Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.

There are bad movies, and then there are fraudulent ones. Project Hail Mary belongs to the second category. It is not merely a weak film; it’s a synthetic hodgepodge imitation of a much better kind of movie, a prestige-packaged absurdity assembled from borrowed parts, emotional shortcuts, pseudo-scientific gibberish, and the desperate hope that modern audiences are now so starved for something resembling a real movie that they will mistake this for one. Apparently, they have been had.

The astonishing thing about Project Hail Mary is not that it is ridiculous, it is that it became a hit. That tells us something bleak not only about Hollywood, but about the audience itself. Standards have collapsed so far that a film can lurch from implausibility to implausibility, steal its most important effects and plot points from earlier and better science fiction films, and still be greeted as though it were some major cinematic achievements. What is presented as some unique cinematic experience is, in fact, nothing more than refried beans served up as fresh.

The film is, at bottom, a paste-up of other movies, a blender of better coherent and unique movies. Its lonely-man-in-space setup recalls, Silent Running, starring Bruce Dern, but without that film’s melancholy, eeriness, or moral strangeness. Its hibernation deaths evoke 2001: A Space Odyssey, but without its terrifying logic that gave them meaning there. In Kubrick’s film, the deaths of the sleeping astronauts are horrifying because they are murders committed by HAL, a machine whose intelligence has turned fatally against the human beings who had absolute trusted in it. There is motive, dread, and dramatic causality, and then a final reveal of the ultimate rational motive. In Project Hail Mary, the dead astronauts feel like borrowed furniture: the same image, stripped of the intelligence that once animated it. Two trained astronauts die in an induced coma, the least plausible man survives, the protagonist, and the film simply shrugs and moves on.

Its alien-contact material reaches for Arrival, but without that film’s rigor, mystery, or metaphysical weight. Arrival understands that communication with an alien intelligence should be one of the most difficult, uncanny, and transformative events imaginable. In Project Hail Mary, that obstacle is treated like a screenwriting chore to be disposed of as quickly as possible, descending into some kind of comic Vaudeville show. Before long, the human being and the alien are effectively chatting. The mystery, difficulty, and terror of first contact are replaced by cheerful palaver, as though the most unfathomable encounter in human history were merely another quirky buddy-movie setup in need of a few explanatory scenes.

And it keeps doing this, again and again, borrowing the shell of earlier science fiction while leaving behind the hard-won logic that made those films memorable. It wants the grandeur of 2001, the loneliness of Silent Running, the contact mechanics of Arrival, the competency fetish of The Martian, and the sentimental uplift of a contemporary crowd-pleaser, all at once. But it does not have the discipline to organize any of these elements into a coherent dramatic line. By the end, one feels not wonder, but lassitude. The film drains rather than compels.

Its biggest failure is that the mission itself never becomes clear enough to matter. What, exactly, is the protagonist sent to do? Does he accomplish it? Does he abandon it? Does the film itself know? By the final stretch, it becomes difficult to say whether he has fulfilled the mission, set it aside, or drifted into an entirely different movie, a futuristic version of The Truman Show or Slaughterhouse Five. He appears to put the central objective on hold in order to go careening through deep space after the alien for inexplicable reasons that the film treats as moving but never adequately explains. Feelings supplant reason and logic. A science-fiction adventure can survive many implausibility’s, but it can’t survive confusion about its own fundamental purpose. If a film does not know what its protagonist is trying to realize, it has lost its purpose and its way. In this case the film becomes truly lost in space.

That loss of spine is visible everywhere. There are so many gaping holes in Project Hail Mary you could drive a long-haired mastodon through them without even touching the sides. The protagonist is supposedly dragooned into the mission, yet appears to have a strangely curated wardrobe waiting for him on board: casual-cool shirts, sweaters, jackets, baseball caps, the whole Abercrombie-and-Fitch-in-space package. It sounds trivial until one realizes what it signifies. The movie is not building a coherent world. It is decorating a fantasy. My wife described it perfectly: an Abercrombie & Fitch model is kidnapped and forced to become a scientist and astronaut against his will.

And that, in fact, is not far from the truth of the character. The film never persuades us that this man would be chosen for such a mission in the first place. He does not seem meaningfully qualified, he certainly is begrudgingly resistant, and the story does almost nothing to earn his transformation into a crisis-capable deep-space operator. He tells us at one point that he “put the NOT in astronaut.” He is not convincingly an astronaut, yet suddenly he knows how to maneuver through lethal spacecraft emergencies, perform tasks under extreme conditions, spacewalk and do dangerous acrobatics, and handle situations that should require years of specialized training. Where did he learn any of this? The answer is obvious: nowhere. The screenplay simply bestows competence on him whenever it needs him to have it. That is the governing principle of the entire movie. It solves every hard problem by fiat: fiat authority, fiat competence, fiat emotion, fiat wonder.

Nothing reveals this more clearly than the mysterious East German Angela Merkel type woman, Eva Stratt, the figure who seemingly runs not only the mission, but Nasa and the entire world. She presides over the most important assignment in human history with the unchecked power of a dictator and almost none of the surrounding apparatus that would make such authority credible. She does not seem like the head of an international emergency effort, but rather a narrative shortcut: one severe, all-powerful bureaucratic figure invented so the screenplay can bark orders and push the hero where it needs him to go.

There is no plausible institutional world around her, no convincing sense of administration, oversight, colleagues, rival authorities, political pressure, or chain of command. A mission to save Earth should feel embedded in layers of power and responsibility. Instead, it feels like a school play staged in a bunker with an international cast of players from all corners of the globe with our protagonist being the only Caucasian male in the horde who is present as a reluctant incompetent. It’s a woke stew blended to the specific perceived zeitgeist ingredients of acceptable Hollywood dictates.

The structure only makes matters worse. The constant flashbacks do not deepen the story; they weaken it. Instead of building momentum, the film keeps stopping to explain itself, then wonders why the narrative never gathers force. Flashbacks should reveal something necessary, reorganize our understanding, or open a deeper emotional chamber. Here they feel like an editing strategy for disguising structural weakness – a plaster-of-Paris creation covering its own hollowness. The film cannot move forward cleanly, so it keeps darting backward, backfilling information it should have dramatized properly in the first place.

The protagonist, meanwhile, is a vacuum, a hollow man. The film takes the laziest possible route to loneliness, rather than giving him a textured human life and then stripping it away. It more or less drops him from the sky without meaningful attachments. No convincing family life, no substantial emotional history, no serious web of relationships. He is just alone. The screenplay clearly assumes this will make his cosmic isolation seem poignant, but loneliness has to be earned through contrast. If a character begins as an empty vessel, his solitude is not tragic; it is boilerplate schematic.

Even the soundtrack feels like part of the perpetual fraud. Too many contemporary films raid the music library of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s because it is easier to borrow emotion than to create it. When Scorsese uses music in Mean Streets or Goodfellas, it belongs to the world. Here, old pop songs feel imported, not organic. It is another form of theft: prepackaged emotional resonance dropped into a film that has not earned feeling on its own. By now, the whole thing has become a cliché: retro songs in space, left-behind playlists, nostalgia used as a substitute for dramatic invention.

The same artificiality governs the film’s broader imagination. Nothing feels discovered; everything feels administered. Its approved gestures toward contemporary virtue function less as world-building than as a kind of ideological shibboleth, a signal that the film knows the correct pieties and expects credit for displaying them. But science fiction should enlarge reality, not reduce it to approved signage.

That, finally, is what Project Hail Mary represents: not the rebirth of serious science fiction, but its dilution into science fantasy for a credulous age. Real science fiction, even at its most speculative, must earn belief. It must respect causality, scale, limitation, and consequence. This film does none of that. It is glossy nonsense in a lab coat. It flatters the audience with the illusion of intelligence while asking them to swallow one absurdity after another.

Compare it to 2001: A Space Odyssey, where everything has a dramatic reason for being there, where every image deepens the mood, every action alters the story, every element pushes us further into a terrifyingly coherent vision of man, machine, and cosmic mystery. Project Hail Mary does not propel anything. It stalls, detours, flashes back, borrows, manipulates, and finally dissolves into a blur of contrivance. It is a prestige production built on ludicrous premises, stretching credulity beyond the hypersphere.

The most unbelievable thing in Project Hail Mary is not the alien, the spaceship, or the science; it is that so many people have been fooled into accepting this pastiche of borrowed ideas and gaping absurdities as a triumph. It might more honestly have been titled: Project Incredulity.