|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”]
There is a common observation making the rounds on social media these days: “When people show (or tell) you who they are, believe them.”
On Friday, the House of Representatives passed bipartisan Resolution 719 honoring the life and work of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated on September 10 while speaking peacefully to a crowd at Utah Valley University. His (alleged) killer appears to be a Left-radicalized 22-year-old with a transgender romantic partner. Estranged from his MAGA-supporting family, the (alleged) shooter apparently believes, as does a shocking number of his comrades in the Democrat Party, that the cold-blooded murder of political opponents they deem to be “fascists” is morally justifiable self-defense.
The House voted 310-58 to pass the resolution, which noted rightly that Kirk was a “courageous American patriot” who aimed to “elevate truth.” It also condemned political violence and extended condolences to Kirk’s widow and young, fatherless children. The yea votes included all 215 voting Republicans and 95 Democrats, but does it come as a surprise to anyone that every one of the 58 naysayers is a Democrat? In addition to those 58, whose vote confirmed that they feel no compunction to denounce the unconscionable tactic of murdering one’s political opponents, another 38 Democrats voted merely “present” (meaning they claim to disapprove of the assassination but couldn’t bring themselves to endorse honoring its Republican victim), and 22 more did not vote on the resolution at all (purportedly either because of a scheduling conflict – which should never be an excuse; voting is their job, for God’s sake – or more likely because they opposed the resolution but didn’t have the balls to put themselves on the record).
So, yes, 95 Democrats approved the resolution, but many more – 108 – either openly opposed it or hedged their bets for whatever reason.
This is who the Left are. They are not, as they paint themselves, the party of compassion, tolerance, and inclusion. They reserve their compassion not for actual victims like Charlie’s wife and kids but for criminals, who they believe are society’s real victims – of systemic racism and capitalist exploitation. They tolerate and include only those who march in lockstep with their destructive ideology; those they exclude from their ranks are perceived to be existential threats who must be eradicated by any means necessary. We are deplorables, Nazis, white supremacists, fascists, haters, misogynists, Islamophobes – everything except human beings and fellow Americans, because we stand in the way of their singular lust for permanent political hegemony.
After the vote, the White House rapid response team wrote, “58 Democrats just voted against a simple resolution honoring the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk after his assassination last week. Disgraceful.”
It is more than merely disgraceful. It demonstrates that a sizeable percentage of the Democrat side of the House could not even summon the basic humanity to mourn the cruel murder of a fellow American, whose life was snuffed out because his political opinions did not align with progressive orthodoxy. Kirk was murdered by a sniper’s bullet not only because he dared to peacefully challenge the belief system of his opponents, but because many of those opponents were listening. He was opening up many previously closed minds, and the totalitarian Left – like Islam – cannot tolerate its members questioning the ideology and possibly turning apostate.
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) blasted the Democrats who voted against the resolution, posting on X, “History won’t forget. Neither should we. These 58 Democrats voted against condemning Charlie Kirk’s assassination.” She proceeded to list the last names of all 58, who included the usual radical suspects such as James Clyburn, Maxine Waters, Jasmine Crockett, Al Green, and “Squad” members Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, Delia Ramirez, and Pramila Jayapal.
History won’t forget. Neither should we.
These 58 Democrats voted against condemning Charlie Kirk’s assassination:
Amo
Beatty
Bell
Bishop
Brown
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Crockett
Davis (IL)
Escobar
Espaillat
Fields
Figures
Foushee
Frost…— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) September 19, 2025
AOC, a woman who could very well be the next Democrat presidential nominee, even had the gall to send out, after voting no on the resolution, an email purporting to condemn Charlie’s “horrific assassination and the scourge of political violence” – a scourge for which her side of the political fence is entirely responsible – but at the same time urging her supporters, “We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was,” a man whose beliefs and rhetoric “were ignorant and sought to disenfranchise millions.” This is a flat-out lie designed to dehumanize Charlie and the entire MAGA movement as bigoted threats to democracy. The end result is that the political violence and assassinations against American patriots will continue, if not intensify.
But by coddling, if not encouraging, political violence and exposing who they really are, the Left has made a fatal strategic misstep. It was shocking enough when President Trump narrowly and miraculously escaped assassination at the Butler, Pennsylvania rally a year ago; but the shooting of Charlie Kirk has triggered a seismic shift. His influence, as widespread as it was in life, is surging worldwide after his death. Millions here and abroad throughout the Western world are beginning to wake up and embrace his commonsense, conservative message promoting faith, family, and country. At the packed memorial for Charlie in Arizona today, attended by the President, Dr. Ben Carson urged, “Get onboard” with “the revival that is coming.” Trump adviser Stephen Miller declared, “You have no idea the dragon you awakened.”
Awakened dragon, indeed. As I have noted elsewhere, the Right didn’t want this civil war in which we are engaged, and we didn’t start it. But we are going to end it, and make America great again.
Follow Mark Tapson at Culture Warrior

The abomination of human evil and the willingness of those who willingly sacrifice human life on their idolatrous altars while castigating those in the world who REFUSE to be a part of it.
WE CHOOSE LIFE!!!
We pray for Charlie’s family and for their futures to be imbued with deep love, support, encouragement and understanding from family, friends and a world demonstrating love in action!
May Charlie’s memory be a blessing.❤️
To exemplify their shame, these 58 Dems have reacted narcisistically and spitefully against a good cause.
The Dem-O-Rats would rather Open Our Borders Disarm us Open our Private Property and our Homes Illegal Aliens/Future Democrat Voters and Supporters since their mostly Globalists/Traitors
The evil Dems/Marxists will win so long as Republicans can’t find a spine to truly fight back. So far Republicans are still looking for a spine.
Here is an apt backhanded tribute to the gun-shy Dems…
The leftists have lost their humanity.
Are you saying they actually had any humanity at one point?
I can guarantee you that the democrats who voted in favor of the resolution only did so because their district required them to do so. Democrats want to make it clear to their supporters that they applaud and approve of assassination attempts against their political opponents. This is what Barack Obama meant when he said “reward our friends and punish our enemies”.
“AOC, a woman who could very well be the next Democrat presidential nominee, even had the gall to send out, after voting no on the resolution, an email purporting to condemn Charlie’s “horrific assassination and the scourge of political violence”.
AOC, along with the rest of the Squids are scumbag C*nts. I most certainly hope she becomes the next Losercrat Pres. nominee. The oppo ads write themselves.
All you have to do is say she opposed the simple resolution that honored Charlie Kirk and his legacy. And it won’t do any good to find a Demonrat who did vote for it because there are enough progressive idiot voters who agree with AOC
LoserCrats in action.
Charlie Kirk was martyred in the satanic assassination. Now Charlie Kirk is a legend. And we need this powerful movement to thwart the izzylamik and communist threat that has infected our nation and the western nations.
USA, fortunately, has the 2nd Amendment. This will stop any f’ing sharia from what they do in Arab nations!
Nonetheless, we have the demoncRats who are working with the communists and izzylam and hence we have the vile demonKKKRats that are utilizing antifa type tactics and cancel culture and frankly, they belong in a gulag, a concentration camp, a reeducation camp. Democrat party is the enemy of USA and the portal letting these jihad sharia terrorists in the USA and in CONgrASS.
I saw this video at 3AM this morning:
FBI Agent: “People Have NO IDEA How Serious This Is Going To Be
Former FBI agent John Guandolo talks about the main objectives of the Islamic world, and it isn’t good
Christianity is definitely NOT the answer if you want to make America great again. The irrationality of Christianity is the problem.
The Christian ethics of self-sacrifice, self-abnegation, self-immolation, and renunciation are the basis of socialism and collectivism.
America is being sacrificed to the swine of the earth just as Jesus was.
“Christ, in terms of the Christian philosophy, is the human ideal. He personifies that which men should strive to emulate. Yet, according to the Christian mythology, he died on the cross not for his own sins but for the sins of the nonideal people. In other words, a man of perfect virtue was sacrificed for men who are vicious and who are expected or supposed to accept that sacrifice. If I were a Christian, nothing could make me more indignant than that: the notion of sacrificing the ideal to the nonideal, or virtue to vice. And it is in the name of that symbol that men are asked to sacrifice themselves for their inferiors. That is precisely how the symbolism is used.” – Ayn Rand
If you want to make America great you’ll have to embrace, champion, and teach Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism at the universities. It is the ONLY way to save America and the West.
Your assumption that faith and logic cannot coexist reveals your true ignorance of the rigorous reasoning of those of faith.
Your idolatrous worship of Ayn Rand and your elevation of her as a bastion of logic repeatedly loses credibility as her emotionality was a repeated source of her malicious criticism of her devotees and her monstrous malevolence toward Nathaniel Brandon when he dared not doing as she dictated.
Humans have both reason and emotion and those for whom faith in G-d is foundational in their lives are also individuals who are successful scientists, physicians, cosmologists, astrophysicists, those of scientific inquiry in the geological sciences to name a few.
One of the most irrational postulates is that of the universe coming into existence by the big bang courtesy of Lemaitre asserting that the universe began from a single dense point he referred to as a dense, primeval atom and that the universe has been expanding ever since. How rational, however, what is the composition of an atom? It is composed of protons and neutrons, positive and negative charges and they are the fundamental building blocks of matter. But, where did these building blocks of matter come from? There had to be a first cause because however well positioned Lemaitre’s assumption,
that which exists cannot come from nothing into something. That which exists is by definition created. Thus 0+0=0
In order for the universe to exist, it must have a first cause that is not created and that is G-d. That is mathematics and reflects the incredible complexity of the laws governing the created universe. Hardly the irrationality you so easily attribute to those of faith. I would suggest that “rationalists” like yourself and many atheistic cosmologists are, in rational fact, given to belief in assumptions that upon rational scrutiny evidence themselves as without the kind of scrupulous adherence to scientific inquiry required. Instead, leaping in acts of blind faith without ever considering the fundamental nature of their axiomatic assumptions, they act in presumption that these are fundamental truths existing without the need for evidence.
So, who is really irrational??
Same stale stupid message, as always.
I don’t think you are going to get what you want.
Bitter table for one, T.
You need a new grift.
The ethics of Christianity are DEADLY and self-destructive. The wife of Mr. Kirk is so indoctrinated into Christianity that she actually said she FORGIVES the evil assassin that murdered her beloved husband and father of her children in cold blood.
In REALITY some evils are absolutely unforgivable. The assassination of Mr. Kirk is one of them.
You cannot get any more ANTI-LIFE and anti-happiness than these counsels of Jesus of Nazareth, follow them at your own risk —
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[i] and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
THX once again showing his stupid. Using Ayn Rand as your authority on Christianity makes about as much sense as using Bugs Bunny. Cartoon philosophy is no way to go through life.
You are truly a heartless person with absolutely no sense of what is important.
100,000+ people at State Farm Stadium plus the excess at another arena obviously disagree with you and probably never heard of the wicked witch you worship.
Charlie Kirk had the energy to be on the road 200 days out of each year he spent building Turning Point USA. He had the ability raise money and turn young people to his way of thinking by being positive. The Christian message obviously resonates. Turning Point will continue to grow. The Objectivist message crashes and burns all the time.
You are nothing like Kirk, sitting in that stupid apartment of yours, occasionally writing, copying and pasting Aynus Rand tomes and bitter little comments on a lightly traveled website. You have absolutely no influence over anyone and you never will.
It is not your business whether Erika Kirk chose to forgive the little fag or not. He is nothing. Neither is his furry lover.
Oh yeah, neither are you. So keep sitting in that flea ridden hovel of yours, clacking away on that old computer, wondering why Objectivism never caught on. Perhaps it is because of asslings like you. After all, reading a few of your posts would only inspire potential terrorists to emulate a leftist assassine.
Understand that this was not a vote against Charlie Kirk, this was a vote to protect the Dems Marxist ideology. We could consider this as evil vs good. In the last few years the Dems have publicly doubled down on the darkness that they embrace. Since the creation of man when the light shone in the world, certain people have embraced the darkness and protest the light. This defines the progressives. They cannot sleep unless they cause harm to SOMEONE. The sooner we understand their position the sooner we can join forces against them. The assassination of Charlie put the blame at the feet of the Marxist Dems. They are now identified as the purveyors of darkness. It is the title that they cherish so let’s join in and call them what they are. Shout it out all over the landscape of America and fulfill their wishes.
No surprise here. The Democrats have been nothing more than a criminal gang since the days of Aaron Burr.
Charlie Kirk did the same thing Socrates did 2400 years ago–he publicly humiliated others by winning arguments and exposing ignorance and stupidity. And both men met the same fate. I always had a bad feeling watching him debate and win every time.
If you removed some letters from the word Democrat(CRT) you would get the word Demon add a S make it Plural Demons