|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.
The IDF has now said that Israel’s goal was never to change the regime in Tehran itself, but to so weaken the regime’s power to repress its citizens as to create the conditions for the Iranians themselves to change the regime. There is a difference. More on Israel’s goal can be found here: “Senior Israeli defense sources: Iran regime change not military goal, creating conditions for it is,” by Yonah Jeremy Bob, Jerusalem Post, March 11, 2026:
As doubts about the prospect of imminent regime change in Iran spike, senior defense sources have told The Jerusalem Post this is not and never was a military goal.
Rather, the IDF always hoped to enhance the conditions that might make regime change in Iran possible if the domestic opposition to the government would be ready to take to the streets again in sufficient numbers to topple the regime, the sources said.
The military would look positively at regime change and wanted to try to help the process, but it never had illusions that military action by itself would guarantee such an outcome, they said.
The primary purpose of the current war for Israel was to destroy the immediate threat posed by the roughly 4,000 ballistic missiles that Iran was thought to possess, consisting of both those that survived the attacks last June, and of the roughly 200-300 missiles produced by Iran in each of the eight months since then. A second goal was to continue, along with the Americans, to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, by re-attacking those enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and in Isfahan, that had been greatly damaged but, as we now know, not “obliterated,” in the Twelve-Day War, as well as a secret underground nuclear compound outside Tehran, recently discovered by the Israelis, where scientists were working on key components for nuclear weapons. The compound, known as Minzadehei, was targeted after Israeli intelligence tracked activities at the site linked to covert weapons.
The IDF attacks on weapons arsenals, the command-and-control centers, and the senior leadership of the IRGC and the Basij militia, and attacks on nuclear sites, are meant to remove imminent threats to the Jewish state. But another result of these attacks will be to weaken the power of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and the Basij to cow the Iranian people, 85% of whom are against the regime. Israel does not believe that it needs to keep fighting until regime change is achieved; that’s a tall order, and no more than the Americans do the Israelis want to be stuck for many months to a Tar Baby in Iran. They instead hope to “create the conditions” for the Iranians themselves, emboldened by the weaken ing of the forces of oppression, to return to the streets by the millions to demand an end to the regime. And the battering of Iran’s military will also, so it is hoped, cause members of the IRGC and Basij to begin to quit or even to defect to the side of the protesters.
The IDF has been destroying so many of Iran’s ballistic missiles, missile launchers — about 80% of those Iran had at the beginning of Operation Roaring Lion have been destroyed — and plants where the missiles are produced, that within a few weeks that threat from ballistic missiles will have been effectively eliminated. The IDF has also struck IRGC leaders and killed most of its senior leaders, and has destroyed their weapons storehouses.
The IDF has killed the supreme leader, and wounded his son who was chosen by the Assembly of Experts to be his successor. It has also killed about 50 members of he senior leadership, both civilian and military. But regime change was never the objective for the IDF, even if Prime Minister Netanyahu has suggested otherwise. Creating the conditions for regime change — meaning so weakening the regime militarily that it will no longer be able to frighten would-be protesters from going back on the streets by the millions — is quite enough for the IDF. And that is what the IDF is hoping to achieve before well-appareled April takes its bow.
Photo Credit: Creative Commons.

You cannot make peace with people who are taught from birth to want to kill you, are happy to die to kill you, celebrate when they die killing you, and promise to keep killing you so they can celebrate some more when they die killing you.
All you can do is kill them first before they die killing you.
That is the sad but Politically Incorrect Truth.
For thousands of years people all over Europe and the Middle East slaughtered, persecuted and expelled Jews as they pleased, secure in the knowledge that the Jews, stateless and powerless, could do nothing to defend themselves.
Jews lived at the mercy and at the pleasure of the people of whatever place they happened to be.
Now Jews have a state and a military and the means to try to defend themselves as best they can from those who are determined to slaughter them and are happy to die in the process.
And the Politically Correct Peace Loving people who are used to Jews lining up and dying quietly just cannot stand the thought of Jews defending themselves.
If the establishment of the State of Israel means anything, it must at least mean this:
No one gets to kill Jews for free anymore.
Can someone explain why neither Israel nor the U.S. are arming the Iranian Resistance to give them a fighting chance at Regime Change?
If anyone was doing it, it would be a covert operation. So if done well, no one would hear about it. Let’s hope this is the case.
Semantics. I believe regime change has always been the plan. If the Iranian people don’t stand up (they won’t after seeing 30K killed) Israel will push for the regime change.
So long as Islam survives, there will be armed enemies of God seeking to conquer the world. Islam was invented to organize the Arab conquerers of the Mediterranean in the Seventh Century, and Satan has used it ever since to fight for worldwide darkness. Islam or a similar discipline of hate will be with us until the last day, and we are called to defend ourselves and our culture from it.
Iran, like all nations with Islamic majorities, need to be secular, Radicals can’t run a shoe-shine stand, let alone a government. Just check out any Islamic State, all are remarkable failures because Sharia law doesn’t protect their minorities.