It's always great to hear old radicals reminiscing about the time they helped undermine America. It's even better when they have risen to become Secretary of State.
It's always great to hear old radicals reminiscing about the time they helped undermine America. It's even better when they have risen to become Secretary of State. With Kerry, America has its own version of Joschka Fischer. The problem is that America didn't need a Joschka Fischer or a Joschka Kerry.
Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking at the General Assembly of the Organization of American States in Guatemala on Wednesday, reminisced about his first trip to Latin America as a U.S. senator back in 1985:
"I have been traveling, actually, to Latin America for decades now. I think the first trip I made as a United States senator in 1985 was to this region. And that was during a time of great transformation and challenge in places like Nicaragua and El Salvador. And like my Senate colleagues, I was then focused on issues of conflict resolution."
By issues of "conflict resolution", Kerry means he tried to stop President Reagan from aiding the rebels against the Communist regime by falsely claiming that the Sandinistas weren't Communists and were willing to live in peace with us as long as we stopped aiding the Contras.
Kerry did not specifically mention to the OAS gathering that his 1985 trip was to meet with then-president of Nicaragua Daniel Ortega, the head of the Moscow-backed Communist Sandinistas who were fighting a proxy war with the United States via the U.S.-backed "Contra" rebels.
Senator Kerry flew to Nicaragua in April with fellow Democratic Sen. Thomas Harkin of Iowa, met with Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega Saavedra, and brought back word that Mr. Ortega would be willing to accept a cease-fire if Congress rejected aid to the rebels, or ``contras.'' That week the House initially voted down aid to the contras, and Mr. Ortega made an immediate trip to Moscow -- an action that moved House Speaker Thomas P. O'Neill Jr. to say the ill-timed trip embarrassed those who had voted against aid.
After the fall of the USSR and the success of Reagan's policies, Kerry might have the sense to keep his mouth shut instead of mentioning his botched intervention on behalf of a regime that is once again in power in a region where the left is crushing human rights in places like Venezuela and Cuba.
Instead Kerry, as always doubles down. As I wrote in my article this week, Kerry never learns anything from history. Never.
The substance of John Kerry’s speech was that he had learned absolutely nothing from the past and that everyone else should join him in not learning anything from the past.
That's still Kerry's message today.