Welsh Government Spends $1,600,000 to Extirpate ‘White Privilege’

Order Jamie Glazov’s new book, ‘United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny, Terror, and Hamas’: HERE.

Wales, that gave us Dylan Thomas, David Jones, Richard Burton, and the Mabinogion, has now given us something much less appealing, by spending more than 1.2 million pounds ($1.6 million) on teaching students about that will-o’-the-wisp, “white privilege.” Although all over the Western world, and especially in academic centers, affirmative action rules the roost, and white candidates have learned, to their dismay, that they are now the victims of affirmative action, there are people who still believe that it is not affirmative action, but “white privilege” that needs to be ended if we are to have an “anti-racist” society.

More on this subject being taught in Welsh schools can be found in this February article that unfortunately remains relevant: “Teenagers taught about ‘white privilege’ in ‘anti-racist’ virtual reality metaverse,” by Marcus Donaldson, GB News, February 8, 2026:

The Welsh Government has invested more than £1.2million in a virtual reality educational platform designed to lecture students about “white privilege”.

Described as the “world’s first anti-racist virtual world,” the immersive 3D environment has been deployed in colleges across Wales for pupils aged 16 and above since 2024.

Students navigate through a digital space featuring a central atrium decorated with portraits of civil rights figures, including Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela and Betty Campbell.

The platform contains interactive lessons covering “black feminism” and “decolonising politics,” with one section examining “sociology through an anti-racist lens.”

It also explores how “whiteness” manifests in language, policies and research, and how privilege affects social, educational and workplace settings.

Among the key terms students are encouraged to learn are “patriarchy” and “imperialism,” alongside the concept of “white privilege”, which the platform defines as “inherent advantages possessed by a white person, which means that during their day-to-day life, they do not have to consider their race.”…

But of course white people, constantly bombarded with the need to fight “white privilege,” and facing discrimination through affirmative action, do have to “ consider their race” at every turn.

“During the famine of 1770 the agricultural tax was increased from 10 per cent under the Mughals to 50 per cent under the British East India Company, leading to the loss of 10 million lives in Bengal, equivalent to the Black Death in Europe or the Holocaust,” the platform preaches.

It was the British who replaced the Muslim Mughals as the rulers of India. And it was during the Mughal rule that Muslims murdered 70-80 million Hindus. But apparently this is not to be mentioned; only the white Europeans are to be held accountable for mass deaths in India.

The metaverse also presents various strands of feminist thought, including psychoanalytical feminism, a 1970s theory which draws on the work of Sigmund Freud.

The Viennese witch-doctor is still molding dimwits from beyond the grave.

The platform describes this as a “theory of oppression that asserts that men have an inherent psychological need to subjugate women.”

It adds: “This branch of feminism seeks to gain insight into how our psychic lives develop in order to better understand and change women’s oppression.”…

There is oppression of women, but it’s not to be found any longer among the non-Muslims in Europe and North America. In those places, feminism has swept the board. But women continue to be oppressed in Muslim lands. It is the Qur’an that instructs husbands to “beat their wives” if they so much as suspect them of “disobedience.” It is Muslims who consider a female witness’ testimony to be worth half that of a man. It is Muslims who believe that a daughter should inherit only half that of a son. It is Muslim men who can divorce their wives merely by uttering — or even faxing — the triple-talaq, while a Muslim wife must go through a lengthy and expensive process to obtain a divorce. But don’t expect those Welsh people hoping to raise “awareness” of feminism to mention any of that. It would only encourage “Islamophobia,” and of course we can’t have that.

You can hardly open a history or literature textbook these days, from junior high through college, that doesn’t mention “feminism” and the need to pull down the soi-disant “patriarchy” that is supposedly destroying girls’ sense of self-worth. That may have once been true, but it is true no longer, and hasn’t been since the 1960s, when Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, and Ms. magazine first entered the feminist lists, and demanded equal rights, equal pay, equal everything — and what’s more, they got it.

Not enough “feminism” is being taught in schools? Oh dear, we can’t let that happen. Ladle out more of that feminism, please, lest society backslides on this most important of subjects.

Here’s glory for you: Wales aims to be “the world’s first anti-racist country by 2030.” And of course, the only kind of racism that the Welsh need to suppress is that of their indigenous citizens, still enjoying their “white privilege.” But how better to end “white privilege” than to practice “anti-white privilege,” which we know by another name — “affirmative action”?

Is it possible that “racism” does not explain differences in outcomes? Which ethnic groups place an emphasis on academic achievement? Is “white racism” to be blamed for the superior performance of Chinese students, as compared to the performances of black Africans? Is white racism what explains the poor performance of Muslims as compared to non-Muslims, or isn’t it, rather, the fact that Islam itself discourages free and skeptical inquiry, and instead encourages slavish acceptance of what is in the Qur’an and hadith?

“This pioneering project has delivered overwhelmingly positive outcomes and reflects our commitments to an anti-racist Wales, as well as reflecting similar offers within English institutions.”

What were those “overwhelmingly positive outcomes”? Have white people in Wales now learned to despise themselves for the “white privilege” they have enjoyed, and are now determined to make up for that condition by instead promoting “black and brown privilege”? And how long would that compensating privilege have to last before “racism” in Wales has been extirpated? Who will decide?

And what if the Welsh government were to decide to stop talking about “racism” and “anti-racism” and “white privilege” altogether, and instead have the schools in Wales teach English, and mathematics, and history, as they once did, in the days some now deem benighted, but we should now call enlightened.