Supporting Iran's nuclear program is moderate
Better watch out for these folks. They're "hard line" opponents of Iran's moderately genocidal nuclear weapons program.
Here's how the New York Times decided to write about United Against Nuclear Iran, a group that holds the fanciful idea that an international sponsor of terrorism probably shouldn't be allowed to have nukes.
The highly unusual move by the Justice Department raises questions about the connections between the American government and the group, United Against Nuclear Iran, a hard-line voice seeking to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The group has a roster of prominent former government officials and a reputation for uncovering information about companies that sometimes do business with Iran, in violation of international sanctions.
We've now reached the topsy-turvy world of liberalism in which supporting Iran's nuclear program is moderate but opposing it is hard-line.
Instead of investigating Iran's nuclear program, the New York Times investigates opponents of nuclear terrorism. (Hard-line opponents, mind you.)
If they were moderate opponents of Iran's moderate nuclear program, they would have no problem with Iran getting a few nukes. Unfortunately they're hard liners so they're completely opposed to Iran's program of nuking Tel Aviv.
This latest bout of insanity has been brought to you by the letter L. L for Liberal, also Lunatic.