|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
The Daily Mail calls her a “Latina firebrand” and claims that she is “desperate for attention.” The Independent is more restrained, contenting itself with calling her a “far-right MAGA congressional candidate” who, it says cattily, “has a history of posting violent stunts and using hateful rhetoric against Muslims, the LGBT+ community, Black people, and immigrants, in an attempt to gain notoriety to further a flailing attempt at a political career that has so far gone nowhere.” Clearly, the leftist propagandists of the establishment media want you to hate Valentina Gomez. And that in itself is a clear indication that she is on to something.
The Daily Mail hates her because she set fire to the Qur’an in what the paper, which reports superbly on jihad violence yet vilifies and demonizes everyone who proposes even the mildest resistance to that violence, calls a “vile stunt to ‘end Islam.’” And so the question immediately arises: if Valentina Gomez were a leftist activist who set fire to the Bible in order to protest against the leftist media’s pet chimera of “Christian nationalism,” would the Daily Mail call it a “vile stunt”?
The answer is clear. If Valentina Gomez had posted a video of herself burning the Bible, the same people who are calling her “far-right,” the media’s all-purpose and thoroughly content-free label for anyone it dislikes, and claiming that she is “desperate for attention” would be hailing her “courage” in “standing up to the hidebound right-wing Christian establishment” or some such.
As it is, however, the Daily Mail stated that Gomez was “courting controversy” by torching the Qur’an with a flamethrower while declaring: “America is a Christian nation, so those terrorist Muslims can *** to any of the 57 Muslim nations. There is only one true God, and that is the God of Israel.” The Mail, attempting to add even more to its indictment of Gomez, then informs its hapless readers that “earlier this year, Gomez barged on stage during a Muslim event at the Texas Capitol, and used the occasion to decry Islam as the ‘religion of rape, incest, and pedophilia, where they bow down to a stupid rock, and a false prophet.’”
Conspicuously lacking from the Daily Mail’s indignant and contemptuous hit piece on Gomez, however, is any refutation of her statements about Islam. We are told nothing to convince that Islam is not a religion of rape, incident, and pedophilia. The Daily Mail takes it as self-evident that Islam is none of those things, and that all right-thinking people know this. The distaste it obviously has for Valentina Gomez is a giant signal to its readers that they should regard her in the same way.
The Independent, meanwhile, wants you to know that decent folk are fighting back: “There has been a furious reaction to an anti-Islamic campaign ad posted by a far-right MAGA congressional candidate in which she sets fire to the Quran with a flamethrower.” She says she wants to “‘end Islam’ in the Lone Star State,” but this is ridiculous, you see, because “approximately one percent of Texas’s population is Muslim.”
And if that isn’t enough to convince you that Gomez is bad, the Independent adds the bit about “violent stunts” and “hateful rhetoric,” and even includes a sample of the latter: “‘Your daughters will be raped and your sons beheaded, unless we stop Islam once and for all,’ Gomez said before setting fire to a copy of the holy book.”
The Independent adds that “condemnation came quickly in response to the clip.” A person identified only as “podcaster Brian Allen” is quoted as saying: “This isn’t politics. It’s incitement. When the mosques start burning, remember: this was the match and the Texas GOP handed her the lighter.” Gomez did not, however, actually call for mosques to be burned, or for any kind of violence or illegal activity. Allen is employing the old leftist tactic of equating criticism with violence, which somehow never applies to leftists even when they call for violence outright against those whom they hate and fear.
In the avalanche of negative courage that Gomez received, however, for daring to burn the only religious text that leftists respect, not a single leftist “journalist” thought it newsworthy to ask her why she was burning the Qur’an, or to say even the smallest thing about why anyone might have any problem with the book.
No, instead, all we get is a monochromatic “Valentina Gomez is bad for burning the holy book,” with no curiosity whatsoever about what might be in it that could be problematic. Nor do any of the establishment media stories about Gomez say anything about jihad terrorism at all, or about the death threats from jihad groups for anyone who burns the Qur’an, which makes burning it a stand against violent intimidation and bullying. The less the public knows about all that, the easier it will be for establishment media propagandists to portray her as an evil fascist.
Gomez responded to the Daily Mail: “I am desperate to save girls from getting raped by muslims. You are desperate for clicks. I save lives while you cover up for these islamic terrorists. We are not the same.” Indeed.
The Daily mail should be concern on what going on its own country The UK not The USA. UK sold its soul to Islamist. supremacists. Americans would not allow the same in The USA. And that’s why Daily Mail is upset about.
I can’t argue with that.
Plus “ used the occasion to decry Islam as the ‘religion of rape, incest, and pedophilia,’
It’s certainly that in the UK.
At this point in time I’m all in favor of prohibiting Muslim immigration to the USA and the West.
But America was not supposed to be a Christian nation, a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, an atheist nation — or an anti-Christian nation, either. America was supposed to be a free country; that’s all.
Colombia where this woman was born is 90% Christian, so if she wants to live in a Christian nation, I suggest she move back there.
Wow government educated retards you should read a history book. The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to “free white person(s) … of good character”. This eliminated ambiguity on how to treat newcomers, given that free black people had been allowed citizenship at the state level in many states. In reading the Naturalization Act, the courts also associated whiteness with Christianity and thus excluded Muslim immigrants from citizenship until the decision Ex Parte Mohriez recognized citizenship for a Saudi Muslim man in 1944.
There should be no debate – islam is NOT compatible with Our Constitution and therefore should NOT be allowed to operate in Our Nation! But, if we went by THAT criteria then the DEMOcrats would be ousted too! Islam is an ideology – or theology – based on world dominance and oppression. Their very “bible” excuses, or DEMANDS, the dominance over “infidels” and requires their conversion or death! How can THAT be allowed to exist in the USA? Imagine if the DEMOcrats turned as insane and demanded the same? No, many muslims have been allowed to enter and look at the consequences – Minnesota muslims! It seems like every day there’s a new found crime involving the Somalis – why should Our Nation accept their criminality? Many other areas are also affected. Maybe the plan is to clean Our Government of criminals/communists and then get to work on the “immigrants” who don’t belong here! Hope so!
And the Founders permitted slavery to continue under the Constitution, so by your argument the USA was designed to be a nation of white, Christian, slavery.
Women were not allowed to vote, so they still shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
This is why CONSERVATISM is so goddamn STUPID!
There were and still are fatal flaws in the Constitution. The Founders gave us the beginning of a historical experiment in liberty, not the perfect final words on liberty.
“The clause giving Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce is one of the major errors in the Constitution. That clause, more than any other, was the crack in the Constitution’s foundation, the entering wedge of statism, which permitted the gradual establishment of the welfare state. But I would venture to say that the framers of the Constitution could not have conceived of what that clause has now become. If, in writing it, one of their goals was to facilitate the flow of trade and prevent the establishment of trade barriers among the states, that clause has reached the opposite destination.” – Ayn Rand
are you a private school educated retard or public school educated retard – are you reflecting upon yourself and your own shortcomings –
I’m not bothering to look up the Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) – because we now live in 2025 – and in the USAs history we’ve had a Civil War to make the 13th Amendment and in my lifetime, the Civil Rights movement from the 1950’s into the 1960’s,
Muslims have become a problem since jihad was let loose on the world, in the USA 9/11/2001 and in Israel 10/7/2023 – there is now mistrust of muslims , their real intent. Are they as peaceful and just want a better life in the American dream or are they Manchurian Candidates awaiting the call?
Ignorant, America was founded as a Christian nation. Read a book.
And America was founded as a Slavery Nation, it took the Civil War to get rid of slavery.
It’s time to discredit the irrationality and stupidity of Christianity as well.
Christianity is what drove abolishon of slavery.
There are many verses in the Bible defending and encouraging slavery. Pro-slavery Americans used those verses to defend slavery.
But you’ll probably argue that those Christians were not true Christians that they were misinterpreting, perverting, HIJACKING Holy Scripture. Well then, Christians killed and slaughtered each other for centuries over who was a true Christian and who was a HERETIC, who had the correct exegesis and who had the wrong exegesis. Catholic killed Protestant, and vice versa, and Protestant killed Protestant over interpretation.
Something so crucial as whether slavery is a good thing or an evil cannot be settled by an appeal to something so inconsistent and contradictory as the Bible.
The defense of individual liberty requires a rational, logical, SECULAR, observation and evidence based argument. not something so ridiculous as “Slavery is wrong because I happen to INTERPRET Holy Scripture as condemning slavery and you INTERPRET Holy Scripture as defending and encouraging slavery but my interpretation is the correct interpretation simply because it’s my interpretation”.
Christianity is what drove the end of slavery in the UK without firing one shot. In the US it was abolitionism purpose to end slavery. The only thing it ended were the lives of over 1.5 million people. Resulting in the termination of the constitutional republic and the beginning of the federal empire, causing the slave count to go from 3 million to 40 million.
America was not founded as a slavery nation. Just how stupid are you? You can’t back up a lie that dumb.
Thank you, Robert Spencer, for his article, in which you nail why this lady from Colombia definitely hits a nerve with the Antisemitic, Anti-American, Hamas-supporting Left. Also, I whole-heartedly agree with THX, that it is about time, we discredit the irrationality and stupidity of – I would say – every religion! As citizens of the United States, we have individual freedom, yet, we haven’t acquired the way of dealing with our language, which accurately expresses our individualism. Although America and other democratic societies have given the individual the freedom, to move away from our historical group-behavior, this isn’t reflected in the way we deal with our language. Simply stated, Disembodied Language (DL) – in which we as speakers, don’t listen to ourselves and in which listening to others or making others listen to us, is considered to be more important, than listening to ourselves – has continued unaddressed and, therefore, unabated, in all free Western societies. Embodied Language (EL), in which we, as speakers, listen to ourselves while we speak, is the only language of our individual freedom, in we accurately express our Individually Lived Experience (ILE).
I hope to talk with each of you, after you have, in 2025, determined, for yourself – by talking out loud – alone, that there is, of course, a great difference between talking, in which you listen to yourself (EL) and talking, in which you don’t listen to yourself (DL). This discrimination process has never occurred and that is why we all, per default, engage in DL. If we, on our own (N=1), acknowledge the difference between DL and EL, we find, to our great relief and amazement, that we actually always wanted to have EL and, therefore, we begin to do whatever it takes, to stop our tendency to have DL, so that we can have EL, because DL and EL are binary or mutually exclusive. Once we can have, on our own EL, by talking out loud with ourselves and by listening to ourselves, we are able to say and, therefore, get clear, on many things, we were never clear on with our usual, habitual DL. For instance, we begin to recognize that all language is, was and will always be, an overt phenomenon, that is, our language is always spoken, heard, written or read, but there exists no mind, inner dialogue in our head, as that was a byproduct (IIL) of DL.
If you do as I ask you, in 2025 and get in touch with me in 2026, we will be able to have ongoing EL together and share our Language Enlightenment (LE), which simply means, we are finally truly ourselves, because we use our language correctly. Our ongoing EL is the expression of our LE, which illustrates that all religion or spirituality was based on our DL and our IIL and is no longer relevant. Moreover, the future of mankind is, of course, genuine individualism based on our EL and not the conflicted, problematic, incoherent, crazy so-called individualism with DL.
How many pints of Ben & Jerry Ice Crean have you had this summer Rosebud?
Man, you really hate this country, don’t you?
“It’s time to discredit the irrationality and stupidity of Christianity as well.” I don’t exactly seeing the West discrediting your favorite hatred. But the Leftists and Muslims do seem sympathetic to your obsessions.
So who was it that got rid of slavery? The anti-slavery fairies?
The Christian Churches of the North had a very large hand in the fight against slavery.
Read “The Worst of Indignities: The Catholic Church on Slavery.” by Paul Kengor, unlike you, an actual historical scholar. He has published books, also unlike you.
Please continue being a loser. I’ll never run out of material to smear you with
Only democrat states had slavery, and a tiny percentage of dems owned slaves.
“At this point in time I’m all in favor of prohibiting Muslim immigration to the USA and the West.”
So I guess that last week you were all in favor of letting Mooslimes worm their way in. What changed you T? Was it Muslims flying those planes into the Twin Towers. Or when they shot up night clubs and Christmas parties. Or when they make zombie style fools of themselves in public office like Trashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar always do. I guess when it may affect you directly because Mammi Dammi may get elected mayor in NYC, you finally wake up and smell the “Kafir”. You definitely deserve a P.O.S. like Zohran f**king up y0ur city
I always felt that you really didn’t care what happens in this country because we just aren’t sufficiently Objectivist enough……the standard excuse to do nothing and whine and complain.
To that I say thank God. We are a Christian nation. If you don’t like it you should take your own advice. I suggest you move to Mooslimistan. Just think how faux sophisticato you can be while eating halal food.
Speaking as a proud MAGA Jew…America was founded by Christians and although we have separation of church and state, I am much safer under our elected Christian leaders than I am under any elected Jewish leaders who are overwhelmingly leftists. And god save us all from elected muslims like Omar, Tlaib and soon to be Mamdani.
America was founded by Deists and nominal Christians in the Age of Enlightenment, no previous era could have produced the Bill of Rights and a separation of Church and State.
The USA could never have been founded by the Puritans a century before. The Puritans were SERIOUS about Christianity and understood perfectly well that Christianity demands a THEOCRACY, not individual liberty.
You are such a loser, still spouting the silly lies Mommy Anus told you.
Maybe you should try going to https://wallbuilders.com/resource/the-founding-fathers-on-jesus-christianity-and-the-bible and read the actual words the Founders wrote instead of the second hand nonsense by Anus Randy and Lenny the Piehole.
But you won’t. You are probably too scared to read a little truth into your pathetic life.
Sucks to be you as always.
First, start with our Declaration of Independence.
You need to read the founding documents of our nation because you are once again speaking without knowledge and as a dutiful “objectivist” being irrational in yet another attempt to vilify both Judaism and Christianity.
Excerpted from The Declaration of Independence:
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
The Creator is G-d Almighty and much of what became the laws of our land were cultivated from the 5th book of the Jewish Torah called Deuteronomy.
You don’t understand Islam. You will shortly when Europe goes up in flames.
Totally agree. They are not there to assimilate but to take over, have shariah law to replace all civil laws and to fly some version of crescent flag as part of the flags over the capitals of europe.
Silly me. I thought that in a free country people were supposed to be able to practice their religion, or none at all, as long as they don’t violate the negative rights of other citizens. Tell us about the religiosity of the people who signed that Declaration of Independence. If you seriously believe their concept of freedom included no religion, I have a question for you: where did you buy that LSD?
Why it’s Aisha I’m Six, our front for Sebastion when he goes too far off the rails and gets temporarily cancelled. Would that it were permanent.
I always love your faux indignity and your silly childish irrelevant questions. Maybe you should tell us about your religiosity in general.
Guess I missed the part where she said she wanted all America to be a Christian nation.
rock man, sky daddy, stick boy, it’s all semantics for the barbarians to kill each other over.
you all fight and kill each other over the same person, in different disguises who is not even real.
god is ai you are a simulation
Incredibly ignorant and uneducated comment.
Man did not create man. Prove me wrong. I’ll wait.
I saw her handle that mini flame thrower. Capable gal. And has the correct enemies, to boot. Nice looking; so, definitely not Democrat material.
Carrying a torch?
If she wants to burn a Koran then she should also burn copies of The Communists Manifesto, Das Kapital, by Karl K Marx Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin, Assault on Reason by Al Gore
Ah…good point …. you should send that idea into her campaign committee
She has a nice rack. A pretty face, too.
Good enough for me.
She’s not black. She’s a WHITE Colombian from Medellin. Most Paisas from Medellin are full-blooded Spanish creoles and ridiculously proud of it.
Who said she was black? And Colombian chicks have a reputation of being attractive and hot tempered. To men of the world like me.
I checked out her campaign website. She’s incredibly cool and even has a video of her shooting an automatic rifle. Maybe at some illegal aliens, heh? Every political and social position she has is Magariffic.
She has marked herself. She better watch her six.
You say that about AOC – but at least this one seems to be MAGA and to me MAGA women are the hottest because of what’s inside comes out –
I see we have 25 titty hating weirdos here. I’m proudly attracted to pretty chicks. And tits. You people are freaks.
Naw,we’re just against the vulgarity that is being normalized in our country. Have some class.
Read the Qur’an and you will learn that Islam requires the DEATH of non-believers. If the non-believer is female, RAPE after RAPE after RAPE will be their REWARD. EVIDENCE PROVES THAT’S WHAT THEY DO!!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
On Oct 7th, the “religion-of-peace” took rape further.
Something pure evil was put on camera. (As they were proud of it, they recorded their attacks of their own free will.)
47 minutes of brutality in all. One portion shows a muslim scumbag stabbing a young woman in the side while raping her until he was humping a lifeless corpse.
Grifter Thunberg didn’t trouble herself to see any of the depraved footage. (It apparently doesn’t fit her definition of “war crimes”.)
Burn a Bible though……….Meh.
This chick is nuts, but in a good way. “Don’t be weak and gay” is a great slogan.
“Valentina Gomez is bad for burning the unholy book.”
Yeah, bad ass. How many chicks have a personal flame thrower? I want one of those. And she has an illustration of a rifle on her shirt, combat fatigue pants and desert boots. She looks like she’s ready to kick islamopithecine ass and crispy fry it. I wouldn’t want to piss her off.
I wonder if she’s single?
I have one used only twice – you can use it to light your 70 year old crac ho’s pipe from across the room – then you can come up with flame throwing performance art –
Get on one of those Simon talent shows – if they don’t give you the golden buzzer – burn the whole place down –
A moment of passing madness –
Valentina Gomez is singe.
😛 Maybe she’d go for a retired old man? She could double as my bodyguard when we have our clothes on.
Your single? Who’s the friend in your photo?
So, some punk named Brian Allen is lamenting a burned Quran will lead to burned mosques.
1000s of Christian churches have been torched, and I’d wager Allen can’t even name one.
To be fair, the establishment media have never covered it, so even I have trouble naming any of those churches, except one – Notre Dame cathedral.
A muslim woman parked a car-bomb in front the day before the fire, but it failed to detonate.
So the religion-of-peace went with Plan B.
Gotta have that flame thrower! Where can I get one?
I’m assuming this young lady immigrant is sincere and fed up and as a naturalized citizen knows MAGA is the only way we can survive will win in a landslide in Texas.
And what she did takes guts.
Enough of the islamophobia – yes, we are afraid of what myzzlymz will do – we have seen only the worst kind of demonic satanic vile violence from them
OOH! Where can I send her a campaign contribution?
She has a camping website. It’s under her name and easy to find. I read the whole thing but I’ll leave the donations to you. I’m retired and poor.
Koran, Sura 9 verse 5 “So when the forbidden months are passed, so kill the polytheists wherever you find them, and take them as captives and besiege them and lay wait for them with every kind of ambush” They will always say that’s an “interpretation, not a translation, because nobody can translate the Koran from their pure arabic.
“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who became infidels. So strike their necks and chop off every fingers of them.” Sura8: verse 12.
“And Allah is the best deceiver.” Sura 8, verse 30. (The best deceiver is actually Satan.)
It goes on and on. Islam is incompatible with our Constitution, and with civilization. No adherent Muslim should be admitted to the USA.
You can thank the aultruistic motives of those who rule over us.
May God bless and protect Valentina!
I deeply respect and admire this girl,’s courage, and hugely support her values, but I’m concerned about her security. She seems to be alone, standing up against the most wicked, immoral, violent and dangerous “religion”–really an ideology–in human history, 2 billion strong. Many, or at least some, others need to join her, especially men, and preferably at least one security professional. She needs to be armed, and ready for combat. These animals don’t f**k around.
But then you never really know when something small will turn into a social contagion, or even a revolutionary movement. MAGA did.
This is genuinely helpful. 馃檪 Your explanation cleared up my confusion.!