A few years ago, I got into an argument with an expert on military operations. I had written a white paper proposing the creation of a national-security court for terrorism cases. In the paper I criticized the trend to “judicialize” warfare, arguing that, in our system, judgments about the detention and treatment of alien enemy […]
Andrew C. McCarthy: Kill or Capture? – National Review Online
Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: agenda, alien enemy, andrew c, Andrew C. McCarthy - National, argument, capture, clarence thomas, contention, Court, creation, detention, due process rights, enemy, enemy combatants, enemy operatives, exception, Expert, hellfire missile, human rights agenda, international humanitarian law, Interrogation, intrusion, jihadist, judicialize, Justice Clarence Thomas, Leftists, military expert, national review online, national security, Paper, point, point of contention, position, second guessing, security court, situation, sound discretion, system, Terrorism, thesis, treatment, trend, valid options, War, warfare, warfighters
Intellectuals and Society
Filed Under: FrontPage Tagged With: auto mechanic, Bois, book, capitalist society, Charles Beard, Chomsky, civil engineer, Cloward, contention, debate, dose, Equality, equality of opportunity, equality of results, evidence, Expert, feedback mechanisms, Frances Fox, frances fox piven, Free, germany, H.G. Wells, incentive structure, income, infamy, insularity, intellectual landscape, intellectuals, issue, ivory tower, John Dewey, Lincoln, literature professor, Michael Eric Dyson, Milton Friedman, moral of the story, movement, opportunity, Piven, professor, Race, race and economics, Russia, series, Socialism, society, tangible goods, Thomas Sowell, three decades, today, united-states, W.E.B. Du, wing





















