"For more than 200 years, our party has led the fight for civil rights, health care, Social Security, workers' rights, and women's rights." I'm starting to wonder if the Democratic Party isn't a party of liars, but a party of people so abysmally ignorant of basic history that they don't even know that they're lying anymore.
I'm starting to wonder if the Democratic Party isn't a party of liars, but a party of people so abysmally ignorant of basic history that they don't even know that they're lying anymore.
For more than 200 years, our party has led the fight for civil rights, health care, Social Security, workers' rights, and women's rights.
That's the claim on the Democrats site under "Our History"
I'm interested to hear about Andrew Jackson's support for health care reform and his civil rights achievements on the Trail of Tears. And I doubt that Andrew Jackson's Petticoat Affair (not what you think) really qualifies as feminism.
The Democrats seem to think that they were fighting for civil rights while supporting slavery. Perhaps they mean this notable support for civil rights from the Democratic Party Platform of 1868.
After the most solemn and unanimous pledge of both Houses of Congress to prosecute the war exclusively for the maintenance of the government and the preservation of the Union under the Constitution, it has repeatedly violated that most sacred pledge, under which alone was rallied that noble volunteer army which carried our flag to victory. Instead of restoring the Union, it has, so far as in its power, dissolved it, and subjected ten States, in time of profound peace, to military despotism and negro supremacy.
That was only 144 years ago.
I could go back to 1840, that's not quite 200 years ago, but it's close enough.
Resolved, That congress has no power, under the constitution, to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several states, and that such states are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their own affairs, not prohibited by the constitution; that all efforts by abolitionists or others, made to induce congress to interfere with questions of slavery, or to take incipient steps in relation thereto, are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences
But at least the Democratic Party always supported the rights of immigrants. Just take a look at their Chicago party platform in 1896.
We hold that the most efficient way of protecting American labor is to prevent the importation of foreign pauper labor to compete with it in the home market, and that the value of the home market to our American farmers and artisans is greatly reduced by a vicious monetary system, which depresses the prices of their products below the cost of production, and thus deprives them of the means of purchasing the products of our home manufacturers, and, as labor creates the wealth of the country, we demand the passage of such laws as may be necessary to protect in all its rights.
200 years, folks. 200 years. And if they control the educational system for another forty, no one will be able to read any of this except the apparatchiks of the party.