|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The moderate Islamic terrorist state of Talibanastan (they must be moderate, after all we did a deal with them and we’re still negotiating with them) has explained that in its moderate approach to Islamic law, beating women is encouraged, but they draw the line at breaking bones.
Truly, Islamists in America have told us that Mohammed was the original feminist.
The Taliban has passed a law that allows men to beat their wives as long as it does not cause “broken bones or open wounds”.
The Telegraph obtained the 60-page penal code – signed by Hibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban supreme leader, and distributed to courts across Afghanistan – which classifies spousal beatings as “ta’zir” – discretionary punishment – rather than a criminal act.
A husband may strike his wife and children freely, provided the violence does not leave visible bone fractures or open wounds.
Even where serious injury can be proven, the maximum sentence is 15 days in prison.
Article 34 says that a woman who goes to her parents’ home without her husband’s permission – even to escape violence – faces up to three months in prison. Family members who shelter her face the same sentence.
The code explicitly distinguishes between “free” citizens and “slaves.”
This is Islam. Every last part of it grounded in the Koran, in the crimes of Mohammed and in Sharia Islamic law.
The Taliban aren’t doing anything extraordinary here. They’re just dropping the pretense maintained by some.
Since Islam is moderate, then beating women is moderate too. We can only condemn the extremists who beat women so hard that they break bones.
Much as Al Qaeda is now moderate because we support its takeover of Syria. We currently draw the line at ISIS (just not so much so that we didn’t let Syria’s Al Qaeda terrorists liberate ISIS terrorists and not so much so that we haven’t spread them around the world to ‘clean out’ the ISIS camps so the Turks could put down the Kurds) but eventually another even ‘purer’ Islamic movement will arise and we’ll acknowledge that ISIS is really moderate.
When we mainstream evil, it’s just a matter of sliding relativism scales. First it’s beating women, then it’s breaking their bones and then cutting their throats will prove to be moderate. Just as we went from negotiating with the PLO to negotiating with Hamas, to negotiating with the Taliban and Al Qaeda, we’ll negotiate with ISIS too. Once you get into bed with evil, there’s no bottom. It’s an endless fall down.
As PBS says, “It would be anachronistic to claim that Muhammad was a feminist in our modern sense. Yet the same present-day barriers to women’s equality prevailed in 7th century Arabia, and he opposed them. Because in his own lifetime Muhammad improved women’s position in society, many modern Muslims continue to value his example, which they cite when pressing for women’s rights.”
Apart from the legalized rape, beatings, and hijabs, Mohammed really did a lot for women. And his followers are doing a lot for women today.
“The rule of thumb”; I’m down with that.
So tragic that we are no longer taxed to support PBS making the case for Mohammed’s enlightened treatment of women.
Islam means turning back the clock to the days of the time they still behaved like backwards freakos
Turning back the clock to when there were no clocks.
Just Sundials and Hour Glass as well as slow burning candles and dripping water
They still do behave as backwards freakos.
They’re 10th century primitive who really want nothing to do with the modern world. I say we accommodate them by removing all the conveniences of the modern world. I.e., electricity, indoor plumbing, phone service, toilet paper, soap, medicine, etc., etc.
They’re ignorant primitive savages and probably wouldn’t miss any of it anyway.
Yes, the entire islamic world except Indonesia should be blockaded. They’re actually seventh century primitives, though.
The haven’t advanced much since then. I’ve worked in that part of the world and if you ask me by my reckoning (and since of smell) their only advancement is they actually bath now instead of just splashing water over their stinky parts.
Every time I would came back home from those countries, it took a few days for my sense of smell to return and I’m not BS’ing. It’s the truth!!
For those morons who call for an “islamic reformation”, this is what they are calling for.
What they mean, without knowing it, because they are morons, is that islam needs an Enlightenment, but that’s not going to happen because any influential muslim who tries to go down that path will end up very dead very fast.
Forget the Muslim world, that has always been stuck in a dark age of mysticism and theocracy. It is the West that is in dire need right now of a Second Renaissance and a Second Enlightenment.
The West is slowly collapsing back into another dark age of mysticism, unreason, and magical thinking.
What is transgenderism (the mystical claim that a woman can be born inside a man’s body) but unreason, irrationality, mysticism, and magical thinking?
THX 1138:
That’s a very astute observation! Bravo! Of course, you know the “magical thinking” types will attack you but so what? It’s what people afflicted with “magical thinking” do.
Islam Is too rigid and doctrinaire to be reformed. Any attempt to do so will cause the entire edifice to crumble.
And it’s written in black and white in the unholy koran that any attempt at reform merits a death sentence.
You forgot the korans weasel clause: taqqiya. Under this clause any hypocrisy or seeming betrayal of Islam is tolerated if it advances the Islamic agenda. Mamdani will support a far left economic AND social agenda, like homosexuality, trannyism, etc., if it keeps him in power. Hence, what seems written in Koranic stone…actually isn’t in so many respects.
And as always, the silence of the feminist community is deafening.
Reminds me of Don Vito Corleone instructing Pete Clemenza to find men who “won’t get carried away” when they beat up the goons that only got a suspended sentence for raping and beating he undertaker’s daughter!
For over 1400 years this has been among the abusive practices of Islam, but in spite of all that history it appears entirely too many people aren’t sure if they really mean it.
What will it take to convince them, televised beatings? Perhaps watching women getting stoned to death? I’m sure CNN or MSNBC would provide live commentary if they could get a paying sponsor.
I’m sure that CNN dipstick Christiane Amanpour would volunteer to do the live coverage.
I’d pay to see Christine Amanapour beaten and stoned.
Well, that should pacify the feminists
OK, no bones or skin broke, everything else is ok. And many here in the USA support this garbage. I guess throwing homosexuals off buildings is still allowed since the dude isn’t really muhamids wife. Toys are much more expendable.
This pedophile leader cult is the worst thing ever to happen to the world. Can anyone tell me of ANYTHING positive this cult has done for humanity in the past 500 years?
They’ve gotten their asses kicked by Israel in three wars but I can’t think anything else positive the cult of Mo-ham-mad has done.
The idiots in Minnesota and New York import this freak show where all these liberal women and homosexuals would be beaten or killed if they are left to sharia law. They throw gays off buildings and these same people support their own demise. What kind of psychosis are we talking of here?
No one actually cares about the real world effects of this kind of barbarism. What feminists, homosexuals and other leftists care about is their alienation from the world and inner discontent and whatever validation they can get—and Muslims are giving it to them.
The “rule of thumb” is enlightened and progressive.
There’s nothing more deadly for a civilized society than the lack of objectivity, clarity, and precision in the use of concepts. Obliterate concepts, and you obliterate thinking, obliterate thinking and you produce zombies ready for the whip.
And secondly, there can be no compromise on fundamental principles. Once you accept an immoral principle, just a tiny bit in this case “only”, you have accepted the immoral principle in full. The rest is only a matter of time.
He also said women had limited intelligence but Aisha wasn’t fooled like modern day bubble brains. She knew what the score was.
Yes, she had the score raped into her at age nine. She would’ve been terrible Karen material.
Pathetic. Not much else to be said.
Sorry Muhamed but here in America we don’t approve of wife beating and those who do it will end up in Jail. Have you by chance heard the one about the Burning Bed?
Ilhan Omar would approve, right? Oh, and of course so would all those deluded Pallywood women, and those queers for Palestine.
there’s a real difference between this sort of horrible brutality, which most people, left & right are against, and being against children being bombed. if we’re against muslim women and children being beaten (obviously) then we’re also obviously against them getting mass murdered.
Do you dream of little boys’ butts?
barbarians will do whatever their founding father tells them to do . his word is sacrosanct and cant be questioned . FGM is also required , barbarian husband and wife were taken to court in the u.s. for the practice . judge let them off quoting cultural norm . many barbarians in the u.s. have more than one wife and are living off the americans tax payer dime who rake in the benefits . americans are being taken for chumps and are being ripped off to the tune of millions . minnesota is a prime example . another barbarian commandment for them to despoil their host .
The Quran sent to me gratis by CAIR after 9-11 indicates scholars disagree about the permissibility of a man hitting his wife. The footnote to the passage include that some say the hitting is to only be “symbolic, as with a toothbrush.”
If I never post again, it is probably because I tried hitting my wife for the first time and used a toothbrush just to see how that would work out.
I’ll give the Muslims credit at least for thinking men should take care of women. No doubt they would think ill of some husband taken to court for not making the support payments.