|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Order Michael Finch’s new book, A Time to Stand: HERE. Prof. Jason Hill calls it “an aesthetic and political tour de force.”
The UK’s far-left government has been working for quite some time on trying to define the concept of “Islamophobia.” This is urgently needed, Labour Party wonks are telling British citizens, because of a rise in “hate crimes” against Muslims. Who says there has been such a rise? The same Muslim groups that are pushing for the criminalization of “Islamophobia,” as well as the Labour government itself. Could Labour really be trying to solidify its hold on the Muslim vote by destroying the freedom of speech and imposing Sharia blasphemy laws through the back door, designed as efforts to stamp out “hate”? Why, of course they could. In fact, that is exactly what they’re doing.
As is the usual practice in such cases, leftists are obscuring the real issues with false premises and straw men. The Telegraph reported Monday that “stereotyping grooming gangs as Muslim could fall foul of a definition of Islamophobia being considered by the Government.” Now, no one who is informed about the rampant problem of rape gangs in the U.K. that victimized and destroyed the lives of hundreds of thousands of British girls could maintain that they are all Muslim down to the last man. However, as Holy Hell: Islam’s Abuse of Women and the Infidels Who Enable It shows, not only have the vast majority of the perpetrators been Muslims, but most of the victims were non-Muslim British girls.
In fact, for decades, British officials passed up numerous opportunities to do something to stop the rape gangs and protect British girls. They did so precisely because they feared the professional and even personal ruin that would almost certainly follow being accused of “Islamophobia” and “racism.”
Instead of correcting this suicidal myopia and acting to save the British nation before it’s too late, the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer is working to codify this massive cowardice into law. The Telegraph states that “‘prejudicial’ stereotyping or racialization of Muslims which is designed to stir up racial hatred is said to be one strand of a definition [of Islamophobia] drawn up by a working group for ministers.”
This is red meat for leftists who think they can use the force of the state to stamp out “hate” and enforce the multicultural paradise of their dreams. All they’ll end up doing, as is always the case under leftist governments, is terrifying the populace into submission and moving Britain ever closer to becoming an authoritarian state.
If this understanding of Islamophobia is adopted and is criminalized in British law, how will British authorities react when citizens repeat what has been known for years about these rape gangs? As far back as 2014, the Jay Report, an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in the British town of Rotherham, found that the rape gangs had victimized over 1,400 girls, and that the perpetrators were overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslims.
In 2017, the Times of London reported that a British think-tank “looked at 58 cases of grooming gangs identified in the UK between 2005 and 2017, which led to 264 convictions for grooming. Of the 264 offenders, 84% were of Asian heritage, mostly Pakistani; 8% were black and 7% were white.” If someone in Britain repeats those facts now, will that constitute “prejudicial stereotyping” of Muslims and end up with the person pointing out the truth being arrested?
What if someone points out that the Qur’an allows Muslim men to have sexual relations with up to four wives as well as the “captives of the right hand” (4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30)? Throughout the history of Islam, this has led in numerous countries to the mass rape of non-Muslim women. Will pointing that out in Britain now constitute “prejudicial stereotyping” of Muslims, designed to “stir up racial hatred”?
How will British authorities determine whether someone is trying to stir up racial hatred or is legitimately concerned about the well-being of British girls? To make a subjective evaluation of the reasons why someone says or does something make the difference between whether or not it is considered a criminal act is foolish in the extreme. If Labour succeeds in doing this, the only certainty is that British prisons will end up being filled with people whose only crime was to repeat truths that the government preferred to keep concealed.
Britain could be in its last days as a free society. Its death, if it comes, will come by its own hand, with the left pulling the trigger.
I don’t think either Churchill or Thatcher would approve of t his all the British Lions now doing tricks in the UN/Globalists Circus
Somewhere in Hell, Oswald Moseley and Lord Haw Haw are laughing their heads off . . .
And Margaret Thatcher is turning over in her grave!
Britain usually requires us to follow their lead in social policies. The brits follow along like sheep into their pens to await slaughtering. They have been a muslim country since the election of the Londonistan mayor. I think we will stand as we are armed but maybe not. Off to moderation, everyone have a good weekend.
Still the best definition I have seen–
“Islamophobia” is a word “created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”
Christopher Hitchens
I have Islamodium
Sounds like a halal laxative.
It is plain to see that the UK government has disarmed their subjects so that they CAN NOT defend themselves or their families from attack by government forces or foreign invaders. I seem to recall that the UK government tried to do the same thing here in America 250 years ago. They got a revolution and lost their most valuable colony for this. Will the English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh people have to revolt again to regain their freedom? Has anyone mentioned this to “King” Charles? Charles reigns but does not rule. But he still has tremendous influence if he wants to!
My belief is that he has covetly converted to Islam already. Everything I see him do confirms it.
Do the Moslems treat white converts as second-class?
I think that Chuckles is an islamophile. He does love going to the dressing up box and pretending to be an arab. A bit like Justine Trudeau who loved to play at being someone else.
You are correct John, King Chuckles is in love with Islam.
Why Does King Charles Love Islam?
What did his mommy really think of him?
It’s only common sense that the road to dictatorship in Britain – via the
populace painfully enduring Muslim atrocities – will inevitably turn into
a super highway. Because the atrocities will worsen – with no recourse
on the part of the people to do anything about it.
Rapes and gang rapes will accelerate. So will assaults, including deadly
ones and other forms of intimidation. Muslim demands for dress codes –
for all – in school and at work + halal menus and prayer times + elimination
of dogs as pets + segregation of the sexes will pop up everywhere. As
illegal Muslim migrants keep pouring in and as Sharia Courts with their
anti-British draconian laws proliferate.
If the English people rise up against such horror – they’ll be met with the
butt of a rifle ‘to restore order” – and permanent tyranny.
Then the Red-Green Axis of Globalist Marxism and Islam will set its sights
on America as never before. It behooves Western people to remember
that the ability to strategize – wanting you and your progeny to live free –
and belief in God is a powerful defense against the Communist-Islamic
scourge now trying to take over the world.
The UK, like so many of the EU countries, is committing cultural suicide, slowly but deliberatly. There are times when tolerance becomes suicidal, particularly when you allow a foreign culture to dominate your politics. It’s a shame. Islam is NOT compatible with Western values, no matter how much you argue the point, and the UK’s crime statistics tell the story. Sad to say, but I think a full-blown civil war, and NOT more legislation, is their only salvation. When you’re knee-deep in your own sh1t, more toilet paper is not the answer
Not suicide; Murder! Murder at the hands of sanctimonious philistines, unable to recognize or value the richly unique character of Britain. Murder at the hands of self-important politicians who alter forever our ancestral homeland for the sake of their woke image, “the bubble reputation”.
The UK has truly lost its way through sheer stupidity, shortsightedness, blatant disregard for its own citizens, and the compulsion to lick the boots of those who are very successfully shoving their ideology down these idiots’ throats.
England, Ireland and Scotland used to be on my bucket list of travel destinations. Today, I wouldn’t go there, even if you paid for my trip! I predict that more and more travellers will avoid the area altogether.
I’m with you. My mom was a war bride from Oxford. I’ve always wanted to visit there and see some other sites I find interesting. I’ve closed the door on that after seeing what’s been going on in the whole of Great Britain. It’s like watching a car wreck in slow motion.
The USA needs to write and adopt a legal definition for “religion.” Of course, that definition would preclude thought systems that violate federal laws from claiming status as a religion.
In their zeal to commit national suicide the U.K. (United Kaliphate) has become one of the most totalitarian countries in the world.
you already cant tell the truth in ireland . enoch burke has served 400 days in jail for misgendering a student at the school he teaches at . he defines only 2 sexes , it has got him in trouble and jail time for not bowing the knee to the insanity that the courts want to impose on everyone . coming to a town near you .
Islamophobia is for the most part a myth. Islamopandering is all too real.
The UK needs to close up he whole thing and Screw the UN/Globalists