|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
[Subscribe to Naomi’s Substack: HERE.]
Is there something about liberal elite networks, you should understand?
Half the country is up in arms about President Donald Trump’s inexplicable decision to mock his base, because many are appalled that Attorney General Pam Bondi seems to be orchestrating a coverup of a serial rapist of children. Bondi’s Justice Department released a memo last week: “The two-page document said the department found no evidence of an Epstein client list and that no additional files from the investigation would be made public.”
President Trump’s response to all this has been startling: He stated that “[O]nly really bad people […] want to keep something like this going.” According to NBC, he also called MAGA supporters of his who are upset at AG Bondi, “weaklings” who “bought into this bull—-t” —.
President Trump’s supporters, including Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and even Alex Jones, are furious, and calling for full release of the “Epstein files.” Polls show harm to his support: numbers that could threaten Republicans in the midterms.
Democrats are racing to capitalize on the fissures opening among Republicans, as Politico reports. President Trump’s appeal to his base is that he is “one of us”, and that he promises transparency. A situation that casts him as a rich guy with muddy motivations protecting another late rich guy’s friends — the dead man, the worst of the worst — could lose him the base, and cause MAHA voters – millions of them moms and dads of girls like the ones that Epstein abused — to flee.
Conservatives are baffled. My husband, a truly objective man (as well as an ardent President Trump supporter who also worked for numerous intelligence agencies for almost three decades), is puzzled, to the point of wondering if the President is acting uncharacteristically in response to some serious unnamed threat (or threats), perceived or actual.
Because I spent decades in the same elite liberal circles that sheltered Epstein, I am not puzzled. I think I understand the matrix of this situation.
It has, in my view, to do with “the network.”
I think that it is likely that multiple people who are critical to this administration’s success — my guess is, that these are mostly guys from the Silicon Valley community, who have been the ones to put the fuel of their billions and their technical and media support into President Trump’s campaign and administration’s engines — whether they are innocent or guilty, are in the Epstein files. (Remember why Mrs Gates broke up with Mr Gates?) And I think this nation’s most important scientists, innocent or guilty, are in the files. And my guess is that the funders have confronted President Trump.
Why do I think this? There are several clues.
One is the interview of the late Epstein’s former lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, with Chris Cuomo. Remember, Dershowitz used to represent President Trump as well. Dershowitz confirmed that there is a redacted list of people accused of improper conduct, stressed that no one who is a public figure who is in office currently (you get it) is on the list, and called on AG Pam Bondi to ask the New York Courts, who have custody of this list, to release it.
If you read the hieroglyphics here correctly, what you should see (this is why it is useful to have been a political consultant; you can read the code, which often involves triangulation or “deniability”) that A/ President Trump is not on this list. B/ President Trump does not wish the horrific baggage of being the one to infuriate all the powerful people who are on this list, by releasing it himself via his AG. C/ They — the Trump administration — want it released by others, ie, the New York courts, so that they themselves don’t receive the appalling blowback.
I also believe that there are make-or-break tech bro Trump supporters on the list, because of a moving interview given by Eric Weinstein on July 14, 2025— interestingly, in the midst of the Bondi furor — to Steven Bartlett, on the “Diary of a CEO” podcast.
Weinstein was til 2022 managing director for the American venture capital firm Thiel Capital. Weinstein is a compelling intellectual, in addition having served at the very top of one of Silicon Valley’s key organizations. He created a physics-based “theory of everything” that he brought to a fellowship at the Mathematical Institute at Oxford, and he was trained in mathematics at Harvard University.
On the podcast, he stated that “[s]ex offender Jeffrey Epstein was a “product of one or more elements of the intelligence community.” Weinstein, who said he had met Epstein, described him as “certainly was not a financier in any standard sense. That was a cover story.”‘
“British entrepreneur Bartlett asks about Weinstein having met Epstein, and he says, “He wasn’t a financier the day I met him.” Weinstein goes on to describe Epstein as a “weird guy,” who “didn’t seem to know a lot about currency trading.”
Weinstein also describes Epstein as a “construct”‘.
This interview has been seen by 2.4 million people. It is riveting. I felt a deep sense of recognition when Weinstein was speaking. My sense is that Weinstein was speaking extremely carefully; that his goal, among others, was to establish that one could be enmeshed in documentation around the Epstein community and “lists”, without being a pedophile — indeed, one could be enmeshed in those documents simply for being a cutting-edge scientist; and that one intention of his was to put this situation on the record.
I know that Weinstein is correct; “the list/s” will have pedophiles on them, and they will have innocent men (and women) who are snapshotted forever in the vicinity of Epstein – even at his New Mexico ranch and yes, even on his island — simply because they had the misfortune to be some of the most important scientists and mathematicians — and technologists — of our time.
Weinstein argues that the Epstein “construct” was what the military calls “dual use” –that is, that Epstein had multiple missions running concurrently.
One mission, of course, was that of running a grotesque sexual honeypot, exploiting minors, for purposes of blackmail.
But another, Weinstein argues, is the management and direction of Western science itself. Weinstein notes that Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, the late publishing magnate/reputed intelligence asset Robert Maxwell, founded the scientific imprint Pergamon Press, the Oxford-based imprint that published medical books and journals, which was bought by Elsevier, which is the main scientific publishing imprint (and the advance guard scientifically for the COVID/vaccine narrative; indeed, Elsevier created a “resource hub” about COVID for “librarians, campuses and health professionals”, an oddly activist offering from what is supposed to be a neutral scientific platform).
Weinstein notes that Epstein funded a number of important scientists, and that he had an office at Harvard. Weinstein says in the podcast, with what looks like suppressed rage, that he wants to know why Epstein was aware of his, Weinstein’s, work, and why Epstein was embedded in the Harvard mathematics department.
Harvard Mathematics Department:
Indeed, Harvard was an avid matchmaker for Epstein among the scientific and mathematics community. Harvard accepted about $9 million from Jeffery Epstein, and gave him an office in the institute that he helped to fund. Epstein visited Harvard more than 40 times.
Key Harvard academics were brought to him by connectors in the university, and encouraged to socialize with him. “Some [Harvard] professors beyond [mathematics professor Martin Nowak] appear to have enjoyed close ties with Epstein, the [Harvard] review found. The report says “a number” of faculty members visited Epstein at his homes in New York, Florida, New Mexico and the Virgin Islands. [Italics mine]. Some said they visited him in jail or took trips on his planes. The visits were done in a personal capacity, the report said, and do not appear to violate Harvard rules.”
So: systematically, consistently, major intellectuals, especially in the fields of computation, genetics, evolutionary biology, and consciousness, were being herded by gatekeepers into proximity to Epstein, who had been planted physically in their midst; and these academics were urged to accept his funding money and to meet with him and by implication, to befriend him or to accept his friendship, and even his invitations. I think this is the “Why?” that Weinstein is asking. We will return to the implications of this systematic engagement structure, later.
Eric Weinstein is correct. Jeffrey Epstein did fund cutting-edge scientists and mathematicians, especially in the fields of genetics and and evolutionary biology. He even convened them via another entity, into a community under his funding structure.
Weinstein’s larger claim — that the Maxwell/Epstein nexus or “construct” served not just to fund but to direct and manage and gate-keep and put a frame around and essentially set the direction of science — is a claim that makes sense, from what I know.
I know that Weinstein is right because I was unknowingly part of a network that overlapped with a part of this network. My agent for almost all of my career, since I was “discovered” by him and since he helped me to publish my first book, The Beauty Myth, a bestseller, at the age of 26, was the legendary literary agent John Brockman. Brockman became as famous as his famous stable of intellectuals, especially during the 2000s and 2010s, for promoting something he called “The Third Culture,” an intersection between the humanities, technology and the sciences.
Brockman’s roster of writers had no mass market novelists, no thriller writers, no cookbook writers, no popular historians. It was, in retrospect, a remarkably curated list. I was honored to join it. Brockman Inc primarily represented the very pinnacle of science and science-adjacent writers: evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, cognitive scientist Daniel Dennet, psychologist Daniel Kahneman. “Nimble Deal-Maker for the Stars of Science” reads a gushing New York Times profile of John Brockman.
Jeffrey Epstein funded the Edge Foundation, Brockman’s digital and irl salon. No one knew this. Or, at least, no one I knew, knew this.
This entity held gatherings of these intellectuals, and published a website and books in which they were asked critical questions (the website is still up). Edge.org’s website hosts commentary by the best of the best — the minds that are directing our culture and our science: theoretical physicist Murray Gell-Mann, cultural anthropologist Mary Catherine Bateson, Gnostic Gospel scholar Elaine Pagels, theoretical physicist Freeman Dyson, Google co-founder Larry Page.
Its motto is: “To arrive at the edge of the world’s knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves.”
Edge.org hosted “millionaire’s dinners”, which later became “billionaires’ dinners”; these brought the elite of the world of science together with the elites of Silicon Valley. Edge.org also published commentary by some of the most influential intellectuals in the world — men (mostly men) from both of those worlds, in dialogue. (Evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein and Eric Weinstein both contributed to Edge.org, and in 2018 Eric Weinstein thanked Brockman in a tweet, for the opportunity to speak “as me”.)
I will just lift out the sections from Wikipedia that explain the basics of the Epstein link with Brockman Inc, as I do not wish to locate myself in the cross-hairs of any new reporting for this dangerous story:
“In an interview with Prince Andrew dated November 17, 2019, BBC reporter Emily Maitlis mentioned that both Andrew and John Brockman attended an intimate dinner at child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion to celebrate Epstein’s release from prison for charges which stemmed from at least one decade of child sex trafficking.[7]
Andrew’s presence at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan mansion was corroborated by Brockman himself, in emails published in an October 2019 New Republic report. The story suggested that Brockman was the “intellectual enabler” of Jeffrey Epstein, the financier who died in August 2019 while again awaiting trial on charges related to sex trafficking.[8]
Brockman’s famous literary dinners—held during the TED Conference—were, for a number of years after Epstein’s conviction, almost entirely funded by Epstein as documented in his annual tax filings.” This allowed Epstein to mingle with scientists, startup icons and tech billionaires [Italics mine].”
In 2009, Jeffrey Epstein was released from prison.
By 2010, Brockman’s community of intellectuals went far beyond the scruffy if distinguished Harvard professors of the early 2000s. By that year and then throughout the teens, Brockman’s Edge Foundation, via the “Billionaire’s Dinners”, somehow convened the leaders, indeed the emperors and empresses, of the tech world.
Here, in one improbable room, in 2010, were Amazon founder Jeff Bezos; Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington; Marissa Mayer, then at Google; Larry Page, who cofounded Google; Craig Venter, who sequenced the human genome; biologist George Church, who later had to apologize for accepting funding from Jeffrey Epstein; weirdly, PCR test inventor Kari Mullis; weirdly, The Simpsons creator Matt Groening; and Nathan Myhrvold, formerly CTO at Microsoft and founder of Intellectual Ventures, the Tech Brotherhood’s Ground Zero of venture funding; Susan Wojcicki, later CEO of Youtube; Jason Calacanis, the tech investor who turned, per his book, $100,000 into $100,000,000; and Michael Tshao, who eventually led Apple’s foray into electronics such as the IPad.
And that is just one single year. The star-studded tech and scientific names march on through the subsequent decade: cofounder of Google Sergey Brin; cofounder of Microsoft Paul Allen; Tony Fadell, “Father of the IPod”.
In 2019, the news broke that Epstein funded Edge.org. Buzzfeed and other news outlets ran stories.
I immediately broke up with my career-long representation, and wrote a heartbroken letter to John Brockman and his wife and colleague Katinka Matson; heartbroken because I had actually loved them, and because I had trusted them with my development as a writer, which task they had managed brilliantly for decades, and heartbroken too because I was a survivor of child rape myself.
After I left, I had a lot of conversations with Brockman’s other clients. They called me — I did not call them.
To a man (and they were all men) these distinguished intellectuals explained that they empathized with my views and shared my indignation about Epstein’s misdeeds, but that they were not going to leave Brockman Inc.
I guess what I am trying to explain is the power and endurance, and really, the sanctity, of “the network” in the worlds of the elite.
Even with the news breaking that the agency’s cultural activities were funded by a pedophile, Brockman’s other clients rightly calculated that their staying within the shelter of such a powerful network, would be more beneficial to them, than would be leaving, even if on principle, and losing the support of and access to that influential network.
And they were right.
What you need to understand, taking this all back to what I believe is President Trump’s dilemma, is that that calculation about the power of “the network,” and the scary losses sustained by crossing “the network”, let alone losing its protection and resources, are not restricted to the Edge Foundation.
All of liberal elite society works in this exact same way.
It is all kind of like the mafia — you may not agree with the capo or some of the dons around you, but you know very well that crossing them means certain destruction for yourself.
So: everyone aligns.
I think this is what President Trump is also trying to explain, though of course he cannot state all this overtly.
Understand, too, what Weinstein and Dershowitz are separately trying to tell you. The Epstein files probably contain many innocent people as well as many guilty ones; but again, they are very likely to contain, innocent and guilty, some of the most powerful of President Trump’s current supporters; and some of the greatest of scientists and some of the most influential technologists of our time.
And even someone as powerful as the American President, in my calculation, can’t cross that most powerful of all powerful “networks.”
You should also absorb the nuances of what Weinstein is, as I understand him, trying to tell us.
In Epstein we are not just looking at a sexual blackmail operation for US and foreign political leaders and hedge fund guys.
We are also looking at a “construct” that seduced and lured scientists; that was institutionally set up to seduce and lure scientists; and that may have created conditions that look compromising on paper, whether the scientists did anything wrong or not. We are also looking at a machine constructed to entrap and perhaps pressure, whether they are innocent or guilty, a generation of the most important scientists of our time.
Why? Perhaps, as Weinstein is suggesting, to steer science itself.
Weinstein is sure that Epstein was an intel op. So, if he is correct — and I have no idea — those steering science, and to some extent, technology, by setting up via Epstein “kompromat” that can destroy and pressure both innocent and guilty scientists and technologists, is either our intelligence community — or not. Think about the national security implications of this, either way, if either possibility is true.
Who was drawn in? The scientists targeted were the precursor minds of our current world in its more dystopian aspects.
The scientists in this targeted “stable” deal with various dimensions; with pre-AI; with the management of awareness; with the difference between brain and consciousness; with genetics and the altering genes; with evolution; with ritual; with what makes humans human, and with what allows them to transcend human limitations. “Transhumanism’“is a reductive term in this context but someone powerful, as I think Weinstein is seeking to tell us, is very interested in science taking the same directions that support and align with where the Tech Bros are seeking to steer humanity; and the Tech Bros are taking the same directions that the targeted scientists took. This is non-random cultural evolution. What is behind this? What is the ultimate meaning? What is the desired outcome?
I don’t have the answers, but to me it seems that these are the key questions, and these questions may explain the megalith of internal resistance that may be facing President Trump.
The dinners of 2010 and beyond, turned into our reality in 2025.
This all greatly complicates the Epstein story. It makes it a story about the corrupting and perhaps even the blackmailing and directing of science and technology, and maybe even of both guilty and innocent scientists, and maybe even of guilty and innocent technologists, as well as being an easier-to-assess story about royals and retail clothing moguls and about, above all, the sexual abuse of children.
It may mean that innocent people as well as guilty — major scientists and major technologists, perhaps — may have been set up or enmeshed in circumstances that they now fear coming to light, whether they did nothing wrong at all, or whether they did something wrong.
It may mean that whoever was steering Epstein — was also steering our science.
That makes it a very different, very significant — perhaps culture-changing; perhaps history-changing — story.
It would make it a story with which we have to be persistent and steady in our demands; but also cautious, and methodical, and discerning.
This all may be even bigger and even more worrying, than we realize.
#####
I used to go to events hosted by publicist Peggy Siegel, who was also Jeffrey Epstein’s publicist. There were Wall Street guys and star journalists and B list movie stars and A list TV stars; politicians and fashion icons and socialites; old money and new money. After 2010 or so, there were tech royalty and tech investors.
The events were fun: movie premieres, and galas celebrating this or that charity; silent waiters and waitresses, horrible food, glowing candles; bare shoulders, magnolias in artsy tablescapes; soaring columns of the Library, or of the historic interior of 48 Wall Street, an ornate former bank.
At one event — I think it was a film premiere, so this would have been in a deluxe movie theatre — I remember that someone pointed out Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was finding his seat, as I recall, and he was so, so tall; his silver hair gleamed in the darkness; and, as monsters go, he looked personable.
He carried himself proudly — with no shame at all in his physical demeanor. This must have been about 2012; his rehabilitation PR lap. I was in a small group, and someone said he that had been in prison for the sexual abuse of children.
I recall a kind of collective shrug from the hedge fund guys who were standing around: a kind of, “Huh.”
Epstein obviously still had “juice,” was the vibe, and he had served his time. F Scott Fitzgerald pointed out that “there are no second acts in American lives”; but many in the Peggy Siegel crowd, in contrast, loved a good comeback from disgrace.
As I recall, some of the people with whom I was standing made their way over to meet him. Notoriety was the aura he brought to the scene; a frisson. Others did not react with the repugnance that I felt, or at least, not visibly.
I guess what I am trying to show you is — no one, or very few, in truly elite circles, wants to risk losing the valuable, precious, life-sustaining network.
So he or she goes along with just about anything, in the characters of others in the network.
This doesn’t mean they approve — but they go along.
You can’t cross the network.
Is that what President Trump is facing now?
I wonder.
I posted earlier that PRESIDENT TRUMP might just have made a move on his 4th Dimension Chess Board and then the DEMOcrats/HYPOCRITES reacted to DEMAND the release of everything! This puts PRESIDENT TRUMP as the DEFENDER of the “Network” and the D/H’s as the EXPOSERS! Now WHO will the “Network” blame for the damages to come???
Not sure what to make of all this. it all seems a bit theatrically diabolical. I’m sure there are groups of wealthy people who all believe they are the ones the world has been waiting for. By what she wrote , I want to protect myself from these people not give them permission.
I don’t think we peons need to worry about it. What the network is devising won’t have real impact for at least another generation.
But it has already had an impact on us. Those girls were daughters and sisters. Probably of very ordinary citizens.
Until digital currency becomes the norm, I think. Then surveillance and control will be complete.
you must not have children.
You must not have balls.
She has a powerful aptitude for discerning complexities undergirding human relationships and interactions with respect to power. It seems theatrical and diabolical because it is; but her point was not so much what wealthy people believe about themselves, but how power corrupts and controls elites whose influence over your life will reach the point where your permission (and mine) means nothing.
I wonder if this network is at least a branch of the globalist “Mafia”. People like this can easily view themselves as god like, and are attempting to alter human nature, a force which always spells doom to attempts at creating a communist “heaven on earth.” Worldwide altruism that is abhorrent of war or any other sort of conflict, especially in a world armed to the teeth with humanity erasing weapons.
Sounds great! Although there are “many a slip twix the cup and the lip”.
I waded through about 75% of this article and about all I got out of it was that rich, powerful elites have no morals.
That’s not “innocent” in my book. That’s very wickedly enabling and I have zero sympathy for any of them.
And this is another reason why the list will not come out. The public will only see the big picture — that “powerful elites have no morals.” And that is a good rule because humanity is generally, but not without exception, corrupted by power.
Many people who had meetings with, or attended parties that included, or worked for organizations with ties to Epstein are completely innocent with regard to his crimes. Mere association is not enough.
Precisely!
As if a Corruptocrat would even KEEP a list in the first place!
— —
Occam’s Razor would have it that Epstein Island was an easy place to launder money.
Occam’s Razor would also have it that no one would want to launder money there if Mossad was running it……or the Vatican Bank for that matter…..or BCCI for that matter.
Yes, not every guy who was an “associate” of Epstain is a pedo.
Billdo Clinton went to Pedo Island something like 17 times, though. Full on pedo.
Being married to that ugly skank Hitlery, I can understand why he preferred nubile teens but that doesn’t make it OK.
J Epstein had the painting of Bill Clinton in a dress with pearls and sensible pumps – Bubba no doubt posed for this painting
I disagree. Let’s take it to the typical extreme: do you consider those who do business with hamas or nazis are innocent? Doing business with, making money off of or enabling (in any way) is partnering with evil.
Knowing that someone is a child predator/groomer/trafficker and associating with them anyway makes you NOT innocent. What is the likelihood that any of epstein’s associates were ignorant of what he was doing? Very unlikely.
I’m sick of moral relativism.
If he really wants everyone to quit focusing on Epstein, he should quit bringing up the subject.
Epstein is dead. There is no list. The media love this ongoing soap opera and don’t want it to end.
How was this article helpful?
BTW, Trump today ordered that the files be released in their entirety. Yes, indeed some are in the hands of the courts and not under Trump’s release order, there’s that. . Let the media go on yammering.
FPM’s favorite new anti-Semite Naomi Wolf publishes anti-Israel garbage that you can see at this link: https://dailyclout.io/?s=Israel
For example, “Israel’s Genocide Betrays the Holocaust”: https://dailyclout.io/israels-genocide-betrays-the-holocaust/
Is this what the late David Horowitz would have wanted? I don’t think so. Shameful.
Post your suicide notice. That’s all anybody wants to hear from you, Sebastard.
You couldn’t find the truth with two hands and flashlight, Jew Hater. You lie all the time.
What are you actually getting out of this obsession with bathhouses and Epstein? What do you think you are going to accomplish by attacking me. And your English is barely legible. Guess what f*ck-wad. I’m not going anywhere.
I don’t even have to respond, but you are so effed up and insecure about your manhood, (well you are a sh*t eating Muslim, aren’t you) you will respond like Pavlov’s dog. You are one weak-a$$ piece of shyte.
It’s no wonder Muslims and JewHaters are the world’s loser.
You’ll be sucking dicks all day long.
Your mind is as weak as your body. I’m 61 years old and stronger than you were on your best day.
290 North 2nd ST, San Jose CA. Come by, you big mouthed punk. I’ll beat at the camel shit out of your islamopithecine ass. And make you eat it.
Not everyone. But you definitely are, scumbag. You even included your second comment to prove you are. “The poor jews always the victims.”
your Jew Hate will be your undoing. After all it undid the Nazis, Herr Sebastion.
So when does your intifada along with Al Bondingasshole begin? Can’t wait.
Focus on the awesome things POTUS Trump 47 and his Stellar Cabinet are accomplishing.
Nit picking at this Epstein falderal are like spoiled inheritance children when what we escaped from the last 4 years, Epstein and his frequenters and imbibers in pedophilia rape were of hardly any consequence. Trump 47 administration will be in office 6 months in 2 days. Give them time. Give them time!
Money talks is an old, old story. Clique members taking care of their own, likewise. Outsiders not wanting to mess with the clique, likewise. The process rolls along when no one with a moral backbone intervenes.
Liberal Elites want Open Borders and Disarmed American People to appease the UN/CFR/Globalists
Elite circles draw in all sorts of people—and people mostly beg to get in— even, or especially, if they don’t know the details of who or what really powers some clubby network or membership —which is always designed to look attractive and to be presented as very instrumental, or even critical, to one’s upward mobility and/ or continued success in life.
And maybe this doesn’t always turn into something evil. But clearly, sometimes—maybe most times—given a long enough trajectory and metastasis—it does.
Some person(s)(?) or entity(s) (?), with enormous wealth, saw in Epstein someone smart and attractive, who—with no scruples or hesitation—could be. . . whatever-was-needed. . . to run multiple kinds of ops—in Fantasy Island settings of the UTMOST luxury, with ALL the trappings of worldly success—including the Tech Titan friend group and the office at Harvard University, along with Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, and all those pretty, underage young things.
What could go wrong with such a program? Well, I like to think its sheer evil was—and always is—the key to a regime’s ultimate vulnerability and downfall. This is bigger than just one Hefner re-boot pimping underage girls with his sidekick Ghislaine. But then the question becomes: what exactly WAS the goal of the program? Who all was running and benefiting from the damn thing?
I appreciated Wolfe’s article for getting into the overall context of a whole network, the exploration and discussion of which will make for an interesting story indeed. I feel quite certain that the Epstein story will continue to unfold regardless of what happens with the release of files—which can certainly have been tampered with as part of this whole ugly mess.
I wonder if the network would hold together without the blackmail cementing its core.
Steering science is nothing new. COVID is a recent example. Climate change might top the list. I’m sure there are other examples out there.
Sounds like it’s all about the money
Not the morals I live by.
Does it matter. Everyone who thinks they’re anyone seem to be weighing in with their two cents as to what’s going on, what the truth is, what the motivation is, etc. What’s the point. There are facts and there is conjecture. We may never know all the facts. Big picture: Trump is doing an amazing job and has been battling the left (and much of the right) for many years now. Do we really need to contribute to this noise?
If there was a pattern of the administration lying and hiding things, that would be one thing. But there’s no evidence of that. So let’s move on and leave all the energy being put into this to the goons on the left and the gallery of idiots on the right.
G-d bless President Trump, an imperfect man (because all humans are) doing a monumental job in the fact of endless obstacles.
“If there was a pattern of the administration lying and hiding things, that would be one thing. But there’s no evidence of that.”
“The list is on my desk “.
“There is no list.”
Conclusion: Epstein ran a 💰 laundry.
Hey assling, I didn’t know Epstein ran a pedo ring. But I’m not surprised you know, or think you know.
You see, pork, I don’t care about Epstein, or Maxwell. But you seem to be overly concerned with all things gay, stupid and lascivious to the point where you come off as obsessed with homosexuality. But then you are definitely a fag.
After all, your bathhouse obsession is a big fat tell. Just how much time do you spend in SF, anyway?
All that dick measuring with Jeff is another tell.
And to answer your question, yes I am having you looked into. It’s not Mossad BTW. It’s an agency connected indirectly with, well. it’s need to know. Sorry pork.
I think you are a sick little arrogant fabulist with a sick little need to make yourself out to be more than you are. Basically you are a wannabee anything because you are an actual nothing. That’s how desperate you are.
In my service days I made a lot of contacts. I still have them and we still work together occasionally. And we’re good at what we do. So the question I’m asking, pork, how badly do you wanna throw down. Do you have the weight, punk?
You’re physically weak. We all know you can’t get it up, limpy. Not even when you’re around young boys.
And your obsession with bathhouses, gays, and freak sex continues and grows larger and along with your phony claims of political assassinations. as does your obsession with Epstein. You are truly one sick mofo. you really don’t have much going on in your pathetic life, do you. But you do brag a lot.
Most people like me have lives and couldn’t give two shits about Epstein.
You are so desperate you have to sponge off the actual investigations into you. But I’m not surprised. You are a degenerate Muslim Jew Hating foreigner.
I suppose you think you are mentally tough. I guess that’s why you engage in your pathetic dick measuring contests.
Yes, this current “news” cycle about Epstain is boring and annoying, isn’t it?
And Sebastard is definitely an annoying troll. I wouldn’t be surprised if he is an islamopithecine. I know he sucks dicks. All the Chomos do.
Hey assling, I thought I would copy and paste one of your more enlightened comments to some guy who took you to task.
“And you kiss Netanyahu and the invented and fake Israel’s ass”
Now that’s barely english. Very mature. You are such a grownup. But it’s what I’ve come expect from you. I love kindergarten English.
Did you learn that in Gaza? Your search a great rep for the Swinestinians.
you are one sick delusional whack job in the imagined reality of your stuffed studio apartment somewhere – so I will not give you one more second of my valuable and productive time
We know that Virginia Roberts/Giuffre has died. Is she the only woman connected with Jeffrey Epstein to have died at a young age?
” Mr. Trump’s not exposing the story is Mr. Trump’s not draining the swamp. That is a big moment in the history of MAGA.”
Anyone who criticizes anything President Trump says or does is a Communist pedophile who kills puppies and kittens. He DID end the war on day one and all those reports of a war continuing in Ukraine are bogus. His Big Beautiful Bill will eliminate the deficits as GDP growth will average 10% annually and annual tariff revenue will reach $3 trillion. Trump’s leadership has put us on the road to fiscal sanity and permanent prosperity. World leaders know they can trust him. He knows exactly what he is doing with tariffs. Those who do not understand giving Russia 50 more days don’t understand that Trump never said that because he already ended the war on day one.
I dig your reply and your soup Albondigas
It really boils down to this: you side with darkness there will be a heavy price to pay because the Light is coming!
The gubmint and dem Jews, eh?
I think your’re just resentful because you’re too much of a nobody to have ever been invited to Pedo Island.
We both know you’re a pedophile, Sebastard.
Coming from the serial liar and eunuch.
mi heffy Jeffy – I cannot stop laughing – I’m choking on my morning oatmeal brahhhhhh
So in other words, Trump gives them a pass?
I don’t think so, not this time. Expose them all and let the pieces fall where they will. Even if it destabilizes the government.
Time to take out the trash.
I dont care about the Epstein list. To me he used teenagers for a larger purpose, some of whom foolishly got pulled into something abhorrent. This was perverted—but sexual blackmail has been going on for thousands of years, and we somehow think this is a new art. All I care about is that the truth of who killed Epstein comes out. This must be exposed to the sanitizing effects of public knowledge and then action taken. The elite network as Dr Naomi Wolf has brought out must be brought into the light and justice meeted out—nor more hypocritical double standards.
Thanks for this facinating article, Dr. Wolf. My head is spinning a little bit. I agree with your conclusion. Having the DOJ release documentation via the New York court system is the best approach for President Trump. He stays above the fray, and keeps his promise per releasing the Epstein documentation. I doubt President Trump is on the list, or the Biden administration would have surely dropped a dime on him. Who was Epstein? How did he “really” make his money? Where did he want to “steer science to”? That Epstein had a darkside is proven fact. His sexual proclivities might not be the darkest corner of this saga.
So, this evil network having metastasized, now justifies itself by obfuscating the truth and all the victims are left silenced by their predation.
This is the unmitigated rationalization of their obscene indulgence in rape and pedophilia to the exclusion of justice!
It is this pernicious artifice, shrouding evil from international view and all the attendant repercussions that is not only murderous to the souls that have been violated but also to a world rapidly descending into a morally-repugnant pit where the appetites of those wealthy and influential can abrogate all laws and indulge in the most heinous, demeaning, soul-destroying and monstrous sexual behavior with impunity.
This coverup is a moral abomination for which this lengthy rationalization is nothing more than the justification of allowing this evil to continue. Apparently, those who are being protected see themselves as above the law while the gnawing destruction of the innocent continues unabated.
The evil gods among us and the sycophants who facilitate them.
DR. Wolf, your article did a great job explaining what I’ve been trying to get across to my MAGA circle of family, friends, acquaintances, et al. including those who consider themselves of the progressive persuasion. Almost immediately as this all unfolded, I figured this was what was motivating President Trump’s bizarre actions and statements regarding the Epstein evidence/files/lists. I’m relieved to read this from someone of your stature and reputation as it validates my thoughts (and AJ’s as well) regarding this matter. Early on, I was disappointed that President Trump couldn’t handle this as eloquently as your article has, in explaining his motivations. I am confident that President Trump has not and will not let us down. Thanks for putting my mind at ease. Nice to have you in the info war.
No one needs the exposure which could come from sloughing off the Epstein life, ever. There are others like Epstein, of course, who have not yet been found out. From my personal experience in the mid-1970’s in New York dealing directly with Donald Trump, the developer: he is very intelligent, quick thinking, focuses intensely and would not associate with that level of bum, no matter how wealthy. He was a “family man”, as wealthy as he was back then. I voted for him and will continue to support him in his political efforts.