|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.
A Ramadan Message During Lent Leaves Many Britons Questioning Their Leaders
Buckingham Palace had confirmed that King Charles III would not deliver a formal Easter message to the British people in 2026.
This contrasts with the warm video message he shared for Ramadan, praising Islamic fasting and unity.
The message, widely broadcast, called for healing divisions and building a better world.
For many Christians in the UK and Commonwealth, the lack of an Easter message feels deliberate. The monarch, supreme governor of the Church of England, showed warmth to one faith while staying silent on the most important celebration of the faith he is expected to defend.
This is not about following an old tradition.
Queen Elizabeth II gave a special Easter message during the COVID-19 pandemic, and King Charles shared a Maundy Thursday reflection last year that mentioned Christ before including other traditions.
This year, that pattern changed.
The Palace has said that an Easter broadcast is not an annual event like the Christmas address, but the timing, coming after a high-profile Ramadan message during Lent, has left many Britons questioning their leaders’ priorities.
The symbolism matters.
Britain’s identity and values are rooted in the Judeo-Christian heritage Easter represents: resurrection, renewal, and forgiveness.
These are the foundations of parliamentary democracy and individual freedom.
When the Crown celebrates minority faiths but downplays the main celebration of the majority, it signals a step back from tradition.
This recalls failures I’ve reported on in grooming gang scandals, where authorities hesitated to confront abusers for fear of being called “racist.”
Multicultural priorities overshadowed protection.
Now, a similar selective sensitivity appears at the Palace: a reluctance to affirm Britain’s Christian heritage as confidently as for other communities.
Demographic changes may also play a role.
Official projections show that Muslims could become the largest faith group in some major British cities within a generation.
British Muslim communities often have a stronger connection to their religious identity than many nominal Christians. In response, public institutions try to balance integration with accommodation.
Some people see this as creating a two-tier system for faith and culture, which could undermine social trust and make the historic majority feel excluded.
King Charles has said before that he wants to be a “Defender of Faith” in the plural.
Now, that change in language is becoming real.
A simple Easter message, reaffirming the Christian hope of resurrection, would have cost nothing but meant a lot: showing continuity, confidence, and clear leadership.
Without it, especially after the Ramadan greeting, some may feel that British heritage is up for debate while other identities are protected.
This is not about being hostile to any community.
Britain has welcomed newcomers for generations and can keep doing so, as long as integration means embracing the values that made the country a beacon of freedom.
Real tolerance comes from strength, not from erasing oneself.
When the monarchy, as a symbol of national continuity, seems to favor new observances over traditional ones, it speeds up the same kind of division that allowed grooming gang cover-ups and limited free speech in the name of harmony.
The British people, whether Christian, secular, or otherwise, deserve leaders who defend the faith and culture that built their civilization.
Easter 2026 was a clear opportunity.
That opportunity was missed.
Having worked on both sides of the Atlantic to expose institutional failures that put British girls at risk for the sake of political correctness, I see this royal silence as part of a bigger test. Will Britain’s leaders regain confidence in the Judeo-Christian roots that support the rule of law and social unity? Or will they keep trading heritage for a fragile sense of unity?
The lack of an Easter message suggests uncertainty.
The British people, and the West in general, deserve better.
The Crown still has time to lead with clarity before this cultural retreat cannot be reversed.
Photo credit: Hayden Soloviev at Wikimedia Commons.
If King Charles III really , truly has chosen the Islam ‘s Ramadan in favor over the Christian Bible based doctrine of the resurrection of Jesus from the tomb three days after he died and was placed in it , there is no way he could be a Christian, regardless that he’s officially the head of the Church of England
For that’s where the real foundation of Christianity is the resurrection of Christ from the dead, First Corinthians 15:1-6. To it more strongly, if Jesus didn’t rise from the dead the entire religion of Christianity if false, it’s a hoax. The Bible confirms this statement. First Corinthians 15:12-19.
Roman guards has been stationed at the tomb of Jesus to make sure that His disciple would not be able to steal the body of Jesus and then make a false claim of His resurrection, Matthew 27::62-65.
Besides the disciples of Jesus too scared to do much of anything but run away and go hiding, Matthew 26:55.
Furthermore, if those disciples did, somehow, steal the body of Jesus and then falsely claim the he rose from the dead. They would be fools to then to give and risk their lives on what they knew is false report and a lie.
Besides, I had been to the Jerusalem and seen such an ancient tomb and it has large rock covering to its entrance. If the body of Jesus had been stolen, there would have been much ground disturbance at the difficult task at moving such a large heavy rock covering. Therefore, a hoax resurrection could be easily discovered and exposed as a hoax.
Shame on King Charles., he’s a disgrace and dishonor a country what is still officially a “Christian nation..”
With this news about King Charlies largely disregarding the most important Bible doctrine of the resurrection of Jesus in favor of Islam’s Ramadan further reveals his being so very favorable to Islam , just maybe the King had been proselyted to Islam or not, he favrs Islam ,with the politically correct climate in England he must have had conveniently forgotten about the deadly results of Islam in the United Kingdom. Such as the murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls. Before that, there was those deadly London which happened on July ,7, 2005.
Likewise, the King seems not to remember the deadly jihad train bombing Islamic vehicle and knife jihad attacks. London nor does the King appear recall the Muslim terrorist who, in London murdered a British police office with a hatchet attempting to cut off his head. Worst of all that murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls The deadly dangerous posed by Islam’s violent and murderous jihad hasn’t gone away in the UK. Therefore, it’s shameful that the King is “bending over backwards” to appease the Muslim mayor of London and the imams as well as the other Muslims in power in the government in the United
He has had a seemingly strong affinity with Islam for many years and less so for Christianity.
Cancer once in awhile is ally, in fact to be celebrated. Poetic that he has such a short reign.
One can only hope that there are no pain meds and since he is already horribly disfigured that he is soon unable to speak.
William is also on record as being an Islamopanderer.
King Charles was photographed wearing islamic garb long before Princess Dianna was killed…
Also… Princess Dianna was with a satanic worshiping muslim the night she died… he was driving…
Google AI Reports:
“While he is a practicing Christian, he has often spoken publicly about his admiration for the Islamic faith, culture, and its contributions to the world, which has led to persistent, inaccurate speculation about his religious affiliation.”
…
I doubt he practices the Christian faith at all…
Since when do you practice the Christian faith. You couldn’t the essence of Christianity with two hands and a flashlight.
These just a few of your favorite stock phrases:
satanic worshiping muslim
fake god of satanic islam
poop this and that
ELCA satanic islam
satanic catholic fake church
The satanic quran
satanic catholicism is NOT a Christian Church…
Ooops typo alert
You couldn’t find the essence of Christianity
These are just a few
There is an ‘idiot’ gene within that family….and Charles has it to the fullest extent.
Something not right about that man…and I think it is genetic….Edward the VIII possessed it…he was the one who was running around with the Simpson woman…
There is a defective ‘something’ in that family….I believe Harry has it….and I pray that it was not passed down to the children of William and Kate.
I suggest that Charles is worried that if he does not kowtow to the soon muslin majority that they will abolish the monarchy.
He is spawn from Inbreeding.
He is clearly enjoying DHIMMI Life.
Get used to it Britain.
The Church of England? What’s that?
He’s not my king.
He’s a liberal hypocrite just like the rest of them.
Charles in NO king! Jesus THE MESSIAH, is KING and Him alone!
They pretty much already practice Sharia law in England, the part that mandates that thou shalt not slander the prophet under penalty of death. The British are so afraid of muslims that you cant criticize Islam in public anymore there.
I have decided to bestow the title ‘King Chuckles the Apostate’ on this man. He is a traitor to the religion he is sworn to defend and he is a traitor to his country by taking the side of foreigners and their foreign religion against the indigenous people who created this modern country under Protestant Christian morals; of honesty and hard work.
Chuckles appears to prefer the indolent and the superstitious. Winston Churchill had the measure of them:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.”