<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrontPage Magazine &#187; jeffrey goldberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/tag/jeffrey-goldberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Chickens__t&#8221; Reporter Claims Obama is Pro-Israel</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/chickens__t-reporter-claims-obama-is-pro-israel/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=chickens__t-reporter-claims-obama-is-pro-israel</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/chickens__t-reporter-claims-obama-is-pro-israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack hussein obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=244862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing that Goldberg's latest screed establishes is that he's a dishonest lying hack. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/goldberg-jeffrey.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-244863" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/goldberg-jeffrey.jpg" alt="goldberg jeffrey" width="310" height="305" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/11/08/question-asked-and-answered-23/">Here we go again</a>. (<a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/lauri_regan/">via Lauri Regan</a>)</p>
<p>Jeffrey Goldberg helped embarrass Obama by greedily pimping the &#8220;Chickens__t&#8221; quote thereby not only causing the latest crisis between Obama and the Jewish State, but sabotaging his own effort to harm Netanyahu while helping Obama.</p>
<p>Since then Goldberg has gone back to making the same tiresome arguments that a child can see through. The argument is a false choice. Liberals love it more than they love 50 dollar ethically sourced water. It goes something like this.</p>
<p>&#8220;Either you believe that the current immigration system works or you have to get behind my proposal for illegal alien amnesty. Either you believe that our national security is flawless or you have to back my plan to nuke Denver.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Goldberg variation on it is the same old, same old.</p>
<blockquote><p>My rule of thumb is simple: If you believe that the status quo in the Middle East is sustainable, which is to say, if you believe that Israel can maintain its settlements across the West Bank ad infinitum, and continue, into the indeterminate future, to subvert those Palestinians still working for a two-state solution, then Obama can plausibly be judged &#8212; rhetorically, at least &#8212; as anti-Israel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Goldberg is wrong in two ways.</p>
<p><strong>First</strong> it&#8217;s possible not to hate Israel, but to believe that the situation is unstable. That&#8217;s not the case with Obama who does not like Israel and does not care very much whether the situation is sustainable or not. Though to be fair, no president cared whether it was sustainable.</p>
<p><strong>Second</strong>, and more relevantly, no situation is sustainable &#8220;ad infinitum&#8221;, when it comes to countries.</p>
<p>Is the United States sustainable ad infinitum? History would suggest otherwise. Therefore the United States is unsustainable. So let&#8217;s nuke Denver.</p>
<p>All nations and civilizations are inherently unsustainable. It&#8217;s their imbalances that provide them with momentum and growth. A truly sustainable civilization would be static and dead incapable of growth or change.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s something liberals who love abusing the word sustainable even more than they love Obama, don&#8217;t see to grasp.</p>
<p><strong>Third</strong>, there are no Palestinian Arabs working toward a two-state solution. The last round of negotiations, thoroughly sabotaged by Abbas, proved that.</p>
<p>Aside from everything else, that&#8217;s why Goldberg&#8217;s argument and the various &#8220;Israel needs to stop being selfish and do more for peace&#8221; are nothing more than crazy lies being used to sell a campaign against the Jewish State.</p>
<p>Israel has shown up to countless negotiations, made endless offers, only to get bombed, shot at and have the other side walk away at the last minute because that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s been doing ever since Arafat moved into the place.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The only thing that Jeffrey Goldberg&#8217;s latest screed establishes is that he&#8217;s a dishonest lying hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/chickens__t-reporter-claims-obama-is-pro-israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama vs. Netanyahu: Who&#8217;s the Real Coward?</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ari-lieberman/obama-vs-netanyahu-whos-the-real-coward/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-vs-netanyahu-whos-the-real-coward</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ari-lieberman/obama-vs-netanyahu-whos-the-real-coward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ari Lieberman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chickenshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=244168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two world leaders compared. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Young-Obama-Young-Bibi.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-244169" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Young-Obama-Young-Bibi-381x350.jpg" alt="Young Obama Young Bibi" width="281" height="258" /></a>On May 8, 1972, while &#8220;Barry&#8221; Obama was soaking up the Hawaiian sun, Palestinian terrorists (who else?) hijacked Sabena flight 571 from Vienna to Tel Aviv. A plan was quickly devised to rescue the hostages utilizing Israeli Special Forces of the vaunted Sayeret Matkal. Benjamin Netanyahu and his brother Yoni, both members of Sayeret Matkal, volunteered for the operation and <a href="http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=3842"><span style="color: #0433ff;">fiercely argued</span></a> with each other over which one would participate. The final decision was left to Sayeret Matkal’s commander, Ehud Barak, who chose Bibi.</p>
<p>The commandos boarded the plane dressed as airline technicians and quickly overpowered and neutralized the terrorists while securing the hostages. Bibi was wounded during the assault and while carried off to the tarmac was greeted by his brother who half-jokingly stated, “You see, I told you, you shouldn&#8217;t have gone.” Yoni was tragically killed four years later while leading the successful Entebbe rescue mission.</p>
<p>Obama of course never served in the military and one could even say <a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ari-lieberman/the-obama-doctrine-undermine-the-military-coddle-enemies-and-distance-friends/"><span style="color: #0433ff;">harbors disdain</span></a> for our servicemen and women. While Benjamin Netanyahu was charging terrorists and freeing hostages, Obama was busy smoking marijuana and attending prep school. The contrast between these two leaders, one fearless and self-sacrificing, the other perpetually narcissistic and self-absorbed, could not be greater.</p>
<p>Obama’s minions, however, see it differently. The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg in a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/10/the-crisis-in-us-israel-relations-is-officially-here/382031/"><span style="color: #0433ff;">recent column</span></a> revealed the deep level of animus the administration holds for Netanyahu with senior White House aides disparaging the prime minister with boorishly offensive pejoratives. One profanity in particular – “chickensh*t” – attributed to a senior official, has <a href="http://twitchy.com/2014/10/28/whos-chickensht-again-after-bibi-smear-wh-spanked-with-cold-truth-photos/"><span style="color: #0433ff;">caused a storm</span></a> and stands out as rather ironic considering Obama’s lack of military service and <a href="http://observer.com/2014/08/barack-obamas-toothless-and-feckless-foreign-policy/"><span style="color: #0433ff;">pusillanimous foreign policies</span></a>.</p>
<p>Goldberg’s analysis of Israel’s policies with respect to both Iran and the so-called settlements is fundamentally flawed on several levels but the salient point of the article concerning Obama’s visceral dislike for Netanyahu remains accurate. What is perhaps even more disturbing than the current state of affairs between the two leaders is that Obama wishes to air the dirty laundry, which in turn emboldens Israel’s enemies like the Islamic Republic of Iran and encourages Palestinian intransigence. There is no question that the official, who courageously hid behind the veil of anonymity, knew that Goldberg would write about rupture and disclose the abusive and undiplomatic terminology employed.</p>
<p>Goldberg, accurately described by Ben Shapiro as a man whose nose is permanently embedded in Obama’s colon, places most of the blame for spiraling relations squarely on Netanyahu. While acknowledging that the creation of a Palestinian state at present would be dangerous, Goldberg nevertheless chides Netanyahu for initiating construction beyond the Green Line and continues with the tired line that such initiatives undermine the prospects for a so-called “two-state solution.”</p>
<p>Omitted in Goldberg’s analysis, however, is the fact that it was Netanyahu who in 2009 declared an unprecedented unilateral 10-month settlement freeze in the hope of spurring on the anemic “peace process.” Also omitted is the fact that in 2013 at Obama’s urging, Netanyahu phoned the Islamist anti-Semite Recep Tayyip Erdogan to apologize for the deaths of IHH terrorists during the Mavi Marmara incident. Both of these goodwill gestures, extremely unpopular among Netanyahu’s political base, backfired.</p>
<p>In the case of the former, instead of embracing Netanyahu’s bold peace initiative, Mahmoud Abbas, <a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/the-palestinian-endgame-exposed/"><span style="color: #0433ff;">dragged his heels</span></a> for nine months before responding, ensuring that there would be virtually no time for substantive progress. In the case of the latter, Netanyahu’s apology was reciprocated with an <a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ari-lieberman/time-to-part-ways-with-erdogan/"><span style="color: #0433ff;">avalanche of anti-Semitic vitriol</span></a>.</p>
<p>On Iran, Obama has caused the unravelling of an effective sanctions regimen, all while formulating a plan that virtually ensures and legitimizes Iranian enrichment initiatives, despite that regime’s penchant for lying through its teeth. Obama knows that his plan won’t sit well with Congress and is therefore formulating ways to sidestep the legislative branch. That maneuver not only demonstrates contempt for U.S. allies, but, more troubling, contempt for the United States Constitution.</p>
<p>If Obama, by employing profanity toward Israel’s prime minister, was attempting to influence Israeli political discourse, he is in for a rude awakening. Israelis cherish their 66-year, mutually beneficial relationship with the United States, which is based on shared moral values and strategic interests. But as has been demonstrated countless times, Israelis are no pushovers and don’t take kindly to threats. Menachem Begin’s popularity soared when he faced off against Jimmy Carter and the same thing will likely happen in this unfortunate and needless confrontation.</p>
<p>As for the anonymous senior official, my experience has taught me that there is no greater coward than the anonymous complainer.  He will whine and moan behind the veil of anonymity but in this instance has brought yet more shame and disgrace upon a quickly unraveling administration unable to cope with its own disastrous shortcomings and failures.</p>
<p><b>Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: </b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&amp;field-keywords=david+horowitz&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&amp;qid=1316459840&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;sort=daterank" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a><b>. </b></p>
<p><a style="line-height: 1.5em;" href="http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&amp;id=c761755bdf" target="_blank"><b>Subscribe</b></a><strong style="line-height: 1.5em;"> to Frontpage&#8217;s TV show, <i>The Glazov Gang</i>, and </strong><a style="line-height: 1.5em;" href="https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang" target="_blank"><b>LIKE</b></a><strong style="line-height: 1.5em;"> it on </strong><a style="line-height: 1.5em;" href="https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang" target="_blank"><b>Facebook.</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ari-lieberman/obama-vs-netanyahu-whos-the-real-coward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S.-Israel Relationship in Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/joseph-klein/u-s-israel-relationship-in-crisis-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=u-s-israel-relationship-in-crisis-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/joseph-klein/u-s-israel-relationship-in-crisis-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Klein]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chickenshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palestinians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=244128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sickness behind Washington's verbal assault on Netanyahu.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ShowImage.ashx_.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-244114" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ShowImage.ashx_-434x350.jpg" alt="ShowImage.ashx" width="301" height="243" /></a>The Obama administration’s contemptible hostility towards Israel has descended into the proverbial cellar.  According to an October 28<sup>th</sup> article appearing in <i>The Atlantic</i> by Jeffrey Goldberg, a high-level Obama administration official has recently added &#8220;chickensh*t&#8221; to other derisive terms used in ad hominem verbal attacks on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, such as “recalcitrant, myopic, reactionary, obtuse, blustering, pompous, and ‘Aspergery.’”</p>
<p>Prime Minister Netanyahu responded to the latest diatribe in his remarks to the Knesset on October 29<sup>th</sup> that &#8220;I am being attacked because I am willing to defend the State of Israel.&#8221;</p>
<p>Needless to say, other Israelis were more direct in expressing their outrage at the reported epithet. For example, Economy Minister Naftali Bennett said that “severe curse words against the Israeli prime minister are harmful to millions of Israeli citizens and Jews worldwide.&#8221; Former Israeli United Nations Ambassador Dan Gillerman described such name calling as “shameful,” “abusive,” and “counter-productive.”</p>
<p>The White House has tried to do some damage control regarding the &#8220;chickensh*t&#8221; remark, as it usually does after stepping into its own mess. U.S. National Security Spokesperson Alistair Baskey said in response to the latest imbroglio that “such comments are inappropriate and counter-productive. We do not believe there is a crisis in the relationship. The relationship remains as strong as ever and the ties between our nations are unshakable.&#8221;</p>
<p>With all due respect, Mr. Baskey, the relationship between Israel and the United States is at a historic low. The White House’s petty vindictiveness was illustrated again just last week when Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon was given a cold shoulder by various high-profile Obama administration officials, who were instructed not to meet with the defense minister during his visit to Washington. These officials included Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Advisor Susan Rice.  Aside from a routine meeting with his counterpart Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Defense Minister Ya’alon did manage to meet with the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, despite attempts by the administration, which came too late, to block the meeting. In any event, Ambassador Power focused her attention during the meeting on the settlements issue.</p>
<p>As Jeffrey Goldberg wrote in his article in <i>The</i> <i>Atlantic</i>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The relationship between these two administrations &#8212; dual guarantors of the putatively &#8220;unbreakable&#8221; bond between the U.S. and Israel &#8212; is now the worst it&#8217;s ever been, and it stands to get significantly worse after the November midterm elections. By next year, the Obama administration may actually withdraw diplomatic cover for Israel at the United Nations, but even before that, both sides are expecting a showdown over Iran, should an agreement be reached about the future of its nuclear program.</p></blockquote>
<p>While Jeffrey Goldberg correctly identified the problem, he mistakenly blamed Prime Minister Netanyahu as the main cause of the problem. Goldberg parroted the Obama administration line that, if it were not for the Israeli government’s settlements policies, a peaceful two-state solution would be achievable. He referred to what one Obama administration official described as the administration’s “red-hot anger” at the Israeli prime minister “for pursuing settlement policies on the West Bank, and building policies in Jerusalem, that they believe have fatally undermined Secretary of State John Kerry’s peace process.”</p>
<p>Indeed, Secretary of State John Kerry has gone public in blaming the Jewish state and its settlements policies for the failure of his feckless pretentions to be a peacemaker between the Israelis and the Palestinians.  He even went so far as to repeat without any rebuttal, at a White House reception earlier this month held in honor of a Muslim holiday, a contention that Israel’s intransigence was contributing to the rise of jihad in the Middle East.</p>
<p>The crisis in the once close relationship between the two countries originates from the very top of the Obama administration. President Obama himself has set the tone for the unprecedented verbal assaults from members of his administration on the leader of the only real democracy in the Middle East, and one of the United States’ closest allies – until now.</p>
<p>Back in November 2011, for example, Obama and former French President Nicolas Sarkozy were caught on an open microphone complaining about the Israeli prime minister. After Sarkozy said that he “can’t stand” Prime Minister Netanyahu and called him a “liar,” Obama replied: &#8220;You&#8217;re tired of him; what about me? I have to deal with him every day.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 2010, Obama is reported to have snubbed Prime Minister Netanyahu, declining to join the Israeli leader and his delegation for a White House dinner.</p>
<p>Obama came into office in 2008 with a decidedly pro-Palestinian bias. He absorbed the anti-Semitic rhetoric of his long-time pastor in Chicago, Jeremiah Wright, and of his friend from his teaching days at the University of Chicago, Rashid Khalidi.</p>
<p>Khalidi was a big fan of Yasser Arafat’s terrorist organization, the PLO.  He described Israel as a “racist” state and “basically an apartheid system in creation.” In 2003, at a farewell dinner for Khalidi, who was about to leave the University of Chicago for a position at Columbia University, Obama hailed Khalidi’s insights as an influence on his own thinking. Khalidi later returned the favor, telling pro-Palestinian audiences that Obama deserved their help in winning a U.S. Senate seat, stating: “You will not have a better senator under any circumstances.”</p>
<p>From the beginning of his first presidential term, President Obama signaled his intention to come down hard on Israel by initially demanding a complete freeze on settlements – including on any growth in existing settlements. He also outlined his concept of a final peace agreement that would require Israel to withdraw virtually entirely to the pre-June 1967 lines, but with no reciprocal requirement that the Palestinians renounce completely once and for all its assertion of a so-called “right of return” of millions of &#8220;refugees&#8221; to lands within pre-June 1967 Israel.  He has clearly bought into the self-serving narrative of Palestinian victimhood.</p>
<p>All that the Obama administration wants to talk about are Jewish settlements, failing even to distinguish between actual settlements in the West Bank and expansion of housing for Israelis living in certain Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem that happen to fall within the revisionist construct of a divided “East Jerusalem” that the Obama administration helps to perpetuate. Historically, Jerusalem has been an undivided city that has had a Jewish majority population and has in the past been the capital for the Jewish people. Jordan’s illegal occupation between 1948 and 1967 resulted in the artificial division of Jerusalem that the Palestinians, with help from the Obama administration, seek to make permanent. Jerusalem is whole again as it should be, but – unlike during the years of Jordan’s occupation – the holy sites are open to worshipers of all faiths.</p>
<p>During an “emergency” United Nations Security Council meeting convened on October 29<sup>th</sup> to discuss Israeli plans to build more Jewish housing in “East” Jerusalem, the U.S. representative speaking to the Council called Israel’s “unilateral” actions, including in Jerusalem, “deeply concerning” and provocative. This followed the usual Israeli-bashing by the United Nations bureaucracy. United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Jeffrey Feltman, said during the meeting that &#8220;Israel&#8217;s construction plans in East Jerusalem &#8211; if they go ahead &#8211; raise grave doubts on its willingness to promote peace.&#8221;</p>
<p>Israel wants peace, but not how the Palestinians, backed by the Obama administration and the Palestinians&#8217; allies at the United Nations, would define it.</p>
<p>Gaza was a test case of the Palestinians’ ability and willingness to establish a model for an independent state after Israel withdrew completely in 2005 and turned over economic resources and responsibility for security to the Palestinian Authority. As has happened so often when the Palestinians had a chance for a truly peaceful two-state solution, they blew the opportunity. Hamas, whose genocidal charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews worldwide, took over Gaza in 2007 and turned it into a launching pad for above-ground rocket and underground tunnel attacks against Israeli civilians living in Israeli towns and cities. In Jerusalem itself, just last week, a Hamas affiliated jihadist deliberately drove his car into a group of pedestrians, killing a 3-month old baby, who, it turns out, was an American citizen. The response from Palestinian President Abbas’s Fatah party was to call the baby murderer a “heroic martyr.” A Hamas spokesman called the murder a “natural response” to the “invasion of our land by the Jews.”</p>
<p>Abbas did not express outrage or remorse over the senseless murder of the baby. Indeed, his own incendiary remarks calling for the use of “any means” to stop Jews from visiting or worshipping at the Temple Mount may have helped incite this violent attack. Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent member of the PLO Executive Committee, added her own fuel to the fire by saying that allowing Jews to visit the Temple Mount (which is holy to Jews as well as to Muslims) is a “declaration of war against Islam.” President Obama himself did not speak out publicly regarding such inflammatory rhetoric, the subsequent murderous attack itself or the disgusting reaction of the Palestinian leadership to the attack.</p>
<p>Abbas and the Hamas leadership play “good cop-bad cop” in terms of tactics, but their end-game is the same – the extinguishment of Jewish self-determination in any lands the Palestinians falsely consider their birth-right. There is no room for any Jewish state anywhere between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, in their own vision of the region.</p>
<p>The Obama administration turns a blind eye to the Palestinian pathology of hatred of Jews, some of which is rooted in Islamic supremacism. Preached in mosques and taught in Palestinian schools to poison the minds of generations of Palestinians, such hatred prevents the realization of any true two-state solution which recognizes the right of self-determination of the Jewish people as well as the Palestinian people to live side by side in peace and security.</p>
<p><b>Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: </b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&amp;field-keywords=david+horowitz&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&amp;qid=1316459840&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;sort=daterank" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a><b>. </b></p>
<p><a style="line-height: 1.5em;" href="http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&amp;id=c761755bdf" target="_blank"><b>Subscribe</b></a><strong style="line-height: 1.5em;"> to Frontpage&#8217;s TV show, <i>The Glazov Gang</i>, and </strong><a style="line-height: 1.5em;" href="https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang" target="_blank"><b>LIKE</b></a><strong style="line-height: 1.5em;"> it on </strong><a style="line-height: 1.5em;" href="https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang" target="_blank"><b>Facebook.</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/joseph-klein/u-s-israel-relationship-in-crisis-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israeli Minister: Obama is Throwing Israel Under the Bus</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/israeli-minister-obama-is-throwing-israel-under-the-bus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=israeli-minister-obama-is-throwing-israel-under-the-bus</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/israeli-minister-obama-is-throwing-israel-under-the-bus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=244076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Israel is stronger than all those who curse it.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/obama-and-netanyahu.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-238617" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/obama-and-netanyahu.jpg" alt="obama and netanyahu" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The Israeli government had a variety of responses to<a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/anonymous-obama-official-calls-netanyahu-a-coward/"> Jeffrey Goldberg&#8217;s slimy Atlantic article </a>which quoted anonymous Obama officials calling Netanyahu a &#8220;coward&#8221; and &#8220;chickens__t&#8221;.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/pms-office-responds-to-obama-administrations-vulgar-remarks/2014/10/29/">simplest statement came from</a> Netanyahu&#8217;s office.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Netanyahu will continue to uphold the security interests of the citizens of Israel and the historical rights of the Jewish people in Jerusalem. No pressure will change that.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Naftali Bennett, the Minister of the Economy, and the leader of the conservative party in the coalition, <a href="http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/186733#.VFEBy_lbV8E">had a more vocal response</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>“The United States administration is planning to throw Israel under the bus,” Jewish Home chairman Naftali Bennett said on Tuesday night, responding to harsh words against Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu which were attributed to senior officials in the Obama administration.</p>
<p>“Israel is stronger than all those who curse it,” said Bennett, after Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic quoted officials in Washington as having described Netanyahu as “chickens**t”, among other things.</p>
<p>“Neither the leader of Syria, who has slaughtered 150,000 of his citizens, nor the leader of Saudi Arabia, who stones women and gays, have been called ‘chickens**t. If what is written is true, then the current administration intends to throw Israel under the wheels of the bus,” he said.</p>
<p>“Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, and it has struggled for its existence over the past 66 years. Israel is the vanguard of the free world against the Islamic terrorism of ISIS, Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran,” noted Bennett.</p>
<p>“Instead of attacking Israel and forcing suicide conditions upon it, it should be strengthened.  I call upon the U.S. administration to renounce these abusive remarks and reject them outright,” he concluded.</p></blockquote>
<p>The odds of that happening would seem to be low. But the whole thing does remind me o<a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/jeffrey-goldberg-claims-calling-him-a-sewer-pipe-is-anti-semitic/">f what I wrote about Goldberg in the past</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>I think most people like sewer pipes. The problem is broken sewer pipes. A working sewer pipe carries waste away. A broken sewer pipe carries it to.</p>
<p>A civilization depends on working sewer pipes. But when the media goes into “sewer pipe revolutionist” mode and begins   carrying its own waste into civilization, instead of away from it, then civilization is endangered and needs to replace the broken sewer pipelines with sewer pipes that carry away waste, instead of manufacturing it and spreading it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Goldberg is a broken sewer pipe. So is his boss, Barry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/israeli-minister-obama-is-throwing-israel-under-the-bus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous Obama Official Anonymously Calls Netanyahu a &#8220;Coward&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/anonymous-obama-official-calls-netanyahu-a-coward/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=anonymous-obama-official-calls-netanyahu-a-coward</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/anonymous-obama-official-calls-netanyahu-a-coward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack hussein obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=243985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing says courage like anonymously slandering someone]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/23syo95.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-243986" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/23syo95.jpg" alt="23syo95" width="400" height="325" /></a></p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s people certainly are good at inverting the basic meaning of words. Letting your country get nuked is courageous. Fighting to stop it is cowardly.</p>
<p>Of course this description comes from Atlantic/Bloomberg troll Jeffrey Goldberg who has been known to twist the content high profile interviews as flexibly as possible. We already saw that after Castro had to come out and correct his spin on the interview.</p>
<p>But Obama Inc. is filled with leftists who have little foreign policy experience and hate Israel. And Jeffrey Goldberg is happy to be their useful idiot. Obama Inc. loses its mind when criticized by some Israeli politician, but in true cowardly fashion, doles out attacks on Israeli politicians to malicious trolls like Jeffrey Goldberg.</p>
<p>So he&#8217;s happy enough to turn out an article full of anonymous quotes calling Netanyahu &#8220;Recalcitrant, myopic, reactionary, obtuse, blustering, pompous, and “Aspergery” and &#8220;chickenshit&#8221;.</p>
<p>Oh and a coward.</p>
<p>Because nothing says courage like anonymously slandering someone to a coward who trolls using articles full of supposed quotes from anonymous sources.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a cursed circle of cowardice.</p>
<p>When he isn&#8217;t quoting supposed anonymous officials, Goldberg puts forward his own miserably cowardly point of view by arguing, &#8220;It is true that Jews have a moral right to live anywhere they want in Jerusalem, their holiest city. It is also true that a mature government understands that not all rights have to be exercised simultaneously.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure. Swap in blacks for Jews and Jerusalem for Alabama and see how that works. No?</p>
<p>But this entire cowardly diatribe wouldn&#8217;t do without one coward who is always willing to put his name on the record for whatever view he thinks is popular at the moment.</p>
<blockquote><p>“The Israelis do not show sufficient appreciation for America’s role in backing Israel, economically, militarily and politically,” Abraham Foxman, the head of the Anti-Defamation League, told me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who are the Americans and who are the Israelis?</p>
<p>America polls better in Israel than anywhere else. And vice versa. Is Obama, America? Is Netanyahu, Israel? About as much as Abe Foxman and his useless parasitic organization represents Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/anonymous-obama-official-calls-netanyahu-a-coward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surviving Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/surviving-obama/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=surviving-obama</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/surviving-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 05:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline Glick]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Mailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boycott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president abandons his facade of supporting Israel. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/gty_obama_netanyahu_press_conference_ll_130320_wg.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-220538" alt="gty_obama_netanyahu_press_conference_ll_130320_wg" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/gty_obama_netanyahu_press_conference_ll_130320_wg-450x320.jpg" width="270" height="192" /></a>Originally published by the <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Column-one-Surviving-Obama-344621">Jerusalem Post</a>. </em></p>
<p>Bloomberg columnist Jeffrey Goldberg minced few words in discussing the interview that US President Barack Obama gave him on the eve of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s latest visit to Washington.</p>
<p>Speaking with journalist Charlie Rose, Goldberg equated Obama’s threat to stop supporting Israel in international forums to the talk of a mafia don. Obama told Goldberg that if Israel doesn’t cut a deal with the Palestinians soon, “our ability to manage the international fallout is going to be limited.” He added, “And that has consequences.”</p>
<p>That statement, Goldberg noted, was a “veiled threat” and “almost up there with, ‘Nice little Jewish state you’ve got there. Hate to see something happen to it.’” Goldberg saw the interview as Obama’s way of showing that he is beginning to abandon the pretense of supporting Israel, now that he no longer faces reelection. In Goldberg’s words, “It’s not that the gloves are coming off. It’s more that the mask of diplomatic language is coming off a little bit.”</p>
<p>Goldberg added that due to the fact that Obama “doesn’t have to run again for anything,” he doesn’t need to pretend feelings for Israel that he doesn’t have, by among other things, going to the AIPAC annual policy conference.</p>
<p>And indeed, Obama has achieved a comfort level with implementing anti-Israel policies. His threat to step aside and let Israel-haters have their way in places like the United Nations or in certain quarters of Europe is of a piece with several steps the he is already reportedly undertaking to harm Israel in various ways.</p>
<p>Before he was reelected in 2012, Obama felt it necessary to align his policies on Iran to the preferences of the US public. And as a consequence, although he voiced harsh criticism of congressional sanctions bills against Iran, he grudgingly signed them into law. (He then proceeded to use the sanctions he opposed but signed as proof that he supported Israel in speeches before Jewish audiences.) Now that he no longer has to concern himself with the wishes of the American public and its representatives in Congress, Obama has dropped the mask of opposition to Iran and forged ahead with a diplomatic process that all but ensures Iran will acquire nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>The same is apparently the case with joint US-Israeli missile defense programs. On Wednesday, it was reported that the administration has slashed funding of those programs by two-thirds for the 2015 fiscal year. Obama touted his previous willingness to fully fund those programs – manifested in his decision not to veto congressional appropriations, despite his stated desire to slash funding – as proof of his administration’s “unprecedented” security cooperation with Israel.</p>
<p>Then there are the low-level bureaucratic sanctions that Obama began enacting against Israel last year. These involve State Department activities that are not subject to easy congressional oversight.</p>
<p>For instance, last week it was reported that last year the State Department drastically decreased the number of Israeli tourist visa applications it approved. The rise in rejection rates has prevented Israel from participating in the visa waiver program.</p>
<p>Foreign Ministry officials told reporters they believe this is a deliberate, premeditated policy.</p>
<p>And this week we learned that last year the State Department rejected hundreds of visa requests from members of Israel’s security services.</p>
<p>Although White House spokesman Jay Carney was quick to claim that Israel’s interception of the Iranian missile ship en route to Gaza on Wednesday morning was the result of US-Israeli intelligence cooperation, the fact is that the US continues to undermine Israel’s covert operations in Iran. Earlier this week, CBS reported that the Obama administration has demanded that Israel stop its reported covert campaign to kill Iranian nuclear scientists in order to delay or block Iran’s nuclear progress.</p>
<p>Obama’s new willingness to threaten Israel and to take the actions he feels it is safe to take to downgrade Israel’s relations with the US will likely only grow after November’s midterm elections.</p>
<p>After the congressional elections, Obama will feel entirely free to attack the US’s closest ally in the Middle East.</p>
<p>So what can Israel do? How can Israel safeguard its interests at a time when the US president publicly trashes and threatens those interests and privately undermines them? Israel already did the most important thing in this regard when voters reelected Netanyahu to lead the government last year. During his trip to the US this week, Netanyahu made clear that he understands the challenge and is competent to handle it.</p>
<p>Since Netanyahu returned to the premiership in January 2009, he has implemented a policy of waiting Obama out. Over the past five years, the prime minister has only directly challenged Obama when he had no choice. And that has been the right course. Little good comes to Israel from open fights with the White House. Such fights should only be engaged when the consequences of having a fight are less bad than the consequences of not fighting.</p>
<p>In his speech at the AIPAC Conference on Tuesday, Netanyahu rebutted every position Obama has staked out on the Palestinians and Iran without ever mentioning Obama’s name. By doing so he energized Israel’s supporters while denying Obama the ability to claim that Netanyahu is unsupportive of his policies.</p>
<p>In other words, he humored the White House while staking out an independent Israeli policy for which he secured the support of Israel’s American backers.</p>
<p>But Netanyahu’s skill in maneuvering around Obama is not enough for Israel to safely weather his presidency. Israel needs an overall strategy for securing its interests.</p>
<p>Such a multi-pronged strategy begins with Iran.</p>
<p>Israel needs to directly attack Iran’s nuclear installations – by covert action as well as through overt military strikes, as required.</p>
<p>According to CBS, after Obama’s diplomatic capitulation to Iran became public, Netanyahu ordered Israel’s intelligence services to concentrate their efforts in Iran on exposing the fraudulence of Iran’s purported commitment to freezing its nuclear progress. But while this is important, exposing Iran’s duplicity is not nearly as important as incapacitating Iran’s nuclear sites.</p>
<p>With Obama now joining Secretary of State John Kerry in openly threatening to passively support a European trade war against Israel, it is imperative that Israel develop every economic opportunity it has to expand its markets. As Netanyahu made clear in his speech to AIPAC, Israel’s technological prowess has already made it a magnet for global investors. But these opportunities should be maximized through further economic liberalization.</p>
<p>In a conversation with Haaretz earlier this week, Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz noted that “President Obama has been the president most hostile to the nation of Israel in modern times.”</p>
<p>In a conversation with this writer on Tuesday, Cruz placed the blame for Obama’s success in implementing his anti-Israel policies on the Senate Democrats, led by Majority LeaderHenry Reid.</p>
<p>In his words, “The challenge we are facing is that the number one protector of Obama’s foreign policy has been Harry Reidand the Senate Democrats.”</p>
<p>On the sidelines of the AIPAC conference, Cruz blasted the hypocrisy of Senate Democrats. “At the same time they block the Kirk-Menendez sanctions [bill against Iran] and blame Israel for the impasse in peace negotiations, they proclaim their support for Israel,” he said.</p>
<p>And Cruz is certainly correct.</p>
<p>There can be no doubt that Israel’s strongest supporters today are in the Republican Party.</p>
<p>But it is important to remember that most Democrats also support Israel. They are simply unable politically to withstand the pressures that Obama has brought to bear to force them to stand with him against Israel.</p>
<p>In his speech to AIPAC, Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee confessed that he was forced to stand down on Iran sanctions due to partisan pressure.</p>
<p>In his words, “When it comes to Iran, I have stood with you and have stood against so many in my own party.”</p>
<p>Menendez’s admission that he couldn’t withstand the pressures that Obama and Reid brought to bear against him indicates that among some Democrats, support for Israel remains strong, but that under Obama, Israel’s Democrat supporters are weak.</p>
<p>While deeply problematic, this is a problem with a limited shelf-life.</p>
<p>If Obama views the midterm elections as the final restraint on his ability to act against the will of the American public, his fellow Democrats likely view the elections as the last time Obama will serve as the head of their party during an election cycle. In the 2016 elections, the Democrat presidential nominee will set the tone for the party, not Obama. Moreover, as the full economic impacts of Obamacare, Obama’s signature domestic policy, become known after the midterm elections, Obama will be even more severely weakened. Consequently, his ability to pressure his Democrat colleagues to toe his line will be diminished.</p>
<p>Finally, given Obama’s obsessive focus on demanding that Israel surrender its land to the Palestinians, it is imperative that Israel develop a strategy for waiting Obama out on this issue.</p>
<p>Obama told Goldberg that Israel must surrender to the Palestinians forthwith, because it has no other option. In his words, “I have not yet heard… a persuasive vision of how Israel survives as a democracy and a Jewish state at peace with its neighbors in the absence of a peace deal with the Palestinians and a two-state solution.</p>
<p>As I explain in my book The Israeli Solution: A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East, which was released on Tuesday, Israel has a viable alternative.</p>
<p>It involves applying Israeli law to all of Judea and Samaria and integrating the Palestinians into Israeli society.</p>
<p>Israel would not be endangered demographically or democratically if it adopted this approach, and it would certainly be better off militarily.</p>
<p>Netanyahu has stated his support for establishing a Palestinian state. But he has made clear that he will only agree to a peace deal that protects Israel’s vital interests. While maintaining faith with that position, it would be prudent for him to discuss publicly and at length the fact while a negotiated peace is his preference, there is a fine alternative to a Palestinian terror state in Israel’s strategic and historic heartland.</p>
<p>If the Palestinians are uninterested in negotiating a viable agreement with Israel, then Israel will feel free to adopt an alternative course of applying its laws to Judea and Samaria.</p>
<p>At a minimum, such a move by Netanyahu would discredit and end Obama’s demographic threats, which are based on falsified Palestinian census data. It would place pressure on the Palestinians to show their hand – either embracing peace in a genuine manner, or demonstrating the basic falsity of their protestations of peaceful intentions. Either way, Israel would be better off.</p>
<p>Obama’s newfound courage to begin abandoning his pretense of supporting Israel presents Israel with a new challenge. But it is far from insurmountable. With the proper mix of policies, Israel can absorb Obama’s blows and even to blunt them, as Obama becomes an independent, unrestrained, and weak lame duck president.</p>
<p><b>Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: </b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&amp;field-keywords=david+horowitz&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&amp;qid=1316459840&amp;rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&amp;sort=daterank" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a><b>. </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/surviving-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The True Face of J Street</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/moshe-phillips/the-true-face-of-j-street-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-true-face-of-j-street-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/moshe-phillips/the-true-face-of-j-street-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moshe Phillips]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americans for a safe israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Waskow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former members of congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I. L. Kenen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel and the middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Ben-Ami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jta news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths and facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia chapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabbi Brian Walt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabbi Everett Gendler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabbi Gerald Serotta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shalom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Masters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tzedek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=53729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it really "pro-Israel" to call out for talks with Hamas?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/heschelgreen.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-53732" title="heschelgreen" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/heschelgreen.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="329" /></a></p>
<p>J Street, the controversial pressure group, explains on the &#8220;About Us&#8221; page on its official website that &#8220;J Street is the political arm of the pro-Israel, pro-peace movement.” Since its inception in 2008, J Street has undergone growth that must be considered no less than remarkable.</p>
<p>In large part, the success of J Street has occurred without any serious investigations into how this group grew so incredibly fast and just where it came from.</p>
<p>Jeffrey  Goldberg, writing for <em>The Atlantic </em>on October 27, 2009, stated “J Street grew organically, and continues to grow organically.” Goldberg’s essay was published during J Street’s first conference. The conference was held near Capitol Hill and 1,500 delegates attended. An October 29m, JTA news service report stated “activists had meetings in 210 of the 535 lawmakers&#8217; offices on the Hill, including about 100 meetings with the lawmakers themselves…”</p>
<p>Organic? How could such a new group create such a powerful infrastructure and nurture such impressive contacts so quickly? There should be no doubt that J Street came from somewhere. The question is from where?</p>
<p>The  statement on the &#8220;<a href="http://www.jstreet.org/about/about-us">About Us</a>&#8221; page goes on to state:</p>
<blockquote><p>“J Street was founded to change the dynamics of American politics and policy on Israel and the Middle East. We believe the security and future of Israel as the democratic home of the Jewish people depend on rapidly achieving a two-state solution and regional comprehensive peace. Our mission is to promote meaningful American leadership to achieve peace and security in the Middle East and to broaden the debate on these issues nationally and in the Jewish community.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>On J Street  website’s “Myths and Facts about J Street” page, J Street declares:</p>
<blockquote><p>“J Street&#8217;s Advisory Council consists of over 170 prominent Americans &#8211; including three Former Members of Congress, 28 Rabbis, a number of former Jewish community leaders and professionals, and many others.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Researchers with the Philadelphia Chapter of Americans For A Safe Israel/AFSI initiated a study of the rabbis connected to J Street in order to understand just what the backgrounds of “former Jewish community leaders” involved in J Street are. What light can be shed on J Street’s agenda by examining its structure and organization?</p>
<p>Being Philadelphia based, AFSI researchers had prior familiarity with many of these players. A large number of J Street rabbis have played senior leadership roles in the Pennsylvania based Reconstructionist Rabbinical College and the locally headquartered network of Jewish Renewal organizations. A cadre of these individuals were also leaders of the now defunct Philadelphia chapter of New Jewish Agenda, which was specifically noted for its radical stance &#8212; even in that radical group.</p>
<p>The results  of the AFSI research into these rabbis is startling.</p>
<p>A JTA report from October 25, 2009 stated that “The left-wing lobby J Street is absorbing Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom&#8217;s chapters and rabbinic wing.”</p>
<p>The national president of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom at the time of the merger was Steve Masters. Masters is a Philadelphia attorney and a former leader of the Philadelphia Chapter of the New Jewish Agenda. Jeremy Ben-Ami, the executive director of J Street, was introduced by Masters at a local kick-off event in Philadelphia on February 4, 2010.</p>
<p>Many of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom’s rabbis were among the founders and key activists of New Jewish Agenda including Rabbi Gerald Serotta, Arthur Waskow, Rabbi Everett Gendler and others. Serotta, Waskow and Gendler are also all involved in a group called Jewish Fast For Gaza – but more on that later. Waskow attended the February 4, 2010 event also.</p>
<p>It is well worth noting that many of these rabbis were first involved in an organization called Breira (meaning alternative) that was universally opposed by almost all sectors of the American Jewish community. I. L. Kenen the founder of AIPAC claimed that Breira &#8220;undermined U.S. support for Israel.&#8221;</p>
<p>The majority of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom/J Street rabbis hold radical views that go far past anything that even Breira advocated in its hay day.</p>
<p>Half of the  rabbis on J Street’s Advisory Council were members of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom’s  Rabbinic Cabinet &#8211; before the merge.</p>
<p>There is a very significant overlap between the rabbis from Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom and the Jewish Fast for Gaza group. Fast for Gaza made its first public announcement in July 2009. Rabbi Brian Walt was listed as the contact for the group’s initial press release. Walt is a member of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom’s Rabbinic Cabinet.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.fastforgaza.net/statement">Fast  for Gaza group purpose</a> is &#8220;To call upon Israel, the US, and the international community to engage in negotiations without pre-conditions with all relevant Palestinian parties &#8211; including Hamas &#8211; in order to end the blockade…&#8221;</p>
<p>Here are  the facts:</p>
<p>More than half of the seventy-eight rabbis listed on the Fast for Gaza website are also members of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom’s Rabbinic Cabinet. Put another way, about 12.5 % of all of Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom’s Rabbinic Cabinet are involved with the Fast for Gaza and call for talks with Hamas.</p>
<p>For example, Rabbi Arthur Green is listed by J Street as an Advisory Council member. Green is a former dean of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College (RRC) and was a prominent member of Breira. Another Advisory Council member is the former president of RRC, Rabbi David A. Teutsch. Rabbi Mordechai Liebling, a former director of the Jewish Reconstructionist Federation, is on Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom’s Rabbinic Cabinet and is a “Rabbinical Supporter of the Fast for Gaza”. Teutsch too attended J Street’s February 4, 2010 event.</p>
<p>Breira. New Jewish Agenda. Brit Tzedek v&#8217;Shalom. Reconstructionist Rabbinical College. Is J Street really just old wine in a new bottle? Has this wine turned to vinegar? Where are the likes of I. L. Kenen among today’s American Jewish leaders to stand up to J Street? An article on the website of the <em>Forward</em> newspaper (December 9, 2009) states that Israel&#8217;s Ambassador Michael Oren recently publicly labeled J Street as &#8220;a unique problem in that it not only opposes one policy of one Israeli government, it opposes all policies of all Israeli governments. It&#8217;s significantly out of the mainstream&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ambassador Oren should have been applauded for his statement. And loudly. After all, shouldn’t it be apparent to even the casual observer that forces within the highest echelons of the Obama Administration and/or the Democratic Party are assisting J Street, or perhaps even pulling its strings?</p>
<p><em>Moshe Phillips is a member of the Executive Committee of the Philadelphia Chapter of Americans for a Safe Israel/AFSI. The chapter&#8217;s website is at: <a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/www.phillyafsi.com" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">phillyafsi.com</span></a> and Moshe&#8217;s blog can be found at <a href="http://phillyafsi.blogtownhall.com/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">phillyafsi.blogtownhall.com</span></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/moshe-phillips/the-true-face-of-j-street-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Goldberg: Leon Wieseltier, Andrew Sullivan and Anti-Semitism &#8211; The Atlantic</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/jlaksin/jeffrey-goldberg-leon-wieseltier-andrew-sullivan-and-anti-semitism-the-atlantic/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jeffrey-goldberg-leon-wieseltier-andrew-sullivan-and-anti-semitism-the-atlantic</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/jlaksin/jeffrey-goldberg-leon-wieseltier-andrew-sullivan-and-anti-semitism-the-atlantic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Laksin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aipac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american jews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Frank Attic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti semite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti semites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apos s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calumnies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intemperate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel-basher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewish person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Wieseltier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pianist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[run-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a couple of observations about Leon and Andrew, based on a more careful reading of Leon&#8217;s piece, and a look back at some of Andrew&#38;apos;s greatest hits. 1 I don&#8217;t mean this as a cop-out, but Chait says much of what I would say, but better. 2 Like Chait, I don&#8217;t believe that [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of observations about Leon and Andrew, based on a more careful reading of Leon&#8217;s piece, and a look back at some of Andrew&amp;apos;s greatest hits.</p>
<p>1 I don&#8217;t mean this as a cop-out, but Chait says much of what I would say, but better.</p>
<p>2 Like Chait, I don&#8217;t believe that Andrew is an anti-Semite. I have no doubt that if Andrew happened to come upon a Jewish person being harassed or otherwise tormented, he would ride his ridiculous bicycle into the fray and beat back the anti-Semites with a stick. And he certainly passes the Anne Frank Attic Test.</p>
<p>3 But: His evolution from wild-eyed Zionist to vitriolic Israel-basher is one of the more painful things I&#8217;ve witnessed recently, and not only because we are friends, or were friends. In the old days &#8212; meaning last year, and before &#8212; Andrew was an intemperate defender of the Jews. I remember one exchange in the run-up to the Iraq War in which he told me that seeing the movie &#8220;The Pianist&#8221; made him even &#8220;more pro-war.&#8221; Now he has flipped, to the other extreme.</p>
<p>4 The question of whether Andrew is or is not personally anti-Semitic isn&amp;apos;t entirely relevant. What is relevant is that he sometimes uses his blog to disseminate calumnies that can cause hatred of Jews, and of Israel. I know this from personal experience, because the anti-Semites who e-mail him copy me. Andrew&amp;apos;s posts on Israel and on Jewish political power in America have lately given comfort to some very repulsive people. This doesn&amp;apos;t mean, of course, that the role of AIPAC shouldn&amp;apos;t be debated openly, but it should be done without prejudice; without the axiomatic assumption that American Jews who love Israel are disloyal to America; and without the Judeocentrism of the neo-Lindbergh set.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/02/weighing_in_on_leon_wieseltier.php">Leon Wieseltier, Andrew Sullivan and Anti-Semitism &#8211; Jeffrey Goldberg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/jlaksin/jeffrey-goldberg-leon-wieseltier-andrew-sullivan-and-anti-semitism-the-atlantic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Goldberg: In Defense of Janet Napolitano &#8211; Atlantic</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/jlaksin/jeffrey-goldberg-in-defense-of-janet-napolitano-atlantic/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jeffrey-goldberg-in-defense-of-janet-napolitano-atlantic</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/jlaksin/jeffrey-goldberg-in-defense-of-janet-napolitano-atlantic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Laksin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beginning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano - Jeffrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smuggling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[something]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yesterday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=43832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I know Napolitano said something exceedingly stupid yesterday (and has now retracted it) but here&#8217;s the problem with criticism of Napolitano &#8212; she&#8217;s been on the job for less than a year. The attacks of 9/11 took place more than eight years ago. For most of that period, it was the Bush Administration in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know Napolitano said something exceedingly stupid yesterday (and has now retracted it)  but here&#8217;s the problem with criticism of Napolitano &#8212; she&#8217;s been on the job for less than a year. The attacks of 9/11 took place more than eight years ago. For most of that period, it was the Bush Administration in charge. And what did the Bush Administration do about air security between 9/11 and the beginning of 2009, when they left office? Well, they managed to spend those years not installing the sort of body-imaging machines in our airports that might actually stop some terrorists from smuggling explosives onto airplanes:</p>
<p>via <a href="http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/12/in_defense_of_janet_napolitano.php">In Defense of Janet Napolitano &#8211; Jeffrey Goldberg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/jlaksin/jeffrey-goldberg-in-defense-of-janet-napolitano-atlantic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Sullivan Unhinged &#8211; by Peter Collier</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/petercollier/andrew-sullivan-unhinged-by-peter-collier/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=andrew-sullivan-unhinged-by-peter-collier</link>
		<comments>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/petercollier/andrew-sullivan-unhinged-by-peter-collier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 05:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Collier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amen corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional scrutiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creepy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical remarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dudeitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explication de texte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friend ron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gateway drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Rosenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffrey goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jew-hatred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levi Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likudnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Oren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron radosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[someone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul mate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teheran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torquemada-like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth teller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt-Mearshemerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worth undertaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=43748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blogger as slavish Obama apologist.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-43749" title="sullivan" src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sullivan.gif" alt="sullivan" width="450" height="299" /></p>
<p>Andrew Sullivan seems increasingly unhinged these days. The creepy, Torquemada-like obsession with Sarah Palin continues as he rummages through her book in a deranged act of <em>explication de texte</em>, functions as a one man birther movement laying out loony speculations about the owners of the orifices out of which Trig and Tripp slid, and continues to worship the sleazy dudeitude of Levi Johnson.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Sullivan slavishly justifies Obama on every count, including his administration’s sneaky efforts to smuggle “progressives” into policy making positions under the radar of Congressional scrutiny. Recently it was support for his appointment of Hannah Rosenthal as head of the Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism. Because she seems to share some part of his own fanged venom for Israel, Sullivan sees her as a Promethean truth teller being shut down by what his soul mate Pat Buchanan once called “the amen corner.”</p>
<p>After my old friend Ron Radosh rightly criticized her for attacking Israel’s U.S. Ambassador Michael Oren as a result of critical remarks he made about the egregious organization J Street, Sullivan hit him as a “neo con likudnik.” But when Sullivan tuned in to his own esteemed <em>Atlantic</em> colleague Jeffrey Goldberg for an opinion, Goldberg instead confirmed Radosh’s position, indicating that he was absolutely baffled that Rosenthal should make someone like Oren the first target of what is supposed to be a campaign against anti-Semitism. (Doesn’t she find a crusade worth undertaking in the way that the new addiction to Jew hatred has migrated from the Middle East to Europe and is presently getting established in our own country, where people like Sullivan can experiment with Walt-Mearshemerism as a no fault gateway drug?)</p>
<p>Even when Sullivan is good he’s bad. Today he gives good coverage to cell phone images of the bloody street action in Teheran. (And indeed, he has been good on Iran in all the months since the election was stolen.) But even here, his pro-Obama contextualizing of events neutralizes his support of the protestors. What moral does he draw from their incredible bravery in defying the regime’s street thug murderers? That the world is lucky to have “Obama’s reticence” at this critical moment because by not criticizing the obscene Iranian regime, our President “removes from Ahmadinejad the convenient weapon of demonizing the protests as pawns of the Great Satan.”</p>
<p>Take a moment to get this straight: it’s a good thing we have a president who, to keep himself pure for that ultimate negotiation on nukes that will never come, refrains from using some of that synthetic eloquence of his to put us on the side of people who are getting cut down in the streets. By such scurvy logic, it was wrong of Ronald Reagan to go to Moscow and speak to and about the dissidents and their heroic struggle against totalitarianism because it might have given ammunition to wardens of the gulag. And wrong to have been unequivocally on the side of Solidarity. And so on.</p>
<p>Word smuggled out of Teheran has told us that the protestors themselves would like a little U.S. affirmation so they won’t feel they are dying in the dark. And the citizens of our own country could certainly use the reassurance about the values we stand for, via a word or two in behalf of the demonstrators, especially after being subjected to a punishing year-long Presidential apology tour for American exceptionalism. But from Obama we get only beseeching admonitions that are far too little and always too late and always undermined by the reluctance with which they are delivered. This has become a vain, small-minded and morally anemic presidency that only someone like Andrew Sullivan could love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/petercollier/andrew-sullivan-unhinged-by-peter-collier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 1168/1254 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 11:23:50 by W3 Total Cache -->