India: Chaos at Bengaluru Airport After Midnight Standoff

Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”

In the early hours of November 16, a tense and potentially dangerous incident unfolded at Bengaluru’s Kempegowda International Airport when a taxi driver, identified as 36-year-old Suhail Ahmed Pyarejaan, a resident of Jayanagar, suddenly began running through the pickup zone near Terminal 1, brandishing a long knife. It has been reported that he was chasing two other drivers, Jagadeesh J R and Renu Kumar. The incident was caught in VVIP CCTV footage that the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) released. It shows Suhail charging at the two men while gripping the blade, sparking absolute panic among bystanders.

CISF officers, led by Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Sunil Kumar, responded swiftly. Within seconds, they overpowered Suhail, disarmed him, and secured the weapon, preventing any injuries. The accused and the other taxi drivers were then handed over to the KIA police, who have registered a case.

A preliminary inquiry into the knife attack does not hint at any terrorist activity. The attack could have, however, led to fatal injuries. Hence, the accused has been arrested under the Arms Act and remanded to judicial custody, according to police sources.

This incident is alarming as it comes just days after a major security scare in India’s capital, the Delhi bomb blast, raising fresh questions about airport and public-space security in major cities. While the Bengaluru event does not hint at any terrorist activity, the rapid escalation to a weapon-wielding confrontation in the middle of a busy and major international airport underlines how transport hubs remain vulnerable to Islamic jihad violence.

Indeed, similar knife attacks in public spaces in other countries have had far graver consequences and sometimes terror motivations. In London, on November 29, 2019, Usman Khan, a convicted terrorist released on license, carried out a deadly stabbing spree during a rehabilitation event at Fishmongers’ Hall, London Bridge. He carried two knives taped to his wrists, threatened to detonate a fake suicide vest, and killed two Cambridge graduates, Jack Merritt and Saskia Jones, before the public pinned him down and armed police shot him. Before this, in June 2017, three attackers, Khuram Butt, Rachid Redouane, and Youssef Zaghba, rammed a van into pedestrians on London Bridge and carried out a stabbing rampage in Borough Market, killing and injuring many. In another case, in Nice, France, on October 29, 2020, Tunisian national Brahim Aouissaoui stabbed and killed three people in Notre-Dame basilica; later arrested, he was convicted and sentenced to life in prison for a terror act.

We can easily find many more examples, as there is no shortage of such incidents, and the disturbing similarities among them are impossible to ignore. The perpetrators consistently emerge from the same religious background, and their attacks often follow an eerily similar pattern. Whether it is a well-planned act of terror or a sudden fit of rage, what is most unsettling is how effortlessly they seem able to pick up a deadly weapon and rampage through public spaces with the explicit intention of injuring, and possibly killing, people.

Back in Bengaluru, the airport attack adds to the city’s growing security concerns. Bengaluru, a global technology hub, has increasingly been on law enforcement radar for such flashpoint incidents. One notable example is the Rameshwaram Cafe blast in Whitefield on March 1, 2024, when an improvised explosive device detonated inside the café during lunch hours, injuring several. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) later linked the blast to an ISIS-oriented module. It arrested individuals, including Mussavir Hussain Shazib and Abdul Mateen, suggesting that even places of leisure are not immune to jihadist plotting.

Now, with the Bengaluru airport knife episode, ordinary people are growing insecure in the political environment in a state that the Congress Party governs. That party is infamous for its overt minority appeasement to secure Muslim votes. The Congress government was reported earlier this year to be proposing a Muslim quota in government tenders, a move that sparked sharp debate across the political spectrum. Earlier this month, in the neighboring state of Telangana, Congress Chief Minister Revanth Reddy sparked fresh controversy by declaring, “Muslims mean Congress, and Congress means Muslims,” a statement that his political opponents and non-Muslim commoners widely condemned.

Such rhetoric from political leaders who openly seek to court the Muslim vote while disregarding the risks of jihad recruitment within the community sends a dangerous signal that jihadist-leaning elements can act with greater audacity, unafraid of administrative repercussions, thereby putting the safety of ordinary citizens at risk. This is not an issue confined to Congress-governed Indian states alone. While India stands as the most prominent example, similar patterns have been observed globally, where governments pandering to the Islamic groups have struggled to rein in jihadist elements and uphold law-and-order stability.