Phil Haney Was Right; Barack Obama Is Wrong

Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.

In a recent article, Freedom Center contributor Lloyd Billingsley brought up the sinister backstory of the death of Philip Haney. Police and public officials at the time said it was a suicide, but other friends of his said that was unlikely. Haney had been a Dept. of Homeland Security official exposing Muslim terrorist infiltration and the suppression of that infiltration by the Obama administration which he had clearly encountered. Haney was found dead of a gunshot wound which was portrayed as self-inflicted; yet no one who knew Haney saw anything even resembling a suicidal personality before the shooting. Friends of his had been told by Haney that if he were to be found dead, it definitely would not have been from suicide. He knew he was in danger.

In his book See Something, Say Nothing, Haney revealed the coverup of the dangerous motives and goals of various Islamists which, if dealt with appropriately, might have prevented the Boston Marathon bombing, the San Bernardino massacre, and the Pulse nightclub shooting. These were carried out by various Islamic maniacs who were members of murderous organizations. But those organizations were being treated in a nonchalant/friendly manner by the Obama administration.

Haney saw clearly that there was an insidious attempt by government insiders to protect potentially dangerous Islamists – to enable their entry and presence in our country. He saw that members of murderous organizations in Pakistan and other places in the Muslim world were being allowed to enter and live in the USA. Yet, the threat they posed was whitewashed by the Obama administration. Higher officials, perhaps as high as the President of the United States himself, insisted on denying that certain dangerous individuals posed a danger to the U.S.

Haney clearly saw that the persons committing the above-noted massacres were connected with violent Islamic groups. If that connection had been clearly and honestly recognized instead of covered up/erased by pro-Islamic policymakers, the horrible deaths of the victims would certainly have been prevented. The evildoers who committed those massacres should never have been allowed into the country. Did Obama simply love the Islamic call to prayer, as he noted more than once without embarrassment? Or did he sympathize with the jihadist agenda as his reason for whitewashing the threats that Haney saw so clearly?

It is this writer’s view that Obama’s understanding of Islam, especially in contrast with Christianity, is so false and distorted as to lend itself to a whitewash of the dangers of Islam to both peace of mind and peace in society. His views amount to a whitewash of the Islamist goal to conquer “infidel” civilizations, especially Christian infidels, that it deals with every day in our global economy. His distorted ideas about the merits of Islam and Christianity are so extreme that they suggest a scaffolding of lies that lends itself to the cultural downfall of the West and of the U.S. if allowed to exist unopposed. His views were and remain so distorted as to actually invite the mayhem of the mass slayings noted in paragraph two of this article as well as the 9/11 attacks and other violent excesses that we saw against Americans in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Tanzania, Chattanooga, Fort Hood, and with the Washington DC sniper.

Here are some quotes from former President Obama regarding Christianity and Islam.

He has said, “We have Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, agnostics, Buddhists, and their own path to grace is one that we have to revere and respect as much as our own.” Do Muslims respect Christians as much as they respect fellow Muslims? Then why are non-Muslims expected to pay the jizya (tax) or die? Why are no churches allowed to be built in Saudi Arabia?

And why do “we” have to give all the above religions equal merit? Frankly, we do not. We can respect someone else’s right to be wrong, but tolerance does not mean that the individuals or groups being tolerated means that they are accepted as being just as “right” as we are. If a person tolerates someone’s “right” to be a vegetarian, that does not mean that that tolerant meat-eater believes that being a vegetarian is just as healthy and valid as being a meat-eater.

Therefore, based on tolerance alone, Christianity can still be and is superior to Islam. But because Islam wants to overtake and enslave Christians, it is incumbent upon Christians to resist the immigration of Islamics into their country – especially those who have arrived illegally. The fact that every single Muslim does not have the takeover mentality does not refute the legitimacy of concern about a takeover (because there is a sizable enough number that does want that). Their threat cannot be ignored, especially when we consider so many incidents of violence that have been perpetrated against Western civilization.

The clear purpose of too many Muslims is conquest and eradication of Christians. That has been manifest since the 7^th and 8^th centuries AD. And Islam attacked the West as recently as WWI when the Ottoman Empire joined forces with Germany and Austria-Hungary to attack other Europeans.

Barry the Great, who recently is stammering or speaking hesitantly in almost every public interview, also said, “In our household, the Bible, the Koran and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology.” This is again a completely superficial comparison implying the equal worth of these three because they are on the same shelf (did a former President really say this?). If I have a bottle of cyanide, a bottle of hydrochloric acid, and a bottle of orange juice sitting next to each other on a shelf in my kitchen, does that mean that any of those bottles are suitable to drink from at breakfast? Such an implication is frankly inane.

Lastly, our former President also said, “I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.” Perhaps he chose this reference to appeal to the many citizens who attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings and appeal to a “higher power.” But for Christians, Jesus Christ is not simply a higher power, but is THE higher power who saves our souls from death and eternal destruction. Perhaps our former President, like so many in today’s world, have the mindset Rodney King expressed when he said, “Why can’t we all just get along?” This question however is asked by those who are hopelessly uninformed, those who think that if we only try harder with our enemies, we really can get along.

Phil Haney knew he had offended those who wanted to whitewash the threat of Islamic aggression. He understood that you don’t invite the would-be burglar hanging around your yard into your house. His death remains suspicious to those who read his writing and appreciated his concern for the public’s safety. We can only hope and pray that his concerns will never be forgotten.