“Sohail Mohammed knows as much about jihad as I do," Christie says.
The real question that should have been asked of Christie at the RJC is about his association with Hamas Imam Mohammed Qatanani, instead Christie diverted to a defense of why he appointed Sohail Mohammed, the Imam's lawyer, to a Superior Court Judgeship.
Christie was asked about Sharia law. He replies that this all comes from appointing a "Muslim man who immigrated to this country as a child." But Sohail wasn't just any Muslim man.
Sohail Mohammed is a board member of the American Muslim Union, an organization that has interlocking leadership with groups that have fundraised for Hamas and hosted a Hamas speaker. The American Muslim Union is closely interlinked with Qatanani's Islamic Center of Passaic County.
Sohail Mohammed was Qatanani's original lawyer when the government began its case against him.
Despite the fact that Mohammed Qatanani was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, the organization that is behind both Al Qaeda and Hamas, despite his own guilty plea to being a member of Hamas, and despite the fact that even in the United States, he had defended a charity that provided funds to children of suicide bombers (this is done as an incentive to reassure terrorists that if they die their families will be taken care of), Qatanani was not deported.
Christie called Qatanani, "a man of great goodwill" and "a constructive force". Christie attended a Ramadan dinner, in the same place where terrorists had fundraised, and kissed Qatanani on the cheek.
Christie goes into a memorized bio full of cheesy praise of Sohail, without ever mentioning Qatanani, then in a fit of phony outrage, he puffs up at Sohail being asked about "Jihad" at his hearing.
“Sohail Mohammed knows as much about jihad as I do," Christie says. Except considering Christie's past work as a Federal prosecutor, he should know quite a bit about it.
And considering Sohail's work in terror related issues and his ties to a Hamas terrorist, it's no surprise that he would be asked about Jihad.
Then Christie insists that Sohail knows as much about Sharia as he does. That would make Sohail a very bad Muslim or it makes Christie a buffoon who doesn't know what Sharia law even means.
Christie isn't even trying to be honest here. He has left out the most basic pieces of the puzzle. And the quality of his memorized speech strongly suggests to me that this was a planted question which reeks of extreme ugliness because that would mean that he chose to use a Jewish forum as a platform for going into his "Just because he's a Muslim " rant.
It smacks of another planted viral video, except this time pandering to the liberals who have turned on him.