<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrontPage Magazine &#187; Yoel Meltzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/yoel-meltzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 07:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Et Tu, Sarkozy?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/et-tu-sarkozy-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=et-tu-sarkozy-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/et-tu-sarkozy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoel Meltzer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian Statehood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Nicolas Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=109300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French President embraces the Palestinian lie. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sarkozy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-109305" title="sarkozy" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sarkozy.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="307" /></a></p>
<p>Recently, French president Nicolas Sarkozy came out with some surprisingly harsh statements against Israel while concomitantly expressing strong support for the justness of a Palestinian state.  Moreover, the French leader even claimed &#8220;the Palestinians have been waiting for a state they deserve for 60 years now.&#8221; Since many people in the world unquestionably believe that this claim is based upon historical facts and truths, I have written the following open letter to Sarkozy in order to debunk this historical falsehood.</p>
<p>Dear Mr. Sarkozy,</p>
<p>As part of your recent <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4132036,00.html">outburst</a> against Israel in which you termed Abbas a &#8220;statesman&#8221; for his supposed willingness to come to the negotiating table as opposed to Netanyahu whom you described as being someone that &#8220;never fails to disappoint us,&#8221; you added a most interesting line.  While discussing your support for the creation of a Palestinian state you justified your stand by stating that &#8220;the Palestinians have been waiting for a state they deserve for 60 years now&#8221;.</p>
<p>I hate to burst your bubble but not everyone agrees with that sentence or the implicit accusation that Israel is to blame for not helping the Palestinians attain statehood.  History, in fact, seems to say otherwise.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure you know, following World War 1 and the breakup of the Ottoman Empire the Middle East was divided up by the great powers of the day.   While most of the territory in the region was given to the Arabs for the creation of several new countries, one area, via the Mandate for Palestine, was set aside to be the national home for the Jewish people.  Based upon the recognition of Jewish historical rights in Palestine, the mandate charged the British with facilitating the creation of a Jewish state on both sides of the Jordan River.  However, despite the fact that the mandate was a legally binding document that was conferred at the San Remo Conference and approved by the League of Nations, the British disregarded their responsibility and in an act of duplicity transferred roughly 80% of Palestine to the Arabs for the creation of Transjordan, the forerunner of Jordan.</p>
<p>Moreover, even on the roughly 20% of Palestine that was left for the creation of a Jewish state, the British continued to betray the role that was assigned to them.  Rather than permitting Jews to easily settle in Palestine they actually limited the amount of Jewish immigration, even during the dark years of the Nazis, while simultaneously allowing the influx of large amounts of Arabs from the surrounding countries.  Not surprisingly years of such injustice by the British only increased the tension between Jews and Arabs, so much so that in 1947 an offer was made to partition the country.  The Jews accepted, even though this was only a tiny portion of the original area that had been promised them while the Arabs refused.  In other words Mr. Sarkozy, roughly sixty years ago the Arabs, not yet called the Palestinians as that name only came into vogue two decades later, rejected a state on land that legally had been granted to the Jews!  So do you still believe that the Arabs deserve a state on more or less the same land they rejected sixty years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/et-tu-sarkozy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Islam and Nationalism</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/islam-and-nationalism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=islam-and-nationalism</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/islam-and-nationalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoel Meltzer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=96204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another reason why the Arabs will never be satisfied with a state in Judea and Samaria.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/nat.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-96207" title="nat" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/nat.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="298" /></a></p>
<p>One of the cornerstones of the two-state solution is the belief that the Palestinians, as well as the larger Arab world, will be satisfied with the creation of an Arab state either within the territory of Judea and Samaria alone or when combined with the smaller Gaza Strip.  Either way such a country, as many of the two-state supporters claim, is all that the Arabs really want and therefore the fears that one day the Arabs will try to liberate all of &#8220;Palestine&#8221; are nothing but hot air.</p>
<p>In addition to whitewashing the PLO&#8217;s 1974 Phased Plan for Israel&#8217;s destruction, a plan which many argue is still in existence, as well as just being downright naïve following years of Arab belligerence, the faithful advocates of the two-state narrative are also ignoring another salient point.</p>
<p>As is well known the Palestinians, together with most of the Arab world, are overwhelmingly Muslim.  This is a very key point because it affects the Arab outlook on state nationalism in a way that is very different from the standard Christian or Jewish perspective.  For this reason it is erroneous to arrive at conclusions regarding Arab intentions based upon a non-Muslim mindset.</p>
<p>For instance, although in Judaism there is the concept of &#8220;the nation of Israel&#8221; (am yisrael) connecting all Jews throughout the world in a feeling of mutual allegiance and brotherhood, the existence of this international facet does not negate the distinct national aspect of Judaism, namely the obligation to establish Jewish sovereignty specifically in one area of the world known as the Land of Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/islam-and-nationalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If Israel Changed Direction?</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/what-if-israel-changed-direction-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-if-israel-changed-direction-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/what-if-israel-changed-direction-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 04:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoel Meltzer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=93968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following Obama's speech, the time has come for Israel to finally make a real change.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/r.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-94065" title="r" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/r.gif" alt="" width="375" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>In the early years of Saturday Night Live there was a classic skit called &#8220;What if?&#8221; Posing as pseudo-intellectuals, Jane Curtain and company discussed such nonsensical topics as &#8220;What if Napoleon Bonaparte had B-52 bombers at the Battle of Waterloo?&#8221; or &#8220;What if Superman had landed in Germany instead of America?&#8221;  As silly as those topics were, I have a feeling that in the future people will consider Israel&#8217;s resurrection of Yasser Arafat and the PLO nearly twenty years ago as being far more outlandish.</p>
<p>Kicked out of Jordan in the early 1970s and then out of Lebanon a decade later before finally being exiled to Tunisia, Arafat and his comrades were not only brought back to life by Israel but were even, in an act that defied all levels of pretzel logic, deposited on our own doorstep.  Not surprisingly, such foolish acts of benevolence to someone who was arguably the godfather of international terrorism ended up costing us dearly throughout the past twenty years.  In retrospect one can only wonder &#8220;What if Israel had not acted so imprudently?&#8221;</p>
<p>In order to counterbalance such rash Israeli behavior and perhaps even to point the way for a fresh change of direction, I&#8217;d like to pose here a series of very real &#8220;What ifs?&#8221;.  Moreover, in light of President Obama&#8217;s recent speech and the unrealistic demands he is placing on Israel, the time for a real change has never been more urgent.</p>
<p>* What      if Israel told the      world that following years of repeatedly having its naïve willingness to      divide the land and reconcile with the Arabs always greeted by an Arab      refusal to settle the dispute, Israel finally understands      that its intentions have been misguided and therefore it no longer intends      to continue down the same path?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel      told the world that despite endless attempts at reconciliation with the      Arabs as well as countless &#8220;good-will gestures&#8221;, we’ve had it      with the murderous attacks, threats, boycotts, condemnations and overall      de-legitimization?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel said that the      path it&#8217;s been following for the last twenty years, at the urging of the      international community, has brought no peace to the region and has only      weakened Israel&#8217;s      deterrence and thus jeopardized its security?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel told the      world that the only chance for real peace in the region depends on Israel      making a shift in direction?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel      politely yet firmly told the world &#8220;No, we don&#8217;t accept the two-state      solution&#8221;?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel told the      world that the two-state solution will eventually lead to Israel&#8217;s      destruction, and this being the case we do not intend to commit national      suicide?  Would the world criticize      us for acting logically?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel calmly and      confidently told the world that the Land      of Israel belongs to the Jewish      people and therefore we are declaring full Israeli sovereignty over Judea      and Samaria?</p>
<p>* What      if Israel      stated that the Jewish people, as opposed to its Arab neighbors, have only      one country of their own?  Would the      world argue with this fact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/what-if-israel-changed-direction-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Voice of Reason from an Arab Dissident</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/a-voice-of-reason-from-an-arab-dissident/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-voice-of-reason-from-an-arab-dissident</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/a-voice-of-reason-from-an-arab-dissident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 04:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoel Meltzer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedouin tribes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colonel gaddafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordanian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim brotherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribal elders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=92321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A courageous Palestinian Jordanian openly announces: Jordan is Palestine!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/courage.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-92322" title="courage" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/courage.jpg" alt="" width="378" height="504" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The following is an interview with Mudar Zahran, a Palestinian Jordanian and former political insider who fled Jordan and currently resides in England.  In an open and honest manner, Mudar briefly discusses the current unrest in Jordan, the various players in Jordan and their links to Islamic groups, his vision of a Palestinian state in Jordan as opposed to the two-state solution, his attempts at effecting change and the subsequent threats against him.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Protests in Jordan</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Yoel Meltzer:</strong> Like most Arab countries, protests are also taking place in Jordan.  According to what I&#8217;ve read the king is claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is responsible for the protests.  Is this true?</p>
<p><strong>Mudar Zahran:</strong> Not at all. A story was reported in the Jerusalem Post and it dismissed such a claim.  The organizers of the events are mostly tribal Jordanians calling for less power for the king.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> So the MB is not involved at all?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> The MB represents just a small fraction of the protesters.  Most of those involved are tribal elders or people representing tribal factions and very, very few Palestinians.  What the king is doing is exactly what Colonel Gaddafi is doing.  Just as Gaddafi is claiming that he is fighting Al-Qaeda when he is actually fighting rebels who hate his oppressive rule, so too Abdullah and his media, and lately his prime minister, are all insisting the protesters are MB members.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> But I thought the Bedouin tribes were allies of the king?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> They are.  Yet he has fed them and empowered them to the point where they do not want him any more.  They want a constitutional monarchy as was referred to in a 1920 convention.  In that year King Abdullah&#8217;s grandfather met with tribal leaders of what was then Eastern Palestine and agreed with them to mutually rule the country.  They want that restored so that they become partners in his rule, or nearly rulers themselves.  If not, they shall revolt.  They have been saying that openly.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> Isn&#8217;t Jordan already a constitutional monarchy?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> Jordan claims to be a constitutional monarchy while it is by all means a dictatorship.  A constitutional monarchy is where the king reigns but does not run the country, as is the case in the UK, Sweden, Norway and others.  In Jordan the king has all the authority with zero accountability.</p>
<p>In reality Jordan is a dictatorship headed by a slick-dressing dictator who speaks perfect English, as opposed to Saddam&#8217;s military uniform or Assad&#8217;s bad English.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> Regarding the current protests in Jordan, are they being attended by large crowds or do most people choose to stay away?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> Most Palestinians, who are the majority, are too afraid to get involved.  Even the Washington Institute and the Jerusalem Post have confirmed that most Palestinians are not participating.  While in other Arab countries the protesters are facing their own cousins behind the police guns and clubs, in Jordan the Palestinians would be facing the ruthless Bedouins who have been terrorizing them since 1970.</p>
<p>This is mainly an affair between the king and the tribes.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> In your opinion, will the changes that the tribes are requesting have a positive effect on the Palestinians?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> Just read their statements.  The latest one was signed by 36 of their leaders calling for the expelling of the Palestinians or taking away their passports.  Some even called for repossessing the property of Palestinians and several called for &#8220;re-establishing Israel as an enemy state.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> Are they more anti-Israel than the king?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> You bet.  The king is just a puppet in their hand and that is why he has been taking an anti-Palestinian and an anti-Israeli stance since he came to power.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> So which would you prefer, the king continuing as is or the changes that the tribes want?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> The king cannot continue and the tribes will oust him sooner or later.  His father remained their king only because he fed them so much and gave them unbelievable privileges even according to American standards.  The present king does not have the money to do this and their numbers have exceeded the country&#8217;s resources.  Economically speaking Jordan, which heavily depends on excessive taxation of its Palestinians, will not have the resources to pay any more of the privileges and benefits the tribesmen get in Jordan.  So sooner or later they will oust him, probably sooner more than later.  The result will be hostile uncontrollable tribes in Jordan who are playing with the country in an unruly manner just like their ancestors did for thousands of years.  In the Bedouin culture stealing someone else&#8217;s wealth and land is not a shame, in fact it is a matter of honor&#8230;they call it Ghazou and Khawa.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> Almost sounds like Afghanistan</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> Very much so, only the Bedouins in Jordan are well armed and well trained with fine American weapons.  For some unknown reason Jordan spends 40 percent of its budget on military and building an army.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Links between Bedouin Tribes and Islamic Groups</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> Are the tribes close to the MB or to other groups outside of Jordan such as Al-Qaeda or Hezbollah?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> The MB&#8217;s leadership is mostly tribal. Its senior leaders are Zaki Bani Rushaid, Salim Flahat and Abdul Majid Thubnibat.  Each one of them is a Bedouin and not a Palestinian and each one was present at the last protest which ended up violently.  Zaki Bani Rushaid, who is the strongest leader within the MB, was a former office manager of Khaled Meshaal (the political leader of Hamas).</p>
<p>The southern part of Jordan is closely and heavily connected to Al-Qaeda.  Many tribesmen believe in Salafi methodology and lately they have been parading around the southern city of Maan, a tribal stronghold, waving their own flags and walking around with their fine M-16s.  Yet for some reason none of this has made it to the western media.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> What is &#8220;Salafi methodology&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> Salafi methodology is the orthodox denomination in Islam.  It is the ideology that Osama bin Laden belongs too as did Zarqawi, a Jordanian terrorist who was the chief Al-Qaeda operator in Iraq until shortly before he was killed.  Also connected to Salafi was Hammam al-Balawi, the suicide bomber who killed 7 CIA officers in Afghanistan in the 2009 Khost bombing.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Trying to Establish Peace in the Wrong Geographical Location</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> As you know, later this year the Palestinians intend on declaring a state.  Although personally you believe that Jordan should be this Palestinian state, Abbas is pushing for a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria.  What do you think about this?</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> I believe Jordan is the eastern side of Palestine and that the Jordan River should be a good fence between Israel and Jordan.  What Abbas is going to do is comedy evolving into Saturday Night Live sponsored by the UN.  What state Mr. Abbas?  What state when most Palestinians, including 70 percent of Palestinians in Jerusalem, would rather be under Israeli rule?  Mr. Abbas is repaying those Arab states who finance his authority and who do not want to see the Palestinians and the Israelis enjoying peace.</p>
<p>The question is, are the Israelis that weak?  In any normal country the Itamar massacre would send shock waves of reality.  Have I seen any Israeli politician, even so-called right-wingers like FM Lieberman, speak openly of putting the Palestinians back in their homeland?</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> Your words are very powerful.  The problems in Israel are deep and complex.  Putting them aside for a moment, the current problem is that Abbas going to the UN has serious repercussions.  Whether it&#8217;s approval from the Security Council or from the General Assembly, either way it&#8217;s something that carries a lot of weight. From there it might be relatively easy to call for sanctions against Israel if it fails to comply and remove its citizens and army from the new Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> It seems that Mr. Abbas&#8217;s adventures will lead the region into a massive war.  Although I doubt the US and Israel&#8217;s other friends would approve a UN resolution calling for sanctions against Israel, nonetheless there will be more headaches and more trouble for Israel.  More importantly, I believe all of this is the result of trying to establish peace in the wrong geographical location.  Imagine if the pressure had always been to share historical Palestine where we get two thirds and you get one third &#8211; us across the river and you on the other side.</p>
<p>Abbas&#8217; statehood stunt is reckless and will eventually lead the region into a massive war that might even produce WWIII.</p>
<p>Such a move is also harmful to the Palestinians since it can give Israel every legitimate reason to sever ties for good with the Palestinians.  Israel is the only country that allows them to accept and take jobs and it is their transportation and trade outlet.  Only Abbas will benefit from such a move.  He is following in the footsteps of Hamas who only wanted to rule and didn&#8217;t care if the Palestinians starved.  The same is going to happen with Mr. Abbas.</p>
<p>By the way, his seeking a state is also against the Oslo agreement.  Hence it&#8217;s about time that Israel gets real and revises its agreement.  Israel needs to decide that the Palestinians can establish their own state across the river since any Palestinian statehood between the sea and the river will only lead to more wars and more troubles.</p>
<p>However, keep in mind that all of this is happening because one family, the Hashemites, want to keep controlling Eastern  Palestine.  This is absurd.</p>
<p><strong>YM:</strong> I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s only because of the Hashemites but that certainly is part of it.  Whatever may have been in the past, today most of the world &#8220;buys&#8221; the Palestinian story and Israel is increasingly being slandered as a &#8220;horrible occupier.&#8221;  Just recently was the 7th annual &#8220;Israel Apartheid Week&#8221; in colleges throughout the West.  Can the trend of the world be changed in order to stop, as you said, &#8220;trying to establish peace in the wrong geographical location&#8221;?</p>
<p><em>(Editor&#8217;s note: See <a href="http://walloflies.org/home/">the Freedom Center&#8217;s campaign</a> to counter the lies of &#8220;Israel Apartheid Week&#8221;.)</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Efforts to Change the Entrenched Point of View</span></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>MZ:</strong> True, it is not only because of the Hashemites yet it certainly is partly due to their presence.  Were the Hashemites not ruling the eastern part of Palestine then the Palestinians already would have had a country for sixty years and nobody would have pressured Israel to give away its land.  Yet this is not the case and the Hashemites are ruling the place and constantly telling the Palestinians they are merely refugees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/yoel-meltzer/a-voice-of-reason-from-an-arab-dissident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 483/490 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 06:16:27 by W3 Total Cache -->