|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.
In our U.S. society, the Democommunists are quite content to reject the moral law and abuse the idea of “natural rights.” They have embraced the views of many leftist descendants of Karl Marx as well as the atheistic existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, the French communist philosopher. He managed to tie together communist political philosophy with radical ideas of individual freedom based on the importance of “becoming” [sic] de-coupled from centuries of philosophy where Being was the foundation for becoming.
In our society, tens of millions of people continue to see drag queens in libraries and classrooms as just good fun, and for the Dems those who object to the delightful gyrations and arrogant humor of the drag queens are people who lack a sense of humor. Democrats see millions of people crossing our Southern border as people with economic needs not unlike the millions who flooded in between 1890 and 1920, and that restrictions on their arrival are not only un-American, but inhumane or un-Christian. If we traditionally have been a country of refuge for those who are rejected – even though criminal types may be among them – then we must continue in that mode. Because the USA is compassionate, we admitted millions of Italians even though the Mafia and Sacco and Vanzetti were among them. We must be guided by the values expressed in Emma Lazarus’ poem on the Statue of Liberty, and not by the harsh, rejecting rhetoric of Trumpian callousness.
Chemical castration and hormone replacement in children is portrayed as “science” by the Dem perverts, and parents who object are simply behind the times and do not understand that science has expanded our freedom, which includes freedom to choose one’s gender. The Dems who support these procedures and the legitimacy of not having to notify parents believe gender transitioning is the price of progress. Freedom of choice cannot be undermined by ignorance and prejudice. If you are under 18 and want your breasts cut off or your male organ removed, it’s a dramatic choice, but the very drama of the decision reveals to the masses of Dem voters just how personal the choice is, and how no outsider – even a parent – can put themselves inside the mind of someone afflicted by gender conflicts. For them, it is the height of compassion to allow a young person to go ahead with gender change (really, sex change) decisions.
Despite Republican hysteria about the expansion of crime, riots, shootings and murders, and psychotic episodes by the homeless and deranged, the Dems see this as an affliction of society brought about by inherent American racism, and a competitive ethos that discards too many people as unworthy and ineffective. The homelessness and episodes of derangement that occur frequently in all our major cities are portrayed and understood by the Dems – especially those of the far left Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren communist wing of the Party – as representing a failure of our society, i.e., inherent contempt in America for poorer people, for people with maladjustments, and for non-white people who automatically feel and rightly feel alienated from the mores and requirements of so-called normal living in our society.
Strangely yet assuredly, the millions of Democommunist voters see the unraveling of the order and morality of hundreds of years of American life and thousands of years of Western Civilization as being democratic in that the so-called “unraveling” is not an unraveling, but an expansion of democracy that is resisted by entrenched out-of-date mindsets. For them, as a society we are trying to free ourselves from entrenched and rigid structures of family, government, identity, economic values, and outmoded ideas of freedom which allow for too much freedom to reject too many peoples who are deemed out of place – i.e., that allow for the rejection of non-white, non-straight, non-ambitious, non-male, non-female non-successful people. As they and all communists have since the Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, the Dems see themselves and portray themselves insistently and with a sense of the utmost moral superiority over conservatives (and especially conservatives like Trump who have a lion-like confidence) who are dismal reminders for them of an outmoded American, triumphal success ethos.
Lastly, the Democommunist agenda believing itself to be the advocate of true freedom of choice – not a freedom of choice limited by eternal or transcendent values – unlike their conservative opposition, rejects the pro-life position. President Trump is the only U.S. President to have spoken at a pro-life demonstration. For them, the pursuit of happiness in liberty is the crucial value in the Declaration of Independence, not life. They have allowed themselves to claim alliance with true freedom as the ultimate value.
In this, they follow the philosophy of the atheistic French leftist Jean-Paul Sartre for whom freedom of becoming was the ultimate value. He rejected Being itself as lacking in significance for living. Rather, writing in French, he advanced the ideal of becoming through freedom – the pour soi – as an ultimate value. Thus, being true to oneself, being authentic, is the highest attainment. If you are a pimp and embrace your pimphood wholeheartedly, then you have been the best you that you can be. There are no other moral considerations in play, no ideas of sin, no ideas of a higher spiritual or moral calling. The idea of fulfilling the demands of ultimate Being – the en soi – is too identified with the Christian roots of Western Civilization. The becoming he advances is innovative and future-oriented, and flies in the face of the overly restrictive moral and religious foundations of Western Civilization.
The idea of freedom from God and from moral constraints that follow from drawing near to a holy God is thus the underlying hellbent motive of today’s freedom-loving (sic), humanitarian (sic), and accepting (sic) Democommunists. The attempt to re-create freedom and right morality based on one’s own conceptions rather than on the conceptions revealed by God and accepted for thousands of years in our Judeo-Christian texts and history – the Biblical values that insist on the male-female identities, the sanctity of life, the wrongness of infant sacrifice, the wrongness of excessive compromises with people who do not share one’s moral and spiritual condition, and the importance of purity in youth, of respect for one’s parents, of not lying, of caring for others but not indulging the propensity to theft, murder, or assault in those others, and acknowledging the difference between morality and perversity, which is an eternal and essential distinction, is the key to successful living and a successful civilization. When Moses asked God who He was, God’s answer was “I AM WHO AM.” Today’s Democommunists think they can reply to this answer with a mocking voice filled with ridicule. I can hear them saying to Almighty God, “Yo dude, who d’ y’ think you are?!” Because of the blue offenses presented daily in our society, we can be sure that red wave or no, judgment draweth near.
Yes… and what we have… are the devout to the Island Boy… which many call a pedo…
Where Epstein literally killed babies to sell their bodies as delicacy… where Ellen DeGeneres was considered a Chef of this kind of market…
Eating babies… apparently Epstein was breeding and selling the flesh. All tied into the occult…
But did you know… Epstein Island had a dome shaped mosque looking building on the island… blue and white in color… which appears to be overlooking the ocean.
Of course there’s rumors of human graves on the island too…
…
At any rate… Nothing like the majority… of idiots in this world…
Vivid imagination. Citations?
Racklefratz…
The e-mails code words were “Pizza” and “Jerky”… mentioned some 900 times throughout them…
The source I got was titled… “SHOCKING New Files Show Codeword for EATING People”
Source… Valhalla Vft… on You tube…
Everyone should take a look at this. The documents presented could be construed that Epstein was running a ghoulish restaurant for cannibals, among his other crimes. Why is this not being reported? Where is Patel? Why are we protecting ANY of these peop[e?
Or this is all a grift to get eyeballs.
Everyone needs to expose themselves to this video to decide.
Thank you… Nate with Valhalla isn’t the only one that was reporting on this…
And… as we can see in the downvotes…
The American soul is decaying… either from denying and rejecting the evidence… or… those that did… just don’t care…
How shameful…
Way to rack up those down votes, loser boy.
All Democrats are enemies of the American people.
You are creating a straw-man argument by implying that atheism necessarily and inescapably leads to irrationalism, hedonism, communism, subjectivism, whim-worship, and nihilism.
And that Christianity necessarily and inescapably leads to peace and prosperity. Need I remind you of the brutal theocracy of abject poverty and stagnation that were the Christian Dark and Middle Ages? Need I remind you of the 300 years of bloody religious wars between Protestants and Catholics, and Protestants and Protestants, called the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation? These were intra-religious wars between the Christians over heresy and blasphemy, no different than what happens in Islam today.
The truth is that a person can be an atheist AND have rational values. A person can be an atheist and uphold the values of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Ayn Rand was an atheist and her secular philosophy, Objectivism, is a philosophy for living on earth and achieving rational values here on earth. It is a philosophy with a rational moral code.
“If I were to speak your kind of language, I would say that man’s only moral commandment is: Thou shalt think. But a “moral commandment” is a contradiction in terms. The moral is the chosen, not the forced; the understood, not the obeyed. The moral is the rational, and reason accepts no commandments.
My morality, the morality of reason, is contained in a single axiom: existence exists—and in a single choice: to live. The rest proceeds from these. To live, man must hold three things as the supreme and ruling values of his life: Reason—Purpose—Self-esteem. Reason, as his only tool of knowledge—Purpose, as his choice of the happiness which that tool must proceed to achieve—Self-esteem, as his inviolate certainty that his mind is competent to think and his person is worthy of happiness, which means: is worthy of living. These three values imply and require all of man’s virtues, and all his virtues pertain to the relation of existence and consciousness: rationality, independence, integrity, honesty, justice, productiveness, pride.
The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to enjoy yourself and live.” – Atlas Shrugged, John Galt’s Speech
Ayn Rand makes some good points, but salvation is God’s purpose for humanity since Jesus. “Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added.” Matthew 6:33
“All rights rest on the fact that man’s life is the moral standard. Rights are rights to the kinds of actions necessary for the preservation of human life. Just as “it is only the concept of ‘life’ that makes the concept of ‘value’ possible,” so it is only the requirements of man’s life that make morality, and thus the concept of “rights,” possible.
All rights rest on the fact that man survives by means of reason. Rights are rights to the actions necessary for the preservation of a rational being. Only an entity with a conceptual faculty has judgment on which to act, volition with which to select goals, and intelligence with which to create wealth.
All rights rest on the fact that man is a productive being. Rights presume that men can live together without anyone’s sacrifice. If man merely consumed objects provided in a static quantity by nature, every man would be a potential threat to every other. In such a case, the rule of life would have to be that which governs the lower species: seize what you can be before others get it, eat or be eaten, kill or be killed.
All rights rest on the ethics of egoism. Rights are an individual’s selfish possessions—his title to his life, his liberty, his property, the pursuit of his own happiness. Only a being who is an end in himself can claim a moral sanction to independent action. If man existed to serve an entity beyond himself, whether God or society, then he would not have rights, but only the duties of a servant.” – Objectivist philosopher Leonard Peikoff
Oh blah blah blah, for the one millionth time. More weak ass sauce from our beta boy philosopher and his ultimate beta boy helper, Lenny Piehole.
As a reminder, it was Judeo-Christian roots of Western Civilization that led to the creation of the Enlightenment, Age of Reason, concepts of freedom, justice, basic human rights and Western morals. All that is on the chopping block now due to the immoral Democommie atheists who have aligned themselves with the IslamoNazi anti-West civilization, historically a Fascist theocracy whose primary mission is to kill or subjugate infidels, including those Democommie useful idiot infidels.
“Classical” Liberals appreciate Western Civilization values and our American Constitution. They are now an endangered species. The Democrat Liberals have transformed into hideous creatures at odds with our common cultural morality, heritage and our Constitution. In other words they HATE Judeo-Christian Western Civilization as much as the Islamic Civilization hates us and wants to replace us.
Exactly! And that explains why Islam and the Dems get along so well, even though — on the surface, at least — it would seem they have absolutely nothing in common …
What they have in common is what they OPPOSE …
Yeah you self-worshipping soulless (in your estimation) atheist libertarians are quite something if not ignorant of why we are possessed of ego, as Rand found out. She was a dilettante when it comes to moral philosophy, spirituality and the relationships of such to psychological well being. And so was Nathaniel Brandon, her handsome narcissistic lover boy, her ‘student’. Both of these objectivists had no clue about Rand’s erupting ego which ’caused’ her to ban Brandon from her circle when a younger woman became his favored companion. Yeah these ignoramuses’ were free to do what they wanted all right, their spouses be damned. High moral examples for sure. Bandon’s psychological theorizing has been forgotten, of zero import.