|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”]
After blowing through $1.5 billion to lose an election, Kamala is back. And wants to run again.
“I am not done,” Kamala Harris declared. “I have lived my entire career as a life of service and it’s in my bones.” The terrible polls won’t be stopping her because “if I listened to polls I would have not run for my first office, or my second office – and I certainly wouldn’t be sitting here.”
Kamala’s previous presidential campaign foundered when she couldn’t explain what the Harris-Walz administration would do differently than the Biden-Harris administration. This time around she can’t explain how she would run any differently in 2028 than she did in 2024.
107 Days, her campaign book, blames everybody and everything else for her defeat, including the Biden team, racism, sexism and only having 107 days in which to figure out who she was.
470 days later and counting, Kamala Harris is still claiming that Biden was “competent to serve” and couldn’t explain what she would have done differently except that we have to “do better”.
The only notable difference a year later is that Kamala has taken to swearing on camera.
The 2024 version of Kamala pitched “joy” while the 2025 one has taken to saying “F__” a lot.
“Are you f_____ kidding me? This guy wants to create a ballroom for his rich friends while completely turning a blind eye to the fact that babies are going to starve when the SNAP benefits end in just hours from now!” Kamala ranted on Jon Stewart’s podcast. “I’m not going to be distracted by, ‘Oh, does the guy have a big f_____ hammer!?’ What about those babies?”
While Kamala appeared somewhat inebriated in that podcast, this seems to be her new brand.
On her book tour for 107 Days, she screamed that “to have some level of concern and care, if not basic f____ curiosity for other people” only to have her audience break into wild hoots and applause at the F-word.
“Right. I’m just like, ‘f___ it!'” Kamala showed off on another podcast.
At a Hollywood event about ‘misinformation’, Kamala claimed that “we are living history right now” and then shouted, “these m______” are crazy.”
The old Kamala used word salads, the new Kamala uses obscenity salads. She nerves herself up, shouts an obscenity into the microphone and then starts laughing at her perceived naughtiness, like discussing a sex scene in an Oprah book club, as the audience cheers.
Adding an F___ here or there doesn’t actually make Kamala any more coherent, but it distracts the audience from the senselessness of what she’s saying. The more she swears, the less you notice the random non-swear words that she arranges into a sentence like a broken chatbot.
But the carefully calculated Fs are another symptom of her hollowness. Rather than figuring out how to talk about the issues voters care about, Kamala tinkered with her personality again.
Voters, she has been told, are angry and value authenticity, they’re drawn to outsiders, and Kamala Harris decided to give them authenticity in spades by sounding angry and throwing out occasional curses. “’Oh, does the guy have a big f_____ hammer!?’ What about those babies?”
The voters wanted authenticity, but she misheard that as obscenity.
This is what Kamala was doing during those 107 days. Rather than understanding voters, she went into a hall of mirrors, played with her hair, adjusted her personality and then brought out celebrity guests. When that personality didn’t work, she tried on another one and another one. Elections are a costume party in which she dresses the part in the hopes of getting the job. That’s why we met Kamala the prosecutor, Kamala the social justice advocate, Kamala the wine aunt and Kamala the party girl, the one person we never met and never will is the real Kamala.
And there may not be a real Kamala. While we know there is a real Obama, the one we only occasionally see peeking through the angry cracks in his studied routine, there’s every reason to think that she’s all surface, a living hall of mirrors with no self deeper than the one we see. Kamala can’t relate to voters except by shapeshifting into another ‘relatable’ version. If you don’t like Kamala 3.0, try Kamala 4.0 who drinks on camera and says “F____” sometimes.
And if that one doesn’t work, well there’s at least 1,000 more days to go until 2028.
The new F___ Kamala isn’t any more appealing than the old one, but she is tapping into the fury of her base, the Hillary base, of upper middle class liberal women who hate Trump, but have no real strong political views beyond imitating whatever is popular on their social media feeds.
They instinctively recognize that Kamala, like Hillary, is one of them, having long ago sacrificed any hope for a normal life on the altar of ambition, who also tries to keep up with a pop culture that she’s too old for and who are frustrated that their non-existent talents are never sufficiently recognized after being promoted several levels above their actual competence and usefulness.
Kamala is relatable to them, but to no one else, and to a party whose base is already sliced so microscopically thin that it hardly exists outside of a few downtowns, bedroom communities and college towns, that’s not the best strategy. The only reason that Kamala, like her old peer and rival Gavin Newsom, got anywhere, was the willingness of some very rich people in the Bay Area to fund their ambitions. But $1.5 billion later, the Bank of Kamala is permanently closed.
And so Kamala is angry. The anger is slopped all over 107 Days: a book so toxic that it made a candidate that everyone in her party already hated that much more unelectable because it revealed that she’s not really angry at Trump, but at everyone in the party who didn’t do enough for her. Kamala resents Biden, his inner circle, Obama, and just about everyone in her party.
Democrats hate their party also and that gives them a limited common ground with Kamala. It allows her to go on tour while blaming some nebulous group of insiders for not propping her up and that’s where the relatability falls apart. Dems are angry because they believe that their party didn’t fight hard enough while Kamala is angry that they didn’t pander to her hard enough.
When Kamala shouts “F____”, she’s mirroring their anger, but not the real reason for the anger, and yet she’d like to harness that anger all the way through the primaries and to the nomination.
Gov. Gavin Newsom, even more of a chameleon than Kamala, who got started in politics by watching VHS tapes of Bill Clinton speeches and adopting his mannerisms (right down to chewing his lip during times of emotion) and then adding obvious echoes of Obama and Trump into the mix for a shapeshifting goulash, has now also started trying to sound very angry.
Unusually, Gavin’s got a point.
By 2028, Dem voters will be up to a boiling pitch of fury. Every nominee will be raging, throwing out “F____”s like the vulgarity store was having a Black Friday sale and trying to mirror their rage. Kamala, Newsom, Buttigieg and AOC, their faces red, their fists clenched, their feeds emojied will bestride the stages of New Hampshire and the caucasus of Iowa and scream.
As Joe Biden, who by then may well be dead or institutionalized, once told Obama, “it’s a big F____ deal.”
Yeah, their obscenity is deliberate, for political effect.
Or Kamala can simply revert to her original personality, a dumb courtesan
Courtesans have education and training in many fields to be a suitable companion to a great man. Sex was important, of course, but not the whole package. If courtesans had a public voice, they would be offended a twat like Kamala is considered one of them.
I do remember where Schumer’s advisor told them to use the word extreme every time they mentioned Republican then within the following weeks, I heard all Democrats mimic for mine.
Recently, I heard a similar Democratic advisor telling them to use the F word, I laughed and thought that would pass.
Little that I know within a week 10 Dems were using the F word every opportunity they had.
Yes, they are like bots
The wine aunt? Do you mean “the wise aunt?”
Probably not lol
Book tour? Does anyone believe that she can write?
“F this, Nazi that, F this, Nazi that, F this, Nazi that…..”
This is the extent of the Dem’s in depth discussion of the details and specifics of their policies and plans to convince voters that their vision for America is better. Pathetic.
Trump gets away with it exactly because he is authentic and doesn’t have to put anything on.
I guess because she drops F bombs she will become more relatable to the “brotha’s.”
James 3:3-11 “Behold, we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body.”
“Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth.”
“Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!”
“And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.”
“For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind:”
“But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.”
“Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.”
“Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.”
“Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?”
And your point is? Kamala is going to change the world? Or, whatever, I haven’t a clue what your quotes meant for the Kamala article.
Ok, above there is: “…she’s giving them obscenity.”
Why?
Matthew 12:34 “…out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.”
Via the tongue; and James chapter 3 says a lot about it.
Baruch Spinoza: … men govern little with more difficulty than their tongues, and can moderate their desires more easily than their words.
And yet she will more than likely be the next governor of The People’s Republic of California.
Harris – F— Off B itch
what else would you expect from a stupid f**king c*nt that belongs to the d-RAT party of ignorant f**cking degenerates?
More often than not, use of profanity betrays intellectual vacuity. When an artful interjection is profane for effect, the learned ear can tell. True obscenity, for example, the prurient exhibition of sexual intercourse or the graphic depiction of bloody murder, offends all who retain the vestiges of civilization.
Ms. Harris is obviously inarticulate, and her use of the f-word is just a variation on her word salads that, in her mind, makes her more like the younger audience that seems vulnerable to Democrat socialist nostrums. As with everything “progressive,” true believers will forgive her so long as they find her useful. Consequently, hers is a low-risk strategy to capitalize on polarization between Americans who love our nation and its traditions and the others who find no merit in our history and seek to overturn our institutions.
In the end, she will be tossed aside like Trotsky.
profanity is a true indication of a poor education and the losing argument . the mark of a true democrat .
The appeal to vulgarity is juvenile and a tool of the inarticulate. Her use of the F word is a direct appeal to those whose understanding of complex systems, such as politics, is beyond comprehension once it passes out of the emotional stage. My advice to Ms. Harris, when it comes to politics, would be for her to simply say: F this!
Trump Won You Lost Sweetie get over it
Knowing Kamala as we do, she’s probably even inept at using foul language. But there is help. Effective swearing is both a skill and an art. And she could definitely use some help: