<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrontPage Magazine &#187; Ted Belman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/ted-belman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 07:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Why Is Obama in Bed with the Muslim Brotherhood?</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/ted-belman/why-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-muslim-brotherhood/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-muslim-brotherhood</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/ted-belman/why-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-muslim-brotherhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Belman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim brotherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=123994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Unholy Alliance on full display.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Obama_and_MB_logo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-123997" title="Obama_and_MB_logo" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Obama_and_MB_logo.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="333" /></a><strong>This <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/why_is_obama_in_bed_with_the_muslim_brotherhood.html">article</a> is reprinted with permission from <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/why_is_obama_in_bed_with_the_muslim_brotherhood.html">The American Thinker</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Dr. Essam Abdallah, an Egyptian liberal intellectual, in an <a href="http://www.israpundit.com/archives/40883">article</a> published last October in the leading liberal pan-Arab journal Elaph, refers to certain reports coming out of Washington:</p>
<blockquote><p>These reports reveal the depth of the below-the-surface coordination between the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iranian regime and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Libya and Jordan. This bloc of regimes and organizations is now becoming the greatest Islamist radical lobby ever to penetrate and infiltrate the White House, Congress, the State Department and the main decision making centers of the US government. All of this is happening at a time when the US government is going through its most strategically dangerous period in modern times because of its need to confront the Iranian Mullahs regime, which is expanding in the Middle East, as well as penetrating the United States, via powerful and influential allies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Abdallah alleged that &#8220;the popular revolts in the Arab world &#8212; and the Obama Administration&#8217;s position towards them &#8212; were determined by political battles between various pressure groups in Washington.&#8221;</p>
<p>He followed up with another <a href="http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=53331&amp;pageid=44&amp;pagename=Slices">article</a> this month in which he asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>[W]hy isn&#8217;t the West in general and the United States Administration in particular clearly and forcefully supporting our civil societies and particularly the secular democrats of the region? Why were the bureaucracies in Washington and in Brussels partnering with Islamists in the region and not with their natural allies the democracy promoting political forces?</p></blockquote>
<p>Steve Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism said of this article: &#8220;This is one of the most important articles I have read in years.&#8221;  He then made <a href="http://www.israpundit.com/archives/43675#more-43675">allegations</a> of his own:</p>
<blockquote><p>It was just revealed two days ago that FBI Director Mueller secretly met on February 8 at FBI headquarters with a coalition of groups including various Islamist and militant Arabic groups who in the past have defended Hamas and Hizballah and have also issued blatantly anti-Semitic statements. At this meeting, the FBI revealed that it had removed more than 1000 presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices around the country that was deemed &#8220;offensive.&#8221; The FBI did not reveal what criteria was used to determine why material was considered &#8220;offensive&#8221; but knowledgeable law enforcement sources have told the IPT that it was these radical groups who made that determination. Moreover, numerous FBI agents have confirmed that from now on, FBI headquarters has banned all FBI offices from inviting any counter-terrorist specialists who are considered &#8220;anti-Islam&#8221; by Muslim Brotherhood front groups.</p></blockquote>
<p>This comes as no surprise to me.  In August of 2011, after making the case, I <a href="http://www.israpundit.com/archives/38826">wrote</a>, &#8220;To my mind, the alliance between the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood is the cornerstone of Obama&#8217;s New Middle East policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The most damning bit of evidence was reported by Herb London in his article, &#8220;<a href="http://www.israpundit.com/archives/38753">U.S. Betrays Syria&#8217;s Opposition</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>In an effort to understand and placate Syrian opposition groups, Secretary Clinton invited them to a meeting in Washington. Most of those invited, however, have links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Missing from the invitations are Kurdish leaders, Sunni liberals, Assyrians and Christian spokesmen. According to various reports the State Department made a deal with Turkey and Muslim Brotherhood representatives either to share power with Assad to stabilize the government, or replace him if this effort fails. One organization, the Syrian Democracy Council (SDC), an opposition group composed of diverse ethnic and religious organizations, including Alawis, Aramaic Christians, Druze and Assyrians was conspicuously &#8212; and no coincidentally &#8212; omitted from the invitation list.</p></blockquote>
<p>Caroline Glick <a href="http://www.israpundit.com/archives/38468">wrote</a> in August of last year:</p>
<blockquote><p>What these observers fail to recognize is that Erdogan&#8217;s interests in a post-Assad Syria have little in common with US interests. Erdogan will seek to ensure the continued disenfranchisement of Syria&#8217;s Kurdish minority. And he will work towards the Islamification of Syria through the Muslim Brotherhood.</p>
<p>This week Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held a private meeting with these brave democrats. Why didn&#8217;t she hold a public meeting? Why hasn&#8217;t Obama welcomed them to the White House?&#8221;</p>
<p>Today there is a coalition of Syrian opposition figures that include all ethnic groups in Syria. Their representatives have been banging the doors of the corridors of power in Washington and beyond. Yet the same Western leaders who were so eager to recognize the Libyan opposition despite the presence of al Qaeda terrorists in the opposition tent have refused to publicly embrace Syrian regime opponents that seek a democratic, federal Syria that will live at peace with Israel and embrace liberal policies.</p>
<p>By refusing to embrace liberal, multi-ethnic regime opponents, the administration is all but ensuring the success of the Turkish bid to install the Muslim Brotherhood in power if Assad is overthrown.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Syrian Democratic Coalition (SDC), above mentioned, is self-described thus:</p>
<blockquote><p>The <a href="http://www.sdcsyria.com/" target="_new">Syrian Democratic Coalition</a> (SDC) is an emerging coalition of diverse Syrian organizations coming together to help bring an end to the Assad regime and promote the transformation of Syria into a secular democracy based in liberty. The coalition is founded upon a belief in the separation of religion from state and is dedicated to establishing a new constitution and transparent federal republic in Syria, based in reason that equally protects minority rights, promotes gender equality, and embraces the rights and liberties of every individual as enumerated in the United Nations Declaration for Human Rights. This growing coalition crosses all ethnic, religious and tribal lines to represent all Syrians. It currently includes members of <a href="http://www.savesyrianow.com/" target="_new">Save Syria Now!</a>, the Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria, the Union of Syrian Arab Tribes and the Syrian Christian Democratic Movement.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sherkoh Abbas is secretary general of the Syria Democracy Council and president of the Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria.  I first met him when he invited me to be a director of the American Kurdish Friendship League some five years ago.</p>
<p>Recently, he confided in me that in all his dealings with the State Department over the last two years, no interest was shown in his coalition, and instead, he was continually pressed to support the Syrian National Council (SNC), made up of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists and Arabists.  He believes that the U.S. is working with Salafi groups, and the Turkish government, to create an opposition in Syria that is strictly Islamist.  Such an opposition would serve Turkish economic interests in Syria and keep the Kurdish issue dormant in Turkey as well as in Syria.</p>
<p>For the last six months at least, Obama has been cultivating a relationship with PM Erdoğan of Turkey.  The budding relationship prompted Barry Rubin to ask, &#8220;<a href="http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42636">Why Is an Anti-American Islamist, Obama&#8217;s Favorite ME Leader?</a>&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/ted-belman/why-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-muslim-brotherhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Holds Netanyahu at &#8216;Gunpoint&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/ted-belman/obama-holds-netanyahu-at-%e2%80%9cgunpoint%e2%80%9d/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-holds-netanyahu-at-%25e2%2580%259cgunpoint%25e2%2580%259d</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/ted-belman/obama-holds-netanyahu-at-%e2%80%9cgunpoint%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Belman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=110629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The intense pressure is pushing Israel into self-destruction.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/obama-netanyahu-4.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-110635" title="U.S. President Obama and Israel's PM Netanyahu meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/obama-netanyahu-4.jpg" alt="" width="427" height="275" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Reprinted from <a href="http://www.israpundit.com">IsraPundit.com</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Before forming the present government PM Netanyahu stood for the following:</p>
<ol> &#8211; no two state solution<br />
- no Shalit trade as was then being negotiated<br />
- no construction freeze and<br />
- no presentation of an Israeli plan for its borders</ol>
<p>Since taking office he violated all these supposed red lines. He gave  a speech in which he accepted “two states for two peoples”.  He made  the Shalit trade he previously had opposed. He imposed a 10 month freeze  for nothing in return and in many ways imposed a de facto freeze.</p>
<p>And now, it appears he has agreed to present, <a href="http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=243403"><strong>“comprehensive proposals”</strong></a> for resolving key aspects of conflict within three months.</p>
<p>By agreeing to this and not rejecting the peace process, Israel is  accepting negotiations which aim to bridge the gap. Netanyahu has thus  crossed another red line.</p>
<p>Netanyahu inherited the Shalit negotiations and once complained that he  was dealt a lousy hand as though he couldn’t have started all over  again. Similarly, he is not prepared to start all over again on peace  negotiations and is prepared to play with the hand he was dealt. It too  is a lousy hand.</p>
<p>By Netanyahu formally agreeing to present such proposals, he confirms  that he is following Olmert and Barak.  This is something Bibi has  repeatedly said he would not do just as he has always said he is against  the Shalit deal.</p>
<p>This goes way beyond playing rope-a-dope to buy time. This shows a  seriousness about negotiations and an intention to really negotiate  along the dictates of Obama and his proxy, the Quartet.</p>
<p>Netanyahu has to ask for more than he expects to get, yet on  the other hand, if he asks for too much the Quartet will say he is not  serious and penalize him/Israel for it. Not for a moment, do I believe that this was his idea or that he willingly went along.</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/bloggish/item/knesset_visitor_blasts_obama_netanyahu_20110920/"><strong>Knesset visitor blasts Obama and Netanyahu</strong></a> advises that MK Eldad accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of  buckling under intense pressure from President Barack Obama, who wants  to prevent any Israeli retaliation against the Palestinian Authority in  its bid to win recognition as a state from the United Nations.</p>
<ol> He (Eldad) charged that Obama was holding Netanyahu “at gunpoint” –  the gun being the U.S. threat to go back on its promise to veto the  Palestinian statehood bid in the UN Security Council.Specifically, Obama has demanded that Netanyahu and Israel’s  supporters in the United States pressure Congress to abort two pending  resolutions to penalize the Palestinian Authority (PA) if it pursues its  bid, Eldad claimed.One would shut off U.S. aid funds to the Palestinians and a  second would support Israel’s right to annex the West Bank. The legal  justification for such actions, cited by many Israeli officials, would  be that the unilateral statehood request would be a direct violation of  the 1993 Oslo Accords.</ol>
<p>The inescapable conclusion is that Bibi felt he had no choice but to  agree with the Quartet’s new Plan in which they proposed that the  parties meet for a month and then prepare proposals within the following  three months. To my mind the Quartet would not have come out with their  plan, at that time, had not Bibi agreed to it.</p>
<p>The Palestinian request for recognition is still with the UNSC and  will not be voted on or vetoed until Bibi presents his plan. So Eldad  was 100 % correct.</p>
<p>Diplomacy being what it is, the Quartet will do its utmost to get  Bibi to better Olmert’s offer.  Abbas had offered to allow Israel to  keep much less land.  Abbas wanted to keep Ariel and much of east  Jerusalem including Maaleh Adumin. When Netanyahu formed his government  he made it clear that in no way would he match Olmert’s offer. I don’t  see how he can avoid it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/ted-belman/obama-holds-netanyahu-at-%e2%80%9cgunpoint%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 390/393 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 07:08:52 by W3 Total Cache -->