UK Muslim Migration Explodes After Muslim Official Put in Charge

Order Daniel Greenfield’s new book, Domestic Enemies: The Founding Fathers’ Fight Against the Left: HERE.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer had promised to accomplish historic things and to unite the United Kingdom, and with the worst approval rating in British history, he has managed both.

Currently, only 20% of the UK approves of Starmer while 70% say that they do not like their leader. The UK hasn’t been this united since there was an empire. All against one man.

This comes after Starmer’s regime had been caught arresting over 1,000 people a month over social media posts for a total higher than Cuba or Venezuela. While Starmer had failed to keep any of his promises about fixing the economy or ending Muslim mass migration, he did oversee a police state with the highest rate of speech arrests in generations. And it didn’t even help him.

Starmer is now the most unpopular of the country’s aspiring leaders and while none of them are especially popular (even the monarchy polls as underwater) he is by far the most widely hated of the bunch. This is what the media kindly calls a ‘likability deficit’. The last Labour party leader to have approval ratings this bad, Jeremy Corbyn, openly supported Islamic terrorists.

The current Labour Party leader claims not to support Islamic terrorists, and yet imposed a virtual martial law on protests against Muslim mass migration, appointed Shabana Mahmood, a Muslim politician with a history of support for Islamic terrorism, in charge of national security, covered up Muslim sex trafficking in British teenage girls, and recognized an Islamic terror state inside Israel. If that’s not support for the Islamic takeover of the United Kingdom, what is?

But it’s the Muslim mass migration that is one of the more urgent matters for voters.

The Starmer government had spent a fortune on a publicity campaign claiming that it would be able to turn back the migrant boats swarming across the English Channel, carrying Afghans and other Muslim migrants, who invade the UK, claim asylum and then commit horrifying crimes.

“For over two centuries, the Home Secretary has safeguarded the nation. Today, we begin a new chapter as we welcome Shabana Mahmood to the Home Office as the new Home Secretary,” the Starmer government announced last September.

Mahmoud, already an official in the Starmer government, was put in charge of turning back the invaders despite her previous Islamist ties, protests on behalf of ‘Palestine’ and claims that the real threat comes from British flag wavers. “The people you see holding the English flag most of the time down my neck of the woods will be the EDL and they are white and they are male and they’re bad people,” she had previously declared. If only the boats had carried English flag wavers.

While much of the migrant invasion was coming from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and other Muslim countries, Mahmood began to bluster against Christian African countries like Angola, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, threatening them with a visa ban, while very tellingly giving Muslim countries a pass.

Mahmoud had no interest in stopping the mass migration of her fellow Muslims, just the opposite, and she achieved another set of very ‘historic’ results for PM Starmer.

More migrants crossed the Channel under Starmer than under any other PM.

Hundreds of migrants have taken to crossing every single day for a total of over 65,000 on over 1,100 boats under PM Starmer so far. Mahmood is promising that she’ll get the numbers down, at least of Christian migrants, admitting that “I can’t give you a timeline of exactly when all of that will happen.” The answer is pretty clearly never. And then the day after never.

Meanwhile the Muslim migrants continue to prey on the native population, especially young girls, with a ‘small boat migrant’ from Afghanistan recently convicted of kidnapping and raping a 12-year-old girl and another who raped a 15-year-old girl near his migrant hostel. Afghan Muslim ‘refugees’ have been caught going back and forth between the UK and Afghanistan making a mockery of the notion that they’re refugees rather than profiteering migrant tourists.

While officially PM Starmer is under pressure to resign over revelations from the Epstein files, in reality much of the public is far angrier about funds being cut for the elderly and given to Muslim migrants, and broken promises about turning back the boats and restoring law and order.

The only law and order in Starmer’s UK is Islamic Sharia law as the regime innovated the first prosecution for blasphemy against a protester who burned a Koran before being stabbed by a Muslim bystander who was quickly released and as it has waged war on anyone noting on social media that Muslim mass migration threatens the survival of the United Kingdom.

The migration process has long ago become a sham with a tribunal ruling that an Afghan with gray hair was really a teenage boy whose hair must have turned gray because of “stress”.

The British public has had enough of this farce and signs show that they’ve had enough of Starmer. Labour tested a campaign slogan about ending the chaos (that it then passed on to the Biden and Kamala campaigns) but what their movement is offering is far worse than chaos.

Growing numbers of even Labour voters suspect that PM Starmer never really intended to stop the mass migration and that his slogans were lies meant to lull the public into a false sense of security even while ruthlessly stamping out any dissent by arresting those pointing out the truth. But the censorship regime and the arrests of thousands of people for telling the truth failed to fool the public. If Starmer goes down, the official party wags and the media will blame the Epstein files, but they should really blame ‘Home Secretary’ Shabana Mahmood.

Did Starmer really believe that Mahmood would block her own people from invading the UK?

If so, Starmer is not only the most historically unpopular prime minister with the historically largest surge of mass migration, but he will also go down as the historically biggest fool.

And at this rate, he may soon be history.