|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Sure, what’s the harm of treating the ability to determine who runs the government like it’s a mailer from the Publisher’s Clearinghouse Sweepstakes?
There are several stories here.
First, mail-in ballots are absolutely not secure. 75% of the fraudulent ballots that she cast in the election in Washington State were counted. Only one was rejected due to a signature mismatch. And signature matching is one of those ballot verification features that Democrats have been combating and that they sidelined during the 2020 presidential election.
Second, voter fraud happens. And it’s not nearly the black swan event that opponents of election integrity claim. It’s rarely caught, but it’s also commonplace. Most small timers who do things like this don’t even take it seriously. They treat it like an extra lottery ticket. A chance to influence the process and put their thumb on the scale. People vote for deceased family members. They vote at multiple addresses. They vote for people who aren’t in town. Would they do this if it took more work than opening an envelope?
No.
Only the most committed would actually wait in line at polling places to cast phony votes. But when it’s as easy as opening an envelope, ticking a few boxes and then sealing up the envelope, a whole lot more people becoming willing to commit voter fraud.
And even when they’re caught, the damage is done.
A 52-year-old Pasco resident is accused of fraudulently voting in the 2024 election. Esperanza Contreras, an apartment building manager, was booked into the Franklin County jail Thursday afternoon on suspicion of 12 total counts including first-degree identity theft, forgery and second-degree theft.
It’s believed Contreras collected the ballots meant for the former tenants and was supposed to return the mail. Instead, she filled them out and mailed them back to the Franklin County Auditor’s Office.
The office’s signature checking caught one of the ballots, but missed the other three.
Contreras allegedly admitted to voting on all four ballots and forging the signatures. She told detectives she believed she was helping the former tenants.
Mail-in ballots can never be secure. They’re actually less secure than voting by phone. A phone could require biometrics or a password. A mail-in ballot can be used by anyone.
Ominous headline.
Of course, the massive fraud consisted of 4 votes, so 75% was 3 votes. I don’t guess it would’ve helped trumpie THAT much.
Multiply it by tens of thousands and it very soon adds up.
You’re a classic example of missing the forest for the trees.
For most logical and certainly honest people, it’s easy to understand that’ its easy to cast fraudulent votes in the mail Not even worth discussing. However our honest legislators should take this issue seriously.
Mail in ballots in my Cal. neighborhood in the last election:
Our mailboxes consist of one large metal box that houses many individual mailboxes for each resident. The mailman (all foreign born for the last 25 years+ in our area) delivered many ballots to the wrong mailbox. The residents, seeing that their name was not on the misdelivered ballot, simply left these ballots stacked outside of the mailbox so maybe the rightful owner would see it and pick it up. If I was dishonest like the dems, I would have picked up all of these orphan ballots, marked each for a vote for Trump, signed each ballot with an X (legal in Cal), and then drop them into the outgoing mailbox. There’s a thing called chain of custody and mail in ballots are a gross violation of chain of custody when it comes to securing ballots – but when you live in Newscum’s twilight zone, rules no longer matter.
Mail in ballots were a con from the start. They were marketed as a convenience to the voters. But the real reason was to make it easier to cheat.
Mail in ballots were the ticket that elected Biden. And Covid was the cover.