|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”]
(Trigger warning: extensive and unfortunately necessary descriptions of Islamic toilet practices.)
How many Islamic toilets is a Muslim terrorist entitled to? At least two.
That’s the ruling by a U.S. federal judge in the long running saga of a UK Muslim terror imam locked up in a Colorado prison who called for murdering non-Muslims and wants those same non-Muslims to tend to the ‘purity’ of his nether regions so he can properly pray to ‘Allah’.
And so begins the most disgusting article I ever had to write: in both the moral sense of how far backward we bent to cater to Muslim terrorists who hate us and on a grosser physical level.
The current Toilet Jihad began with a real Jihad that claimed at least four lives.
In 2007, after three years of legal wrangling, Imam Abu Hamza, an Egyptian Muslim cleric who headed a notorious UK terrorist mosque, was finally deported to the United States.
With the occasional eyepatch and a hook for a hand, a souvenir of his time working with the ‘Pakistani military’, the piratical looking cleric had preached terror at his Finsbury Park Mosque and his tawdry life and terror threats had long been a staple of British tabloid coverage.
Hamza’s involvement in the 1988 kidnapping of British tourists in Yemen, four of whom were killed, by an Al Qaeda affiliate, (the cleric explained that taking hostages was “a good thing” in Islam), his mosque, which had attracted such terror figures as the ‘twentieth hijacker’ and the ‘shoe bomber, his defenses of Al Qaeda (“Bin Laden is a good guy, everyone likes him in the Muslim world”), claim that 9/11 was “done in self-defense” and declaration that “the person who hinders Allah’s rule, this man must be eliminated” had made him the UK’s most notorious imam.
By the time the US asked for him, after he tried to set up an Al Qaeda training camp in Oregon, the UK was happy to send him off. Hamza’s lawyers however spent three years dragging out the case in the UK, claiming that sending him to America would violate his “human rights”.
In 2015, after eight more years of legal wrangling in federal courts, Hamza was sentenced to several life sentences, on charges of providing support to Al Qaeda and the Taliban, hostage taking and, as the judge put it, being “barbaric.” But Abu Hamza was just getting started.
After 11 years of lawfare and extraditions across three countries and continents, Abu Hamza had a lot of free time in prison. And he spent it waging lawfare against the United States.
Abu Hamza, now calling himself by his legal name of Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, filed lawsuits accusing the prison system of violating the First Amendment by denying him Halal food, participation in group Islamic prayers, communications with his son (unclear if it’s the one who was stripped of UK citizenship after becoming a Jihadist in Syria, the one who was convicted of money laundering, the one who stole a laptop through a kitchen window or any other sons.)
The terror imam also claimed that “his faith requires him to be provided with an electric toothbrush”, a hairbrush and prompt toenail clipping services at taxpayer expense.
`Mostly though, Abu Hamza aka Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, was obsessed with the toilet.
Muslims have detailed toilet protocols that Sharia requires them to follow. They must step into the bathroom with their left foot first. They may not have their backs to Mecca when they defecate. Men may not urinate while standing up. Muslims are required to wash their private parts with water after urinating or defecating. Muslim men then have a specific prescribed process for removing the remaining urine to ensure that they are ‘clean’ to pray to Allah.
Ideally, the less we know about all this the better, unfortunately having Muslim terrorists in prison, and specifically a Muslim terrorist with a hook for a hand and a lawyer on speed dial, and a lot of time in which to sue America, means that we have to deal with the ‘Toilet Jihad.’
What’s at stake here? (And feel free to skip this entire paragraph.) The website of the Grand Ayatollah of Iraq describes it as following: “the middle finger of the left hand is slid three times from the anus up to the scrotum; then, the thumb is placed on the penis and the forefinger is placed under the penis, and the thumb and forefinger are pulled three times along the penis up to the point of circumcision; finally, the end of the penis is pressed three times.”
This is not about hygiene, in the medical sense, but a religious practice from Sharia law.
All of this is serious business for a devout Muslim like Abu Hamza because while he believes 9/11 and taking hostages are good things, he is mindful of Mohammed’s warning that “most of the punishment of the grave will be because of urine” (Sunan al-Tirmidhī 348). While Hamza feels no guilt over the deaths of Ruth Williamson, Dr Peter Rowe, Margaret Whitehouse, and Andrew Thirsk in Yemen, he believes that if he prays while there’s urine still inside his organ, he will burn forever in Islamic hell without getting his 72 virgins.
(Questions as to why the cleric thinks hell would be more concerned with his bodily fluids than his role in the murder of a 34-year-old Scottish nurse are best addressed to the Islamic religion.)
Back when Abu Hamza was locked up in the UK, ”Mr Mostafa had someone to help him”. Colorado’s Supermax prison, unlike Belmarsh in the UK, “does not provide any inmates with personal attendants for the purpose of washing them after using the toilet” because that would “place a substantial burden on ADX staff or require additional staff at a substantial expense to the Bureau of Prisons.”
How Islamophobic. So Abu Hamza sued.
According to Abu Hamza’s lawsuits and complaints, Islamic law and the First Amendment entitle him to having someone properly clean him after using the toilet “essential for my 5 prayers daily.” The prison already went to the trouble of outfitting his two cells with showers with multiple showerheads, including a lower showerhead, and allowed the terrorist imam to run the water as long as he likes, but that wasn’t good enough. (Nothing turned out to be good enough.)
The prison tried accommodating his amoral, but bodily waste obsessed belief system, by giving him a brush. Hamza claimed that the “brush was ineffective” at achieving his spiritual goals of not being tormented by Satan in the afterlife for achieving less than totally clean nether parts.
Abu Hamza demanded a bidet. The prison argued that it does not provide bidets to anyone “regardless of religion” so it’s not discriminating against Islam. It’s just worried about items that can be used as weapons. Finally, it gave in and “requested funds” to install a bidet.
Because American taxpayers are paying for every last bit of this. Including the lawsuits.
But much like Hamas and every Islamic terrorist group, having gotten what he wanted, Abu Hamza denied that he ever wanted it and demanded more. Even though there’s documentary evidence of him saying that a bidet was enough, he denied ever agreeing to that, and demanded new prosthetics, despite apparently sabotaging several efforts to fit him with a new hook. The bottom line is that Hamza would like “attendants to help him complete ritual washing”.
That means having someone on standby several times a day to clean him up to Islamic standards each time he uses the bathroom. Not because he actually needs it for hygiene purposes, but because the same religion that made him murderous, demands it.
A federal judge agreed to consider “whether defendants have substantially burdened the exercise of Mr. Mostafa’s religion by limiting him to use a bidet to clean himself.” That same judge ruled that “Mr. Mostafa has demonstrated that forcing him to be housed in a cell where he lacks a means of ritually cleaning himself places a substantial burden on the exercise of his religion” and that the prison must install a bidet in both of Hamza’s prison cells, not just one.
Only two Muslim toilets will do. For now.
And then it’s only a matter of time until another judge rules that the taxpayers must pay for an attendant to clean Abu Hamza before he prays to Allah for their cruel deaths or it’s a burden on the exercise of his religion. Religious accommodation won’t be reached until the prison not only provides new prosthetics for Abu Hamza, but ones strong enough to let him behead infidels.
Meanwhile, six figures have likely been spent on legal battles involving Abu Hamza’s Toilet Jihad. All of this could have been averted by following another traditional Islamic practice.
The death penalty.
“most of the punishment of the grave will be because of urine”
This is not a religion. This is an exhibitionist sadistic fetish.
Can anyone possibly explain why Western people’s willing humiliation by muslims is even a thing. Could anyone who “tolerates” and supports this humiliation in the name of “rights” or “compassion” or even masochism please explain it. Islam never existed for me for the first fifty years of my life. There were zero islamics and zero hijabs in my big city hometown until after 911. I lived half a century never seeing islam where I lived. In an online video of crowded downtown streets in the 1970s younger commenters all were astonished — wow there are no hijabs. They couldn’t believe that hijabs did not exist in their city back then. They didn’t exist and then suddenly they were everywhere. How? Why? Why did we allow this? Why was debate about islam crushed the way dissent about covid shots was crushed by fellow citizens’ witchhunt-like social censure?
After 911 islam began openly pissing on Western people and most of them seemed to love it because it was “multicultural diversity”, their new “religion”. Now masses of them are marching in the streets championing muslims’ “right” to urinate on non-muslims and attack Jews and rape white girls. It’s a nightmare that I can’t wake up from. It just gets worse and worse.
My wish at 70 is to live in my city or any place where there is no islam and no hijabs (hate jabs — symbols intended to jab infidels in the face with islam — we’re here, fucker, this is our place now). Some place where I never hear or see or know or think about islam or hijabs or allah’s urine ever again like I did for five glorious decades of islam-free life. There’s a tiny remote island in Scotland’s outer Hebrides that I once researched as a potential islam-free relocation spot (my grandparents were all from Scotland) and then I read that the island’s local christian church built a mosque there for the muslim “refugees” the church proudly sponsored and imported. This is beyond madness. This is a death wish.
I lived in Iran and Indonesia in the past—two Muslim majority countries. There were almost no hijabs ever seen! Suddenly in the years since 9/11 even in those countries there is the explosion of a return to 14th century practices. Does that tell you all this is political rather than religious or what?
You kindly omitted idiotic. It is a world envisioned by Patty Hearst.
Its called Super Max for a reason. It holds the worst of the worst. No special privileges and and judge who says different must be overturned.
The judge who overturns should serve time with these animals
Should have executed him. Would have saved a lot of trouble.
Ban Islam.
Deport Muslims.
I totally agree.
Islam is a death clut, poison to western civilization. Animals.
Why not use some of THEIR “laws” against them? If they have the “religious” obligation to kill infidels then why can’t infidels do unto them first?
That would make much too much sense in today’s gender fluid world
Do unto others as they would do unto you BUT DO IT FIRST.
i like that: do unto them what they would like to do unto you and me.
btw, the Jewish Torah is even more blunt: If someone comes to kill you, rise up early and kill him first
(of course, kneejerk liberal jews don’t know this dictim, they distort Judaism and make it into a pacifist, supine religion.)
Another reason terrorism or support for terror of any kind needs the death penalty.
If Israel had the death penalty, there would have been less incentive to take hostages had there been no terrorists in Israeli custody.
Correct. And Jihadist’s bodies should be desecrated in such a way that even Muslims would know that they would not be rewarded in the next life. I suggest that the bodies be diced, cooked and fed to pigs.
Perhaps all maximum security prisons in the U.S. containing brutal
murderers, rapists, thieves, pedophiles and psychopaths such as
Abu Hamza could be turned into not places of punishment but into
citadels of piety. Especially in conjunction with the Defund the
Police – Rely More on Social Workers movement. For example,
there is no reason why water can’t be hauled in from the Ganges
River or some other sacred site for the religious cleansing rituals
required by Hindu prisoners. With all religions being simultaneously
catered to – even during lockdowns for stabbings or the like – it’s
safe to say prisoners would soon convert to the various religions in
droves.
/s Still it is truly likely that the Left would be genuinely inspired to
such aspirations from just the idea of some Muslim monster’s ritual
cleansing of his crud-infested gonads – and his attendant outrageous
demands. Personally, I love the ending of this article and agree with it
100%.
Mostafuck Camelturd Mostafag probably ripped of his little junk with his Captain Hook claw years ago, so there is that.
Italian paper: [With the war over, the law of jihad returns]. The decimation by Hamas. They are always the barbarians of October 7th
https://justsayingitoutloloud.blogspot.com/2025/10/italian-paper-decimation-by-hamas-they.html
This terrorist with paruresis should be told that his lawsuits results in an award for violating his rights amounting to $10 million. The announcement would add, “Urine the money!” Then if he touches the very moist money, he forfeits the decision.
Better yet, just shoot the bugger while trying to “escape”.
Or shoot him for not trying to escape.
Sounds like the sort of things they get up to in a Gay Bathhouse
Ol’ Captain Hook should thank Allah every day he’s not in a Russian or Chinese prison. In those places, prisoners don’t get food or water for days, let alone Shariah law compliant toilets.
Toilets in jails and probably prisons are steel rather than ceramic because the animals in those places can break ceramic and stab each other with the shards. Unfortunately I know that thanks to my psychotic and psychopathic ex wife in Omahell Nebrascum. Omahell. No place for decent human beings, much less real men. Just barnyard animals and incels. People can say what they will about California but at least the cops here tend to be decent human beings except for the few bad seeds. If some scumbag crawls through your window at 3 am, they’ll come arrest him here. The cops in Omahell are the cowardly scum of the Earth and all douchey white knights and gelded girly men. Do something about what I wrote, you pussies.. It’s free season on your asses here in CA.. Except for this big black one who would beat up gutter trash in the dark North part of town, where Malcolm X was from. I heard about him from some of the scum who got their butts kicked so I like him even though I never met him because I’m not a criminal.
Big dumb guys make good cops, like Alec Baldwin said.
I wonder how he picks his nose without gigging himself, much less wipes his butt. He probably ripped his sack off a long time ago.
That might explain the histrionics?
Yeah, he’s singing soprano.
Anyone this obsessed with their penis and anus is definitely homosexual.
Islamopithecines like their fat butt boys, that’s for sure. The guys who hate gays are always the gayest. Insecure about their failed masculinity, I guess.
They got their religious practices from their prophet – Dirty Mo.
Give him three rocks, as the koran prescribes, to wipe his arse.
Make sure they are nice and sharp, and that’s all he gets.
As for running water 24 hours a day, islam is a product of desert bandits, who used sand to cleanse themselves, not water, because it was to precious to do other than drink it.
Do they even have toilet paper there? They probably just wipe on goats.
“the person who hinders Allah’s rule, this man must be eliminated”
Did he just say that non-Muslims have the ability to obstruct the will of Allah?
Isn’t “bacha bazi” considered a religious mandate?
And what about the goat whisperers?
What about drinkin camel pee? https://rumble.com/v323tf-people-in-morocco-drink-camel-urine-for-medical-reasons.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_m&sci=0431a142-cf2f-42f3-b7bb-243d101c1e85
They actually drink that! I saw them doing that on TV. I nearly hurled. And they pay for it!
Keep them out of America at all costs.
Haw ha HAW! Pillow talk to goats, LOL.
If the silly judge were required to function as this wanker’s personal attendant for a month, there would be no more silly rulings by judges.
Yet, no mention of the judge’s name. I assume it is a woman appointed by THE OBAMA.
For Chrissake (and mine) can’t we simply kill this clown? I don’t care how. Why are we wasting the tax payer’s money on his B.S. lawsuits.
I’m no expert on religion, much less Islam, but how could Mohammed deliver a mandate for an electric shaver in the 6th century?
Well that is why he is highly revered in the most primitives places on earth, I presume.
They need them for their crabs and lice.
I had that once in Thailand, it was very tasty.
So even in FRONT PAGE this idiot judge is allowed anonymity?
Why?
No surprise to read he was a doorman for a peep show in London.
They are all phonies and we are chumps for going along with this nonsense. Every bit as insane as gender dysphoria.
This legal delimma reminds me of a practice I learned of in ancient China. Among the aristocracy, it was considered proper to use one hand for feeding and the other for cleansing the body. It was also considered an insult to serve someone food using the wrong hand. If a nobleman displeased the emperor, he was not executed outright. He was made an example of by having a hand amputated, thus forcing him to feed and cleanse with the same hand. To save his dignity, he would starve himself to death. Men were men in those days, unlike this whining little peice of crap.
Do what Hamas did, give him a 3X6 foot cell with a bucket and a thin mattress. End of discussion.
Ban Sharia Law throughout the United States. Would that not end this idiocy?
Yes ban it everywhere
I think this matter shows why Islam requires slavery. Whilst the court attendant who cleaned Henry VIII’s posterior was honored with the title of the Gentleman of the Stool and a sizable yearly stipend in the Muslim world it would more likely be a non-Muslim slave tasked with this function.
Rabid Islamic dogs have no rights, they aren’t human.
Is there no end to this obscene appeasement? Surely, we’ll next hear that the pornographic judge kissed his ass. Who is the judge? State or federal should be removed from the bench or outright impeached.
if this thing had been executed there would be no need for his shira law rights.
I used to work in a UK prison which held a number of frail elderly sex-offenders (their advanced age was due to the time-lapse between the offence and arraignment). They had genuine need for help with looking after themselves, and these needs were met by prison cleaners or “Trusties” (who presumably were given some sort of care training, and were paid at pocket-money rates). If Super-Max has trusties, would this not be an economic way of dealing with this situation?
The other thing is – what do these sharia requirements say about Allah? Certainly not that he is an entity whom we should revere and love, nor indeed that he has anything in common with the God of Israel.
Two solutions. First, there should be no ‘rights’ once proven guilty of a criminal offense. (I thought that was the way it was, or used to be). ??? Second, remove the offending appendage ! Problem solved.
After writing my previous comment, it occurred to me how desperately sad it is that anyone should be so obsessed with sanitary minutiae, when he could be in relationship with the living God.
For Muslims, there’s no coming back from eating a bacon sandwich.
Just sayin’.