|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
A wave of environmentalist bills set deadlines for so-called ‘renewables’, mostly useless and expensive solar and wind, by 2030 or 2035. Much like predictions of the end of the world or class papers, those deadlines seemed far away until they were suddenly right here.
The disastrous New York Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) calling for “70% renewable electricity by 2030” and “100% zero-emission electricity by 2040” seemed less crazy in 2019 than it does in 2026 when 2030 is just four years away.
Now New York Democrats are freaking out.
Gov. Hochul’s office release a memo showing that implementing CLCPA “would increase gasoline prices by $2.23 cents per gallon by 2031 and home heating fuel costs more than $3,000 annually for upstate families.”
Kind of hard to run on ‘affordability’ then.
The law’s “timetables are proving unachievable,” a statement from the Business Council of New York State, which represents large and small businesses, said in February. (The state is expected to be at least six years late in meeting its first target of a 40 percent decrease in emissions by 2030.) It is time to “pump the breaks” on the climate law, former Lt. Gov. Robert Duffy, a Democrat, wrote in a social media post.
Activists and many lawmakers remain committed to meeting the goals of the law, which calls for New York to get 70 percent of its electricity from renewable sources such as wind, solar and hydropower by 2030 and to shift entirely to carbon-free power a decade later. But they fear that Ms. Hochul is taking steps to amend the law, and that it could fall victim to the backroom dealings that are common in Albany.
There is no way for New York State to “get 70 percent of its electricity from renewable sources such as wind, solar and hydropower by 2030”.
It’s impossible. Period.
There are only two options
1. Black out half the state on a constant basis while sending prices soaring so high it may as well be the dark ages
2. Use the ‘carbon credit’ scam to buy wind or solar credits from other states. But this is not getting 70% of New York’s power from wind and solar. It’s paying other people somewhere else to do it and then buying their credits while continuing to use actual energy sources. And then raising prices on consumers to finance this rip-off to special interests.
Or there’s always option 3. which is modify the law and move the deadline. Something Dems want to do because they figure that raising prices this much might make them almost unpopular enough to lose an election.
State Senator Liz Krueger, a Democrat, said that the climate law was not to blame for rising energy costs. “That’s nonsense, and everyone knows it,” she said. Her office cited one report that said that households making less than $200,000 a year would benefit from a core program of the climate law, which charges polluters for exceeding emissions limits and uses the proceeds to invest in renewable projects and energy-efficiency initiatives.
Let me translate that from woke to English.
The ‘program’ will charge companies to finance more wind and solar which don’t provide reliable energy, but do provide money to special interests. Companies will then raise prices to cover the costs sending costs soaring.
“But last week, that idea was challenged when the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority sent a memo to Ms. Hochul saying that if the state began penalizing polluters, it could cause oil and gas prices for New Yorkers to increase by as much as $4,000 a year.”
It’s cause and effect. Raise costs for energy companies and they’ll raise prices for consumers. Unless you cap prices, at which point they close up shop.
Amending the law “will do nothing to address the state’s reliance on costly gas, which is the true driver of higher energy bills,” Liz Moran, a New York policy advocate at Earthjustice, a nonprofit group, said this week. The memo sent to the governor “is based entirely on contrived economic estimates” and “fails to account for policies like rebates or energy bill credits,” the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance, a nonprofit, said in a statement.
If you want really costly energy bills, try wind and solar. But if you want hot air, listen to special interests blather about “rebates” and “energy bill credits” that are coming out of the same pile of money that consumers pay. It’s like promising them that they will pay less because the companies will have to give them rebates… which the companies will pay for by raising prices.
How dumb do you have to be to fall for this one?
Anyway, if you think New York’s panic is something, remember it was early to the party and set an early deadline. A bunch of states have 2035 deadlines. That means they’re going to be freaking out in 2029.
Or a whole lot earlier if Republicans do their due diligence and explain how much families will be paying. And what looks like nationwide.

lol … good one Daniel 🙂
The math. physics, accounting or business case did not change form 4 or 5 years ago. It was undo-able then and it is undoable now.
They did a combinnation of not running the numbers at all or in suffivcient etail or fully intended to enforce inspiraiotnal/notional goals no mattter how much it financial hurt/beggared the people.
They fully intended to beggar the people, if they could get away with it that would make the peple needy and dependent n the government.
The only reason they are changing course is because it threatens their political viability. That is all.
It is not out a sense of what is right or feasible.
I’d bet the farm … the Climate Change Cartel fraudsters are far more familiar with scams, fraud, stealing, cocaine, kiddie porn, and other such sundry entertainments …
… than they are with science …
… especially thermodynamics and chemistry.
We live in a dystopian sci-fi where the Idiocracy (of Atheists Baby Killers – not Christian Trailer Trash)
… forces us to burn treasure, worship Gaia, and fund our enemies and domestic criminals.
To satisfy their lust for money,
and thirst for suffering and destruction.
Good point. Real science requires real research. Pseudo-scientists who can’t do research are phonies.
Basically, global warming comes down to solar flux and “optical depth”. Optical depth comes down to absorption spectrum of air molecules including water vapor. If the absorption spectrum of water is nearly the same as carbon dioxide, why the f*ck are they trying to zoom us all the time?
Acquisition of Power
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_absorption_by_water
Notice how quickly many billionaires, who supported AGW (global warming), said it is not a problem and that we can handle it after they decied they wanted and neeed the AI data centers. Just stunning!
Also, you can criticize climate models without knowing a thing about climate. You just have to know about models. Like how many random seeds do they have? If you use one random seed or the same string of random numbers for several variables, you can get them linked due to that flaw, when in reality they are not linked at all.
Most people pick a scientific shaman. They do not try at all to work it out themselves. Group think & secualr religion.
Professor Dan, thank you for reminding me why I do not choose to live in Californication, the state I was born and raised, lost my virginity and ultimately retired in and to stay clear of the state of NY until all this blows over or blows up then remade as Iran is blowing up to be remade, Gaza was blown to smithereens and is going to be remade.
Don’t expect Republicans to do anything other than waffle and hide under the desk.