<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrontPage Magazine &#187; David Yeagley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/david-yeagley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Even the Arabs Have Turned “Injun”</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-yeagley/even-the-arabs-have-turned-injun/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=even-the-arabs-have-turned-injun</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-yeagley/even-the-arabs-have-turned-injun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 05:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Yeagley]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab-American Discrimination Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California's Coachella Valley High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mascot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional Arab image]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=212642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arab-American Discrimination Committee protests California's Coachella Valley High School mascot.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/story.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-212646" alt="story" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/story-450x281.jpg" width="270" height="169" /></a>Arabs have now joined the protest business, imitating the American Indian mascot issue and the language of victimhood. The <a href="http://adc.org/">Arab-American Discrimination Committee</a> has protested California&#8217;s Coachella Valley High School mascot of the traditional Arab image.  That would include images of the belly dancer, the magic carpet, the saber wielding cutthroat warrior, etc. This image, of course, was chosen by the school (80 years ago) rather than the modern image of the lying, murderous <a href="http://www.badeagle.com/2013/05/16/islam-libido-unleashed-on-frontpagemagazine-com/">mayhem Muslim</a>, the cruel, self-idolizing Islamic Arab so detrimental to all free nations, so intend on humiliating, denigrating, even enslaving all other people and all other religion.</p>
<p>But &#8220;ethnic stereotyping&#8221; was the accusation levied by the ADC in their <a href="http://adc.org/fileadmin/ADC/Pdfs/ADC_CVHS_Letter.PDF">November 1, 2013 letter</a> to Dr. Darryl S. Adams, Superintendent of the Coachella Valley Unified School District.  They even protest the beautiful <i>kaffiya</i>, the headdress worn by virtually every Arab in Saudi today.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t want the Arab to be a mascot, like liberal Indians don’t want Indians being used as mascots.  This is the white liberal racial agitation training, and Arabs have picked up on it entirely, always looking to abuse American political jargon to advance their own Islamic colonization in free societies, with the intent to deny all basic freedom.</p>
<p>The Coachella Valley High School was <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/blogs/gone-viral/os-high-school-arab-mascot-draws-controversy,0,4004784.post">established in 1910</a>, about 135 miles southeast of Los Angeles, and the Arab mascot was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coachella_Valley_High_School">espoused in 1920&#8242;s</a> (or in the 1930&#8242;s) in honor of a once large Arab colony involved in the date palm growing industry there. The name was considered a gift to the Arab peoples for their contribution to the economy of the Coachella Valley and certainly not meant as a slight or insult.  As of today, of course, the school is <a href="http://high-schools.com/schools/3454/coachella-valley-high-school.html">98% Mexican-American</a>. Certainly wasn&#8217;t so in the 1920&#8242;s or 30&#8242;s.</p>
<p>The racist media instinctively leaped to support the effort to <i>change </i>the mascot.  Following every pattern created by the professional American Indian protesters (like the American Indian Movement and their leftovers), and their Communist Manifesto playbook procedures, the arrogant Arabs are throwing their <i>kaffiya</i> into the ring of racially abused minorities, and media is the primary tool accompanying the side-walk protests and published letters to authorities.</p>
<p><i>Huffington</i> puffed about the Arab mascot protest <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/02/arab-mascot-coachella-valley-high-school_n_4372780.html">on December 12</a>.  Fox news hit it earlier, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/11/07/southern-california-high-school-under-fire-for-angry-arab-mascot/">on November 7</a>, the same time <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/07/arab-team-mascot-ethnic-slur/3461059/"><i>USAToday</i> dramatized it</a>.  And a local paper in Florida even got in the act. <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/blogs/gone-viral/os-high-school-arab-mascot-draws-controversy,0,4004784.post"><i>The Orlando Sentinel</i></a> ran the story November 7.  (<i>The Sentinel</i>, however, was pleased to include photos of several Indian mascots to validate the Arab protest.)</p>
<p><i>Huffington</i> puffs:</p>
<p><i>It&#8217;s a twist on a decades-old issue that has centered primarily on Native American mascots, logos and nicknames and has transformed Indians to Cardinal at Stanford University and Chieftains to Redhawks at Seattle University.</i></p>
<p><i>But the Arab debate spurs the same set of questions: Is it possible to craft a mascot in the image of an ethnic group that doesn&#8217;t offend, or are schools better off scrapping the idea altogether?</i></p>
<p><i>The debate comes as the more familiar Indian controversy has gained increased heat.</i></p>
<p>No question about the Indian basis for this.  The Arab spiel is obviously superficial, manipulative, and hackneyed.  But, Arabs have wielded American political language to sneak in their cruel, tyrannical <i>sharia</i> for decades.  Even the “Palestinians” tried to imitate American Indian protests, even <a href="http://www.bluecorncomics.com/stype714.htm">dressing in cheap, dime-store Indian costumes</a> to emphasize <a href="http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=25175">their imagined affinity</a> with the American Indian plight.  This is all wholly denigrating to the American Indian, professional liberal or not.</p>
<p>Arabs love to intimidate, to invade, to take over, to denigrate, humiliate, and to demonstrate superiority, at any level. This is why mosques are built on formerly Jewish or Christian sites.  Great sportsmen, these murderous Arab Muslims.  There is nothing “Indian” about this.</p>
<p>The Arab, never having a reputation for peace, for mutual respect, nevertheless has a unique aesthetic, and no doubt a unique appeal to the world.  The &#8220;stereotype&#8221; that the Coachella Valley High School employs is actually the more positive image, one that accentuates the free-flowing spirit, the sensual beauty, and the appeal of natural enthusiasm and aggression. This is to say nothing of the Arab accomplishments in calligraphy, art, science, exploration, and even philosophy. But, this is all forgotten in modern times.  They stand only for fraud, deception, cruelty, and tyranny.&#8221;  Arab-Americans&#8221; would do well to reconsider their protest. The California high school is offering a romantic, pleasurable image of the Arab, much like the 1992 Disney <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aladdin_%281992_Disney_film%29"><i>Aladdin</i></a> movie.</p>
<p><b>Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: </b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&amp;field-keywords=david+horowitz&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&amp;qid=1316459840&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;sort=daterank" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a><b>.   </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-yeagley/even-the-arabs-have-turned-injun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Islam: Libido Unleashed?</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-yeagley/islam-libido-unleashed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=islam-libido-unleashed</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-yeagley/islam-libido-unleashed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Yeagley]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Religion of Peace under the Freudian microscope.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/anger1.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-189588" alt="anger" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/anger1.jpg" width="252" height="189" /></a>Islam is Freudian <i>libido</i> unleashed. Under the robes of dark religion, the system of Islam glorifies the most naked, destructive passions of human nature. Libido&#8211;undefined sexual energy—is expressed in gruesome death.  Among civilized people libido finds more tolerable expression through creative sublimation, such as art; but in Islam, sublimation is removed.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud">Sigmund Freud</a> (1856-1939), the famous Viennese Jewish psychologist, father of the “couch,” or “confessional” talk therapy, introduced a profound sexual theory in which <i>libido</i> explained what was formerly called <i>mayhem</i> and <i>cannibalism</i>.  In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Future-Illusion-Sigmund-Freud/dp/0393008312"><i>The Future of an Illusion</i></a> (1927), Freud suggests cannibalism, along with incest, was an <i>instinct</i>.  Cannibalism, always involving mayhem, is directly linked to <i>libido</i>.  In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Totem-Taboo-Sigmund-Freud/dp/1609421205"><i>Totem and Taboo</i></a> (1918), Freud describes various cases of incest, and suggests that sexual taboos develop precisely around the most powerful but self-destructive desires.  (Civilization simply harnesses or re-channels these dreadful desires.)</p>
<p>But Islam glories in removing sexual taboos. The brutality of Islam, so unprecedented in modern times, is the studied absence of civilized inhibition.</p>
<p>What inspires such horrid Islamic acts of bodily dismemberment—the beheadings, the chopping off of body parts, the compulsive delight in <a href="http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/blogs/white-coat-notes/2013/04/15/marathon-medical-tent-transformed-into-trauma-unit/gUAgQIMwTYqwzRkcIDs5PJ/blog.html">blowing to pieces</a> the human body, and the ghastly acts of cannibalism?</p>
<p><i>Libido</i>.</p>
<p>Barbarity we thought characterized more primitive man, in more primitive times.  Tribal people have always relished the grotesque.  Indulgent violence is part of what it means to be “heathen.”</p>
<p>But, according to Freud, <i>barbarity is man</i>, at any time, primordial, bizarre, and even mystical.</p>
<p>Cannibalism, as sexual desire, is the ultimate <i>union</i> of two separate entities.  Union, the coming together of separate entities, is the object of all sexual desire.  By cannibalism, two entities become one in the most literal way.  (This union accounts for the thinly sublimated cannibalism of the vampire legend, and the everlasting popularity of the Dracula story.)</p>
<p>Mayhem is only the foreplay of cannibalism.  <a href="http://newsrescue.com/maryland-us-man-charged-with-murder-admits-eating-heart-brain-of-ghanaian-victim-agyei-kodie/#axzz2T1I8B2JT">Murderers who have eaten the bodies</a> (or body parts) of their victims always dismember the body first.</p>
<p>Islam, world famous for mayhem, is also <a href="http://shoebat.com/2013/01/31/islam-and-cannibalism-updated/">famous for cannibalism</a>.  The “religion” of Islam honors <a href="http://frontpagemag.com/2013/theodore-shoebat/syria-cannibalism-and-videotape/">this very worst human denigration</a>.  (And Muslims <a href="http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/jews-again-accused-of-using-blood-in-matzah/"><i>accuse Jews</i></a><i> </i>of blood eating?  This is simply projection, with an odd twist of impotence.)</p>
<p>Islamic abuse of women, the brutal beatings, killings, and dismemberings, are normative in Islam.  On the other hand, the reward of the faithful is a harem of seventy virgins.  Islamic reality and fantasy clearly exhibit psycho-pathological conflict and perversion.</p>
<p>Islam’s notorious terrorism—a suicidal pervert’s mass-murdering slaughter—is mayhem on steroids.  Mayhem <i>en mass</i>.  <a href="http://www.aina.org/news/20130418140349.htm">Delight in this practice</a> is a clarion declaration of sexual perversion in the Freudian sense.  The “lust for killing” (mentioned in <i>The Future of an Illusion</i>) is clearly sexual in nature—demonstrated by the nature of its exhibition:  mayhem, or dismemberment.   Islamic cannibalism is but the climax of the psychological perversion.</p>
<p>Islam may also involve <a href="http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=25171">supernatural influence</a>.  Normally, sexual desire is sublimated by religious energy and its cultural accoutrements.  But, what today is called “radicalization” of a Muslim simply means the person is <i>given</i> to the libido unleashed, through the supernatural—expressed through long-established cultural modes.</p>
<p>But Freud warned the young Swiss psychologist Carl Jung (1875-1961) to keep sexual theory separate from the supernatural.  Jung recalls a conversation with Freud in 1907 (in Vienna):</p>
<blockquote><p><i>“My dear Jung, promise me never to abandon the sexual theory.  That is the most essential thing of all.  You see, we must make a dogma of it, an unshakable bulwark against the black tide of mud—of occultism.”  </i>See, C. G. Jung, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Memories-Dreams-Reflections-C-G-Jung/dp/0679723951"><i>Memories, Dreams, Reflections</i></a>, ed. Aniela Jaffé, trans. Richard Winston (1961; rpt. New York: Vintage, 1989), p.150.  Sex is more manageable than the supernatural.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So, the power of Islam is libido unleashed by the impetus of the supernatural.  It is precisely belief in the supernatural, which unleashes the libido.  It may be that all religion is liable for some degree of amalgamation with <a href="http://www.anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap0902/sacrifice.htm">unleashed libido</a>.  Indeed, Freud says as much in <a href="http://books.wwnorton.com/books/Civilization-and-Its-Discontents/"><i>Civilization and its Discontents</i></a> (1929).</p>
<p>Yet, Judeo-Christian westerners understand religion as a <i>restraint</i>.  Ancient Hebrew religion involved animal slaughter (sacrifice) for food, but modern Judaism no longer has such a ritual.  Christianity, on the other hand, aggrandizes the historical slaughter of one human being, for forgiveness, thus psychologically turning the libido on its head, and does finally allow religion to function as a restraint.</p>
<p>But Islam shows us how lethal libido is unleashed through belief in magic, in the context of barbarous cultural identity with historical, collective support.</p>
<p><strong>Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&amp;field-keywords=david+horowitz&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&amp;qid=1316459840&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;sort=daterank" target="_blank">Click here</a>.  </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-yeagley/islam-libido-unleashed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>262</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sundance, Soros and Robert Redford&#8217;s Double Life</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-yeagley/sundance-soros-and-robert-redfords-double-life/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sundance-soros-and-robert-redfords-double-life</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-yeagley/sundance-soros-and-robert-redfords-double-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Yeagley]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Redford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance Film Festival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=120220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long, hypocritical career of an America-hating actor. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/219705-robert-redford.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-120355" title="219705-robert-redford" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/219705-robert-redford.gif" alt="" width="375" height="252" /></a></p>
<p>After a life of self-contradiction, has Robert Redford, at 75, become an impossible thinker?  He has always condemned America, and yet made movies that epitomize and aggrandize American stereotypes.  What are the effects of <a href="http://www.badeagle.com/2005/01/28/redford-all-american-commie/">a long-lived double life</a>?</p>
<p>Redford opened the <a href="http://www.sundance.org/festival/">2012 Sundance Festival</a> with a speech reeking rancor and self-righteousness.  He faithfully <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/20/robert-redford-hits-mitt-romney-sundance_n_1218561.html?ref=entertainment">condemned Republicans, Mitt Romney, and the United States.</a>  He lauded the Third World and its European leaders.  It’s classic Redford—malcontent, contumacious, and <a href="http://www.badeagle.com/2005/01/28/redford-all-american-commie/">ever anti-American. </a> It is religion to him.</p>
<p>His recent “encyclical” of individualism, first published in the liberals’ <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/20/robert-redford-hits-mitt-romney-sundance_n_1218561.html?ref=entertainment">Huffington Post</a>, was picked up by the Third World papers immediately. From the ArabTimes to the <a href="http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Robert-Redford-slams-GOP-candidates-and-Mitt-Romenys-mushroom-cloud-of-ego-137884713.html?">IrishCentral</a>, the havens of American envy resounded Redford’s perpetual discontent.</p>
<p>At least Redford has been consistent in his long range rancor.</p>
<p>A Communist <a href="http://www.badeagle.com/2005/02/20/the-real-redford/">seemingly from birth</a>, Redford nonetheless starred in films dramatizing everything American, from baseball to American Indians.  He always took the individualistic angle, though, which expressed his actual aversion toward the subject he portrayed.</p>
<p>For example, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Johnson_%28film%29"><em>Jeremiah Johnson</em></a> (1972), he starts out typically condemns the war with Mexico, and takes to the mountains, like the true anti-social, anti-American he is.  Yet, he also takes the role of the great White Conqueror—the war-loving conservative&#8211;<a href="http://www.badeagle.com/2005/01/12/is-redford-indian-friendly/">toward American Indians</a>.  He marries an Indian woman, but then kills many Indian men.  His brawn is so intimidating that he frightens off a fat Indian warrior just by looking at him.  In other words, sex with a non-white race is okay, as long as you kill their men.  That’s the macho thing.  And we all know Redford is all about macho.   What could be more macho than to kill Indians, yet scoff at America?</p>
<p>Such macho-ism is an established political position among would-be cultural heroes of Communism.  It is a socially articulated embodiment of adolescent immaturity. Communistic from his adolescent years, Redford found a platform in which his “individualism” could be politically effective, and yet preserve some semblance of legitimacy and cause.  Redford has always lived this double life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-yeagley/sundance-soros-and-robert-redfords-double-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street: Cowardly, Stenchy and Undeveloped</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-yeagley/occupy-wall-street-cowardly-stenchy-and-undeveloped/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=occupy-wall-street-cowardly-stenchy-and-undeveloped</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-yeagley/occupy-wall-street-cowardly-stenchy-and-undeveloped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Yeagley]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hippies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the sixties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woodstock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=109531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the '60s hippie movement, irresponsibly juvenile as it was, had focus and a sense of romantic purpose. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/filth.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-109536" title="filth" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/filth.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>The “Occupy Wall Street” gatherings are not only infantile, but fail  to reach any semblance of cultural history, unless mass public  defecation and fornication in New York City is something new.</p>
<p>Even the ’60′s hippie movement, irresponsibly juvenile as it was, had  focus and a sense of romantic purpose.  The degenerates of that age had  their actual music, their poetry, their spokesmen.  That wave of public  immaturity left memorabilia. They were genuine tokens, not tweets,  videos, or ubiquitous and cheap electronic record so consumptive today.</p>
<p>Wall Street “bastards” have left nothing but their own waste.  They  are like children who have literally had no upbringing but TV, internet,  and Sesame Street.  There is no sentiment to carry their emotion,  because the emotion is ugly, uninspiring and unworthy.  They have no  songs, no lyrics, but only infantile outrage and meaningless anger at  existence.  They resent their birth.  (Of late, some drum groups have  evolve–from sheer boredom, no doubt; but this only demonstrates more  accurately the utter lack of mind and intellect involved.  This is as  primitive as the public can be, without words, without thought, without  purpose.  Just primal rage.)</p>
<p>The hippies of the ’60′s had a feeling of genuine exploration,  deconstructive as it was.  (It simply hadn’t happened before in American  culture.)  But the moment cannot be relived.  All such imitations are  doomed, for historical circumstances are essentially inimitable.   Therefore, the Occupiers are lost, and without direction.  Social  circumstances and the political situation is different today.  The level  of public maturity is far less.  And even a Canadian-based anarchy  movement will not suffice to give meaning to the pathetic “useful  idiots” in the street.</p>
<p>The hippies had one or two major events of public exposure.  They displayed their body functions in the open.  But, they were <a href="http://woodstock.com/themusic.php">in the woods</a>, not in public parks in the middle of crowded cities.  They called it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodstock_Festival">Woodstock</a>, not Wall Street.  They wanted to drop out, in a way.  The Occupiers want to destroy.</p>
<p>But the Occupiers are not stronger, or more aggressive.  They are  cowardly, in fact. Or, just undeveloped. Occupy Wall Street is a kind  fetal 9-11.  Perhaps we can expect to seem them advised by their more  violent Muslim brethren in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-yeagley/occupy-wall-street-cowardly-stenchy-and-undeveloped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 506/542 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 09:06:40 by W3 Total Cache -->