law by Obama and Holder, which exceeds, by far, anything Nixon did. Do you want me to go on? I really try to believe in fairness, but the left has tilted the narrative to favor blacks. That is black skin privilege.

      • MrUniteUs1

        White skin privilege, allowed whites to get into college based on legacy, money, and who the family knew.
        Whites came up with the idea of Affirmative Action. White skin privilege, allowed white politicians to legalize Affirmative,
        Action instead of focusing on raising standards k-12. White skin privilege allowed AA to include white women, white veterans, white disabled,white athletes, and whites with Spanish sounding last names. Nixon expanded AA to include Asians, (something to do with China).
        Yes Whites legalized AA, included whites in AA, pretended it was only for The Blacks, and then blamed The Blacks. How could whites do this?
        White skin privilege.

        • truebearing

          Raising standards k-12? Blacks were failing with the existing standards, so you want them raised? Affirmative Action was the liberal’s idea of giving blacks an unfair advantage precisely because they weren’t competing academically, and you have construed that into “white privilege? You are one rationally challenged racist. That made ZERO sense.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Providing Up to date school books and comparable facilities would have been a much better way to go.
            So why are most of the people eligible for Affirmative Action white. White women, white veterans, white handicap, white athletes, benefit from AA.

        • Exsaint

          White skin privilege? LOL!

          I got into college due to hard work and determination. I am the first man in my family to graduate from a university. My family could not pay for my education so I had to take out student loans.

          Legacy? Money? Who my family knows? Nonsense! I had none of those advantages. I worked for my education. I have earned what I have. You should try the same.

        • Martin

          Actually Democrats are to blame for nearly EVERY policy that has been destructive to Blacks in the United States…for over 200 years and still going strong.

      • MrUniteUs1

        I really try to believe in fairness, but the left has tilted the narrative to favor blacks” Give some examples.

        • glpage

          I already did. They are letting the kids that killed the Bosnian slide; yeah, one was Hispanic, but, we’re not hearing anything from the media, especially the fact that this attack on Bosnians in St Louis by blacks is fairly common. The knock out game (polar bear hunting, etc.) which apparently started in the St Louis area has gotten a pass from the MSM even though several people have been killed and even journalists have been victims. Another good example several years ago, just so we realize that this is not a new phenomena, was the DC sniper problem; Chuck Moose being the racist he is actually told his detectives not to follow the leads the indicated blacks were the snipers and the media let him slide, which caused the avoidable death of several people. The best example is the crap the media is letting Obama and Holder get away with; if a white Republican were President the media would be on it like stink on you know what.

          This really can go on for quite a while. In my lame-assed opinion, the vast majority of blacks are very decent people; at least that has been my experience, so, maybe I’m lucky. But, there is enough bad actions from a minority of blacks that the media refuses to critically examine (why don’t they talk more about black on black crime, especially in places like Chicago) that they are doing everyone, including blacks, a disservice by glossing over reality.

      • cheeseburger

        I agree

  • cheeseburger

    I never had a beef with Black people in my life… until now… until Ferguson, and the Michael Brown fiasco. I now see all Blacks in a different light. They are flat-out stone cold racists who hate all whites with a murderous intensity. They are all more than willing to lie about anything and everything that supports their murderous hatred. Blacks will lie for Blacks willfully. their word is not their bond. They are looters and thieves, who would trample a white baby to death in their rush to steal television sets and anything else of value that they can grab. Am I serious??? No, but there is a rising tide of White people who now see Blacks as Hate-filled evil demons. How did this come about? Black people created it. From now on I will silently boycott Black enterprises, and view Black people in general as dishonest and violent. If Black people had not supported what they knew to be a Lie, following the Grand Jury testimony, and the stone cold FACTS that were presented, many, many Whites would still consider as people… just average folks, without any racial tags. If I see a Black guy laying on the street bleeding, will I help him or not? Good question.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Do you also hate all the Whites that thought Wilson should go to trial? Do you feel they all hate White people. Are they hate filled evil demons?

      • truebearing

        Hating people for being stupid is one thing. Hating them because they hate you is another. You think it is fine for blacks to hate whites, threaten whites, kill whites, rape whites, steal from whites, or live off the labor of whites, but are outraged that SOME whites had black slaves, even though most whites didn’t have slaves and some blacks sold other blacks into slavery, and some blacks also had black slaves. These facts destroy your idiotic arguments, but you are too racist to admit the truth.

        Is having to pay exhorbitant amounts of taxes so blacks can sponge off the government your idea of white privilege? Are the white girls forced into prostitution by black pimps and gangs white privilege? Is paying for blacks to get free health care another white privilege? You can shove your “white privilege” lies up your dumb a*s.

        • MrUniteUs1

          First it’s stupid to hate someone because of skin tone. You can’t tell one thing about a person based on their skin color, good, bad, smart, dumb. You can’t tell. I have written in the past how only 4% of Southern Whites were slave owners. Most southern whites were illiterate and lived in abject poverty. Hundreds of thousands died fighting for a system that kept them impoverished. Meanwhile wealthy plantation owners sipped on mint julep and watched. Blacks. whites, Jews, and Muslims were involved in the enslavement of Africans and Europeans over the centuries. 400,000 Jews served in Hitler’s Army.
          More of are taxes dollars goes to corporate contractors and corporate farmers, coporate welfare, than poor blacks and whites. Romney sponged a billion tax dollars for the 2002 Olympics. White privilege.
          Halliburton recieves billions in U.S taxs but moved it’s headquarters overseas to avoid paying taxes. White privilege. That means the rest us have to make up the difference. Pimps come in all skin tones, and can be found in every country.

          • truebearing

            I agree that it is stupid to hate someone based on skin color, but that is what blacks who are racist toward whites are doing. And it is causing a backlash that is building and could end in an ugly racial war.

            Romney came in and saved the Olympics from being a national disgrace. That has nothing to do with white privilege, which is a racist concept.

            Haliburton is peanuts compared to GE. They made 14 billion in profits in 2010 — during the period when GE CEO Jeff Immelt was Obama’s Chairman of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. GE also managed to weasel over 3 billion in tax benefits the same year. That is called corporate fascism, and Obama was the King Fascist. It is apalling and as far as I’m concerned, both Obama and Immelt should be in jail for that kind of crap.

            You shouldn’t assume that because I, or any other poster here, am a conservative, I don’t care about the poor. I do, but I have yet to see government handouts solve the problem.

          • Karen Strine

            This is coming down from the top-the president is keeping this going. Here’s a man who is biracial and had feet in both communities of people but won’t acknowledge the good done by his grandparents who raised and educated him and the system because of his smarts (not diminishing that) and color, got an IVY League education as did his wife. He could heal this wound now if he really cared.

          • cheeseburger

            A quote from Obama’s book, Audacity of Hope:

            “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.

            He also stands with Al Sharpton, Racist, and Jesse Jackson, Racist. As long as we have the Racist Obama running the country with the help of his Black Panther Racist Fellow Travelers, Obama will continue to damage America as much as is humanly possible. He despises Whites, Love Jihadist Muslims, and hates Freedom in general and freedom of speech in particular and America in general, and will do everything possible to Damage our Great Country. We still have the right to vote. That has not yet been stolen from us by Obama and the Demonic Democratic Party. Vote early, and vote often!

          • ebonystone

            “… only 4% of Southern Whites were slave owners….”

            Considerably more than that:

            Selected Statistics on Slavery in the United States

            (unless otherwise noted, all data is as of the 1860 census)

            Census data can be appealed to in order to determine the extent of slave ownership in each of the states that allowed it in 1860. The figures given here are the percentage of slave-owning families as a fraction of total free households in the state. The data was taken from a census archive site at the University of Virginia.
            In the Lower South (SC, GA, AL, MS, LA, TX, FL — those states that seceded first), about 36.7% of the white families owned slaves. In the Middle South (VA, NC, TN, AR — those states that seceded only after Fort Sumter was fired on) the percentage is around 25.3%, and the total for the two combined regions — which is what most folks think of as the Confederacy — is 30.8%. In the Border States (DE, MD, KY, MO — those slave states that did not secede) the percentage of slave-ownership was 15.9%, and the total throughout the slave states was almost exactly 26%.

      • cheeseburger

        I guess you missed the part in the middle of my comment where I said: “Am I serious??? No”. Unfortunately, I do believe that now, because of the Ferguson rioting and arson, there is going to be a perception on the part of White people that Blacks are rioters, and bad human beings in general. Direct your attention to the facts that came out in the Grand Jury testimony. It’s on-line for the world to see, but the majority of the Black population saw fit to ignore the findings. I can only surmise that Blacks prefer the social medias’ fuzzy mythological fantasy as opposed to hard solid irrefutable facts, well documented, to the garbage that angry spew to justify what ‘somebody’ told them.

        • wandrako

          Jon Stewart is running a picture of a young, handsome Brown just like the media did of Travon Martin. He could be honest. The pictures on all the media were not a young kid so why did he go out of his way to portray him this way?

          • cheeseburger

            Because ‘Leftists’ aka ‘Progressives’ are not interested in the truth. They are only interested in winning for their ‘side’. The actual truth is only useful to a Leftist if the facts fit their ideology. For a Leftist/Progressive ‘winning’ is more important than the truth. Winning is useful to Leftists because whey win Power and Control over the ‘Little People’, whom they consider their subjects, who will do their bidding. Leftists avoid civil debate. They become angry whenever their ideology is perceived to be threatened. Knowing in their hearts that they are better than ‘the rest of us’, they become furious at our stupidity. POWER… the greatest aphrodisiac.

      • Karen Strine

        It’s sad what’s been happening but there is such anger when facts such as forensics are presented and then people don’t believe it? Read my comment above, please, if you are truly a uniter as your “name” implies. You need to know the why of the hate and anger. I am angry, too, but try to be a uniter as well. It keeps getting harder to want to unite.

      • wandrako

        Many are and were in the riots and looting in Ferguson along with the blacks.

    • http://whenfallsthecoliseum.com/author/kwatson/ megapotamus

      There were seven witnesses that backed Wilson’s story. All were black. All, now, are subject to street justice…. Snitches get Stitches, and all of that. There is indeed a mania, a madness of crowds among the black community but it is media driven. I won’t say it is paper-thin but it is far from down to the core. Certainly it is far from 100%. Your mileage may vary but the ‘boycott’ of black enterprises will happen regardless of anyone’s ideology. Whites just won’t go into these areas. They don’t now. Forward.

      • cheeseburger

        ‘Snitches get Stiches’ says a lot about the Black ethos. Also, read the book (or just google the title) ‘White Girl Bleed a Lot’ We have more than three generations of Welfare Mothers popping out black babies as fast as the mothers can produce them, to buck up their welfare checks, and not a Father to be seen. If a White person comments on this reality, there are mobs both Black and White that will scream ‘racist’. White folks are supposed to just suck it up and not notice while the Democratic politicians throw ‘free stuff’ at the Black rabble to keep them voting democratic. So Whites are supposed to just shut up and not notice the ‘bread and circus’ games. Where are the Married, Stable families that must exist in order to raise normal, healthy families? Few and far between in the Black community.

        • kasandra

          Oh, there are plenty in TV commercials.

        • wandrako

          There are a lot of whites that cannot support a white if there is a choice in who to believe in something like Ferguson. I am so glad that there were seven honest blacks that told the truth to the grand jury. I am proud of the police chief in WI that is standing for truth and all citizens not just black. Take the mayor of NY and stick him in Chicago where he can see what happens when blacks see a black. I am proud of the wife and daughter of Garner that state that it was not racism that killed him their husband and father.

    • OdinsAcolyte

      Not all are like that. Not even close. You are flat out foolish.

    • Karen Strine

      You’d help him as you’d see him as a human being but I understand the anger and I think the community of being black is more important than the truth of forensics and that gap is bigger than any to bridge. The president is keeping this racism going, as one writer, posed to prevent anyone from attacking his policies of knocking the US back a notch. It’s our warning.

      • cheeseburger

        Truthfully, I don’t have a beef with Blacks in general, I have a beef with looters and people who refuse to accept the Rule of Law. Without Rule of Law we have Rule of Mob. I have a beef with our President, who likes only Blacks and Muslims who are also Democrats. Others need not apply.

    • wandrako

      Not all blacks. Most of them if you believe what you see on the media but even there not all are racists. Obama and Holder certainly are.

  • Gee

    I have but a single disagreement with Mr. Whittle’s comments. The leftists did not begin their take over in the 1960s. It started with the Imperial Presidency of Woodrow Wilson in 1913.

    • marlene

      It may have started back then but it was slow and suppressed. The point here is that it now runs like the Secretariat all over us.

      • http://whenfallsthecoliseum.com/author/kwatson/ megapotamus

        Mmm. It was pushed back but not so slow when Wilson was in office. Truly Wilson is the father of much of our modern predicament.

    • JayWye

      socialists targeted education in the early 1900′s;
      they’ve been working at it a long time,have been wildly successful at gaining control of it,and now we’re seeing the effects of that,all across our society.
      Legislators,JUDGES,doctors,scientists,MEDIA,teachers,etc,all a product of a socialist education system. All indoctrinated in socialism,and applying it in their everyday lives.
      Never forget that the socialists have a dominance at nearly every university,and at most every public grade school.
      socialist indoctrination begins at an early age and continues throughout high school and college.
      THAT is what is really hurting America,and I’m not so sure we can overcome it,it may already be too late. it took a long time for the commies to become entrenched in education,and it will take a long time to weed them out,if it can be done at all.

  • GuyGreen

    Brilliant and courageous as always, Mr. Whittle. One of my favorite definitions in Ambrose Bierce’s Devil’s Dictionary is that of an optimist: “optimist, n. – a proponent of the theory that black is white.” I also am a big believer in the logical theorem of Ockham’s Razor, the best distillation of which I find to be that of Isaac Newton: “We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.” Therefore, I must conclude that our nation is headed over the cliff. Absent a miraculous infusion of spine, sinew and soul in half of our population, and the thorough shunning of the other half, the best I can offer to all is a cheerful “Happy Landings.”

  • bigjulie

    Bill Whittle is to blog spots what Daniel Greenfield is to the written word! This is a brilliantly done commentary!
    For a first-hand account of how Leftie media is being manipulated by Obama, please read STONEWALLED, by Sharyl Attkisson! It’s as incisive and spot-on as David Horowitz’s TAKE NO PRISONERS is about defeating the Left, once and for all!
    The American People are really being screwed by Mainstream Media, now almost completely possessed by the Left, as they work tirelessly to continue to promote our nascent Dictator-In-Chief, who, upon close examination is the quintessence of “bumbling fool”! Indeed, when you can’t even do something politically for your own base, continued support of Obama by Blacks is not a very complimentary example of intellect at work…on either side!

  • marlene

    Obama is a traitor and an enemy of the people. Our constitution makes it clear that he needs to be renoved and all members of congress, governors and state legislators who fail to remove him are also considered to be traitors and enemies of the people. This is one of the reason for our well-armed constitutional militia.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Do you feel the same way about the illegal employers, that higher illegal immigrants?

      • glpage

        They should be arrested if that is what the law stipulates.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Agreed. But where is the outcry against the main cause of illegal immigration, illegal employers.

          • glpage

            Both political parties are complicit in this mess. Their monied supporters don’t want the problem fixed. And that is why we’re not hearing any outcry; the money doesn’t want the problem solved and they influence the press as much if not more than they influence politicians. Rich socialists like the illegal aliens because they will profit more from the status quo than they will from solving the problem. Frankly, considering what amnesty has the potential of doing to the employment possibilities of poor blacks (and whites for that matter), I’m surprised, to some extent, that Obama is pushing it. Then again he doesn’t have to worry about reelection and his rich supporters want it.

          • truebearing

            The Obamas don’t care about the poor blacks. His wonderful wife, Michele, was caught patient dumping during her grossly over paid stint at the University of Chicago Hospital. It seems upon successfully refusing to treat poor blacks, and shuffling them to other facilities, she recieved a hefty hike in her salary. Just one example of the Obama’s contempt for poor blacks. A better one is Amnesty.

          • Rick Allen Carfagna

            There are no DINO’S the same as there are no RINO’S.

            There are ONLY
            totally owned employees of the Bilderberg Group.

            Each has their
            assigned duties where the herding of the sheeple is concerned.

            Some will profess to
            be representative of the “original” party and make very public speeches
            professing to stand FOR the constitution this nation was founded upon. They
            will claim to stand AGAINST the party as it now exists. But they are STILL IN
            the party they are “professing” to be “against”. Until voting is required on
            something the public as a whole is against. Then they will be assigned their
            votes by their masters. Some will say their anti-America vote was truly in “the
            best interests of the American people” and the sheeple as always will fall for
            it hook, line and sinker. Others who have the biggest group of sheeple
            following and adoring them will be assigned to actually vote against the
            anti-America legislation because it is their job to keep the sheeple in the
            herd and following their direction.

            Some will be
            completely out in the open publicly adhering to the orders of their masters and
            creating the illusion that they are “against” the group of herders that claim
            to stand FOR the sheeple. But they are ALL members of BOTH herding teams.

            Whether with a ‘D’ or
            an ‘R’ the — In Name Only – classification doesn’t mean anything at all.
            BECAUSE when one actually removes their media and parentally placed blinders
            and actually looks in earnest at America over the past century, they will
            easily see that ALL of the damage done to this nation (without even ONE
            exception) came at the hands of BOTH the democrat side as well as the
            republican side of what in reality is now America’s actual ONE major political party.
            ALL damage. ALL loss of freedoms. NO exceptions. BOTH sides of the party are
            still and only doing what they have ALWAYS done. The owners of the party have
            however found different slogans to put out for the people to swallow and adhere
            to which keep them in their respective herds. Slogans like “the RINO’S and
            DINO’S” have “taken over”, as well as “we need to “take our party back”. And
            those slogans continue to be totally effective.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Exactly.

      • truebearing

        They are violating the law, they should be penalized. Why would think anyine feels otherwise? Could it be that you are projecting your own unbalanced view of justice?

        • MrUniteUs1

          Then why do illegal employers get a pass? This started long before President Obama took office. When is the last time your heard about an illegal employer getting punished for hiring illegal immigrants.

          • truebearing

            I’m agreeing with you. I have always opposed rewarding illegal aliens, including when Reagan gave them amnesty. Employers are paying sub-standard wages to compete with foreign manufacturing. I understand their dilemma, but the solution isn’t ignoring our laws, it is changing the corporate taxation rate, and forcing foreign corporations to pay what they owe. And stop letting China manipulate its currency to our detriment.

            The difference between what Reagan did and what Obama is doing is huge, however. The Congress passed legislation and Reagan signed it. Obama is going completely rogue and violating his oath, the laws of the land, and even reneging on his own assessment of the legality of executive action.

            I should also point out that Reagan didn’t open the borders to any disease ridden bum, or Muslim terrorist who wanted to enter the US.

          • MrUniteUs1

            The solution is to punish illegal employers.
            Abraham Lincoln, Jackie Robinson, Martin Luther King Jr., and President were all accused of hurting race relations.

          • kasandra

            The solution is a secure border fence. No illegal immigrants/no employers hiring illegal immigrants. Win/Win. Obama and his Party have heroically resisted all Republican attempts to effectively secure the border as the first item in the solution to our immigration problems.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Supply and demand. Punish illegal employers and the demand for illegal immigrant labor will drop.

            President Obama expanded the border fence, and has already deported more illegals than George Bush.

          • kasandra

            I guess you missed it when, in previous comments, I told you that the Obama administration changed the definition of deportation to include people turned away at the border who never got into the U.S. and, thus, were never deported as normal people understand the word. Meanwhile, he’s importing tens of thousands of aliens, refusing to do anything legal about those that are already here, and preventing the Border Service from doing their job. Yeah, he’s real tough on illegal immigration.

      • kasandra

        Er, that should be “hire.”

        • MrUniteUs1

          Toda

  • MrUniteUs1

    White skin privilege allows illegal employers, mostly white, to hire illegal immigrants. Bill Whittle may be one of them. If you hire, or patronize businesses that hire illegal immigrants, then you are the main blame for illegal immigration.
    Ronald Reagan granted unconditional amnesty to millions of illegals. Bush replaced American workers with Mexican workers post Katrina. Bush and Reagan signed far more Executive orders than President Obama. Yet nary a peep.
    Why not? White skin privilege.

    • glpage

      Few, if any, of Reagan’s and Bush’s executive order flew in the face of the law.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Again you use white privilege to ignore illegal employers, the number one cause of illegal immigration. Do you think it was legal for Reagan to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants. Do you think it was legal for Bush to replace American workers with Mexican workers post Hurricane Katrina.

        • truebearing

          You’re a simpleton. You can’ debate so you fall back on your racist talking points.

          No one here supports employers hiring illegals. Liberals are the ones who allowed that with a wink and a nod. Conservatives want Americans to get those jobs, but certain groups of Americans don’t want jobs. They want freebies, so we have to allow some workers into the country to fill the employment gaps. It used to be orderly, controlled, and the migrant workers went back to Mexico after the harvest season was over, but then the Left saw a political opportunity, so now they are encouraging massive numbers of illegals to come here, and plan to give them better benefits than Americans get. And the architect of this is Barack Hussein Obama. I guess he doesn’t give a rat’s patoot about black lives because blacks are the ones who will be competing for the same jobs and benefits with this huge increase in poor hispanics.

          So much for black loyalty to blacks…kind of like in Chicago, eh?

          • MrUniteUs1

            White conservatives want cheap illegal immigrant labor. That’s why Reagan granted them amnesty. White conservatives also want cheap foreign labor, that’s why the changed the tax laws to promote outsourcing.. They hate white union workers, and white government employees.
            And you what the call poor whites. Poor whites on welfare and food stamps are not even to be discussed.

        • http://whenfallsthecoliseum.com/author/kwatson/ megapotamus

          Reagan’s amnesty was legislative.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Yep white Republican legislators voted for Reagan’s amnesty plan.

    • Exsaint

      White skin privilege is a myth, junior. Your professors, your main stream media, and your president have fooled you.

      • Bill_H2

        White Skin Privilege is the latest toxic brew brought to you by the Leftist PC Meme factory to again frame the national dialogue from a Leftist perspective. Jealousy and envy are dangerous motivators, lets hope it blows up in their faces.

        • MrUniteUs1

          White skin privilege is the toxic brew that is old as the country.

          • canalway

            You sound like an angry racist liberal with serious issues.

          • Exsaint

            He is.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Just responding to racist article with some facts.

          • Exsaint

            Left wing lies are the real toxic brew, son. Wake up!

          • MrUniteUs1

            Yep so are right wing lies.
            Where do you stand on the issue of abortion?

          • Bill_H2

            As a member of the melanin deprived, I do not consider it a “privilege” to be funding the socialist utopian projective BS going on in our major institutions and in our national government with MY Tax money. You and your ilk have no idea of what it means to get up everyday and go to work on a W2, only to see nearly half your salary being forcefully taken (robbed) every year and used to heap abuse & the latest Marxist psychobabble along with the false social constructs that go with them to justify your grand theft. You do not know what your are talking about, and if you did, you would had to been alive to have witnessed it to justify your moral superiority (which I doubt). Here’s an idea, instead of being hung up on the past like a programmed Marxist zombie, how about going after countries that practice slavery today. Now that would be truly socially redeeming for you. So do something useful, go after countries that still practice slavery today and let us know how you make out.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Filled out my first W2 when I was 16. Worked on and assembly line building guitar amplifiers. Took TV repair classes at night at a community college. What about yourself?

          • Bill_H2

            Went to a blue collar high school & got good grades, went to a state college and got a physics degree, worked in aerospace during the cold war, got laid off, now working in the commercial electronics industry. After working for 35 years the USG has taken a lot of my money and I want it back!

          • MrUniteUs1

            Government education and Government contracts,
            You should be thanking the government

          • Bill_H2

            The government then is not the same government we see today. You apparently did not live during the cold war, a time when America and its government worked tirelessly to contain soviet socialism. Now its suddenly OK to adopt socialism within our shores? You know that makes no sense, right. BTW How’s your war on international slavery going?

      • MrUniteUs1

        Find two Native Americans that agree with you.

        • Exsaint

          So you think everything I have was given to me simply because my ancestors came from Europe? So I didn’t really spend years of my life and tens of thousands of dollars getting an education? I don’t really get up at 3am five days a week to go to work?

          You are too much like ObaMAO with this “you didn’t build that” mentality.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Wow another ignorant post. Again who feels your head with that garbage.

          • Exsaint

            LOL! Projecting again, youngster?

        • Exsaint

          And another thing: What makes you think my family hasn’t suffered also? While Native Americans were suffering at the hands of colonists, my family was facing a similar fate in Europe. My ancestral homeland was invaded, occupied, and oppressed by the English centuries ago.

          You on the left subscribe to the racist dogma that states that whites/Europeans/Christians cannot ever be victims of discrimination. Please study some history and stop mindlessly following the MSM and leftist “intellectuals”.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Wow who filled your brain with that garbage, some right wing talk show host?

            Whites persecuted whites in Europe for at least 2,000 yeas. Romans persecuted Christian. An African Pope Victor I was able to convince Roman rulers to stop the persecution, during his years as pope. He also designated that the Resurrection be celebrated on a Sunday. Today we call the Easter Sunday. The Slavs were subjugated by
            Romans and Germanic tribes for centuries. Joan or Arc was burned at the stake.
            Puritans, Pilgrims, and Quakers fled religious persecution.
            The Salem Witch trials persecuted women. The husbands would lose their lives and property trying to save their wives from persecution. When Africans were forced on American plantation they found themselves working side by side with Irish and English indentured servants. Ever heard of WWI and WWII? I have. My uncles served during WWII.

          • Exsaint

            Through all of your rambling it is obvious that you missed my point.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Here’s your point. I proved your point wrong.

            “You on the left subscribe to the racist dogma that states that
            whites/Europeans/Christians cannot ever be victims of discrimination”

  • MrUniteUs1

    Contact ICE to report illegal aliens, employers who hire illegal labor, smugglers, document fraud, and other crimes by illegal aliens.

    Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
    Toll Free: 1 (866) 347-2423
    1-866-DHS-2ICE
    Visit ICE Website.

    http://www.endillegalimmigration.com/Report_Illegal_Immigration/

  • USARetired

    Except for the fact that our politicians are supposed to be leaders, not followers, and I see no leading when it comes to outing Obama the ‘Illegal Alien’!

  • badenguru

    The axiom about ” the truth shall set you free” drives home the painful observation that the American electorate has been repeatedly duped by the left winged media and monied interests for years. Mein Feuher Obama goose steps over us and plays the race card with impunity.

  • andrewwhitehead

    Hit the nail right square on the head. Obama isn’t fit to run a lemonade stand, let alone anything else. He had, and has, no practical experience. When it comes to statecraft or economics, he knows much less than a fifth grader.

  • shucky

    If Patton were alive, he would give crybaby Boehner something to cry about. Boehner is cowardly to the point of treason. He betrays his voters, the nation and representative government itself by not allowing a vote on impeachment.

  • Martin

    Of course it’s true. He’s a shining example of the failure of Affirmative Action policies…this time applied to the presidency.

  • http://whenfallsthecoliseum.com/author/kwatson/ megapotamus

    This may all be true in the abstract but on the issue of immigration there is a far greater problem. The Democrats in office are strongly united for open borders with a more or less extensive fig leaf. The Republicans are split at best and those who are FOR amnesty (which means open borders in practical terms) are a) firmly so for business reasons, not gauzy principles and b) the financiers of elections. Out in the fruited plains there is nothing that has been so consistently unpopular as what Obama IS doing and what half the Republicans want done. Boehner is FOR O’s actions on the merits, just against the process (wink wink). Romney, clearly is for it. He sez Obama does not go far enough! McCain is for amnesty. Graham is for amnesty. The Adelsons and yes, the Koch brothers are for amnesty. There is no solution here that does not involve fire and plenty of it. The poor of Honduras and Guatemala are about to become the super-poor of Milwaukee and Boise. And when the already swamped emergency rooms, social services, welfare and most of all, the public schools are filled with belligerent illiterates demanding (in Spanish) what they were promised by Obama and tacitly guaranteed by his lack of opposition there will be a social volcano. There is, at this point, nothing to do about it, fellow babies, except to gripe enough so that one can plausibly claim to have been against it all along. This does not include Rubio. Cruz is barely there. Elect JEB and there is no one who will believe that Republicans actually opposed open borders in any serious fashion and properly so. Nearly half of DEMOCRATS oppose Executive amnesty and immigration was the foremost issue during the midterms. This is as stark a violation of the national will as we have ever seen in this country but it is strongly bipartisan. It will not go smoothly. It will not go well. But it is already woven in the cloth. Sorry. Forward.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Very good summation.

  • http://whenfallsthecoliseum.com/author/kwatson/ megapotamus

    Forget MLK. The man was NOT for racial equality. He was as much for race-specific ‘Affirmative Action’ as Al Sharpton. Look into it, if you care. If you dare.

  • toc7

    Bill Whittle – you are AWESOME!!!

    • MrUniteUs1

      Has he ever hired an illegal immigrant. Not once does he mention the illegal employers. Does he hire illegal immigrants. Does he patronize businesses that hire illegal immigrants. The number one cause of illegal immigration are illegal employers.

  • sukietawdry

    I’ve been making this argument for years, Bill. If Ann Dunham’s son’s skin had been white, there would have been no tony prep school, no Columbia, no Harvard, no law review, no book deal, no Chicago machine patronage, no keynote address at a national convention, no promotion by an adoring press. Far from holding him back, Obama’s black skin made him. No one would have ever heard of a white Barry Dunham. It amuses me no end that Joe Biden, of all people, had his number from the get-go.

  • MrUniteUs1

    The number one cause of illegal immigration are illegal immigrant employers.
    Punish illegal employers and the problem will be solved. Let me know when here or politician take on the issue of illegal immigrant employers.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Hmm, no mention of 43 President’s White skin privilege

  • Zexufang

    Wow… Obama THE affirmative action President.
    But I am still confused: he had a white mother – how is it that he is deemed 100% black?

    • canalway

      He’s not 100% black; that’s obvious. It puzzles me too that you are considered black if you have partial black blood, DNA, whatever you call it.

      But character is character no matter what color you are. As Glen Beck once said:(paraphrased) ‘Obama’s white half sucks just as much so I’m not a racist’

  • OdinsAcolyte

    Many are ready and able to fight.
    Many are willing.
    It is in the best interest of this nation that the Feds back down and back out.
    The natives are restless.

  • MikeyDe

    The change in race relations has been underway since the first Obama inauguration. It seems that because he disregards any law that doesn’t fit his agenda, the big city African American assumes they can as well. When he brings in the racist stool pigeon Sharpton for advice, you kind of know where were headed.

  • kasandra

    I agree that one of the reasons Obama hasn’t been impeached (yet) is because how would it look if we impeached our first black (half-black) president. But there are other reasons. There was the Democrat control of the Senate that precluded a favorable result in a trial in that House of Congress. Also, I don’t think the constitution contemplated where a president acted in defiance of the constitution and laws of the United States and his party fully backed him. I think the Founders probably assumed that such a miscreant would forfeit the backing of his political party. They didn’t foresee the modern Democrat Party where the most dishonorable misconduct is approved of and concealed by the rest of the party. The Founders knew themselves to be men of integrity and, while they certainly had awareness of human vices, probably could not envision the sorry pass we’ve now come to.

  • ConcernedforAmerica

    Excellent article. Thank you for your bravery in today’s climate

  • Martin8983

    White people haven’t pushed back yet because we hope there is still time to solve these problems peacefully. When that hope is gone, we will do whatever is necessary to restore our constitutional republic. If it is inevitable I would rather start sooner than later. Given the preparedness of patriots it should be a short and violent restructuring.

  • Anthony G.

    Look, I’m a long time Republican, but when I read this dictator drivel it is offensive. Obama is lawless, Obama has done great harm to the presidency, but please, cut the dictatorship silliness.
    And the author clearly doesn’t know American history. The balance of pwoer structure wasn’t to stop a dictatorship — that sort of leader didn’t even exist at the time. If you read the Federalist papers you’d see the explanation.
    So pleas,e don’t sound like a right wing version of the Daily Koz.

    • WhoBeen

      Cut the “I’m a long time Republican” silliness…anybody who tells somebody what to do without the rule of law is by definition a dictator.
      Know your enemy ↓

  • WhoBeen

    Gruber did expose what we knew all along… The American voter is stupid! The proof is everywhere… John Boehner is still speaker, Mitch McConnell is going to be be speaker, Pelosi, Reid, Feinstein, and Schumer are still senators, Obama still lives in the White House, and John Kerry and Hillary Clinton are not in jail. What more proof do you want?

  • MrUniteUs1

    Your questions would be better directed at Whittle, and whoever decided to post the video at this website.

  • MrUniteUs1

    You understand.

  • MrUniteUs1

    How would you respond to Republican Senator Bob Corker?

    “I get really frustrated with people on my side of the aisle who say
    that anything you do on immigration is amnesty,” Corker said after a
    speech to civic groups in Columbia. “I saw it play out in these
    congressional races, where people were actually trying to solve the
    problem, and the only word people used was amnesty.”

    Corker
    challenged audience members to raise their hands if they believed the
    government would “round up 12 million people and take them back where
    they came from.”

    When no one raised their hand, Corker argued that it is incumbent on elected officials to address the issue.

    http://www.alipac.us/f34/bob-corker-r-tn-us-senate-voted-obamas-amnesty-illegal-aliens-311789/