|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.
A quiet surge is reshaping American courts in states such as Georgia and Missouri to prevent the encroach of Sharia law.
State legislators are advancing “American Laws for American Courts” (ALAC) and related measures. These laws attempt to keep the U.S. and state constitutions as the sole legal authorities. The message to Americans is clear: no foreign codes and no parallel tribunals. This effort addresses real risks in family law, contracts, child custody, arbitration, and other legal conflicts.
These laws are not instance of intolerance or fearmongering; Sharia principles have clashed with constitutional rights in our nation, and these laws will help prevent such clashes in the future.
The foundation for these laws was laid years ago. Since 2010, about a dozen states have enacted ALAC-style protections. These laws bar courts from enforcing foreign laws that violate American liberties.
Alabama’s 2014 constitutional amendment is a well-known example, but Arizona (2012), Kansas (2012), Louisiana (2010), North Carolina (2013), Oklahoma (2017), South Dakota (2017), Tennessee (2017), and Texas (2017) all followed a similar model.
These laws work to ensure that foreign legal codes—including religious ones like Sharia—cannot override due process, equal protection, or free speech. These laws were passed with bipartisan or supermajority support, often after testimony on honor-based violence, polygamy, or unequal inheritance issues.
While these laws began to be passed more than a decade ago, 2025–2026 marks a new acceleration. In Georgia, Republican State Senator Greg Dolezal introduced SB 486 on Feb. 10, 2026.
“Sharia law has no place in the United States, and it has no place in Georgia,” Dolezal declared. “Only American laws in American courts. No exceptions.”
The bill cleared the committee on Feb. 22 and explicitly prohibits any foreign law that conflicts with Georgia’s constitution. Dolezal, who is now running for lieutenant governor, frames it as a defense of Western civilization against parallel societies.
Missouri State Senator Nick Schroer introduced SB 977, the “No Foreign Laws Act,” which passed the Senate unanimously and now moves to the House. The bill prohibits the application or enforcement of any foreign legal code, including Sharia, if it conflicts with Missouri or U.S. law. Schroer’s rationale is sovereignty-based.
Arizona State Senator Janae Shamp, a Republican, pushed SB 1018 through the Senate in early March 2026. The measure explicitly adds Sharia law to the definition of prohibited foreign law. It tightens statutes against forced marriage, polygamy, and spousal abuse justified by religion. Shamp insists it is not about faith but about legal supremacy. She says that Sharia “in no way, shape, or form is compatible with the U.S. Constitution.”
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed HB 1471. It reinforces the state’s ban on foreign law and strengthens enforcement against groups promoting conflicting frameworks. In Texas, beyond the headline Proposition 10—which got 94.81% GOP support in March—State Rep. Brent Money launched the Sharia-Free Texas Caucus with Republicans. The caucus plans policy proposals for 2027 to counter “Islamization.”
This state-level momentum feeds national efforts. The bipartisan Sharia-Free America Caucus in Congress—now with dozens of members from more than 20 states—has advanced bills like the No Sharia Act (H.R. 5512) and the Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act (H.R. 5722). House Judiciary hearings in Feb. 2026 titled “Sharia-Free America” amplified the message: one legal system for all Americans.
To turn awareness into concrete commitments, national security expert Frank Gaffney has launched BanSharia.com, a public education initiative and resource hub. The site equips citizens with facts on Sharia supremacism, model legislation, and tools for direct engagement. Visitors are encouraged to ask their representatives and candidates to sign the Sharia-Free Pledge: “I pledge to the citizens of my district and the American people that I will oppose any and all efforts to impose sharia law on them.”
Gaffney’s campaign, featured in recent discussions with Lara Logan and at CPAC 2026, aims to build a nationwide movement of officeholders bound to defend constitutional supremacy.
Critics call the bills redundant or discriminatory. Supporters cite cases in Europe, including U.K. grooming gang reports, to show what they see as failures of prioritizing “cultural sensitivity” over justice. They warn of parallel societies and raise concerns about rights and free speech.
The wave is building because voters and lawmakers increasingly recognize the incompatibility of Sharia with U.S. law. From Dolezal in Georgia to Schroer in Missouri, Shamp in Arizona, and Money in Texas, red-state officials are refusing to repeat Europe’s mistakes. One nation, one law.
As more states join the firewall, the message to newcomers is unmistakable: America welcomes you—but only under American rules.
Photo credit: Matt57 at Wikimedia Commons (Public domain).
Laws are only as good as those who believe in them and defend them.
The problem is the Muslims breed like rabbits and Muslim immigration to America is still going on.
How long before there are more Muslims than Americans in America?
And while most Americans are not rabidly political, most Muslims are, quickly seeking public office and political power to transform every country they invade into a Sharia state.
Even now, when they are only 1% of the population, only 1%, they are everywhere seeking office and getting elected.
Ilhan Omar, Tlaib, and now Mamdani being the most conspicuous.
So when are you going to get off that fat ass of yours and do something about it. Intellectuals are great for telling others what to do.
So we have you telling someone else to “do something about it.” What is that “something”?
As for your comment about intellectuals, it is covered in detail in Thomas Sowell’s excellent book, Intellectuals and Society.
Thomas Sowell would be the guy who intelligently states that more people need to admit “I don’t know.”
When THX is right, he’s right! Those down-votes are likely knee-jerk reflexes from those who routinely oppose him on other topics.
who are you taking too?
have you gotten of your phat arse to do something about anything or just a yammering keyboard warrior cowering behind the cyber vail ?
Why be so insulting about it? Just ask if he has any idea what we, the people, can do about it. As long as we’re fighting with each other, NOTHING will get done.
Conquest by immigration and reproduction, this is how it happens, from Wikipedia —
“Known in the 20th century as a center of Polish-American life and culture, Hamtramck has attracted new immigrants in the 21st century, especially from Yemen, Bangladesh and Pakistan. In 2013, Hamtramck reportedly became the first Muslim-majority city in the U.S.[7][8] In 2015, Hamtramck became the first city to have a Muslim-majority city council in the history of the United States, with four of the six council members being Muslim. In 2022, Hamtramck became the first city with a fully Muslim city council. Mayor Ghalib’s post-election party was attended by men only, as segregation of the sexes remains traditional.”
A welcome response to those coming here with nefarious intentions of implementing Sharia laws. It’s simple, we are a republic based upon our Bill of Rights and Constitution. They want to live under Sharia law, they have numerous countries where that is their law; if they don’t like ours, they can go home!!!
I am so glad to know this is happening… thank you for this informative article.
For Americans to welcome those who adhere to Sharia principles is suicidal, not broad-minded. They should all be expelled before they constitute a sufficient presence to make real trouble.
‘Bout effing time. Maybe our feckless lawmakers are waking up.
Always nice to hear some good news.
Thirty-Eight states can call a Constitutional Convention.
Proposed: a rewrite of the First Amendment …
All religions are legal in the USA except Islam, which is banned.
… THEN ratify by 38 states: VOILE ~
An uplifling article. Perhaps all is not lost — as long as Democrats don’t get inside the room.
They already inside the room. I’m afraid is too little too latr.
Americans should be aware of those stealth jihad- minded Muslims who are living in America who attempt to have Sharia law enacted in this country., as observed in Texas.
Those facts that this is the United States, and has something that is far better than Sharia law. It’s the US Constitution. This is America, not Saudi Arabia or Iran.
As the former US President, Theodore Roosevelt, had well-spoken when he declared in a speech “There can be no fifty-fifty Americanism in this country. There is only room here for only hundred percent Americanism, only for those who are Americans and nothing else.”
Attempting to fuse together the United States Constitution with Sharia is just like trying to mix oil and water together.
all mooslimes should be tapped, tailed and monitored by the FBI and Homeland Security including that satanic fraud NYC mayor Moron MonDummy
If America is serious on stopping SHARIA. It should stop all Muslim immigration and deport every Muslim green card holder. It is that simple. Sadly a portion of American public want to destroy America from within by importing more and more Muslims.
That stealth jihadist scheme for achieving the advancement of Islam and its Sharia by the Muslim Brotherhoods members this is called the “stealth jihad” which is which by insidious infiltrate of the United States government both dangerously subversive to the US Constitution which those stealth jihadists in that that insidious Brotherhood” would want to replace the US Constitution with Islam’s Sharia
This as subtly effective and also is demonically clever in an Islamic sense. Furthermore, this, in some ways, is very similar to the instruction printed in the book entitled THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tzu. Which reads, “At first, then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening; afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to opposes you”
The subversive insidious stealth jihad for the advancement of the power in influence of Sharia in America continues< As observed in the specific of Texas, for its “Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on April 6th an investigation into a Dallas –based group accused of operating as a Sharia [Islamic law] court. In a statement, Paxton said he requested documents from the group, known as the Islamic Tribunal, regarding allegations that it was issuing ruling based on Sharia …. Paxton warned ‘Anyone or any entity that seeks to subvert the codified and federal laws of this country will be stopped.”
The article further informs its reader that Paxton explained “While the First Amendment allows religious organizations the right to govern themselves, it doesn’t allow areligious organization to act as a court, apply foreign laws that conflict with Texas or federal law, or issue ruling that imply to government authority.”
The cunning scheming seditious subversive stealth jihadists are, indeed very active in Texas as well as in other States across America. Therefore, all American patriots who believe that the United States Constitution should be the law of the land for the US and not Sharia need be aware and informed.
Source: The Epic Times, April 8-14. AB
No no no hell no. Muslims are not welcome to America to begin with. Once in, they will show their true color. Do not let them in,. Do not welcome them.
there is absolutely no point in building firewalls once the barbarians are inside the gates . judges and politicians have abdicated their responsibilities to protect their citizens . the democrats and rinos have facilitated americas demise and will continue to do so .
In support of religious freedom every Muslim in America should be given one mone to find any other religion of his choice or freely go back to the sand box they come from.
Confirmation to his new ‘faith’ will be celebrated at the Waffle House with a ‘bacon lovers’ BLT .
Given the legislative firewalls being built against foreign legal codes, how do we address offshore digital entities that seem to operate entirely outside our state regulations? I noticed sites like https://guiadenovibetcolumbia.com/ appearing in local searches, and it made me wonder—if these platforms are technically “independent” yet offer services that bypass our local oversight, could they be used as a backdoor for the very types of parallel financial or legal frameworks these new bills are trying to stop?