|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.
In Bedford, England, a child at a primary school plaintively asked at a school assembly why he was being forced to participate in an observance of Ramadan. As a result, all hell broke loose, with the school head, a Mr. O’Connor, writing to the boy’s parents to inform them that what their child did was very wrong, and was even, in fact, “racism” (though Islam is not a race). O’Connor went on to explain that such behavior was not to be tolerated, and would be noted down in their child’s record. More on this travesty can be found here.
In the UK, a child at a primary school was branded a racist for refusing to take part in Ramadan
The child said – “Why do we have to do that? I’m not doing that. Do I have to? If I don’t will you make me?”
The school responded – “This will be added to your child’s behaviour record and the schools log of racist incidents”
Here is the relevant part of the letter from the school to the child’s parents:
This will be added to your child’s behaviour record and the school log of racist incidents. If further incidents of racism occur, this will be dealt with in accordance with the school’s antibullying and behavioral policies, and may lead to further sanctions for your child.
At Bedford Primary School, we have a no tolerance approach to any form of racism. Any racist behaviour is unacceptable and contravenes the school’s policy, culture, and ethos. Please discuss this with your child and help them [sic] to understand that.
Get with the program, kid. Do as you’re told, and learn to appreciate diversity and inclusion at our school, or we will kick you out, not just out of class, but out of our school altogether. We’re against racists. And while you can, should you wish, skip Christian and Jewish holidays, don’t ever refuse to take part in a Muslim holiday again.
None of the political parties in the UK offer the clear choice of voting for an anti-Muslim immigrant party that would end all Muslim migration and deport many of the Muslims already in the UK. The latter group would include illegal immigrants, migrants who lied about their condition at home or their own status, for example by falsely claiming to be Christians, or homosexuals, and thus subject to persecution and even death in their home countries, and Muslims convicted of crimes. Implementing such a policy requires a recognition, however, that Muslims constitute an unprecedented threat to the survival of the West, for they despise Europe’s Infidels and look forward to the day when “Islam dominates and is not to be dominated.”
Muslims in the UK are voting more and more as a bloc, and this enhances their power. They are forming their own political groups, like that called the “Gaza Independents,” which has five MPs, including Jeremy Cornyn. As their name suggests, they are a one-issue group, determined to support Hamas and to turn the U.K. even further away from support for its ally Israel.
The ever-growing population of Muslims, whose rates of criminality, including street robberies, house burglaries, extortion, drug trafficking, and — most troubling of all — sexual assaults on young girls, are many times more than those of non-Muslims. All the while, these Muslim migrants cost the British taxpayers tens billions of pounds in annual support. They are in no hurry to be employed. Many of these Muslims have been housed in country inns in small towns, where their presence, and their criminal activity, is unsettling to the locals. Some Muslims, most maddening to the British, have even been placed in luxury hotels. After a migrant was arrested for raping a local girl in the small town of Epping, near Chelmsford, the residents of the town came out in force to the Bell Hotel, where migrants were being housed, to demand that they be moved elsewhere. The demonstrations in Epping then spread to many other towns across the UK, where other migrants, overwhelmingly Muslim, were being housed, and where they had committed various crimes that enraged the locals.
And now, even with all that taking place, British schoolchildren are forced to attend presentations on the glories of Ramadan.
We do have a new political party called Restore Britain.
Rupert Lowe is the founder & is a Member of Parliament
There are many people hoping that Restore Britain fails – we are being smeared in the most spectacular way. We will not be intimidated. We are not going anywhere. In fact, we’ve only just got started.
Thousands more join every day. We are going to get our country back.
Good luck Rupert you are our saviour.
Lowe is anti-Muslim, but he is anti-Jew as well. He stated openly that his goal is to ban kosher slaughter, which would force Jews to leave Britain.
Good point, No I do not think that he is anti-Jewish. He thinks that Halal slaughter is the same as kosher. He is totally wrong on that assumption. He needs to be told the difference.
I am surprised that no one has told him the difference.
In Halal slaughtering the poor animal has it’s throat cut open, then the animal is turned upside down to drain of the blood, meanwhile the beast is choking to death, suffering until it drops down dead.
In Kosher slaughtering The cut must sever specific structures: the trachea (windpipe), esophagus, carotid arteries, and jugular veins. The goal is to cause immediate unconsciousness through rapid blood loss while ensuring thorough bleeding of the carcass. The cut must be made in one continuous motion – any pausing, pressing, or sawing motion invalidates the slaughter.
After the cut is made, the animal is allowed to bleed out completely. This thorough bleeding is crucial because Jewish dietary law prohibits the consumption of blood. The phrase “you shall not eat the blood” appears multiple times in Jewish scripture, making complete blood removal a fundamental requirement of kosher meat preparation.
I will send this to Mr Rupert Lowe, so he knows the difference.
Have a listen. This is an excellent explanation of the three men Farage, Lowe and Habib and how we arrive at the three parties today and which has the best chance of electoral success and why.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1NdHffHt1q/
Britian will just have to fight racism by levying a F-tonne of racist fighting new taxes. They certainly have justification now that this boy displayed how racist the English are.
Patrol the social media of these little grade school f-ers and put a few in jail. In fact, just put all the indigenous Brit kids from his class.in jail and throw their parents in as well. Who knows, we may even try them at some point.
Coming soon Britian…
If you English ever decide to put your legs back together and get off your backs, you have to target the quislings first. Name, shame all that participate and no rhythm or mercy given.
MOST OF THESE SCHOOL TEACHERS ARE WOMEN _ AND LEFT-TARDED ONES AT THAT
THE FEMALES ARE THE WORST, MOST BRAINWASHED GLOBALISTS OF ALL
THIS IS EXACTLY WHY WOMEN WERE KEPT WELL OUT OF POLITICS AS A SECURITY RISK
If you don’t eat your meat, you can’t have any pudding!
How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?!
You!! Dhimmi – You behind the bike sheds! Stand still, laddie!
“This will be added to your child’s behaviour record”
I remember always getting threatened with getting something added to my “record” in elementary school.
Somewhere along the way, like in 7th grade, we realized there was no record so the threat lost it’s cache.
Dhimmi Britain surges in the European Islamopandering derby.
In relation to the statement that many Muslims are in no hurry to be employed, it should be noted that the expectation of Islam is that Muslims will live off the jizya paid by the subordinate dhimmis. In Britain, where the Dhimmis do not all accept a subordinate position, this takes the form of social security payments which are far from commensurate with a Muslim’s dignity and worth, but, nonetheless, are due tribute and not to be given up lightly.
Very minor point – the school is in Bedfont, Hounslow, not Bedford.
In the 16th and early 17th centuries, you could be in a lot of trouble if you denied the validity of the (Protestant) Church of England, concocted by Henry VIII when the Pope wouldn’t authorize his divorce from his first wife for “failing” to produce a male Heir–most likely, in fact, due to the syphilis and gonorrhea that eventually drove Henry insane.
He also looted churches and monasteries of their treasures and property.
Then there was the bloody English Civil War, with Cromwell and his Puritans slaughtering Dissenters, and especially Catholics, until Charles II returned from exile in France in 1660 to the relief of the English people, and the Good Times of the Restoration began.
It seems that Britain is now repeating the pattern, except with the suicidally perverse difference that today it’s mohammedism, rather than Anglicanism, that must be embraced.
Who could have foreseen that the Land of Magna Carta and the European Birthplace of Liberty would so willingly cut its own throat?
(ADDENDUM TO ABOVE):
Of course, anti-Catholic (or “anti-Papist,” as the favored term at the time was) feeling continued even after Charles II’s return.
Charles, suspected of being a “crypto Catholic,” kept wisely quiet about his personal religious faith, determined never to return to his “Travels” in exile. Credible reports by serious historians say that Charles, at his request, received the Church’s Sacrament of Extreme Unction (the “Last Rites”) on his deathbed from a Roman Catholic (“Papist”) priest.
In a famous incident, one of Charles’s many mistresses was traveling through the streets of London in a coach, which was stopped and surrounded by an angry mob.
Brazenly (and bravely!) stepping out of the coach, she addressed them: “My dear people! It is I, Nellie, the Protestant whore!” at which point the mob’s emotions did an instant about-face, and they triumphantly escorted her to the palace!