|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Have federal district judges peaked? Democrat judges, especially Biden judges, have been issuing insane rulings trying to stop President Trump from doing pretty much anything. These rulings are so bad that even Justice Kagan, hardly a Trump pal, was baffled by them.
I’ve argued that these rulings are literal lawfare, there’s no pretense that these various blocks are even legal, they’re there to force Trump to go to the Supreme Court. And then the Supreme Court, especially its weakest man, Chief Justice Roberts to mull over what the cocktail party set will say and cringe over being accused of being a rubber stamp for Trump. Meanwhile, each rulings ‘builds’ the Dem case for packing the Supreme Court.
In short, this is a multi-pronged judicial sabotage operation that has nothing in common with jurisprudence.
Now NBC News has interviews with a dozen ‘anonymous’ federal judges who are attacking the Supreme Court. Why are they anonymous?
“All 12 judges spoke on condition that they not be identifiable, some because it is considered unwise to publicly criticize the justices who ultimately decide whether to uphold their rulings and others because of the risk of threats.”
That’s absolute nonsense. Supreme Court justices are not going to change their rulings to punish institutional criticism. The judges want to be anonymous because they’re contemplating one day scoring a SCOTUS appointment and don’t want to be asked about this by Senator Faux Performative (R – Sorta) in a made-for-Youtube clip before he votes to go ahead and move on anyway.
Another reason for keeping the names anonymous is that some of them may not exist. (Would the media lie to us? Never!)
Finally, this is just the reflexive political operation by Dem big government employees who set up their ‘resistance’ cells during Term 1.
These people are not judges, they’re operatives.
The Supreme Court, a second judge said, is effectively assisting the Trump administration in “undermining the lower courts,” leaving district and appeals court judges “thrown under the bus.”
The Supreme Court has an obligation to explain rulings in a way the public can understand, a third judge said, adding that when the court so frequently rules for the administration in emergency cases without fully telling people why, it sends a signal. The court has had strong left-leaning majorities in the past, but what is different now is the role emergency cases are playing in public discourse.
Maybe federal judges should not be constantly granting emergency pleas from the ACLU and other leftist lawfare groups to block Trump actions on a global scale.
This is an abuse that the Supreme Court is being forced to constantly counter only to have fed judges then complain that the Court is rapidly countering their moves with little explanation.
This is Cloward-Piven stuff meant to break the Supreme Court.
A judge appointed by President Barack Obama said that while the Supreme Court could do more to explain itself, some lower court judges had been out of line in blocking Trump policies.
“Certainly, there is a strong sense in the judiciary among the judges ruling on these cases that the court is leaving them out to dry,” he said. “They are partially right to feel the way they feel.”
But, the judge added, “the whole ‘Trump derangement syndrome’ is a real issue. As a result, judges are mad at what Trump is doing or the manner he is going about things; they are sometimes forgetting to stay in their lane.”
Sure, some may be mad, but this is a deliberate coordinated tactic, not just emotion. And some of the fed judges behaving this way, again especially Biden appointees, show no signs of understanding laws or lanes.
“Judges in the trenches need, and deserve, well-reasoned, bright-line guidance,” a judge said. “Too often today, sweeping rulings arrive with breathtaking speed but minimal explanation, stripped of the rigor that full briefing and argument provide.”
Please. Spare us.
Federal judges grotesquely abuse their authority in unprecedented ways and then pretend that they lack guidance from the Supreme Court. This George Constanza “Was that wrong? Should I not have done that?” is pathetic playacting.
“A judge who spoke to NBC News expressed frustration that judges’ role in the judicial system is being undermined by the Supreme Court’s frequent interventions, before there has been extensive litigation and, potentially, a trial.
“It’s very discouraging,” the judge said. “We are operating in a bit of a vacuum.”
Federal judges have a role in deciding cases, not in issuing nationwide blocks every time Trump does something.
It’s district judges who are the ones sidelining “extensive litigation” and a trial by issuing their emergency blocks every time the ACLU sneezes and have the chutzpah to complain about shadow dockets and Supreme Court interference when they try to play shadow presidents.
The agenda here is a massive power grab. It’s a war against the Supreme Court, the Constitution and the rule of law.
You hit the nail on the head. They are operatives in resistance cells. Just like the current Federal Reserve, the judiciary is not independent now, they are working for foreign powers to undermine the U.S. Trump is seeking to restore independence to the judicial branch and the Fed. Hopefully ending the Fed is the final goal.
A crooked judicial system is so frightening , it could be one of the first things to trigger a Civil War imho .
I don’t know about “working for a foreign power.”. They’re simply working for the DNC, which is bad enough.
A bunch of low IQ judges picked by Schumer for just this thing, all he wanted them to do is harass every policy Trump came out with the libs are morons they have no policy.
The bar for congress to impeach them is high but it is much lower for them to be fired for not serving with good behavior. Serving with good behavior is a condition of their employment and stated in their employment contracts.
And who is to do the firing?
He belongs in Prison with Soros, Gates both the Clintons and Coffee Cup Annan
Thanks for not blinking at this obvious corruption of the federal courts, Mr. Greenfield. In his day, George Orwell also recognized the fundamental problem: “We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.”
John Roberts is the worst person to ever serve on the USSC. No integrity, no backbone. He’s a joke.
John Roberts is the worst person to ever serve on the USSC. No integrity, no backbone. He’s a joke.
“In short, this is a multi-pronged judicial sabotage operation that has nothing in common with jurisprudence.”
I get it. Never let the left hand know what the right hand is doing. Isn’t that the Democrat purist definition of politics?
Law & Lawfare are two peas in the same ‘beloved’ Rule of Law pod. Law & Lawfare are two sides of the same Rule of Law coin – without one the other could not exist. Lawfare dates back to at least Hammurabi’s Code. Rule of law became America’s favorite weapon for creating instant criminals out of entire ethnic groups – Chinese with opium, Mexicans with marijuana, Catholics with alcohol, and Black Americans with heroin. While lawfare dates back to ancient times, America’s drug-based version has been the playbook for 150 years. Lawfare happens *EVERYDAY* across America. The Rule of Law isn’t broken in America. It’s working exactly as intended – as a tool for those in or out of power to maintain control.
What? Odd place for communistic comment. The individual people who live in US ,of varied original backgrounds, are not being served well by our current corrupted legal system.
Law was all we had. A nation of laws. Blind Justice. This phony college freshman focus on supposed group membership – your favorite ones and pointedly leaving out others – is what led to ruination of blind justice and a land ruled by laws mot not men. All we have is a cabal on men now.
Your chosen victim groups now rule. Through corrupt men. Individual men and women citizens are left on side of road, with no voice.
You’re either very young or very stupid.
Actually I believe they all are fake. They do not exist, it’s another lie in a blizzard of lies so one more big whopper should be of no surprise.
“…it is considered unwise to publicly criticize the justices who ultimately decide whether to uphold their rulings…” – They’re really just saying that’s what they would do. They have no business being judges, and their rulings are reflecting that. They don’t need guidance, they need to stay within their power and apply the law. They’re playing stupid, while undermining themselves, and trying to blame SCOTUS for it.
As you said Daniel, they’re politcal operatives. They’re protecting the party and the bureaucracy, while smiting the party’s enemies. The level of corruption in the judiciary and prosecutors’ offices is scary. Soros sure got his money’s worth, much of it surprisingly cheap.
Rouge Judges like this should be removed from the Courthouse and retired
robe-*******, proceed @ your own risk
Change the law and make judges accountable for their decisions.
How anyone can believe that a federal district judge in Massachusetts may enjoin someone in Hawaii is a blooming mystery. This era of one-size-fits-all rulings/whims needs to cease or the law iS arbitrary and capricious.
What would you say if the topic were, say, slavery? Certain adjudication must be federal in scope. One solution may be to separate trial decisions from penalties applied, like nationwide injunctions, which might be better decided at the higher level appeals court, or some such.
I’m a magistrate in a state court of specialized jurisdiction. It is very common for appellate courts to issue ambiguous decisions. That said, anytime a complaint seeks an injunction against the Federal Government, the Federal Government should have the right to get the case transferred to the DC Circuit.
Leftist judges are trying to force Trump into one of two untenable positions: first, to tie up the administration altogether; second, two provoke Trump into declaring martial law so that the idiot Left can literally run riot in the streets and try to take by force what they could not win at the ballot box.
I think Trump needs to go ahead and declare martial law and round up these troublemakers. They mean him and us no good and it is useless to continue playing this game. Using military courts, throw outthese judges who are playing this obvious game and then seek their disbarment. Put the shipment of illegal aliens into high gear. Throw Ketanji Jackson off the court as stupid and unqualified or vice versa.
In short, Trump has to become our Pinochet. No lawlessness and for sure no murders and killings, but end the nonsense. Quit playing around with these America haters and restore America.