<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrontPage Magazine &#187; Jeff Dunetz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/jeff-dunetz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 07:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Olympic Committee On Munich Moment of Silence Refusal: &#8216;Muslims Tied Our Hands&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/jeff-dunetz/olympic-committee-on-munich-moment-of-silence-refusal-muslims-tied-our-hands/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=olympic-committee-on-munich-moment-of-silence-refusal-muslims-tied-our-hands</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/jeff-dunetz/olympic-committee-on-munich-moment-of-silence-refusal-muslims-tied-our-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Dunetz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moment of silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich Massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=137708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failing to do the right thing because of Islamic intimidation. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Picture-3.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-137741" title="Picture-3" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Picture-3.gif" alt="" width="375" height="265" /></a>Originally published at <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/07/olympic-comittee-on-moment-of-silence.html?utm_source=The+Lid+List&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=83a7c15c8b-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN">YidWithLid</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Ankie Spitzer whose husband was murdered by Palestinian terrorists during the 1972 Munich Olympics has been fighting to have a minute of silence at the London Games to remember the eleven murdered victims.</p>
<p>Her efforts have been supported by the governments of much of the western world, but they <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/07/40-years-after-munich-massacrethe-ioc.html">have been rejected by the International Olympic Committee.</a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.ejpress.org/article/60269">The organisation </a>and its president Jacques Rogge have been subject to intense criticism from across the international community for its continued refusal to honour the 11 Israel Olympians murdered at the 1972 Munich Games with a minute’s silence to mark the 40th anniversary of the killings, in what has been presented as a “humanitarian” gesture.</p>
<p>Munich widow Ankie Spitzer spearheaded the campaign by launching an online protest, which has since garnered support from across political spectrums in several countries including Israel, Canada, the UK, Australia, the US, Belgium and Germany.</p>
<p>In the latest development, some 140 Italian parliamentarians signed a letter to Rogge this week, calling for minute’s silence to be instituted.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ankie wrote a letter to Olympic officials requesting and an official silence to mark the 40th anniversary of the Munich Massacres, which said in part:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Silence is a fitting tribute for athletes who lost their lives on the Olympic stage. Silence contains no statements, assumptions or beliefs and requires no understanding of language to interpret.”</p>
<p>Rogge’s succinct response declared that &#8220;within the Olympic family, the memory of the victims of the terrible massacre in Munich in 1972 will never fade away.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Spitzer, earlier this year when the two met in person <strong>Rogge protested his inability to act saying his hands were tied by admission of 46 Arab and Muslim members to the IOC. “No,” Spitzer she responded, “my husband’s hands were tied, not yours.” </strong></p>
<p>In 1972 when the massacre took place, the IOC refused to delay or cancel the games to recognize the murder of the eleven Israeli athletes. Forty years later,  the International Olympic Committee has reconfirmed its message to the world. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18640141">Jewish blood doesn&#8217;t matter </a>&#8211;we will not do what&#8217;s right because we are afraid of upsetting anti-Semites in the Muslim world.</p>
<p><strong>Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&amp;field-keywords=david+horowitz&amp;rh=n%3A133140011%2Ck%3Adavid+horowitz&amp;ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&amp;qid=1316459840&amp;rh=n%3A133140011%2Ck%3Adavid+horowitz&amp;sort=daterank">Click here</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/jeff-dunetz/olympic-committee-on-munich-moment-of-silence-refusal-muslims-tied-our-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MJ Rosenberg Relies on Anti-Semitic Steroetypes To Argue His Anti-Israel Positions</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/mj-rosenberg-relies-on-anti-semitic-steroetypes-to-argue-his-anti-israel-positions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mj-rosenberg-relies-on-anti-semitic-steroetypes-to-argue-his-anti-israel-positions</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/mj-rosenberg-relies-on-anti-semitic-steroetypes-to-argue-his-anti-israel-positions/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Dunetz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Right to Exist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[righttoexist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=121382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps when he was a child, MJ Rosenberg&#8217;s parents beat him with an Israeli flag, or maybe the first time he visited the Holy Land he tripped and got a &#8220;boo-boo&#8221; on his knee, or maybe an Israeli doctor unnecessarily removed his tonsils, just like President Obama said doctors do it all the time. The [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps when he was a child, MJ Rosenberg&#8217;s parents beat him with an Israeli flag, or maybe the first time he visited the Holy Land he tripped and got a &#8220;boo-boo&#8221; on his knee, or maybe an Israeli doctor unnecessarily removed his tonsils, just like President Obama said doctors do it all the time. The way he continually blasts Israel there must have been some horrible event in his childhood that caused the intense hatred he has for the Jewish state.</p>
<p>Understand, I am not talking about the fact that Rosenberg disagrees with Israeli policies&#8211;that is his opinion and he is entitled to it. But he presents his disagreement with such vitriol, such twisting of the facts that it makes one wonder if a scientist in Israel invented a cure for cancer, would MJ Rosenberg blast that scientist for putting the chemotherapy drug manufactures out of business?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/4663628180_a97d4229bf_z.jpg"></a><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/41OWfDiD4wL._SS500_.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121386" title="41OWfDiD4wL._SS500_" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/41OWfDiD4wL._SS500_.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Rosenberg just loves to use anti-Semitic buzzwords to show his distaste for the Jewish state. He talks about the &#8220;pro-Israel lobby,&#8221; a nice way to say that the Jews control the government. He complains that you can’t write anti-Israel pieces in the media, a nice way to say the Jews control the media. And he likes to substitute the word &#8220;neocon&#8221; as a nice way to say &#8220;those dammed Jews.”</p>
<p>This is not to say that MJ is one of those &#8220;self hating Jews”&#8211;honestly I believe it&#8217;s worse than that. He understands that generally, the progressive left is anti-Israel and the progressive media is his bread and butter. So in order to prove his loyalty to the progressive media he acts with venom toward Israel and stereotypes his own people. Rosenberg is just trying to show his progressive handlers that MJ stands for Malign Jews.</p>
<p>I personally crossed Rosenberg&#8217;s writing path twice, in the matter of Chas Freeman, President Obama’s pick for NIC chairman who was a tool for both the Saudi and Chinese government, and in the matter of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, the former AIPAC staffers who were <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/05/bush-administration-abuse-of-power.html">wrongly charged</a> with espionage (the charges were <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/05/news-flash-aipac-case-dropped.html">dropped this year</a>). In both cases, Rosenberg’s strategy was to attack people personally, throw around the “N” word (neocon), twist words around (<a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/02/mj-rosenbeg-just-bully-with-internet.html">including mine)</a> and accuse those of us who differ from his point of view as hell-bent to run the foreign policy of the United States of America (Heck, like most husbands, I don&#8217;t even have a say in running the foreign policy of my household.)</p>
<p>The biggest joke was his accusation that the &#8220;powerful Israel lobby&#8221; was behind the removal of Chas Freeman. Actually it was mostly the work of two people, one of which was me, and I will take a lie detector test if necessary to prove that my control of anything is minimal.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/lob.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121388" title="lob" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/lob.png" alt="" width="431" height="538" /></a></p>
<p>Let me give you some more recent examples of what I am talking about.</p>
<p>In a recent piece he wrote for his primary employer, <del>George Soros</del> Media Matters, he claimed that the reason for the Egyptian rebellion is that the Jews have blunted all efforts to resolve the <a href="http://politicalcorrection.org/fpmatters/201101280006">Israeli/Palestinian issue</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If one needs additional proof that the <strong>&#8220;pro-Israel&#8221;</strong> lobby and the policies it dictates to U.S. policymakers are bad for both the U.S. and Israel, look no further than what is happening in Egypt.</p>
<p>The regime that the Israeli government and its <strong>U.S. lobby </strong>have depended upon to enforce the status quo is going down. It is not clear when, but it&#8217;s going to be soon, much sooner than anyone ever anticipated. And you can be sure that any democratic government that takes Mubarak&#8217;s place is not going to play the role of America&#8217;s (let alone Israel&#8217;s) enforcer in the Middle East. …Of course, no one would even be worried about the peace treaty if the Israelis had agreed to implement the critical second part of the Camp David Accords.</p>
<p>That was the part that would have ended the occupation. But the Israelis chose to ignore<strong> it and the lobby and the ever-faithful Congress blocked Carter&#8217;s efforts to push it through</strong>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes MJ works for <del>George Soros</del> Media Matters and loves Jimmy Carter; if that&#8217;s not abandoning reason to endear himself to the progressive mainstream I don&#8217;t know what is. But forgetting about his motivation for a moment, look at what he said: it&#8217;s all Israel&#8217;s fault and the Jews made Congress roadblock Carter. Did pro-Israel supporters put pressure on Congress during the Carter administration? Not being involved at the time I couldn&#8217;t tell you for sure, but I suppose they did. I am also sure that it was no more pressure than other interests groups put on congress and a hell of a lot less than the influence that groups such as organized labor put on the Obama administration today, or the pressure that Arab oil nations put on Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Secretary of State Clinton, whose husband makes about $12 million a year from Arab interests.</p>
<p>There are hundreds of interest groups roaming the halls of congress and the administration offices every day, each trying to convince government officials to go their way everything from unions and abortion rights to OPEC and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Rosenberg&#8217;s meme of the all-powerful pro-Israel (Jewish) lobbyists is simply a polite way of exploiting horrible stereotypes to argue his cause. Did he ever think that maybe Congress objected to what Carter was doing because, I don&#8217;t know, it was the right thing to do for America, that even back then Israel was a strong ally who protected Israel’s interests?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/carterl_jew_hater.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121389" title="carterl_jew_hater" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/carterl_jew_hater.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="258" /></a></p>
<p>When he talks about Israel being the &#8220;roadblock&#8221; Rosenberg is <del>twisting the facts</del> using selective memory. Does he really forget that at the end of the Clinton administration and again at the end of the Bush administration, Israel offered the Palestinians a deal that would have given them 98% of what they wanted and both times, first Arafat and then Abbas walked away from the deal?</p>
<p>For Malign Jews Rosenberg, facts are an inconvenient thing. In that same article Rosenberg said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I am often accused of harping on the lobby&#8217;s baleful influence. I plead guilty. But it&#8217;s my obligation because (1) I know from personal experience — 15 years on Capitol Hill and four at AIPAC — how it operates, (2) I know how little it really cares about Israel, and (3) <strong>I am free to tell the truth about it. If I worked in the mainstream media or in the U.S. government, I wouldn’t be</strong>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>How do you like that&#8211;according to MJ those Jews control U.S. foreign policy and the run the media. I wonder why he left out the banks and Hollywood? Rosenberg must keep a copy of the handbook for Jewish fear-mongering, <em>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion</em>, on hand with him at all times because he uses the same stereotypes.</p>
<p>This week Mr. Rosenberg is doubling down on his Jewish stereotypes and Israel bashing with a column in the Huffington Post, which is appropriate as that progressive site happens to be one of the most <a href="http://hpmonitor.blogspot.com/">anti-Semitic hate sites</a> on the Internet. Rosenberg <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mj-rosenberg/top-neocon-faults-obama-f_b_828620.html">begins with</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It has been a week since the United States vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution opposing Israeli settlements. You can&#8217;t help but wonder if the Obama administration is now having second thoughts.</p>
<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ed-forum23_McClo_0503004855_part6.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121390" title="ed-forum23_McClo_0503004855_part6" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ed-forum23_McClo_0503004855_part6.jpg" alt="" width="370" height="246" /></a></p>
<p>Forget the policy ramifications of the veto: that it badly damaged America&#8217;s chances of facilitating negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians and that it further alienated the United States from the Arab and Muslim world at a critical moment in history. Lay aside that the veto cut the Israeli peace camp off at the knees while vindicating Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu&#8217;s policy of never giving an inch to the Palestinians (or to the Americans). And, obviously, don&#8217;t even think about the hypocrisy of the United States voting against its own long-standing policy on settlements.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><!-- @font-face {   font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { color: purple; text-decoration: underline; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } --> Again let’s forget for a second, MJ&#8217;s obvious factual errors like this resolution did not match the Obama <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/02/obamas-passive-aggressive-un-israel.html">administration policy</a>, the fact that Israel offered a 10-month freeze and Abbas still refused to come to the table until that freeze was 9 1/2 months old, or even the fact that it is the Palestinian side, not Israel who refuses to come to the table. Instead lets take a look at his prose:</p>
<blockquote><p>No. Focus instead on the domestic politics because, after all, the U.S. opposed the resolution in order to guard President Obama from attacks by the right wing of the pro-Israel community, that small minority of the community whose mantra is &#8220;Bibi, right or wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>For some reason the administration believed that vetoing the resolution would appease that crowd. That belief is responsible for over two years of vacillation on the issue of Israeli settlements (the key issue thwarting negotiations).</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><!-- @font-face {   font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { color: purple; text-decoration: underline; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } --> Ah so it isn&#8217;t all the Jews, it’s only the right-wing Jews who push the other Jews to go their way before they arm-twist the President and Congress to abandon all reason and support Israel. This is the President who lost his majority in the House because he didn’t care what the majority of the entire U.S. voting public thought about his health care bill, but he is going to allow his arm to be twisted by a<strong> small minority</strong> of the Israel Lobby (Jews). Think about that for a second, even if all Jews thought the same way (a physical impossibility&#8211;trust me) according the <a href="http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/tables/11s0077.pdf">U.S. Census Bureau</a> Jews represent about 2.1% of all Americans. Does he really believe that a small minority (his description) of an interest group representing 2.1% of the population can force the president to act one way, when depending on the poll up to 65% of the population couldn&#8217;t stop him from pushing through Obamacare? Who does he think he is kidding?</p>
<blockquote><p>But here is what the Obama administration does not understand about the politics.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Bibi, right or wrongers&#8221; are not Obama supporters and will not be voting for him in the next election. They certainly will not be sending him campaign contributions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Ah, MJ is channeling former Secretary of State James Baker, who once said &#8220;F&#8212; the Jews, they won&#8217;t vote for us anyway!&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Why would they? They did not support Obama in 2008, largely because they did not believe that anyone named <strong>Barack Obama </strong>could ever share their skewed view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And, as the 2009 Cairo speech demonstrated, he doesn&#8217;t. He supports Israel but believes &#8212; and he has said this often &#8212; that supporting Israel requires ending the occupation and establishing a Palestinian state in the occupied territories.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Now he is saying that Jew who opposes Obama does so because of his name, his heritage.  We are racists, who knew?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Just before the last Presidential Election, I wrote a series of articles on different topics suggesting to readers why they should not vote for Barack Obama.  One called <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2008/11/election-plea-to-those-who-love-israel.html">An Election Plea To Those Who Love Israel,</a> outlined the reasons why Israel supporters should not vote for the man who would become the POTUS. The primary reason was that he assembled himself a list of advisers some of whom had a background of being anti-Israel, the rest had a background of being anti-Semitic <strong>and </strong>anti-Israel. I predicted that an Obama administration may very well overtake the administration of George H.W. Bush as the most anti-Israel in history (IMHO Bush was worse than Carter). Sadly my prediction may be very well turn out to be true.</p>
<blockquote><p>Unfortunately, the lobby and a few of his advisers seem to have convinced him that being true to his beliefs will cost him in the 2012 election. Hence the veto.</p>
<p>Obama has the politics wrong. According to the 2010 American Jewish Committee poll (the largest and most respected poll of the Jewish community&#8217;s political attitudes) 64 percent of Jewish voters favor the dismantling of all or some of Israeli settlements. Obviously, that 64 percent will not be lost to Obama for condemning settlement expansion.</p>
<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/jimmy_carter_turkey.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121395" title="jimmy_carter_turkey" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/jimmy_carter_turkey.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="374" /></a></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">I agree with Mr Rosenberg that the majority of Jews will vote for Obama  in 2012, but it has little to do with his stance on Israel and lots to do with the fact that  Jews tend to vote liberal. He will not, however, come anywhere close to the numbers he got in 2008 and that too, has little to do with his stance on Israel.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Since I began to vote for POTUS, the Democratic Party candidate  that received the smallest portion of Jewish voters was Jimmy Carter&#8217;s reelection bid (55%). Here&#8217;s the little secret that Rosenberg can&#8217;t get through his biased head. I know it&#8217;s shocking, but Israel isn&#8217;t he only reason why Jews vote for a candidate.  I voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 not because of Carter&#8217;s position on Israel but because he was incompetent, he &#8220;lost&#8221; Iran and Zimbabwe, and totally destroyed the economy remember those days of 13.5%<span style="color: black;"> inflation, 7% unemployment</span> and an economy that can only be described as near death? It was called stagflation. That was the reason Carter tanked in the Jewish community. And if I am correct in predicting a similar skew for the Jewish vote in 2012, only a small part of it will be because of his passive aggressive treatment of Israel, the main reason will be because of his destruction of the economy, reckless spending and a naive foreign policy that has alienated most of our closest allies including Britain, France and Germany.</p>
<blockquote><p>So who might be impressed by the veto? People who will be supporting Romney, Huckabee, Palin or whoever the GOP nominates in 2012.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/02/20/how-pro-israel-is-obama-assessing-the-post-veto-fallout/">This</a> appeared in<strong> Commentary &#8212; the bible of the neoconservatives</strong> &#8212; and was written by its editor, Jonathan S. Tobin. Tobin, although not well known, is a leading voice in the &#8220;Israel can do no wrong&#8221; chorus.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Well there he goes again, Commentary describes itself as a <a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/about/">Jewish publication, </a>but then again, Malign Jews Rosenberg believes that Neoconservatives is a polite way to say &#8220;Them Damnned Jews&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>C<small>OMMENTARY</small> is America’s premier monthly magazine of  opinion and a pivotal voice in American intellectual life. Since its  inception in 1945, and increasingly after it emerged as the flagship of  neoconservatism in the 1970s, the magazine has been consistently engaged  with several large, interrelated questions: the fate of democracy and  of democratic ideas in a world threatened by totalitarian ideologies;  the state of American and Western security; the future of the Jews,  Judaism, and Jewish culture in Israel, the United States, and around the  world; and the preservation of high culture in an age of political  correctness and the collapse of critical standards.</p>
<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/TnrCover_7-8-10.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121397" title="TnrCover_7-8-10" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/TnrCover_7-8-10.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="538" /></a></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you wanted to call a magazine  &#8220;The Bible of the Neoconservatives&#8221; I would suggest The New Republic, whose famous Editor, Marin Peretz is  part of what Rosenberg would call the &#8220;Netanyahu right or wrong&#8221; group, was one of the first Jewish supporters of Obama. In fact it was Peretz&#8217;s blessing along with that of former NYC Mayor Ed Koch that convinced some &#8220;on the fence Jews&#8221; to vote for Obama.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">After saying that the Jews run the Congress, Presidency and press and saying that our Presidential selections are based primarily on Israel, MJ changes course by saying</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;. President Obama received close to 80 percent of the Jewish vote in the last election and will do just as well next time. There is no chance that the president will lose that support just because he promotes policies that advance U.S. interests by promoting peace.<strong> To think otherwise is to suggest that American Jews are something less than Americans. And that is a damnable lie.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Again ignoring his debatable point as to whether Obama&#8217;s policy is good for America, MJ and I are in total agreement with one point, suggesting that American Jews are something less than Americans is a damnable lie. But suggesting that we are this nefarious cabal whose domination of American foreign policy is only outmatched by our control of the media and our propensity to vote as a block is an even bigger and more damnable lie.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">To be honest I wish that Mr. Rosenberg had the confidence in his own positions to argue based on facts rather than trying to trash the Jewish people. He might even draw some people over to his side. That, however, might be impossible, I suspect that if he had the facts to back up his stereotypes he would use them, but in his case, as in the case of many like him, facts are a difficult roadblock to overcome.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4524408241564223";
/* 250x250, created 11/5/09 */
google_ad_slot = "9418300237";
google_ad_width = 250;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/mj-rosenberg-relies-on-anti-semitic-steroetypes-to-argue-his-anti-israel-positions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 7 Lamest Charges of Anti-Semitism Directed At Glenn Beck By Media Matters and The George Soros Left</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/the-7-lamest-charges-of-anti-semitism-directed-at-glenn-beck-by-media-matters-and-the-george-soros-left/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-7-lamest-charges-of-anti-semitism-directed-at-glenn-beck-by-media-matters-and-the-george-soros-left</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/the-7-lamest-charges-of-anti-semitism-directed-at-glenn-beck-by-media-matters-and-the-george-soros-left/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Dunetz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Right to Exist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[righttoexist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=116793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From their perspective, Media Matters'  targeting of Glenn Beck is almost understandable, after all the radio host/TV commentator has been warning people how the progressive agenda is a danger to American freedom for a long time. He has also been exposing, George Soros, also known as "Spooky Dude" who is the Sugar Daddy for much of the progressive movement, including Media Matters.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From their perspective, Media Matters&#8217;  targeting of Glenn Beck is  almost understandable, after all the radio host/TV commentator has been  warning people how the progressive agenda is a danger to American  freedom for a long time. He has also been exposing, George Soros, also  known as &#8220;Spooky Dude&#8221; who is the Sugar Daddy for much of the  progressive movement, including Media Matters.</p>
<p>What Media Matters doesn&#8217;t like to talk about is the fact that Soros is a major funder of the organization, most of the funding is indirect. Three different Soros charitable foundations, individual members of the Soros family, and the Geosor Corporation  give hundreds of millions of dollars to The Open Society Institute (see page 18 of the Institute&#8217;s nonprofit tax return <a href="http://gridney.tripod.com/sorostt35open.pdf">posted here).</a> Open Society gives money to the Center for American Progress who gives money to Media Matters.  Another Soros funded group that helps Media Matters is the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/16/AR2006071600882.html">Democracy Alliance</a>, and recently Soros gave a large and public chunk of money to Media matters, calling it the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/press/releases/201010200018">&#8220;first ever&#8221; donation </a>by the  financier (except for all the other I suppose). Keep in mind that Media Matters is not required to list its donors, this information comes from the tax returns of the foundations that give it money, so there may be other donations not discovered.</p>
<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/pants-on-fire.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-116838" title="pants on fire" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/pants-on-fire.jpg" alt="" width="523" height="408" /></a></p>
<p>Media Matters  attacks on Beck have reached almost comic proportions&#8212;an incredible  obsession.  A search of Media Matters on site search engine reports the  Soros-controlled media police posted 2,460 anti-Beck posts between  January 4, 2010 and October 5th (the day before they began their  strategy of trying to brand the Commentator as a Jew-hater.  Let that  number roll around in your mind for a second–2,460 posts in 274  days–that’s an average of nine posts a day and (if he didn’t miss a TV  or radio show) 13 posts per program.  It was obvious that either Media  Matters and Mr. Soros had it in for Glenn Beck or someone has some sort  of kinky crush on the Fox star.<span id="more-116793"></span></p>
<p>Media Matters began a &#8220;Glenn Beck has a Jewish Problem&#8221;  hit job in October when the  the commentator dedicated a program to outlining George Soros’ political network and exposing Spooky Dude’s history of currency manipulation and it continues through today with the bogus charges of 400 rabbis, blessed by Media Matters and promoted by the Progressive mainstream media.</p>
<p>False charges of Antisemitism are a particular hot button of mine. As a Jew, every time I hear someone being bullied with false charges of Antisemitism I an compelled to offer a defense (usually that deflects the bully’s anger toward my direction).</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean I reject all charges of Antisemitism. When charges are valid I just vigorously attack the bigot, such as when my friend Rabbi Nessenoff asked me what to do with this little video he took of Helen Thomas. I quickly posted it on my site<a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2010/06/helen-thomas-says-jews-should-get-hell.html"><strong> The Lid,</strong></a> at <a href="http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/06/04/helen-thomas-jews-should-get-the-hell-out-of-palestine-and-go-back-to-germany-and-poland/"><strong>Big Journalism</strong></a>, gave it to Scott Baker who at the time was running <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/helen-thomas-tells-jews-get-the-hell-out-of-palestine-and-go-back-to-germany-poland/"><strong>Breitbart TV</strong></a> ,  sent out tweets and emails to most of the large sites.  By the end of the day it was on radio and TV and the calls for Thomas’ head were all over the place, and my friend Rabbi Nessenoff&#8217;s face was all over the media.</p>
<p>In the case of Media Matters and Sugar-Daddy George&#8217;s progressive hit squad, branding Beck as Antisemitic was a brilliant strategy at times they brought back memories of the <em>All in the Family</em> episode where Mr. Rabinowitz, Archie Bunker&#8217;s attorney advised,</p>
<blockquote><p>In a court of law, you can’t beat a station wagon filled with nuns!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Though in the case of Soros progressive hit squad, it was an open letiled with 400 Rabbis.</p>
<p>Thankfully the attempt to brand Glenn Beck as an anti-Semite isn&#8217;t working for two reasons. First of all and most importantly it&#8217;s not true.  As a regular listener of Beck&#8217;s radio show and a semi-regular viewer of his TV offerings, if there was the slightest hint of Antisemitism coming out of the Fox broadcaster&#8217;s mouth I would be attacking him relentlessly. Just as I continue to attack people like  WFAN&#8217;s Mike Francesa and his former partner Chris Russo, <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2010/09/when-wfan-am-ny-sports-radio-reacted-to.html">who reacted to 9/11 by calling for Jews to take a loyalty oath</a>.</p>
<p>The other mistake made by the Soros hit team lead by Media Matters was over reach. The few months have seen some of the the lamest allegations of Antisemitism made since biblical times, when God told Abraham to leave the Mesopotamian City of  Ur the land of his birth, his kindred and his father’s house, move to the Holy Land to create the first “Jewish neighborhood.”</p>
<p>These, in my humble opinion are the lamest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/the-7-lamest-charges-of-anti-semitism-directed-at-glenn-beck-by-media-matters-and-the-george-soros-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups Whose Quotes Used By Soros Group to Attack Glenn Beck, Repudiate Anti-Beck Effort</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/groups-whose-quotes-used-by-soros-group-to-attack-glenn-beck-repudiate-anti-beck-effort/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=groups-whose-quotes-used-by-soros-group-to-attack-glenn-beck-repudiate-anti-beck-effort</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/groups-whose-quotes-used-by-soros-group-to-attack-glenn-beck-repudiate-anti-beck-effort/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Dunetz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Right to Exist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[righttoexist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsrealblog.com/?p=116104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few days, three of the groups used to corroborate the false charges raised by Jewish Funds For Justice have repudiated the letter arraigned by the George Soros proxy.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carried in the January 27th edition of the Wall Street Journal was an  advertisement/open letter from four-hundred Rabbis organized by a  socialist Jewish organization called Jewish Funds for Justice (JFJ),  with strong ties to financier George Soros (the full ad is embedded at  the bottom of <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/01/jewish-funds-for-justice-goes-after.html">this page</a>).  As <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/01/jewish-funds-for-justice-goes-after.html">discussed the day the ad came out,</a> the rabbis efforts brought shame upon themselves, their holy profession  and the entire Jewish people, and even worse have committed a Chillul  Hashem (desecration of God&#8217;s name). A <a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/01/glenn-beck-400-slanderous-rabbis-part.html">conversation with one of the signers, Rabbi Steven Wernick ,</a> the day after my initial post raised more questions (which as of this moment the Rabbi still hasn&#8217;t answered).<span id="more-116104"></span></p>
<div><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/jffad.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-116105" title="jffad" src="http://www.newsrealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/jffad.jpg" alt="" width="546" height="426" /></a></div>
<p>That however, is the not the end of the story.  Over the past few days,   three of the groups used to corroborate the false charges raised by   Jewish Funds For Justice have repudiated the letter arraigned by the   George Soros proxy. All three weren&#8217;t contacted prior to the use of   their names, disagreed with the thrust of the letter and were not happy   that they were included. A fourth came out and said the letter was too   one sided.  Not surprisingly  the only group/person not raising some   objection to the letter has an association with George Soros.</p>
<p>To find out which groups repudiated the Jewish Funds For Justice/400 Rabbis slander of Glenn Beck and what they said, <strong><a href="http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/02/4-out-of-5-groups-cited-in-anti-glenn.html">CLICK HERE.</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/jeff-dunetz/groups-whose-quotes-used-by-soros-group-to-attack-glenn-beck-repudiate-anti-beck-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 486/489 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 07:12:06 by W3 Total Cache -->