<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrontPage Magazine &#187; Yedidya Atlas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/yedidya-atlas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Smoke and Mirrors on the Campaign Trail</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/smoke-and-mirrors-on-the-campaign-trail/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=smoke-and-mirrors-on-the-campaign-trail</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/smoke-and-mirrors-on-the-campaign-trail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=132803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Romney must do to break through the fog. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/obama-romney-split.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-132846" title="obama-romney-split" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/obama-romney-split.gif" alt="" width="375" height="246" /></a>In his April 18<sup>th</sup> column for RealClearPolitics, Senior Elections Analyst Sean Trende notes that the upcoming presidential elections between the incumbent, Democratic President Barack Obama, and his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, will be, as usual, “a referendum on the party in power.” That is, President Obama will be running, whether he wants to or not (and he clearly doesn’t), on his performance record.</p>
<p>Considering Mr. Obama’s poor presidential performance, particularly in the key area of the economy, he will have a difficult time selling his self-trumped-up success in turning around the economy since the great crash in September 2008 – the very crash that leveraged him into the White House (“everything is Bush’s fault”) – no matter what is written on his cue cards.</p>
<p>Without a doubt, Team Obama agrees, and their strategy is a combination of Mr. Obama running as if he isn’t the incumbent (“everything is always someone else’s fault” – President Bush, Congress, the Republican majority in the House, anybody and everybody who isn’t Barack Obama), and at the same time, trying to impugn the good name and record of his Republican challenger, Mr. Romney, so the voters will prefer Mr. Obama by comparison.</p>
<p>This explains the Bain Capital ads and other similar attacks. But, like everything else Team Obama has tried in the last two months, this strategy seems to have backfired. Even Obama supporter Newark Mayor Cory Booker, speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press” this past Sunday, said, “I have to just say from a very personal level, I&#8217;m not about to sit here and indict private equity. To me, it’s just, we&#8217;re getting to a ridiculous point in America. Especially,” declared Mayor Booker, a Democrat, “that I know I live in a state where pension funds, unions and other people invest in companies like Bain Capital. If you look at the totality of Bain Capital&#8217;s record, they&#8217;ve done a lot to support businesses, to grow businesses.”</p>
<p>Pronouncing “this kind of stuff” to be “nauseating to me…[and] to the American public,” Mayor Booker put it succinctly. “It undermines…what this country should be focused on. It’s a distraction from the real issues.”</p>
<p>Of course, what the Newark mayor doesn’t realize is that creating a “distraction from the real issues” is what it is all about. Such ad campaigns are not by accident. Team Obama is deliberately trying every trick in their campaign book to divert attention from the president’s record in office by throwing irrelevant matters in the face of the electorate – who they condescendingly believe are too stupid to realize what they are doing – and squeak first past the finish line come November.</p>
<p>It is the task of Mr. Romney and his campaign team to keep the focus of the public on the real issues. To hammer away at Mr. Obama’s failures, and in essence, to force the mainstream media to do their job and not be so easily sidetracked by smoke and mirrors. Mr. Romney has to repeat and repeat, again and again, his own clear vision for handling the critical issues facing the American people. By doing so, it will not only push the media to focus accordingly, it will also force Team Obama to have to try and explain away the incumbent’s flip-flops, outright lies, and his administration’s failed domestic and foreign policies.</p>
<p>Since the primary concern of all Americans is the economy, it should be noted that Mr. Obama has, as one pundit put it, “been missing in action with respect to confronting the skyrocketing national debt.” He appointed a bipartisan commission to propose solutions to the looming budgetary crisis, and then summarily ignored its recommendations. Even in his first two years in office, when his own party dominated both houses of Congress, he failed to get Congree to pass a budget, and now, although the Republicans control the House, Mr. Obama’s proposed budget was still rejected 0 to 99 by the Senate, even with its Democratic majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/smoke-and-mirrors-on-the-campaign-trail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel: Why Land Matters, Part III</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-iii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=israel-why-land-matters-part-iii</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli Defense Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tel Aviv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=132117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The importance of maintaining strong borders. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mideast-articleLarge.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-132118" title="mideast-articleLarge" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mideast-articleLarge.gif" alt="" width="375" height="249" /></a>It is an undisputed fact that Israel’s army reserves are the backbone of the IDF in times of war. The question, therefore, is: how does Israel buy the 48 hours it must have to fully mobilize and deploy its army reserves?</p>
<p>Israel’s citizen army naturally mobilizes its reserve troops where they live. This means primarily an “L” shaped land mass, from Jerusalem at one end and Haifa at the other with Tel Aviv in the middle. Along this short and narrow strip resides some 70 percent of Israel’s population (and 80 percent of its industrial base) and therefore, about 70 percent of the nation’s reserve soldiers (as well as 70 percent of its labor force).</p>
<p>Even before Israel has the opportunity to field the full complement of its army, including its reserves, in time of war, Israel must prevent this area from being overrun by an invading enemy. Should the enemy forces succeed in cutting into the “L”, the damage to Israel’s mobilization and deployment process might well be beyond repair. Worse, if the invasion force cannot be stopped before the fighting reached the main cities, Israel would have lost the war.</p>
<p>This grave situation is recognized by Israel’s military, even if not fully grasped by all its politicians. In 1952, IDF Chief of Operations General Yitzhak Rabin ordered IDF Chief of Planning Colonel Yuval Ne’eman (who helped organize the IDF into a reservist-based army, developed the mobilization system, and wrote the first draft of Israel’s defense doctrine) to conduct an exercise to test the IDF under conditions of a surprise attack, under the then-prevailing 1949 ceasefire lines, i.e. the pre-’67 lines known today as the “Green Line.”</p>
<p>The maneuvers were organized, and the ensuing results were a disaster. During the exercise, Israel’s first president, Dr. Chaim Weizman, passed away. The exercise was then cancelled to deal with the State funeral that had to be carried out. However, by that time the exercise’s “invading force” had conquered Petach Tikva and Ramat Gan, two cities surrounding the approach to Tel Aviv proper (the distance from the pre-’67 ceasefire lines to the outskirts of metropolitan Tel Aviv is a mere 11 miles), and had yet to be stopped in its tracks. It is this nightmarish situation that hung over Israel’s neck like the Sword of Damocles until the 1967 Six Day War and the extension of Israeli control over the Biblical mountain ranges of Judea and Samaria.</p>
<p>Imagine further, how much worse in reality the results of the 1952 exercise could have been if Israel’s enemies, large and small, added to the invasion force barrage after barrage of missiles onto Israel’s main population centers.</p>
<p>The “Land for Peace” concept, accepted and unquestioned in Western capitals (and by Israel’s political Left), if implemented, would seriously weaken Israel, even clearing the path to its ultimate destruction. The areas already given over to the control of the Palestinian Authority (and now also Hamas) has considerably complicated Israel’s defense in an all out war situation. Further territorial concessions would prove catastrophic.</p>
<p>The missile age has not made strategic depth irrelevant, it has made it even more vital. The advanced weapons systems and missiles now in the hands of the Arabs, make the threat of the reduction of Israel’s size back to pre-’67 dimensions potentially devastating. Permitting such a diminution would also be a foolhardy move on the part of the Western democracies. A truncated Israel, forced to concentrate all its defenses on high-population areas, would effectively become useless to those it currently serves so well as a major linchpin in the Western global strategy against the threat from radical Islamic expansionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel: Why Land Matters, Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-ii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=israel-why-land-matters-part-ii</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[six day war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=132068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lessons from the past.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Yesha-topographical-map-in-Hebrew.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-132069" title="Yesha-topographical-map-in-Hebrew" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Yesha-topographical-map-in-Hebrew.gif" alt="" width="375" height="252" /></a></p>
<p><em>Editor&#8217;s note: To read Part I of this three-part article series, click <a href="http://frontpagemag.com/2012/05/14/israel-why-land-matters-part-i/">here</a>. </em></p>
<p>Conceding Israeli control of the 34-mile-wide area known as Judea and Samaria to any of Israel’s actual or even potential enemies means a return to the pre-1967 nine-mile waistline across Israel’s coastal strip and a security border of 223 miles to patrol and defend. Retention of said territories means a mere 62 miles of security border to patrol and defend. It also means Israeli control of vital mountain passes, the 4,200-foot high ground overlooking the Jordan Rift Valley, and the minimal strategic depth between the Jordan River and Israel’s highly populated and industrialized coastal plain.</p>
<p>To comprehend why this is so important to Israel’s security, it is necessary to understand the difference between Israel before mass mobilization and afterwards.</p>
<p>When Israel fights a war, it must take into account many factors: weapons technologies, tactical knowledge, motivation and education of the soldiers, etc. However, the prime factor is still numbers. The best equipped and most superiorly trained army cannot win if it is hopelessly outnumbered. This has always been an issue for Israel.</p>
<p>The IDF, as every responsible army, must be prepared for every eventuality. Israel cannot afford to lose a war. According to reports, the latest annual IDF General Staff exercises dealt with various combinations of possible attacks from different fronts including south (Gaza and Egypt), north (Lebanon and Syria) and east (Iran). Other possibilities were also taken into account, but those were the major ones.</p>
<p>In each of these possibilities, strategic depth is a critical factor. In the south, Israel has already given up its strategic buffer areas, and if the IDF were to fail to take the battle into enemy territory (basic IDF doctrine), the fighting would be within easy range of major Israeli population centers.</p>
<p>In the north, the Golan Heights are, as always, critical, and in the northeast and east, Judea and Samaria are not only vital for defense, but would also serve as passage ways for mobilization and logistics. (The Cross-Samarian Highway, for example, was originally planned by the IDF General Staff following the 1967 Six Day War as the major connecting artery to the Jordan Valley from the coastal plain.)</p>
<p>Despite the immense security risks Israel faces, the Jewish State’s small population means it doesn’t have the security of a large standing army despite the immense security risks it faces. For that reason, soldiers who have completed their mandatory service, continue in the reserves – especially in combat units – well into their forties, contributing up to over a month or more of service each year for both training and active-duty assignments. In short: the army reserves constitute the backbone of the IDF’s manpower needs.</p>
<p>IDF doctrine encompasses a number of basic security truths. Among them are that Israel cannot afford to lose a single war, we must have a credible deterrent posture including territorially, and that the outcome of war must be determined quickly and decisively. Proper preparation means Israel’s small standing army must be equipped with an early-warning capability, coupled with an efficient reserve mobilization and deployment system.</p>
<p>Israel, prior to mobilization, is basically a relatively weak country militarily in terms of all out war with more than one front involved – which is a distinct possibility that the IDF planners seriously take into account. Post-mobilization Israel, on the other hand, is an entirely different story.</p>
<p>Israel has the potential to mobilize hundreds of thousands of reserves which more than triples the manpower of the Israeli army. This considerably alters the ratio against the enemy. While exact figures are classified, suffice to say the combined Arab armies outnumber Israel’s standing army by a ratio of approximately 15 to 1. Whereas after a full scale call-up of Israel’s reserves, the ratio is reduced to less than 4 to 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel: Why Land Matters, Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-i/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=israel-why-land-matters-part-i</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palestinians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=131949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fatal flaw of the peace process. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/nasaisrael.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-131951" title="nasaisrael" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/nasaisrael.gif" alt="" width="375" height="246" /></a>In the years that followed the 1967 Six Day War a prevailing conventional wisdom developed among Western policy makers – especially in Washington &#8212; that simultaneously contends that a “strong and secure Israel” should have, as per UN Resolution 242, “secure and recognized boundaries” or simply “defensible borders,” yet nonetheless calls on Israel to make unilateral territorial concessions (today’s PC term is a return to the pre-’67 lines with “mutually agreed land swaps”) as part of an ultimate peace settlement with its Arab neighbors.</p>
<p>Strangely few perceive the inherent contradiction between the call for a “strong and secure Israel” and the call to give up the very territory that would – at minimum – comprise said strength and security.</p>
<p>This was the case with Egypt, for example. More than 30 years ago, Israel gave up the entire Sinai Peninsula, including its vast strategic depths and bottleneck passes as well as the Abu Rodeis oil fields, which supplied Israel more than half its energy needs and would have made Israel energy independent within a few short years more than 30 years ago. And this is also the case today with the Palestinian Arabs. As long as there are Palestinian Arabs willing to take territory from Israel even without any quid pro quo from their side, Israel is expected to unilaterally give up its most strategically critical territory.</p>
<p>Israel, without the administered territories, is a strategically crippled country. These areas, known historically as Judea and Samaria and labeled “the West Bank” following the Jordanian occupation of said territories in 1949, are the key to Israel’s strategic strength against any attack from the east (Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, et al.). An Israel with control of these territories is a strategic asset to the West in defense against radical Islamic expansionism no less, if not more, than during the Cold War period when Israel was the West’s reliable bulwark against Soviet expansionism in the Middle East.</p>
<p>Up until the late 1980s, following the outbreak of the so-called “Palestinian uprising” or “first intifada,” everyone viewed the security threat to Israel to be solely by conventional Arab armies who, to quote the late Egyptian President Nasser, wished to “drive the Jews into the sea.” In the following two decades, with the vast increase of terrorist attacks and the introduction to the missile age, it appeared that conventional war no longer threatened Israel’s existence per se. And if the threat was primarily terrorism and missiles fired from afar, territory with its high ground and strategic depth no longer seemed as important. From the standpoint of Israel’s national security, however, this is a misconception. Territory is not only still vital for national defense, it is even more so than previously.</p>
<p>There is a basic premise: <strong>Israel’s security can be discussed only in terms of national survival</strong>. It is necessary to understand the price Israel pays if she unilaterally gives up more of these territories and what she benefits by their retention.</p>
<p>Given the three potential threats of missile attacks, terrorism, and conventional warfare, Israel must retain a safety zone with the aforementioned high ground and strategic depth to deal with any potential future threats &#8212; even if political agreements are signed with its Arab neighbors. Israel cannot afford to bet its survival on signed agreements while giving up critical tangible physical strategic assets. Israel needs to maintain the ability to defend itself under any and all possible circumstances. (Given the Muslim/Arab history for not keeping agreements with non-Muslims, this is not mere whimsy.)</p>
<p>The key question Israeli policy makers must ask themselves: If Israel were attacked by a combination of a conventional Arab army, ballistic missiles, and terrorist bands, would a truncated border with its lack of strategic depth be sufficient for the IDF’s small standing army to successfully repel the invaders and do so with minor damage to Israel’s national infrastructure? Or to be blunt: Could Israel survive such an attack in the event of an all-out war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/israel-why-land-matters-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jerusalem: The Heart &amp; Soul of the Conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/jerusalem-the-heart-soul-of-the-conflict/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jerusalem-the-heart-soul-of-the-conflict</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/jerusalem-the-heart-soul-of-the-conflict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerusalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mecca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temple mount]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=125948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exposing the Palestinian cause to de-judaize the mostly religiously important Jewish city. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/western-wall-jerusalem-day-33.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-125954" title="western-wall-jerusalem-day-33" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/western-wall-jerusalem-day-33.gif" alt="" width="375" height="250" /></a>Last month Qatar hosted representatives from Islamic countries attending the &#8220;International Conference for the Defence of Occupied Jerusalem.” Supposedly they convened to discuss “the legal status of Jerusalem before and after the Israeli occupation, the reality and the future of Jerusalem under occupation, and the status of the holy places under international law.” The real reason, the Islamic reason, was to perpetuate the lie that Jerusalem is not Jewish.</p>
<p>It was no surprise that PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, the notorious Holocaust denier, or Arab League Secretary-General Nabil al-Arabi, whose organization’s 22<sup>nd</sup> summit in 2010 approved the conference, among other Muslim political luminaries, attended. It was even par for the course that the UN representative Robert Serry attended to give official UN backing to the Big Lie on Arab-Muslim Jerusalem. Nor was it a bombshell that Kenneth Insley, Jr., who was listed as “consultant” to the US Department of State, attended also delivering a speech in support of the aforementioned Islamic mythological history of Jerusalem. (To date, the State Department has failed to explain whether or not Mr. Insley, a known promoter of anti-Israel hatred, was there on behalf of the US government as the conference billing listed him.)</p>
<p>But the primary thrust of the conference was just another in a long line of Islamic attempts to throw the sands of confusion and deception in the minds eyes of Western policy makers and the Western media. The purpose: to cause the aforementioned Western fellow travelers to participate and support the Islamic re-writing of Jerusalem’s history.</p>
<p>The reason that Jerusalem is so important to Muslims is because it actually is important to the Jews. After all, when East Jerusalem with the Old City and the Temple Mount was occupied by the Arab and Islamic Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan from 1949 until 1967, Jerusalem was not important to the same Arab/Islamic leaders who subsequently shed crocodile tears over the loss of Jerusalem following Israel’s liberating Eastern Jerusalem in the 1967 Six Day War. During the 19 years of Jordanian occupation, for example, the King of Saudi Arabia, PLO chieftain Yasser Arafat, et al., never once visited Jerusalem, never felt the need to go up to the Temple Mount and pray at the mosque. Moreover, those Muslims who do pray at the “al-Aqsa Mosque” built on the Temple Mount turn their backs to the mosque and face Mecca. Why? Because Jerusalem, as we will see from a brief historical review, means nothing per se to Muslims except in relation to the city’s importance to their declared enemies: Jews and Christians, those “People of the Book.”</p>
<p>Anyone who is conversant at all with Biblical history and archeology, as well as more than three millennia of Jewish law and traditions, knows the unique and central role Jerusalem plays in Judaism. Jews have always prayed towards Jerusalem, and in Jerusalem, they pray towards the Temple Mount. Jews have mourned the destruction of both the First and Second Temples for upwards of 2,000 years, and pray daily for the ultimate rebuilding of the Third Temple in Messianic times. The Passover Hagaddah (also read by President Obama in the White House, according to his latest AIPAC speech), as does the Yom Kippur service, concludes with the phrase, “Next year in Jerusalem.” One of the 18 benedictions in the primary Jewish prayer (the “Amida” or “Shemona Esrei”) recited three times daily by religious Jews is the prayer to return and rebuild Jerusalem as of old. Since the days of King David, Jerusalem has been the capital of the Jewish state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/jerusalem-the-heart-soul-of-the-conflict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran and Obama&#8217;s Delaying Game</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/iran-and-obamas-delaying-game/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=iran-and-obamas-delaying-game</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/iran-and-obamas-delaying-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afternoon Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=122503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Treating the Islamic Republic like a Chicago neighborhood waiting to be engaged is a recipe for disaster.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/4901635286_98f88ca044_z.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-122506" title="4901635286_98f88ca044_z" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/4901635286_98f88ca044_z.gif" alt="" width="375" height="250" /></a></p>
<p>In the three years since President Obama has been in office he has attempted to “engage” Iran, invoke “sanctions” with multiple loopholes, and sign into law even “tougher sanctions” too late to be relevant. While he has “removed nothing from the table” – a euphemism for military action – it nonetheless appears that the administration, by its terminal foot dragging, neither wants to attack Iran under almost any circumstances, nor wants Israel to attack.</p>
<p>In an interview last week, Mr. Obama said that he did not believe that Israel had made a final decision to attack Iran, and wouldn’t attack without first coordinating with the US. He added that Israel and America were “in lockstep” on the Iranian issue. Really?</p>
<p>Recently another in a series of administration orchestrated leaks was released to NBC News by unnamed “US officials” claiming that deadly attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists are being carried out by an Iranian dissident<strong> </strong>group that is financed, trained and armed by Israel’s secret service. Why the US would publicize such an unsubstantiated allegation, true or not, makes no sense unless the point is to damage Israeli freedom of action.</p>
<p>This week, President Obama announced an additional sanction on Iran: the freezing of the Iranian government’s assets in the US. But it was another in Obama’s sleight of hand purported sanctions against Iran. At this stage, Obama still refuses to accept the Senate’s decision, passed by a majority of 100-0, to impose paralyzing sanctions against Iran’s central bank and its oil industry. With time running out, Mr. Obama is still playing the delaying game while giving a false impression to his gullible supporters – especially liberal American Jews – that he is supposedly doing everything to stop Iran short of military attack.</p>
<p>The harsh truth is that President Obama and his policy advisors have gone into ostrich mode and collectively stuck their heads in the sand.  Aside from the fact that the purportedly “tougher sanctions” demanded by Israel to avoid the necessity of armed conflict with Iran should have been implemented years ago, it is questionable whether such sanctions would stop Iran’s clerical leadership from pursuing their path to creating a nuclear arsenal.</p>
<p>Sanctions didn’t stop North Korea and the Korean mindset is somewhat closer to the West. Mr. Obama and his advisors appear incapable of comprehending with whom they are dealing. As Professor Niall Ferguson recently noted in The Daily Beast, there are those who believe “a nuclear-armed Iran is nothing to worry about….[and] States actually become more risk-averse once they acquire nuclear weapons.” This wishful thinking prefers to view Iran as if it were the Soviet Union during the Cold War and the threat of MAD – Mutually Assured Destruction – is still a viable alternative.</p>
<p>Professor Bernard Lewis, the doyen of Middle East historians for more than half a century, put his finger on the problem in his keynote address at the international Jerusalem Conference back in 2008: “Iran&#8217;s leadership comprises a group of extreme fanatical Muslims who believe that their messianic times have arrived,” he warned.  “Though Russia and the US both had nuclear weapons, it was clear that they would never use them because of MAD.  Each side knew it would be destroyed if it would attack the other.  But with these people in Iran,” Professor Lewis explained, “MAD is not a deterrent factor, but rather an inducement.  They feel that they can hasten the final messianic process. This is an extremely dangerous situation of which it is important to be aware.”</p>
<p>Iran’s Shi’ite theocratic leadership headed by its “Supreme Leader” the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his acolyte, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, sincerely believe that this is the apocalyptic age, which will result in the triumphant return of their messianic figure, the Twelfth Imam, or “the Mahdi.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/iran-and-obamas-delaying-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Are the &#8216;Syrian People&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/who-are-the-syrian-people/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=who-are-the-syrian-people</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/who-are-the-syrian-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alawite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim brotherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=121654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton again leads the international community in helping a Muslim Brotherhood-led movement gain power. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012_2thumbimg105_Feb_2012_170434520-ll.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-121695" title="2012_2$thumbimg105_Feb_2012_170434520-ll" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012_2thumbimg105_Feb_2012_170434520-ll.gif" alt="" width="375" height="252" /></a></p>
<p>Speaking at the UN Security Council last week Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared, “It is time for the international community to put aside our own differences and send a clear message of support to the people of Syria.” And the day after the Security Council vote with Russia and China vetoing the resolution to adopt the Arab League plan, a frustrated Mrs. Clinton repeated her call to “support the Syrian people&#8217;s right to have a better future.”</p>
<p>The problem of Mrs. Clinton and others who express such concern for the ongoing internecine violence in Syria is that they constantly issue pronouncements about the “Syrian people” as if it was a homogeneous national grouping. Her ignorance was further demonstrated when speaking to reporters during a visit Sunday in Bulgaria. She said: “the international community had a duty to halt continuing bloodshed and promote a political transition that would see Mr. Assad step down.” Can she honestly believe Basher al-Assad will simply agree to resign?</p>
<p>If one is to ever develop a coherent and attainable goal-oriented Syrian policy, one first has to understand the various groupings and allegiances at play.</p>
<p>The “Syrian people” is a composite of religious and ethnic groups who historically oppose each other. The dominant group, approximately two thirds of the population are Sunni Muslims; 12 percent are Alawites; 9 percent are Kurds; 10 percent are various Christian sects (Arab Christians, Assyrians and Armenians); and the remainder are a hodgepodge of religio-ethnic groups including Druze, Turkmens and Circassians.</p>
<p>Let’s focus on the Sunni, the Alawites and the Kurds. The Sunni majority includes the Muslim Brotherhood. It is subjugated by the ruling Alawites led by the al-Assad family. The Sunni majority, which lost power in the takeover of Syrian rule by the Alawite-dominated secular nationalist Syrian Baathist Party in a 1963 coup, began to cause increasingly violent unrest led by the Muslim Brotherhood. This later developed into open revolt.</p>
<p>In 1980, after an assassination attempt against President Hafez al-Assad failed, he came down on them like a ton of bricks, literally. In 1982, the city of Hama, a Muslim Brotherhood stronghold, was destroyed by regular Syrian army forces, including tanks and artillery, commanded by Rifat al-Assad, Hafez’s younger brother. An estimated 20,000 residents of Hama were killed. The revolt was quelled and the Alawite al-Assad family continued to rule.</p>
<p>However, the real dispute goes way back. The Sunni majority view the Alawite minority as heretics. The Alawites, or Alawi as they called themselves because of their adherence to Ali (the Muslim prophet, Mohammad’s cousin and son-in-law), were originally called by the Sunnis the “Nusayri” after the Shi’ite Ibn Nusayr in the 9<sup>th</sup> century, indicating their break with Islam. After 1920 and French rule in Syria (which included Lebanon), the persecuted Alawites ingratiated themselves with the new rulers.</p>
<p>The French encouraged Alawites to join the French-commanded Syrian army and dominate the officer corps as a counterweight to the hostile Sunni majority. This subsequently set the stage for the Alawite dominance of the Baath Party and the 1963 takeover of the Syrian government.</p>
<p>The Kurds, while only 9 percent of the total Syrian population, comprise the majority of the Jazira province, and are affiliated with major Kurdish populations in neighboring Iran, Iraq and Turkey. Historically, the Kurds once ruled their own land known as Kurdistan which included eastern Turkey, northern Iraq, northwestern Iran and northern Syria. The Kurds in all of these countries are persecuted by the current ruling regimes in their respective countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/who-are-the-syrian-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Media and the Palestinians&#8217; Big Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/the-media-and-the-palestinians-big-lie/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-media-and-the-palestinians-big-lie</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/the-media-and-the-palestinians-big-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afternoon Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=118611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How bad journalism covered up the Palestinian Authority's history of hate.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Nazi_Palestinians.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-118614" title="Nazi_Palestinians" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Nazi_Palestinians-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>In mid-December, Palestinian Media Watch brought a troubling fact to the the attention of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. One of the recipients of UNESCO&#8217;s largesse, the Palestinian Authority-funded youth magazine <em>Zayzafuna</em><em>,</em> had <a href="http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&amp;doc_id=6019">glorified Adolf Hitler</a> in an essay appearing in its recent issue.</p>
<p>In the essay, Hitler tells a young girl in her dream that he killed the Jews &#8220;so you would all know that they are a nation which spreads destruction all over the world. And what I ask of you is to be resilient and patient, concerning the suffering that Palestine is experiencing at their hands.&#8221; In her dream, the girl then thanks Hitler for his advice.</p>
<p>PMW’s expose prompted the American Ambassador to UNESCO, David Killion, to issue his own condemnation of the piece on December 22: &#8220;UNESCO must let the Palestinian Authority know that this double-speak, using a message of peace for the international community, and another message for domestic consumption that teaches hatred, is unacceptable.” He then called on Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO, to investigate whether UNESCO funding was still being used to sponsor this Palestinian magazine &#8212; and, if so, to end the international community&#8217;s financing of such hatred. The next day UNESCO announced that they were pulling their funding of the magazine.</p>
<p>Up until this point, it seems a fairly straightforward story. But then the plot thickens. Caught in a crystal-clear PR disaster, the Palestinian Authority’s spokesman claimed that the PA did not approve of such anti-Semitic messages. As the most basic survey would reveal, this was a bald-faced lie. But apparently, no matter how obvious and easily checkable a Palestinian lie is, one can rely on the mainstream media to publish it without scrutiny.</p>
<p>It began with Associated Press. The AP put out its story on December 23 on UNESCO’s “strong condemnation” and its canceling of the funding. But, following standard journalistic procedures, it received a response from the other side, in this case the Palestinian Authority, which sponsors the youth magazine. What was not following standard journalistic procedures was reporting the official PA statement without either checking its validity.</p>
<p>Thus the AP reported that “a spokesman for the Palestinian Authority, Ghassan Khatib, said the article was ‘not acceptable.’” Not only did the AP fail to check the accuracy of this statement, but it went on to faithfully report Khatib’s absurd claim that the Palestinian Authority goes out of its way to “educate young people in our textbooks about the Holocaust and the massacres of Hitler against Jews and against others, and we refer to these massacres as crimes against humanity.”</p>
<p>This would have been the place to for the AP reporter to mention that Khatib was either delusional or lying. Even a cursory review of the subject would reveal that the Palestinians not only routinely engage in Holocaust denial, PA sponsored media is replete with the worst anti-Semitic propaganda. But for the AP, having gotten its quote, its accuracy was irrelevant. What is important is only perceived balance in the story, not actual truth.</p>
<p>But one cannot blame AP alone. Mainstream media vehicles world over went with the AP story without a blink. From <em>Telegraph</em> in the UK to the <em>Washington Post</em> and CBS News, to name just a few, the AP story with PA spokesman Ghassan Khatib’s succeeded in having his lie be the “Lie Heard Around the World.”</p>
<p>Even a basic internet search would have brought up numerous and well-documented examples over the period of more a decade of</p>
<ul>
<li>official Palestinian approval of Hitler and the Nazis</li>
<li>the fact that Palestinian schools and PA-produced textbooks ignore the Holocaust</li>
<li> that Palestinian propaganda – both internal and external – has appropriated the Holocaust narrative of the Jews, removed the Jews, and adapted it as their own.</li>
</ul>
<p>A few examples: On Nov. 29, 2000, PA TV presented Dr. Issam Sissalem, a history lecturer at Islamic University in Gaza, and billed a Palestinian expert on Jews and Judaism, on their educational program “Pages From Our History.” Dr. Sissalem began by declaring: “Lies surfaced about Jews being murdered here and there, and the Holocaust. And of course these are all lies and unfounded claims. There was no Dachau, no Auschwitz! [They] were cleansing sites&#8230; They [the Jews] began to publicize in their propaganda media that they were persecuted, murdered and exterminated&#8230; Committees acted here and there to establish this entity [i.e.: Israel], this foreign entity, implanted as a cancer in our country [Palestine]…, They [the Jews] always portrayed themselves as victims, and they made a Center for Heroism and Holocaust. Whose heroism? What Holocaust? It is our nation” Dr. Sissalem concluded, “which is heroic, the holocaust was against our people&#8230; We were the victims, but we shall not remain victims forever.”</p>
<p>In other words: There was no Holocaust against the Jews, concentration camps did not exist, it was all made up by the Jews to gather international support for the Jews to steal the land of the Palestinian Arabs and then carry out a Holocaust against the Palestinians. Denial, then role reversal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/yedidya-atlas/the-media-and-the-palestinians-big-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Cantor Gets the Mideast Conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yedidya-atlas/eric-cantor-gets-the-mideast-conflict/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=eric-cantor-gets-the-mideast-conflict</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yedidya-atlas/eric-cantor-gets-the-mideast-conflict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yedidya Atlas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afternoon Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palestinian state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yasser Arafat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=117682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The congressman takes heat for insisting that Palestinians show that they're "worthy of a state." ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/110318_eric_cantor_ap_328.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-117689" title="110318_eric_cantor_ap_328" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/110318_eric_cantor_ap_328.gif" alt="" width="375" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>Dr. Ahmed Tibi, MD, an Arab member of the Israeli Knesset and former advisor to PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, recently wrote an op-ed in the Richmond Times-Dispatch attacking US House Majority Leader Eric Cantor for having declared that “If the Palestinians want to live in peace in a state of their own, they must demonstrate that they are worthy of a state.” In and of itself hardly a remarkable position considering the history of organized Palestinian Arab terrorism that has gone on unabated since the founding of the PLO in 1964 and before. Yet Dr. Tibi then infers that Mr. Cantor therefore “holds all Palestinians responsible for the violence of a few.”</p>
<p>This interesting assumption made by Dr. Tibi is that Palestinian Arab violence and support of said violence is the handiwork of a “few,” a small minority. To determine whether this is true, two basic issues have to be clarified. One, whether or not said violence is the result of only “a few” who implicitly carry out their violent work against the wishes of the Palestinian Arab leadership and without popular support from the Palestinian Arab population. And two, what is considered to be moderate and non-violent means in the view of Dr. Tibi.</p>
<p>Let’s first take a glance at Dr. Tibi’s own behavior. As noted above, he served as an advisor to PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, a man he first met in 1984 in Tunis to where Arafat had fled after being ignominiously chased out of Beirut by the Israelis in 1982. Arafat, head of Fatah and subsequently the entire PLO, was responsible for airplane hijackings, indiscriminate murder of civilian targets, including the September 1972 kidnapping and murder of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympic games, the 1973 abduction and murder of Western diplomats in Khartoum, Sudan, &#8211; where Arafat himself personally gave the order to kill US Ambassador Cleo Noel and two other diplomats. And after Arafat signed the 1993 Oslo Accords and supposedly changed his ways, he and the Palestinian Authority pursued a campaign of massive incitement in the official PA media and school textbooks, and supported ongoing terrorist activities, including suicide bombings, and in its first 5 years more Israeli civilians were murdered by Palestinian Arab terror attacks than in the previous 15 years.  To avoid the guilt by association card, let us examine Dr. Tibi’s own “moderate and non-violent” approach.</p>
<p>Dr. Tibi writes in his op-ed: “I, too, reject the Palestinian violence Cantor mentioned that is directed at Israeli civilians, but unlike Cantor I believe in strengthening nonviolent efforts to overcome Israeli domination.” But does he really believe in “strengthening nonviolent efforts”?</p>
<p>According to a report in the Haaretz daily newspaper, on August 16, 2000, during the Jewish Fast Day of Tisha B’Av (9<sup>th</sup> day of the Hebrew month of Av) when Jews mourn the destruction of both the First and Second Jewish Temples in Jerusalem, Dr. Tibi, already a Member of Knesset, led a large Arab crowd chanting, &#8220;with blood and fire we will liberate Palestine,&#8221; while physically blocking an annual police-approved pilgrimage of the Jewish Temple Mount Faithful group to enter the Temple Mount. One wonders what part of “with blood and fire” is “strengthening nonviolent efforts”?</p>
<p>As far as the alluded lack of popular support for violence, a March 2008 report by the Palestinian Center for Policy &amp; Survey Research (PSR) noted that 67% of the Palestinian Arab population supported armed attacks against Israeli civilians inside pre-1967 Israel, and not merely Israeli military targets or “settlers,” with only 31% opposed. So much for Dr. Tibi’s “few.”</p>
<p>Dr. Tibi also takes former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to task because Mr. Gingrich “recently claimed that we Palestinians are an &#8216;invented people.&#8217; And what, pray tell, are the Americans? Gingrich&#8217;s people are every bit as invented, perhaps more, as they come from every corner of the globe.”</p>
<p>The comparison Dr. Tibi wishes to convey is that if the “Palestinians” are an “invented people,” well so are the Americans. And if the Americans are an “invented people” too, then at the very least, the “Palestinians” are no less entitled to a state than are the citizens of the United States of America (AKA “Gingrich’s people&#8221; by Dr. Tibi). Clever, but the comparison doesn’t quite work.</p>
<p>It is true that the United States is a country comprised of a “melting pot” of citizens who arrived from many other countries around the world. Not only do Americans not deny this (as Dr. Tibi and friends do regarding the invented Palestinians), it is considered an issue of accomplishment and pride among Americans. Further, it is a matter of record that since the formal and recognized establishment of the United States of America in 1781 following the end the American Revolutionary War, the overwhelming percentage of the current American population arrived in the 150 or so years after that time. And in line with the Emma Lazarus sonnet engraved on a plaque on the Statue of Liberty that declares: “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” Americans are proud of their humble antecedents. But all these people came to a functioning and internationally recognized country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yedidya-atlas/eric-cantor-gets-the-mideast-conflict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 769/784 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 09:00:33 by W3 Total Cache -->